IR 05000361/1997024

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Partialy Withheld Insp Repts 50-361/97-24 & 50-362/97-24 on 971117-21 & 1203-05 (Ref 10CFR73.21).Violations Being Considered for Ea.Major Areas Inspected:Physical Security Program
ML20247H396
Person / Time
Site: San Onofre  Southern California Edison icon.png
Issue date: 12/24/1997
From:
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To:
Shared Package
ML20247H362 List:
References
50-361-97-24, 50-362-97-24, NUDOCS 9805210154
Download: ML20247H396 (2)


Text

_ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - _ - _ _

.

I l

l DOCUMENT CONTAINS ENCLOSURE l

'

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

REGION IV

Docket Nos.: 50-361; 50-362 License Nos.: NPF-10; NPF-15 Report No.: 50-361/97-24; 50-362/97-24 Ucensee: Southem Califomia Edison C Facility: San Onofre Nucfear Generating Station, Units 2 and 3 Location: 5000 S. Pacific Coast Hwy.

l San Clemente, Califomia '

Dates: November 17-21 and December 3-5,1997 Inspecto A. B. Eamest, Security Specialist, Plant Support Branch Approved By: Blaine Murray, Chief, Plant Support Branch Division of Reactor Safety Attachment: SupplementalInformation i

DOCUMENT CbNTAINS ENCLOSURE (S) CONTAIN(S) UPON SEPARATION THIS l PAGE IS DECONTROLLED l 9805210154 971224 PDR ADOCK 05000361

G PDR a____ . _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .__ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ }

,

. . .

,

,

-2- DOCUMENT CONTAINS

' EXECUTIVE SUMMARY San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Units 2 and 3 NRC Inspection Report 50-361/97-24; 50-362/97-24 This routine, announced inspection focused on the licensee physical security program. The areas inspected included review of access control- personnel, access control- packages, emergency power supply, compensatory measures, records and reports, protection of safeguards information, and security of contingency weapon Plant Support

- Personnel access to the protected area was controlled in an effective manner (Section S1.1).

- The program for searching handcarried packages and material was effective (Section S1.2).

- An apparent violation was identified involving the failure to provide backup power supply to a portion of the detection aids system (Section S2.1).

- An apparent violation was identified involving inadequate compensatory measures during three failures of the security computer system (Section S2.2).

L - An apparent violation was identified involving the failure to correctly report safeguards

!

events (Section S3.1).

l

- An apparent violation was identified involving the failure to adequately protect a copy of the safeguards contingency plan (Section S8.1).

- An apparent violation was identified involving the failure to adequately secure (lock)

safeguards contingency weapons containers (Section S8.2).

l l

l DOCUMENT C NTAINS ENCLOSURE (S) CONTAIN(S) UPON SEPARATION THIS PAGE IS DECONTROLLED I

L _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ____