ML20236C511

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Final Response to FOIA Request for Documents Re Drug Use at Plant.Apps A,B & D Documents Encl & in Pdr.App B & D Records Partially Withheld (Ref FOIA Exemptions 5,6 & 7).App C,E & F Documents Totally Withheld (Ref FOIA Exemptions 4,5 & 7)
ML20236C511
Person / Time
Site: San Onofre  Southern California Edison icon.png
Issue date: 10/22/1987
From: Grimsley D
NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION & RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (ARM)
To: Carlton J
AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED
Shared Package
ML20236C515 List:
References
FOIA-86-500 NUDOCS 8710270230
Download: ML20236C511 (12)
v • d • e


Text

j .

F01A-86-500

[**mg%, ,

' g , y as ONs m E E RESPONSE TO FREEDOM OF I I / Xl**" l I '*'"

^

INFORMATION ACT (FO!A) REQUEST (e seee OCT 2 21987 DOCKET NUW6tRi$) Ur oppite6 del IEOutSTER Carlton Jim s PART 4.-RECORDS RELEASED OR NOT LOCATED (See checked bones)

No egency records subpoet to the request have been located.

No additional egency recorde subsect to the request have been located.

Agency records subsect to the request that are identified in Appendix are skesdy aveasbie for public inspection and copying in the NRC Public Docurnent Room, 1717 H Street, N W., Washington, DC.

Agency records subject so the request that are Identified in Appendix A* a,e boo,g made ,v.iiabin fo, pubiie inspection and copying in the NRC Pubiic Document X Room, 57 7 N St,esi, N.w., washington, DC, in . foider under this FOlA number and requester name.

The nonproprietary verson of the proposaHs) that you agreed to accept in a telephone conversetson with a memtier of my staff is now being made avalable for pubiic irupaction and coying at the NRC Public Document Room,1717 H Street, N W., Washington, DC, in a fokser under this FOIA number and requester name.

X Enclosed is informauon on how you rnay obtain access to and the charges for copying records pieced in the NRC Pubhc Document Room,1717 H Street, N.W., Washingen. DC.

igency records subpect to the request are enclosed. Any applicable charge for copees of the recoros provkfed and payment procedures are noted in the comments section.

X Records subst to the request have been referred to another Federal agencyties) for review aruj drect respones to you.

In view of NRC's response to this request, no further action is being taken on appeal letter deced PART ll.A-INFORMATION WITHHELD FROed PtJSUC DISCLOSURE Certain inforrnaton s the requested records le being withheld from pubiic disclosure pursuant to the FOIA exemptions described in and for the reasons stated in Part II, see-X tions e, e, nd D. Any ,sicased po,t no of ine documents fo, wnich on,y pa,1 of ine ,eco,d is being wiinheid .,e being made . .iiabie fo, pubiac inspection .nd co,,e,g in th) NRC Public Documerit Room,1717 H Street, N.W., Washington, DC, in a folder under Wes FOIA number and requester name.

Comments q The records identified on Appendix F at numbers 1.b. and 2 are self-critical analysis records prepared for Southern California Edison Company and voluntarily provided to the NRC. The public disclosure of these records could impair the NRC's ability to receive similar information in the future. Accordingly, the NRC is withholding these records from release pursuant to Exemption 4 of the FOIA.

n

$/ (ATjRE. DIRECTOR Drvis O# OF Rut [$jND RE DS R76k0.> Y f(i l

s 8710270230 871022 PDR FDIA CARLTONB6-500 PDR - _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ - _

FIEEDOM CF INFORMATION ACT RESPONSE ' FOIA NUMBEMSI- F0fA-86-500 DATE: OCT 2 2 N PART ll.B- APPLICABLE FOIA EXEMPTIONS Records subject to the request that are described es the enclosed Appendices .b(404E & J are being withheed in their entirety or in part under FOIA Ex:mptions and for the reasons set forth below pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552(b) and 10 CFR 9.5(a) of NRC Regulations.

l 1

1. The withheld information is property etensified pwsum to Emacutwo Order 12366 (EXEMPTION 1)
2. The Mthheld inforrnation rotates soiefy to the intemed personnel rules and procedures of NRC. (EXEMPTION 2)
3. The withheld information is epocifically enernpted from public dectosure by statute indicated:- (EXEMPTION 3) hjj Section 141146 of the Atomic Enert,y Act wrech prohitNts the disclosure of Restncted Data >or Formerty Restricted Data +42 U.S.C. 21612106).

Section 147 of the Atomic Energy Act which proMets the doctosure of Unclassified Safeguards information (42 U.S.C. 2167L X 4. Th* *'thh*'d 'a'a'**5oa ' *d* **c *' ca**"' ' 'ia'aci "' '***a 'h*' 6*iao *ithh*'d 'o' 'h* '*eson(s) indceemd: (EXEMPTION 4)

The information is considered to be confidentist tmaness (proprwtary) information. i 1

The information is considered to be propnetary oformation pursuant to 10 CFR 2.790(d)(1).

l 7g W.x The information was submitted and received h cordidence from a foreign source pursuant to 10 CFR 2.790(d)(2L

[ 6. The wtthheld bformation consists of interagency er hersagency records that m not evenable through discovery d would tend to inhbit the open and frank eschenge of adees essenmal to the deliberative process. Where records are litigatorL Declosure of predecisionalinformation sheM in teir entirety, the facts are inextricably intertw6ned with the predecisional information. There ateo are no reemonably esgregable factual portions because the release of the facts would permit an indirect inquiry into the predecemones process of die egency. (EXEMPTION 5) y 6. The withheld information is exempted from public docsosure because its disclosure would result in a clearty unwarranted irmasson of personal privacy. (EXEMPTION 6) y 7, The withheld information consists of imestigatory records cornpaed for law enforcement purposes and is being withheld for the eneson(s) indicated. (EXEMPTION 7) -

s Disclosure would interfere with en enforcement proceedmg because it could reveal the scope, direction. and focus of enforcement efforts. and thus could posest#y allow them to take action to shacid poerr'tnel wrongdoeng or a violation of NRC requirements from investigators. , EXEMPTION 71AH k

Disclosure would const6tute an urmerrented swesian of personal privacy (EXEMPTION 7(CH y The information consets of names of individuals and other eformation the declosure of which would reveal identities of con 6dential sources. (EXEMPTION 7(00 PART ll.C-DENYING OFFICIALS Pursuant to 10 CFR 9.9 and/or 9.15 of the U.S. Nuclear Rapietory Commesson regulations, it has been determined that the information witPfald is exempt from production or disclosure, and that its production or dieciosure le contrary to the pdec enerest The persons responsible for the denial are those officials 6dentifad below as denying officials and the Director, j Otvision of Rules and Records, Off6cs of Administration, for any deruels that may be appeated to the Executive Director for Opersoors moot DENYING OFFICIAL TITLE / OFFICE RECOROS DENiiD APPELLATE OFFICIAL SECRETARY EDO John B. Martin Regional Administrator Appendices B,C & F X  ;

Region V Ben B. Hayes Director Office of e Appendices D and E X Investigations PART ll D- APPEAL RIGHTS The denial by each denying official identified in Part li.C may be appealed to the Appellate Official identified in that section. Any such appeal must be in writing and must be made within 30 days of recee of this respones. Appeals must be addressed as appropriate to the Emecutive Director for Operations or to th@ Secretary of the Commismon. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comrnission, Washington, DC 20555, and should clearty state on the envelope and in the letter that it is an " Appeal from an initial FOLA Decimon."

see poIM ese trert a U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION e ssi FOlA RESPONSE CONTINUATION

Re: F01A-86-500 APPENDIX A RECORDS BEING PLACED IN THE PDR

1. Undated Title sheet, Case No. QS-84-032 entitled, " SONGS - Drug and Alcohol Use by Bartlett Nuclear Employees On and Off the Site". (2 pages) ,
2. Undated Allegation Data Fom, Allegation No. RV-84-A-120 (01  !

