ML20153G501

From kanterella
Revision as of 20:52, 23 October 2020 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Insp Rept 50-395/88-06 on 880315-18.No Violations or Deviations Noted
ML20153G501
Person / Time
Site: Summer South Carolina Electric & Gas Company icon.png
Issue date: 05/05/1988
From: Dan Collins
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To: Nauman D
SOUTH CAROLINA ELECTRIC & GAS CO.
Shared Package
ML20153G506 List:
References
NUDOCS 8805110253
Download: ML20153G501 (3)


See also: IR 05000395/1988006

Text

I)

--- - _ _ _ _ _

V O(hCWl

. MRY 0 51989

t

Docket No. 50-395

License No. NPF 12

South Carolina Electric and Gas Company

ATTN; Mr. D. A. Nauman, Vice President

Nuclear Operations (Mail Code 6ul)

P. O. Box 88

Jenkinsville, SC 29065

Gentlemen:

SUBJECT: NRC INSPECTION REPORT NO. 50-395/88-06

This refers to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) inspection conducted by

W. M. Sartor on March 15-18, 1988. The inspection included a review of

activities authorized for your V. C. Summer facility. At the conclusion of the

inspection, the findings were discussed with those members of your staff

identified in the enclosed inspection report.

Areas examined during the inspection are identified in the report. Within

these areas, the inspection consisted of selective examinations of procedures

and representative records, interviews with personnel, and observation of

activities in progress.

Within the scope of the inspection, no violations or deviations were

identified. However, there were areas identified as requiring further review

and evaluation. These items are identified as Inspector Followup Items in

Appendix A to this letter, and are also discussed in the enclosed appraisal

report.

You are requested to submit a written statement within 45 days of the date of

this letter, which details the action you plan to take, and the estimated date

of completion with regard to the findings identified in Appendix A.

In accordance with Section 2.790 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," Part 2,

Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, a copy of this letter and its enclosure

will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room.

The responses directed by this letter and its enclosure are not subject to the

clearance procedures of the Office of Management and Budget as required by the

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, Pub. L. No.96-511.

kog5 253 880505

0 OCK 05000395

_ _ _

DCD U 'l .]

/' .'g y --

\ +

! c

' South Carolina Electric and Gas Company 2

Should you have any questions concerning this letter, please contact us.

Sincerely,

Douglas M. Collins, Chief

Emergency Preparedness and

Radiological Protection Branch

Division of Radiation Safety

and Safeguards

Enclosure:

Inspection Report

cc w/ encl:

0. S. Bradham, Director, Nuclear Plant

Operations

J. L. Skoldt, General Manager,

Station Operations

J. B. Knotts , Jr.

Bishop, Cook, Purcell & Reynolds

W. A. Williams, Jr. , Special

Ae sistant, Nuclear Operations -

Santee Cooper

A. R. Koon , Jr. , Manager

Nuclear Licensing

R. E. Rainear, Executive Vice President,

South Carolina Public Service Authority

bcc w/ encl:

NRC Resident Inspector

DRS Technical Assistant

J. Hopkins, Project Managar, NRR

Document Control Desk

State of South Carolina

B. Travers, EPB/NRR

J. Heard, FEMA RIV

RII RII RI NRR WI' N

Q

WSartor

jp

Tuecker

p

H ance

4/ /gg

s y E d 1 0 // * .:

tY Tr**5

y/29/gt?

, y ups

4/2!)/88 673 /S3

g1

,

~

(

c

t

APPENDIX A

Appraisal Open Items

.

1. Review the specifications and documentation on the steam line

monitors to determine if the monitors can be made effective in providing

dose assessment data at lower than PAG limits (IFI 50-395/SS-06-01).

2. Locate all available documentation pertaining to validation,

verification, and methodology for all dose assessment models (computer

and manual) and centralize the maintenance of it into the Plant Record

System (PRS) (IFI 50-395/33-06-02).

3. Establish a periodic calculational comparison between dose assessment

models (e.g., EARS, EPP-005, State, NRC) and document the reasons for

significant dif ferences (IFI 50-395/88-06-03).