ML20151C914: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 15: Line 15:
| page count = 2
| page count = 2
}}
}}
See also: [[see also::IR 07100130/2012011]]


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:#
{{#Wiki_filter:#
l        #            o                            UNITED STATES
l        #            o                            UNITED STATES
   ,  8            ^ ,'n NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION t,              .
'
t                    r' ASHING Tc N, C. C, 20655 s                1 4
   ,  8            ^ ,'n
4        9.....,
                                        NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
1988 APR@
      t,              .
Docket Nos. 50-369 50-370 Mr. Warren H. Owen, Executive Vice President Engineering, Construction and Production Group Duke Power Company Post Office Box 33189 Charlotte, North Carolina 28242
                        t                    r' ASHING Tc N, C. C, 20655
      s                1
          4
  4        9.....,
                                                            1988
                                                  APR@
    Docket Nos. 50-369
                    50-370
            Mr. Warren H. Owen, Executive Vice President
            Engineering, Construction and
              Production Group
            Duke Power Company
            Post Office Box 33189
            Charlotte, North Carolina 28242
          Dear Mr. Owen:
          SUBJECT:
                          DIAGNOSTIC EVALUATION TEAM REPORT FOR MCGUIRE NUCLEAR STATION
          This letter forwards the Diagnostic Evaluation Team Report for the McGuire
          Nuclear Station. The evaluation was conducted by a team of NRC headquarters
          and regional evaluators with team leadership and support provided by the Office
          for Analysis and Evaluation of Operational Data over the period November 30
          to December 11, 1987 and January 4-8, 1988. As you are aware, this is a
          nm NRC assessment tool that is intended to provide an independent assessment
*          of licensee performance, and as such, its principal focus is on safety
          perfomance and not compliance with regulatory requirements.                Following the
          conclusion of the onsite evaluation, the findings were discussed at an exit
          meeting with you and other company executives and managers on January 22, 1988.
          The HRC effort involved an assessment of overall plant operation and the Duke
          Power Company major programs for supporting safe plant operation at the McGuire
          Nuclear Station. Particular attention was directed in the areas of engine.ering
          support, operations, maintenance, testing, quality prograrns, management                        '
        oversight and organization culture and climate.
        The team concluded that the overall performance of McGuire was a solid SALP
        Category 2 with an improving trend. Although the team observed a number of
        strengths in Duke's organization and programs which contributed to the
          improving trend, the team also identified some organizational and programatic
        weaknesses, which could slow down the improvement efforts.                Section 2 of the
        enclosed report provides the team evaluation results which include: (1) major
        findings and conclusions, (2) specific findings and conclusions, and (3) root
        cause determinations. Section 3 of the report provides the detailed evaluation
        findings. Some of these items may be potential enforcement findings. Any
        enforcement actions will be identified by our Region II office.
                                                                                                        .
        This report is provided for your evaluation and use in fomulating and
        implementing appropriate action in response to the team findings. I request
,
                8804130260 003400
                PDR      ADOCK 03000369
                g                    PDR
:
                                . -.                                      ,_
                                                                              - - _ .      -        , -


==Dear Mr. Owen:==
                                                                                                          - _-__ __--_
 
          Mr. Warren H. Owen                             -2-                          gpg 8 1989
==SUBJECT:==
.
 
          that you evaluate the report and, that as soon as appropriate, provide my office
DIAGNOSTIC EVALUATION TEAM REPORT FOR MCGUIRE NUCLEAR STATION This letter forwards the Diagnostic Evaluation Team Report for the McGuire Nuclear Station. The evaluation was conducted by a team of NRC headquarters and regional evaluators with team leadership and support provided by the Office for Analysis and Evaluation of Operational Data over the period November 30 to December 11, 1987 and January 4-8, 1988. As you are aware, this is a nm NRC assessment tool that is intended to provide an independent assessment
'
* of licensee performance, and as such, its principal focus is on safety perfomance and not compliance with regulatory requirements.                Following the conclusion of the onsite evaluation, the findings were discussed at an exit meeting with you and other company executives and managers on January 22, 1988.
          a written response. Since I have directed the NRC staff to review and followup                                      .
The HRC effort involved an assessment of overall plant operation and the Duke Power Company major programs for supporting safe plant operation at the McGuire Nuclear Station. Particular attention was directed in the areas of engine.ering support, operations, maintenance, testing, quality prograrns, management                        '
          the more detailed findings of the evaluation, your response to the specific                                        l
oversight and organization culture and climate.
          evaluation results delineated in Section 2 of the report, would greatly facili.                                    '
The team concluded that the overall performance of McGuire was a solid SALP Category 2 with an improving trend. Although the team observed a number of strengths in Duke's organization and programs which contributed to the improving trend, the team also identified some organizational and programatic weaknesses, which could slow down the improvement efforts.                Section 2 of the enclosed report provides the team evaluation results which include: (1) major findings and conclusions, (2) specific findings and conclusions, and (3) root cause determinations. Section 3 of the report provides the detailed evaluation findings. Some of these items may be potential enforcement findings. Any enforcement actions will be identified by our Region II office.
          tate that effort.
This report is provided for your evaluation and use in fomulating and implementing appropriate action in response to the team findings. I request 8804130260 003400 PDR      ADOCK 03000369 g                    PDR
          In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790(a), a copy of this letter and the enclosure
 
          will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room.
Mr. Warren H. Owen                                                       gpg 8 1989 that you evaluate the report and, that as soon as appropriate, provide my office a written response. Since I have directed the NRC staff to review and followup                                      .
          Should you have any questions concerning this evaluation, we would be pleased
the more detailed findings of the evaluation, your response to the specific                                        l evaluation results delineated in Section 2 of the report, would greatly facili.                                    '
          to discuss them with you.
tate that effort.
                                                              Sincerely.
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790(a), a copy of this letter and the enclosure will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room.
                                                              Origiral signed b
Should you have any questions concerning this evaluation, we would be pleased to discuss them with you.
                                                            Mt9I 0t e11o,, y
Sincerely.
                                                              Victor Stello, Jr.
Origiral signed b Mt9I 0t e11o,, y Victor Stello, Jr.
                                                              Executive Director for Operations
Executive Director for Operations
          Enclosure: Diagnostic Evaluation
 
            Team Report for McGuire Nuclear
==Enclosure:==
            Station
Diagnostic Evaluation Team Report for McGuire Nuclear Station Distribution (w/ enc 1) x DCS -
          Distribution (w/ enc 1)
PDR                                                                                                                  ,
        x DCS -
LPDR l
          PDR                                                                                                                  ,
AE00'/F R
          LPDR
Distribution (w/o encl)                                                                                              :
                                                                                                                              l
ELJordan                      CJHeltemes                  ED0 r/f w/o encl.                                        ;
          AE00'/F
DOA R/F                        Rl,Spes sa rd DEIIB R/F                      SDRubin HBa11ey                        RPerch                                                                                l RFreeman                      RLloyd AHowell                        DAllisen                                                '
                R
JTaylor                        JJohnson                                                                              I WMiroskoski                    TEMurley                                                                              i ABDavis, RIII                  RMartin, RIY JMartin, RV                    JNGrace, RII RTRussell, RI                                                                              ,                        i
          Distribution (w/o encl)                                                                                              :
* SEE PREVIOUS CONCURRENCE FC  :DOA:DEIIB      :DOA:DEIIB        :DOA:DEIIB      :AEOD:DOA      :AEOD        :AEOD I/
          ELJordan                      CJHeltemes                  ED0 r/f w/o encl.                                        ;
p':EDC
          DOA R/F                        Rl,Spes sa rd
          DEIIB R/F                      SDRubin
          HBa11ey                        RPerch                                                                                l
          RFreeman                      RLloyd
          AHowell                        DAllisen                                                '
          JTaylor                        JJohnson                                                                              I
          WMiroskoski                    TEMurley                                                                              i
          ABDavis, RIII                  RMartin, RIY
                                                                                                        '
          JMartin, RV                    JNGrace, RII
          RTRussell, RI                                                                              ,                        i
                                                                                                                                '
                                          * SEE PREVIOUS CONCURRENCE
FC  :DOA:DEIIB      :DOA:DEIIB        :DOA:DEIIB      :AEOD:DOA      :AEOD        :AEOD
                                                                                            I/
                                                                                            p':EDC
....:............:............:............:............:............:............:....'..\.....                            -
....:............:............:............:............:............:............:....'..\.....                            -
AME :RPerch:cg* :hBailey*              :SDRubin*      :RLSpessard* :CJHeltemes* :ELJordan*      :VStello ATE :02/ /88        :02/ /88          :02/ /88        :02/ /88      :02/ /88      :02/ /88    :0 h /88 w- -
AME :RPerch:cg* :hBailey*              :SDRubin*      :RLSpessard* :CJHeltemes* :ELJordan*      :VStello
rw ''                                                  s--      a}}
....:............:............:............:............:............:............:...........
ATE :02/ /88        :02/ /88          :02/ /88        :02/ /88      :02/ /88      :02/ /88    :0 h /88
                                - ' '
                                                                                                                      w- -
                        rw ''                                                  s--      a
}}