Report No. Q-5-84-038-004. (1 page) l

3. Undated OIMIS Data Entry Form concerning Case No. QS-84-038-001.

(1page)

4. Undated Allegation Data Fom, Allegation No. RV-84-A-120 (Updated ,

5/29/85).(1page)

5. Undated Allegation Data For, Allegation No. RV-84-A-120. (1 page)
6. Various Investigation Status Record, Case No. QS-85-2020. (1 page)
7. Various Investigation Status Record, Case No. QS-84-032. (2 pages)  ;

Dates l

8. Various Investigation Status Record, Case No. QS-84-038. (1 page)

Dates

9. 12/5/83 Letter from the Nuclear Regulatory Comission to southern i Californis Edison Company, re: NRC Security Inspection -  !

San Onofre Nuclear Gererating Stations, Units 1, 2, and 3. l (8pages)

10. 3/27/84 Allegation Data Input Docket No. 50-361. (1 page)
11. 3/27/84 Allegation File Checklist Input Sheet. (1 page)
12. 8/15/84 Letter from Schuster to Baskin, subject: NRC Security '

Inspection - San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Units 1, 2, and 3. (5 pages) NOTE: Portions deleted are outside '

scope of request.

13. 8/20/84 Allegation Data Fom (1 page). ,
14. 8/24/84 OIMIS Data Entry Fons. (1 page) QS-84-032. )

i q

i l

t ------.--------_---J

~

a ..

Re: F0IA-86-500 l APPENDIX A .

(Continued)

RECORDS BEING PLACED IN THE PDR

15. 8/24/84 Conversation' Record (1 page).- QS-84-020.
16. 8/31/84 Memorandum from J.B. Martin to 0. Shackleton, re:

Allegation 84-A-0092. (1 page)

17. 9/17/84- Memorandum from M.D. Schuster to 0. Shackleton, re:

Alcohol / Drug Abuse at SONGS, Allegation RV-84-0092. (1 page) 18, 9/20/84 Allegation' File Completion Checklist,- File No. 1 RV-84-A-0048. (1page)'

19. 11/30/84 Memorandum from M.D. Schuster to 0. Shackleton, re:  !

Alcohol / Drug Abuse at SONGS, Allegation RV-84-0092. (1 page)

20. 12/28/84 Allegation File Completion Checklist File No. 84-A-120.  !

(1page) j

21. 12/28/84 Memorandum from 0.C. Shackleton to J.B. P.artin, re: San -)

j Onofre Invoolved- Allegations Naming in Drug Activity (Three SCE1page)

Q5-84-038). Emp(loyees as Being l- 22, 5/3/85 Allegation File Completion Checklist 84-A-092. (1 page) 23, 5/13/85 Letter from Montgomery to Baskin, subject: NRC Security

, Inspection - San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 1, 2, and 3 (5 pages). NOTE: Portions Deleted are outside scope of request. J 1

24. 7/5/85 Note to K1 sch re: 01 Reports of Inquiry QS-84-020 &

QS-84-032(1page). NOTE: Portions Deleted are Outside Scope of Request.

25. 7/9/85 Notes of Owen C. Shackleton, Jr., QS-84-020, SONGS 2-A11egations of Drug Usage. (1 page) l 1
26. 7/14/85 Memorandum from M.D. Schuster to Allegation File, ATS l RV-84-A-120, re: Telephone conversation pertaining to 1 Allegation RV-84-A-120 (01 Inquiry QS-84-038). (1 page) 1
27. 7/17/85 Memorandum from Ross A. Scarano to Allegation File, ATS i RV-05-A-039, re: Dis QS-84-020. (1 page)positionofOIReportofInquiry l
28. 7/17/85 Memorandum from Ross A. Scarano to Allegation File, ATS l RV-84-A-120, re: Dis QS-84-038. (1 page) position of 01 Report of Inquiry

Re: FOIA-86-500 APPENDIX A (Continued)

RECORDS BEING PLACED IN THE PDR

29. 7/17/85- Memorandum from Scarano to Allegation File, ATS RV-84-A-  !

120, re: Disposition of 01 Report of In .

w/ additional handwritten note. (1 page)quiry QS-84-038 {

30. 4/19/86 Allegation Data Input, re: RV-86-A-0037.(1page)
31. 4/29/86 Allegation Data Input, re: RV-86-A-0037.(1page) 32, 5/21/86 Allegation File Completion Checklist RV-86-A-0037. (1 page)
33. 5/21/86 Memorandum from Allegation Board to Allegation File, RV-86-A-0037, re: Disposition of Allegation. (1 page) i 1
34. 6/12/86 Letter from Haynes 'a Martin, subject: Docket Nos.

50-206, 50-361 & SC 342, San Onofre Nuclear Generating  :

Station, Units 1,* , and 3. (2 pages)  ;

35. 6/11/84 Memo f'or File (SG-4-6, Allegation 84-A-0048) from L.R. l Norderhaug, subject: Allegation Panel. (#84-A-0048). (1 page) j
36. 7/5/84 Memo for T.W. Bishop thru Schuster from D.W. Schaefer, subject: A11egation No. RV-A-83-044 - San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS). (2 pages)  !
37. Undated Memo for 0.C. Shackleton from J.B. Martin, subject:

Allegation Tracking System No. RV-83-A-0044. (2 pages)

38. 8/10/83 Newspaper article, San Onofre Guards Flunk Drug Tests. (4 pages)  ;

l J

I

! l

__________________~

. r s

Re: F01A-86-500-APPENDIX'B'~ i l

RECORDS PARTIALLY WITHHELD 1.. '5/18/84 Allegation Report San Onofre. (1 page) Portions, l Exemption 7(D).

2. 5/18/84 Allegation Data Form RV-84-A-0048. (1 page) Portions, Exemption 7(C).
3. 7/13/84 Memo from Schaefer to File (PP-2-1) re: . Drug Allegation ,

at SONGS (1 page) Exemption (6). i l.

4.- 7/18/84 Memo from Schaefer to Bishop, re: Allegation No.

. RV-A-83-044, San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station ,

.(SONGS). (3 ) ages) Note: page 1 and 2 are duplicates w/different handwritten notations which are deleted. l Portions, Exemption 5. l

5. 8/20/84 Allegation Report re SONGS (2 pages) Exemption 7(D). .

I Withheld in Entirety

Attachment:

a. 8/22/84 Facsimile Conversheet (1 page) - Released, i

6, 8/22/84 Memorandum from A.D. McQueen to File, re: Annonymous l Allegations' Regarding. Controlled Substance Activity at the  !

l San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS) (2 pages), '

! w/ attached Action Plan (2 pages) -' Portions - Ex. 6, 7C &

70.

7. 8/24/84 Memo from McQueen to F'.le re: Alcohol / Drug Abuse at SONGS, Allegation RV-84-0092 (2 pages) w/ attached Action Plan (2 pages) - Portions, Exemptions 6, 7(c) and.7(D).
8. 8/28/84 Letterfre..-aynestoMartin(2pages)-PortionsEx.6 w/ attachments:
a. 8/17/84 Letter from McClusky to Nunn (2 pages)-

Portions - Ex. 6

b. 7/26/84 LetterfromColetoA11eger(1page)- ,

Portions - Ex. 6 4

9. 9/20/84 Memorandum from L.R. Norderhaug to T.W. Bishop, re:

l Allegation No. RV-84-A-0048, San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS)(1page)-Released, attachment: 9/20/84 Ltr from Scarno (1 page) Portions. Exemption 7(D). i

10. 12/28/84 Memo from Shackleton to Martin, subject: San Onofre -

Allegations naming three SCE Employees as Being Involved in Drug Activity. (Q5-84-038) Handwritten notations are deletedunderEx.(5)(1page)

L__-___________

Re: F01A-86-500 APPENDIX B 1 (Continued) l RECORDS PARTIALLY WITHHELD 11, 5/3/85 Memo from Schaefer to File (Allegation No. RV-84-A-092) I re SONGS Allegation (2 pages) Portions Exemptions 6 & 7(D). i

12. 7/15/85 Memorandum from M.D. Schuster to Allegation File, ATS RV-84-A-120, re: Telephone Conversations Pertaining to 'l Allegation RV-84-A-120 (0I Inquiry QS-84-038) (1 page).

