ML20151C914

Forwards Diagnostic Evaluation Rept 2 of Evaluation Conducted Onsite on 871130-1211.Overall Performance of Plant Was Solid SALP Category 2 W/Improving Trend.Evaluation of Rept Requested

ML20151C914
Person / Time
Site:	McGuire
Issue date:	04/08/1988
From:	Stello V NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR OPERATIONS (EDO)
To:	Owen W DUKE POWER CO.
Shared Package
ML20151C916	List: ML20151C914 ML20151C961
References
NUDOCS 8804130260
Download: ML20151C914 (2)

See also: IR 07100130/2012011

Text

l # o UNITED STATES

'

, 8 ^ ,'n

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

t, .

t r' ASHING Tc N, C. C, 20655

s 1

4

4 9.....,

1988

APR@

Docket Nos. 50-369

50-370

Mr. Warren H. Owen, Executive Vice President

Engineering, Construction and

Production Group

Duke Power Company

Post Office Box 33189

Charlotte, North Carolina 28242

Dear Mr. Owen:

SUBJECT:

DIAGNOSTIC EVALUATION TEAM REPORT FOR MCGUIRE NUCLEAR STATION

This letter forwards the Diagnostic Evaluation Team Report for the McGuire

Nuclear Station. The evaluation was conducted by a team of NRC headquarters

and regional evaluators with team leadership and support provided by the Office

for Analysis and Evaluation of Operational Data over the period November 30

to December 11, 1987 and January 4-8, 1988. As you are aware, this is a

nm NRC assessment tool that is intended to provide an independent assessment

• of licensee performance, and as such, its principal focus is on safety

perfomance and not compliance with regulatory requirements. Following the

conclusion of the onsite evaluation, the findings were discussed at an exit

meeting with you and other company executives and managers on January 22, 1988.

The HRC effort involved an assessment of overall plant operation and the Duke

Power Company major programs for supporting safe plant operation at the McGuire

Nuclear Station. Particular attention was directed in the areas of engine.ering

support, operations, maintenance, testing, quality prograrns, management '

oversight and organization culture and climate.

The team concluded that the overall performance of McGuire was a solid SALP

Category 2 with an improving trend. Although the team observed a number of

strengths in Duke's organization and programs which contributed to the

improving trend, the team also identified some organizational and programatic

weaknesses, which could slow down the improvement efforts. Section 2 of the

enclosed report provides the team evaluation results which include: (1) major

findings and conclusions, (2) specific findings and conclusions, and (3) root

cause determinations. Section 3 of the report provides the detailed evaluation

findings. Some of these items may be potential enforcement findings. Any

enforcement actions will be identified by our Region II office.

.

This report is provided for your evaluation and use in fomulating and

implementing appropriate action in response to the team findings. I request

,

8804130260 003400

PDR ADOCK 03000369

g PDR

. -. ,_

- - _ . - , -

- _-__ __--_

Mr. Warren H. Owen -2- gpg 8 1989

.

that you evaluate the report and, that as soon as appropriate, provide my office

'

a written response. Since I have directed the NRC staff to review and followup .

the more detailed findings of the evaluation, your response to the specific l

evaluation results delineated in Section 2 of the report, would greatly facili. '

tate that effort.

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790(a), a copy of this letter and the enclosure

will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room.

Should you have any questions concerning this evaluation, we would be pleased

to discuss them with you.

Sincerely.

Origiral signed b

Mt9I 0t e11o,, y

Victor Stello, Jr.

Executive Director for Operations

Enclosure: Diagnostic Evaluation

Team Report for McGuire Nuclear

Station

Distribution (w/ enc 1)

x DCS -

PDR ,

LPDR

l

AE00'/F

R

Distribution (w/o encl)  :

ELJordan CJHeltemes ED0 r/f w/o encl.  ;

DOA R/F Rl,Spes sa rd

DEIIB R/F SDRubin

HBa11ey RPerch l

RFreeman RLloyd

AHowell DAllisen '

JTaylor JJohnson I

WMiroskoski TEMurley i

ABDavis, RIII RMartin, RIY

'

JMartin, RV JNGrace, RII

RTRussell, RI , i

'

• SEE PREVIOUS CONCURRENCE

FC :DOA:DEIIB :DOA:DEIIB :DOA:DEIIB :AEOD:DOA :AEOD :AEOD

I/

p':EDC

....:............:............:............:............:............:............:....'..\..... -

AME :RPerch:cg* :hBailey* :SDRubin* :RLSpessard* :CJHeltemes* :ELJordan* :VStello

....:............:............:............:............:............:............:...........

ATE :02/ /88 :02/ /88 :02/ /88 :02/ /88 :02/ /88 :02/ /88 :0 h /88

- ' '

w- -

rw s-- a