ML20082N066

Rev 2 to QA plan.Third-party Const Implementation Overview Encl

ML20082N066
Person / Time
Site:	Midland
Issue date:	10/25/1983
From:	Baranow S, Kelly R STONE & WEBSTER, INC.
To:
Shared Package
ML20082N062	List: ML20082N060 ML20082N066
References
NUDOCS 8312060370
Download: ML20082N066 (9)

Text

.9-Revision 2 J.0. No. 14509 Midland Plant Units 1 & 2 Consumer Power Company Third Party Construction Implementation Overview PROJECT QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN Ap rovals: Dates:

$ A A Y/5 Program Manager

% 0dber-Z$ /G93 '

Lhief Engineer 3 Engineering Assurance OC rs}s t 10./98 5 Mahager /

/

Quality Assurance SCOPE j This procedure describes the quality assurance plan for activities performed by Stone & Webster Michigan (S&W) for the Consumers Power Company's (CPCo) Midland Plant- Units One and Two. The work involved in this third party overview is described in applicable CPCo specifications and procedures and shall be accom-plished in toe following manner:

l a. Development of an. overview program and preparation of a Project Quality Plan,

b. Review of the design and construction documents to gain familiarity with the work.

c. Assessment of the adequacy of technical and related administrative construc-l tion and quality procedures.

Assessment of the degree of compliance with technical and administrative d.

construction and quality procedures.

e. Assessments are made by conducting audits, monitoring (surveillance) inspec-tions, and redundant (sample) inspections.

i o f. Daily reviews as necessary with the Owner to obtain any clarifying information l rw and project documents that are needed to carry out this program. The Owner and S&W will establish a specific communication plan at the start of the 88 gg work.

n

i$ g. Submittal of brief weekly progress reports and a final report to the NRC with o n.< a copy to CPCo.

h. S&W will not be responsible for implementing corrective action, however, their professional opinion may be requested.

9

Revision 2 g Page 2 PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS AND ACTIVITIES I. ORGANIZATION The overall Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation (SWEC) organization is depicted in SWSQAP 1-74A (Section I). A Program Manager will function as the site leader for the third party. overview. Project organization is described in the Project Program Plan.

I I'. QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM The overall SWEC quality assuran.ce program is designed to provide assurance that all SWEC activities are accomplished in a controlled manner. The SWEC corporate QA program complies with 10CFR50, Appendix B, and NRC Regulatory Guides, and is described in an NRC approved \opical report, SWSQAP 1-74A,

" Standard Nuclear Quality Assurance Program."

This quality assurance plan shall be maintained up-to-date to reflect any changes in the scope of S&W work.

This quality assurance plan identifies the procedures which implement the overall QA program as it applies to the S&W scope. Insof ar as possible, applicable standard SWEC procedures will be used to govern the work. When standard procedures do not fit project circumstances, project procedures will be issued to govern the work. Variances from standard SWEC procedures will be approve'd according to Quality Standard (QS) 5.1 and Engineering Assurance 4

Procedure (EAP) 5.7.

Personnel performing activities in accordance with this plan requiring quali-fication and certification will be qualified and certified in accordance with Quality Standard 2.12 and Quality Assurance Directive 2.5.

III. DESIGN CONTROL (Not within the S&W scope) l s l IV. PROCUREMENT DOCUMENT CONTROL Consulting Services, as required, are procured in accordance with Engineering Assurance Procedures 4.1 and 4.15, which are supplemented by Project Proce-I dure (PP) (LATER).

V. INSTRUCTIONS, PROCEDURES, AND DRAWINGS g

l- S&W procedures, including variances, are prepared and controlled in ac-cordance with Section II of tnis QA plan.

(Instructions, drawings and specifications are not within the S&.! scope).

VI. DOCUMENT CONTROL l Plans, procedures, instructions, and documents prepared and implemented by 2 S&W will be controlled per PP (later).

'a Revision 2

, Page 3 VII. CONTROL OF PURCHASED MATERIAL, PARTS, EQUIPMENT, AND SERVICES (Control of Purchased Material, Parts and Equipment - not within the S&W scope).

Control of Services is in accordance with Engineering Assurance Procedure

, 7.1.

, VIII. IDENTIFICATION AND CONTROL 0F MATERIAL, PARTS, AND C0 W ONENTS

, (Not within the S&W scoge)

IX. CONTROL 0F SPECIAL PROCESS (Not within the S&W scope)

X. INSPECTION ,

f Monitoring inspections are conducted on a surveillance basis to assess on-

! going CCP activities. Redun' dant sample inspections are conducted after ac- 2 ceptance of an , area, commodity, or product by CPCo as a final assessment measure.

XI. TEST CONTROL (Not within the S&W' scope) -

~

XII. CONTROL 0F MEASURING AND TEST EQUIPMENT

~

(Not within the S&W scope) c .

