ML19263B243

From kanterella
Revision as of 05:48, 26 October 2019 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Ack Receipt of NRC 781220 Ltr Re License Amend Fees for Review of Application.Disagrees W/Determination That Reviews Are Necessary for Each Unit.Wishes to Disregard Unit 1 Application
ML19263B243
Person / Time
Site: Point Beach  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 01/05/1979
From: Durstein S
WISCONSIN ELECTRIC POWER CO.
To: Harold Denton
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NUDOCS 7901150066
Download: ML19263B243 (1)


Text

O Wisconsin Electnc powca coursur 231 W. MICHIGAN, P.O. BOX 2046. MitWAUKEE WI 53201 January 5, 1979 Mr. Harold R. Denton, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Washington, D. C. 20555 Attention: Reba M. Diggs License Fee Management Branch Gentlemen:

DOCKET NOS. 50-266 AND 50-301 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION CHANGE REQUEST #57 POINT BEACH NUCLEAR PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2 We have received your letter dated December 20, 1978, in which you advised us that the license amendment fees which we provided with our application of November 16, 1978, have been determined to be insufficient to permit review of that application.

We do not agree with your determination that the reviews necessary to approve these revisions to the heatup and cooldown limitation curves for the Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2, are signi-ficantly different to require two Class III amendment fees.

As you know, we are required to request a revision to the heatup and cooldown limitation curves for only Point Beach Unit 2 at this time. The Unit 1 curves will not require revision until sometime in 1980 However, because both the Unit 1 and Unit 2 curves are predicted anu revised using identical techniques, as presented in Westinghouse Tc e ical Reports WCAP-8738 and WCAP-8743, we believed that the NRC Staff's review time would be most effectively utilized by submitting both units' revisions at the same time. It nhould be noted that the previous revisions to these curves, issued by the NRC on February 24, 1977, were likewise submitted, reviewed, and approved at the same time.

If you do not agree on our position with respect to the license mnendment fees, please disregard that portion of our November 16, 1978, application which requested amendments of Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Unit 1, Facility Operating License DPR-24. We shall resubmit this portion of our application when it becomes necessary. In that case, we request that the $400 overpayment of mnendment application fees be refunded.

Very truly yours,

^ m

\

hf ?, D Sol Burstein Executive Vice President g 2 90115 0 0GG A /p%