Letter Sequence Other |
---|
|
Results
Other: ML060300028, ML061220630, ML061220716, ML061710422, ML061940175, ML062090293, ML062090294, ML062090300, ML062090304, ML062090305, ML062090307, ML062090309, ML062090318, ML062090319, ML062090322, ML062090324, ML062090328, ML062090333, ML062090338, ML062090380, ML062090387, ML062090388, ML062090488, ML062090490, ML062090493, ML062090496, ML062090497, ML062090498, ML062090499, ML062090546, ML062090561, ML062090563, ML062090565, ML062090567, ML062090569, ML062120406, ML062120407, ML062120408, ML062120410, ML062120412, ML062120415, ML062120477, ML062120480, ML062120491, ML062120498, ML062120543, ML062120549, ML062120625, ML062120629, ML062120631... further results
|
|
|
---|
Category:E-Mail
MONTHYEARML22335A2802022-11-0404 November 2022 11-4-2022 Email Transmitting Draft Questions Pertaining to Pilgrim ISFSI Exemption Request ML22270A0422022-09-26026 September 2022 Acknowledgement Email for Holtecs Request for Reporting Exemption with Regards to the Pilgrim ISFSI Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report (Docket No. 05000293) ML22154A1622022-05-26026 May 2022 Letter and Email from Save Our Bay/Diane Turco Regarding Irradiated Water Release from Pilgrim ML22007A2602021-12-0606 December 2021 E-mail from P. Obrien, Holtec, to A. Snyder, NRC, on Pilgrim Effluent Discharge ML21287A6192021-10-14014 October 2021 E-mail from S. Phillips, MEMA, to A. Snyder, NRC, Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station, Commonwealth of Massachusetts Consultation Response to Amendment Review for Emergency Preparedness ML21266A2512021-09-23023 September 2021 Consultation with Commonwealth of Massachusetts Regarding Proposed Amendment Application for Emergency Plan and Emergency Action Levels ML21266A2772021-09-23023 September 2021 HDI Clarification of Exemption Requested from 10 CFR 20, Appendix G, Section Iii.E ML21267A0012021-09-23023 September 2021 E-mail from A. Snyder, NRC, to A. Sterdis, Holtec, - Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station - Request for Exemption from 10 CFR 20, Appendix G, Section Iii.E Acceptance Review ML21257A3832021-09-15015 September 2021 E-mail from A. Snyder, NRC, to A. Sterdis, Holtec, - Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station - Follow-on Request Re Request for Additional Information 2 Pilgrim - License Amendment Request Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Only Emergency Pl ML21211A5912021-07-22022 July 2021 Consultation Response from Commonwealth of Massachusetts Regarding Proposed Pilgrim ISFSI Only Technical Specifications ML21211A5162021-07-22022 July 2021 Consultation Response from Commonwealth of Massachusetts Regarding Proposed Pilgrim ISFSI Only Physical Security Plan ML21200A2352021-07-13013 July 2021 Consultation Request to Commonwealth of Massachusetts Regarding Proposed Pilgrim ISFSI Only Technical Specifications ML21200A1522021-07-13013 July 2021 Consultation Request to Commonwealth of Massachusetts Regarding Proposed Pilgrim Isfi Only Physical Security Plan ML21176A1842021-06-25025 June 2021 Email from HDI Regarding Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station Training ML21180A0582021-06-17017 June 2021 Email from Region I Regarding Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station Inspection - EA-13-132 ML21097A0402021-04-0606 April 2021 E-Mail Consult with Commonwealth of Mass Re - Amendment Application - Physical Security Plan for the Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station L-20-092, Email Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station-Exemption from Annual Force-On-Force Exercise Requirements of 10 CFR Part 73, Appendix B,2020-12-10010 December 2020 Email Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station-Exemption from Annual Force-On-Force Exercise Requirements of 10 CFR Part 73, Appendix B, L-20-096, Supplemental Information to Support Physical Security Plan Revision and License Amendment Request to Incorporate Alternate Measures - Holtec Email Dated December 10, 20102020-12-10010 December 2020 Supplemental Information to Support Physical Security Plan Revision and License Amendment Request to Incorporate Alternate Measures - Holtec Email Dated December 10, 2010 ML20328A2982020-11-16016 November 2020 Response from Commonwealth of Massachusetts on No Significant Hazard for Pilgrim ISFSI Amendment to Address ISFSI II Dated November 