Latest revision as of 14:44, 9 September 2023

Forwards Diagnostic Evaluation Rept 2 of Evaluation Conducted Onsite on 871130-1211.Overall Performance of Plant Was Solid SALP Category 2 W/Improving Trend.Evaluation of Rept Requested
ML20151C914
Person / Time
Site: McGuire  Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 04/08/1988
From: Stello V
NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR OPERATIONS (EDO)
To: Owen W
DUKE POWER CO.
Shared Package
ML20151C916 List:
References
NUDOCS 8804130260
Download: ML20151C914 (2)
v • d • e


See also: IR 07100130/2012011

Text

l # o UNITED STATES

'

, 8 ^ ,'n

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

t, .

t r' ASHING Tc N, C. C, 20655

s 1

4

4 9.....,

1988

APR@

Docket Nos. 50-369

50-370

Mr. Warren H. Owen, Executive Vice President

Engineering, Construction and

Production Group

Duke Power Company

Post Office Box 33189

Charlotte, North Carolina 28242

Dear Mr. Owen:

SUBJECT:

DIAGNOSTIC EVALUATION TEAM REPORT FOR MCGUIRE NUCLEAR STATION

This letter forwards the Diagnostic Evaluation Team Report for the McGuire

Nuclear Station. The evaluation was conducted by a team of NRC headquarters

and regional evaluators with team leadership and support provided by the Office

for Analysis and Evaluation of Operational Data over the period November 30

to December 11, 1987 and January 4-8, 1988. As you are aware, this is a

nm NRC assessment tool that is intended to provide an independent assessment

  • of licensee performance, and as such, its principal focus is on safety

perfomance and not compliance with regulatory requirements. Following the

conclusion of the onsite evaluation, the findings were discussed at an exit

meeting with you and other company executives and managers on January 22, 1988.

The HRC effort involved an assessment of overall plant operation and the Duke

Power Company major programs for supporting safe plant operation at the McGuire

Nuclear Station. Particular attention was directed in the areas of engine.ering

support, operations, maintenance, testing, quality prograrns, management '

oversight and organization culture and climate.

The team concluded that the overall performance of McGuire was a solid SALP

Category 2 with an improving trend. Although the team observed a number of

strengths in Duke's organization and programs which contributed to the

improving trend, the team also identified some organizational and programatic

weaknesses, which could slow down the improvement efforts. Section 2 of the

enclosed report provides the team evaluation results which include: (1) major

findings and conclusions, (2) specific findings and conclusions, and (3) root

cause determinations. Section 3 of the report provides the detailed evaluation

findings. Some of these items may be potential enforcement findings. Any

enforcement actions will be identified by our Region II office.

.

This report is provided for your evaluation and use in fomulating and

implementing appropriate action in response to the team findings. I request

,

8804130260 003400

PDR ADOCK 03000369

g PDR

. -. ,_

- - _ . - , -

- _-__ __--_

Mr. Warren H. Owen -2- gpg 8 1989

.

that you evaluate the report and, that as soon as appropriate, provide my office

'

a written response. Since I have directed the NRC staff to review and followup .

the more detailed findings of the evaluation, your response to the specific l

evaluation results delineated in Section 2 of the report, would greatly facili. '

tate that effort.

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790(a), a copy of this letter and the enclosure

will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room.

Should you have any questions concerning this evaluation, we would be pleased

to discuss them with you.

Sincerely.

Origiral signed b

Mt9I 0t e11o,, y

Victor Stello, Jr.

Executive Director for Operations

Enclosure: Diagnostic Evaluation

Team Report for McGuire Nuclear

Station

Distribution (w/ enc 1)

x DCS -

PDR ,

LPDR

l

AE00'/F

R

Distribution (w/o encl)  :

ELJordan CJHeltemes ED0 r/f w/o encl.  ;

DOA R/F Rl,Spes sa rd

DEIIB R/F SDRubin

HBa11ey RPerch l

RFreeman RLloyd

AHowell DAllisen '

JTaylor JJohnson I

WMiroskoski TEMurley i

ABDavis, RIII RMartin, RIY

'

JMartin, RV JNGrace, RII

RTRussell, RI , i

'

  • SEE PREVIOUS CONCURRENCE

FC :DOA:DEIIB :DOA:DEIIB :DOA:DEIIB :AEOD:DOA :AEOD :AEOD

I/

p':EDC

....:............:............:............:............:............:............:....'..\..... -

AME :RPerch:cg* :hBailey* :SDRubin* :RLSpessard* :CJHeltemes* :ELJordan* :VStello

....:............:............:............:............:............:............:...........

ATE :02/ /88 :02/ /88 :02/ /88 :02/ /88 :02/ /88 :02/ /88 :0 h /88

- ' '

w- -

rw s-- a

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20151C914&oldid=3614582"