Portions, Exemptions 6 and 7(C).

13. 7/17/85 Allegation File Completion Checklist, RV-85-A-039 ~(1 -!

page). Portions, Exemption 7(D). l

14. 7/29/85 Allegation Tracking System Input Sheet, SONGS-2, DN-50-361 (1 page). Exemption 7(D). RV-85-A-039.
15. 4/25/86 Allegation Report #86-A-0037 SONGS (1 page). Portions, Exemption 6 & 7(C).
16. 5/2/86 Allegation Report #86-A-0031 (1 page). Portions, 3 Exemptions 6 & 7(C). j
17. 5/2/86 Allegation Report San Onofre #86-A-0032 (1 page).

Portions, Exemptions 6, 7(C) and 7(D).

18, 5/2/86 Allegation Cata Input, RV-86-A-0032. (1 page) Portions, j Exemptions 6 and 7(C).

j

19. 5/2/86 Allegation Data Input, RV-86-A-0031. (1 page). Portions-Exemption 7(D).  !

l 4

1 i

Re: F01A-86-500 l

APPENDIX C RECORD TOTALLY WITHHELD.

(Exemption 7(D)

1. 8/21/84 Allegation Data Fonn (1 page) w/ attachment:
a. 8/21/84_ Allegation Report (4 pages) (QS-84-032) i k

i

q Re: F01A-86-500 d APPENDIX D PORTIONS OF RECORDS DELETED EXEMPTIONS

1. 3/27/84 Memo for Hayes from Schuetze, subject: 6, 7C

' Allegations - San Onofre (1 page)

2. -4/13/84 Case Chronology of San Onofre - Allegations 6, 7C l ofDrugUsageatUnit2.(2pages) j
3. 5/9/84 LtrfromOwenC.Shackleton(1page) Portions 6, 7C 4.- 8/24/84 Case Chronology of San Onofre - Drug Portions 6, 7C & 70 .

and Alcohol Use by Bartlett Nuclear  !

EmployeesOnandOffSite(2.pages)

5. 8/24/84 Results of Interview Form by Owen C. Portions 6, 7C & 70  !

Shackleton, Jr. (6 pages)

.6. 11/1/84 ConversationRecord(1page) Portions 7C

7. 12/17/84 Conversation Record (1 page) Portions 7C
8. 12/17/84 ConversationRecord(1page) Portions 7C
9. 12/21/84 Case Chronology of San Onofre - Allegation 7C 1 Naming Three SEC Employees as Being I Involved in Drug Activity (2 pages)
10. 12/28/84 01:RIV Portions 6 & 7C ReortonInquiryby(2pagesf Fi e No. QS-84-020
11. 12/28/84 OI:RIV Portions 6 & 7C ReortonInquiryby(6pages}

F1 e No. QS-84-038

12. 12/28/84 Report on Inquiry by OI:RIV, Portions 6 & 7C & 70 FileNo.QS-84-032(6pages)
13. 12/28/84 Memo for Martin from Shackleton, Portions 6 & 7C 3 subject: SONGS Unit 2 - Allegations of Drug Usage (QS-84-020) (1 page)
14. 12/28/84 Memo for Martin from Shackleton, Portions 7C & 70
subject
SONGS-Allegations of Drug and Alcohol Use by the Bartlett Nuclear Employees On and Off the Site (QS-84-032)

Region V ATS. No. RV-84-A-0092 (2 pages)

Re: f01A-86-500 APPENDIX D (Continued) {

15. 12/28/84: Letter to FBI from Shackleton, Portions 7C subject: SONGS-Allegations of Drug and Alcohol Use by the Bartlett Nuclear Employees On and Off.the Site (QS-84-032)

RegionVATSNo.RV-84-A-0092.(2pages) l 16, 12/28/84 Letter to FBI from Shackleton,- Portions 7C t subject: San Onofre Nuclear Generating  !

Station Unit 2 - Allegations of Drug .

. Usage (QS-84-020)(1page)  !

