ML20138N994

From kanterella
Revision as of 04:01, 29 June 2020 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
LOCA Test of Svc Topcoated W/Phenoline 305 Finish
ML20138N994
Person / Time
Site: Comanche Peak, 05000000
Issue date: 05/09/1978
From: Boldt A, Montle J, Tellor M
CARBOLINE CO.
To:
Shared Package
ML20138M609 List: ... further results
References
FOIA-85-59 01651, 1651, NUDOCS 8511060257
Download: ML20138N994 (9)
v • d • e


Text

,

~ -

3:e w:.u;.p,

.~c . c;m :.y -~-

.-~ 4 t

' - - LABORATORY TEST REPORT

. i, g i . $1% -

( 3 Hay 9, l?78 isp6 Testing Project: #01651 FINAL REPORT CONFIDENTIAL

SUBJECT:

LOCA test of systems topcoated with Phenoline c A rion:4.

1

REFERENCE:

Cenusanche Peak Nuclear Power Station; Mr. F:). R.irw h Otitt.E ik;

. dr. Dan McBride; L-ll5-105 PURPOSE: To test the performance of Phenoline m %t b w? each d de following primers:

[ 1) Ic Amercoat D-6 @  ? s ails i 2) Ic Mobil Zinc 7 @ 2.0 - 3.0 mils l 3) le Carbo Zine 11 @ 11.0' - 12.0 mils when exposed to the Commanche Peak Steam Electric Station, FSAR LOCA

Curve and evaluated according to the criteria of ANSI N101.2 - 1972, j Section 4.5 as interpreted by Carboline.

j CCNCLUSIONS: After completion of the 7 day Commanche Peak FSAR LOCA test, the =ystems tested exhibited the following performances when

, evaluated according to ANSI N101.2 - 1972, Section 4.5 as

, interpreted by Carboline:

a. .

l . Coating System Performance

1) Amercoat D-6 @ 2-3 mils Vapor Phase Acceptable Phenoline 305 Finish
2) Amercoat D-6 @ 2-3 mils Liquid Phase Unacceptable Phenoline 305 Finish

. 3) Nobil Zinc 7 @ 2-3 mils Vapor Phase Acceptable Phenoline 305 Finish

4) Mobil Zinc 7 @ 2-3 mils Liquid Phase Acceptable Phenoline 305 Finish
5) Carbo Zine 11 @ 11-12 mils Vapor Phase Unacceptable Phenoline 305 Finish

/

6) Carbo Zine 11 @ 11-12 mils Liquid Phase Unacceptable i Phenoline 305 Finish e-*

From the Carboline Research & Development Laboratory V j

The technical dets furnished la true end oceveeve to the best of eve kne=ledse. He ...e,

n. . ,en,ee.iecc ,.cyis ,i..a .,is ,ii.a.

(car *b o1ine,)

--. m -

8511060257 851016 - - - - - - - - - - - - --- -

PDR FOIA -- - -

GARDE 85-59 PDR L

.x  ;; , p ~ ,,p . , a .,.

- LABORATORY TEST REPORT May 9, 1978/Page 2 ie

  • ?  ;,

4 CONFIDENTIAL .

PROCEDURE: A) Test coupons Size: 2" x 4" x 1/4" Certified ASTM A36 Steel.

Surface Prep: Gritblasted to SSPC-SPS-63 4 Abrasive Media: 6FH.#50 grit (Cleveland Metal Abrasives, Inc.I B) Dry Film Systems Tested Batch Numbers Thickness

, 1) Ic Amercoat D-6 6-705416 2.5 - 3.0 mils 6-705420 l ,

Ic Phenoline 305 Finish 7K2528M 4.8 - 6.2 mils _

- 7K2500M 7.3 - 8.5 mils i

2) Ic Mobil Zinc 7 FI7K24 2.1 - 2.7 mils

! Ic Phenoline 305 Finish 7K2528M 5.3 - 6.9 mils 7K2500M 8.0 - 9.0 mils l

8

3) Ic Carbo Zine 11 7K3106M 11.0 -13.0 mils

! 7K0966Z

. ~ -

Ic Phenoline 305 Finish 7K2528M 4.0 - 5.5 mils I 7K2500M 16.0 -17.0 mils

, 'v l C) Cure Schedule l

Primers (all syr.tems): 17 days at 65-76*F (18-24*C) and

, 27-90% R.H.

I Topcoat (all systems): 10 days at 72-77'T (22-26'C) and

! .31-45% R.H.

D) Exposure Texas Utilities Generating Company, Commanche Peak Steam Electric Station, FSAR Figurer 6.2.1-1 and 6.2.1-2 i

i From the Carboline Research & Development Laboratory y Th . ,.chn ic. t 4.,. fw. i h .d i. ,,.. .a d .e.w. . v. ,h. b. .. .f .., u..r.4, .. H.... . _

.. . ... . ......y i. ii . .,i. ,ii.d.

[carboiIne,)

~

w

>' ~ . :c. p .

s ,y.y ; , ~ ..; ~~. -

LABORATORY TEST REPORT May 9, 1978/Page 3

-jh. .:,,

'J'/ CONFIDENTIAL

l. Time / Temperature / Pressure Profile Time Temperature Pressure Sprav Condition Inftial to 10 seconds 240*F (115'C) 44 psis Static 10 seconds to 15 mins. 270*F (132*C) 58 psig Dynamic 15 mins. to 1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br />

-15 mins. 215'F (102*C) 34 psig Dynamic 1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> 15 mins. to 7 days 215-130*F 34-10 psig Dynamie

! (102-51'C) .

Please refer to the recorder chart (L115-105) for exact conditions of LOCA profile.

2. Spray Solution H.,B0 2000 ppa as Baron) in deionized water.

pH =3 8. (5 - 10.0 (NaOH added to adjust pH)

GRADING PROCEDURE:

The test coupons were evaluated for performance in the following areas:

)

1) Material flaking off
2) Delamination between coats and/or peeling
3) Blistering of the topcoat l 4) Chalking of the coating
5) Excessive cracking l

l Grading procedures specified in Report N101.2 - 1972 of the American National Standards Institute-Protective Coatings for Light Water Nuclear Reactor Containment Facilities:

4.5 Methods of Examining and Evaluating the Exposed Test Specimens The dynamic and/or static elevated temperature-pressure and irradiation test panels shall be evaluated within 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> and again after 2 weeks after removal from the test chamber for the following surface defects: flaking, delanination and/or peeling, blistering, and chalking. Defects listed in Subsections 4.5.1 through 4.5.4 shall be dealt with as follows:

8 J

. .2 5' From the Carboline Research & Development Laboratory j V

~

,. ,h.6..,.#. ,ko.. .s,..H....

Th....hai..:a... r i.h.ai. ,,....d.......

pbdMq) i

.. , ,.n .. .e......y i. ei. .,i ,ii.d.

~

l

~

.v. .,

w.. ,3 .

LABORATORY TEST REPORT May 9, 1975/Page 4 EM g3} 4.5.1 Flaking. ASTM D772, Evaluating Degree of Resistance to Flaking (Scaling) of Exterior Paints, Part 21, American Society for Testing and

  • Materials, Philadelphia, Pa. 19103. Flaking shall not be permitted.

4.5.2 Delanination and/or Peeling. Delamination and/or peeling shall not be permitted.

4,5.3 Blistering. Blistering shall be limited to a few, intact blisters, Size No. 4, ASTM D714, Standard Method of Evaluating Degree of Blistering

! of Paints, Part 21, American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, i

- Pa . 19103. The number and the size of blisters shall be recorded.

4.5.4 Chalking. ASTM D659, Standard Method of Evaluating Degree of

, Resistance to Chalking of Exterior Paints, Part 21, American Society for

. Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, Pa. 19103. Heavy chalking shall not be permitted.

Any other changes in coating properties which are not also associated with the separation, or the release, of coating from the substrate shall not be a cause for rejection.

t ANSI N101.2 - 1972 Criteria (As interpreted by Carboline)

Maximum Degree of Failure Allowable

n. .

Flaking ASTM D772 10 (None)

Delam h tien or Peeling None

  • Blistering ASTM D714-56 Blister Size Blister Density
#2 None i
  • NOTE: A blister is not d4 Few I intact when it has resulted #6 Medium l in coating being separated #8 Medium-Dense from the test coupon.

Chalking AS'Di D659 3 (Light)

NOTE: Flaking, blistering and chalking are all evaluated according to AS'Di Standards, with a rating of 10 indicating that no failure was observed in the specific grading area.

I I

, _ = .

EE:S 7 From the Carboline Research & Development Laboratory

, Vk

Th . ...h. i.. i 4. .. r,n 4.h .a i . ,,.. .a a . . ..... ,. + . b . . . e .- ka .. i.4 s .. H .w v.,,
n. . .... .e......y i. i i . .,i.pir.4.

-~

ebdMM

, 9, 1978/P'eg

[

i CONFID - .

Panel Identification Dry Film Delanina- Other -

and Thickness tion or Blister- Performance Performance Coating System (Mils) Flaking Peeling ina Chalking Characteristica Evaluation IA)* Blistering at Ic Ameron D-6 2.5/3.0 10 None None 10 bottom edge, Acceptable Ic Phenoline 305 4.8/5.0 both sides, Finish 7.3/8.0 larger than

  1. 2F-BT-intact l1 1

+

IB Blistering at .,

Ic Ameron D-6 2.3/2.4 10 None #2F-BT on 10 bottom edge, Unacceptao,e Ic Phenoline 305 6.2/5.4 side 1 - both sides,

.

  • Finish 8.5/7.8 intact larger than J
  1. 2F-BT-cracked 2A)* Blistering at None bottom edge, Acceptable I  : '7 Ic Hobil Zinc 7 2.7/2.6 10 None 10 Ic Phenoline 305 5.3/5.4 both sides,  !

Finish 8.0/8.0 larger than 1 #2F-BT-intact

28) Blistering at g Ic Hobil Zinc 7 2.4/2.1 10 None None 10 bottom edge, Acceptable Ic Phenoline 305 6.6/6.9 both sides: ~

Finish 9.0/9.0 -f2H-BT.One #2 ..

at top edge, 4 Side 1.

Acceptable Performance . ,

ANSI N101.2-1972, Section 4.5, 10 None #4F to #8 Light

  • Panel suspended in the .

4 i As Interpreted by Carboline #8HD < spor phase l LAB /T-127)

I e

t i'

i.

! l

~. ,

i .

('N CONFIDEh _ _...L

)

j,. 9, 19,78/ Pas Panel Identification Dry Film Delanina- Other .'

and Thickness tion or Blister- . Performance Performance #

Coating System (Hils) Flaking Peeling ina Chalking Characteristics Evaluation 3A)* Larger than .

Blistering at ,

Ic carbo Zinc 11 11.0/11.5 .10 None #2F-BT, Side 10 bottom edge: Unacceptable Ic Phenoline 305 5.0/ 5.5 1; #6F, 4F- One larger Finish

  • 16.0/17.0 BT, Side 2 than #2-BT-

! Intact. One larger than

. #2-B at top edge, Side 2, '

intact.

4 ,

38) Larger than Three hairline Ic Carbo Zinc 11 13.0/12.2 10 See #2F-BT, near 10 cracks 1/4-1/2" Unacceptable .;

Ic Phenoline 305 4.0/ 4.8 Blistering edges', Side 2 on upper edges- .i Finish 17.0/17.0 (peeled) coating intact. ,

(1) Because blistering is limited to few-moderate, intact blisters occuring at the edges only, panels IA, 2A and 2B are rated " Acceptable". ,

Acceptable Performance 10 None #4F to #8MD #8 Light

  • Panel suspended in the [ '

, ANSI N101.2-1972, Section 4.5, vapor phase As Interpreted by Carboline .

LAB, 1271 j s W

. ir l

4

, ;r.

4 i

1

n _.

- .,: .  :- .; -e j , . .

i LABORATORY TEST REPORT 7 May 9, 1978/Page 7 3

iE.

CONFIDENTIAL DISCUSSION OF RESULTS: Although panels lA, 2A and 23 do not meet the strict standards of l

ANSI N101.2, Section 4.5, Carboline interprets the standard as

pertaining primarily to the plane areas of a test coupon, and

{* places limited significance on the discontinuous surfaces such as edges, channels, web spatter, etc. Therefore, the performance l of these panels (lA, 2A, 23) having intact edge blisters, with j no other effects to the coating system or substrate, is rated 4 " Acceptable".

gg; p ' W -Q r i^

Alicia M. Boldt Michael D. Tellor J F. Montle

Acting Group Leader Supervisor Vice President j Testing Department Research & Development Research & Development i
/bj i

C: CJW / DWM / PDL / MDT l

+

i

.)

d 4

E-=

  • f~ From the Carboline Research & Development Laboratory y Th . ,..hn i.. I d... f. ni s h .d i s erv. .n d . ..we... ,. th. b. ., .i .., kn.. .a s .. H.....,,
a. s r.a,.. .f .. cur =.y is si .a er i-eli.d*

(car = b olirle,)

l - - . -

ewes. gm ew.w.y e 3 e , ,q eg ,,,

. ~.

I '

! O ,

. ,q 4

o 9

, 3 "

1 O

, & DEPs4,ONE 100 */o $ PRAY, MAV ST , PRolH o -_.

p ;8 O

g.? 9 -

v a .

O en o i ne o _

o G. .

7

  • o . .

o

t t ,q- _

r ~ .

ib

- s 3

o -

e o  ;

o o

S r  !

I il 18111! I I I IIllll I ' IIIII'l I ' I III'l t l 1l i'1li t 1l f tii'

I i 11till!

i g ,o.. io. io- soi io$ toi lo' lo' l

i COMANCilE PEAK S E.S.

hE0' II FNAL SAFETY ANALYSIS HEPORT UNITS l and 2 1 -

cot lTAINitEllT VAPOlt ,

l

  • TCHPCnATURC TRANSIEHT - , J,

.DEESG . . . = .

I FGitE 6.2.1-2 . _ _ . _

i

r , .

~

r _

'. .T

.R O

f- ,

S. PO E

SE. R K G2Sd E

R U

AY na O.

S G S S P E P 1

' EMJ E

HYT S

R P

T E

D 1

2 N

. CTI E T 6 N FEN U MN H E AA I I E

R MS A S T N U G

OL I I A I CA O R C T F

N F

, 6

  • 1 1

0 1

_ 1 l

_ 5 l

, . l X H AT M. R O

%1l i

1 5

O TF A i l

i

- l R l i

P i S l I

/*o l l

1 0

O l l

i O 0 l i

1 l

E I_

N 8 O 0 1

1 1

)

G 1

1 1

c:

E S

(s l

P 1 G 2 D  !

1 1

0 E 1

1 1

1 M*

I 1

1 T i

l l

l '0 1

l

- l i

.

  • l l

._ j 1

1 O

I

- 1 1

1 a.

1 1

l 8 o h g O8 5 3g o8m8j oOOv 58' 0

1 o O99.

O h+6

u. % pi6v & a.

1 \ i

~~ ~ ,- - m m ._. ~. , : .

,4 a .g

, in s. +.

. LABORATORY TEST REPORT

[ September 12, 1975 )

TESTING PROJECT: 01377 Interim Reoort: 96 Hours

SUBJECT:

Loss of Coolant Accident testing of Carbo Zinc 11 at various thicknesses, untopcoated and topcoated with Phenoline 305.

REFERENCE:

Carboline Master BWR Curve; Mr. Chris Kjaer-olsen, Mr. Jim Neese, Mr. W. R. Shelton, General Electric; Mr. C. J. Wiegers, Carboline.

PURPOSE: Evaluate Carbo Zine 11 at film thicknesses of 1.4 through 15 mils, both untopcoated and topcoated with 1 mil of Phenoline '

305 Finish, when subjected to the Carboline Master BWR/1975 >

, test exposure.

1

! OBSERVATIONS: After the initial four days exposure, all systems are exhibiting i an acceptable to excellent performance per the ANSI N101.2-1972,

! Section 4.5 evaluation criteria.

PROCEDURE: A. Test Coupons 2" x 5" x 1/4" Sandblasted Steel i

B. Systems Tested Drv Film Thickness *

1. Carbo Zine 11 1 n:11
2. Carbo Zinc 11 3 mils
3. Carbo Zine 11 5 mils i 4 Carbo Zine 11 -

myls

5. Carbo Zine 11 9 mils
6. Carbo Zinc 11 11 mils
7. Carbo Zinc 11 15 mils 1
8. Carbo Zine 11 1 mil Phenoline 305 1 mil
9. Carbo Zine 11 3 mils Phenoline 305 1 mils
10. Carbo Zine 11 5 mils Phenoline 305 1 mil
11. Carbo Zinc 11 7 mils

! Phenoline 305 1 mil From the Carboline Research C Development Laboratory Th . ..c ha .c.:

a. ,a ..... .e4.....,.

. . e.,. . . n .4 . . ,, . . .e 4 . . . ., . . . e. ** . . . . i . . , b a . . . 4 3 . . m . . . . . .

,.. p. .,. .i....

[C L_ .is r* O O 3 Iilem ,

,fg7,yy 3 . . . ~ . . . -

0 I I U WU l' J U'

-1 .

, ;p e.w : _

p. , . , , w, _

_ . , m,,

y ._, ;

- l

}

~ ' '

LABORATORY TEST REPORT

.'- [ September 12, 1975/Page 2 3 C:

TESTING PROJECT: 01377 Interin Report: 96 Hours PROCEDURE: (Continued)

Systems Tested Dry Film Thickness

  • 5.

i

12. Carbo Zine 11 9 mils Phenoline 305 1 mil
13. Carbo Zine 11 11 mils Phenoline 305 1 mil 14 Carbo Zinc 11 13 mils

! Phenoline 305 1 mil

', *All dry film thicknesses are given as reported by the Application Department. For measured dry film thicknesses,

' please refer to "Results".

i C. Cure Schedule 1

Carbo Zine 11 (no topcoat), 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> at 100% Humidity plus 3 days at 75*F.

I a Carbo Zine 11, 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> at high humidity, Phenoline 305 Finish, 3 days at 75'T plus 1 day at 120*F.

D. Exposure Carboline Master LOCA Curve, BWR Testing 1/75

1. Water Chemistrv f

Deionized Water i 2. Time-Temperature-Pressure Profile

{ This test was begun at atmospheric pressure and kept i

at saturation pressure throughout the complete cycle.

Total Time Lapse Temperature

  • Test Environment

' 0-10 seconds (Steam Blast) 332*F Static j 10 seconds-7 minutes 250*F Static i 7 minutes-4 hours 200*F Static 4 4 hour4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br />s-96 hours ** 180*F Static

~ ~ ~4 diys-100 days 160*F Static I

' C i l From the Carboline Research & Development Laboratory

~

N )

T h . . . ha .. . t .. . . so. . .h a . .. 4 . c e . .. . ,* . b . . . i .., 6 a . i .. . . . M . . .. ...

a. .....a .. .e ....,.<,.. p. .,.,,,,....

c ar*boIirie m .

. _v-rum +- - - m -.

  • v

f: ; - - 7 ., p - *

-c'  ;:

- ~ -%f L -

7, i

i

~ '

LABORATORY TEST REPORT i

( September 12, 1975/Page 3 3

.s:

TESTING PROJECT: 01377 '

Interim Report: 96 Hours 4

PROCEDURE: (Continued)

  • These temperatures are the minimum temperature required by the curve; at times the actual temperature may have exceeded this temperature level.
    • At this time all test coupons were evaluated for development P of this interim report. They were then returned to the chamber j for completion of the entire 100 day cycle. .-

COATING APPLICATION: Substrate: Carbon Steel coupons sandblasted to a White Metal i Finish (SSPC SP-5-63) .

4 Blast Abrasive: 2 parts 5330 Steel Shot, 1 part C40 Steel Crit.

Carbo Zine 11 l

i Batch Number: 4L5707

Color
Creen ,

j .

l Temperature: 85*F Humidity: 55%

Phenoline 305 Finish l Batch Number: SE2283M Catalyst Batch Number: SD2433 Color: White 1 Temperature: 85'F Humidity: 401 GRADING PROCEDURE: The test coupons were evaluated for performance in the following

, areas:

l l 1. Material flaking off

! 2. Delamination between coats and/or peeling

3. Blistering of the topcoat
4. Chalking of the coating
5. Excessive cracking ,

t f

i l-t From the Carboline Research & Development Laboratory Q )

i Th e teckn.cel deve fwe n,shed ,e ##we sad etc.

, . . ... ., . ,s.... 'ete eo m e b a s s of e., a g o w leoge. 84 o me.

a. i.e,ea ee .e e ,

p ag

~-e<=- e -w e n- , ,_,_., , ,,

p -- - . - - , . y ne,--,e. -,. - - - , - -,-r ga- y-

,a.-

cs e .

+

4 . .- m -p yy ;

LABORATORY TEST REPORT

, [ September 12, 1975/Page 4 D TESTING PRL.'E.CT: 01377 Interim Report: 96 Hours CRADING PROCEDURE: (Continued)

Crading procedures specified in Report N101.2-1972 of the American National Standards Institute-Protective Coatings for Light Water Nuclear Reactor Contain-ment Facilities:

i

. 4.5 Methods of Examining and Evaluating the Exposed Test Specimens i The dynamic and/or static elevated temperature-pressure and irradiation test panels shall be evaluated within 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> and again after 2 weeks after

removal from the test chamber for the following surface defects
flaking, delam-a ination and/or peeling, blistering, and chalking. Defects listed in Subsections 4.5.1 through 4.5.4 shall be dealt with as follows:

, 4.5.1 Flaking. ASTM D772. Evaluating Degree of Resistance to Flaking (Scaling) of Exterior Paints, Part 21, American Society for Testing and j Materials, Philadelphia, Pa. 19103. Flaking shall not be permitted.

3 4.5.2 Delamination and/or Peeling. Delamination and/cr peeling shall l not be permitted.

4.5.3 Blistering. Blistering shall be limited to a few, intact blisters, Size No. 4, ASTM D714, Standard Method of Evaluating Degree of Blistering of' Paints, Part 21, American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, Pa. 19103. The number and the size of blisters shall be recorded. ,

4.5.4 chalking. ASTM D659, Standard Method of Evaluating Degree of Resistance to Chalking of Exterior Paints, Part 21, American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, Pa. 19103. Heavy chalking

{ shall not be permitted.

Any other changes in coating properties which are not also associated with the separation, or the release, of coating from the substrate shall not be a cause for rejection.

i i

,/

From the Carboline Research & Development Laboratory T h . ..

n. . . . ...

h a . . . i 4. . . #, a . .w .4 . . ,. . . . 4 . . .......m.,,.#.,....i.....so....r.

.#... ...,.. .... .,. .i....

[ c :s r*o o1Iries, u_ _ _ _ 2 .

. e

_ ,p..;~>

i.

~

LABORATORY TEST REPORT September 12, 1975/Page 5 4

TESTING PROJECT: 01377 Interim Report: 96 Rours CRADING PROCEDURE: (Continued)

(December,1973)

ANSI N101.7-1972 Criteria (As interpreted by Carboline',

Maximum Degree of Failure Allowable

?

l l Flaking ASTM D772 10 (None)

Delanination or Peeling None j

  • Blistering ASTM D714-56 Blister Size Blister Density i #2 None
  • NOTE: A blister is not #4 Few l intact when it has resulted #6 Medium i

in coating being separated #8 Medium-Dense i from the test coupon.

Chalking ASTM D659 8 (Iight)

NOTE: Flaking, blistering and chalking are all evaluated according to ASTM Standards, with a rating of 10 indicating that no failure was observed in the specific grading area.

f I

l I

i i

i i, _ _ _ _

. ,t .

I s From the Carboline Research & Development Laboratory T k . . .. * , .e . i .

................#.,a.in....,,.4........6....e..,6...i.4,..no......

t

.... ... .. ... .....i....

g ,.g.,,,3 ,

. _ , . . - -- -+- - - '

September 12, 1975/Page 6 TESTING FROJECT: 01377 "

Interim Report: 96 Hours REStil.TS:

Heasured Other Coating System Dry Film Delanination Performance Performance l and I.D. Thickness Flaking or Peeling Blistering Chalking Characteristics Evaluation

14. .;

Carbo Zinc 11 (1) 1.5 mils 10 None 10 10 Slight salt Excellent

. deposits 15.

Carbo Zinc 11 (2) 1.4 mils 10 None 10 10 Slight salt Excellent deposits 2A.

Carbo Zinc 11 (1) 2.8 mils 10 None 10 10 Slight salt Very Cood , ,,

deposits; Cracking ^l st vapor-liquid IIj interface (intact) ,

2B.

Carbo Zinc 11 (2) 2.7 mils 10 None 10 10 Very slight salt Excellent ,

deposits ;d #

.;y 3A.

Carbo Zine 11 (1) 5.0 mils 10 None 10 10 Slight salt Excellent ., i deposits ,-;..

3F. - - '

Carbo Zinc 11 (2) 5.0 mils 10 None 10 10 Very slight salt Excellent ,

deposits '?!

Perfect Performance 10 None #4F to #8MD #8 (Light)

(1) Panels suspended in chamber

, (2) Panels set on bottom of chamber e

l 4

- ~._u_. ___ . . _ . . . _ . . . . . _ . . . -

L l /'~' Ssptembsr 12, 1975/P:g2 7 TESTINk ECT: 01377 'i Interim % port: 96 Nours l RESULTS: (Continued)

Heasured Other Coating System i Dry Film Delamination Performance Performance and I.D. Thickness Flaking or Peeling Blistering Chalking Characteristics Evaluation -

4A.

Carbo Zinc 11 (1) 6.5 alls 10 None 10 10 Slight salt very Good deposits; Slight cracking at interface (intact) 4B. s Carbo Zinc 11 (2) 7.0 mils 10 None 10 10 Very slight salt Excellent deposits g.

i 6

$A.

Carbo Zine 11 (1) 9.0 mils 10 None 10 10 Moderate " Mud- Very Good cracking" (intact);

Slight salt deposits I

5B.

Carbo Zinc 11 (2) 9.0 mils 10 None 10 10 Hoderate "Hud- Jery Cood I/

cracking" (intact); [

Slight salt .;

deposits 6A. .

i Carbo Zine 11 (1) 12.5 mils 10 None 10 10 Moderate " Mud- Very Good .

- cracking" (intact);

l Slight salt j

deposits ,

6B.

Carbo Zinc 11 (2) 13.5 mils 10 None 10 10 Slight surface Very Cood i cracking (intact); O Slight salt deposits

Perfect Performance 10 None #4F to #8MD #8 (Light)

(1) Panels suspended in chamber (2) Panels set on bottom of chamber

-- . - - 6

-s .~ j

) Szptember 12, 1975/P:g3 8 .e ,

TESTING ECT: 01377 -

Interim Report: 96 Hours ,

RESULTS: (Continued)

Heasured Other Coating System Dry Film Delamination Performance Performance and I.D. Thickness Flaking or Peelina Blistering Chalking Characteristics Evaluation 7A.

Carbo Zine 11 (1) 15.0 mils 10 None 10 10 Slight salt Excellent deposits

78. -

Carbo Zinc 11 (2) 15.0 mils 10 Hone 10 10 Slight " Mud- Excellent cracking" (intact);

Slight salt .

deposits 8A.

l Carbo Zinc 11 (1) 2.2 mils 10 None Smaller than 10 Slight coating Excellent h Phenoline 305 #8F-B at discoloration

bottom edge, ,

(3) one side 8B.

Carbo Zinc 11 (2) 2.1 mils 10 None 10 10 Slight coating Excellent '

Phenoline 305 discoloration t 9A.

Cart.o Zinc 11 (1) 4.0 mils 10 None 10 10 Chipping on Excellent , ,

Phenoline 305 corners and 1 edge l,

, . due to mechanical .

damage (4) 9B. ,

l Carbo Zinc 11 (2) 3.6 mils 10 None 10 10 Slight coating Excellent ,.

I Phenoline 305 discoloration (4) EP i

Perfect Performance 10 None #4F to #8HD #8 (Light)

~i (1) Panels suspended in chamber (2) Panels set on bottom of chamber

+ (3) Due to edge effect ,

(4) Pin-holes in topcoat from application l'

i

. - - _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ - - - - - _ - - _ _ . - - - - . ._. .- __ - - ~ - . _. - - - - - -.

. _ , _ . . _ _ ~ . _ _ _. _ . . _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . . . . , . . . . .

f

' ~ *

' 's S:ptraber 12, 1975/ Peg 2 9  !;

) 1 TESTING sOJECT: 01377 -

Interim Report: 96 Hours -

RESULTS: (Continued)

Hessured Other coating System . Dry Film Delamination Performance Performance and T.D. . Thickness Flaking or Peeling Blistering Chalking Characteristics Evaluation 10A.

Carbo Zinc 11 (1) 6.7 mils 10 None 10 10 Slight coating Excellent Phenoline 305 discoloration (3) .

108. '

Carbo Zinc 11 (2) 5.6 mils 10 None #8F-B at 1 10 Slight coating Excellent '

Phenoline 305 edge and discoloration (3) '*

corner, one side (4) ',*

11A.

Carbo Zinc 11 (1) 8.0 mils 10 None 10 10 Slight coating Excellent /

Phenoline 305 discoloration (3)

118. '

Carbo Zinc 11 (2) 7.8 mils 10 None 10 10 Slight coating Excellent  ?'

Phenoline 305 discoloration (3) 12A.

, Carbo Zine 11 (1) 9.5 mils 10 None 10 10 Rough topcoat Excellent Phenoline 305 surface and

'i coating discoloration 128.

} Carbo Zinc 11 (2) 10.2 mila 10 None 10 10 Slight "Hud- Excellent Phenoline 305 cracking" and ,

coating discoloration (3)

Perfect Performance 10 None #4F to #8MD #8 (Light) -

(1) Panels suspanded in chatber

. (2) Panels set on bottom of chamber (3) Pin-holes in topcoat from application (4) Due to edge effect -

. i

. . _ _ . _ _ . _ . _ _ _ _ _ . ~ . , _ _ _. _ . _ _ . _ . _ _ _ _ . ._m. .

.s. . . .. . _ . . _ . . , , . - u,_.

September 12, 1975/Page 10 ,-

a TESTING radJECT: 01377 -

Interim Report: 96 Hours -

4 RESULTS: (Continued) '

l Measured Other

~,

Coating System Dry Film Delamination Performance Performance and I.D. Thickness Flakina or Peeling Blisterina Chalkins Characteristics Evaluation 13A.

Carbo Zinc 11 (1) 11.5 mils 10 None 10 10 Slight wrinkling Excellent ,

Phenoline 305 and coating -

discoloration (3) 13B. -

Carbo Zinc 11 (2) 12.0 mils 10 None 10 10 Coating Excellent Phenoline 305 discoloration (3) (4) 14A. 'A Carbo Zinc 11 (1) 15 mils ^~

10 None 10 10 Slight coating Excellent -

Phenoline 305 discoloration (3) .

4 14B.

Carbo Zine 11 (2) 15 mils 10 None 10 10 Slight coating ~ Excellent 'c' Phenoline 305 discoloration Slight "Hud-crackins" (3) (4) '

Perfect Performance 10 None #4F to #BHD #8 (Light) '5 ~

(T) Panels suspended in chamber - - '

(2) Panels set on bottom of chamber (3) Topcoat is mirroring the heavy CZ11 prime coat (4) Pin-holes in topcoat from application r

4

' r.

-i~

l >

- . . .- . - - . . ~ . _ . _ . - . . - .

iJ

'. a. LABORATORY TEST REPORT

,. [ September 12, 1975/Page 11 )

< t.

TESTING PROJECT: 01377 Interim Report: 96 Hours I

DISCUSSION OF RESULTS: All panels were evaluated after 96 hours0.00111 days <br />0.0267 hours <br />1.587302e-4 weeks <br />3.6528e-5 months <br /> for development of this interia report. The panels have been returned to test and will be re-graded after 100 days.

ff $'dN o' ~

J n F. Moncle Patrick D. Fisher i

l ViS President Developmental Engineer l Research & Development Testing Department i PDF:ph 7750/8391/252/3083/8852/8675/5689/

5377/6665/9517/5470/5471/7197/7196 OR: Testing Department IC: SLL/EDT/JFM/EWS/JDB/CHD/SLS/DRL/JRL/RJT/CJW/ LAB CROUP LEADERS 1

i 3

, O

'. From the Carboline Research & Developmient Laboratory a............e.,.......,,..,,,......,.....,.#..,.....i..n.......

i n . . .. . . . . i

......., .. ..... .,. .i....

,pg ,}

. . . .a .

. . , w,,m m =. _ e- ~ ~- *

, , - - - , , . , - , , - ,------,---,----,-r-._- - _ _ ,

. , n. s.

  1. \ LABORATORY TEST REPORT '

< [

TESTING PROJECT: 01377 I FINAL REPORT - 100 DAYS December 23, 1975

SUBJECT:

LOCA testing of Carbo Zinc 11 at various thicknesses alone and topcoated with Phenoline 305.

REFERENCE:

Mr. Chris Kjaar - Olsen, General Electric; Mr. Charles J. Wiegers, Carbo 11ne Master BWR Curve.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the performance of Carbo Zine 11 at film thicknesses from 1 to 15 mils, both untopcoated and topcoated with Phenoline 305, when exposed to the Carbo 11ne Master BWR Curve.

CCNCLUSIONS: After the 100 days of the Carboline Master BWR Curve, the following conclusions have been reached:

1) Carbo Zinc 11 is acceptable according to ANSI N101.2-1972 Section 4.5 as interpreted by Carboline at dry film thick-

. , nesses up to 12.5 mils.

l

2) The ic Carbo Zinc /lc Phenoline 305 is acceptable according to ANSI N101.2-1972 Section 4.5 as interpreted by Carboline at dry film thicknesses up to 11.5 mils.

i

~

3) At dry film thicknesses in excess of those mentioned above, Carbo Zinc 11 and Carbo Zinc /Phenoline 305 are not accept-j i b c3 able. (Please refer to "Results")

PROCEDURI: A) Test Coupons i

2" x 5" x 1/8" sandblasted steel panels (blast profile of 1 to 2 mils) i B) Systems Tested Drv Film Thickness l

1) Carbo Zinc 11 (various thicknesses) Please Refer i

! 2) Carbo Zine 11 (various thicknesses) to "Results" i Phenoline 305 C) Cure Schedule carbo Zine 11: 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> at 100% humidity, between coats; 3 days at 75'F, final cure (untopcoated Carbo Zine 11 only).

f Phenoline 305: 3 days at 75'F, 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> at 120*F, j final cure.

i From the Carboline Research & Development Laboratory

?

in . ...ha i e.1 4. .. to,a . .h .4 s . u . .a 4 .. . .. . ch . 6. . . . f .., b .. .4, .. H . . . . .,.

a . .. .. . .. .# . . . ., . e, . . . . . .n . , i ai, n .d .

(Car $300lne .

  • -ame' .meman s*, s' tme en euw j

l i, A M e n -__

hh[k I

O w - -

~ ... ., . . . _. w- .

4 LABORATORY TEST REPORT TESTING PROJECT: 01377 December 23, 1975 q FINAL REPORT - 100 DAYS Page 2 PROCEDURE: (Continued)

D) Exposure Carboline Master BWR Curve

] (Raference: UNWCC Draft #1; G.E. Mark III, Dry Well) 1

1) Water Chemiserv ,

Deionized Water

2) Time-Temperature-Pressure Curve i Time Temperature Pressure *

! l l Initial Ambient Ambient j Initial - 10 Seconds 332*F 106 psig 10 Seconds - 7 Minutes 250*F 30 psig 7 Minutes - 4 Hours 200*F 11.5 psig 4 Hours - 96 Ecurs** 180*F (Hot Soak) 7.5 psig 96 Hours - 100 Days 160*F (Hot Soak) 4.7 psig

*5ystem was held at saturation pressure throughout the test cycle; the maxinum temperature and pressure experienced by the panels was 332'T and 106 psig.

~

    • The panels were removed from test at this time for grading and development of an interim report. They were then returned for the completion of the 100 day test cycle.

! GRADING PROCEOURE: The test coupons were evaluated for performance in the following areas:

1) Material flaking off
2) Delamination between coats and/or peeling
3) Blistering of the topcoat
4) Chalking of the coating
5) Excessive cracking Grading procedures specified in Report N101.2-1972 of the American National Stand-ards Institute-Protective Coatings for Light Water Nuclear Reactor Containment Facilities:

4.5 Methods of Examining and Evaluating the Exposed Test Specimens Ihe dynamic and/or static elevated temperature-pressure and irradiation test panels shall be evaluated within 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> and again after 2 weeks after removal from the test chamber for the following surface defects: flaking, delsmination, and/or peeling, blistering, and chalking. Defects listed in Subsections 4.5.1 through l 4.5.4 shall be dealt with as follows:

i From the Carboline Research & Developrnent Laboratory Tw . ... i . . i 4. .. r , . .h .4 6 . ,,.. 4 . . . .. . = m . 6. .. . e .., 6 a .. .4, .. H . ... .

a..,......e....,..,......,..i.4.

[ car *tze1ine, .

t ausmama.amaman ,euma ese ease i i 1

.=a. ..mee__. . ewe = -- --

e. se emoe eme + * . w.. . . .,

, _ - , , ._ _. ,. _ . - , _ . . - _ . , - . + . , . _ - , , - . ,

- - ._._~ - ._ _ .- - -.. - _ _ _ - -. _-.. . ----. _ - - -

e. .

~

.ns -

-m..- - . . .

s LABORATORY TEST REPORT

_ TESTING PROJECT: 01377 December 23, 1975 FINAL REPORT - 100 DAYS Page 3 GRADING PROCEDURE: (Continued) 4.5.1 Flaking. ASti D772, Evaluating Degree of Rasistance to Flaking j (Sc.M9g) of Exterior Paints, Part 21, American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, Pa. 19103. Flaking shall not be permitted.

i 4.5.2 Delaminatien and/or Peeling. Delanination and/or peeling shall

! not be permitted.

4.5.3 Blistering. Blistering shall be limited to a few, intact blisters, ,

i Size No. 4. ASDi D714, Standard Method of Evaluating Degree of Blistering i j of Paints, Part 21. American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia,

!  ; Pa. 19103. The number and the size of blisters shall be recorded. i l 4.5.4 Chalking. ASri D659, Standard Method of Evaluating Degree of Resistance to Chalking of Exterior Paints, Part 21, American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, Pa. 19103. Heavy chalking shall not be permitted.

Any other changes in coating properties which are not also associated with the separacica, or the release, of coating from the substrate shall not be a cause for rejection.

(Dece=ber, 1973)

ANSI N101.2-1972 Criteria (As interpreted by Carboline)

Maximum Degree of Failure Allowable

Flaking ASri D772 10 (None)

( Delamhacion or Peeling None

,

  • Blistering ASti D714-56 Blister Size Blister Density -
  1. 2 None t
  • NOTE: A blister is not #4 Few
intact when it has resulted #6 Medium t in coating being separated #8 Medium-Dense from the test coupon.

Chalking AS21 D659 8 (Light) i NOTE: Flaking, blistering and chalking are all e' valuated according to ASTM Standards, with a rating of 10 indicating that no failure was observed I

in the specific grading area.

l i From the Carboline Research & Development Laboratory

! T h . ...ha . . . i 4. . so, . .h .4 6. ,,.. . 4 .. . b . . . e .. , 6 . . i .. . . . M . . . . ..,

a . . ..a , .. . e e u ... .y . . . . . . , i . . i . . ... . .

(carlao1ine I .

i unaasma, emma'== e'. ,eeste ne eene s

_m-- - -n -

y- --

. - _ - - . _ _ . - _._.t l .._-..

j l TESTING PROJECT: 01377 - December 23, 1975 -

FINAL REPORT - 100 DAYS Page 4 ,

t

.i Dry Film Thickness Delcaipa- ,

Other ,

(Actual tion or Blister- Performance Performance i Coating System Thickness) Flaking Peeling ing Chalking Characteristics Evaluation -

1A)

Carbo Zinc 11 1 mil 10 None 10 10 Moderate salt Very good ,*

l (1.5 mils) deposits IB)

Carbo Zinc 11 1 mil 10 None 10 10 Hoderate salt Very good 'I (1.4 mils) deposits -

2A)

Carbo Zinc 11 3 mils 10 Hone 10 10 Moderate salt Very good (2.8 mils) deposits 2B)

Carbo Zinc 11 3 mils 10 None 10 10 Moderate salt Very good ,

(2.7 mils) deposits

! 3A)

Carbo Zinc 11 5 mils 10 None 10 10 Hoderate salt Very good - I (5.0 mils) deposits 3B)

Carbo Zinc 11 5 mils 10 None 10 10 Moderate salt Very good I (5.0 mils) deposits ,

4A)

Carbo Zinc 11 7 mils 10 None 10 10 Salt deposits Very good (6.5 mile) 48)

Carbo Zinc 11 7 mils 10 None 10 10 Salt deposits Very good (7.0 mils)  ;

5A)

Carbo Zinc 11 9 mils 10 None 10 10 Slight salt de- Good I (9.0 mils) posits; slight "mudcracking" s

of surface I

Perfect Performance 10 None #4F to #8  ! l per ANSI N101.2-1975 #8HD (Light)  ! l l i 4

i i I

i t

I

i O .

TESTING PROJECT: 01377 ->

December 23, 1975 FINAL REPORT - 100 DAYS Page 6 [ [..

' Dry Film Thickness Delanina- Other (Actual tion or Blister- '

Performance Performance ,.

t Coating System Thickness) Flaking Peeling ing Chalking Characteristics Evaluation 8A) '

4 Carbo Zinc /11 1 mil 10 None #8F-B near 10 Slight coating Very good '

Phenoline 305 1 mil edges both .discoloratioa <

(2.2 mils) sides

88) .

Carbo Zinc 1.1 1 mil 10 None #8H-B at 10 Slight coating Ccod  ?

Phenotine 305 1 mil one cor- discoloration (2.1 mils) ner, one side 9A) '

Carbo Zinc 11 3 mils ., 10 Noiie s. 10 10 Very slight Excellent Phenoline 305 1 mil

' ~

coating dis-(4.0 mils) coloration

98) -

l Carbo Zinc 11 3 mils 10 Nor.e 10 9 (Very Very slight Very Good l-Phenolir.e 305 1 mil Light) coating dis-(3.6 mils) coloration 10A)

Carbo Zinc 11 5 mils 10 None 10 10 Very slight Excellent Phenoline 305 1 mil coating dis-(6.7 mils) coloration ,

108)

Carbo r.au. *1 5 mils 10 None 10 10 Very slight "

Excellent

--Phenoline 305 1 mil coating dis- I

~

(5.6 mile) coloration Perfect Performance 10 None #4F to #8 j per ANSI N101.2-1975 #8HD (Light) l I

t I t

T

.__ _ _ _ . _ - _ . - .m._ ,e TESTING PROJECT: 01377 December 23, 1975 -

FI! AL REPORT - 100 DAYS Page 5

~

Dry Film i

,4

. Thickness Delamina- Other -'

(Actual tion or Blister- Performance Performance --

I' l Coating System Thickness) Flaking Peeling ing Chalking Characteristics Evaluation t 58) p Carbo Zinc 11 9 mils 10 None 10 10 Slight salt de- Good -

(9.0 mile) posits; slight "mudcracking" of surface ..

6A)

Carbo Zinc 11 11 mils 10 None One > f 2 10 Slight salt de- Unacceptable f.

(12.5 mils) blister, posits; slight h ',

cracked "mudcracking" but intact of surface

68) h/

Carbo Zinc 11 11 alls 10 None 10 10 Slight salt de- .Very good Y (13.5 mils) posits; very ,

. alight " mud- ,

? cracking" ei 7A) ..

Carbo Zinc 11 15.0 mils 10 None One #2 10 One blister is Unacceptchle f

, (15.0 mile) blister, cracked but one 1-inch intact; slight blister, "mudcracking" one side 7B)

Carbo Zine 11 15.0 mils 10 None 10 10 Slight salt de- . Good l (15.0 mils) posits; moderate "muderacking"  !

Perfect Performance 10 None #4F to #8

, per ANSI N101.2-1975 #8HD (Light) l

, , i i

e l

e

  1. 9 f

5 , 'N - l -,-

g -

3.

I TESTING PROJECT: 01377 December 23, 1975 s FINAL REPORT - 100 DAYS Page 7 Dry Film Thickness Delanina- Other (Actual tion or Blister- Performance Performance Coating System Thickness) Flaking Peeling ing Chalking Characteristics Evaluation [j l 11A)

i I

Carbo Zinc 11 7 mils 10 , None One #4 10 Very slight Good Phenotine 305 1 mil blister, coating dis- ;p,

_ . (8.0 mile) one side coloration llB) I Very good Carbo Zinc 11 7 mils 10 None 10 10 Slight coating Phenoline 305 1 mil discoloration

_(7.8 mile) ,

?

! 12A)

Carbo Zinc 11 9 mils 10 None 10 10 Slight coating Good Phenoline 305 1 mil discoloration; (9.5 mils) surface has ..

rough texture l

12B) ,

Carbo Zinc 11 9 mils 10 None 10 10 Slight coating very good . ;.

Phenoline 305 1 mil discoloration (10.2 mils) ,

_13A)

Carbo Zinc 11 11 mils 10 None One >f2 10 Some blisters Unacceptable '-

Phenoline 305 1 mil blister, ate cracked,but (11.5 mils) one side; intact. Very

  1. 2F-B one slight coating side discoloration ,.