16, 2020 ML20297A2372020-10-22022 October 2020 Request for Additional Information - HDI Fleet Decommissioning Quality Assurance Program ML20266G4032020-09-22022 September 2020 Acceptance Review Email - Request for Approval of HDI Fleet Decommissioning Quality Assurance Program, Revision 0 ML20163A6802020-06-11011 June 2020 Confirmation of the Scope of the Requested Regulatory Relief for Pilgrim Security Qualifications ML20280A1912020-04-17017 April 2020 Request for Additional Information- Clarifying Information for Pilgrim ISFSI Physical Security Amendment Application ML20269A3542020-03-0505 March 2020 CFR 26.717 Reports 2019 Transmittal Email ML19336A0302019-11-27027 November 2019 OEDO-15-00479 - Re 2.206 Petition Regarding Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station'S Current Licensing Basis for Flooding ML19336A0332019-11-26026 November 2019 OEDO-15-00479 - E-mail to Petitioner - 2.206 Petition Regarding Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station'S Current Licensing Basis for Flooding (CAC No. MF6460; EPID L-2015-CRS-0002)- Issuance of Final Director'S Decision ML19331A1952019-11-21021 November 2019 NRR E-mail Capture - (External_Sender) Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station - Commonwealth Consultation Response - Amendment Regarding Site Emergency Plan and Emergency Action Level Scheme ML19331A1732019-11-12012 November 2019 NRR E-mail Capture - Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station -Consult with Commonwealth - Amendment Regarding Cyber Security Plan ML19331A1642019-11-0505 November 2019 NRR E-mail Capture - Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station -Consult with Commonwealth - Amendment Regarding Site Emergency Plan and Emergency Action Level Scheme ML19331A1792019-11-0505 November 2019 NRR E-mail Capture - Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station - EA and Fonsi for Pilgrim Emergency Planning Exemption CY-19-007, LTR-19-0441 Henrietta Cosentino, E-mail SECY-19-0078 Request by Entergy Nuclear Operations Inc. for Exemptions from Certain Emergency Planning Requirements for the Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station2019-11-0404 November 2019 LTR-19-0441 Henrietta Cosentino, E-mail SECY-19-0078 Request by Entergy Nuclear Operations Inc. for Exemptions from Certain Emergency Planning Requirements for the Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station ML19275H1962019-09-24024 September 2019 NRR E-mail Capture - Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station - Consult with Commonwealth - Amendment Regarding Permanently Defueled Technical Specifications (PDTS) ML19239A0372019-08-26026 August 2019 E-mail from Entergy Dated August 26, 2019, Notification of Pilgrim License Transfer ML19239A0262019-08-23023 August 2019 LTR-19-0330 Janet Azarovitz, E-mail a Plea for More Time and Reasonable Discussion Including the Citizens of the Commonwealth in the Sale of the Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station ML19234A2072019-08-20020 August 2019 LTR-19-0328 Lawrence Delafield, President, Six Ponds Improv Assoc., Plymouth, Ma, Ltr Requests NRC to Postpone Consideration of Transferring the Licenses for the Pilgrim Nuclear Power Until the NRC Has Answered Concerns by Pilgrim Watch, Se ML19232A4032019-08-20020 August 2019 LTR-19-0322 Diane Turco, Director, Cape Downwinders, Massachusetts, Letter/E-mail Requests Suspension of the Pilgrim License Transfer from Entergy to Holtec Until the Adjudicatory Hearing Is Held and Raised Contentions Are Resolved ML19308A9942019-08-19019 August 2019 Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. Confirmatory Order Rescission Supplemental Information ML19226A3912019-08-14014 August 2019 NRR E-mail Capture - Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station - EA and Fonsi for Pilgrim Decommissioning Trust Fund Exemption (Holtec) ML19226A3962019-08-14014 August 2019 NRR E-mail Capture - Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station -Consult with Commonwealth - Conforming Amendment in Support of Pilgrim License Transfer Application ML19226A1212019-08-13013 August 2019 OEDO-15-00479-2.206 Petition Regarding Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station'S Current Licensing Basis for Flooding - Status (CAC No. MF6460; EPID L-2015-CRS-0002) ML19227A1032019-08-0707 August 2019 NRR E-mail Capture - Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station - Draft Wording for Potential Condition of License Transfer Order ML19207B3662019-07-26026 July 2019 NRR E-mail Capture - Pilgrim - RAI Direct and Indirect Transfer of Lic.; Conforming Lic. Amend.; Req. for Exemption 10 CFR 50.82(A)(8)(I)(A) for Holtec Decom. International, Llc ML19176A3452019-06-25025 June 2019 2.206 Petition Regarding Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station'S Current Licensing Basis for Flooding - Information (OEDO-15-00479) (CAC No. MF6460; EPID L-2015-CRS-0002) ML19154A0652019-06-0303 June 2019 NRR E-mail Capture - Pilgrim - Permanent Cessation of Power Operations ML19154A5242019-06-0303 June 2019 NRR E-mail Capture - RAI - Pilgrim Post-Decommissioning Technical Specifications (PDTS) License Amendment Request (LAR) ML19161A2122019-05-20020 May 2019 NRR E-mail Capture - Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station - Acceptance of License Amendment Request to Remove Cyber Security Plan Requirements ML19123A0332019-05-0101 May 2019 NRR E-mail Capture - Logbook Entry: 05/01/2019 Endangered Species Report Regarding a Confirmed Sighting of North Atlantic Right Whale(S) (Balaena Glacialis) ML19122A4912019-04-29029 April 2019 NRR E-mail Capture - Logbook Entry: 04/29/2019 Regarding the Confirmed Sighting of Ten North Atlantic Right Whales (Balaena Glacialis) ML19108A2372019-04-18018 April 2019 NRR E-mail Capture - Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station - Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action, Proposed Exemptions from 10 CFR 50.54(w)(1) - On-Site Property Damage Insurance ML19108A2362019-04-18018 April 2019 NRR E-mail Capture - Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station - Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action, Proposed Exemptions from 10 CFR 140.11(a)(4) - Primary and Secondary Liability Insurance 2022-09-26
[Table view] |
Text
I. iýmes Davis - PNPSs TLAA Section 4.6 Page 11!
From: Dan Hoang To: James Medoff Date: 07/05/2006 12:57:41 PM
Subject:
PNPS's TLAA Section 4.6 Jim, For your review and comments Thanks, Dan CC: James Davis; Peter Wen
I c-3Mernp\GW)OOO0l .TMP - ...
Page II ae1f Mail Envelope Properties (44ABEF7C.54D : 17 : 35826)
Subject:
PNPS's TLAA Section 4.6 Creation Date 07/05/2006 12:57:32 PM From: Dan Hoang Created By: DVH@nrc.gov Recipients nrc.gov OWGWPOO3.HQGWDOO1 JAD CC (James Davis) nrc.gov TWGWPOO1.HQGWDOO1 JXM (James Medoff) nrc.gov TWGWPOO4.HQGWDO01 PXW CC (Peter Wen)
Post Office Route OWGWPO03.HQGWDO01 nrc.gov TWGWPO01.HQGWDO01 nrc.gov TWGWPO04.HQGWDO01 nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 503 07/05/2006 12:57:32 PM 4.6 TLAA for PNPS.wpd 11575 07/05/2006 9:22:22 AM Options Expiration Date: None Priority: Standard ReplyRequested: No Return Notification: None Concealed
Subject:
No Security: Standard Junk Mail Handling Evaluation Results Message is not eligible for Junk Mail handling Message is from an internal sender Junk Mail settings when this message was delivered
Junk M hd ___ dad\UGW eTMf Page2 Junk Mail handling disabled by User Junk Mail handling disabled by Administrator Junk List is not enabled Junk Mail using personal address books is not enabled Block list is not enabled
MMaris-bavis -4.6 TLAAfor PNP8.w'p'd Pg page I I 4.6 Containment Liner Plate, Metal Containment, and Penetration fatigue Analysis 4.6.1 Fatigue of Primary Containment In the LRA, the applicant indicated that the PNPS containment was analyzed as part of the Mark I containment long term program (Reference 4.6-1) using the methods and assumptions consistent with NUREG-0661.
The Mark I Containment Long-Term Program analyzed the torus and attached piping systems for fatigue due to mechanical loadings as well as thermal and anchor motion. This analysis was based on assumptions of the number of SRV actuations, operating basis earthquakes, and accident conditions during the life of the plant.
The analysis considered all BWR plants which utilized the mark I containment design. The analysis concluded that for all plants and piping systems considered, the fatigue usage factor for an assumed 40-year plant life was less than 0.5. Extending plant life by an additional 20 years would produce a usage factor below 0.75. Since less than 1.0, the fatigue criteria are satisfied. This TLAA has been projected through the period of extended operation in accordance with 10 CFR 54.21 (c)(1)(ii).
4.6.1.1 Staff Evaluation During an audit and review, the staff requested that the applicant to provide a statement indicating that the estimate of the total number of 60-year SRV actuations used in the design fatigue analysis remains valid and conservative, based on the actual SRV actuations counted through 2005. In it response, the applicant stated that Per the MPR 751, all domestic mark I BWRs appear to meet MPR 751 for both current operating and license renewal terms. It should be noted that PNPS's SRV operation has been very low. PNPS has tracked SRV actuations from 1992 to 2005, a total of 14 actuations have been recorded on valve A, and 13 each on valve B, C, and D. Using the 14 actuations in this thirteen year period, the project actuations for the rest of 60 years are 31 lifts. The number of lifts in the first 21 years of the plant life (1972 -
1993) were not recorded. These lifts were more frequent in the early years, so PNPS estimated these 21 years at 5 times the recorded rate. This yield 120 lifts in the first 20 years. Combining the early period, the recorded period, and the projected period, there will be an estimated 165 lifts in 60 years.
PNPS plant specific analysis (Teledyne Engineering Services [TES] document TR-5310-2) states that the SRV penetrations are qualified for 7500 cycles of maximum load. Based on this, the project CUF for 60 years is calculated as 0.022.
During an audit and review, the staff also requested the applicant to provide a Fatigue Analysis of the SRV discharge piping and Fatigue Analysis of other attached piping. In it responded, the applicant indicated that the TES document TR-5310-2 documents stress evaluations for the SRV for various load combinations, but does not include a fatigue analysis (the fatigue analysis of the SRV piping along with all the other Torus Attached Piping [TAP]). TAP is bounded by MPR-751, the GE Mark I Containment Program. MPR-751 concluded that for all plants and piping systems considered, in all cases the fatigue usage factors for an assumed 40-year plant life was less than 0.5. In worse case scenario, extending plant life for an additional 20 years would produce usage factors below 0.75. Since this is less than 1.0, the fatigue criteria are satisfied. The MPR-751 generic fatigue analysis is thus protected for the period of extended
Dvs-- 4.6 Davis Ija 6 Jae .6TA fo PNPS TLAA for P S.w~wDd Laa - Paae 22--
operation in accordance with 10 CFR 54.21 (c)(1)(ii).
A PNPS plant-specific analysis addresses the SRV discharge piping and its supports, as well as the main vent penetration through which the SRV discharge enter the torus. This analysis states that the SRV penetrations are qualified for 7500 cycles of maximum load while the SRV are expected to see less than 50 cycles at maximum load and less than 4500 cycle at partial load. The report concludes Since the 7500 cycles of maximum load bound both of these by such a large margin and since no other significant loads are imposed on the line, the penetration was assumed acceptable for fatigue without further evaluation." Increasing the 40 years cycles by 1.5 for the period of extended operation would still be less than the 7500 maximum load cycle permitted. The fatigue analysis for torus penetrations thus remains valid for the period of extended operation in accordance with 10 CFR 54.21 (c)(1)(1).
The PNPS plant specific analysis (TR-5310-2) references the generic GE Mark I Containment Program for other torus attached piping. The results of the generic GE Mark I Containment Program (based on 40 years of operation) were that 92% of the TAP would have cumulative usage factors of less than 0.3 and that 100% would have usage factors less than 0.5.
Conservatively multiplying the CUFs by 1.5 shows that for 60 years of operation, 92% of the TAP would have CUFs below 0.45, and 100% would have CUFs below 0.75. These calculations have thus been projected through the period of extended operation in accordance with 10 CFR 54.21 (c)(1)(ii). The staff reviewed the applicant's response and found it acceptable because it conforms with nuclear industry practice.
4.6.2 References 4.6-1 Technical Report MPR-751, Mark I Containment Program Augmented Class 2/3 Fatigue Evaluation Method and results for Typical Torus Attached and SRV Piping Systems, November 1982.
4.6.4 UFSAR Supplement The applicant provided a UFSAR supplement summary description of its TLAA evaluation of Fatigue of Primary Containment, Attached Piping, and Components Section A.2.2.4. On the basis of it review of the UFSAR supplement. The staff found that the summary description of the applicant's actions to address the Fatigue of Primary Containment, Attached Piping, and Components is adequate, because it reflects the information provided in the LRA 4.6.5 Conclusion On the basis of its review, as discussed above, the staff concluded that the applicant has demonstrated, pursuant to 10 CFR 54.21 (c)(1)(ii), that for the Containment Liner Plate, Metal Containment, and Penetrations fatigue analyses TLAA, the analyses have been projected to the end of period of extended operation. The staff also concluded that the UFSAR supplement contains an appropriate summary description of Fatigue of Primary Containment, Attached Piping, and Components TLAA evaluation for the period of extended operation, as required by 10 CFR 54.21(d).
James..Davis-..4. 6 TLAA for PNPS.age3