ML062090383: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| number = ML062090383 | | number = ML062090383 | ||
| issue date = 07/21/2006 | | issue date = 07/21/2006 | ||
| title = | | title = Email: (PA) Fwd: RAI for Section 3.5 | ||
| author name = Hoang D | | author name = Hoang D | ||
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/ADRO/DLR | | author affiliation = NRC/NRR/ADRO/DLR | ||
| addressee name = Davis J | | addressee name = Davis J | ||
| addressee affiliation = NRC/NRR | | addressee affiliation = NRC/NRR | ||
| docket = 05000293 | | docket = 05000293 | ||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:James Davis -Fwd: Re: RAI for section 3.5 Page 1 1 From: To: Date: | {{#Wiki_filter:James Davis - Fwd: Re: RAI for section 3.5 Page 1 1 From: Dan Hoang To: jad Date: 07/21/2006 11:16:05 AM | ||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
Fwd: Re: RAI for section 3.5 Jim, I think Erach forget to included your name Dan | |||
17: 35058) | |||
c:\temp\GW)00001.TMP Page IV1 c:tepGW- O .M Pq 1 Mail Envelope Properties (44COEFAB.924: 17: 35058) | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
Fwd: Re: RAI for section 3.5 Creation Date 07/21/2006 11:15:55 AM From: Dan Hoang Created By: DVH@nrc.,ov Recipients nrc.gov OWGWPO03.HQGWDO01 JAD (James Davis)Post Office Route OWGWPO03.HQGWDO01 nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 411 07/21/2006 11:15:55 AM Mail Options Expiration Date: None Priority: | Fwd: Re: RAI for section 3.5 Creation Date 07/21/2006 11:15:55 AM From: Dan Hoang Created By: DVH@nrc.,ov Recipients nrc.gov OWGWPO03.HQGWDO01 JAD (James Davis) | ||
-Standard ReplyRequested: | Post Office Route OWGWPO03.HQGWDO01 nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 411 07/21/2006 11:15:55 AM Mail Options Expiration Date: None Priority: - Standard ReplyRequested: No Return Notification: None Concealed | ||
No Return Notification: | |||
None Concealed | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
No Security: | No Security: Standard Junk Mail Handling Evaluation Results Message is not eligible for Junk Mail handling Message is from an internal sender Junk Mail settings when this message was delivered Junk Mail handling disabled by User Junk Mail handling disabled by Administrator Junk List is not enabled Junk Mail using personal address books is not enabled Block List is not enabled | ||
Standard Junk Mail Handling Evaluation Results Message is not eligible for Junk Mail handling Message is from an internal sender Junk Mail settings when this message was delivered Junk Mail handling disabled by User Junk Mail handling disabled by Administrator Junk List is not enabled Junk Mail using personal address books is not enabled Block List is not enabled James Davis -TEXT.htm Page 1 ý-l Jae" ai T" X h--ag 1 Dan, Please include a lead-in paragraph before asking the questions as follows: 1. For those AMR results line items that reference Table 3.5.1, item 3.5.1-39 the applicant stated that for loss of material of carbon steel fire hose reels and damper framing exposed to a protected from weather environment is managed using the Fire Protection Program. However, the discussion column of Table 3.5.1, line item 3.5.1-39 does not credit the Fire Protection Program. Moreover, based on the program description, and the enhancements, it seems the appropriate program that should have been credited was Fire Water System Program.The applicant is requested to justify why the Fire Protection Program was not credited in the discussion column of Table 3.5.1, line item 3.5.1-39, and which is the correct program that should have been credited.2. Although in the discussion column of Table 3.5.1, line item 3.5.1-45, PNPS stated that abrasion and cavitiation due to flowing water is insignificant, nonetheless, the Structures Monitoring Program will confirm the absence of aging effects for PNPS group 6 concrete structures. | |||
However, there is no line item in the AMR results Table 2 where the Table 1 line item 3.5.1-45 is referenced. | James Davis - TEXT.htm Page 1 ý-l Jae" ai T" X h--ag 1 Dan, Please include a lead-in paragraph before asking the questions as follows: | ||
: 1. For those AMR results line items that reference Table 3.5.1, item 3.5.1-39 the applicant stated that for loss of material of carbon steel fire hose reels and damper framing exposed to a protected from weather environment is managed using the Fire Protection Program. However, the discussion column of Table 3.5.1, line item 3.5.1-39 does not credit the Fire Protection Program. Moreover, based on the program description, and the enhancements, it seems the appropriate program that should have been credited was Fire Water System Program. | |||
The applicant is requested to justify why the Fire Protection Program was not credited in the discussion column of Table 3.5.1, line item 3.5.1-39, and which is the correct program that should have been credited. | |||
: 2. Although in the discussion column of Table 3.5.1, line item 3.5.1-45, PNPS stated that abrasion and cavitiation due to flowing water is insignificant, nonetheless, the Structures Monitoring Program will confirm the absence of aging effects for PNPS group 6 concrete structures. However, there is no line item in the AMR results Table 2 where the Table 1 line item 3.5.1-45 is referenced. | |||
The applicant is requested to justify why there is no AMR results Table 2 line item where the Table 1 line item 3.5.1-45 is referenced or revise the LRA to include this reference. | The applicant is requested to justify why there is no AMR results Table 2 line item where the Table 1 line item 3.5.1-45 is referenced or revise the LRA to include this reference. | ||
---------------- | ---------------- Original message -------------- | ||
Original message -------------- | |||
From: "Dan Hoang" <.DVH@nrc.gov> | From: "Dan Hoang" <.DVH@nrc.gov> | ||
> Ram,> As discussed with Erach Patel here are the two RAI questions to the PNPS.> 1- The applicant is requested to justify why the Fire Protection Program was not> credited in the discussion column of Table 3.5.1, line item 3.5.1-39, and which> is the correct program that should have been credited.> 2- The applicant is requested to identify the line item in the AMR results Table> 2 where the Table I line item 3.5.1-45 is referenced. | > Ram, | ||
There needs to be line> item that references item 3.5.1-45, similar to how 3.5.1-47, and 48 are> referenced. | > As discussed with Erach Patel here are the two RAI questions to the PNPS. | ||
> Thanks, James Davis -TEXT.htm Page 2j> Dan}} | > 1- The applicant is requested to justify why the Fire Protection Program was not | ||
> credited in the discussion column of Table 3.5.1, line item 3.5.1-39, and which | |||
> is the correct program that should have been credited. | |||
> 2- The applicant is requested to identify the line item in the AMR results Table | |||
> 2 where the Table I line item 3.5.1-45 is referenced. There needs to be line | |||
> item that references item 3.5.1-45, similar to how 3.5.1-47, and 48 are | |||
> referenced. | |||
> Thanks, | |||
James Davis - TEXT.htm Page 2j | |||
> Dan}} | |||
Latest revision as of 18:31, 7 December 2019
| ML062090383 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Pilgrim |
| Issue date: | 07/21/2006 |
| From: | Dan Hoang NRC/NRR/ADRO/DLR |
| To: | Jennifer Davis Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| %dam200612, TAC MC9669 | |
| Download: ML062090383 (4) | |
Text
James Davis - Fwd: Re: RAI for section 3.5 Page 1 1 From: Dan Hoang To: jad Date: 07/21/2006 11:16:05 AM
Subject:
Fwd: Re: RAI for section 3.5 Jim, I think Erach forget to included your name Dan
c:\temp\GW)00001.TMP Page IV1 c:tepGW- O .M Pq 1 Mail Envelope Properties (44COEFAB.924: 17: 35058)
Subject:
Fwd: Re: RAI for section 3.5 Creation Date 07/21/2006 11:15:55 AM From: Dan Hoang Created By: DVH@nrc.,ov Recipients nrc.gov OWGWPO03.HQGWDO01 JAD (James Davis)
Post Office Route OWGWPO03.HQGWDO01 nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 411 07/21/2006 11:15:55 AM Mail Options Expiration Date: None Priority: - Standard ReplyRequested: No Return Notification: None Concealed
Subject:
No Security: Standard Junk Mail Handling Evaluation Results Message is not eligible for Junk Mail handling Message is from an internal sender Junk Mail settings when this message was delivered Junk Mail handling disabled by User Junk Mail handling disabled by Administrator Junk List is not enabled Junk Mail using personal address books is not enabled Block List is not enabled
James Davis - TEXT.htm Page 1 ý-l Jae" ai T" X h--ag 1 Dan, Please include a lead-in paragraph before asking the questions as follows:
- 1. For those AMR results line items that reference Table 3.5.1, item 3.5.1-39 the applicant stated that for loss of material of carbon steel fire hose reels and damper framing exposed to a protected from weather environment is managed using the Fire Protection Program. However, the discussion column of Table 3.5.1, line item 3.5.1-39 does not credit the Fire Protection Program. Moreover, based on the program description, and the enhancements, it seems the appropriate program that should have been credited was Fire Water System Program.
The applicant is requested to justify why the Fire Protection Program was not credited in the discussion column of Table 3.5.1, line item 3.5.1-39, and which is the correct program that should have been credited.
- 2. Although in the discussion column of Table 3.5.1, line item 3.5.1-45, PNPS stated that abrasion and cavitiation due to flowing water is insignificant, nonetheless, the Structures Monitoring Program will confirm the absence of aging effects for PNPS group 6 concrete structures. However, there is no line item in the AMR results Table 2 where the Table 1 line item 3.5.1-45 is referenced.
The applicant is requested to justify why there is no AMR results Table 2 line item where the Table 1 line item 3.5.1-45 is referenced or revise the LRA to include this reference.
Original message --------------
From: "Dan Hoang" <.DVH@nrc.gov>
> Ram,
> As discussed with Erach Patel here are the two RAI questions to the PNPS.
> 1- The applicant is requested to justify why the Fire Protection Program was not
> credited in the discussion column of Table 3.5.1, line item 3.5.1-39, and which
> is the correct program that should have been credited.
> 2- The applicant is requested to identify the line item in the AMR results Table
> 2 where the Table I line item 3.5.1-45 is referenced. There needs to be line
> item that references item 3.5.1-45, similar to how 3.5.1-47, and 48 are
> referenced.
> Thanks,
James Davis - TEXT.htm Page 2j
> Dan