ML20062D691

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Forwards SER Re Response to Generic Ltr 88-11 Concerning NRC Position on Radiation Embrittlement of Reactor Vessel. Compliance w/10CFR50,Appendix G,For Min Upper Shelf Energy Could Not Be Verified.Operation for 16 EFPY Acceptable
ML20062D691
Person / Time
Site: Farley  Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 11/09/1990
From: Hoffman S
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Hairston W
ALABAMA POWER CO.
Shared Package
ML20062D698 List:
References
GL-88-11, TAC-71491, TAC-71492, NUDOCS 9011150089
Download: ML20062D691 (4)


Text

.

  • \\

/

umtro STATES

[,

NUCLEAR REGU'.ATORY COMMISSION g

WASHINu TON, D. C. 20666 November 9, 1990 '

Docket Nos. 50-348 and 50-364 Mr. W. G. Hairston, III Senior Vice President Alabama Power Company i

40 Inverness Center Parkway Post Office Box 1295 Birmingham, Alabama 35201

Dear Mr. Hairston:

I

SUBJECT:

RESPONSE TO GENERIC LETTER 88-11. "NRC POSITION ON RADIATION EMBRITTLEMENT OF REACTOR VESSEL MATERIALS AND ITS IMPACT ON PLANT OPERATIONS," FOR JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT, UNITS 1AND2(TACNOS.71491AND71492)

Generic Letter 88-11 requested that licensees submit the results of their technical analyses, performed using the methodology contained in Revision 2 to Regulatory Guide 1.99, that predict the effects of neutron irradiation on reactor vessel materials.

By letter dated November 23, 1988, as supplemented by letter dated September 17, 1990, you responded to Generic Letter 88-11 and provided the requested information. Your response stated that the technical analysis for Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant -(Farley), Unit 1, showed that the current heatup and cooldown limits in the Technical Specifications are bounded l

by the new methodology of Revision 2 to Regulatory Guide 1.99. For Farley, L

linit 2, the analyses indicated that new Technical Specification heatup and

ooldown limits would be required.

We have reviewed your response.to Generic Letter 88-11 and have performed a confirmatory analysis for farley, Unit 1.

As discussed in the enclosed Safety Evaluation, we concur that the current heatup and cooldown limits in the Farley, Unit 1. Technical Specifications are valid through 16 effective full l

power years of operation on which the current limits are based.

However,.

I compliance with the requirements of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix G, for a minimum upper shelf energy of 50 ft-lb at end-of-life for the limiting reactor vessel material could not be verified. Operation through 16 effective full power years of operation is acceptable, but future submittals will need to demonstrate that this requirement continues to be met.

For Farley, Unit 2, you stated that as a result of your analyses, revised heatup and cooldown limits in the Technical Specifications were required.

By letter dated August 27, 1990, you requested an amendment to the Farley, Unit 2 y

Technical Specifications to revise the heatup and cooldown limits.

In your subrittal, you stated that the revised limits were calculated using the t

methodology contained in Regulatory Guide 1.99, Revision 2.

This amendment request is currently undsr review by the NRC staff, t

901 150009 901109 gDR

}

ADOCK 05 30

-. 7 E

.-_~..

Mr. Hairston 2

Based on our review of your submittals, your response to Generic Letter 88-11 is considered complete. Therefore, we are closing TAC Nos. 71491 and 71492.

Your amendment request for Farley, Unit 2, is being reviewed under TAC No.

77542 and will be responded to in future correspondence.

Sincerely, Orignal signed by:

i Stephen T. Hoffman, Project Manager Project Directorate 11-1 Division of Reactor Projects - I/11 Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation cc: w/ enclosure d

as state r

i l

b.

?

Utc VLA:PD

F FK
PM:PD21:

- lEMCS

D:
DRPR e (>s...:......

......:..=,,

CCheng (/ C

.NAME SPAnde

SHoff c
E isam 3..........:..............:.............

DATE 10/.18/90

10/ / /90
1b/ / /90
10/Y /90 j

OFFICIAL RECORD COPY Document Name:

LTR HAIRSTON 71491/92 r

Mr. W. d. Hairston, !!!

Alabama Power Company Joseph M.-Farley Nuclear Plant CC:

Mr. R. P. Mcdonald Resident Inspector Executive Vice President U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Nuclear Operations P. O. Box 24 - Route 2 Alabama Power Company Columbia, Alabama 36319 P. O. Box 1295 Birmingham, Alabama 35201 Regional Administrator, Region II U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mr. B. L. Moore 101 Marietta Street, Suite 2900 Manager, Licensing Atlanta, Georgia 30323 Alabama Power Company

.P. O. Box 1295 Chairman Birmingham, Alabama 35201 Houston County Commission Dothan, Alabase 36301 Mr. Louis B. Long, General Manager Southern Company Services, Inc.

Claude Earl Fox, M.D.

Houston County Commission State Health Officer P. O. Box 2625 State Department of Public Health Birmingham, Alabama 35202 State Office Building Montgomergy. Alabama 36130 Mr. D. N. Morey General Mancqer - Farley Nuclear at Mr. James H. Miller, !!!, Esq.

P. O. Box 470 Balch and Bingham Ashford, Alabama 36312 P. O. Box 306 1710 Sixth Avenue North Mr. J. ' D. - Woodward Birmingham, Alabama 35201 Vice-President - Nuclear Farley Project Alabama Power Company-P. O. Box 1?95 Birmingham, Alabama 35201 I

f

,_