I i Perfect Performance 10 None #4F to f8 per ANSI N101.2-1975 #8HD (Light) f s

i

- t

MM

\ .

i TESTING PhdJECT: 01377 December 23, 1975 FINAL REPORT - 100 DAYS Page 8 '

Dry Film (

Thickness Delamina- Other (Actual tion or Blister- Performance Performance Coating System Thickness) Flaking Peeling ing Chalking Characteristics Evaluation ,

13B)

Carbo Zinc 11 11 mils 10 None #4 to 10 Slight coating Good Phenoline 305 1 mil #6F-B, discoloration (12.0 mile) one side 14A)

Carbo Zinc 11 13 mils 10 None #2F-B, one 10 Very slight Unacceptable Phenoline 305 1 mil side; #6 coating dis- ,$_,

, (15.0 mile) to #8F-B, coloration j one side 14B)

Carbo Zinc 11 13 mils 10 None 10 10 Slight coating Very good '. l Phenoline 305 1 mil discoloration A (15.0 mils)

Perfect Performance 10 None #4F to #8 '

per ANSI N101.2-1975 #8HD (Light) l l 1

,' l l

l l

.. /h c. M Patrick D. Fisher hn F. Montle Developmental Engineer Vice President Testing Department Research & Development PDF:sh XC: SLL/ttDT/JFH/EWS/JDP/CJW/JDB/SLS/DRL/ LAB CROUP LEADERS i

l I.

_ gp n : ,,

-- w q n ~

o - =- -

l

= . . . -: a-

.OT, w

LABORATORY TEST REPORT

.c O Testng Project Numcer: ._01931 . Octe: February _ 10, 1981 Report se . Final Time 7 days Octe of Grocting: 2-3-81 Tetci Desagn Test Durction _7_ days Requested by. Mr. D. W. McBride E: LOCA Testing of Carbo Zinc 11/Phenoline 305 Finish repairability .

PURPOSc: To determine the perfomance of Ic Carboline 191 Primer /lc Phenoline 305 '

Finish as a repair system for Carbo Zine 11/Phenoline 305 Finish over a surface preparation of 3M " Clean 'n Strip" and 3M "Rotopeen" when exposed to the PWR 307ay, j LOCA Curve and evaluated according to ANSI N101.2-1972, Section 4.5, as interpreted by Carboline. This is a proposed repair procedure for the Waterford Nuclear Station Unit f)3 which is being engineered by Ebasco Services, Inc.

I t.

i CONC'.USICNS: Af ter 7 days of the LOCA Curve, the Ic Carboline 191 Primer /lc

s Phenoline 305 Finish system over a surface preparation of 3M " Clean 'n Strip" and 3M "Rotopeen" exhibits an acceptable performance when evaluated according to ANSI N101.2-1972, Section, 4.5, as interpreted by Carboline.

e i

O!SCUSSICN:

i i

i i

i i

y From the Ccrec! ire Resecrch & Deve!coment Lcberatory The tecnnecci ccio furrvsned cre true arc occuc*e to the cest of our knowiecce However no marantee et occurcey a grven or vrcwed. C BPb OIirle vcer mn/on.1 ...u.

A CIlA/.n')'R f a m uv w vt i,w

n. , - a c a - .- .-<x pr , . - , ~ , .-

. . . ~ - -

q.y<_ .~ -,:a y.z . .

-- _ _<<s. .

i

' TESTING PROJECT: 01931 Februa ry 10, 1981 Final Report: 7 days Page 2 PROCEDURE:

'h A. Test Coupons

Description:

2"x4"xl/4" steel certified Carboline STI (See Appendix 1) l Surface Preparation: Gritblasted to SSPC-SPS-63 with a 2.0-3.0 mil blast profile.

Abrasive Medium: 50/50 mix of GFH #40 grit and S230 shot.

B. Systems Tested i Batch Thinning DFT l System Number Color Thinner Ratio Range ic Carbo Zine 11 A) OE5477M Green #33 i

B) OE1981Z 0300 9L1818M 12% 3.0-3.5 mils i Ic Phenoline 305 Finish A) OH1395M Gray Phenoline

B) CH1491M C705 9M2285M 10% 4.0-4.5 mils i

Carbo Zine 11/Phenoline 305 Finish was removed by SSPC-SP3-63, power tool l cleaning method. Detailed procedure is outlined in Section C; Repair Procedure.

Ic Carboline 191 Primer A) OC3362M Red #15 B) OC3361M 0500 9LO859M 15% 4.0-4.5 mils s_, Ic Phenoline 305 Finish A) OH1395M Gray Phenol.ine B) OH1491M C705 9M2285M 10% 3.0-3.5 mils C. Repair Procedure

1. Remove Carbo Zine 11/Phenoline 305 Finish with 3M's " Clean 'n Strip" wheel 4

l a. A residual amount of Carbo Zinc 11 is left on substrate.

2. Restore surface profile with 3M's "Rotopeen"
a. Operate power tool in two directions over substrate.
3. Solvent wipe substrate to remove grease and oil which may be present from power tool cleaning.

D. Cure Schedule 4

Carbo Zinc 11: Seven days at 100*F and 100% RH. Phenoline 305 Finish:

i 48 hours5.555556e-4 days <br />0.0133 hours <br />7.936508e-5 weeks <br />1.8264e-5 months <br /> at 72-76*F and 27-32% RH. Carboline 191 Primer: 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> at

} 73-77'F and 29-32% RH. Phenoline 305 Finish: 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br /> at 72-78'F and i

1 28-34% RH and a final

) cure at 150*F for 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />.

(-

k.s -)

L

,e w --m v wv--r-. ,.g-w- yv.vr g.y g %c ye-g.--emv-vg-. +wy ygy--w we.--i vy--

  • v 3 - ea - em+-y

^

.. W 3%-_ y? -

' r-=% +- -

' n -~ W %

~_6 -

I i

TESTING PROJECT: 01931 February 10, 1981

  • '}

Final Report: 7 days Page 3

( h E. Exposure PWR 307*F LOCA Curve

1. Time-Temperature-Pressure Curve I Time Temperature ** Pressure **

Initial Ambient Ambient Initial to 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br />, 47 minutes 307*F (153"C) 60 psig 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br />, 47 minutes to 96 hours0.00111 days <br />0.0267 hours <br />1.587302e-4 weeks <br />3.6528e-5 months <br />

  • 250*F (121*C) 30 psig 96 hours0.00111 days <br />0.0267 hours <br />1.587302e-4 weeks <br />3.6528e-5 months <br /> to 7 days 200*F (93*C) 10 psig I'
2. Water Chemistrv 0.28 Molar H 3B03 (3000 ppm Baron) 0.064 Molar Na 3 0

] 223

! NaOH added to adjust to a pH of 9.5 at 77*F (25*C) in deionized water

  • After 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> and 47 minutes of exposure, temperature of the test environment was reduced by spraying test solution at 200*F (93*C) into the test chamber which was at 307*F (153*C), giving a final temperature of 250*F (121*C).
    • These are theoretical values. The next page contains graphs of the

) theoretical and actual LOCA temperature and pressure curves. The data for the actual LOCA curves are taken from the chart recording for this test, which is stored in lab book (1230, page 57 Note: Test was interrupted to place spray nozzle in LOCA chamber. Time was added to test to make up for interruption.

. GRADING l PROCEDUPI: The test coupons were evaluated for performance in the following

' areas:

1) Material flaking off. 2) Delamination between coats and/or

. peeling. 3) Blistering of the topcoat. 4) Chalking of the topcoat.

t

5) Excessive cracking.

Grading procedures specified in Report N101.2-1972 of the American National Standards Institute - Protective Coatings for Light Water Nuclear Reactor Containment Facilities:

i e

h

~

O_

-r -

,;;p r+ , :.- g. ::p . . ,

.., p e

. 4 7 u .wg--

, ,9 .-_.

t

---~~~~~

Theeretical Actual 307*F PWR LOCA CURVE 400 -

Temperature O., ..-

300 -

N I.

i n , .

