ML062090493

Email: (PA) PNPS Template for Not Consistent with GALL AMRs

ML062090493
Person / Time
Site:	Pilgrim
Issue date:	05/05/2006
From:	Wen P NRC/NRR/ADRO/DLR
To:	Jennifer Davis, Patel E - No Known Affiliation, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
%dam200612, TAC MC9669
Download: ML062090493 (2)

Text

James Davis - Re: PNPS Template for not consistent with GALL AMRs -Page 111 From: Peter Wen To: erachp@comcast.net; James Davis Date: Fri, May 5, 2006 8:13 AM

Subject:

Re: PNPS Template for not consistent with GALL AMRs Erach, Your template for the subject looks fine. Thank you.

Regarding the question you asked. I believe that we should still address them. The goal is to match the subsection number with the Table number. We could use a generic statement such as:

"The project team reviewed PNPS LRA Table xxx, which summarizes the results of AMR evaluations for the yyyy component groups. The results of these evaluations are all consistent with the GALL Report."

What do you think?

Peter

>>> <erachp@comcast.net> 05/04/06 8:19 PM >>>

Peter/Jim, The attached reflects our discussion this morning regarding a template for AMR audit report section 3.X.2.3 - AMRs not consistent with GALL Report or not included in the GALL Report. The format reflects what we discussed. There are no subsections assigned to those paragraphs that address "not applicable" for AEs in Table 1, and for those paragraphs that address "none-none" for AE/AMP in Table 2's.

Subsections start with section 3.X.2.3.1 for Table 3.X.2-1, 3.X.2.3.2 for Table 3.X.2-2, and so on. There may be some Table 2's where all line items may be consistent wih GALL (footnotes A-E). Should we still address these Tables with its associated sub-section number? If we do not , then the susbsection number and Table number will not match.

Let me know what you think or call me tomorrow and we can discuss any changes you may want.

Erach

ýcAtemp\GW)00001.TMP c:\temp\GW}OOO01 .TMP Page iI~

Paae 111 1

Mail Envelope Properties (445B4168.780: 20: 35420)

Subject:

Re: PNPS Template for not consistent with GALL AMRs Creation Date Fri, May 5, 2006 8:13 AM From: Peter Wen Created By: PXW@nrc.gov Recipients comcast.net erachp (erachp@comcast.net) nrc.gov OWGWPO01.HQGWDOO1 JAD (James Davis)

Post Office Route comcast.net OWGWPO01.HQGWDOO1 nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 2657 Friday, May 5, 2006 8:13 AM Options Expiration Date: None Priority: Standard ReplyRequested: No Return Notification: None Concealed

Subject:

No Security: Standard Junk Mail Handling Evaluation Results Message is not eligible for Junk Mail handling Message is from an internal sender Junk Mail settings when this message was delivered Junk Mail handling disabled by User Junk Mail handling disabled by Administrator Junk List is not enabled Junk Mail using personal address books is not enabled Block List is not enabled