IR 05000206/1985015

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Partially Deleted Physical Security Insp Repts 50-206/85-15, 50-361/85-14 & 50-362/85-13 on 850415-19.No Noncompliances Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Physical barriers-vital Areas, IE Info Notice 85-004,alarm Stations & Communications
ML20236C764
Person / Time
Site: San Onofre  Southern California Edison icon.png
Issue date: 05/03/1985
From: Schaefer D, Schuster M
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V)
To:
Shared Package
ML20236C515 List:
References
FOIA-86-500 50-206-85-15, 50-361-85-14, 50-362-85-13, IEIN-85-004, IEIN-85-4, NUDOCS 8710270324
Download: ML20236C764 (2)


Text

_...., - -

%

c.7tSN

.

..

The information en this page is ccasidered to be appropriate

for public disclosure pursuant to 10 CFR '2.790 U.~ S. NUCLEAR REGUIATORY COMMISSION REGION V:

Report Nos.

50-206/85-15, 50-361/85-14, 50-362/85-13 Docket'Nos.

50-206, 50-361,'50-362 License Nos.

DPR-13, NPF-10, NPF-15

-

Licensee:

Southern California Edison Company P. O. Box 800, 2244 Walnut Grove Avenue Rosemead, California 91770 Facility Name:

San Onofre Nuclear Generatina Station, Units 1, 2 and 3 Inspection at:

Camp Pendleton, California i

Inspection conducted:

April 15 - 19, 1985 I

Dates of Last Physical Security Inspection: February 11 through 15, 27, 28 and March 1, 1985 Type of Inspection:

Routine, Unannounced Physical Security

.

'

l s

Inspector:

M 4/

w 3. IS~

D. W. Schaefer, Phy ical Security Inspector Date/ Si'gned Approved Bf: hh

.Y. N

'

M. D. Schuster, Chief, Safeguards Section Date Signed i

.

Inspection Summary:

l

,

Areas Inspected: Security Event Follow-up; Physical Barriers-Vital Areas (Units 2 and 3); lighting; Detection Aids-Tital Areas (Units 2 and 3); Alarm Stations; consunications; Independent Inspection Effort (Allegation i

No. RV-84-A-0092); Information Notice 85-04; and Follow-up Items from previous security inspections and assessments.

The inspection was started during regular hours and involved 36 hours4.166667e-4 days <br />0.01 hours <br />5.952381e-5 weeks <br />1.3698e-5 months <br /> onsite by one NRC inspector. Of the total, four inspection hours were accomplished during other than regular work hours.

Results: The licensee was found to be in compliance with NRC requirements within the areas examined during the inspection.

8710270324 871022 PDR FDIA

_CARLTON86-500 PDR

-

...

e e=,e**=e y

__

_

_ _ _. _ _. _ _ _ _. _ _ _. _ _ _ - - -

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

-

_ - - _ _ _

_ _ _

_

!

,,..

-

-

-

' '4

.

..

A

'

..

~. --

..

<

,

\\

.

-!

.

.

d

/V i

ia

,

.

l

.

.

.

.

. w.'..u.._w3 '

.3

&

-

<:.-

,,

.

HC-92706 Independent Inspection Effort

_

.u.

s S% Y '.

.

. d *.

4.

Bo violations' vere identified.

A11eastion Number RV-84-A-092 On August 20, 1984, an anonymous male

!

(alleger) telephonically contacted NRC Region V with information Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS). pertaining to alleged onsite

-

employed at SONGS for Bartlett Nuclear -(a health physics con

':

acquired information that Bartlett employees were bringing drugs and

,

, he alcohol into the protected area inside containers labeled as "Radwaste

'

! t Eample -' Sewer Sample" and that Security. Officers never opened these{

sample containers.

The alleger also reported that specifically named i

site employees would frequently consume alcohol during lunch breaks esaure then unfit for duty at SONGS.

.

had previously reported this same information to SONGS mana esticials.

en august 29, 1984, the NRC orally referred this matter to the FBI, San klingo California.

IN0fE:

The FBI has criminal investigative jurisdiction at sollGS since the site'is located on Federal property )

heemmber 28, 1984, the Region V Field office, Office of Investigations On

.

t M a Report of Inquiry to the FBI, San Diego California.

'

that time, Region V withheld conducting any special inspections i t

,

Since e-

-- allegations so as not to interfere with the FBI's investigative no

      • -ts.

em Fatsmary 12, 1985, h, Drug Enforcenest Agency (DEA) for their review and

.h.

rE m management and was provided a copy of th

,

.

inum= eigation and corrective actions.

As a result of these efforts, severalTheir investigati tuaromagh and adequate.

adhuc:aristrative changes were completed to include a reorganization of e