Revision as of 07:07, 20 August 2018

Text

IR 05000263-10-007, on 09/13/2010 - 10/01/2010; Monticello Nuclear Generating Station; Biennial Baseline Inspection of the Identification and Resolution of Problems
	ML103140760
Person / Time
Site:	Monticello
Issue date:	11/10/2010
From:	Riemer K R; NRC/RGN-III/DRP/B2
To:	O'Connor T J; Northern States Power Co
References
	IR-10-007
	Download: ML103140760 (29)
	v • d • e

November 10, 2010

Mr. Timothy Site Vice President Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant Northern States Power Company, Minnesota 2807 West County Road 75 Monticello, MN 55362-9637

SUBJECT: MONTICELLO NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION AND RESOLUTION INSPECTION REPORT 05000263/2010007

Dear Mr. O'Connor:

On October 1, 2010, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed a Problem Identification and Resolution (PI&R) inspection at your Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant. The enclosed report documents the inspection results, which were discussed on October 1, 2010, with you and other members of your staff. The inspection examined activities conducted under your license as they relate to safety and compliance with the Commission's rules and regulations and with the conditions of your license.

The inspectors reviewed selected procedures and records, observed activities, and interviewed personnel. The inspection concluded that your staff was effective at identifying problems and incorporating them into the corrective action program (CAP). In general, issues were appropriately prioritized, evaluated, and corrected; audits and self-assessments were thorough and probing, and operating experience was appropriately screened and disseminated. Your staff was aware of the importance of having a strong safety-conscious work environment and expressed a willingness to raise safety issues. The inspectors also observed that actions taken to address a declining trend in Human Performance appeared to be effective. However, your staff was not fully effective in addressing an adverse trend in contractor oversight and in work control and planning, which had begun earlier this year. Although both issues were captured in the CAP program, the underlying causes were not fully understood. This resulted in corrective actions being more reactive, instead of proactive, when responding to related issues. The inspectors were concerned that this adverse trend, if not resolved, would negatively impact the significant number of work activities planned for next year. No violations or findings were identified during this inspection. In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter, its enclosure, and your response (if any) will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records System (PARS) component of NRC's document system (ADAMS).

ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Website at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).

Sincerely,/RA/

Kenneth Riemer, Chief Branch 2 Division of Reactor Projects

Docket No. 50-263 License No. DPR-22

Enclosure:

Inspection Report 05000263/2010007

w/Attachment:

Supplemental Information

cc w/encl: Distribution via ListServe

U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION III Docket No. 50-263 License No. DPR-22 Report No: 05000263/2010007 Licensee: Northern States Power Company, Minnesota Facility: Monticello Nuclear Generating Station Location: Monticello, MN Dates: September 13 - October 1, 2010 Inspectors: N. Shah, Project Engineer - Team Lead D. Sand, Acting Resident Inspector - Monticello C. Scott, Reactor Engineer G. O'Dwyer, Reactor Engineer M. Phalen, Plant Support Specialist

Approved by: Kenneth Riemer, Chief Branch 2 Division of Reactor Projects Enclosure

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS

IR 05000263/2010007; 09/13/2010 - 10/01/2010; Monticello Nuclear Generating Station; Biennial Baseline Inspection of the Identification and Resolution of Problems. This team inspection was performed by four regional inspectors and the resident inspector. No violations or findings were identified. Identification and Resolution of Problems

Overall, the Corrective Action Program (CAP) was good. Issues were effectively identified, evaluated and corrected. Nuclear Oversight (NOS) audits and department self-assessments were generally critical and identified issues that were captured in the (CAP). Operating Experience (OE) was well communicated and appropriately evaluated. A strong safety culture was evident, based on interviews with licensee staff and a review of the types of issues captured in the CAP and Employee Concerns Program (ECP). The inspectors observed that the evaluation of OE in Apparent Cause Evaluations (ACEs) had improved since the 2008 PI&R inspection. Specifically, ACEs now discussed whether the failure to properly evaluate previously identified OE was a potential precursor of the event. The licensee took proactive efforts to address a declining trend in the Security Department Safety-Conscious Work Environment (SCWE). The inspectors received positive feedback during interviews with Security officers, and noted an increasing trend in the number of issues identified by the Security force. The licensee's actions to address the previous cross-cutting issues in Human Performance and a potential cross-cutting issue in Issue Evaluation appeared good. The corrective actions appeared appropriate and the inspectors noted improving performance over the last six months in these areas. However, the inspectors noted that the licensee had recurring problems with managing the CAP backlog and with ensuring that items identified during management observations were captured in the CAP. The inspectors also identified some examples where licensee staff had changed due dates for subtasks without referencing the source CAP report. The inspectors identified that CAP implementing procedures did not provide good guidance regarding how to evaluate "critical" and "non-critical" component failures. Specifically, some component failures, which could reasonably be considered "critical," (i.e., had significant consequences) could be classified as "non-critical" using the current guidance. The inspectors observed that there were continuing issues related to work planning and execution and with contractor control. Although both problems were captured in the CAP, the underlying causes were not yet fully understood, resulting in most of the corrective actions being reactive rather than proactive. For example, it was unclear whether the underlying causes that affected site human performance were the same issues that were affecting the contractor performance. In addition, as previously stated, some issues identified through management observations associated with these topics may not be captured in the CAP.

Although the station continued to evaluate the issue, it remained an area of concern given the significant outage work planned for the next year.

A. NRC-Identified

and Self-Revealed Findings No findings were identified.

B. Licensee-Identified Violations

No violations of significance were identified.

REPORT DETAILS

OTHER ACTIVITIES

4OA2 Problem Identification and Resolution (PI&R)

Main article: IP 71152B

The activities documented in sections

.1 through .4 constituted one biennial sample of PI&R as defined in Inspection Procedure (IP) 71152.

.1 Assessment of the Corrective Action Program (CAP) Effectiveness

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors reviewed the licensee's CAP implementing procedures and attended CAP program meetings to assess the implementation of the CAP by site personnel.

The inspectors reviewed risk and safety significant issues in the licensee's CAP since the last NRC PI&R inspection in November 2008. The issues selected were appropriately varied across the NRC cornerstones, and were identified through routine daily plant activities, licensee audits and self-assessments, industry operating experience reports, and NRC inspection activities. The inspectors also reviewed a selection of apparent, common and root cause evaluations for more significant CAP items. The inspectors performed a more extensive review of the licensee's efforts to address ongoing issues with human performance and issue evaluation. This review consisted primarily of a five year search of related issues identified in the CAP and discussions with appropriate licensee staff to assess the licensee's corrective actions.

During the reviews, the inspectors evaluated whether the licensee staff's actions were in compliance with the facility's CAP and 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B requirements.

Specifically, whether licensee personnel were identifying plant issues at the proper threshold, entering the plant issues into the station's CAP in a timely manner, and assigning the appropriate prioritization for resolution of the issues. The inspectors also evaluated the timeliness and effectiveness of corrective actions for selected issue reports, completed investigations, and NRC findings.

All documents reviewed during this inspection were listed in the Attachment to this report.

b. Assessment (1) Effectiveness of Problem Identification The licensee's implementation of the CAP was generally good. Workers were encouraged to identify issues and were familiar with the various avenues available (NRC, CAP, etc). This was evident by the large number of CAP items generated annually, which were reasonably distributed across the various departments. A shared computerized database was used for creating individual reports and for subsequent management of the processes of issue evaluation and response. This included determining the issue's significance, addressing such matters as regulatory compliance and reporting, and assigning any actions deemed necessary or appropriate.

In reviewing licensee management observations conducted between June and October 2010, the inspectors found several examples of items that were apparently not captured in the CAP. Most of the examples were concerned with industrial safety or work planning issues that should have been captured in the CAP. In one example, a worker observing an industrial safety concern stated that because the worker had not met a management expectation, vice a procedural requirement, the issue wasn't going to be documented in the CAP. The licensee documented the inspectors' concern as CAP item 1251890. The licensee was also good at identifying and resolving trends. The inspectors noted a large number of trends identified through the "binning" of issues or via the quarterly department roll-up meeting (DRUM) reports. During the November 2008, PI&R review, the inspectors identified that the licensee's trending program was somewhat limited in that it did not always identify trends with issues affecting the same functional area, but having dissimilar aspects. Subsequently, the licensee initiated an effort to assign cross-cutting criteria (analogous to NRC criteria)to apparent and root cause evaluations, which were then trended. Although the inspectors considered this a positive effor t, it was too early to determine its overall effectiveness.

Findings No findings were identified.

(2) Effectiveness of Prioritization and Evaluation of Issues Overall, CAP issues were being properly screened. The majorities of issues were of low level and were either closed to trend or at a level appropriate for a condition evaluation.

Licensee staff appropriately challenged CAP items during screening meetings and were cognizant of potential trends. Most issues were closed to a work request or to another CAP item. The inspectors noted that both the parent and daughter documents had the necessary verbiage to document the interrelationship. Although fewer in number, the inspectors did not have any concerns with those issues assigned an apparent cause evaluation (ACE) or root cause evaluation. There were no items in the operations, engineering, or maintenance backlogs that were risk significant, individually or collectively. There were no classifications or immediate operability determinations with which the inspectors disagreed.

Root and apparent cause evaluations were generally of good quality and were well documented. During the 2006 PI&R inspection, the inspectors noted that ACEs did not consider whether the failure to consider industry OE was a precursor to events.

Additionally, licensee management did not always address issues with ACE quality that were identified during the evaluation grading process. The inspectors noted that subsequent ACEs now addressed whether OE was properly used prior to the event and that ACE quality issues were communicated to the originating departments.

Station Procedure FP-E-SE-02, "Component Classification," was used by licensee staff to distinguish between a "critical" and "non-critical" component failure.

The procedure was written specifically to address equipment reliability, but was referenced in the CAP for use during cause evaluations. Although the stated guidance was adequate for 5 Enclosure equipment reliability considerations, it was not appropriate for CAP evaluations. For example, this procedure specifically defines any component failure that results in a significant radiological release as a "non-critical" component failure. From a CAP perspective, any component failure resulting in significant radiological consequences would be "critical." The inspectors were concerned that this procedure may result in some component failures being treated as less significant under the CAP, then appropriate. The licensee initiated CAP item 1250116 to review this issue. Since 2006, the licensee has experienced numerous issues in human performance.

Initially, these issues were primarily of lo w significance (i.e., did not result in an NRC finding). However, the issues continued through 2008, with the significance of the findings increasing, until an adverse trend in human performance had become evident.

The licensee's early efforts to address this trend were largely ineffective, as the licensee originally believed that the human performance issues were limited to specific behaviors or work groups, instead of a more widespread concern involving fundamental human behaviors. Subsequently, the licensee identified that the issues were principally due to a lack of resources and an inappropriate tolerance for risk among workers. Several corrective actions were initiated, including additional training to site workers on configuration control and risk management. The inspectors noted that performance had improved among site workers in the past six months. However, the licensee was still dealing with an adverse trend in contractor human performance, primarily related to oversight and work planning and execution. Although this issue was captured in the CAP (items 1249158 and 1247197), the underlying causes are not yet fully understood, and many of the corrective actions, to date, have been more reactive than proactive. For example, it is unclear whether the underlying causes that affected site human performance were also affecting the contractor performance. To date, the majority of the issues have been of low significance (i.e., not resulting in an NRC finding); however, the overall trend was similar to the previous issue with site human performance.

Findings

Introduction:

The inspectors identified an Unresolved Item (URI) regarding the High Energy Line Break (HELB) Analyses.

Description:

As part of the review of the ACE for an adverse trend in double disc gate valve (DDGV) local leak rate testing (LLRT) performance documented in CAP 1202466, the inspectors noted that the ACE had determined that the valves' performance degradation did not prevent the valves from performing their safety function. The ACE only addressed the valves' safety function of providing containment isolation. The inspectors questioned if the safety function of the high pressure coolant injection (HPCI), reactor core isolation cooling (RCIC) and reactor water cleanup (RWCU) steam supply valves to close after detection of a HELB should have been considered. The licensee responded that the ACE did not need to consider the effect of the valves' increased leakage on the HELB analyses because any leakage would not impact the alternate shutdown path. The inspectors reviewed the assumptions and acceptance criteria of the HELB calculations for HPCI, RCIC and RWCU line breaks and identified potential inconsistencies between the calculations' assumptions with Technical Specifications' and UFSAR allowed values for valve closure times, incorporation of delay actuations, and isolation initiation signals. The licensee entered the NRC concerns with these 6 Enclosure potential inconsistencies into the CAP by initiating CAP 01252363 on October 1, 2010. The licensee stated that the calculations were appropriate and provided the inspectors

with some original licensing documents for the HELB analyses; however, additional questions remained. This issue will be tracked as URI 05000263/201007-01 pending further NRC review of the licensee responses and the HELB analyses and determination of the original and current licensing bases.

