IR 05000361/1998002
| ML20247D314 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | San Onofre  |
| Issue date: | 03/11/1998 |
| From: | NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20247D313 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-361-98-02, 50-361-98-2, 50-362-98-02, 50-362-98-2, NUDOCS 9805150003 | |
| Download: ML20247D314 (2) | |
Text
_
_-_ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ - _ - _ - _ - _
_-
ENCLOSURE
!
!:
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION IV
Docket Nos.:
50-361; 50-362 License Nos.:
50-361/98-02; 50-362/98-02
-
Licensee:
' Southern California Edison Co.
!
Facility:
San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Units 2 and 3 i
Location:
5000 S. Pacific Coast Hwy.
'
San Clemente, Califomia
,
Dates:
February 9-13, 1998 Inspector (s):
A. Bruce Eamest, Physical Security Specialist Plant Support Branch Approved By:
!
'
Bleine Murray, Chief, Plant Support Branch
,
Division of Reactor Safety Attachment:
Supplemental Information l-I
!
!
!-
i
!
I I
l
,
f l
9905150003 980311
~
PDR ADOCK 05000361 G
pm
_
--__-___m__._.m.
_
.-
i l
\\
e
)
-
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Units 2 and 3 l
NRC Inspection Report 50-361/98-02; 50-362/98-02 This routine, announced inspection focused on the licensee physical security program. The
,
areas inspected included review of alarm stations, communications, personnei and vehicle j
access control, vital area barriers, vital area detection aids, emergency power supply,
'
records and reports, and the security organization. Overall, a continued slight downward program performance trend was noted. Good performance was observed in certain program areas.
Plant Support The alarm stations were well protected, and the operators in the central alarm station
-
!
were alert and efficient (Section S1.1).
.
'
l Communications problems were identified with the responding local law enforcement
-
agency (Section S1.2).
A noncited violation was identified involving inadequate searches of a vehicle and an
-
employee (Section S1.3).
The vital area barriers were adequate. A concern was idantified involving
-
unescorted / uncompensated uso of personnel boom trucks that could allow unauthorized access to vitel areas (Section S2.1).
The vital area detection aids were adequate to detect an intruder attempting to enter
-
the vital areas (Section S2.2).
A significant port %n of the perimeter detection system would not provide a " standby
-
power" indication in the alarm stations if the system suffered a power loss (Section S2.3).
A very good safeguards event reporting system was in place (Section S3.1).
A good security organization capable of meeting security and contingency plan
-
requirements was in place (Section S6.1).
,
l
_ _ - _ _ _ - _ - - - _