ML20125B240: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML20125B240
| number = ML20125B240
| issue date = 10/01/1979
| issue date = 10/01/1979
| title = Responds to 790821 Ltr on Util Actions Following IE Investigation of Facts & Statements Made Re Hypothetical Cask Drop (Rail Cask) Accident Analysis.Findings Indicate No Matl False Statement Made;However,Fsar Should Be Revised
| title = Responds to on Util Actions Following IE Investigation of Facts & Statements Made Re Hypothetical Cask Drop (Rail Cask) Accident Analysis.Findings Indicate No Matl False Statement Made;However,Fsar Should Be Revised
| author name = Thornburg H
| author name = Thornburg H
| author affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE)
| author affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE)
Line 11: Line 11:
| contact person =  
| contact person =  
| document report number = NUDOCS 7910250500
| document report number = NUDOCS 7910250500
| title reference date = 08-21-1979
| package number = ML20125B242
| package number = ML20125B242
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, NRC TO UTILITY, OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, NRC TO UTILITY, OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE
Line 28: Line 29:
==Dear Mr. Lee:==
==Dear Mr. Lee:==


   ,                This is in response to your letter dated August 21,1979 which addressed your actions folloaing our investigation of the facts and statements made concerning the hypothetical cask drop (rail cask) accident analysis which had been performed for the McGuire facility. Our finding was that there was not a material false statement made, but that the FSAR should be revised.
   ,                This is in response to your {{letter dated|date=August 21, 1979|text=letter dated August 21,1979}} which addressed your actions folloaing our investigation of the facts and statements made concerning the hypothetical cask drop (rail cask) accident analysis which had been performed for the McGuire facility. Our finding was that there was not a material false statement made, but that the FSAR should be revised.
I Your response and the information submitted in Amendment #62, on August 31, 1979, have been revieaed and evaluated with regard to the investigation. We have determined that our requests have been fulfilled and that the matter of the rail cask drop accident is closed.
I Your response and the information submitted in Amendment #62, on August 31, 1979, have been revieaed and evaluated with regard to the investigation. We have determined that our requests have been fulfilled and that the matter of the rail cask drop accident is closed.
I wish to thank you for your prompt and complete reoly.
I wish to thank you for your prompt and complete reoly.

Latest revision as of 21:43, 22 September 2022

Responds to on Util Actions Following IE Investigation of Facts & Statements Made Re Hypothetical Cask Drop (Rail Cask) Accident Analysis.Findings Indicate No Matl False Statement Made;However,Fsar Should Be Revised
ML20125B240
Person / Time
Site: McGuire, Mcguire  Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 10/01/1979
From: Thornburg H
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE)
To: Willie Lee
DUKE POWER CO.
Shared Package
ML20125B242 List:
References
NUDOCS 7910250500
Download: ML20125B240 (1)
v • d • e


Text

--

' b

>e

.s * **cua ./- pd

/* e, UNITED sT ATEs $b" NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 8FO

{ .,j . . ,  %,i, WASW.CTON, O C. 20555 y

    • -** OCT 11979 Docket No. 50-369 '

50-370 Duke Power Company Attn: Mr. W. S. Lee President P.O. Box 33189 Charlatte , NC 28242

Dear Mr. Lee:

, This is in response to your letter dated August 21,1979 which addressed your actions folloaing our investigation of the facts and statements made concerning the hypothetical cask drop (rail cask) accident analysis which had been performed for the McGuire facility. Our finding was that there was not a material false statement made, but that the FSAR should be revised.

I Your response and the information submitted in Amendment #62, on August 31, 1979, have been revieaed and evaluated with regard to the investigation. We have determined that our requests have been fulfilled and that the matter of the rail cask drop accident is closed.

I wish to thank you for your prompt and complete reoly.

l l Sincerely, i

1 .

/.L:I d . L W arold D. Thornburg G

Director (

Division of Reactor Construction Inspection Office of Inspection and Enforcement go O 7910250 '

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20125B240&oldid=3472011"