IR 05000206/1984018

Insp Repts 50-206/84-18,50-361/84-23 & 50-362/84-23 on 840723-27.No Noncompliances Noted.Major Areas Inspected: Followup on IE Info Notice 84-07,security Events Followup, Testing & Maint & Security Program Audit.Realted Info Encl

ML20236C563
Person / Time
Site:	San Onofre
Issue date:	08/10/1984
From:	Schaefer D, Schuster M NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V)
To:
Shared Package
ML20236C515	List: IA-86-500, Partially Withheld Ltr Forwarding Rept of Inquiry Q5-84-020 Re Allegations of Drug Usage,Per 840829 & 1217 Telcons. Record of 850109 & 1007 Telcons Encl IR 05000206/1983023 IR 05000206/1984018 IR 05000206/1985015 ML20236C511 ML20236C544 ML20236C569 ML20236C700 ML20236C703 ML20236C723 ML20236C948 ML20236C971 ML20236C979 ML20236C990 ML20236D014 ML20236D045 ML20236D329 ML20236D339 ML20236D350 ML20236D373 ML20236D385 ML20236D400 ML20236D420 ML20236D463 ML20236D484 ML20236D499 ML20236D515 ML20236D543 ML20236D571 ML20236D583 ML20236D587
References
FOIA-86-500 50-206-84-18, 50-361-84-23, 50-362-84-23, IEIN-84-07, NUDOCS 8710270246
Download: ML20236C563 (6)

Text

,

. ' ' . , ', (- [

.. .

The information on this pegs is censidsrad to be appropriate for public disclosure pursuant to 10 CFR 2.790 U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

REGION V

l Report No /84-18, 50-361/84-23 and 50-362/84-23 Docket No ,'50-361 and 50-362

'

License No DPR-13, NPF-10, NPF-15 Licensee: Southern California Edison Company P. O. Box 800, 2244 Walnut Grove Avenue Rosemead, California 91770 Facility Name: San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Units 1, 2 and 3 Inspection at: Camp Pendleton, California Inspection conducted: July 23-27, 1984 e a,

}I'<* ,

Inspector: [8 ks -

b..< /J. [ Y D. W. Schaefer, Physic 1 Security Inspector Datd Sikned Approved By: /M bM H. D. Schuster, Acting Chief f N/IT Date Signed Safeguards and Emergency Preparedness Branch Inspection Sunusar ;

Areas Inspected: Follow-up on Information Notice 84-07; Security Events Follow-up; Safety / Security Assessment Report Follow-up; Security Organization-Personnel; Security Organization-Responser Security Program

,

Audit.; Testing and Maintenance; Physical Barriers-PA; Physical Barriers-VA; Security System Power Supply; Assessment Aids; Access control-Personnel; Access Control-Packages; Access Control-Vehicles; Detection Aids-PA; Detection Aids-VA; Alarm Stations; Communications; Physical Protection Safeguards Information; Independent Inspection Effort and Follow-up Items from previous security inspection The inspection was started during regular hours and involved 37 hours4.282407e-4 days <br />0.0103 hours <br />6.117725e-5 weeks <br />1.40785e-5 months <br /> onsite by one NRC inspector. Of the total, 6 inspection hours were accomplished during other than regular work hour Results: The licensee was found to be in compliance with NRC requirements within the areas inspecte .

.

.

.

<

• .

( (

e e

.

.

.

.

g1

.

.

. .

P\

.

s-1:

.1'

<

. *

.

....? - *

, ,. . . . . ,, .

. . - .. < -

l

• _ _ _ During this inspection, the licensee Medical Department briefed the inspector in detail on the processing of urinalysis samples. Since January 1,1984, all new-hire personnel applying for any position within Southern California Edison (SCE) are required to successfully pass a urinalysis test. Each new-hire reports to the Medical Department and provide the required urine sample. Each sample is individually sealed (using medical " evidence" tape) and transported daily to CDL Laboratory in Tarzana California. Written results of each urinalysis are provided to 'the Medical Department within two days. The licensee -is present,1y staffing a proposal to expand this testing to all new-hire personnel (SCE and contract personnel) and further to conduct an annual urinalysis test of all personnel. I is proposed that the urinalysis testing will be successfully completed prior to the initial issuance of the security unescorted access photo identification badge and annually thereafter prior to the reissuance of the security badg . On December 30, 1983, the SCIIGS Site Manager, in a letter to the

' Regional Administrator, Region V, NRC discussed plans for the replacement of the Unit 1 Esterline security computer. The licensee has completed an internal review and determination of all factors associated with expanding the Units 2/3 Honeywell Security computer

.

Supamecsa m .

- --

" - -- ~ (

.

r- a Q

-

..

to Unit I to totally replace the existing Esterline Security Computer and to be able to control all plant securlty functions through a single computer system. The licensee provided the inspector with a copy of this April 18, 1984 internal review. This review concluded that the Honeywell system has sufficient memory and CPU capacity to accommodate the additional activities from Unit I with minimal risk of unacceptable degradation of system performance, and recommended system expanding to include Unit the Units 2/3 Honeywell Security Computer Discussion with the licensee during this

,

inspection and again during the exit meeting confirmed that by August 15, 1984, the licensee will provide an implementation schedule {

1. to Region V for expansion of the Honeywell computer to

.

Unit

During the exit meeting, the inspector noted that froe January 1 through July 20, 1984, the Unit 1 Esterline computer experienced 197 unscheduled stalls during which time the computer ceased failed to annunciate all Unit 1 VA alarms and all Unit 1 portals locke Even though each of these stalls averaged only 1-2 minutes Unit in duration, they were very disruptive to personnel at The inspector emphasized the need to replace the Unit 1 )

i Esterline Security computer as soon as possible, thereby. increasing the Security Unit Departments a pport to the safe operation of SONGS, (50-361/84-23-01) - On July 10, 1984, Mr. F. P. Eller, San Onofre Security Manager, telephonically drug allegationreported to Region V information concerning a recent at San Onofr SCE Corporate Security had interviewed of drug use at a former Bechtel Foreman who had second hand knowledge SONG The Bechtel Foreman knew of another employee that has first hand knowledge and this information had been provided to Bechtel Power Company for further investigation. This matter was discussed with the licensee during this inspection and the licensee reaffirmed their commitment to provide Region V with a copy of the completed Bechtel investigation. 50-361/84-23-02

y I

.

.

- -_

_- - _ , u.s wontam mlcute.1ony couuissios ace % scn ALLEGATION DATA trei,veter. .aru FORM 81888- I

.

RECEfVING CFFICE ' Docket Number (if applicable)

-

fedemel

/ 8 0 C U 1 O b Fccifttylles) Involved:

C3 rrere then 3, or If 8# /7 840 h Ms fjM puneris, orrite GENERICI I 5' o - o' s /, /

[ b b b 3 (c 'b

'

_

~

onsite health end safety 2. Functicmal Arestallnvolved:

scA d nep,op,'wie be.t )1 I operetions _

'

offsite health and safety

_, construction _ . _ ,

emergency preparedness a d safepuseds ,_

--

f l

L other tspecity)

-

I lA l l l e iz l /,l e l I A la/lol ISl Altel&l IA LEltels l61 lolid {

s. description: '

',"'""*'*'"'**' 131/ lf-le_I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Il

II IIIll IIIII1IIIIIIIIIII1]

' I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I il i 4. Source of Allegation: security guerd (Check app,op'iste boal ~~". contractor employee _, ,

licensee employee __., news media

_

NRC employee ,_

private citizen

---

'

__ orge n1 ration isp.c6fyl other ispecitst f6 Y W V (~ert ha e k r Em ,s /s,o e 6 -

MM DD YY 5. Date Aftegation Received: 9 A *8 N " V #" -

triest twe init:et end i.. nom 1 #

5. Name of individual )

Receiving Allegation:

7. Office: 8 OS b/ TWf#Q i

.

ACTION OFFICE

3. Action Office Conteet: trie ieweinut.i. .ndi..inemet _

,

7l 7 g 9. FTS Telephone Number: l9 g ,

IY v/

10. Status: Open, if f ollowup actions are pendit.g er in progress scheck one)

Closed,if followup actions are completed Q MM DD W I ,s/

< -

T 11.1 D cument No . Date Closed: 10 5 l0 ~3 l &

42. Rey.r, s:

eic ;o ;3 ic ;,i i, ;jl Iri< lcle i Iu<IThIlu,leiAlaI]

,,,,,,,,

lo h 171E 10 l 18l A h 1 13 l ,171r1 I l l l l \llIIJ

.

'

"**'

• " ,'"'- -

$l$steQ029?uQGr*:t*t?O '

R tl ~

$ 4*

c 0D? N t

(p t&

._ _ _ - - _ - _ - _ - -

I $

I fLW I REVISION

,

'O 8~ '

• f A()L il Y 1YPE : OIM S DAT g Y FORM

'

• 1iPL Of CA5I:

fWp ((NR) POWf R RI A(10R/D0f kil # o g post,J fir,lR) fiO' - POWI R RL AC10R/liAML

,, (viliD) VI NDDR/DOLEL1 #_,_M._,o g pp34 _

k, (((A) Q) INO.ilR[ A15151 1)llW151,16AllDN (MLIC) MAlERIAL t)tEfJ5E/NAME -

-

(01H) 01HER / /NAME

• DATE OF RECEIPT: h M -84

,

-- _ _ _

• 11TLE: (Limit I

. - .

racters)@rl Orihn - Dru/ arg. Alcz)hol. pg '

'6 Einpl04ess On1nA

~

]NVEST]G TO

'

OfF ths. Sh INIT l ALS:

• LEA [ h

-

.

' CASE 51 ATUS:

SOURCE OF ALLEGA110N:

(1)L]CENSEE A ((0) OPEN

'

T) TRANSFERRED (A CL OSED/ ACTIVE '

(2) VEtiDOR ~ ~ 6) ((5) PUBLIC INTERVENDR (C)) CLOSED / INACTIVE -

(3) CONTRACTOR (4) NRC (7) ANONYtiOUS

• FIEt WORK ST ATUS: 4[8{0THER TYPE OF WROiGD0 LNG: "'""l'"'*

(PN) PEND]NG FP) FIELD WORi: l'i PROGRESS

~ ((FA) FIELD WORK IN ABEYANCE ((FD) FALSE FS) FALSE DOCUMENTS STATEMENTS

.

,

HI) HAPASSi1ENT/ INTIMIDATION (FC) TIELO WORK COMPLETE (DR) DRAFT REPORT'

RR) REPORTING REQUIREMENTS

.

(HR) HEADQUARTER REVIEW @ OT) OTHER dn14 J' lal&)1cf y39 (FR) FINAL REPORT ISSUED DESCRIP110N: (Limit 500 Cha r6cters)

An anonynwus alIceer calIcd thc. NPC nesIber& .Tnspector*s frict. and bringing allt6ed iri druds and+ndalcohol Sar+IsH into +he NutitM emPIOVeto W et s0Ne proteded. arce CO.%:.15/ REMARKS: (Limit 500 Characters)

G544-00L 4 START DATE: f-2 4 '64- FIELD OFFICE : 67.86V E511 MATED COMPL E110N DATE: /h)C/)Dgg_ ALLEGATION NUMBER ' '. ' .

AC10AL C0KPLET10N DA1E: **

_

_

FACILITY ZIP CODE:_ l ALL RFLAlE) CASF5: RE FERRAL :

OS t'edAO

' E00 (RS) REGION 5 g I

i l

HQ 01A (Rl) REGION 1 k*

DOJ l (R2) REGION 2

'

LAW INF /

(R3) REGION 3 FBI E (R4) REGION 4 OTHER FOIA: * '

a T4 h bm. 3 eREQUIRED ELEMWT "## "' "I

- - _ _ ._- - _ _ $

,

, ,

%W-OoLD CONVERSATION RECORD 'f,'g g g,,4 ^/, ut g gp/

" ""

O vis T _ O CONFERENCE P ONE NAME/sMOL INT O INCOMING Locatbn of Visit / Conference:

O OUTGOING MAasE OF PERSON (S) CONTACTED OR IN CONTACT ORGANIZATION (OMice, dept., tweau, TELEPHONE NO; WITH YOU *t e-)

-

FBI, k, %o T * * " "

3bNGS iLdikr t a BMntTr_nixlFMmimes I I

'

1 Lily OMhtt$e ! SYbHtM 011 AM)_ hesh SUMMARY i n 1 es]led Yt. Nb C OnEae

AOA d/We bAabtNnt i est h ~hhhh M3UDE-AW-DM -

-

Theau-w/ m,mL..bfs ml ;UInudoHee ArwamM/

.

ado whuin LD w L warkor wk humiks draa r>ui n12wlw DN6b wu a \

V

~

I f darkhtba BMY 4/t unl2HY t Y + (171{Y D 3 LW2 r b stl[a) we sea m AAAML1 %saAb122 aw$ 53AA 1 u)cEtY M Casset.ttsy

/

EM .

'

^ kNN AL L ndl 1 n2.mlul .%, 3 .M. 9MtFM - /dsf,s bro,ul 0/1A

.

-

--

-

i 9L M Ek #1 L M Le d/1 >" l L}i - 6 LAM A,., A L,D, c.,,,wa-

-

_

2 d Mr

-

'

i"1 LAlJ dat l&&I uwwu in ad //Ae site

-

i y

.

'

g', .,

ACTION REQUIRED

,Acek rtkttrn C , ndMeek,fMYb/terikbyff ckf, AhtC OF PtRSON DOCUMENTING CONVERSATION SIG URE DATE

h$$N C bN)cktertnv J ACTION TAKEN

_

--

$$& AJ88 " # '

h IAf siGMATURE TITLE DATE 50271-101

• oc i sut o . ut.sa (nm CONVERSATION RECORD ggi0,jA,L

, g QR g

-

cc : QC-84-03g Sg-s.4musy,.}

w__ cec-i&(n U o L Gak " -

FCIG 2b'500