ML062090490
| ML062090490 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Pilgrim |
| Issue date: | 05/05/2006 |
| From: | Patel E - No Known Affiliation |
| To: | Jackson W, Pavinich W - No Known Affiliation, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| TAC MC9669 | |
| Download: ML062090490 (3) | |
Text
James Davis - Re: Bolting Integrity Program Page 111 James Davis - Re: Bolting Integrity Program Page 1 ii From:
<erachp@comcast.net>
To:
<wapavinich@comcast.net>, Bob Jackson <JacksonWR@msn.com>
Date:
Fri, May 5, 2006 1:07 PM
Subject:
Re: Bolting Integrity Program
- Wayne, PNPS does not have a bolting program. However, I believe NRC is requesting them to submit one. I do not know where they are with this. By copy of this maybe Peter or Jim can advise.
For SS bolting, there will not be LOM due to corrosion, however, for loss of pre-load, if in your experience or there is a past precedent where NRC asked an RAI on this subject, then we will have to address it.
Erach
- ------------- Original message --------------
From: wapavinich @comcast.net
> I need a little help here. PNPS says that the Bolting Integrity Program is not
" applicable. Bolting AEs are handle through other programs. However, stainless
" steel bolting in ESF systems are assigned no AEs although loss of preload is
" plausible. Will PNPS be required to have a bolting integrity program? Should
" loss of preload be captured for stainless steel bolting?
> Wayne CC:
Jim Davis <jad@nrc.gov>, Peter Wen <pxw@nrc.gov>
CMEterlp\\GW}OOOOI.TMP 1,..
Mail Envelope Properties (445B863F.D41 : 14 :60737)
Page1
Subject:
Creation Date From:
Created By:
Re: Bolting Integrity Program Fri, May 5, 2006 1:06 PM
<erachp @comcast.net>
erachp@comcast.net Recipients nrc.gov OWGWPO01.HQGWDO01 JAD CC (James Davis) nrc.gov TWGWPO02.HQGWDO01 PXW CC (Peter Wen) msn.com JacksonWR (Bob Jackson) comcast.net wapavinich Post Office OWGWPO01.HQGWDO01 TWGWPO02.HQGWDO01 Route nrc.gov nrc.gov msn.com comcast.net Files MESSAGE TEXT.htm Mime.822 Options Expiration Date:
Priority:
ReplyRequested:
Return Notification:
Concealed
Subject:
Security:
Size 887 1202 3647 Date & Time Friday, May 5,2006 1:06 PM None Standard No None No Standard Junk Mail Handling Evaluation Results
cýtemp\\GWIOOO1.TMP Page.2?
Message is eligible for Junk Mail handling This message was not classified as Junk Mail Junk Mail settings when this message was delivered Junk Mail handling disabled by User Junk Mail handling disabled by Administrator Junk List is not enabled Junk Mail using personal address books is not enabled Block List is not enabled