4 e - I

- i 1

, 7-------- --

Q i y - l

= / I f

l dc 200 - -

i W u i o /

C, /

a o

i

! b -

I soo -

1 4

10-1 100 101 102 103 10 10 5

10 6

, Time (Seconds) 80 -

Pressure

_ 60 - ,------------- ------------ -- ,

e

>9 i

/

D / I L / l w /

/ I

/ t G /

w , #

5 40 -

/

,/ l C 1 1 w / i b

l ,/ L 7--------------

e f

/ ,

/ ,

20 + / '

e '

t / i s

t

,r ,

i

. j 'm l

1 f

9 i

10-1 100 101 102 10 3 10 4 10 5 10 6

l Time (Seconds) i

_ - . . . e z -....-+.~....n....

e- r w y r g -yw- , - * - , _ - p - - - - - - - - * , - , - - - - , , - - , , , y, ---4, -

m.ri .--

.c -

>._.m .

.w . . 3,p u . ,

, . gj ._

TESTING PROJECT: 01931 Feb rua ry 10, 1981 ,

i Final Report: 7 days Page 4 s (" GRADING

'h PROCEDURE: (continued)

C:M 4.5 Methods of Examining and Evaluating the Exposed Test Specimens The dynamic and/or stacie elevated temperature pressure and irradiation test panels shall be evaluated within 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> and again after two weeks after l

removal from the test chamber for the following surface defects: flaking, delamination and/or peeling, blistering and chalking. Defects listed in Subsection 4.5.1 through 4.5.4 shall be dealt with as follows:

l 4.5.1 Flakir33 ASTM D772, Evaluating Degree of Resistance to Flaking (Sealing) of Exterior Paints, Part 21, American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA 19103. Flaking shall not be permitted.

4.5.2 Delimination and/or Peeling. Delasination and/or peeling shall not be permitted.

4.5.3 Plistering. Blistering shall be limitad to a few, intact blisters,

! Size No. 4, ASTM D714, Standard Method of Evaluating Degree of Blistering of Paints, Part 21, American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia ,

PA 19103. The number and the size of blisters shall be recorded.

4.5.4 Chalking. ASTM D659, Standard Method of Evaluating Degree of Resistance to Chalking of Exterior Paints, Part 21, American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA 19103. Eeavy chalking shall not be peceitted.

C', Any other changes in coating properties which are not also associated with the separation, or the release, of coating from the substrate shall not be a cause for rejection.

ANSI N101.2-1972 Criteria (As interpreted by Carboline) l Maximum Degree of Failure Allowable Flaking ASTM D772 10 (None) l Delamination or Peeling None j

  • Blistering ASTM D714-56 Blister Size Blister Density i
  1. 2 None
  • Note: A blister is not #4 Few intact when it has resulted #6 Medium in coating being separated #8 Medium-Dense i

l Chalking ASTM D659 6 (Moderate)

Note: Flaking, blistering and chalking are all evaluated according to ASTM Standards, with a rating of 10 indicating that no failure was observed in the j specific grading area.

's-J

.~ , , , . . _ . . . . . . . . , - . . . - -

't P LSTING PROJECT: 01931 February 10, 1981 .

Final Report: 7 days Page 5 RESULTS: PWR 307*F LOCA Curve 1

Panel Identification Dry Delanina- other and Film tion or Blister- Performance Performance l

. Coating System Thickness Flaking Peeling ing Chalking Characteristics Evaluation ,

lA)* -

l Carboline 191 Primer 4.5 mils 10 None #4F-B None --

Acceptable Phenoline 305 Finish 3.5 mils 8.0 mils 2A)

Carboline 191 Primer 4.5 mils 10 None #6M-B None --

Acceptable Phenoline 305 Finish 3.5 mils .

8.0 mils d

?:*

4 '

, i.'

, IIA.

4 Di i - Acceptable Performance #4F to ANSI N101.2-1972, Section 4.5, 10 None #6M to #6 (Moderate)

  • Panel suspended in the ,3.!

As Interpreted By Carboline #8MD vapor phase.

LAB /T-21878-1 ,e l

I i

t 6

4

. . , , . . . r. . ,

, .. __a  ;

i -

TESTING PROJECT: 01931 February 10, 1981 Final Report: 7 days Page 6 3

'~;;

b '

Sc Robert M. Reals John J. Ladage, Jr. J F. Montle Lab Technician Group Leader Vice President Testing Department Testing Department Research and Development l Jag /t.p. 01931 t

ec: S. Lopata/D. Porthouse/J. Montle/E. Skiles/S. Steinberg/P. Litzsinger/

M. Dugan/ Group Leaders C) m 4

e 4

p e >

]

' =

.y --

g, . < . .. , l e -

i

.e. .

' carboline Appendix 1 1

9 i Carboline Specification C31 I '

l Preparation of Ccucrete Specimens:

' Concrete Composition i

l Cement, ASDi C150, Type II. Low alkali y i Cravel, ASDi C33, size 3/8 inch

! Sand, ASDi C33 Water reducing admixture, ASDi C494

Air entra1=i=g admixture, ASDi C260 Pozzolans, ASti C618 Water - Domineralized or distilled water Concrete Proporrions .

Cement, 7 sacks per cubic yard Sand-Gravel ratio, 55 sand, 45 gravel by volume l Pozzolans, to 15 percent replacement of cement l Air entraining admixture, 4-7 percent j Water reducing 2Mvture, as per manufacturer's instructions Water, to produce a 3 inch slump Preparation of Test Specimen:

' Make and cure the specimen according to ASDi C192, except that no form oils =ay be used. The face to be tested shall be composed to the form to simulate poured walls and the wood traveled surfaces: Broom finish top surface to simulate floors. No test face shall be saw cut. When applicable, concrete' curing agents compatible with the coating system shall be used.

! Panels:

I

The size for concrete panels shall be 2 by 4 inches by 2 inches thick 1 0.2 inches.

Curing Time:

Before concrete specimens are coated, they shall be cured a =4"4 ~ = of 28 days in accordance with ACI 301, " Specifications for Structural Concrete for Buildings." If a concrete curing primer is used, it shall be applied

, on the concrete within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> after removal of the forms.

Carbo 11ne Specification ST1 Steel Test Specimens i Panels: The size for carbon steel panels shall be 2 by 4 inches by 1/4 inch thick + 0.1 inches with rounded edges and corners. The steel for

- ese.2 specimen shall caet the require =ents of ASDI A36, " Standard Specifi-cations for Structural Steel".

C

, ,, - . . -. - _ . , , , . . , - - , - . . - . , , , , - - - - . , . - ~ . a .,-,r. ,rn,- , -..--,.m

,.5-+- ,J('p.gf {' - vt .- . " y3f1 p y -- - "

  • g.v g.g.,, .* *: g ,.7 _7, . .- ,

,g ; ) ,

I s

.l . \.

l

. Anta coct 314 e 44.s ooo

,; .b'Jdh AT.lCZEE.:.~7.' ETA % i caeLa CAR 8oCO-stLoves O' carboh* rie .

PROTECTIVE COATI N G S ran ConieosioN mEsisTANCE o W ATERPROOFING e FIRE PROTECTION e ROOFING August 26, 1983 i Mr. Mark Wells l Civil Engineering j Comanche Peak Station

? P.O. Boy. 1001 i Glenrose, TX 76043 l

Dear Mr. Wells:

i Please find enclosed a copy of test report 01931 sent to a Mr.

Tom Kelly of Ebasco. Mr. Kelly requested I forward a copy to you. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to call.

i Sincerely, Steve Harrison M h l Power Industry Specialist t

t SJH/bgf f

i cc: Charles Rushing e

I t

l I

i cAReoLINE COMPANY

  • 350 HANLEY INOusTRIAL court
  • ST. Louts. MIS 5ouRt 63144 I

T

, - . . -- _ _ _ . . _ - _ _ , _ _ ,__.m._. . . _ _ _ _ . . . _ _ . . _ _ . _ , , , , _ _ . . , _ . , _ , . _ __ _ , _ _ , , , , , _ _ , . . . . __m. _ _ . . _ , . _ _ . _ . _ _ _ _ . .

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20138N994&oldid=2864541"