ML17348B456

From kanterella
Revision as of 21:44, 3 February 2020 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
LER 92-003-00:on 920224 & 27,discovered That Component Cooling Water Channel Head Drain Valves Not Post Installation Tested Per ASME Code & Ts.Caused by Personnel Error.Personnel Trained & Records revised.W/920330 Ltr
ML17348B456
Person / Time
Site: Turkey Point NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 03/30/1992
From: Knorr J, Plunkett T
FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO.
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
L-92-090, L-92-90, LER-92-003-01, LER-92-3-1, NUDOCS 9204060253
Download: ML17348B456 (10)


Text

ACCELERATED 'DISTRIBUTION DEMONSTRATION SYSTEM REGULARLY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTI SYSTEM (RIDS)

ACCESSION NBR:9204060253 ,DOC.'DATE: 92/03/30 NOTARIZED: NO DOCKET g N~IL:50--251 Turkey Point Plant, Unit 4, Florida Power and Light C 05000251 "AUTH.NAME AUTHOR .AFFILIATION KNORR",J.E. Florida Power & Light Co.

PLUNKETT,T.F. Florida Power & Light Co.

RECIP.NAME RECIPiENT AFFILIATION

SUBJECT:

, LER 92-003-00:on 920224 & 27.,discovered that component cooling water channel head drain valves not post installation tested per ASME Code & TS.Caused by personnel error. Personnel trained & records revised.W/920330 ltr.

DISTRIBUTION'ODE: IE22T COPIES RECEIVED:LTR l ENCL' SIZE:

TITLE: 50.73/50.9 Licensee Event Report (LER), -Incident Rpt, etc.

NOTES:NRR RAGHAVAN,L 05000251 RECIPIENT RECIPIENT COPIES ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL PD2-2 LA .1 1 PD2-2 PD . 1 1 AULUCK,R 1 1 INTERNAL: ACNW 2 2 ,AEOD/DOA 1 1 AEOD/DSP/TPAB '1 1 AEOD/ROAB/DSP 2 2 NRR/DET/EMEB 7E 1 1 'NRR/DLPQ/LHFB10 '1 1 1 1 NRR/DOEA/OEAB 1 1 RES/DSIR/EIB'OPIES NRR/DLPQ/LPEB10'RR/DREP/PRPB11

.'2 2 NRR/DST/SELB 8D 1 - 1

.NRR/DST/SICB8H3 1 '1 NRR/DST/SPLB8D1 1 1.

RE+A-.I LE ~~0.2~

NRR/DST/SRXB 8E 1 1

1 1 RGN2 'ILE 01 1

1 1

1 EXTERNAL: EG&G BRYCEPJ'H 3. 3 L ST LOBBY,WARD 1 NRC .PDR 1 1 NSIC MURPHY,G.A 1 '1 NSIC POOREiW. 1 1 NUDOCS FULL TXT 1 1 NOTES: 1 1 NOTE'TO ALL "RIDS"'ECIPIENTS:

PLEASE HELP US TO REDUCE WASTE! CONTACT THE DOCUMENT CONTROL DESK, ROOM Pl-37 (EXT. 20079), TO ELIMINATEYOUR'NAME FROM DISTRIBUTIONISTS FOR DOCUMENTS YOU DON'T NEED!

FULL TEXT CONVERSION REQUIRED TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED:, LTTR 31 ENCL 31

0 l

P.O. Box 029100, Miami, FL, 33102-9100 NR SO 1982 L-92-090 10 CFR 50.73 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washingtonr D C 20555 Gentlemen:

Re: Turkey Point Unit 4 Docket No. 50-251 Reportable Event: 92-003-00 Component Cooling Water Channel Head Drain Valves not Post-installation Tested in Accordance With Technical S ecification 4.0.5..

The attached Licensee Event Report 251-92-003-00 is being provided in accordance with 10 CFR 50.73 (a) (2) (i) (B) .

If there are any questions please contact us.,

Very truly. yours, T. F. Plunkett Vice President Turkey Point Nuclear TFP/JEK/3k enclosures cc: Stewart D. Ebneter, Regional Administrator, Region II, USNRC Ross C. Butcher, Senior Resident Inspector, USNRC, Turkey Point Plant

('~d<i 9204060253 920330 PDR ADOCK 0500025l S PDR

~ ar'Pi Group coruparp

t' LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)

DOCKET NUMBER (2) PAGE (3)

FACILITY NAYS (1)

TURKEY POINT, UNIT 4 05000251 1 oF 3 TITLE (4)

Component Cooling Water Channel Head Drain Valves not Post-installation Tested in Accordance With Technical Specification 4.0.,5.

EVENT DATE (5) LER"NUMBER(6) RPT DATE (7) OTHER FACILITIES INV (8)

MON DAY YR YR SEO 4 R4 MON 'AY YR ,FACILITY NAMES DOCKET 6 (S) 02 27 92 92 003 00 03 30 92 OPERATING MODE (9) 10 CFR '50.73 a 2 '

B POWER LEVEL ( 1 0) 100 LICENSEE CONTACT FOR THIS LER (12)

James E. Knorr, Regulation and Compliance Specialist Tele hone Number (305) 246 6757 COMPLETE ONE LINE FOR EACH COMPONENT FAILURE DESCRIBED IN THIS REPORT (13)

CAUSE SYSTEM COMPONENT MANUFACTURER NPRDS2 'AUSE SYSTEM COMPONENT MANUFACTURER NPRDS2 EXPECTED DAY YEAR SUPPLEYSNTAL REPORT EXPECTED (14) YES SUBMISSION DATE (15)

(II Yee, comPlete EXPECTED SUBMISSION DATE)

ABSTRACT (16)

On February 24, 1992, during a review of post maintenance work, Florida Power and Light Company discovered that the post maintenance testing performed on a valve was not correct since, identifying the work as .an ASME Section XI Repair/Replacement, was not identified on the work plan.

A,subsequent record review of similar valve repairs identified, on February 27, 1992, that post maintenance testing of valve'3-50-377 was also not in accordance with ASME Section XI Repair/Replacement"A"requizements. The record review revealed that on October 18, 1991, the Unit 4 CCW heat exchanger channel head drain valve (4-50-377) was replaced to repair a leak. Post maintenance testing was performed in accordance with a repair scope of valve packing adjustment as opposed to valve replacement prior to return of the heat exchanger to service.

Since the work scope had changed and the quality group of the valve was not designated, testing in accordance with Technical Specification 4.0..5 "Surveillance Requirements for inservice testing of ASME Code Class 1, 2, and 3 components," was not completed prior to return of the heat, exchanger to operation.

Successful testing of valve 4-50-377 at nominal operating pressure and temperature was completed on February 27, 1992.

0 ENT (LER) . TEXT FZINUATION

'2 LICENSEE REPORT FACILITY NAME TURKEY 'R'OINT UNIT 4'5000251 DOCKET NUMBER LER NUMBER 92-003-00 PAGE NO.

OF 03 k

I. EVENT DESCRIPTION.

On February= 24, 1992, during a review of post maintenance work on a similar valve (4-50-364), Florida Power and Light Company discovered that the post maintenance testing performed on valve 4-50-364 was not correct since the quality group, identifying the work as an ASME Section XI Repair/Replacement, was not identified on the work plan.

The Component Cooling Water (CCW) heat exchanger associated with this valve had been out of service duri'ng the valve repair and remained so until the valve was tested in accordance with Section XI.

A subsequent record review of similar valve repairs identified, on February 27, 1992, that post maintenance testing of valve 3-50-377 was also not in accordance with ASME Section XI Repair/Replacement requirements. The record review revealed that on October 18, 1991, the Unit 4 "A" CCW heat exchanger channel head drain valve (4 377) (EIIS:CC) (Component:DRN-V) was replaced to repair a leak.

Post maintenance testing was performed in accordance with the maintenance work package prepared for the original repair .scope of work (valve packing adjustment as opposed to replacement) prior to return of the heat exchanger (EIIS-CC) (Component:HX) to service.

Since the work scope had changed and the quality group'of the valve was not designated, testing in accordance with Technical Specification 4.0.5 "Surveillance Requirements for inservice testing of ASME Code Class 1, 2, and 3'omponents," was not completed prior to return to operation'.

Successful testing of valve 4-50-377 at nominal operating pressure and temperature, in accordance with Administrative Procedure AP 190.90, "ASME Section XI Pressure Tests for Quality Group A, B, and C Systems/Components,'" was completed on February 27, 1992. The "A" CCW heat exchanger was considered. operable at the successful completion of the test.

ZI. EVENT CAUSE The cause was cognitive personnel error by non-licensed utility personnel. During the process of job planning for the replacement of valve 4-50-377, the quality group of the valve was not identified since the valve was quality related and therefore, an assumption was made by maintenance personnel that the quality related designation meant that the valve would not have a Quality Group A, B, or C designation. The correct quality group was Quality Group C .

(equivalent to Code Class 3) . As, a result of the missing classification designation on the work plan, the work package was not routed to Inservice Inspection personnel after the work scope change for the designation of the required inservice inspection needed prior to returning the system to service.

A contributing cause is the failure to revisit the additional needed post maintenance testing required after the change in work scope from packing adjustment to valve replacement.

il 41 LZCENSEETENT REPORT (LER) TEXT NTZNUATZON FACILITY NAME DOCKET NUMBER LER NUMBER PAGE NO.

TURKEY POINT UNIT 4 05000251, 92-003-00: 03 oF 03 ZZZ. EVENT SAFETY 'ANALYSIS I

Valve 4-50-377 is a drain valve on the Intake Cooling Water channel head of the Unit 4 "A" CCW heat exchanger. The valve is in a 1.5 inch drain line. Intake cooling water is brackish water from the circulating water canals at Turkey Point Plant. The normal operating pressure for the Intake -Cooling Water system at this location is approximately 6 psig. An operability evaluation was conducted on the as-found condition of an untested drain valve on this header. Assuming the total failure of the valve in the open position as worst case, the "A" CCW heat exchanger Intake Cooling Water flow remains adequate and the heat exchanger is Therefore, the health and safety of plant personnel and still'perable.

the general public was not compromised.

ZV. CORRECTIVE ACTIONS

1. Successful testing of valve 4-50-377 at nominal, operating .

pressure and temperature in 'accordance with Technical Specification 4.0.5 was completed on February 27, 1992.

2. Maintenance personnel have been trained to verify the quality group designation for equipment by=-review of various related design documentation. These personnel have also been trained on the importance of reviewing the complete package for scope changes which could require post-maintenance testing changes. The initial and continuing training program for this work group will be revised to reflect the information in this Licensee Event Report prior to June 1, 1992.
3. Quality Control personnel have, reviewed all ready to work Plant Work Orders to ensure that the quality groups specified are correct.

Additionally, previous work plans for similar quality related equipment were reviewed to ensure correct specification of quality groups.

4. Records providing the quality group of this valve and similar valves installed on both Turkey Point Units 3 and 4'ave been revised to reflect the correct status.

V. ADDITIONAL.INFORMAT1ON Similar Events: LER 250-90-002, "Post-maintenance test not performed to establish operability of a phase A containment isolation valve after adjusting the valve stem packing due to personnel error."

0 N