ML20153E759

From kanterella
Revision as of 01:44, 24 October 2020 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Notice of Violation from Insp on 880111-15.Violation Noted: Insulation Resistance Values Used for Conax & DG O'Brien Electrical Penetration Assemblies to Determine Performance Not Adequately Addressed in Environ Qualification File
ML20153E759
Person / Time
Site: Summer South Carolina Electric & Gas Company icon.png
Issue date: 05/02/1988
From: Herdt A
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
Shared Package
ML20153E752 List:
References
50-395-88-01, 50-395-88-1, NUDOCS 8805100093
Download: ML20153E759 (2)


Text

,h n;'

1 l

ENCLOSURE 1 NOTICE OF VIOLATION South Carolina Electric and Gas Company Docket No. 50-395 V. C. Summer License No. NPF-12 During the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) inspection conducted on January 11-15, 1988, violations of NRC requirements were identified. In accordance with the "General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforce- ,

ment Actions," 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C (1987), the violations are listed below:

A. 10 CFR 50.49(d)(1) and (2) requires, in part, that environmental quali-fication (EQ) file for electrical equipment include the electrical '

characteristics to ensure performance of equipment operation under conditions existing during and following a design basis accident and ,

10 CFR 50.49(J) requires that a record of such be maintained in an auditable form.

Contrary to the above, the insulation resistance (IR) values used for ,

Conax and D. G. O'Brien electrical penetration assemblies to determine performance characteristics were not adequately addressed in EQ file.

This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement I).

B. 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion XI, Test Control, states that a test program shall be established to assure that all testing required to demonstrate that structures, systems, and components will perform satisfactorily in service is identified and performed in accordance with written test procedures. ,

Contrary to the abuve, EQ maintenance requirements for the lubrication of  :

Emergency Feed Water Pump were missed for two consecutive periods. The l requirement was to lubricate the motor every twelve months as specified in EQF-M01-G03-0682. The motor was lubricated in October 1985, December 1986, and had not been lubricated as of January 15, 1988, thus exceeding the twelve month requirement for the last two periods.

This is a Severity Level V violation (Supplement I).

l l t J

8805100093 880502 PDR ADOCK 05000395 Q DCD

, ,e , *. -

South Carolina Electric and Gas Company 2 Docket No. 50-395 V. C. Summer License No. NPF-12 C. 10 CFR 50.49(f) and (k) respectively require, in part, that (1) each item of electric equipment important to safety shall be qualified by testing of, or experience with identical or similar equipment, and the qualifica-tion shall include a supporting analysis to show that the equipment to be qualified is acceptable; and (2) electric equipment important to safety which was previously qualified in accordance with "Guidelines for Evaluating Environmental Reactors" dated November 1979 (00R Guidelines) need not be requalified to 10 CFR 50.49. D0R Guidelines, Section 5.2.2, allows the use of type tests to qualify equipment important to safety if the equipment is identical in design and material construction to the test specimen.

Contrary to the above, at the time of the inspection, qualification package EQF-LUZ-G13-1282, Lubricants-Grease, did not contain the required similarity analysis necessary to qualify lubricants other than the tested Gulf products for use in EQ applications.

This is a Severity Level V violation (Supplement I).

Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, South Carolina Electric and Gas Company is hereby required to submit a written statement or explanation to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Document Control Desk, Washington, DC 20555, with a copy to the Regional Administrator, Region II, and a copy to the NRC Resident Inspector, V. C. Summer, within 30 days of the date of the letter transmitting this Notice. This reply should be clearly marked as a "Reply to a Notice of Violation" and should include [for each violation]:

(1) admission or denial of the violation, (2) the reason for the violation if admitted, (3) the corrective steps which have been taken and the results achieved, (4) the corrective steps which will be taken to avoid further '

violations, and (5) the date when full compliance will be achieved. Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending the response time. If

. an adequate reply is not received within the time specified in this Notice, an i order may be issued to show cause why the license should not be modified, suspended, or revoked or why such other action as may be proper should not be taken.

l Security or safeguards information should be submitted as an enclosure to facilitate withholding it from public disclosure as required by 10 CFR 2.790(d) or 10 CFR 73.21.

FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Alan R. H rdt, Chief Engineering Branch ,

Division of Reactor Safety I

l Dated atp Atlanta, Georgia j this te day of 1988

_ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ - _ _ _ -