ML18003A391: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 15: Line 15:
| page count = 8
| page count = 8
}}
}}
See also: [[see also::IR 05000400/1978008]]


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:fq~a P@L Carolina Power&Light Company January 2, 1979 Mr.James P."0;.Reilly
{{#Wiki_filter:fq ~a P@L Carolina Power & Light Company January 2, 1979 Mr. James P. "0;.Reilly United States'uclear Regulatory Commission Region II 101 Marietta Street, Northwest Atlanta, Georgia 30303
United States'uclear
 
Regulatory
==Dear Mr. O'Reilly:==
Commission
 
Region II 101 Marietta Street, Northwest Atlanta, Georgia 30303 Dear Mr.O'Reilly: In reference to your letter of December 12, 1978, referring to RII: RDB 50-400/78-08, 50-401/78-08, 50-402/78-08, and 50-403/78-08, the attached is Carolina Power&Light Company's reply to the deficiencies
In reference to your letter of December 12, 1978, referring to RII:   RDB 50-400/78-08, 50-401/78-08, 50-402/78-08, and 50-403/78-08, the attached is Carolina Power & Light Company's reply to the deficiencies as identified. It is considered that the corrective and preventive actions taken are satisfactory for resolution of these items.
as identified.
Thank you<or your consideration in this matter.
It is considered
Yours very   truly, P. M. Howe Vice President Technical Services FES/gea Attachment cc:   Mr. J. A. Jones V901 290     /D/
that the corrective
411 Fayottovitlo Stroot ~ P. O. Box 1551 ~ Raleigh, N. C. 27602       '1Q( lrAV
and preventive
 
actions taken are satisfactory
4  J g
for resolution
                    '~i"'Y5>>
of these items.Thank you<or your consideration
        '1&r ~A J
in this matter.Yours very truly, P.M.Howe Vice President Technical Services FES/gea Attachment
                    ~
cc: Mr.J.A.Jones V901 290/D/411 Fayottovitlo
                            ~V
Stroot~P.O.Box 1551~Raleigh, N.C.27602'1Q(lrAV  
                    ';.,Fii.
J 4 g J'1&r~A'~i"'Y5>>~~V';.,Fii.I~J I"~7 t~~gjg~g t  
I ~
VIOLATIONS
J I
A., Condition Re orted Section F(5)of the Construction
                            "~7 t~
Permit states, in part, that the applicant shall take the necessary mitigating
                ~gjg~g   t
action, including those summarized
 
in Section 4.6 of the Revised Environmental
VIOLATIONS A., Condition Re orted Section F(5) of the Construction Permit states, in part, that the applicant shall take the necessary mitigating action, including those summarized in Section 4.6 of the Revised Environmental Statement, during construction of the station, to avoid unnecessary adverse environmental impacts from construction activities.
Statement, during construction
Contrary to the above, inspection disclosed that, at least during the two week period prior to and including inspection, no mitigating action was implemented to control or otherwise minimize the unacceptable impact of road dust resulting from construction activities at the station power block.
of the station, to avoid unnecessary
Corrective Ste   s Taken and   Results Achieved
adverse environmental
: 1. Contractor   was remobilized November 15, 1978, to assist in watering roads.
impacts from construction
: 2. Reimplemented dust control measles November 15, 1978. Site roadways are watered as required to keep dust down. Watering is commenced when deemed necessary by either the Site Manager, Environmental Engineer, Construction Manager or General Superintendent.
activities.
I>,
Contrary to the above, inspection
Corrective Ste   s Taken   to Avoid Further Noncom liance
disclosed that, at least during the two week period prior to and including inspection, no mitigating
: 1. Additional water truck has been ordered to improve the site's ability to control dust during dry periods.
action was implemented
Date When   Full Com liance   Was Achieved November 15, 1978 B. Condition   Re orted Section 4.6 (4.6.l.l.e) of the Revised Final Environmental Statement, as referenced in Section F(5) of the Construction Permit, requires, in part, that erosion and soil runoff causing contamination of surface waters will be minimized. It further requires, during early construction of the main dam, the use of smaller sediment traps, collection ditches, and intercepts to reduce the silt load to such waters.
to control or otherwise minimize the unacceptable
Contrary to the above, inspection disclosed that the licensee failed to minimize contamination and silt loading of Buckhorn Creek at the main dam construction site.
impact of road dust resulting from construction
Corrective Ste   s Taken and   Results Achieved Pursuant to North Carolina Administrative Code 15 NCAC 4B .0005a, an Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan was submitted to the North Carolina Division of Land Resources on April 7, 1978 for the main dam. The Plan was approved by the Division of Land Resources subject to the condition that modifications could be required to improve the performance and effectiveness of the approved erosion control measures under actual field conditions. Accordingly, the following additional measures have-been implemented:
activities
: 1. Placed stone filter around standpipe of silt pond loc<<ed south     << the cofferdam.
at the station power block.Corrective
: 2. Constructed additional, larger capacity, silt pond downstream of original silt pond south of the cofferdam.
Ste s Taken and Results Achieved 1.Contractor
 
