ML062120647

Email: (PA) Re-assignment of Tables 3.3.2.14-X

ML062120647
Person / Time
Site:	Pilgrim
Issue date:	05/04/2006
From:	Pavinich W - No Known Affiliation
To:	Wen P Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
%dam200612, TAC MC9669
Download: ML062120647 (3)

Text

James Davis - Re: Re-assignment of Tables 3.3.2.14-X Page 1 From: <wapavinich @comcast.net>

To: <erachp@comcast.net>, Peter Wen <pxw@nrc.gov>

Date: Thu, May 4, 2006 8:33 AM

Subject:

Re: Re-assignment of Tables 3.3.2.14-X Erach, Ithink we should include the review in sections 3.2, 3.3, and 3.4 as appropriate.

Wayne

---

----------- Original message ----------------------

From: erachp@comcast.net

> Peter and Wayne,

> As I was finishing up the review of section 3.3 Tables, I realized that PNPS has

> included all mechanical systems associated with nonsafety-related components

> affecting safety-related systems into sections 3.3, iresrective of the system

> being part of ESF or Steam and Power Conversion systems. These are shown in

> Tables 3.3.2-14-1 thru 3.3.2.-14-35.

> I discussed this with you, Peter, and we agreed that these Tables should be

> re-assigned from me to the appropriate team member, either yourself for section

> 3.4 systems and Wayne Pavinich for section 3.2 systems. None of section 3.1

> systems are involved. PNPS should have included these tables in the appropriate

> sections where the non-safety related systems belong. No wonder I had over 60%

> of line items in my scope.

> Based on our discussion, I have revised the PNPS consolidated table EXCEL

> spreadsheet accordingly and have attached it to this e-mail. Please review

> these tables similarly as you review the section 3.2 or 3.4 tables.

> We should discuss and finalize how we are going to write the Audit report and

> the SER relative to these tables. Should the appropriate table review be

> included all in section 3.3, or should we really include the review in sections

> 3.2, 3.3, and 3.4 as appropriate?

> We need to let Entergy know that the LRA should reflect systems in section 3 in

> the appropriate subsections where they belong and not lumped into one

> subsection.

Erach CC: Ram Subbaratnam <rxs2@nrc.gov>, Joe Zabel <JZabel@atlintl.com>, Mark Orr

<MPOrr@atlintl.com>, Bob Jackson <JacksonWR@msn.com>, Jim Davis <jad@nrc.gov>

I c:\temp\GWOOOO"1.TMP.. Page 1 .1 Mail Envelope Properties (4459F492.1OA:19 :24842)

Subject:

Re: Re-assignment of Tables 3.3.2.14-X Creation Date Thu, May 4, 2006 8:31 AM From: <wapavinich @comcast.net>

Created By: wapavinich @comcast.net Recipients nrc.gov TWGWPO02.HQGWDO01 PXW (Peter Wen)

RXS2 CC (Ram Subbaratnam) nrc.gov OWGWPOO1.HQGWDOO1 JAD CC (James Davis) msn.com JacksonWR CC (Bob Jackson) atlintl.com MPOrr CC (Mark Orr)

JZabel CC (Joe Zabel) comcast.net erachp Post Office Route TWGWPO02.HQGWDO01 nrc.gov OWGWPOO1 .HQGWDOO1 nrc.gov msn.com atlintl.com comcast.net Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 1705 Thursday, May 4, 2006 8:31 AM Mail Mime.822 2077634 Options Expiration Date: None Priority: Standard ReplyRequested: No

I c:\temp\GW}OOOO1.TMP Paae 2I" I i Return Notification: None Concealed

Subject:

No Security: Standard Junk Mail Handling Evaluation Results Message is eligible for Junk Mail handling This message was not classified as Junk Mail Junk Mail settings when this message was delivered Junk Mail handling disabled by User Junk Mail handling disabled by Administrator Junk List is not enabled Junk Mail using personal address books is not enabled Block List is not enabled