ML20078E513

From kanterella
Revision as of 04:21, 27 September 2022 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Transmits Correction of Typos,Including Correction of Typo in Encl 3 of 941206 Submittal of Topical Rept NEDO-32205-A, Equivalent Margin Analysis - Plant Applicability Verification Form - Quad Cities Station, Per GL 92-01
ML20078E513
Person / Time
Site: Quad Cities  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 01/25/1995
From: Schrage J
COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO.
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
Shared Package
ML20078E514 List:
References
GL-92-01, GL-92-1, NUDOCS 9501310463
Download: ML20078E513 (3)


Text

7-

.. ) Commonwealth 1400 Opus PLTe Edison Downers Grove ulinois 60515 -

January 25,1995 U.S, Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555  :

Attn: Document Control Desk

Subject:

Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station Units 1 and 2  ;

Generic Letter 92-01, Supplement 1, " Reactor Vessel Structural Integrity"  :

NRC Docket Nos. 50-254/265

References:

(a) J. Stang to D. Farrar letter, dated April 14,1994. l (b) P. Piet to W. Russell letter dated August i1,1994.

(c) Teleconference between Comed (J. Schrage, et al) and NRC i (R. Pulsifer, et al) on October 20,1994. ,

(d) J.L. Schrage to USNRC letter dated December 6,1994.

(e) M.A. Jackson to USNRC letter dated July 1,1992, Comed response to Generic Letter 92-01.

The Reference (a) letter required Commomwealth Edison (Comed) to confirm ,

~

commitment and applicability of the BWR Owners Group efforts to resolve reactetr vessel structural issues, and to verify the information contained in an NRC database. Corned  :

provided the required information in Reference (b).

  • During the Reference (c) Teleconference, the NRC requested clarification of the.

information which was submitted in Reference (b). This was provided in Reference (d).

Upon further review of the information provided in Reference (d), Comed identified  !

two typographical errors in the information presented for Quad Cities Station. This letter l' transmits a correction of the typographical errors, including a correction of a typographical error in Enclosure 3 of Reference (d) (NEDO-32205-A; Equivalent Margin Analysis - Plant Applicability Verification Form - Quad Cities Station). A replacement for Enclosure 3 of  !

I Reference (d) is included as an Enclosure to this letter.

k wumammhei l Q,nrna F 9501310463 950125  !

PDR ADOCK 05000254 1 g

l I p PDR

4 .

U.S. NRC

$- January 25,1995 Low Uoner Shelf Enercy (LUSE)

The applicability of topical report NEDO-32205-A, Revision I has been confirmed for Quad Cities Units 1 and 2.

Quad Cities Units I and 2 Near-core material surveillance data for Quad Cities Units 1 and 2 were evaluated as specified in Appendix B of the NEDO Report. The Appendix H capsule data shown in Table 13 of Reference (e) (also provided as Enclosure 1 in Reference (d)) were excluded from this evaluation because the fluence values are below the range of Regulatory Guide 1.99 Rev. 2, ,

Figure 2. Ten of the surveillance data shown in Table 14 of Reference (e)(also provided as Enclosure 2 in Reference (d)) show a decrease in USE less than predicted in Regulatory Guide 1.99 Rev. 2, and the equivalent margin of the NEDO Report is bounding for the plant.

For the two Quad Cities Unit 2 submerged are weld surveillance data points which show a  ;

decrease in USE greater than predicted in Regulatory Guide ~ 1.99 Rev. 2, the plant applicability verification of Appendix B of the NEDO Report was performed, and the results show that the equivalent margin analysis is still bounding for the plant. This information is provided in the Enclosure to this letter.

To the best of my knowledge and belief, the information contained herein is true and correct. In some respect, this information is not based on my personal knowledge, but upon  ;

information furnished by other Commonwealth Edison and contractor employees. Such information has been reviewed in accordance with company practice, and I believe it to be reliable.

We trust that the information is satisfactory; however, should you have any questions, or desire.mtv. additional inrnym onn on ,

this issue, please do not hesitate to contact this office.

i OFFICIAL SEAL h MARY JO YACK l Respectfully, ll l mouny pusuc SMTE oNLUNolSl l> -

ll ur coMWSSloN [XPtRES 11/29/97 'l i......._............----t o m L. c 3, hh% n,, med mrtr Nuclear Licensing Administrator -

En#closu[e/ (,/

cc: J.B. Martin, Regional Administrator - RIII R. Pubifer, Project Manager - NRR C. Miller, Senior Resident Inspector - Quad Cities Office of Nuclear Facility Safety - IDNS k WAtedraspryhprJ P

ENCLOSURE Equivalent Margin Analysis Plant Applicability Verification Form Quad Cities Station t-E i

i I

I

. _ . . __.. _