was remobilized
7p
November 15, 1978, to assist in watering roads.2.Reimplemented
~ W~     +If P     g   I r>Mgl~
dust control measles November 15, 1978.Site roadways are watered as required to keep dust down.Watering is commenced when deemed necessary by either the Site Manager, Environmental
              'ay y
Engineer, Construction
1y
Manager or General Superintendent.
                  ~A
I>, Corrective
              /
Ste s Taken to Avoid Further Noncom liance 1.Additional
l:
water truck has been ordered to improve the site's ability to control dust during dry periods.Date When Full Com liance Was Achieved November 15, 1978 B.Condition Re orted Section 4.6 (4.6.l.l.e)
t,t P
of the Revised Final Environmental
r~T I
Statement, as referenced
0
in Section F(5)of the Construction
 
Permit, requires, in part, that erosion and soil runoff causing contamination
1 V'
of surface waters will be minimized.
Violat i'ops Page   2
It further requires, during early construction
: 3. Seeded   slopes around the two south         silt ponds.~
of the main dam, the use of smaller sediment traps, collection
: 4. Constructed additional silt pond northwest of the             dam to catch runoff from adjacent spoil area.
ditches, and intercepts
: 5. Enlarged and installed riser pipe           in silt pond north of the dam on the east side of Buckhorn Creek.
to reduce the silt load to such waters.Contrary to the above, inspection
: 6. Seeded   east bank of Buckhorn Creek at south end of           dam.
disclosed that the licensee failed to minimize contamination
: 7. Put in additional ditching along east side of Buckhorn Creek to channel runoff into the silt pond.
and silt loading of Buckhorn Creek at the main dam construction
: 8. Put in ditching along west side 'of         Buckhorn Creek north of the dam to direct runoff into the silt pond.
site.Corrective
Corrective Ste     s Taken to Avoid Further Noncom liance V     II The senior CP&L representative at the Main Dam shall accompany the contractor's representative on comprehensive inspection tours of all sediment control device>>
Ste s Taken and Results AchievedPursuant to North Carolina Administrative
at least monthly to ensure proper maintenance and construction of additional devices as necessary, Date When   Full   Com   liance     Was Achieved December 21, 1978 C. Conditions   Re orted Criterion   V of Appendix B to 10CFR50 as implemented by Carolina Power and Light PSAR Section 1.8.5.5, states in part that, "Activities affecting quality shall be prescribed by documented instructions, procedures, or drawings . . . and shall be accomplished in accordance with these instructions, procedures or drawings." Shearon Harris Specification CAR-SH-CH-6, "Concrete" and referenced ASTM Standard C-136 require that sieves used for grain-size analysis conform to the requirements of ASTM Standard Ell.
Code 15 NCAC 4B.0005a, an Erosion and Sedimentation
Contrary to the above, discussions with responsible engineers indicated that sieves used for grain-size analysis of fine aggregates are not checked for conformance to ASTM Standard Ell.
Control Plan was submitted to the North Carolina Division of Land Resources on April 7, 1978 for the main dam.The Plan was approved by the Division of Land Resources subject to the condition that modifications
Corrective Ste     s Taken and Results Achieved
could be required to improve the performance
: 1. Procured Finescale Model No. 20 Magnifying Comparator and set of reticles for sieve sizes in question. (Received on site December 21, 1978)
and effectiveness
: 2. Checked   all   sieves, sizes g4 through 4200, in use         and in stock, for conformance with       ASTM   Standard Ell nominal opening size requirements.
of the approved erosion control measures under actual field conditions.
: 3. All sieves     checked were found       to comply with ASTM Ell requirements with respect to nominal opening sizes.
Accordingly, the following additional
 
measures have-been implemented:
Lg
1.Placed stone filter around standpipe of silt pond loc<<ed south<<the cofferdam.
  'P       ~
2.Constructed
  <<4t l
additional, larger capacity, silt pond downstream
pl r
of original silt pond south of the cofferdam.  
      ~,
~W~r>Mgl~7p+If P g I'ay y 1y~A/l: t,t P r~T I 0  
k ~
1 V'Vio lat i'ops Page 2 3.Seeded slopes around the two south silt ponds.~4.Constructed
      ~ ~
additional
u;I'
silt pond northwest of the dam to catch runoff from adjacent spoil area.5.Enlarged and installed riser pipe in silt pond north of the dam on the east side of Buckhorn Creek.6.Seeded east bank of Buckhorn Creek at south end of dam.7.Put in additional
 
ditching along east side of Buckhorn Creek to channel runoff into the silt pond.8.Put in ditching along west side'of Buckhorn Creek north of the dam to direct runoff into the silt pond.Corrective
Violations Page 3 Corrective Ste s Taken to Avoid Further Noncom liance
Ste s Taken to Avoid Further Noncom liance V II The senior CP&L representative
: l. A written instruction has been drafted which requires marking and checking all sieves for conformance to ASTM Ell when received and visually checking fine aggregate sieves for holes and tears prior to each use.
at the Main Dam shall accompany the contractor's
Date When Full Com liance Will Be Achieved January 5, 1979
representative
 
on comprehensive
0
inspection
    *IN ~
tours of all sediment control device>>at least monthly to ensure proper maintenance
    ~ JO' J. r I
and construction
H R}}
of additional
devices as necessary, Date When Full Com liance Was Achieved December 21, 1978 C.Conditions
Re orted Criterion V of Appendix B to 10CFR50 as implemented
by Carolina Power and Light PSAR Section 1.8.5.5, states in part that,"Activities
affecting quality shall be prescribed
by documented
instructions, procedures, or drawings...and shall be accomplished
in accordance
with these instructions, procedures
or drawings." Shearon Harris Specification
CAR-SH-CH-6,"Concrete" and referenced
ASTM Standard C-136 require that sieves used for grain-size
analysis conform to the requirements
of ASTM Standard Ell.Contrary to the above, discussions
with responsible
engineers indicated that sieves used for grain-size
analysis of fine aggregates
are not checked for conformance
to ASTM Standard Ell.Corrective
Ste s Taken and Results Achieved 1.Procured Finescale Model No.20 Magnifying
Comparator
and set of reticles for sieve sizes in question.(Received on site December 21, 1978)2.Checked all sieves, sizes g4 through 4200, in use and in stock, for conformance
with ASTM Standard Ell nominal opening size requirements.
3.All sieves checked were found to comply with ASTM Ell requirements
with respect to nominal opening sizes.  
.Lg'P~<<4tl'pl r~, k~~~u;I'  
Violations
Page 3 Corrective
Ste s Taken to Avoid Further Noncom liance l.A written instruction
has been drafted which requires marking and checking all sieves for conformance
to ASTM Ell when received and visually checking fine aggregate sieves for holes and tears prior to each use.Date When Full Com liance Will Be Achieved January 5, 1979  
0'*IN~~JO'J.r I H R
}}

Latest revision as of 20:45, 3 February 2020

Responds to NRC 781212 Ltr Re Violations Noted in IE Insp Repts 50-400/78-08,50-401/78-08,50-402/78-08 & 50-403/78-08. Corrective Actions:Roads Were Watered,Dust Control Measures Reimplemented & Insp of All Sediment Control Devices Begun
ML18003A391
Person / Time
Site: Harris  Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 01/02/1979
From: Howe P
CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT CO.
To: James O'Reilly
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
Shared Package
ML18003A390 List:
References
NUDOCS 7901290404
Download: ML18003A391 (8)
v • d • e


Text

fq ~a P@L Carolina Power & Light Company January 2, 1979 Mr. James P. "0;.Reilly United States'uclear Regulatory Commission Region II 101 Marietta Street, Northwest Atlanta, Georgia 30303

Dear Mr. O'Reilly:

In reference to your letter of December 12, 1978, referring to RII: RDB 50-400/78-08, 50-401/78-08, 50-402/78-08, and 50-403/78-08, the attached is Carolina Power & Light Company's reply to the deficiencies as identified. It is considered that the corrective and preventive actions taken are satisfactory for resolution of these items.

Thank you<or your consideration in this matter.

Yours very truly, P. M. Howe Vice President Technical Services FES/gea Attachment cc: Mr. J. A. Jones V901 290 /D/

411 Fayottovitlo Stroot ~ P. O. Box 1551 ~ Raleigh, N. C. 27602 '1Q( lrAV

4 J g

'~i"'Y5>>

'1&r ~A J

~

~V

';.,Fii.

I ~

J I

"~7 t~

~gjg~g t

VIOLATIONS A., Condition Re orted Section F(5) of the Construction Permit states, in part, that the applicant shall take the necessary mitigating action, including those summarized in Section 4.6 of the Revised Environmental Statement, during construction of the station, to avoid unnecessary adverse environmental impacts from construction activities.

Contrary to the above, inspection disclosed that, at least during the two week period prior to and including inspection, no mitigating action was implemented to control or otherwise minimize the unacceptable impact of road dust resulting from construction activities at the station power block.

Corrective Ste s Taken and Results Achieved

1. Contractor was remobilized November 15, 1978, to assist in watering roads.
2. Reimplemented dust control measles November 15, 1978. Site roadways are watered as required to keep dust down. Watering is commenced when deemed necessary by either the Site Manager, Environmental Engineer, Construction Manager or General Superintendent.

I>,

Corrective Ste s Taken to Avoid Further Noncom liance

1. Additional water truck has been ordered to improve the site's ability to control dust during dry periods.

Date When Full Com liance Was Achieved November 15, 1978 B. Condition Re orted Section 4.6 (4.6.l.l.e) of the Revised Final Environmental Statement, as referenced in Section F(5) of the Construction Permit, requires, in part, that erosion and soil runoff causing contamination of surface waters will be minimized. It further requires, during early construction of the main dam, the use of smaller sediment traps, collection ditches, and intercepts to reduce the silt load to such waters.

Contrary to the above, inspection disclosed that the licensee failed to minimize contamination and silt loading of Buckhorn Creek at the main dam construction site.

Corrective Ste s Taken and Results Achieved Pursuant to North Carolina Administrative Code 15 NCAC 4B .0005a, an Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan was submitted to the North Carolina Division of Land Resources on April 7, 1978 for the main dam. The Plan was approved by the Division of Land Resources subject to the condition that modifications could be required to improve the performance and effectiveness of the approved erosion control measures under actual field conditions. Accordingly, the following additional measures have-been implemented:

1. Placed stone filter around standpipe of silt pond loc<<ed south << the cofferdam.
2. Constructed additional, larger capacity, silt pond downstream of original silt pond south of the cofferdam.

7p

~ W~ +If P g I r>Mgl~

'ay y

1y

~A

/

l:

t,t P

r~T I

0

1 V'

Violat i'ops Page 2

3. Seeded slopes around the two south silt ponds.~
4. Constructed additional silt pond northwest of the dam to catch runoff from adjacent spoil area.
5. Enlarged and installed riser pipe in silt pond north of the dam on the east side of Buckhorn Creek.
6. Seeded east bank of Buckhorn Creek at south end of dam.
7. Put in additional ditching along east side of Buckhorn Creek to channel runoff into the silt pond.
8. Put in ditching along west side 'of Buckhorn Creek north of the dam to direct runoff into the silt pond.

Corrective Ste s Taken to Avoid Further Noncom liance V II The senior CP&L representative at the Main Dam shall accompany the contractor's representative on comprehensive inspection tours of all sediment control device>>

at least monthly to ensure proper maintenance and construction of additional devices as necessary, Date When Full Com liance Was Achieved December 21, 1978 C. Conditions Re orted Criterion V of Appendix B to 10CFR50 as implemented by Carolina Power and Light PSAR Section 1.8.5.5, states in part that, "Activities affecting quality shall be prescribed by documented instructions, procedures, or drawings . . . and shall be accomplished in accordance with these instructions, procedures or drawings." Shearon Harris Specification CAR-SH-CH-6, "Concrete" and referenced ASTM Standard C-136 require that sieves used for grain-size analysis conform to the requirements of ASTM Standard Ell.

Contrary to the above, discussions with responsible engineers indicated that sieves used for grain-size analysis of fine aggregates are not checked for conformance to ASTM Standard Ell.

Corrective Ste s Taken and Results Achieved

1. Procured Finescale Model No. 20 Magnifying Comparator and set of reticles for sieve sizes in question. (Received on site December 21, 1978)
2. Checked all sieves, sizes g4 through 4200, in use and in stock, for conformance with ASTM Standard Ell nominal opening size requirements.
3. All sieves checked were found to comply with ASTM Ell requirements with respect to nominal opening sizes.

Lg

'P ~

<<4t l

pl r

~,

k ~

~ ~

u;I'

Violations Page 3 Corrective Ste s Taken to Avoid Further Noncom liance

l. A written instruction has been drafted which requires marking and checking all sieves for conformance to ASTM Ell when received and visually checking fine aggregate sieves for holes and tears prior to each use.

Date When Full Com liance Will Be Achieved January 5, 1979

0

  • IN ~

~ JO' J. r I

H R

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML18003A391&oldid=2422218"