17. 1/9/85 ConversationRecord(1page) Portions 7C
18. 10/7/85 ConversationRecord(2pages) Portions 6, 7C & 7D i 19. Undated Memo for Allegation File from Portions 6.-7C "

)

Allegation Board Panel, subject:

SONGS-Allegation an Unknown SCE Employee Working in [ ] is using cocaine on site: Disposition ofAllegation(1page) i  !

i. l i  !

l i

f

\

i i

i i

i

- - _ _ - _ - _ _ _ l

4 I

Re: F01A-86-500 I

APPENDIX E RECORDS DENIED IN ENTIRETY'

1. 8/21/84 MemotoFilereTelephoneConversation(3-pages) Exemption 7D ..

2.- Undated DraftMemofromScarano(1page) Exemption 5.

I I

I

'l l

l l \

1 l

l l

i i

i Re: FOIA-86-500- '!

APPENDIX F l Exemptions ,

1. 3/21/84' a. Letter from Haynes Southern -

California Edison Company to J.B. Martin, NRC, (RV-83-A-044)

-(3 pages) - Released

b. Attachr,ent dated 10/23/84 Summary Report (19 pages)

Denied in Entirety (4)

2. 8/22/84 Problems Review Report - SONGS Units 1/2/3 w/ attachments:

8/22/84 Memo from Schone to Kreiger 10/11/84 Memo from Schone to Talley 10/23/84 Memo from Kelly <

10/24/84 Memo to Talley ,

10/31/84 Muclear Safety Concern Request for Independent Review 10/31/84 Memo from Schone to Talley (13 pages)

Denied in Entirety (4)-

l

y' w-1 - .l,. /pcne UNITED STATES

[}(f /g g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION -

g -l REG 40N V

.. g c 1450 MARIA LAWE.sulTE 210

%s[o*

, WALNUT CREEK, CALIFORNIA 1,4596

....a DEC 051983 Docket Nos. 50-206 5-50-362 -j l l

I Southern California Edison Company P. O. Box 800 2244 Walnut Grove Avenue Rosemead, California 91770 Attention: Mr. Charles B. McCarthy, Jr., Vice President  !

Advanced Engineering Gentlemen: '

Subject:

NRC Security Inspection - San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Units 1, 2 and 3 This letter refers to the Special Safeguards inspection of your activities at San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Units 1, 2, and 3 authorized under NPC '

License Nos. DPR-13, NPF-10 and NPF-15 conducted by Mr. D. W. Schaefer of 1 this office on October 31 through November 4, and November 14-15, 1983. It also refers to the discussion of our inspection findings held by the inspector with Mr. W. C. Moody and members of the San Onofre staff on November 4 and 15,1983.

The inspection included examination of activities related to your program for i physical protection against radiological sabotage and against theft of special nuclear material in accordance with applicable requirements of Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 73, " Physical Protection of Plants and Materials", your security plan, and licensee conditions pertaining to the physical protection as described in"f.he enclosed inspection report, Within these areas, the inspection consistdd of selective examination of procedures and records, interviews with facility personnel and observations by the inspector.

,, Within the scope of this inspection no violations were identified.

In accordance with the Section 2.790(d) of the NRC's " Rules of Practice",

Part 2, Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, documentation of findings of your security procedures are exempt from disclost:re; therefore, the enclosed inspection report will not be placed in the public document room.

, e i ,

m ev. E A m a n, WW .

f

(

I' '

(.

3 Southern California Edison Company 2 b lh83 We have determined that the enclosed inspection report contains Safeguards Information and is therefore subject to the controls of 10 CFR 73.21.

L Should you have any questions concerning this letter, we will be glad to i discuss them with you.

1

!. Sincerely, n =2 LeRoy R._

Nor rhaug, Chic k Safeguards and Emergency Preparedness Branch

Enclosure:

Inspection Report Nos. 50-206/83-23 50-361/83-38 50-362/83-36 (IE-V-596) cc w/ enclosures:

D. J. Fogarty, Executive Vice President '

Nuclear Engineering and Operations l J. G. Haynes, Station Manager, SONGS F. P. Eller, Manager, Station Security, SONGS l

l l

l l

i 1

- _ _ _ _ - _ . _ - _ _ _ _ - . . . - - . _

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20236C511&oldid=3252685"