XIII. HANDLING, STORAGE, AND SHIPPING (Not within the S&W scope)

XIV. INSPECTION, TEST, AND OPERATING STATUS *

(Not within the S&W scope)

XV. NONCONFORMING MATERIAL, PARTS, OR COMPONENTS Nonconfonnances observed by S&W during monitoring and sample inspections are reported in writing to the NRC with copy to CPCo. These reports will be used in establishing the extent of inspection and adjustments to the extent of inspection by trend analysis.

XVI. CORRECTIVE ACTION The criteria for the identif.ication of conditions that require review to determine reportability under 10CFR50.55(e) and/or 10CFR21 are defined in QS/EAP-16.2 and QS/EAP-16.3, respectively. Identified conditions are pro-cessed for review / evaluation in accordance with Project Procedure "Noncon-formance Identification and Reporting."

i

Revision 2 Paga 4~

XVII. QUALITY ASSURANCE RECORDS S&W General Policy and Procedure for records collection, retention, and turn-over to Consumers Power Company are described in QS-17.1, EAP-17.2 and QAD-17.1 and as detailed in the scope under items f. and g. QAD-17.1 and EAP-17.2 are supplemented by PP (LATER).

4 XVIII. AUDITS Audits of the S&W CIO program are performed in accordance with QS-18.1 and 2 QAD's 18.1 and 18.2. ] l ,

4 e

1 f

I 0

l 1

wr- -+---r my,--,e--v-- ,- -r,- -- -g- -

p,- -,- ,e,- -wr,- - ,,---+ -yw-y -mp-- ,-we- -w-e'---+-+r,-,--wr-+ - -- , ,-wa er

_ l I

.l.0.No. 14509 Date October 26, 1983

. Midland Plant Units 1 & 2 Revision 2 THIRD PARTY CONSTRUCTION IMPLEMENTATION OVERVIEW Approval:

4 Date /oM(//3 '

/-

• Manager Quality Assurance f L bith

' Program ianaget-Date hh3 '

l.0 PURPOSE AND SCOPE Tb establish a program whereby Stone & Webster Michigan (S&W) performs in- 2

' ~ i dependent evaluations and verifications of the Consumers Power Company (CPCo)

Construction Completion Program, (CCP) reports progress, observations, and non-conformances to the program; specifically, to verify:

1.1 Management performance is adequate in the following areas:

A '. Establishment of tim Management Review Committee .

B. Duties and responsibilities of the Review'Consnittee are' clearly defined C. Procedures governing the actions of the Review Committee are in place ,

D. Management reviews are complete, effective, and conducted in ac-

, cordance with the requirements of the CCP Program ,

l 1.2 CCP procedures, instructions, inspection plans, records, and prerequisites for inspections /reinspections have been satisfactorily approved prior to implementation.

1.3 Specific CPCo consnitments to the NRC are identified to f acilitate track-ing;' dates fo? compliance (as appropriate) are adequately identified; appropriate ac ; ion parties are clearly identified; consnitted actions have been satisfact)rily res01ved.

1.4 Procedures, prerequisites, and reinspection attributes in References 2.1, >

2.2 and 2.3 have been approved by the Management Review Consnittee.

\

'\

- . ,.,. . . - . . _ . _ - . . . - . . . - . . . - . _ , - . _ . - _ . - . - - . . ~ . , _ ~ _ . . . - _ _ _ - _ . . - _ - .- , - ..

Revision 2 Page 2

.m l.5 Personnel assigned to implement the CCP Program have been properly trained, qualified and certified in accordance with. the requirements of ANSI-N45.2.6; SNT-TC-1A and MPQAD Procedure B-3M-1, Qualification and Certification of Inspection - and Test Personnel. Construction and craft personnel shall be trained to meet the requirements of the Construction Training Procedure FPG-2.000. ,

! 1.6 The effectiveness of the Quality Verification Program based on witnessing i inspections /reinspections 'of selected component installation, fabrication and review of applicable test / inspection reports and records.

1.7 Measures have been developed to ensure that NRC hold points are clearly

, identified and controls are in evidence to prevent continuance of work pending clearance of the hold points. ,

2.0 REFERENCES

2.1 Quality Verification Program Doctment, April 16, 1983 2.2 Construction Completion Program ,

a. Letters J.W. Cook to the NRC: January 10, 1983 April 6,' 1983

,(

April 22,1983 l 1. August 26, 1983 2 2.3 Nonconformance Identification and Reporting Procedure r

3.0 ATTACHENTS i 3.1 Evaluation Attribute Checklist 3.2 Verification Attribute Checklist -

3.3 Nonconformance Identification Report 4,. 0 DEFINITIONS 4.1 Construction Completion Program,(CCP)

A. program to provide guidance in planning and management of design and quality activities necessary for completion of construction of the plant and verification of completed work.

4.2 Quality Verification Program (QVP)

! An element of the CCP used to confinn the quality status of safety related procurement and construction activities completed and inspected by the Engineer-Constructor personnel prior to December 2,1982.

4.3 Evaluation Assessment of quality. related act'ivities based upon review of procedures \,s,

. plans, instructions, inspection reports, test results and additional %

. _ _ _ _._ conn _i_tmen ts,._. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Revision 2 Page 3 I

NOTE Documentation resulting from resolution of CPCo commitments to the NRC and NRC Hold Points shall be 100% reviewed to verify that proper corrective action has been accom-plished. ,

4.4 Verific ation -

Confinning, substantiating or assuring.that CCP and QVP requirements have 2 been implemented and are adequate. Verification actions may include docu-mentation, hardware and management systems. -

NOTE Verification of the CCP and QVP Programs will be accompli.shed by monitoring and sam- 2 ple inspections in sufficient detail to en-sure adequate CPCo implementation.

5.0 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS i 5.1 All personnel i assigned quality assurance program evaluation responsibil-V ities shall be certified auditors in accordance with ANSI-N45,2.23 and applicable SWEC procedures.

5.2- All personnel assigned construction verification responsibilities shall be certified inspectors in accordance with ANSI-N45.2.6 and ' applicable SWEC procedure's and ' possess the appropriate combination of education, ex-perience and training.

5.3 The Third Party Construction Implementation Overview (CIO) program will be N structured to determine, by evaluation of predetermined procedures and instructions, the quality practices utilized. in the construction of the Midland Plant Units 1, 2, and the effectiveness of those practices.

5.4 A site . team will be established to monitor the effectiveness of the Con-I struction Completion Program. The team will consist of a Program-Manager 1

and two functional ' groups. One group will assess the completeness of compliance with procedures and inspection plans being used to complete the. .

work. The other group will review certain aspects of construction activi-ties which relate to the performance of the Quality Control Inspection Program. These two groups will use special procedures, attribute check-lists, and random sampling techniques to evaluate the following:

A. Adequacy and implementation of CPCo procedures regarding construc-l tion activities, personnel qualification, training programs, and organizational practices.

B. Compliance of Construction Completion Program teams to prescribed procedures, s

\

- . - , - _ . . . . _ , _ _ _ - . _ . . ,___ __f__

.c Revision 2 Page 4

^

C. Compliance of Midland Project Quality Assurance (MPQAD) pe;sonnel to applicable inspection procedures.

D. Compliance of construction activities to applicable procedures.

5.5 The Program Manager shall maintain connunications with the NRC and CPCo Site Manager. Monthly progress meetings shall be held with the NRC and CPCo to discuss progress and report on nonconformance and observations.

5.6 Programmatic nonconformances of a serious, nature shall be immediately reported to the NRC and CPCo. -

6.0 PROCEDURES 6.1 The following procedures shall be prepared to control the activities of the Construction Implementation Overview (CIO) teams. ,

l A. Quality Control Instruction 10.01 Constructiot Implem\entation Overview Assessment \\

l .

6.2 The site teams shall develop attribute checklists for each evaluation and verification activity. Attributes shall be selected from the CCP, PQCI's, CPCo conmiittaents to the NRC and other applicable requirements.

I 6.3 Auditors assigned to conduct evaluations shall, utilizing attribute check- /2 lists, verify that acceptable quality practices are evident in the per-formance of each activity.

N The results of each evaluation shall be documented on the attribute check- -

list to ensure repeatability. Surunaries of the results shall be tabulated weekly for presentation to the NRC and CPCo.

6.4 Inspectors assigned to conduct verification shall, utilizing the check-list, monitor the activities of CPCo personnel involved in CCP and QVP.

activities.

6.5 All systems verified shall be identified and documented to assure repeat-ability.

6.6 Nonconformances identified in conjunction with this _ procedure shall be ~

documented on a Nonconformance Identification Report (NIR) and processed l

in accordance with Reference 2.3 of this procedure. \2 7.0 REPORTS ,

7.1 The following reports will be submitted to NRC and CPCo and S&W by the Program Manager.

A. Weekly Progress Reports B. Monthly Meeting Reports C. Final ~ Reports on Construction Completion

\

Revision 2 Page 5 7.2 Weekly Progress Reports - Weekly Progress Reports will be submitted to the USNRC and CPCo.

7.3 Monthly Meeting Report The Monthly Meeting Reoort shall consist of the minutes of monthly meetings conducted by the USNRC with the public in 2 attendance. Copies of the minutes of the meetings shall be transmitted to the USNRC and CPCo.,

7.4 Final Report - A final report will be submitted 3d days af ter completion of the program. The report will summarize the S&W assessment. The final l report will be submitted by the Program Manager to' the NRC, CPCo and S&W.

l O

l I a t

I

! \

-s

,. . ,,, . . - . . . , . -- -- -- .~ . . -

. - . - - . _ - _ _ . . . . _ - , . - - . .