ML062120647
| ML062120647 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Pilgrim |
| Issue date: | 05/04/2006 |
| From: | Pavinich W - No Known Affiliation |
| To: | Wen P Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| %dam200612, TAC MC9669 | |
| Download: ML062120647 (3) | |
Text
James Davis - Re: Re-assignment of Tables 3.3.2.14-X Page 1 From:
<wapavinich @comcast.net>
To:
<erachp@comcast.net>, Peter Wen <pxw@nrc.gov>
Date:
Thu, May 4, 2006 8:33 AM
Subject:
Re: Re-assignment of Tables 3.3.2.14-X
- Erach, I think we should include the review in sections 3.2, 3.3, and 3.4 as appropriate.
Wayne Original message ----------------------
From: erachp@comcast.net
> Peter and Wayne,
> As I was finishing up the review of section 3.3 Tables, I realized that PNPS has
> included all mechanical systems associated with nonsafety-related components
> affecting safety-related systems into sections 3.3, iresrective of the system
> being part of ESF or Steam and Power Conversion systems. These are shown in
> Tables 3.3.2-14-1 thru 3.3.2.-14-35.
> I discussed this with you, Peter, and we agreed that these Tables should be
> re-assigned from me to the appropriate team member, either yourself for section
> 3.4 systems and Wayne Pavinich for section 3.2 systems. None of section 3.1
> systems are involved. PNPS should have included these tables in the appropriate
> sections where the non-safety related systems belong. No wonder I had over 60%
> of line items in my scope.
> Based on our discussion, I have revised the PNPS consolidated table EXCEL
> spreadsheet accordingly and have attached it to this e-mail. Please review
> these tables similarly as you review the section 3.2 or 3.4 tables.
> We should discuss and finalize how we are going to write the Audit report and
> the SER relative to these tables. Should the appropriate table review be
> included all in section 3.3, or should we really include the review in sections
> 3.2, 3.3, and 3.4 as appropriate?
> We need to let Entergy know that the LRA should reflect systems in section 3 in
> the appropriate subsections where they belong and not lumped into one
> subsection.
Erach CC:
Ram Subbaratnam <rxs2@nrc.gov>, Joe Zabel <JZabel@atlintl.com>, Mark Orr
<MPOrr@atlintl.com>, Bob Jackson <JacksonWR@msn.com>, Jim Davis <jad@nrc.gov>
I c:\\temp\\GWOOOO"1.TMP..
Mail Envelope Properties (4459F492.1OA:19 :24842)
Page 1.1
Subject:
Creation Date From:
Created By:
Re: Re-assignment of Tables 3.3.2.14-X Thu, May 4, 2006 8:31 AM
<wapavinich @comcast.net>
wapavinich @comcast.net Recipients nrc.gov TWGWPO02.HQGWDO01 PXW (Peter Wen)
RXS2 CC (Ram Subbaratnam) nrc.gov OWGWPOO1.HQGWDOO1 JAD CC (James Davis) msn.com JacksonWR CC (Bob Jackson) atlintl.com MPOrr CC (Mark Orr)
JZabel CC (Joe Zabel) comcast.net erachp Post Office TWGWPO02.HQGWDO01 OWGWPOO1.HQGWDOO1 Route nrc.gov nrc.gov msn.com atlintl.com comcast.net Files MESSAGE Mail Mime.822 Size 1705 Date & Time Thursday, May 4, 2006 8:31 AM Options Expiration Date:
Priority:
ReplyRequested:
2077634 None Standard No
I c:\\temp\\GW}OOOO1.TMP Return Notification:
None Concealed
Subject:
No Security:
Standard Junk Mail Handling Evaluation Results Message is eligible for Junk Mail handling This message was not classified as Junk Mail Junk Mail settings when this message was delivered Junk Mail handling disabled by User Junk Mail handling disabled by Administrator Junk List is not enabled Junk Mail using personal address books is not enabled Block List is not enabled Paae 2 I" I
i