(3) Effectiveness of Corrective Actions The inspectors concluded that corrective actions for identified deficiencies were generally timely and adequately implemented, commensurate with their safety significance. Those corrective actions addressing selected NRC documented violations were also generally effective and timely.

The inspectors verified that work orders were in place (and scheduled) for selected, open actions that were two years old or greater.

During interviews, the inspectors noted that some individuals did not refer back to the parent CAP when changing due dates for associated subtasks (such as work requests).

The inspectors identified several examples where the revised due dates for subtasks were inconsistent with the parent CAP. Although none of the identified examples were highly significant, the inspectors were concerned that the practice may result in other changes having a greater operational impact. The licensee initiated CAP item 1250089 to evaluate this issue.

The station has a recurring problem with managing the backlog. A recent licensee initiative to redefine the items tracked in the backlog has reduced the numbers, but didn't necessarily address the issue. The licensee currently tracks only Corrective Actions, Corrective Actions to Prevent Recurrence, and operability issues. Other items, that used to be part of the backlog, were instead tracked as CAP action items. However, the inspectors noted that there was no formal effort to determine whether the CAP action items were being addressed in a timely fashion (i.e., no performance indicator similar to the formal backlog indicator). Since these action items were corrective actions (albeit of lower significance), the inspectors were concerned that some may not get implemented. Complicating the issue was an apparent mixed message from station management, who expressed the view that the backlog numbers weren't important so long as items were being properly managed. Since this issue was already captured in the CAP, the inspectors' observations were included as part of the ongoing licensee evaluation.

Findings No findings were identified.

.2 Assessment of the Use of Operating Experience (OE)

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors reviewed the licensee's implementation of the facility's OE program. Specifically, the inspectors reviewed implementing OE program procedures, attended CAP meetings to observe the use of OE information, completed evaluations of OE issues and events, and selected assessments of the OE composite performance indicators. The inspectors' review was to determine whether the licensee was effectively 7 Enclosure integrating OE experience into the performance of daily activities, whether evaluations of issues were proper and conducted by qualified personnel, whether the licensee's program was sufficient to prevent future occurrences of previous industry events, and whether the licensee effectively used the information in developing departmental assessments and facility audits. The inspectors also assessed if corrective actions, as a result of OE experience, were identified and effectively and timely implemented.

Documents reviewed during this inspection are listed in the Attachment to this report.

b. Assessment In general, OE was effectively used at the station. The inspectors observed that OE was discussed as part of the daily station planning meetings, at shift turnover meetings, and at maintenance pre-briefings. Also, the inspectors determined that OE was appropriately reviewed during causal evaluations. During interviews, several licensee personnel commented favorably on the use of OE in their daily activities.

The inspectors noted that the OE evaluation for a relay failure that resulted in the inoperability of a safety-related train at Harris (Action Request (AR) 1233871) was somewhat limited in scope. The evaluation identified that similar relays were used at Monticello, but in non-safety related equipment; therefore, no actions were required. However, there was no documented evaluation whether a failure of these relays in the affected equipment could have had any significant operational impact. The licensee documented this issue as CAP item 1252873.

Findings No findings were identified.

.3 Assessment of Self-Assessments and Audits

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors assessed the licensee staff's ability to identify and enter issues into the CAP program, prioritize and evaluate issues, and implement effective corrective actions, through efforts from departmental assessments and audits.

b. Assessment The inspectors concluded that self-assessments and audits were typically accurate, thorough, and effective at identifying issues and enhancement opportunities at an appropriate threshold level. The audits and self-assessments were completed by personnel knowledgeable in the subject area, and the quality of the NOS audits was thorough and critical. The self-assessments were acceptable but were not at the same level of quality as the NOS audits. The inspectors observed that CAP items had been initiated for issues identified through the NOS audits and self-assessments.

The inspectors observed selected meetings of the Performance Assessment Review Board and reviewed board meeting minutes over the past six months. The Board provided oversight for the CAP including the self-assessment program. The inspectors identified no issues with the Board's performance during the inspection.

Findings No findings were identified.

.4 Assessment of Safety-Conscious Work Environment (SCWE)

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors assessed the licensee's SCWE through the reviews of the facility's ECP implementing procedures, discussions with ECP coordinators, interviews with personnel from various departments, and reviews of issue reports. The inspectors also reviewed the results of licensee safety culture surveys.

b. Assessment The inspectors determined that the plant staff were aware of the importance of having a strong SCWE and expressed a willingness to ra ise safety issues. No one interviewed had experienced retaliation for safety issues raised, or knew of anyone who had failed to raise issues. All persons interviewed had an adequate knowledge of the CAP and ECP process. These results were similar to the findings of the licensee's safety culture surveys. Based on these interviews, the inspectors concluded that there was no evidence of an unacceptable SCWE.

The inspectors noted that the licensee had taken proactive efforts to address a declining SCWE trend within the Security force. This trend had been identified through self-assessments and audits conducted in 2009. The number of issues self-identified by the security staff had increased since the corrective actions were implemented.

Additionally, during interviews with the inspectors, Security staff commented favorably on the licensee initiatives to improve the SCWE.

The inspectors determined that the ECP process was being effectively implemented. The review of the selected ECP issues indicated that site personnel were appropriately using the CAP and ECP to identify concerns. However, many staff were unaware of the

other avenues the licensee had to raise concerns (collectively known as the PEACH process). For example, most staff were unaware of the Differing Professional Opinions (DPO) program for addressing engineering issues. Additionally, some newer staff confused safety culture with industrial safety. Similar issues were identified during the 2008 PI&R inspection. The licensee captured these issues as CAP item 1252870.

Findings No findings were identified.

4OA6 Management Meetings

.1 Exit Meeting Summary

On October 1, 2010, the inspectors presented the inspection results to Mr. O'Connor and other members of the licensee staff. The licensee acknowledged the issues presented. The inspectors confirmed that none of the potential report input discussed was considered proprietary.

ATTACHMENT:

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

KEY POINTS OF CONTACT

Licensee

H. Butterworth, Fleet Operations Standards Director

P. Byers, Security Manager

J. Early, Emergency Preparedness Manager

N. Haskell, Engineering Director

M. Holmes, Radiation Protection/Chemistry Manager

K. Jepson, Business Support Manager

J. Mestad, Employ Concerns Program Manager

D. Neve, Regulatory Affairs Manager

J. Ohotto, Design Engineering Manager

T. O'Connor, Site Vice-President

S. Porter, System Engineering Manager

S. Radebaugh, Acting Plant Manager

S. Sharpe, Operations Manager

G. Sherwood, Program Engineering Manger

T. Toglery, Nuclear Oversight Manager

J. Windchill, Fleet Performance Assessment Manager

Nuclear Regulatory Commission

K. Riemer, Chief, Branch 2, Division of Reactor Projects

LIST OF ITEMS

OPENED, CLOSED AND DISCUSSED

Opened: URI

05000263/201007-01 HELB Analysis Potentially Non-Conservative

Attachment

LIST OF DOCUMENTS REVIEWED

The following is a list of documents reviewed during the inspection.

Inclusion on this list does not imply that the NRC inspectors reviewed the documents in their entirety, but rather, that selected sections of portions of the documents were evaluated as part of the overall inspection effort.

Inclusion of a document on this list does not imply NRC acceptance of the document or any part of it, unless this is stated in the body of the inspection report.

PLANT PROCEDURES

Number Description or Title Date or Revision

FP-PA-ARP-01 CAP Action Request Process Revision 27

FG-PA-CAE-01 Corrective Action Effectiveness Review Manual Revision 6

FG-PA-ACE-01 Apparent Cause Evaluation Manual Revision 17

FG-PA-RCE-01 Root Cause Evaluation Manual Revision 17

FG-PA-CTC-01 CAP Trend Code Manual Revision 12

FP-PA-OE-01 Operating Experience Program Revision 14

FG-PA-KPI-01 Performance Indicator Data Reporting Revision 0

FP-E-SE-02 Component Classification Revision 4

EWI-05.02.01 Maintenance Rule Program Document Revision 16

B.5.12 System Basis Document:

Area Radiation Monitor Revision 3 B.7.1 System Basis Document:

Liquid Radwaste Revision 2

CORRECTIVE ACTION PROGRAM DOCUMENTS

Number Description or Title Date or Revision

AR 114145-13 Incorrect Grounding Trucks Installed in 4KV

Cubicles 9/8/2008

AR 1150968

Continuing Issues With FME Control on Turbine Floor 8/20/2009

AR 1168344-01 TS Action for CREF Exited Prior to all PMTs Being Completed

3/8/2009

AR 1166773-01 Adverse Trend in Rigor of Implementing SOER Recommendations

2/26/2009

AR 1170876 Lack of Safety Related Material Control/Traceability

9/14/2009

AR 1167946-01 Level A and B CAs Closed to Actions Outside the CAP 3/21/2009

AR 1205719-02 ARM S&C Refurb Not Performed IAW Tech Manual 12/4/2009

AR 1211312 NOS Finding:

Configuration Control Performance Issues 3/3/2010

AR 1226594 Work Tasks Authorized Without Proper C/O C/L

Hung 6/18/2010

AR 1228190 NOS Finding-Weak Barriers in Work Management

5/25/2010

AR 1237891 Failed Bellows Spring in Positioned Removed from

CV-1242

6/28/2010

AR 1158526 Adverse Trend In Work Package Quality

2/10/2008

Attachment CORRECTIVE ACTION PROGRAM DOCUMENTS

Number Description or Title Date or Revision

AR 01194357 Potential Trend WM ID'd in Ops 4

th Qtr 2008 DRUM

Potential Trend JP&P ID'd in Ops 4

th Qtr 2008 DRUM

Adverse Trend in FME issues

Ops CSE ID's AFI in Objective 3 Adverse Trend: work plan changes made w/o review & approval Potential trend DP ID'd in Ops 4

th Qtr 2008 DRUM Adverse Trend in Program Management Issues

AFI Independent FSA Monti Human Performance Adverse Trend in OSHA reportable injuries Recirc riser relay did not respond to de-energize

position during IST

LOR Annual Operating Exam Issues

Proposed NRC Violation - Reactor Level Control

- 9/11 Scram HPCI failed to trip when Rx level rose to 48" Rx Low Low Water Level signal received during

CRD pump start Voltage of cell 116 in #17 battery is at 2.07 Volts Not all Tech Specs were entered

2009 Ops CSE - AFI Objective 5 AFI 5.1 A SBGT Flow Not Within Band Assessment AFI ID'd for licensed operator

medicals

B SBGT failed to operate as expected

Adverse Trend - Procedure performed without OPS Auth. GE Part 21 (SC05-03) Potential to exceed low pressure limit Main Steam Line plugs interfere with separator removal SPDS Disp 710 showing incorrect configuration of circuit breaker

NRC Commitments in procedures not meeting

requirements Station challenged by projects interface/alignment issues Unplanned rise in Offgas Radiation and Stack

WGRM's Loss of motor cooling to Div II RHRSW Pumps

LPCI Select Interlock Channel Functional Test Failure Adverse Trend; Inadequate maintenance of QA

reports Adverse Trend; Badge control by site personnel Door-18, Condenser room flood door found closed

1/29/2009

3/18/2009

10/13/2008

6/09/2009

1/29/2009

9/07/2010

11/26/2008

8/5/2008 5/13/2010

11/7/2008

3/26/2009

9/21/2008

1/12/2010

2/17/2009

7/20/2009

7/10/2009

6/28/2009

4/9/2009

3/30/2005

3/20/2007

9/24/2008

10/8/2008

10/2/2008

10/31/2007

5/6/2008

6/25/2010

5/19/2009

9/9/2009

8/20/2009

Attachment CORRECTIVE ACTION PROGRAM DOCUMENTS

Number Description or Title Date or Revision

FME - Drier Measurement Platform Wheel Inadequate shutdown margin during

EOC-23 core

alterations Reactor Scram Number 121 occurred on Sept

th, 2008 Ops Trng CSE identifies AFI's in Objective 1-4 Performance gaps to industry standards not recognized

4/20/2009

11/13/2008

9/12/2008

9/18/2008

1/30/2010

AR 01144214-02 Trend-RCE Grades Low in 2 Areas

7/2008

AR 01173245 Actions to Address Equipment Problems are Shortsighted

4/15/2009

AR 01186832 Core Spray Pump Quarterly Test Terminated Due to No Flow

6/25/2009

AR 1191812 Adverse Trend in Failure Rates to ACEs Assigned to Projects

7/31/2009

AR 01216127

PI.2-2 ACEs Do Not Always Address Org or Prgrm Contributors

1/30/2010

AR 01174411 PRNMS:

Ineffective Condition Evaluation

CE01162340-02

3/23/2009

AR 01187909 Accountability in Meeting CAP Action Due Dates Tracking 7/2/2009

AR 01238254 PI&R FSA AFI:

Rigor in Resolving NRC Violations Not Consistent

6/22/2010

AR 1222439 MNGP EPU Mod 3 Surveillance

3/12/2010

AR 01208801 Three NRC X-Cutting Findings in One Aspect

2/1/2009

AR 01216516 Station hs Three Potential Findings in One NRC Xcut Aspect

2/2/2010

AR 01215513 Potential Adverse Trend Recent Events/Near Misses 1/27/2010

AR 01170720 Inconsistent CAP Problem Statements CA Quality

ACE Quality

2/25/2009

AR 01232886 Adverse Trend-Corrective Action Backlog Exceeding Goal

5/14/2010

AR 01150601 Ops Tng CSE Identifies Ineffective Closure of CA

9/15/2008

AR 01157287 Red

KPI-NRC Cross Cutting Aspects (H.4.c.) Oversight

10/29/2008

AR 1226438 Site Received Fourth P.1.c Cross Cutting Aspect from NRC 4/8/2010

AR 01147103 Adv Trnd in Organization Perf. Leads to Near Miss Events

8/9/2008

AR 01137245 Station KPI for NRC Cross-Cutting Issue-

Potential Red

5/9/2008

AR 01184816 Evaluation of Project Dept Clock Resets During

2009 Outage

6/8/2009

AR 01163396 Adverse Trend in HU Identified in 3 Quarter 2008

Site DRUM

2/22/2008

Attachment CORRECTIVE ACTION PROGRAM DOCUMENTS

Number Description or Title Date or Revision

AR 01135426 CAPRs From RCEs Non Institutionalized

4/23/2008

AR 01138493 Adverse Trend in Human Performance

5/22/2008

AR 01158802 Potential Adverse Trend-Station Cross Cutting Issues PI&R

11/11/2008

AR 1161531 Reoccurring Qualification Issues at Monticello

2/05/2008

AR 1199160 Unexpected

AR-10 Discharges on the Range

2/01/2010

AR 1140153 Adverse Trend in Refueling Floor Activities

2/17/2009

AR 1169027 High Radiation Controls Violation

06/01/2010

AR 1170636 Security Human Performance Adverse Trend

03/24/2009

AR 1161679 Potential Adverse Trend - Security Weapons / Ammo Handling

01/16/2009

AR 1210338 Adverse Trend - BRE Issues

2/30/2010

AR 1150642 Incomplete Information Sent to NRC on an Operator's License Renewal Application

09/15/2008

AR 1136955 Adverse Trend in Service Water Radiation Monitor Flow 05/07/2008

AR 1177731 Adverse Trend in LLRT Radiation Exposure

04/10/2009

AR 1164409 Increased Trend in Badge Control Issues

03/02/2009

AR 1135335 Adverse Trend in Emergency Planning Drill /

Exercise Report Timeliness

08/21/2008

AR 1215924 EP Department Performance Has Declined

03/12/2010

AR 1174197 Lengthy Out Of Service Time for EP Equipment

07/31/2009

AR 1216118 EP 1-1 ERO personnel Make Knowledge Based Errors 09/03/2010

AR 1215924 Site EP Precursors to Further Declining Performance

10/29/2010

AR 1188771 Follow-up PAR Development Inaccurate /

Untimely 11/17/2009

AR 1135335 Adverse Trend in Emergency Planning Drill /

Exercise Report Timeliness

08/21/2008

AR 1215924 EP Department Performance Has Declined

03/12/2010

AR 1217199 Security Officer Failed to Perform a Security Patrol 08/31/2010

AR 1168195 Rx Water Soluble Co-60 No Longer Trending Down 02/05/2009

AR 1207385 SGI Package Not Properly Marked

03/31/2010

AR 1204338 New Security Door to Intake Tunnel Found Closed

04/23/2010

AR 1156598 Security Force on Force Exercises

08/21/2009

AR 1238171 Unexpected Dose rates Encountered During RWCU

BW 06/21/2010

AR 1164240 Movement of Radioactive material Not in Accordance with AWI

01/02/2009

AR 1196952 Low level of Tritium in Monitoring Well (MW-9)

09/09/2009

AR 1207960

AR 01214941

Unexpected Change in DW CAM Particulate Activity Inadequate Documentation of Design Inputs

2/10/2009

2/22/2010

Attachment CORRECTIVE ACTION PROGRAM DOCUMENTS

Number Description or Title Date or Revision

AR 01209649-01

AR 1088210-01

P-109C, 13 RHRSW Pump D/P in Alert Range

Adverse Trend in Bearing Failures on 11 CRD

Pump

CBDI FOF Mod Did Not Assess Impact to T-44

Tank SRV Lift Test Surveillance Interval Potentially Missed Thin Pipe Identified During MIC Exam On 18 A

RHRSW

Appendix J Programmatic Deficiencies Post-Modification Testing Issues Adverse Trend in Engineering Department HP

Clock Resets

CDBI- Calculation Quality- Adverse Trend

EPU-Wiring Discrepancy Discovered in Field Adverse Trend in Feedwater Heater Level Transmitter Replacement

1AR XFMR Lockout Caused By 1N^ Ground

Fault Declining Trend-Engineering Work Process-Work Control Mgmt Adverse Trend Control of Engineering MTE

Part of Head Vent Line Not Insulated

D10 125VDC Div 1 Battery Charger Unavailability Exceeds MR Goal

D10 Exhibits Erratic Voltage Output During Surveillance Clearance and Tagging Issues Degraded HELB Flow Path Over The SLAE Room Missing Instillation On The Head Vent Valve

Manifold Equalizing Valve Failure Causes 'B' Main Steam Line Flow Isolation Instrument to Become Inoperable

Work Performed Without Adequate Tag-Out Protection Failure to Promptly Identify Failed SBGT

Surveillance Failures of V-AC-4 (B4305) and V-AC-5 (B3305)

Adverse Trend for Engineering Non-Mod

EC Backlog Failures of V-AC-4 Declining Trend for Engineering- Process Failure Mode-RR1

Increasing Trend for System Health Assessment

KPI 04/06/2010

03/31/2010

11/02/2009

05/14/2010

03/31/2009

04/23/2009

11/13/2009

09/25/2009

11/11/2009

03/04/2009

10/25/2009

04/14/2010

2/19/2009

05/29/2009

09/21/2010

09/29/2010

05/09/2008

2/04/2010

01/05/2007

04/20/2007

05/12/2009

08/03/2009

08/21/2009

05/22/2009

01/22/2009

09/19/2007

01/01/2009

10/14/2008

Attachment ROOT, APPARENT AND COMMON CAUSE EVALUATIONS

Number Description or Title Date or Revision

AR 1140145 Incorrect Grounding Trucks Installed in 4KV

Cubicles 6/6/2008

EFR 1140145-24 Effectiveness Review of

CAP 1140145-05 Truck Installation Procedure

11/6/2009

EFR 114145-25 Effectiveness Review of Grounding Truck Installation

11/6/2009

AR 1150968 JLG Lift Basket Contacts 115 KV

9/17/2008

EFR 1150968-10 Effectiveness Review for AR

CAP 1150968 Lift Contacts 115 KV

9/30/2009

PCR 1152979 Revise

FP-SC-GEN-08 Revision 2

9/30/2008

AR 1158526 Adverse Trend in Work Package Quality

11/7/2008

AR 1166773 Adverse Trend in Rigor of Implementing SOER Recommendations

1/26/2009

AR 1167946 Mid Cycle FSA

AFI 11-CAsClosed to Actions Outside the CAP

2/3/2009

AR 1168344 TS Action for CREF Exited Prior to all PMTs Being Completed

2/5/2009

AR 1170876 Lack of Safety Related Material Control/Traceability

2/25/2009

AR 1183728 Continuing Issues with FME Control on Turbine Floor 5/29/2009

AR 1166773-01 Adverse Trend in Rigor of Implementing SOER Recommendations

1/26/2009

AR 1167946-01 Level A and B CAs Closed to Actions Outside the CAP 2/3/2009

AR 1168344 TS Action for CREF Exited Prior to All PMTs Being Completed

2/5/2009

AR 1202466 Adverse Trend in Double Disc Gate Valve LLRT Performance

10/14/2009

AR 1205719 ARM S&C Refurb not Performed IAW Tech Manual 11/4/2009

AR 1211312 NOS Finding:

Configuration Control Performance Issues 12/18/2009

AR 1226594 Work Tasks Authorized Without Proper C/O C/L

Hung 4/9/2010

AR 1228190 NOS Finding-Weak Barriers in Work Management

4/20/2010

AR 1237891 Failed Bellows Spring In Positioned Removed from

CV-1242

6/18/2010

AR 1095181 PRA Compliance With Regulatory Guide 1.200

6/5/2007

AR 1121269 SOER 07-02 on Intake Cooling Water Blockage

2/14/2007

AR 01237478 PI&R FSA; All req's for

CAP 01189206 not performed

6/16/2010

AR 01237558 PI&R FSA; Trend in security trng team used for shift needs

6/16/2010

Attachment CORRECTIVE ACTION PROGRAM DOCUMENTS

Number Description or Title Date or Revision

AR 01237585 PI&R FSA; CAP closed out to action in GAR

6/16/2010

AR 01237702 PI&R FSA; Documenting Completion of actions unclear in 2 FBMs

6/17/2010

AR 01237779 PI&R FSA; No CAP tracking completion of Top Ten Eqp. Items

6/17/2010

AR 01237802 PI&R FSA; No action to track completion of work under B CAP

6/17/2010

AR 01237820 CAP extension documentation missing, found during PI&R FSA

6/18/2010

AR 01237838 PI&R FSA - CAPR process not followed for form revision 6/18/2010

AR 01237839 PI&R FSA: Typos and dated info in Ops Burden Report 6/18/2010

AR 01237876 PI&R OE evaluation uploaded in sharepoin is not correct 6/18/2010

AR 01237905 PI&R FSA - overdue operating experience actions 6/18/2010

AR 01237917 2010 PI&R FSA: Lack of documentation for level of effort

6/18/2010

AR 01237928 2010 PI&R FSA: CAP not written for identified issue 6/18/2010

AR 01238082 PI&R FSA CAPs - INPO AFIs don't considtently meet standards

6/21/2010

AR 01238284 PI&R FSA AFI: Root Cause Statements - CA Line of Sight 6/22/2010

AR 01238292 PI&R FSA AFI: Independent workers applying own standards on CAP initially

6/22/2010

AR 01243250 PI&R FSA - Ops Status Notes Not Sustainalbe for Fire Pump

7/28/2010

AR 01243411 PI&R FSA Review ACE to CE for

01174955

7/29/2010

AR 01243430 PI&R FSA corrective action for

AR 1199936

7/29/2010

AR 01243485 PI&R FSA - CAP Improperly closed to no action

7/29/2010

AR 01243644 PI&R FSA -

CAP 01141018 Screening N Notes are incorrect

7/30/2010

AR 01243728 PI&R FSA - EFR assignment

CAP 01165741 had no goal stated

7/30/2010

AR 01244435 PI&R Inspection self assessment identified 4kv rooms issue

8/5/2010

AR 01139415 D10 125VDC Battery Charger Unavailability exceeds MR goal

5/30/2008

AR 01155593 Inability to attract personnel due to Industry Competition

10/15/2008

AR 01158868

RF 24

MS 38 for preoutage work in jeopardy

11/11/2008

AR 01159308 IR24

MS 13 for work order planning above control band 11/15/2008

Attachment CORRECTIVE ACTION PROGRAM DOCUMENTS

Number Description or Title Date or Revision

AR 01167860 Mid cycle FSA AFI 3 - Insufficient operations staffing plan

2/3/2009

AR 01179605 Greater than 1 yr will be needed to qualify a SM candidate

4/25/2009

AR 01180220 Quality issues found on Isophase Bus Cooling System 4/30/2009

AR 01200192 Emergent Contractor Trng request diverts Maint Training resource

9/29/2009

AR 01217990 EP Drill - Not enough controllers in the Plant during drill

2/12/2010

AR 01227941 RWCU restoration time discrepancy

4/19/2010

AR 01230850 EM&P Resource Availability impacts scheduled work 5/3/2010

AR 01233699 Operations unable to support system walkdown

5/20/2010

AR 01237487 Personnel removed from Training to cover Shift staffing need

6/15/2010

AR 01240903 Supervisor pulled from training to meet staffing needs 7/9/2010

AR 01227056 One Live Ammo Round at STF Mixed with Training Rounds

4/13/2010

AR 01225619 Unable to Obtain Definitive Reading of TS

Required Parameter

4/2/2010

AR 01181388 "B" Safety Relief Valve Leaking

5/8/2009

AR 01243585 Program Deficiencies From PHC Not Incorporated into CAP 7/30/2010

AR 01181249 HPCI Governor Valve Failed to Open During Overspeed Test

5/7/2009

AR 01083169 Crack Like Indication on Steam Dryer Found in

2007 RFO 3/20/2007

AR 01070668 Rx Bldg RR Doors Switched in HELB Gothic Model 1/8/2007

AR 01206949 Incorrect Severity Assigned to

CAP 01184369-02

11/16/2009

AR 01243568 PI&R FSA Potential

AR 1150849 Screening

7/30/2010

AR 01225682 1AR Transformer Pad Has Sunk about 1 inch since Install

4/4/2010

AR 01225762 #12 RHRSW Pump has Excessive Packing Leakage 4/5/2010

AR 01225888

SW Pump Inducing Vibrations on 13 ESW

Pump

4/6/2010

AR 01225997 CAP Closure Review-"B" Action Closure Quality Issues 4/6/2010

AR 01226060 12 RFP L.O. Cooler Piping Rusting Through Upstream of

TI-1555

4/6/2010

AR 01135291 Internal Threads on WDW7 Look Bad

4/22/2008

AR 01135409 Questionable Off-Gas Sample

4/23/2008

AR 01136879 Oil Flush on 11 Service Water Motor Ineffective

5/6/2008

Attachment CORRECTIVE ACTION PROGRAM DOCUMENTS

Number Description or Title Date or Revision

AR 01137901

The Site Lacks a Single Tracking Mechanism for

Failed PMTs

5/15/2008

AR 01138283

CAP 1102406 Trending Closed to "B' ACE With No Reference

5/20/2008

AR 01138824 Battery Chargers Maintenance Rule Status Declining

5/27/2008

AR 01178034 Employee Exceeded Work Hours

4/13/2009

AR 01179554 SBLC Tank Level is Lower After Draining and Refilling

4/25/2009

AR 01179701 Lack of Alternative Access Increases Operator Response Time

4/27/2009

AR 01216080 Snowmelt Causes Possible EOP Entry Alarm

1/29/2010

AR 01217767

RR-4902 Has Incorrect Chart paper During Test

289-A 2/11/2010

AR 01219159 Alt N2 Train Pressures at Low End of Allowed Operating Band

2/19/2010

AR 01212202 RCIC is Conservatively Declared Inoperable

2/31/2009

AR 01212209 Both LPCI Subsystems Declared Inoperable During Venting

2/31/2009

AR 0119936 Voltage Drop Evaluation for RHR and RHRSW

ASCO Sol. Valves

9/28/2009

AR 01197431

CDBI-Undocumented Assumption in Calculation

06-104 9/12/2009

AR 01200723 CDBI P-111B Calculated Starter Voltage Lower Than Expected

10/2/2009

AR 01210817 NRC Feedback on Reportability of SBGTS Event

2/15/2009

AR 01150773 Some Station Log Entries Were Not Made During SCRAM 121

9/16/2008

AR 01151413 Rx Low Low Water Level Signal Received During CRD Pump Start

9/21/2008

AR 01200304

AO-2945 Failed to Open During 0253-01 "A" SBGT QTRLY Test

9/29/2009

AR 01220488 NRC Violation for Failure to Make 10CFR50.72 Notification

3/1/2010

AR 01175537 NDE Examiner Procedure Non-Compliance

3/29/2009

AR 01216894 Loss of Offsite Power 10CFR50.72 Reporting Reqts. 2/4/2010

AR 01082564 Reactor Core Water Level Recorder Found Failed Upscale 3/16/2007

AR 01131103

ITS 125V DC Charger SR 3.8.4.2-Option 2

Unachievable

3/14/2008

AR 01106816 Charcoal Filter Iodine Loading Calcs Non-Conservative

8/14/2007

AR 01143954 11/12 CT Pump Operation Safety Enhancement Opportunity

07/13/2008

Attachment CORRECTIVE ACTION PROGRAM DOCUMENTS

Number Description or Title Date or Revision

AR 01243644 PI&R FSA-

CAP 01141018 Screening N Notes are Incorrect

07/30/2010

AR 01237813 Buried Pipe Health Report Issues/ Exemplary Rating Questioned

06/18/2010

AR 01158314 11 Air Compressor PM Deleted But Has NRC Commitement

11/05/2008

AR 01184683 Adverse Trend-DW Floor and Equipment Drain Sump Issues

06/05/2009

AR 01184683-03 EFR- Effectiveness of Potentiometers DWEDS,DWFDS

07/31/2010

AR 01197773 Revise

ISP-RHR-0558-01 as Interim Action for

RCE 1181868

11/09/2009

AR 01197769 Revise 0056 as Interim Corrective Action For

RCE 1181868

2/11/2009

AR 01181868 Leaking Manifold Valve for

DPIS-2-117A B Stm Line Flow

05/13/2009

AR 01093089 Non-Conservative Input to AST Post- Local pH

06/15/2009

AR 01064602 Shortcomings in Cross Referencing CAPS and

WRs 06/10/2008

AR 01087740 Pipe Downstream of

PCV-1242 is Significantly Thinned 06/05/2009

AR 01070668 RX Bldg RR Doors Switched in HELB Gothic Model 01/16/2009

AR 01127660 Surveillance 1467 Extended Twice

03/29/2008

AR 01119232 Abandoned Limit Swithces in Second Floor EFT Building 03/27/2008

AR 01107610 3 Inch Movement on Moisture Sep. to 14B Htr Pipe 07/15/2009

AR 01105975 Guidance for Use of Third RBCCW Heat Exchanger Inadequate

09/30/2008

AR 01130761

CV-1729 Not Controlling at 7000gpm, Results in Unplanned LCO

03/12/2008

AR 01149748 Loss of Level Indication C MSDT Dump Controller

LC-1003 09/05/2008

AR 01243477 Question Regarding the Control of Radiograpers

07/29/2010

AR 01129677 Area for Improvement

03/03/2008

AR 01243430 PI&R FSA Corrective Action for

AR 1199936

07/29/2009

01150085 Possible Inconsistency Between MPR Setpoint and Calc Input

09/10/2008

01149441 Results of MET CSP Assessment Concluded Further Migration

09/03/2008

01079705 LAR Required for Use of Tormis Code Methodology

2/28/2007

01197771

011977701

Revise

ISP-RHR-0552-01 as interim action for RCE1181868

Revise 0060 As Interim Corrective Action for

RCE1181868

09/15/2009

Attachment CORRECTIVE ACTION PROGRAM DOCUMENTS

Number Description or Title Date or Revision

01197768

01197774

252368

250089

2149351

01159968

Revise 0060 As Interim Corrective Action for RCE1181868

Revise

ISP-RHR-0558-02 As Interim Action for

RCE 1181868

NRC-PI&R-Question on Classification of DW

Sumps NRC PI&R- CA's Not Created for Interim RCE

Actions Several NRC Findings had Improper

AR Assignments per

ARP-01

IPB Mod Design Issues with Service Water Valves

10/10/2010

09/16/2010

10/04/2010

11/20/2008

OPERATING EXPERIENCE

Number Description or Title Date or Revision

OE 31215 Jet Pump Wedge Wear

5/25/2010

01175420 NRC

IN 2009-03:

Solid State Protection System Card Failure Results in Spurious Safety Injection Actuation and Reactor Trip

6/11/2009

01137557 Station OE Evaluation of Industry Documents

5/13/2008

01143701 Station OE Evaluation of

OE 26794

7/10/2008

OE 31105 Water Detected in a Cable Pit Beneath a MCC

which Contained Safety-Related Cables

(Cook Plant)

5/7/2010

01245020 Station OE Evaluation of

OE 31283

8/10/2010

01149696 Fisher Information Notice 1997-01, Supplement 1

9/5/2008

01193202 MNGP OE Evaluation of PINGP

AR 01192430

8/11/2009

01126257 Part 21:

GE Fuel Rod Thermal-Mechanical Methodology

2/05/2008

Weekly OE Screening Minutes

06/10/2010

01180269

Fleet OE Evaluation of INPO OE28618

01142237 OE26962 Flux Map Gaps Ginna

2/02/2009

01145374 Station OE Screen Team Review of OE for Week

07/18/2008

09/23/2008

01142952 Westinghouse Detached P-Grid Dimples

01/09/2009

01149492 Station OE Screen Team Review of OE For Week of 08/29/2008

10/31/2008

01157701

Station OE Evaluation of EO for Week of

10/31/2008

09/30/2009

Attachment

AUDITS, ASSESSMENTS AND

SELF-ASSESSMENTS

Number Description or Title Date or Revision

01121234

FASA of

XCELs Energy's MNGP EPU Outage Project Readiness

2/17/2008

1205004 EPU Outage Readiness Assessment 6/10/2010 2010-02-014 Corrective Action Program 5/14/2010 2010-01-029 Corrective Action Program 3/12/2010

SAR 01205025 PI&R Readiness 9/9/2010

SAR 01249160 Site Roll-up Meeting Results 1

st and 2 nd Quarter 2010 SAR01116710

Component Design Bases Inspection Focused Self-Assessments

11/17/2008

NOS 1 st Quarter 2010 Assessment Report 05/14/2010

NOS 4th Quarter 2009 Assessment Report 03/01/2010

QF-0426 Focused Self-Assessment MNGP Dry Cask Loading Readiness Revision 2

QF-0402 Fleet Focused Self Assessment Report: Reportability

SAR 01117506

Revision 3

1133118 Exposure Monitoring and Dose Control 11/06/2008

CONDITION REPORTS GENERATED DURING INSPECTION

Number Description or Title Date or Revision

AR 1250188 NRC PI&R Process Control for WO from

CA Process

AR 1250127 NRC PI&R:

Closure Documentation for

1150601-06 Inadequate

9/17/2010

AR 1250089 NRC PI&R:

CAs Not Created for Interim RCE Actions

9/16/2010

AR 1249923 NRC PI&R:

NRC is Questioning Status of

25V DC 9/15/2010

AR 1251890 PI&R:

Inconsistencies in Observation Program 9/29/2010

AR 1249158 Contactor Oversight Insufficient to Prevent Performance Issues

10/11/2010

AR 1243583 Incorrect CAP Severity Determination 9/24/2010

AR 1252870 NRC PI&R:

PEACH Process Not Well Understood

10/5/2010

AR 1252873 OE Not Well Evaluated Beyond the Event 10/5/2010

Attachment

MISCELLANEOUS

Number Description or Title Date or Revision

3784 A(1) Action/Performance Improvement Plant Revision 0

NSPM CAP Screening Package 9/16/2010

Performance Assessment Review Board Package 9/14/2010

Alignment Teamwork and Oversight Meeting 9/15/2010

WO 384150

IC-RHR,

ISP-RHR-0552-01 RX Recirc Loop

DP-LPCI INTR FUNCT T

01/27/2010

WO 00388188

IC-RCI, 0060 RCIC High Steam Flow Sensor Test 2/18/2010

Attachment

LIST OF ACRONYMS

USED [[]]

ACE Apparent Cause Evaluation

ADAMS Agencywide Document Access Management System

AR Action Request

CAP Corrective Action Program

CFR Code of Federal Regulations

CAQ Condition Adverse to Quality

DPO Differing Professional Opinion

DRP Division of Reactor Projects

DRUM Department roll-up meeting

ECP Employee Concerns Program

GAR General Action Request

HELB High Energy Line Break

HPCI High Pressure Coolant Injection

IMC Inspection Manual Chapter

IN Information Notices

IP Inspection Procedure

IST In-service test

LER Licensee Event Report

MNGP Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant

MPFF Maintenance Preventable Functional Failure

NCV Non-Cited Violation

NOS Nuclear Oversight

NRC [[]]

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

OE Operating Experience

PARS Publicly Available Records System

PM Preventive Maintenance

PI&R Problem Identification & Resolution

RCIC Reactor Core Isolation Cooling

RHR Residual Heat Removal

RHRSW Residual Heat Removal Service Water

RPS Radiation Protection Specialist

RPS Reactor Protection System

SCAQ Significant Condition Adverse to Quality

SCWE Safety-Conscious Work Environment

SDP Significance Determination Process

SFP Spent Fuel Pool

USAR Updated Safety Analysis Report

WO Work Order

T. O'Connor -2-

No violations or findings were identified during this inspection. In accordance with

10 CFR 2.390 of the

NRC 's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter, its enclosure, and your response (if any) will be available electronically for public inspection in the

NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records System (

PARS ) component of NRC's document system (ADAMS).

ADAMS is accessible from the

NRC Website

at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room). Sincerely,

/RA/

Kenneth Riemer, Chief Branch 2 Division of Reactor Projects

Docket No. 50-263

License No. DPR-22

Enclosure: Inspection Report 05000263/2010007 w/Attachment: Supplemental Information

cc w/encl: Distribution via ListServe

DISTRI BUTION

See next page

DOCUMENT NAME: G:\DRPIII\1-Secy\1-Work In Progress\MON 2010 0007 PIR.docx Publicly Available

Non-Publicly Available

Sensitive Non-Sensitive To receive a copy of this document, indicate in the concurrence box "C" = Copy without attach/encl "E" = Copy with attach/encl "N" = No copy

OFFICE [[]]

RIII N

RIII [[]]

ERIII [[]]

RIII [[]]

NAME NShah KRiemer:cs

DATE 11/09/10 11/10/10

OFFICI AL

RECORD [[]]

COPY Letter to

T. O'Connor from K. Riemer dated November 10, 2010

SUBJEC T: MONTICELLO NUCLEAR GENERATING