ML062090294

Email: (PA) Quality Assurance for Aging Management of NSR Components

ML062090294
Person / Time
Site:	Pilgrim
Issue date:	07/05/2006
From:	- No Known Affiliation
To:	Jennifer Davis Division of Regulatory Improvement Programs
References
TAC MC9669
Download: ML062090294 (3)

Text

James Davis -Re: Quality Assurance for aging management of NSR components Page 1 From: <erachp@comcast.net>

To: "James Davis" <JAD@nrc.gov>

Date: Wed, Jul 5, 2006 5:33 PM

Subject:

Re: Quality Assurance for aging management of NSR components Jim, Is that all you want me to put in section 3.0.4. Just two lines?This is what will also go in the SER. The SRP write-up is pretty clear on what the reviewer should be looking for, specifically, is 10 CFR 50 App.B also used for non-safety related components?

LRA B.0.3, Confrimation Process, and Administrative Controls, the applicant states that "the Entergy QA program applies to safety-related structures and components." They do not make a similarf statement in Corrective Actions.Please confirm and I will incorporate the two lines in the new section 3.0.4. Do you have any references that you reviewed?Erach--------------

Original message --------------

From: "James Davis" <JAD@nrc.gov>

> Erach,> Attached is the writeup for the corrective action plan.> Jim" >>> 07/05/2006 1:21 PM >>>> Hi," In each of the AMR sections in the SRP, under AMR results for which further" evaluation is recommended, we need to address how the applicant has applied" their Corrective Action program to non-safety related components.

This is" intended to address elements 7-9 in the AMPs." These sections in the SRP are: " 3.1.2.2.18, 3.2.2.2.10, 3.3.2.2.15, 3.4.2.2.10, 3.5.2.2.3, and 3.6.2.2.4.

> Jim Davis and I discussed this today, and here is how we will address it.> In the Audit and review report, in the above listed sections, please make the> following statement:

> 3.1.2.2.15 (etc.) Quality Assurance for Aging Management of Non-> Safety Related Components" The applicant referenced LRA Section B.0.3. The project team's evaluation of" Section B.0.3 is provided in Section 3.0.4 of this audit and review report." I will create a new Section 3.0.4 in the AMP part of the audit and review" report. Jim Davis reviewed the PNPS Corrective Action program and will provide" me the appropriate words to include in this section.> If you have any questions, please call me or e-mail me.> erach James Davis -project staff review -corrective action plan.wpd Page 1 The project staff reviewed the applicant's corrective action procedure and found it to be acceptable.

The corrective action procedure is reviewed on a routine basis by the regional inspection teams and has been found to be acceptable during past inspections.

c:\temp\GW}OOO01 .TMP Page 1 1 cAtemp\GW)00001.TMP Page 1 ýI Mail Envelope Properties (44AC3006.727

21:14119)

Subject:

Creation Date From: Created By: Re: Quality Assurance for aging management of NSR components Wed, Jul 5, 2006 5:32 PM<erachp @ comcast.net>

erachp @ comcast.net Recipients nrc.gov OWGWPOO3.HQGWDOO1 JAD (James Davis)Post Office OWGWPO03.HQGWDO01 Route nrc.gov Files MESSAGE TEXT.htm Mail Mime.822 Options Expiration Date: Priority: ReplyRequested:

Return Notification:

Concealed

Subject:

Security: Size 1974 2491 Date & Time Wednesday, July 5, 2006 5:32 PM 10012 None Standard No None No Standard Junk Mail Handling Evaluation Results Message is eligible for Junk Mail handling This message was not classified as Junk Mail Junk Mail settings when this message was delivered Junk Mail handling disabled by User Junk Mail handling disabled by Administrator Junk List is not enabled Junk Mail using personal address books is not enabled Block List is not enabled