IR 05000206/1984018
Text
. ' '., ',
(-
[
,...
The information on this pegs is censidsrad to be appropriate for public disclosure pursuant to 10 CFR 2.790 U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION V
l Report Nos.
50-206/84-18, 50-361/84-23 and 50-362/84-23 Docket Nos.
50-206,'50-361 and 50-362
'
License Nos.
DPR-13, NPF-10, NPF-15 Licensee:
Southern California Edison Company P. O. Box 800, 2244 Walnut Grove Avenue Rosemead, California 91770 Facility Name:
San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Units 1, 2 and 3 Inspection at:
Camp Pendleton, California Inspection conducted:
July 23-27, 1984
}
a, e
,
[8 ks b..< /J. [ Y Inspector:
I'<*
-
D. W. Schaefer, Physic 1 Security Inspector Datd Sikned Approved By: /M b M f N/IT H. D. Schuster, Acting Chief Date Signed Safeguards and Emergency Preparedness Branch Inspection Sunusary.
Areas Inspected: Follow-up on Information Notice 84-07; Security Events Follow-up; Safety / Security Assessment Report Follow-up; Security Organization-Personnel; Security Organization-Responser Security Program
,
Audit.; Testing and Maintenance; Physical Barriers-PA; Physical Barriers-VA; Security System Power Supply; Assessment Aids; Access control-Personnel; Access Control-Packages; Access Control-Vehicles; Detection Aids-PA; Detection Aids-VA; Alarm Stations; Communications; Physical Protection Safeguards Information; Independent Inspection Effort and Follow-up Items from previous security inspections.
The inspection was started during regular hours and involved 37 hours4.282407e-4 days <br />0.0103 hours <br />6.117725e-5 weeks <br />1.40785e-5 months <br /> onsite by one NRC inspector. Of the total, 6 inspection hours were accomplished during other than regular work hours.
Results: The licensee was found to be in compliance with NRC requirements within the areas inspected.
.
- L.
(
(
.
.
.
<
.
e e
.
.
.
.
g
.
.
.
.
P\\
.
s-1:
.1'
<
.
.
....?
..
,,
.
.
. -..
-
,...
,
<
-
l
_ _ _
b.
During this inspection, the licensee Medical Department briefed the inspector in detail on the processing of urinalysis samples.
Since January 1,1984, all new-hire personnel applying for any position within Southern California Edison (SCE) are required to successfully pass a urinalysis test. Each new-hire reports to the Medical Department and provide the required urine sample. Each sample is individually sealed (using medical " evidence" tape) and transported daily to CDL Laboratory in Tarzana California. Written results of each urinalysis are provided to 'the Medical Department within two days. The licensee -is present,1y staffing a proposal to expand this testing to all new-hire personnel (SCE and contract personnel) and further to conduct an annual urinalysis test of all personnel.
It.
is proposed that the urinalysis testing will be successfully completed prior to the initial issuance of the security unescorted access photo identification badge and annually thereafter prior to the reissuance of the security badge.
.
c.
On December 30, 1983, the SCIIGS Site Manager, in a letter to the
' Regional Administrator, Region V, NRC discussed plans for the replacement of the Unit 1 Esterline security computer. The licensee has completed an internal review and determination of all factors associated with expanding the Units 2/3 Honeywell Security computer Supamecsa m
.
.
-
--
"
-
w.
--
~
.
Q (
r-a
- ..
-
to Unit I to totally replace the existing Esterline Security Computer and to be able to control all plant securlty functions through a single computer system. The licensee provided the inspector with a copy of this April 18, 1984 internal review. This review concluded that the Honeywell system has sufficient memory and CPU capacity to accommodate the additional activities from Unit I with minimal risk of unacceptable degradation of system performance, and recommended expanding the Units 2/3 Honeywell Security Computer system to include Unit 1.
Discussion with the licensee during this inspection and again during the exit meeting confirmed that by August 15, 1984, the licensee will provide an implementation
{
,
schedule to Region V for expansion of the Honeywell computer to
.
Unit 1.
During the exit meeting, the inspector noted that froe
January 1 through July 20, 1984, the Unit 1 Esterline computer experienced 197 unscheduled stalls during which time the computer ceased to annunciate all Unit 1 VA alarms and all Unit 1 portals failed locked.
Even though each of these stalls averaged only 1-2 minutes in duration, they were very disruptive to personnel at Unit 1.
The inspector emphasized the need to replace the Unit 1
)
Esterline Security computer as soon as possible, thereby. increasing i
the Security Departments a pport to the safe operation of SONGS, Unit 1.
(50-361/84-23-01)
-
d.
On July 10, 1984, Mr. F. P. Eller, San Onofre Security Manager, telephonically reported to Region V information concerning a recent drug allegation at San Onofre.
SCE Corporate Security had interviewed a former Bechtel Foreman who had second hand knowledge of drug use at SONGS.
The Bechtel Foreman knew of another employee that has first hand knowledge and this information had been provided to Bechtel Power Company for further investigation.
This matter was discussed with the licensee during this inspection and the licensee reaffirmed their commitment to provide Region V with a copy of the completed Bechtel investigation.
50-361/84-23-02
I y
.
.
-
-_
_-
- __.
, u.s wontam mlcute.1ony couuissios ALLEGATION DATA FORM ace % scn trei,veter..arue.
4.
81888-I
.
RECEfVING CFFICE '
-
Docket Number (if applicable)
fjM 8 0 C
U
O b Fccifttylles) Involved:
fedemel8# /7 840 h Ms
/
C3 rrere then 3, or If o' s /,
/
puneris, orrite GENERICI I
5' o
-
[ b b
b 3 (c 'b
'
_
~
2. Functicmal Arestallnvolved:
I operetions
_
onsite health end safety scA d nep,op,'wie be.t )1 offsite health and safety
'
_,
construction
_. _,
,_
d safepuseds a
--
l L
other tspecity)
I
-
I A la/lol ISl Altel&l IA LEltels l61 lolid
{
lA l l l e iz l /,l e ll.1 131/ lf-le_I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Il s. description:
'
', " ' " " * ' ' ' ' * ' " ' * * '
IIIII1IIIIIIIIIII1]
IIIll III I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I il
'
i 4. Source of Allegation:
~~".
contractor employee security guerd
_,
,
(Check app,op'iste boal
_.
news media licensee employee
__.,
_
NRC employee
,_
private citizen
---
orge n1 ration isp.c6fylf6 Y W V (~ert ha e k r Em,s /s,o e 6 -
'
__
other ispecitst MM DD YY 5. Date Aftegation Received:
A *8 N " V
- "
-
5. Name of individual triest twe init:et end i.. nom 1
)
Receiving Allegation:
OS b/ TWf#Q i
.
7. Office:
ACTION OFFICE
3. Action Office Conteet:
trie ieweinut.i..ndi..inemet _
,
3 7l 7 g 9. FTS Telephone Number:
l9 g
,
IY v/
10. Status:
Open, if f ollowup actions are pendit.g er in progress Closed,if followup actions are completed Q
scheck one)
I,s/
MM DD W
<
11.1 D cument Nos.
-
11. Date Closed:
10 5 l0
~3 l & T
- eic ;o ;3 ic ;,i i, ;jl Iri< lcle i Iu<IThIlu,leiAlaI]
42. Rey.r s:
lo h 171E 10 l 18l A h 1 13 l,171r1 I l l l l \\llIIJ
.
,
,,,,,,,,
'
" * * '
-
$l$steQ029?uQGr*:t*t?O
, ' " ' -
c
- " ' ' '
R tl
~ $ 4 *
0 D ? N
'
t (p t&
._
_ _ - - _ - _ - _ - -
I
$
I fLW I REVISION
'O 8~
'
,
- f A()L il Y 1YPE :
OIM S DAT g Y FORM
- 1iPL Of CA5I:
'
fWp ((NR)
POWf R RI A(10R/D0f kil # o g post,J k, (((A) A15151 fir,lR) fiO' - POWI R RL AC10R/liAML
,, (viliD) VI NDDR/DOLEL1 #_,_M._,o g pp34 Q) INO.ilR[
-
1)llW151,16AllDN (MLIC) MAlERIAL t)tEfJ5E/NAME
_
(01H) 01HER
/
/NAME
- DATE OF RECEIPT: h M -84
-
,
_ _ _
--
- 11TLE: (Limit I racters)@rl Orihn - Dru/ arg. Alcz)hol. pg
'
.
-.
'6 Einpl04ess On1nA OfF ths. Sh
~
'
]NVEST]G TO INIT l ALS:
- LEA [ h
-
.
' CASE 51 ATUS:
SOURCE OF ALLEGA110N:
A ((0) OPEN (1)L]CENSEE (2) VEtiDOR
~ ~ ((5) PUBLIC
'
T) TRANSFERRED 6) INTERVENDR (C)) CLOSED / INACTIVE (3) CONTRACTOR (7) ANONYtiOUS (A CL OSED/ ACTIVE
'
(4) NRC
-
4[8{0THER
- FIEt WORK ST ATUS:
TYPE OF WROiGD0 LNG:
"'""l'"'*
(PN) PEND]NG
((FD) FALSE DOCUMENTS
~ ((FA) FIELD WORK IN ABEYANCE
.
,
FP) FIELD WORi: l'i PROGRESS FS) FALSE STATEMENTS HI) HAPASSi1ENT/ INTIMIDATION (FC) TIELO WORK COMPLETE RR) REPORTING REQUIREMENTS (DR) DRAFT REPORT'
(HR) HEADQUARTER REVIEW
@ OT) OTHER dn14 lal&)1cf y39
.
J'
(FR) FINAL REPORT ISSUED DESCRIP110N: (Limit 500 Cha r6cters)
An anonynwus alIceer calIcd thc. NPC nesIber&.Tnspector*s frict. and allt6ed +nd Sar+IsH NutitM emPIOVeto W bringing iri druds and alcohol into
+he proteded. arce et s0Nes.
CO.%:.15/ REMARKS: (Limit 500 Characters)
G544-00L
START DATE:
f-2 4 '64-FIELD OFFICE :
67.86V E511 MATED COMPL E110N DATE: /h)C/)Dgg_
ALLEGATION NUMBER '
'. ' A.
AC10AL C0KPLET10N DA1E:
FACILITY ZIP CODE:_
l
.
_
_
ALL RFLAlE) CASF5:
RE FERRAL :
i OS t'edAO E00 (RS) REGION 5 I
l
'
g HQ 01A k *
(Rl) REGION 1 DOJ l
(R2) REGION 2 LAW INF
/
'
(R3) REGION 3 FBI E
(R4) REGION 4 OTHER FOIA:
- '
h bm. 3 a
eREQUIRED ELEMWT T4
"##
"'
"I
$
- - _ _
._- - _ _
,
,
,
%W-OoLD CONVERSATION RECORD
'f,'g g g,,4
^/, ut g gp/
"
""
O vis T
_ O CONFERENCE P ONE NAME/sMOL INT O INCOMING Locatbn of Visit / Conference:
O OUTGOING MAasE OF PERSON (S) CONTACTED OR IN CONTACT ORGANIZATION (OMice, dept., tweau, TELEPHONE NO; WITH YOU
- t e-)
FBI, k, %o TT.S
-
- * " "
3bNGS iLdikr a BMntTr_nixlFMmimes t
I I
1 Lily OMhtt$e SYbHtM 011 AM)_ hesha.
'
!
SUMMARY i
1 es]led Yt. Nb C OnEae AOA d/We bAabtNnt i est h ~hhhh n
M3UDE-AW-DM Theau-w/ m,mL..bfs ml ;UInudoHee ArwamM/
-
-
ado whuin LD w L warkor wk humiks draa r>ui n12wlw DN6b wu a\\
.
V
~
I Y + (171{Y b
f unl2HY darkhtba BMY 4/t t
D
LW2 r stl[a)
we sea m a.
AAAML %saAb122 aw$ 53AA 1 u)cEtY
M Casset.ttsy
/
EMD..
.
kNN
'^
AL L ndl 1 n2.mlul.%, 3.M. 9MtFM /dsf,s bro,ul 0/1A
.
i
-
--
-
-
9L M Ek 2 d Mr L}i - 6 LAM A,., A L,D, c.,,,wa-
- 1 L M
-
Le d/1
>"
l
_
-
'
i"1 LAlJ dat l&&I uwwu in ad //Ae site
-
i y
.
g',
.,
'
ACTION REQUIRED C, ndMeek,fMYb/terikbyff ckf,
,Acek rtkttrn AhtC OF PtRSON DOCUMENTING CONVERSATION SIG URE DATE h$$N C bN)cktertnv Ja.
_
$$&
AJ88
ACTION TAKEN
--
"
'
h IAf siGMATURE TITLE DATE 50271-101
- oc i sut o. ut.sa (nm CONVERSATION RECORD ggi0,jA,L QR
-
cc : QC-84-03g Sg-s.4musy,.}
,
g g
( cec-i&(n U o L Gak "
FCIG 2b'500 w__
-