ML062130061: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:I James Davis -Additional AMR questions Paae 1 1 From: To: Date:  
{{#Wiki_filter:I James Davis - Additional AMR questions                         Paae 1 1 From:           <wapavinich @comcast.net>
To:             Jim Davis <jad@nrc.gov>
Date:           07/06/2006 3:24:03 PM


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
<wapavinich
Additional AMR questions Jim, Attached are two additional AMR questions.
@ comcast.net>
Wayne CC:               Erach Patel <erachp@comcast.net>
Jim Davis <jad@nrc.gov>
 
07/06/2006 3:24:03 PM Additional AMR questions Jim, Attached are two additional AMR questions.
c:\tep\GW0000.TMPPage                                               1 Mail Envelope Properties       (44AD633C.724: 19 : 38692)
Wayne CC: Erach Patel <erachp@comcast.net>
c:\tep\GW0000.TMPPage 1 Mail Envelope Properties (44AD633C.724:
19 : 38692)


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Creation Date From: Created By: Additional AMR questions 07/06/2006 3:23:10 PM<wapavinich  
Additional AMR questions Creation Date            07/06/2006 3:23:10 PM From:                    <wapavinich @comcast.net>
@comcast.net>
Created By:              wapavinich @comcast.net Recipients nrc.gov OWGWPOO3.HQGWDO01 JAD (James Davis) comcast.net erachp CC (Erach Patel)
wapavinich  
Post Office                                                             Route OWGWPOO3.HQGWDO01                                                       nrc.gov comcast.net Files                           Size                Date & Time MESSAGE                         59                  07/06/2006 3:23:10 PM Additional AMR questions.wpd                         3534 Mime.822                         6506 Options Expiration Date:                 None Priority:                       Standard ReplyRequested:                 No Return Notification:             None Concealed  
@comcast.net Recipients nrc.gov OWGWPOO3.HQGWDO01 JAD (James Davis)comcast.net erachp CC (Erach Patel)Post Office OWGWPOO3.HQGWDO01 Files MESSAGE Additional AMR questions.wpd Mime.822 Options Expiration Date: Priority: ReplyRequested:
Return Notification:
Concealed  


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Security: Route nrc.gov comcast.net Size 59 Date & Time 07/06/2006 3:23:10 PM 3534 6506 None Standard No None ,;o Standard Junk Mail Handling Evaluation Results Message is eligible for Junk Mail handling This message was not classified as Junk Mail Junk Mail settings when this message was delivered Junk Mail handling disabled by User Junk Mail handling disabled by Administrator Junk List is not enabled Junk Mail using personal address books is not enabled Block List is not enabled
              ,;o Security:                        Standard Junk Mail Handling Evaluation Results Message is eligible for Junk Mail handling This message was not classified as Junk Mail Junk Mail settings when this message was delivered Junk Mail handling disabled by User Junk Mail handling disabled by Administrator Junk List is not enabled Junk Mail using personal address books is not enabled Block List is not enabled
:.\temp\GW}.00002.TMP.Page2 James Davis -Additional AMR questions.w&#xfd;pd Page 1 Additional AMR questions 1) The piping of the Reactor Core Isolation Cooling System is subject to flow accelerated corrosion.
:.\temp\GW}.00002.TMP.Page2 James Davis - Additional AMR questions.w&#xfd;pd                                                                     Page 1 Additional AMR questions
The PNPS LRA Table 3.2.1-19 -ESF and Table 3.2.1 credit the plant-specific Periodic Surveillance and Preventive Maintenance Program for the management of wall thinning.
: 1)     The piping of the Reactor Core Isolation Cooling System is subject to flow accelerated corrosion. The PNPS LRA Table 3.2.1 ESF and Table 3.2.1 credit the plant-specific Periodic Surveillance and Preventive Maintenance Program for the management of wall thinning. The GALL report recommends using the Flow-Accelerated Corrosion Program, XI.M17, to manage wall thinning. The Periodic Surveillance and Preventive Maintenance Program provides for inspection for wall thinning every 5 years but no Monitoring and Trending activities to predict areas of high wall thinning rates or for trending of thinning as does XI.M 17. Please provide justification for not providing for monitoring a trending of wall thinning for RCIC piping.
The GALL report recommends using the Flow-Accelerated Corrosion Program, XI.M17, to manage wall thinning.
: 2)     In table 3.2.1 Item 18 of the PNPS LRA, it is stated that none of the ESF system components are not within the scope of the BWR Stress Corrosion Cracking Program.
The Periodic Surveillance and Preventive Maintenance Program provides for inspection for wall thinning every 5 years but no Monitoring and Trending activities to predict areas of high wall thinning rates or for trending of thinning as does XI.M 17. Please provide justification for not providing for monitoring a trending of wall thinning for RCIC piping.2) In table 3.2.1 Item 18 of the PNPS LRA, it is stated that none of the ESF system components are not within the scope of the BWR Stress Corrosion Cracking Program.Please provide the details that justify this statement.}}
Please provide the details that justify this statement.}}

Revision as of 15:42, 23 November 2019

2006/07/06-Email: (PA) Additional AMR Questions
ML062130061
Person / Time
Site: Pilgrim
Issue date: 07/06/2006
From: Pavinich W
- No Known Affiliation
To: Jennifer Davis
Division of Regulatory Improvement Programs
References
%dam200612, TAC MC9669
Download: ML062130061 (4)


Text

I James Davis - Additional AMR questions Paae 1 1 From: <wapavinich @comcast.net>

To: Jim Davis <jad@nrc.gov>

Date: 07/06/2006 3:24:03 PM

Subject:

Additional AMR questions Jim, Attached are two additional AMR questions.

Wayne CC: Erach Patel <erachp@comcast.net>

c:\tep\GW0000.TMPPage 1 Mail Envelope Properties (44AD633C.724: 19 : 38692)

Subject:

Additional AMR questions Creation Date 07/06/2006 3:23:10 PM From: <wapavinich @comcast.net>

Created By: wapavinich @comcast.net Recipients nrc.gov OWGWPOO3.HQGWDO01 JAD (James Davis) comcast.net erachp CC (Erach Patel)

Post Office Route OWGWPOO3.HQGWDO01 nrc.gov comcast.net Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 59 07/06/2006 3:23:10 PM Additional AMR questions.wpd 3534 Mime.822 6506 Options Expiration Date: None Priority: Standard ReplyRequested: No Return Notification: None Concealed

Subject:

,;o Security: Standard Junk Mail Handling Evaluation Results Message is eligible for Junk Mail handling This message was not classified as Junk Mail Junk Mail settings when this message was delivered Junk Mail handling disabled by User Junk Mail handling disabled by Administrator Junk List is not enabled Junk Mail using personal address books is not enabled Block List is not enabled

.\temp\GW}.00002.TMP.Page2 James Davis - Additional AMR questions.wýpd Page 1 Additional AMR questions
1) The piping of the Reactor Core Isolation Cooling System is subject to flow accelerated corrosion. The PNPS LRA Table 3.2.1 ESF and Table 3.2.1 credit the plant-specific Periodic Surveillance and Preventive Maintenance Program for the management of wall thinning. The GALL report recommends using the Flow-Accelerated Corrosion Program, XI.M17, to manage wall thinning. The Periodic Surveillance and Preventive Maintenance Program provides for inspection for wall thinning every 5 years but no Monitoring and Trending activities to predict areas of high wall thinning rates or for trending of thinning as does XI.M 17. Please provide justification for not providing for monitoring a trending of wall thinning for RCIC piping.
2) In table 3.2.1 Item 18 of the PNPS LRA, it is stated that none of the ESF system components are not within the scope of the BWR Stress Corrosion Cracking Program.

Please provide the details that justify this statement.