ML20127N303: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 27: Line 27:
==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
COMPLETION OF REVIEW OF ITEM 1.2 POST TRIP REVIEW - DATA AND INFORMATION CAPABILITY, OF GENERIC LETTER 83-28 FOR JOSEPH M.
COMPLETION OF REVIEW OF ITEM 1.2 POST TRIP REVIEW - DATA AND INFORMATION CAPABILITY, OF GENERIC LETTER 83-28 FOR JOSEPH M.
FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNITS 1 AND 2 By letter dated November 4,1983 you responded to Generic Letter (GL) 83-28 j        with regard to required licensee actions based on generic implications of i        the Salem ATWS events. We have completed our review based upon the draft Technical Evaluation Report (TER) provided by our consultant, Science Applications International Corporation. The TER was provided to you by our                          ;
FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNITS 1 AND 2 By {{letter dated|date=November 4, 1983|text=letter dated November 4,1983}} you responded to Generic Letter (GL) 83-28 j        with regard to required licensee actions based on generic implications of i        the Salem ATWS events. We have completed our review based upon the draft Technical Evaluation Report (TER) provided by our consultant, Science Applications International Corporation. The TER was provided to you by our                          ;
letter dated May 10, 1985.                                                                          !
{{letter dated|date=May 10, 1985|text=letter dated May 10, 1985}}.                                                                          !
Subsequently, we held telephone conferences with your staff. These j        conferences resulted in your confinnatory letter dated June 4,1985. On the basis of the enclosed Safety Evaluation we conclude that the actions
Subsequently, we held telephone conferences with your staff. These j        conferences resulted in your confinnatory {{letter dated|date=June 4, 1985|text=letter dated June 4,1985}}. On the basis of the enclosed Safety Evaluation we conclude that the actions
   ;      which you have taken are acceptable. Therefore, Item 1.2 of GL 83-28 is i        complete for Farley Units 1 and 2.
   ;      which you have taken are acceptable. Therefore, Item 1.2 of GL 83-28 is i        complete for Farley Units 1 and 2.
Sincerely, i
Sincerely, i

Latest revision as of 02:22, 22 August 2022

Forwards SER Re Util 831104 Response to Generic Ltr 83-28, Item 1.2, Post-Trip Review (Data & Info Capability). Licensee post-trip Review Data & Info Capabilities Acceptable
ML20127N303
Person / Time
Site: Farley  Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 06/12/1985
From: Varga S
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Mcdonald R
ALABAMA POWER CO.
Shared Package
ML20127N308 List:
References
GL-83-28, NUDOCS 8507010520
Download: ML20127N303 (2)


Text

- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ __. _ _ _ _ - _

June 12,1985 Docket Nos. 50-348 DIST!G UI $N and 50-364 --w H a) NRC PDR i

L PDR ORB #1 Rdg

, Gray File HThompson EJordan OELD Mr. R. P. Mcdonald JPartlow BGrimes i

Senior Vice President EReeves --2 CParrish j; Alabama Power Company ACRS 10 JKramer Post Office Box 2641 ABournia Birmingham, Alabama 35291 l

Dear Mr. Mcdonald:

SUBJECT:

COMPLETION OF REVIEW OF ITEM 1.2 POST TRIP REVIEW - DATA AND INFORMATION CAPABILITY, OF GENERIC LETTER 83-28 FOR JOSEPH M.

FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNITS 1 AND 2 By letter dated November 4,1983 you responded to Generic Letter (GL) 83-28 j with regard to required licensee actions based on generic implications of i the Salem ATWS events. We have completed our review based upon the draft Technical Evaluation Report (TER) provided by our consultant, Science Applications International Corporation. The TER was provided to you by our  ;

letter dated May 10, 1985.  !

Subsequently, we held telephone conferences with your staff. These j conferences resulted in your confinnatory letter dated June 4,1985. On the basis of the enclosed Safety Evaluation we conclude that the actions

which you have taken are acceptable. Therefore, Item 1.2 of GL 83-28 is i complete for Farley Units 1 and 2.

Sincerely, i

I /s/SVarga i

Steven A. Varga, Chief Operating Reactors Branch #1

' Division of Licensing

Enclosure:

As stated i

cc w/ enclosure:

See next page i

i i ORilf . .

  1. :DL ORB CParrish1:DL0]p EReeves;ps Shg-
6/0/85 6////85 6 'N 0507010520 050612

' PDH ADOCK 0D000340 P PDR

, Mr. R. P. Mcdonald Alabama Power Company Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant

~

CC:

Mr. W. O. Whitt D. Biard MacGuineas",, Esquire Executive Vice President Volpe, Boskey and Lyons Alabama Power Company 918 16th Street, N.W.

Post Office Box 2641 Washington, DC 20006 Birmingham, Alabama 35291 Charles R. Lowman Mr. Louis B. Long, General Manager Alabama Electric Corporation Southern Company Services, Inc. Post Office Box 550 Post Office Box 2625 Andalusia, Alabama 36420 Birmingham, Alabama 35202 Chairman Regional Administrator, Region II Houston County Comission U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission Dothan, Alabama 36301 101 Marietta Street, Suite 2900 4 Atlanta, Georgia 30303 George F. Trowbridge, Esquire Shaw, Pittman, Potts and Trowbridge Ira L. Myers, M.D.

1800 M Street, N.W. State Health Officer Washington, DC 20036 State Department of Public Health State Office Building M Montgomery, Alabama 36130

' Robert A. Buettner, Esquire .

Balch, Bingham, Baker, Hawthorne, Williams and Ward Post Office Box 306 Birmingham, Alabama 35201 Resident inspector U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Connission Post Office Box 24 - Route 2 Columbia, Alabama 36319 State Department of Public Health ATTN: State Health Officer State Office Building Montgomery, Alabama 36104

_ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ -