ML20023D214: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| Line 3,320: | Line 3,320: | ||
t.jf - | t.jf - | ||
N | N | ||
' I'g.! | ' I'g.!)) ina | ||
: 8 ' ! ?'dT ra n . . * . - - - - | : 8 ' ! ?'dT ra n . . * . - - - - | ||
"' i is, (gresci,G j jiglp id! r-!n@d 1 r pl.- | "' i is, (gresci,G j jiglp id! r-!n@d 1 r pl.- | ||
Latest revision as of 09:21, 15 March 2020
| ML20023D214 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | LaSalle, 05000000 |
| Issue date: | 03/11/1983 |
| From: | MULTIMEDIA PROGRAM PRODUCTION, INC. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20023A480 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-82-366 NUDOCS 8305190390 | |
| Download: ML20023D214 (128) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:~ .
.e I
g /&S l l 9 e c Mt%TIMEDIA PROGRAM PRODUCTIONS SYNDICAtlON SERVICt1 P.O. BOX 2111 CINCINNATI, GAIO 45201
#/.v--
DONAHUE 11tANSCRIPT #08302 l APPEARANCES: Mr. Phil Donahue E. Linn Draper Richard Udell ; Amelia Doherty j Kathy McCaughin 4 Phil Donahue: What do you think? Audience: I think solar is the only practical, realistic, and healthful alt e rnative. Phil Donahue: If it's so good how come we don't have it? Audience: The government hasn't been willing to put noney into it and also the petroleum companies aren't going to make a profit off of it. Audience: (Applause) Phil Donahue: You can't put a meter on the , sun. Audience: That's right. Phil Donahue: But we need a combination. We need the conventional and we also need nuclear capacity because it makes us independent of OPEC and then we're not out there on a limb Audience: I don't agree with that at all. I think solar, hydro power and wind power would also give us those alternatives. Phil Donahue But we are already very much into nuclear. Audience: Unf ortuntely, yes. Phil Donahue: Where were you? What do you mean unf ortunate1y Are we too late? Audience: No, I don't think we're too late t.it I don't think we should
; spend all the money on nuclear either.
I Phil Donahue: Meet E. Linn Draper. He is Senior Vice-President Culf
' State was everUtilites andatgou killed breeareMile hereIsland to say among other things that nobody E. Linn Draper I certainly would say that. I would say that a things about nuclear power such as the f act variety'of that other importantit s the second largest generator of electricity in this country.
Phil Donahue: And it's so f ar working and light bulbs go on and the toaster works and you're proud of it are you. I think it's a ver good way to generate t E. Linn Draper: electricity. Itcertainlyisnotrfskfreebutnothingis. But , Phil, we've been running nuclear plants f or twenty-five years. We have eighty of them in operation and they generate about 13% of our electricity. They do it more cheaply than the alterr.stives and I think it's a technology tha* we can t afford to abandon. 3
~ **" " *'"'"
i
@mi- .- . - . . - .M. ?. nat';Ti.r. . T I
w - - - . . . . . . . - - . - is . I ! B305190390 830Mi PDR
%dukke2-366 1
~
t Audience: (Applause and eone boon) f
. . E. Linn Drapers I think thIt cleo t avery utility in' tie l coultry PhiI Donahue: To which Richard Udell, Nuclear Safety Analyist *for would cry trct tha chssput etcy tan prnvid) futxrn olictricity far its Cit luus Critical Maas Energy Projsct replies. i customers is uith the nuclasr pleet. M1:3 ceid that they rro not building, they are not ordering new nuclear plants because they are so Nkhard Udell: Wrung. Nuclear power is unsafe, too expensive. There hideously expensive to build and the utilities are in bad financial are seventw-four plants. Last year in 1981 according condition. In the long run even with the high first cost nuclear power to .: finished ti.ere were over 4000 mishaps In one year.to One a study we hundred is cheaper. But if you don't have the money if you're a utility In financial dif ficulty, the thing you forego no,w is the thing that is most' for:y of them, according to documents by the nuclear regulatory expensive. It does a great disservice to future rate payers in this roamission, were especially serious and it doesn't save us from OPEC. country not to be able to build nuclear plants.
of the oil that we get from foreign countries only 6% goes to on \ electricitylon.ly ransportat 6I. The Nuclear rest is power ornot it goes goingtotoother industries, relieve our dependence on Phil Donahue But there are a number of high payers in this country at foreign oil. In fact the thing that is going to save us is conservation , the moment who believe they are being victim $ sed by the service of the
.ind sol.o r.
utility companies that have to ratae sheir r4tes because
- of the exorbitant costs of the nuclear installation ~
Audiences l ( A pplause)I
- E. Linn Drapers When they really have to ra se.their rates is F. Linn Draper: But the documents that you quote s.y there are g when they don't have the nuclear plants ir. operation, when they have to 19,000 .svents in the last eleven years that have beei worth looking at. burn expensive oil, when they have to burn the fuels that are scarce.
T ha t is five a day and yet the nuclear plants have continued to operate, g tlw public health and safety has been protected. They produce Phil Donahue: .To which you would say? . electricity econoalcally. i 0" ""#** Phil Donahue: All right. E. Linn Draper: How can you say that nuclear plants are too- Richard Udella Let me esp. lain why. expensive and too unreliable to operate. Phil Donahue Briefly, please. 5 Audience: I want to challenge your statement about nuclear power being g$ tYa y $rdah, e chr- ! Richard Udell Nuclear power plante cost more than othet plants. It used to be ten years ago in the early 70's a quarter off a million I should say that there are several people in the dollars. It now costs two, three, four othr plants that are even morc Phil Donahus audiencewhohavebeenespeciallgaveaspecialinterest. million dollars. invited for our program in addition to Phil Donahue
/
tha regular ticketholders. You The nuclear industy wants you to know-d Audience: Nuclear is one half the expense of coal in the Chicago area. Richard Udell , Now this includes all of the expense of nuclear even shutting.down the . plant and deactiivating it. It includes everything: f u el-- Phil Donahue But the nuclear industry wantu you to know thapit's not One f aportant qualifier--- their fault that the cos,t ofs construction has increased. Richard Udell Richard Udell: That's a tenfold increase. Inflation didn't increase Audience: One half all over the United States it is 15Z lower than coal that 150 times that nuclear power plants did. 1501 figure is the and I got these statistics f rom the-- nuclear power plants. -
- Richard Udell': Let's look at the statistics, okay. Chicago is an Amelia Doherty Let,a talk ,about some of the hidden costs.
"! Important qualifier. There are a couple of areas in the country that Chicago, parts of Phil Donahue: Let,a get some women in this act.- Meet Amelia Doherty. have an unusually high de$endence on nuclear Florida parts of New Eng and'. Wron it power. rom on it aInd that isaveryseriousproblem.meansthatyouaredependent Mrs. Three Doherty lives Can M11e Island. at Two Hilethe you see Island. plantYou'reactuallytwomiles(re from your backyard? You two and a half alles f rom Three Mile Islt.nd and you actually when the Audiences (unintelligible) 'I scare came I understand you went out anu got yourself smart like I suess anybody would in a situation like that. You've come to the concluelop Phil Donahue: Hadas you will not deny that the cost of building these t ha t-- plants is considerably greater than originally estimated and if it's so ! econoalcal why have there been no plants started and even the,TVA hAs Amelia Doherty: Nuclear power is the safest energy that we have. Most !J decided not to complete any. of these people here I don't believe have looked at other energies to see how unsafe they are. If they did they would know that the residue ! Richard Udell: Nuclear power is the most expensive way to boil out ; and the ash f rom coal if it were regulated like nuclear power it would I water ever designed. have to be buried as low level wasta.
; E. Linn Draper: No, that is staply not true. Phil Donahue: Meet Kathy McCaughin. You also live in Three Mile i liw would you respond to that Mr You'll give Island. Did you 'put the kids in the car and all that?
Phil Donahue there are a number of plants in varying s. Draper?tates of completion for , us that Kathy McCaughin: Sure. Ran away. which construction has been entirely halted. j, e ve 1 (
- DONAHUE TRANSCRIPT #08302 Page - 2
- j. -
DONMiUE '11LAhSCRIPT #08302 Fage - 3 J
Phil Donahue And you backsd out of ths drivswsy. You htva a nica Amelia Doh nty: Why d a't thsy? nuclear f amily with sts and junter and a dog Audianc= I think the avstridir iccue to rad 19tica. I do*'t cits if Kathy McCaughin: At that time it van a nuclear family Itea not . sow . nuclear overismoreexpensivefhancoalorsolar over. The fact is that nuc ear plants create immense quantittee of ra ioactive long Phil Donabue: As ou can see we're going to have an awful lot of folks last(ng poisons. Radiation causes cancer-get in this thing ut you had the n / and backing out--what were you thightmare ing? then of getting in the car Audiences (Applause) Kathy McCaughtn: That's not had, that's have. That is present tense. Audience: Radiation causes leukemia, it causes b1' th' r defects, it causes I have the nightmare. When the accident happened unfortunately like genetic diseases ~ most of the people in the area I left too late. We didn't leave until Friday. That is because of the horrible-- , Phil Donahue So does a television set, so does - Phil Donahue The accident was when? Audience: No, not the same longlasting stuff. The radiation from nuclear power and f roe atomic bombs has already killed thousands of Kath McCaughin: The eleases were on Wednesday ni ht. . We all stayed people. This new hook KILLING OUR O W really po9ueents it. and hen we lef t to e ourselves safe and six son hs later found out , that we left two days too late. That has to do with - Phil Donahue All right. Sir. Briefly. l E. Linn Draper Two days late for what? Audience: Well, you said that nuclear over causes cancer ahd:that but <
""*
- O M Kathy McCaughinr We don't know. . M9 Amelia Doherty: How do you knoiv it's too late then? Phil Donahue: Good point.
Kathy McCaughing I think this is a very important issue - Auplence I think it's 1 think about what l we re dolng today but we M orta.nt inkthat we not on1 bout the future and not just our Anella Doherty I lef t too bur I came back and studied. - generation but our grandchildren. Kathy McCaughin: So did I. We started this shew---you started the sh w Phil Donahue But the nuclear industry wants you to know that they are with nobody died at Three Mile Is!'and. I resent that, I hear it , thinking about our future and that many of the people that are running everywhere I go, particularly from my industry friends. . around saying "the sky is falling, the sky is falling" are shortsighted, don't appreciate the contribution economic as well as*in terms of gover i Phil Donahue: Why do you resent it?. that nuclear can make, certainly in the case of getting separated cros i OPEC and all the other good things that will secrue. i Kathy McCaughin: I resent it because there are meters at that plant and those meters peaked. In other words, they went as f ar as the could go Audience: Well, all I can say is that when you have something that has on the scale. We may have received that or we may have recei ed five so much potential for violence like it does have - times that or , ten times that.
' Phi Donahue But that's what they said about the DC3. It will seat Phil Donahue: So you want to say nobody died at Three Mile Island yet. fourteen people and what if it crashes.
i Kath McCao hin: Nobody died yet. Okay. I have a fifteen year old I'm Amelia Doherty: What type of violence are you talking about? I deep y wort ed' about. l Audience: There is a difference in this. Phil Donahue: Do you see physical manifestations? Phil Donahue What? , Kathy McCaughtn Not yet. It has only been three years. Amelia Doherty: What kind of violence? Phil Donahue: You're worried about genetic damage, etc.? , Phil Donahue: You think this is different? h Kathy McCaughin: I have a daughter who was ;oing into puberty at the tine of the accident and I have no idea what that did to her. i Audiences I think it's different. . Amelia Doherty: I have six children and two grandchildren. Phil Donahue Yes. Kathy McCaughtn I have a concern
- Audience: I think we are thinking about the future with nuclear power.
Phil Donahue She's not worried. Mrs. McCaughin, could you' sell your er we house or did you. Audience: We're having nuclear accidents when the medical profession Kathy McCau8 h in: Yes
- I have. I have sold a house strice Three Mile ! and the peo le out in the ublic we are not ready to handle those Tuland. It was onit the nuclear acc dents. We don t know how to take care of these people or had market been onalmost the mara et ear and a halfwhen At the time I buu ht the house two months we bought it. what to do for them. We are not prepared for nuclear energy.
Iw 11 not sa that that is a part of the accident. We have a serious j economic prob em. I'm ten miles away; I have friends that are two miles
- away and would give their houses away and can't get rid of them. ir e DONAHUE TRANSCRIPT #08302 Page - 4 DONAHug TRANSCRIPT #08302 Page - 5
._ - _ _ _ _ _ _ . - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ . _ _ _ - _ _ _ = _ _ _ _- - _- - _______-__ _ ._
I Phii Donahue: Let me just show you a map which gives you some idea af win't be ony risks. where the nuclear plants are lecated in the Unita.d States and it.will
help you. All the d2ts represent the placsment af a nuclser facility Richard Uds11 Hald om a cinuts', what kint af ritka cre us talking -
a n.: ubviously with thi p?pulation aktwid ecstwtrd mort af the glcats are aboutt dallarly located. services Illinois--Commonwealth our own station here and Edison environs inci is dentia ly the I think proud usliity that nuclear generatin E. Linn Drapers The risk of not opening the plant on time. of the tact that it is one, he if not theleadingso,uldalsosayfortge j g.uhlically neld utility in t country. We s
- r. c..r.1 t hat a uumber of the bigshots in the financial world.have raised Richard Ud' ell: We're talkipg about risks of thousands of deaths from a s o. eyebrows al.out the efficiency of this particular company policy in nuclear plant accident ,
terms of its future financial well-being. Who is going to pay for the Kathy McCaughin Hundred of thousands. insurance on these plants? E. Linn Drapers I thought we were talking about the financial Kathy McCaughin: The citizens aret We're talking about nuclear risks. That was the question. warsare. If nuclear plants are as safe as they would have us believe Richard Ude11: Let's talk about all the risks. Audience: i then why in every hdmebwners policy is there a nuclear exclusion clause. E. Lina Draper let's dal 4 You're covered for earthquakes but you're not covered if anything i happens because of a nuclear accident and they legislated the Price Richard Ude11: If you want to talk about risks you have to talk about An3erson Act to limit liability to a matter or million of dollars when everything. Earlier we mentioned that there vers over 19,000 accidents
.an accident could cost billions of dollars. in an eleven year period--
Phil Donahue: Mr. Draper, sir. E. Linn Draper And no fatalities. E. Linn Draper The reason that you aren,t covered in your homeowners policy is because of the insurance that exists on the units. Richard Udellt ---and a new study by the government shows that one f Not only does the insurance exist-- hundred sixty-nine of them were near missers, precursors to a core melt- ' down. Audience: (Ohl) E. Linn Drapers Not a meltdown; fuel damage. ! E. Linn Draper: You don't have to show- - Audiences Con Edison is allowed to base its profits as a percentage of j the amount, of capital not only invested-~ j Audience: The is $%0 million and the accident could be in the tens of i billions of dollars. . Phil Donahue As it true of most utilities. . i Kathy McCaughin Just look at Three Mile Island. We have no idea in Audiences --but borrowed and by building a more capital. intensive i tha world how we are going to clean that mess up. The utility is nuclear plant - j epsoding all this time in Washington crying and crying. Phi { Donahue They are allowed then to make more money. . E. Linn Draper: But you don't think your homeowners policy . . thould cover that do you. Audience: To make morg money to generate the same amount of - it . '; Kathy McCaughin: If in fact I had $580 left and not come back they would milltor of that I pay as a E. Linn Drapers It's not a valid point. . h<sve been fine but I would not. ! taxpayer. Ipavetopaytoblowmyselfup. Phil Donahue Mr. Draper, that's a fact. As long as they public Phil Donahue: Con Ed may not be able to open LaSalle on target and the utilities commissions of states determine the profit permission for
- i. utilities on the basis of capital investeent you are always going to be 1 est imate of the company le that it could cost as auch $600.000 a day rewarded by capital investments--
just for the delay. Why would a smart businessaan like yourself want to even set yourself up for a kind of business disaster? E. Linn Draper: That's exactly wrong. .
- E. Linn Draper: Because people in the utility industry believe Phil Donahue: Explain to me.
i they have an obligation to supply electricity as cheaply as possible and j in the long run--- E. Linn Draper: Because you borrow money or sell stock at a rate that costs you more than you get back f rom the rate payers. So every Audience: (Murmuring) time you build anything you lose more money.
--in the long run nuclear power will do exactly hav. the opportunity to make more money because E. Linn Draper: Phil the Donahue And l
that. rules allow-- you I Amtl enc e Why do we pay for construction work in progress 1 E. Linn Draper You lose money because the stocks are selling E. Linn Draper If you want the utilities to take a posture at r below book value. which they are not at risk and you don't have the opportunity to have th.se costs go up they can take a strategy that is risk free. They will Phil Donahue: All right. huild oil firing plants. We know we can get those on line. We 11 burn , 1 expensive fuel tros abroad and your electric rates will go up but there E. Linn Draper: That's what's the probi g with utilities. I f i DONAHUE TRANSCRIPT #08302 Page - 6 ' DONAHUE TRANSCgIPT #08302 Page - 7 i
g s
! Phil Donahue: Clay, let me jutt try ons nore question and evnrybod E. Linn 'Driper Of couros it's not tetelly cefs. N thing ic
, pst stay calm for a escond. Civsn Three Hile Island--lat c fcr t 2 totally cefa.
e nameut put aside all tha smotion en this thing and giva you your dum cud you're clearly an honesc guy who wants to make a living and all those . Phil Donahue Yes, ma'am. other good things and we certainly want to be independent and all that. Given Three Mile Island the enormous delay of fixing it the enormous costs that is accrued to those who are responsible for Its construction Audience: Okay, first of all, hopefully I will not get booed but I do
.ind liable f or any potential damage, why would you set yourself up for not believe it a wrong for the companies to want to make some, money.
this many times over at other plants like this around the country. It Audiences (Applause) looks like we're always on the edge of this kind of public relations y nightmare. Audiences That's the capitalintic way and I'm for that. MIIe IslandSosowhat E. Linn Draper Three thatwewun'y tr to do isBut learn Phil Donahue Are you confidant that the blue suits in all those air i t recur. letfrom the lesson me reiterate at motive the conditioned offices high up in the high rises of office buildings of If we utilit com that don, dido t they are do you want to trust them for building want nuclear plants is to make cheap electricity.to make electricity tcheaply have there withtheco$ antes,businessmenthatlective wisdom of decidin5 what Is in ou are alternatives the financial exposere that nuclear does. Oil plants for example. We interests. These are the same people who predicted certain costs for don't build them because we want to provide customers electricity as , nuclear facilities that have been wrong by 600% and 7001. cheaply as possible. Audience: What if the utilities go bankrupt when the problems have to Audience: I would like to know is what are the alternatives? What is the cost of the alternatives and what are the long range safety plants? faced and they are,not there anymore? The same kinds of things for nuclear power and I would like to hear it without people just shouting. E. Linn Draper: Well, we-- Audience: We live, injZion Illinois, which has got the two largest Phil Donahue Want to take your first swlng at that? Mr. Udell, sir. reactors in Illinois which,are run by the largest utility in 1111nois e Richardt Udell: FJrst the long term implications among others is of alwe}r,e Commonwealth Edison wh runs utility in the counEry.ich more radioactive vastes which piling up-an nuclear reactors than any other
- So f rom experience base -in theory they have .
i I the greatest experience in all. I would like to difier with a few E. Linn Draper: She wants to hear about the alternatives.
! points that have been'made. First of all. there has r:ow been a death attril ned to nuclear power. The Canadian goverosent has recognized and Richard Udells ---millions of gallons of that. The alternative which paid benefits to the family of a nuclear power plant worker. This you don't hear about--one reason you don't hear about them is because occured approximately three months ago. I was in Winnipeg and it was in money isn't going into them. The new Reagan budget has 871 of it that the papers. 1s not going to the military and the Department of Energy going to nuclear power fission and fusion. The conservation budget -
I Pht! Doaahues Running out of time. . E. Linn Draper: That has nothing to do with it. Audience: Okay, that's number one. There has been a deatis attributed. 3 Number two, - Nichard Udells --let me finish the sentence just for a second. E. Linn Draper: You know that simply paying the c141m doesn't Kathy McCaughin; It has everything to' do with it. nican the death occured that way. Richard Udall: Every part of the budget of this country that was moing Audience: They acknowledged the death. to alternatives, even to oil and Ass is being cut and given to nuclear power. If there is one dif ference between the Reagan Administration and Audience: Number two. contrary to what this lady has said back there the one that came before it is that while the Carter Administration was" when she gave her statistics at the time Three Mile Island occured that somewhat committed to developing nuclear power the Reagan Administration a accident really should have occured in my town, the only city in the is seeking to make us dependent on it and that's why you don't hear country with a nuclear power plant within the city limits. We had at about the alternatives. I the time at Zion one and two reactors about seventy-five violations
.w.. t u t each reactor. Commonwealth Edison has paid hundreds of Phil Donahue Let me just introduce three other folks here. You're si..m ands of dollars in fines which again the rate payers really pay at Sharon Marello. You're a former Zack employeq. Meaning?
she end. h ' Sharon Marello: I worked in documentation department at Zack Co. and
- Audience: Abs olut ely . they are a subcontractor for LaSalle nuclear gite. .
i Audience: But we have paid--- Phil Donahue What does Zack provide? r thy Hecaughtn: The taxpayer always pays. Sharon Harello H-back system, heating, ventilating, air conditioning.
....n e nce : Hut we had a worker up there in the past c.ouple of months Fhil Donahue You say you're a former. What happened?
4..esve several lifetime dosages for which Commonwealth Edison is being eined $100,000. The point is this: there are s.any problems with Sharon'Harello: When we had seen all the problems that the company had nuclear power. It is not totally safe and what somebody said for the--- with the documentation. There was a lot on it that was way out of line. My supervisor, which was at the time Mr. Howard made allegations to Consumers Power which .is up in MidlanbMuclear site and within a week we were all fired. i DONAHUE TRANSCRIPT #08302 Page.- 8 DONAHUE TRANSCRIPT #08302 Page - 9 1 .
Terry Howarad Absolutely trus. We idIntifisd in ptrticular thres Richard Udell Nuclear bombs. . sites here la Illinois. Whit its wsre ccac2rned la thstr tsctrdW Phil Dsnahut: - -wi es11 the:s bombs hars in Chicag2. Now if we there Phil Donahue Explain it so that a layman understands it. is gargraphicall in this country a number of pitcss trith this itind of saterial who is andling this material? What are ti.e politics of the Terry Howard: That is the verification that the materials that they put this materialf And does it enhance the chances of a [ersonhandlinfagaholdofthismaterialandcallingup-errorist gett 10 those plants is actually what they say they are. E. Linn Draper: You should point out that there are no such Pht! Donahue We're not talking about nuclear materials; we're talking reactors currently in operation. about the ventilation and other ancillary equipment that accomodates the nuclear--- Phil DonsMas Okay, and where will 1111 acts send its waste? And what
*"*' ** """ I * **"" E E *
- Terry Howard We're talking about the construction material, yes. $[I"I Phil Donahue All right. f Audiences (We are)
Terry Howard: And ist fpet this plant LaSalle did say that the materials l Phil Donahue: And how much are we taking? . in that plant were safe and we took that issue and said they weren't i safe and you better not get this out that it is and in two weeks we were Audience: How about the midwest contact?
- gina.
Phil Donahue And just because it's new does that mean it's bad. Phil Donahue: What was unsafe about it? That's what they said "about aviation the steam engine and ust about . Audience: They said that they had assurances that it was safe, that the caterial that was actually in there was the material. We did not have
'h yok u - -
tha documents for it and we pointed this out to them. ***** STATION BRfAK****** Phil Donahue: Let me just take you to school here for just a second.
~
Sharon Marello: Any material that is used in the nuclear site has to be documented from the original point all the way through fabrication
- We hope we can make some sense in this and we appreciate very much the no pun, that you bring into this discussion. First of all you Phil Donahue: Right. enerky,knowthatthereareeighty-threecuclearreactorslicensedInthe shou d Sharon Marello: And in the papers at Zack there was all kin ds of United States. I think we can argue about how many there ar operating probless with so itthem and they could not actually trace down all this ,a at f proj cap i e i sat gyautd mag
"' *erial
' "I******g**leav e a big question.in your mind as to whether it INO. gut we have not started a nuclear facility, in terms of
[ Phil Donahue: All right, but we seay have just a faultylor perhaps not construction since whent l E.ginnDraper: Oh, about 1977 was the last time. altogether precise reporting system. Sharon Harellos' That's very possible but if they don't have the Phil Donahue: Why?
- Jocumentation on this now it has to be checked out because of the fact that the tests aren't done on the material. If they were the documents E. Linn Draper
- I think we talked just briefly about that were lost so we don't know. earlier. It had to do with the financial condition of the electric utilities.
e>hil Donahue: De got to break here. Let's see if we understan'd our Jeleuma here. We do have certainly energy needs in the future. We are Phil Donahue It also has to do with a' business decisjon which says, not altogether comfortable with our dependence on OPEC and the amount of hey, man, do we want to get ourselves in-- energy resource that we get from outs 13e this country. What are the c msequences of the multi-billion domestic nuclear industry? Does the E. Linn Draperi If you don't have the money you don't have the MC really work and how about the povernment monitoring system and h w w h are we funding it? Would you buy a house at Three Mlle Island or most expensive thing. You do the best you can with what you have and
.a Zion? And if you wouldn't then isn't it a little hypocritical to that happens not to be nuclear if you don't have money.
. rand up and say well let's give them a chance? Are businessmen making Richard Udell Also something you can't face up to.
.u c s:. inns about wh at kind of racilities will be generating our energy in I L.
(usure.indlet'sget this in. Plutonium is apparently also baing mcJ or 1s---isn t C1 nch River--- , . E. Linn Drapers If you don't have the money you don't buy it. Richard udell: Clinch River is a breeder reactor that would breed 1 McCaughing It also has to do with an enlightened public that the oggg plusvutum, make more than it uses of that fuel. Plutonium has a life of i Kath{tf was finally forced to talk about things in nominal generation o electr city. about a quarter of a million years. E. Linn Drapers I don't think you can point to a single case at Phil Donsihue Pluton 1ue also can be converted into nuclear detonation which a reactor that was coateeplated went away because of public f or-- concern. They went away because the utilities can't afford to pay for them. t i. DONAMUE TRANSCRIPT #03302 Page 11 DONAHUE 1RANSCRIPT #03302 Page - 10
~
+
Audieness I d2n't ses how Kathy McCrughin: I think it has a great deel to da with that* how thxt youthtt wh1rn cro thtreliberty ttka the is suchtoa g(rect rick, ks,1sto a r<ccount absolutely. . Potsntial all ths livas rick,fo so many perpla. Audience: I want to get back if we can to the health issue surrounding E. Linn Dra Do you think it's a l THi. I lived in Pennsylvania during that time the western part of the minerinth$er: s country every other day! Irest riskthat's think to kill aa great coal' risk. state, and I've been following the reports and,the good work being done i ^ by the Pennsylvania Department of Health. They have a leading Audience: How many coal miners could be killed? * ' Epidentlogist who has shown that there have been no ef fects to this point on infant mortality rates. As a matter of fact they went down in E. Linn Draper: Those are real deaths, not something that might the year af ter TMI. They are following it closely. I think we're happen. talking about a lot of fear, we're implanting fear. There doesn't seem Audience: If this would happen in a nuclear plant how many people could to be a reason for it.
- be killed?
t Phil Donahue: Kind of a buzz word and uninformed people set hysterical ' ,; and that's one of the problems.' Kathy McCaughin: One of the botton lines on this 1seue fram my perspective at Three Mile Island is that it always comes back te the Audience: It's very' easy to frighten people. It's harder to bring them same question anytime there is a nuclear discussloa and that is the , { i back from their fear
- economica of nuclear power is always discussed well ahead of the health l!
and safety and it aivays will be because that is the nature of business. Phil Donahue: Sir.
- I Tom Devine
- I have a challenge for Mr. Draper. I'm a lawyer who
- h ""ha bne d of w a s 8 a$t he $1 .
represents whistle blowers from the nuclear industry. Every one of our l q
- cllents has been vindicated on their charges. Every one.of.them has i Richard Udell: Let's talk about the what is. Let's talk about some of been fired f rom their plants and branded as anti-nuclear communist I the accidents.
puppets. I would like to challenge Mr. Draper to start a campaign I Excuse me, Hr. Udell, but here f rom the Mass Energy--the within the nuclear industry to listen to whistle blowers instead of . Phil Donahue caearing them, firing them and blacklisting them. Critical Mass report the organization which is represented by Mr. Udell I provided for us the followingThese are statistics with which 1981 nuclear piantI'm sure stets. safety Mr. Draper 4 000 Audiences (Light applause) t may take exception. accidents is your own figure of which you say more than one hundred,were ' E. Linn Draper: I,e not aware that people have been b'randed consunist especially serious. 131 due to construction errors, 191 due to human puppets because they are whistle blowers. It seems to me that if there error and with are le itimate concerns they ou to be fully ventilated. An our minds, 621thedueZack report fromf ailure. to equipment these former Of the emplo(ees seven y-four recently reactors in investggation should be made anghtwe ought to clean up whatever is wrong operating with stsian generators forty-one have leaks, it is four yourreacto's view or v has been branded as a r lit $'$ ibry is the result of your own survey. Fourteen of the seventge vessel in uppe a . have what are called brittle reactor vesaels. This which the core is placed and following prolonged use apparently the is t
;udience: er with the obvious metallurgists are telling us'that they become brittle and can crack like tar en rgyI would like to of what percent ask Mr. Drabudget is going into kotential hi of glass if that happens you get what is called a meltdown. The July NRC development of solar energy? your R&D study found one hundred sixty-nine accidents between sixty-nine and seventy-nine that could have resulted in a meltdown.
E. Linn Draper: Of whose R&D budget? The reason for.that is the very careful o events. We've had one hundred sixty-nine things that were suatence.. Your utility.s. E. Linn Draker: reporting th ught to be important and nothing happened. N lives have been lost. r; . 1. sun Draper: My utility about a third of our R&D budget gc.es Therefore, they should not be held accountable aar what I call alternative technologies. Not all solar but some wind, Kathy McCaughin: because they have confessed their mistakes. w.c at that sort of thing. About one third goes for load, management
- and : he remaining one third goes for fairly conventional things. Phil Donahoe: And we'll be back in just a moment.
Audience: My question--
***** STATION BREAK *****
E. Linn Draper: Most people would lump the alternatiyas together ., Those dots represent the nuclear facilities placed in the as solar. Phil Donahue United States, a total of eighty-three. Yes, sir. Audiences My question would be solar. ' Audience: 1 think I look into this dimension of nuclear waste more. I E. Linn Draper: A third.
- live near Shef field, , Illinois, which is right near one of f amous nuclear t this -
dump sites which happens to be leaking onto private propert tise. When we talked about cost Mr. Draper keeps talking a Kathy McCaughin: A better question is how much of our dollars, our tax t the cost dollars willfully and generously given to our federal government are but how about the cost of the tax burdens on the people of devaluation.
, being used for solar and how much are being used for nuclear--- I happen to be a farmer myself and its devaluing our property along witt the health consequences and the tax burden of the whole nuclear waste---
Richard Udell Only a couple of percent. Phil Donahue Yeah. ,
~
o , DONAHUE MANSCRIPT #08302 Page - D DONAHUE TRANSCRIPT #08302 Page - 12 ,
I - me p - -. .- . j Pht! Donahus: What would you do about wane s It's hard to imagins somebody buy 1 g your propsrty and thet t Phil Dunahus N2, I's nat at all concerned & bout that. knoutng that thsre is a nuclogr drap Edjacent to t. Audiance: Audience: I live in sureau County which happens to be Richard Ude11: You should bel You should be very concerne'd about it! une of the That's best rifht.f are and in the world-- Let me say something, please. I'm a E. Linn Draper: There isn't any doubt about it. Whatever coats Audiences Hold on just a minute.in the general sense anymore than I'm concerned not concerned about the f actabout it that driving here this mornia rive cars were beside the are associated with nuclear power should behat aidisin absolutely the cost ofcorrect. e it but they fixed their generating electricity at a nuclear plant. road with flat tires. They nt were concerned ue cor.cerned about it we're pola is of the course Ic is as safe as . On the sub ect of nuclear waste and on the process of II8C Lif Now and the that why industry is is,. Concern Audience: all conc's.erned,In 1979 yms eople, do you remember when Indiana and Ohio reprocessing spent fu 1, the last coar.arcial o ration was in West down in 1972. hey left behind 600,000 is built in. T y ha no ener y. Their hospitals had no heat. aalley. New York which closedIt's going to cost $1 billion to clean up' had to close shop. ere. Keep it n sind. One more thin as lon gallons We had nuclear power Phil,youbrought,upaveryimportantthgogandgas and the of high evel nuclear waste. industry is looking to the State of New York and the . Icannot have let thisit eike. get away. federal government o pay for that burden. That's one more example.
- Phil Douhues The longer you speak the less'Itkely it is others will Aewlia Doherty: Phil, don't these people want to be esiets inde ndent. '
What are they going to use in the meantiae while they are evelop$ng have a chance. other energies. Audience: Good. Kathy McCaughing Conservation. Audiences (goo) Phil Donahue: Over here, please. ~ Xathy McCaughin: Typical industry response. Audience: Okay, she was saying something about putt 1ng fear into This happens to be something I think both sides will a ree people's minds. I think about the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki' Audience ou a wcaderful list of questions before the last reak. the long tera effects, and I as really frightened. to. Phil gave ou on the other side this He asked you a et of questions and many ofPlease, peop e, do yourselves a fa,vor Audience: (Applause) side, can respond emotionally. the facts. Phil is doing l and get the answers to those questions, get Audience: We keep talklog about costs and we're not concerned about the you a favor today. l i human problems that are going to exist free generation to generation. Tell me what will hap en if we don't, adopt the kind Phil Donahue: of-what's your biggest concern. 3r afly. w lia Doherty: Nuclear power has nothing to do with nuclear bombs. itself Phil Donahue: Yr . but Mr. Draper also wants you to know that the Audience M 'blamest concern is that when this country does getwhen there is Japanese are in t e forefront in their application of nuclear--- turned arou anfit has to work with obsolete equipment a solog to run no power for us because I'moffrom the lack coal of all because country that is no wa ich and there I would is C. Linn Draper: They sure are. out. Coal for et it. Itke to live w h that again. I cannot see why nuclear power rhi i Donahue: --energy for their-- all over this world, with our technology all over this world, why this A country is not going to be ready for an industrial-
. 8. inn praper: Japanese, French. most of the develo ed
..it ries in t.he world have a major cousitment to nuc ear power. Kathy McCaughin: That's scary.
PioI Donahue: But Mr. Udell wants you to know that the French and the Phil Donahue This gentleman here with the fare wants you to know that Bsit tah are the same people who gave us the Concorde. you didnt' answer the question about waste.
' There are many forms now which vaste can be 8 C 8 Pe#e ute Geir Mg ; Audience: About the waste.
no icNind Ne treated. It has been treated. It has been buried in Canada. l Richard Udella That's complete 1'y untrue, Aa.ella Doherty: I have no big money behind me. R 8 8 Pl an to continue . Kathy McCaughin Tell us about it. t Ilbeour i noenff ' Richard Udell: That is incorrect. Phil Donahue: Hand her the aike. You'll stand please. Landfills twenty feet under the ground leaking onto property Audietsce: I'm redily inni Now is that the best technology that we have. Aud:ence stawnentwhenyousai$oin behin Ever once in wi h all t$e monetoresOndtothebekus.ngofyour Audience: In the city of Chicago there are chemical dumps, there is al' awhile I wonder if the anti-nuclear peopt have oil mowey be ind them so , that when the oil runs out and we are not prepared with nuclear sorts of wastes. ei well, you see how ridiculous it sounded when you asked, your Is that your answerf Is that the responsible easwerf Aud!*mca DOMAMUE TRANSCg!PT #03302 Fase - 15 DONAHUE TEANSCRIPT #08302 Fase - 14 '
~
i
I E. 1. inn Draper: Of course not. There is good technology. E. Lima Rrapers Imok at a cemitsr emeopla. Lack what '--- " - l at the plent me:r Roche. tar. N rs was a serieme selfenstles med'.d ? - - - ip Audience: That is exsetly my poixt. everybody had learned what to de and the systems yoghed, ;- .
. .i
- t Phil Donahue: le back ta jisst a moeemt. Phil Donahue: One other point that shans14 he ende to there le en aufel
!1 lot of power within the nuclear Robby. We are talklag abent seen '
Il
;g ese** STATION BREAK ***** gigantic corporattees eene of when proudly openser their woest and'
- cars. Se it l '
Phil Donahue: In the hope of makin doesn't mesa that because they are big theyservicesonthisprogramwithoetwhichImigetbepar are necesee 1:1 Peablic Point has to be made they've got the ear of the Ceagrosamea a let faster
. Citizens i' bothering you? Critical Mass Energy Project, sir. Nuclear Safety Anal your briefest What speech.yist, is thancollection of views.
the folks who are here Richard protesttag.Udell,g sense out of clearly I 4
! g Audiences (Applause) '
! Richard Udell: The safety of operating plants first and foremost. What us did in this book that is just coming out now---yons can order it Phil Denshines And there is momew la this. We al fee .I i 1 uriting to us la Washington--is it esplains that there were over { imb residents having and madechairess their commiteest, of the board uno are sim, eight, ' ten,out reb on twelve have yearsutility the nec age ans 5eer
- i. mishaps last year. 'Oder a hundred of them were especially serious. The their esse won t allow thes m ,- .
lants that we are operating ta this country today are potential time g p>oeba. Esthy McCanschia: There is a tremendeiss double.Itandard-Phil Donahue Yons have an NRC which is oversee 1ag this. E. Line Drapers If the nuclear ladust as yons sa roughshed over the coisatry I don't th E we weis14 bcan rue the dirth of t ve seem 4 kichard Ude11: The government is not doing an adequate job of orders for nuclear plaats we've had in the last five years. j protecting the public. h re are eeny prettees that have surfaced. The l Indostry has not learned its lessoa and these accidents are reocciating Phil nh=== But we haven't begina constrecties en ene since 1976. cach yeer. l E. Lima Draper, Senior Vice President, Culf States a Eachy McCaisshist h re is a double standard - d Phil Donahue Util: ties. E. Lima Draper: Tbst's the point. We are clearly set ramalag '
- nucleaar power down people's threats.
j E. Linn Draper: I think that it would be tremendous mistake to . 4 -
.baJonoursecondmostimportantsourceofgeneratingelectricitb.
Sure, the technology has had and will continue to have problems, t if l Esthy McCaughts: I'm held acceenstable for my personal life. The risk ! inflicted by nuclear power when that error---te say that nothtag has gu compare nuclear tants to the alternative ways to do the same job g
, happened yet, we've been on the verge. Bow lucky can we be? -
j n..wlymakeelectric$ty.feI* a thtak e in any e dispassionate ves, he wastes evaluation are beatga yons'Il as Anadience: las'ats becaicae this l a4 .I nt e -
- indisstry isWe haven't based begun coestrinction on assumptions, not f act. on Allthese t heingh the WBC rep 4
AuJ6cneet (Murmurtag) .
. the Safety Commissten, everythlag te engineerlag, destgelag. ~
E Lima Dryer Yeas're assuntag accidents that we boven't hadt
, E. Linn Drapers --and the econoelce are better than the
' " " ' " " *
- Audiences Take fato perspective the daenge does by your admissioe---
Audience: Realistically it appears thag we have nuclear.eaerty and it's E. Lian Draper Ubich damage? The hypothetical daeame? i .us irportant source of energy. Shoisten t our anti-ainclear af rorts be Jevoted to saf'aty measures, naving Mr. Udell and Mr. Draper get
- Anadiences No. yoner waste---I'm a biologist, sir, and I went to speak to together. Mr. tide 11 telling Mr. Draper what we cons 1d do to make our you aboent scientific f acet l's not tasalag abaist seen eptiees and I'm nuclear plaats safer.
not talklag abenst - I' I AuJ t enc e: (Applause) Phil Denshise: Okay yons'11 mar om o me. N last thtag I weeg to de le l ' dichard Udells Our organisation deals regularly with the Nuclear interrupt a biologis,t. We wl11 he back La jinst a moment. I e really i Regulatory Commission. We try to cell their attention to problees. We sorry. *j tu en unsuccessful in convincing them that sees problems need , l ,,,, ,,,,, Amelia Doherty: Phil Domshues Yois'11 agree with we I thienk. Mr. Draper, that la the event of a meltdown yons we got to have evacenation of the ares. t i
- ; there has been noYois've big problems.said all these They accidents have been have hajpened pad yet containe
- j E. Lien Drapers Sure. j i uschard Udell There have been big problems. Last year alone-i Au lla Doherty: But they've been handled. Phil how and Donahue Are do I know ween yons l's really backlassatisfied oint of mythel pa are driveway pr te de thatt I'm not goin Sred Rich.ard Ude11: One little example. As accident at a brand new' reactor to run f ato all those other cars Eacked est of their drivonssys into the ,
, l I
! i in Tennessee 110 000 of radioactive coolant leaked. Elaht workers were str.ets and into the intersections--- - ' l contaminated. T$e worker that did it it was his first day on the job
- and he wasn't adequately trained. And even an indisstry report -
.s .
4 1I i f I * . d nnesanmur 1RauSCt1FT #03302 Fase - 16 DOMAIRE 1eameratFT #00302 Page - 17
'i; i
, , , - - - , .,e , - - . - - , . - - , . _ - - - ., ,, - . , - , _
- -- -- --- -, = ,
E. Linn Drapers Pht! I can dercribe to you the plce far cay Kcthy McCaughts: If we had cvailt.b12 the r:cources from the f:dercl given plaat but 1 thi$k your rslitnce es a citisaa em my infarmation g rve rnment--
; should come f rom confidence that you have in the Nuclear Regulatory e Com.nission. Audiences Te s leportant to reelise that the NRC has complicity with l CommonwealtL Edison and the Zack Company for instance in hidf ag some 1 Pl.11 Douahues Are you confident? very bad defects in quality assurasce documents at that lant. Now what I think is important to remember here is that they are e owing a lot of k60 plants
- p Iwh on s oY r[a t Efe y f u lear c o o h t ads et eht bu lbnY
' Phil Donahue: Briefly, sir.
Audience: I just have a real concern that we are sitting on- ' . Audience: Yes. You've asked the question several times Ph!! what's E. Linn Draper-. I can't hear
- I" routfneldone with high levent radioactive waste. The Frencb have,been Pl.11 Donahue: Just one second.
i a L 8C We a'e geveloped and have sold to other. countries. dis osing of suc Audience: I just have a real concern that we ars sitting on a time bomb Phil Donahue
.n.d that people f rom Commonwealth Edison are waiting until there is an ' You're satisfied that we are able to do this without--
acc Jent first then react instead of the other way around. E. Lit.n Draper Absolutely. AuJ 6.:nc e : (Applause) i Phil Donahue And there's nto date going to unearth anything? going to be a bu11 doser at ,some future ec s. hard Udell: Phil, how many people here have ever. heard of this* E. Lina Draper: No. ,
.d s ..ae e. Hr. Draper, has your company attempted to " send out a
...c t sonnaire or take a survey of the customer to see what they prefer? Richard Ude11: Unt rue.
teen. D r.s pe r : Yeah and you're not going to like the answer I scellng f rom tbe tone of your question. In the Baton Rouge area Audience: I have very deep concern for this naturally eith children and e ,. . . .. all that but my children are never even going to make it there. The
. .< s . uur nuclear plant is, 781 of the people favor nuclear power. finances toda and ever thing we're not gain to make it there. We're st..s a.y McCaughin: At Three Mile Island we had a referendum $snd three not don'tgoing knowtohow--
(ave food fecause the electricaf prices keep going up. I co.n.iies voted on whether or not they wanted Three Mlle Island reopened ' auJ shey all voted no. E. buildLinn Draper: nuclear The way to bring electric prices down is to plants. Phil Donahue When you - Audience: I'm not even worrying about a meltdown because we'll never Kathy McCaughtn I don't think it will have any effect on the utility ke it. or the NRC. Audience Are we burying other countries wastes too? - Phat Donahue: Mrs. McCaughin when you and yoru fastly backed out of the Jrivew.sy you actually have been there. Where did you go? Phil Donahue: Are we accepting weste f rom other countries? K.. thy McCaughtn: I went away for the weekend which we were E. Linn Drapers No, we are not. Tbcu ue left a daughter for ten days at my nother's and thaf.oing awaf. is abou I sewnty-five m$les away. Phil Donahue: Sir, briefly. Audience: A lot of emotion has come across here. Why can't we just have a straight comparison between nuclear power and 'the alternative. Audience: Okay, Phil what I started to say awhile ago that we worry about all this money (eing spent for safety but what about everyday when we go out in our car. How much money-- E. Linn Draper: You bet. Compare the safety, compare the cronunics, compare the environmental impact and nuclear plants will look K a the ti., McCaughin: Tha t is an individual decision. That is not taking gouJ. out state of Pennsylvania. Audience: Is it possible for a professional terrorist to destroy a Amelis Doherty: It's going to be an individual decistors when you can't p t .in t .snd if so how many people would dief , go to work too. Richard Udella Yes, it is. Audience: I have a consent for Mr. Draper. I think that Three Mlle - Island-- you said you learned f rom your alstake with Three Mlle Island. E. Lims Draper: It's possible for a professional terrorist to do I think that was too blg a mistake to make. Jarn ne.sr anything. - E. Linn doubt Drapers about it. It was certainly a costly afstake, there is no - Audience: I have challenge to all the anti-nuclear pro-solar people. Why Jan't 'you funnel all your energy instead of tryIng to tear down the nuclear industry and build up the solar energy and make it a reality. ,,, f
\
~ ~
DONAHUE TRANSCRIPT #0g302 Fase - 18 DONAHUE TRANSCRIFT #08302 Fase.- 19 ,
e f p
, s-Audiences (Applause) ,
j Kathy McCaughin: Why were there 4000 accidents?
***** STATION BREAK *****
Phil Donahue: Well, we didn't say we were going to solve all the problems but it's your countn. You've got eightethree plants now licensed. What are the questions you want to askT When was the last
- time you were at a public utility hearing? Will your rate go up? Is it true that in the long run this is in Wr best interest? .
END OF SHOW 5end $3.00 1 Public Citizens
" Nuclear Power Safety Report" F.O. Box 1538 Washington, D.C. 20013 .
O e -
==
l s I i l i 1 i d I. I i DONAHUE TRANSCRIPT 808302 ~Page - 20
?
G
- 9
> 4
, -_ ~
o s ja e > E;m -
,4..,. . . .
m l La Salle power plant to get 2d NRC probe i By Casey Bukro 'Ibe first reactor at the La SaUe plant began operating June 21 for testing. A' Erveronnent editor reactor is expected to go into THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY Cean-mission is launching a'second special operation riext year. AN EDISON vlee ri " -- . Cerdeu. investigabon into poesble construction de. Reed,- told h Tribune that the utHity facts at the $2.5 billion La Salle nuclear has inspected 100 percent of Zack's wort ( power plant, The Tribune learW since 1m because of faulty work dis-
, Wednesday. that year. TypicaUy, only about
- This time, the probe focuses on .
beating, ventilation and air conditioning 10 percent of such work would be inspec-tad to ensure compliance with quality work performed Ay Zack Co.,461(rt2th assurance standards. Pl., Cicero. "We stopped work on the project for Jan Strasma, an NRC spokesman, said two months in IfCS," Reed said, because
- the investigation beginning this week will of concerns over the quality of Zack's examine quality assurance documents: work, bolving welding and certain m
-l welding and materials used in a mul conis on the quality of the welding and g timm6 hasung and cooling syr, materials used on the job.
] tem installed at the Commonwealth "So much of its work did not peas our l .,
rdinaa Co. plant near Seneca IH Special initial. inspection that we just stopped it," ( ) attention will be given to any defects in said Reed. "We made them get their l f ventilating systems la the control roomwhich is supposed to funeden even durf recoalis in and, at one point, they replaced their an accident.
*EVEN IF there is an accident et the quality assurpace manager. If the welds g were not up to our standards, we would plant," said Strasma, the ventHation ask thern to do it again." h cost of' system of the control room has to be able credoing the work was borne by,Zack, he to provide acceptable wo-king canrmians said.
for people werking there." Also, he noted , that ventilation systems must be strong REED 8 AID IT is empesual fler a stuky
- enough to withstand a serious shock, such to maintain .viguance over a contractor r as an earthquake. for such a long time, but added that Earlier this week, the NRC ruled after Zack's work had improved since 1m and
. [ a special investigation that it found tco- is now considered aw=*
struction defects in the plant's concrete "It has been accepta'ble;-but not caly
.)
h andinbolt-tighteningtechzques,butthat that, work prior to 1979 was made right, f the plant was safe for lowpywer opera- lWe had them redo work that was not
. tion. . , men ge. m u .
(-
$~
M
.. ._ .__ _ . _ .. . .. . w .. _ . ,
l s
. . . . . . . T l
l
Paperwork for LaSalle nuclear plant probed. By' George Estep : Is a hardware problem," said Russell Marabito, events of possible safety sigmficance."
- regional NRC spokesman. "What we do want _ mission is to v'ote' on licenstN.
. FEDERAL REGtJLATOR8 are penblag " dis- Some of the jobs might have been done by one
-t crepancies" In a Cicero contractor's paperwork straightened out is the paperwork problem." person ad supervised t=y another, Marabito Meanwhile, Edison has said the delay in liceal.
pertaining to components of the Commonwealth MARABITO EXPLAINED that the contracter, saki. "Or there may be some other plausible sing will cost customera " millions of dollars" FAson Co. nuclear power plant in LaSalle Coun.. t t'ae Zack Co.,4600 W.11th Pl., Cicero, keeps two explanation for it," he said. "Whatever it is, we because of the higher. cost of hlw W. ty c' Nuclear Regulatory Commission ' sets of records on welding jobs: a quality <ontrol want to hear more about it." , spokesman confirmed Monday. report on welding work and a " shop copy." . Queistions about the' plant's heating, ventilethde
~ 'the NBC has withheld an operating license for and air conditioning were raised by two former "There are discrepancies in about 300 of 400 . IAST TtlESDAY the NRC voted not to grant Zack employees. 'they gave the ,NRC some t the $2.5. billion plant until the commission re . welding records," Marabito said, because jobs the LaSalle plant an operating license pending a company niacum.n#
l views the wekling discrepancies in the plant's heating,w!ventilation allegationsand of faulty signed offsigned off by by differcol one person persons in one set of records are quality <ontrol review by the commission. Mara. trol had been deficien in-the other. cir<anditioning systems. bito saki the commissioners planned to review at two planta still under construction: an Illinois l The commission noted the discrepancies in a records that.Zack officials promised to submit
- Power Co. plant at Clinton, Ill., and a %
""I 1 . \ '
gW rw. i l
e Local and area -- Wednesday. Joey Jg, geg - P NRC delays license for Illinois nuclear plant By LORIE $likNE
- Daily Newe staff erher l hat would The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Com. Edesne would mean he granted Cammonweahh the hcense mettenC
- They're a amens the results of our fared afeer reportin Ceasemers power (g sheer fondengs og Apret je Syneeseeatec Assessment messeen Tuesday refesed to grant a full ,e V%s j (* l ^C %O h. 3 now, but would not be able se move se 100 a effaceals as the Lecensee Perferenance report ga ;
power aperating hcense to the LaSalle Pe'C'"8 Pe*er unitt the Zack asseecsvenidatenn were sescatecateon 6 ate theallega. and air condecennengt IlvACDepartment. theateng. Medland I resect Quain y Assurance Censamers a
- Cate County Nuclear Stateen sa Ilheees until resntwed. Arabete emplained Teeesday t eens. They wane more enfermation."
The pt.ent currently es asethersaed se Ar.ebte saed. support systesses. whch 6meludes livA ; me anwestigation into alleged problems charged thew as "cudence of cremonal me*e te feve percene power. G AP has offered legai representatene Caiegory i endacates "Mgh level se ek, g , .ergers t w6th a ptant subcontracter 6s ha.-hed " GAP veces that as me sectedihte perferenance." The high reting w! l' falsdecatens .end eguahty assurance Dentee said chemecal analyws of vectory." G AP employee Bdhe Garde The NRC last ecet. afeer proddeng by essmed abw the NRC had been sold I la e 2.2 infersaal vote, the NHC breakdown" at the LaSalle plant, the strut. brace and sheet steet samples seed en a telepnene enterseew Tuesday. GAP. began an ense.segatese postponed until Aug. e 3 e decessen on Consumers Power Co nuclear plant en used for the ventdatese systene should be l lettmgresnmenwea o Edesen Co. began Mediand and the Chatee nuclear plant, comp leted before LaSalRels Feady se go "We took evedence freen these little duct LaSalle ork supphed by Zack to tue endprotelesne with Zack decomentause . plant. NRC affaceals have seed (4ti-power nperatees at the $2 4 belleen alse te tthness. beyond Isq percent power en the nest whostleblowers and brought it to Asked how the commessese a acth , plant 50 moles south of Cbcago. The clasms envolse the 7ack Corp.. a seven to le days. commesseeners on the eve of a plant the onvestegetsoa may spread to the relates te lhe Midland plant. Ms. Gere The dec6seen was called an "encredeble ferne specsalemang en heateng. ventelatoon .being turned en -. It really talks about M,dtas,f plant, saed "I thnk. altimately, whatev. ' esctory'* by se employee of the and air condeteenmg systems, whech NRC CHAIRMAN Nunsee Palfadene the power of telhng the truth." happens at LaSatie. the beggest issue The whostleblowers Ms. Garde is MIDLAND PLANT $ POME $ MAN the Zack case es geeng te he M6dlead ' Gewersmental (G AP), the orgmessateen Accountabehty Protect which has power suppleed esguepment to she three nuclear and Commissioner Thomas Roberts referr6ng to are feve fermier Zack Corp. Norm Saart of Canaes plants. (k i, suppened Denton's mammendation to employees who have made clases that dechned comsnent on the LaSalle we're sesos to have sesne reet sorten ' } NRC's Harold Denton. dirsetor of the grant the beense en thelcondateos that Zack effacaels ettesnpe e d to cover up dec6 sees this mereeng. saytag the questions for the NRt; *- Office and James of Heclear G. Keppler, Reactor Segulassen. director of the agency's the lab analyses staff. are satisfactory to the documentaties problesna related to company does ret have detads se the. Cerdell R eed, a CesnSeeteetti ; r . l QlU M' L4 s n s -sOga a NRC Region III ethee le 8thaeas. had But Cenemessioners Jaha Ahearne and three aceclearplants. safety-related snaterials send to the Zack case as is pelates to the LaSaRoer Edesen vice pres 6 dent, compteined sh. ' Clontos plants. each day of delay is costing the utstity ' recommended to the five coenmissioners James Asselstine said they wanted to Ceasemers h.as said ks internal elecerte custeeners about $400.000 8 1 i that a full power 'opersting license be m6ew N anefyses of the components Ttie worters have charged they savestigattee of the Zack Co. has se far higher fuelcesta aseecleae granted pending resolut6en of the Zack leefore assuring that the plant poses as disteecred documeetatlee defectencies ' sleews that Gl percent of purchase orders coal as se alterneuve. TONIONT et Zack ' ' . m to Ch6 cage
- misseng and ehered dece. smade by Zack 8er enater6 ale esed de the i
TEEN VOLLEYBALL. g:30 p.m.. charges, en NRC Regies accordengtil spokesman.to Russell Arabase. Vieter Celsesty d6d est ettend encess. Tsesday eheeltle er selety risk. Commasodenerthe"We seen have eeM they em Midlene plaat arela proper order. lac have me resereotions le seyte r plant es safe med shee84 he heemse - West County Communsty Center. 4 ell Smart else seisted out that the NRC"a new." Reed said. FREE HEARING SCREENING. maail 7 p.sn Orchard Drive Aeditorium. M6dtand HospetalCenter. E .. 4' -
.b N
Au um woman sues , Ar OLL.EW $ MATING
- y. 74.p.ne Rett I y
.. 00 p.,
_ , 3. - g~ovemment officials
. 1 COMMUNITY CENTER. 3est Gee.
ree: 7.33g es Reavery tec.; 7:30p.ne
' VNAComples. * ' ' g ' 4p'g hh *..'
#s'd .
MUSIC SOCIETY Presenas. *The
.~ . h s
Sorecter." 8:15 y sn (Jttle Theatee. , f 9y JAMESISELER Dedy N<res uoff writer anembu hear
,,,,,a , g,,,,d at W meag. W t Center for the Arts. Stel West St. ,e
- p gp ,, y.g * ,.
, g,46,,,e g,,gg., g,, ,,, d,,se,,,,,,w,,,these b ,
Adarews. **,- , N;. As Aubsten wesean. the said she was Ann MachetshL approving the ver ' 8* ,e.. ,,,,e CllAIN SAW Safety Program. 7-10 p m.. E ;,p .. / *, ' left weh ne ettw cheece." ided suet Tuesday agaiset die cety charsme h wash no Confmace Rossa. Dow w T g, vielsteena of the state Ogeen Mwanags The sect ales aneses va=8tencourt tel - Carmeng Corp Sagenew Reed. * ' U%t 4 in b i YOUNG BUSINESS Peoples Greisp. ,, 4 .
,. w- ^**. Mrs. Adream. who was et the smeetens Lauese Adries. 813 Great, feled ek seat that the serience lease would be "a , Beat the Capek Neght, satr sneenight.314 .'.(., , . ,,t*'.a . 9 g,v- c , .. . h la &ay Cooney Clitutt Court seehang a 3 eld." She seed she lacet found est th '
Fournie. . . s. dectoratory bedgement agaenst the vernance was approved after she left th A. g 1 ges,, ! tuf** -, , y- ,- Aeheers cany mneg and claesses SM sheer free i
* ; et Zemmg Ay,Comee6sseen and 18s Seard Mxhet.he eas nem a legal vese.
PARENTS WITHOUT Partners Mat. -
; ,4 eals s .en ,s eseample'F
'M g*gg.
eng.8 p.m E et C 18488.320% East Main. * . .e Such erseams "were driar watf=#y e* , dameages ef 5300esch freen tieree appeal *
- heard membres. ysis the homeledge thee the enemmer 0 G2 ACE A. DOW Memodel Gardens. _ , ,
,1710 West $s. Andrews. M; vie. "'.Ja. * ,. ,, .g. '8 s
g, Mrs. Adrian e.eid hFik ortscacY wtech the
- vote' was taken vestated th ',
. sankable Molly llrown. I p.sse. Aede. , witham Strwt of Dganas , had capes of _ r.4 heo e8 she plaespaff% the oust e'letes.
l*'I"'#- ,** .g , ,
,,. t 35' 4e she sua sersed se the appeals heard A sper648 hearms br8are the case '
,,, .,, g, p.neog,ec hers Adrton' ,
PLANNIN chaarnean Je=rph t aellesarmeert med temmeace 7G30.en.1 DICVELOPMENT y m.. Cemeciessanners ,.g.
- accombers Artener Mark-l ks and Ray. ,,, , ,,tauses
,gi-ere eenh d enh a weee e 1.or she apprels lesass ,
i
). lleerdreene.Causth.new Jet West Ma64. suand Kehrw fuesde ,,,,h,,.
- ' # r, Thr .ma s= the lasme rasend he e despees'
*nguense estre May 13. m his Mrs. Adreae At 01:48 suer =1ang. "the driendene ,
l'c ah 42 J f
- dih r.*l she appeas. la.ard are==ed 4 far thw ate em sene Am. shepsr el. N..p . d.A m ea..and e m,ne espec.1e ww ae.tanut ehre sh ,(
ic
,,,..d. der ed
";T.'~t ;',a <l:': "*a'a '" c""'- r.ee"- OP" tvene Isl. Wesere a fles:h be beel. 500 scos "'"' A# P'***'"'
Medl.enet. Anhuen ** g' . . ., . . a ~~-' "h-' '- - * -
I"/sihM:%,"y*Cr 70:,7." : ce ,' ..E"i..f.";', l'::,,."'.E'.Vll : "A Co'nsumers Power 1 inun, made ihrnuth ronner and cAi> "c* e .any os thver obicitsvrs sef
"*' "' ^
subEit .Y"c"ia on
' '"d ' " *"
, ed In"f rNn"whD ' c d$a aN ' a Co., which the Midlan~dis building nuclear $
u h ue H pa>> aloN in our was true. but it did noi. w.th the posnable u}n . y plant, suggested th a t. ,,, caception of the torquing of holt ' h n SAP's failure to have ."
~ its LaSalle allegations n'i
'q j'll*"I proven is an indication th l, of the effectiveness of In*.
Nuclear GAP. But GAP saysjtg -
- may have lost a battle ca I3lant but not the war, ob ;
kn po en NRC launches new probe into be So i Zack. quality control practices 5;
. ByPAUL RAU bodies to look at them."Strasma said.
Daily News staff writer , "The fact that you have records which $! The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Com. He charges said the involved mission is beginning a new invhstigation nuclear plant. and did not learn that the NRC only the also Midland believed mean the onis their the system going toface fail." are que tha today into allegations that the Zack !.aSalle and Clintc,n plants are involved Strasma said, noting ductwork is not nes subjected to high pressures. Corp. falsified elocuments for safety, until the Government Accountability related . equipment supplied to three Project (GAP) mentioned that fact nuclear plants, including the Midland recently. CONSUMERS SAID its reviews show nuclear plant. 80 problems with ductwork in the -
"{ GAP official) Billie Garde's com. Midland plant supplied by Zack. "We're Although the investigation will begin ment caused us to go back and look at confident that HVAC systems at this at the la$alle nuclear plant in !!!inois, it the information."Strasma said.
~
may spread to the Midland plant if plant will be built to the necessary J. . He said the new probe is beginning at specifications and will be operated , m warranted, Jan spokesman according Strasma. to NRC Region
- IIg the LaSalle plant because it is loaded safely." said plant spokesman Norman with nuclear fuel and nearly ready to Saari. a
, a Consumers Power Co. which owns the operate.
Midland plant, today had no comment on He noted that the .NRC's latest ' s the. new investigation, which is the resulted in a finding ofAn NRC investigation of Zack in 1980 evaluation of construction quality at tne ' I second probe of Zack's activities in two violations and a $38.000 fine multiple Midland plant gave Consumers high
- c years. The utility said that it is aware of . Consumers v>hich is responsible for allfor marks for work on the HVAC systems, g s the allegation.s. but has received no work done by subcontractors. Zack was
, s notification from the NRC of an prohibited from working on safety.
investigation, related systems at the Midland plant 8l,nd I man killed -* A third plant, the Clinton nuclear plant until its work was inspected and its af er. Shooting l in. Illinois, also is involved. Zack, based welders retrained. e l in Chicago, supplied ductwork for 1 heating, ventilating and air conditioning STRASMA SAID the new allegations e l KALAMAZOO (AP)- A man who was . 1 HHVAC) plants in systemsthe NRC'sat those turee multi-state nubeay Region equipment - add.to vendor. Zuk'& spotty reccrd i.s a nudcar blitided by a shotgun biantlour III. "It is quite clear that Zack is at three shot and wsunded a female bank 5 construction sites in Region !!!. and that employee before being slain by police. STRASMA SAID NRC investigators there have been problems with their authorities reported today. would visit Zack headquarters in work at all three sites." he said. Kerry Lorenzo Little. 21. of Ka. Chicago today to study documents, and But he said it is not yet clear whether Ismazoo, on Wednesday stepped into the g that other investigators would take anything is wrong with the material bank with the aid of a white walking g, samples of Zack. supplied ductwork and Zack has supplied to the~three nuclear cane and asked for Patricia Shipley. 27 p a supervisor at a branch of the American supports 3 the LaSallewhich plant. have been installed atpaperwork Plants. He said it could be only a National Bank in Kalamatoo. problem. He said the sarnples would be analyzed Authorities say he went into Ms. ! Nuclear plant ductwork in many cases Shipley's office and shot her once in the to see if '.he metal they are made from is made of the same commercial grade abdomen. a meets NRC specifications for safety, metal used elsewhere in the construction n grade nuclear plant components. Two police offleers answering a silent Industry. But if "There wiu be an investigation as it safety-related nuclear plant systems - the ducts are meant for alarm spotted Ms. Shipley, bound and g e b Epplies to Midland."Strasma said. such as ventilation for control room Eagged, lying on the floor of her office with Little standing nearby with a gun in . 3E The NRC received allegations in May operators - then federal codes require his hand. ? from a former !ack etaployee that Zack that vendors certify that tYe. materials' records were inco' m plete and inac. meet specifications. -- ' He fired at the police officers when [ they told him to surrenderR. The curate. Strasma said, but did nothing Control room ductwork is especially officers fired three shots at Little. cbout the charges until now because critical at the Midland plant. where striking him once in the chest. He died at other, higher. priority investigations operators may have to be protected from Borgess Medical Center in Kalamazoo. were under way. accidental releases of toxic materials y The allegations "were, frankly. placed Police say he was blinded by a shotgun from the nearby Dow Chemical Co. blast in 1978 in a case of mistaken plant. O on hold because we didn't have the identity. r The Midland Daily News - 7/22/82
0 GAP charges. dismissed
~
at Illinois nuclear plant
.yP - R.. e-. . - . I . . .r .. y .I Osely News staff wenee pr m.. ..f . r. f .t . .
Allegebens made by the Gewernment A fter the NRC verCed that a t. .. e. .. Ih.. Ie .. .e. ..a.hey . .f subcpatracter had falsefeed records of there wa s pe delay. that wegid ha ve beca accovatadhey Prosece fGAPI and einers about ensafe condeseas at the torque wrench cahbrasmas,3.0e0 boltsadded. saemey se the best for us." Toscas La$ane Cavat y Necsear Stauea ** en safety-related valves in the La14tte lihases were dest'*4 sed by the Nuclear contasament bustdeng were chuked for Toscas aise told a reporter to "be llegulatery Ceme.shten bleaday. tightness. Five were met tightened Alekawgh a gnrepenanth NRC laves- property, iachsdeg some that could be aware'* for#ehey [aspaute that GAP5tudies. is an arm of the "IPs is a turned by hand. $trasma sa d. legateen substanteated se8ae of the Other than that.none ef the elleeatione left.weag. radscal theat tant that has charges. parttestarty (, AP. the agency thast decided sinada mene had by theresulted an werk that would saake the spar.sarad agkaanp, rate actavstees, sa potentsat se compromese the plant's plant safer. Strasme sa64. He said the they have abgectsges beyesHf a concera safet y. NRC fewad one aea<erapliance 6e Line for the safety et the pla'at." he said. LaSalle securay predram, but that et Toscas said he does met beheve that LaSalte Unit 1. the Lasatie workers who made the covapneted. een new the Isrst toup he tested betoweeld 1 nas result en a feme. percent of full power. the N R C said. Esampics of alicaatsens that were allegatsens had ulterior mouves such as Commeawealth Ed.sen Co the utshey fewad to be true but discounted and ecladeddeda'sbatting the project. understand what they"Theywere saw thtags. bw.nding the LaSalle unds, said GAP's charges that tee LaSalle reactor mvaavement at tne nwetear plant han net busadeng had settled, voeds esisted se yousopheng get a betterat. But as you se up perspective of the theladder. centrete reacter pedtstals, concrete saetsves. (C AP) is not just a httle, made theeasy succeeded plaat en any safer cesseng and lihases , has conta as debris. the plaat's ausilaarY 6anecent group concerned unh the build ag watt et teakssg. and that safety et the plaat."he added. ratepayers more money.
" As far as we're conceraed. CAP has matrumcats were sabotaged sa 154 g
a credsbehty gap." seed Cesameamcalth GAP off cials saed the NRC adestled Whele endevedwal GAP officials have speaceman.'ames Toscas. at a Monday meeting 6a Ilhasis that admitted ta havias an ante +ectest bias. g And Censumers Power Co.. which is drishag ente the concrete LaSatte the group says ets seee sesa es se see that ,,, busassag the Mediand avetear plaat contaansaent apparently had severed er
- where GAP also has started an NRC damaged 3.898 steel reenforceag rods en the NRC enforces the Atomes Emergy sevenusateen late the concrete = more than half of the Actteet property. GAP ene IPS both easest the pareat ergansaation eserts httle construcuen prsblevas. suggested that GAP's failure echar 6a the Una l ceata. ament.
la have ets LaSalle allegateens preven as Rebar es setended to strengthen the centrolover GA P's ecuvitses. sa widecauen of the effecuveness of the teacrete contanamcat besidsags whacit *'ll's just a red herreng." Clark S&ed of ,, g whoseleenewer prosecteen group. heute reacters at evelcar planta, and to Tutas* charge that G AP is contredied by
- Censumers spakesman Norman saars prov de protectea from wind 4rtven idWudies espoused by IPS. He saed the I "h, seed G AP was
- blows out of the water" et,eets eve,*g a tareado. W "
- at LaSalle. and that Midland resedents **They tekstanstated that le pceteset of egram p.eiJimgtea run by $cheel, IPS.an "has educauenal taucht
~ should he aware of the LaSalle saery the retars were severed. To us. that's serporate effectals how to lobby. The ,#8P sigtefecaat: ee them (the N R C). it's aet." , I'8 whole the N R C's savesugaison gets said G A P's Clarh. course was taught by a Reagan 8" maderway inte CAP *s attegauena atewt the Mediend auc6 car plant. The NRC's Strasma. who attraded the supporter.a supply. seder. At "The usututa es a deverse place. It's that' Bus C AP says et may have last a battle saeetog Manday but was met present aos possible to put a fes on the eastdute." the#8ed but mee the war. and that other GAP when the rebar guesuened avaitersthe whether were Ua84 descussed.
8 cea- CAP's Clart said. recele auclear plaat , semster snage mvestegrateoas betere the group' ke*e h"s tanament has eelt ?,800 steef remierctas , ecee 8' Clark said GAP's goal to set le TFat attenauens memdatstantiated. bars. "L ut whatever the numbers are.
" Consumers should maderstand the they're e reptable."$trasma said of the 4acrease the eept of the La$aHe plaat. ) Vete8 e g significance of a temporary setback damaged chars- but to make it safer. "I don't know that gre de the plant es any safer as a resuM af what of e8t because they've suffered se many." said COMMON 1b C ALTH EDfSON'S happened, sa,d.
but we're not deae yet." he rate Louis "Ne ene Clart. herc hasCa AP's esecuuve sense ef defeat." director. Toscas was better abeest G AP's ea- end74 volvemeet en ecspetaLing the ,NRC Tsus THE FIRST allegsheas of wasafe Clark and Belhe Garde. 's GAP decPip km as ready'en suae 2le test he a wt readeseas at LaSalle were made March LaSalle Uset I past the sere power level. ("j yn ,g 25 by Illeness Attermey Fahaer, who contended - based en General Tyreae but couldn't because of the NRC probe, cea ed i e N C s LaSak mm-attegatmas made by leemet LaSalle The resulteag ilday delay 6a the testing tigue was met thereugt pagg and . , workers = thas esicasene dritteng ease schedule wed cost CE $10 malhea en 'h#a CAP ma,7 ees nt to som, ee the eac vasens the concrete coatamment structures had replacement power cents of they delay cannet he made up between new and
,w ,gme w n aos ,,
severed se many steet reenforcing bars se.pteniste r. ehen full operateen as ferbars) the she contaemments were especied. T esc as said. $trasma seed th.e NRC new vs4 'I seriously weakened.
- M the W 4 8 1s.en en Aped U. Gall weeied the
. . And hesaid she lihaces atalat y enew* red , ,,,,, It enhsteed a great deal case by discloses a new series of $300.000 to 3300.000 en espeases whole I
#'"' a.
alkgatsnas en antareerd afhdawns frert complying with the NRC savestigaten, 'la n'"# semat ** 'm"d un"
'"'"'"'ho"ut'"fiadmg eaths
[ saciudeas ruament a essapester analyssa. pt at ...rker . The NBC, had gnea appresal for 1 percent which already drethag men c'errete and en eae case ""heT LaSa le at 30 me'les see.shoest gaa operasen at LaSalle Unit t. rescended scuring a m all de= a. of Checago, was supposed to cost $g70 cega thet appres ol pading resoluteen of both we actually daneaged the plaat to malhen when wert begse 6a tase l973. Its wp #t sets et aWgauens- prove to them so was beest right. It was tWil2.U bh *ha'2 I Meaday. the N RC se.J all the ekarges ludacreus." Tesess emed. '"'q h.ve b rewind. NRC speaesmo ,,Of,,a ai s G, AP and the Ilhaeas atterac.y uo s mac ih,m gh r.h.the auga. se, asma n.d may of To,,,,
,, sa,h,e,ed.
ob, -Th,, haven Consumers Power me and GAP ,a,,,,,,,,d,,,,n,,, am, ,,,a.,a, e, of wne se,wouaie# "The afredaveis ibey ,,,,,,
,,a,e h ,,ecum,. An Co** which is building **3 safe
".'s"
"""',';'~""*"
",'**av, suce,eed e d.eng the Midland nuclear ab.
nee,O'b.s d7'io."'w,U,*p*o*T 's a' e.pIant, cene,,g usa of ihe serguma of wis. "" 8'" e'eas suggested that d,L'-
, _. - .Ge .Ae P's s . f ailure. e to have paa
.se. .
The Midland Daily News -7/22/82
8
'I p Hred Zac < workers c aim
- The MMland 7'23'82 Daily
. 9, - -
coveruo Ina c ua'ity control J
- u. ., P uusu osa, Ne.s ata,f wret. 'N s ooCoueN im. Zaci .,Ts !
Fews former empseyres of the tack + ** hat'a v-as- - Corp. have
"- ~
*dwow Co asi mmenan on.ao n
. ,g paperwerk problems were potenhapy
, tant .ende, charged anem,tuthat to the co sectear
, up a < A npertable ' te the NAC weder part
=adeapread beeandewa ia 6 a:me> pf a. Code of red-si documentatsen for safesy.related repearets suppleed to three avclear t
yhy#l Itegulatieas. The report begaa. "There h*s besa a knakoews of me 4.ainy 1 p ata. among them the Mediand escleef""" L assurance program for document J e'"tr*3-
. .* H$f'llf The faer, who went pubiec meth.aheer si f c
$ silegateams en a Checago televeneen N p!f IIIk addases boddeng auclear power planta
';' sorteen Thersday neehe c le !
s renert any sigaefecant deveJteens frone e fired from thew fees ~ ZMk's$s !sem Qualety teterfb! .Ot4. ** were -
- 5a*TT .aderat codes te the N R C.
M *E 't_ -
- " ~ - - " ' '
Assurance (Q4) documentation secteen Zaft saw la the Wat
'** "maaetherised personnet,,npMhad gasned after they reperted the beeskdown te tempded from a notarised affedavd ef fustite fer Criminal preseculosa. yg g eccess te the deCuments and made Ceassemers Power Co. effaceata at the 8+dlead plaat. seNera to by one of the four employees, officials said then that paperwerg " improper modef,ecationst Zack said en en
'4 Decaments sadicate Censumers Dady News setephone 6aterviews weth wietateens had been commuted, but that the report. These errors apd hecaene aoare of the QA breakdown " that persem and see.e ef the ethers ia the the case was met streag enough to Contiewed en page 3 seSt .se Ottahre tsat repart from Zach, hwt groep and a versety of documems that warrsat the Justace Depart ment *s .
cry des en e d sca.as e report ag the proedems appaeendy passed hesween Zack, attenteen. to the oasumers. Sechtet Power Corp. and g.g Ca* *e***U *a S Nuclear It e gulatory C, enders that suppleed. materials te Howard Zack, said in has swesa statement. ~ * "
- 7 ** - y -
il which es le be seat to the fdRC. "It as a The N RC. whech herame aware af the Cepees of the tatter documents were fact that the hestery of the Zack Corp. ia
- s ton preewems at lack en May of thes year. eMamed by me leur whestleblowees and auclear centractang is full of mistakes. ,
ead took ne acteen vend thes week after besag geven to the omely News by C AP. bungisags ano feloneous misstatements I prodded by an offseial for the perseasCAP. who whech protects and represents fraud se arelated terial to re sterial iraceavender bilit y. g ng* biow the whestie me y N Gaveramcat Accewntabehty Project Sed abuses. H6d it cautaened eM four certel Catse9 certificatten. (C A Pl. whech has offered qualeficatica of quality ' formertegal Zack that geeng pwhat with theer asarsatmas centrol perseemet and mas agapertantly, ] . acts revesentalves to the fewe could seepardise theer careers. Det GAP the purchase and supply of hardware in empeayns-The NAC began an innstigation saed they decided to seest out due to the used' 6e the cenattactees of amelear Thuaday at the LaSalle nuclear plaat in snagnitude of the problems they found at facilities."
,p ' gg n d*d 8a Ilhase, to see el ductwork sapphed by gacg, .
g Zart saeets federal codes and the HOWARD SAfD the rerst step la the '- treacy saed the prete esay spread te the HOWARD. 48. the father of le. said in Zach " coverup" begse inhe before I"eae M*diand plant his affidavet. "It is imselerebee le my the QA documemateen secties was ,, [ senacerace as a father, a estisen and as formed. and la addities to other *
- g de-d e TEE FOUR perseas, all of thesn new eenployee to les probiens of this alterations included forged " stickers"
- 2 hskea en she meclear feeld, were hered by Zack magnitude ge weesposed." applied to materialcortifications.
d see arevad Octeter IH4 se clean up as one He said that because some snateriale la a telephens laterveew. Howard of the four put it, a " horrendous mesa" ordered by Zack ded met meet federal refwsed to near,e the Zack perasanel who 4 d 28 cf daeumeais as Zack s hadquartas in specificatamaa. the lastallation of did the forgeng and alterations other q pmd Cherage. Speedicaley. they eaed they ductwere in the three m eiur planta than te my the peresas are in
- upper erada mey have *crwacal Isaplications for the management." He said. "We know who 8vd 45were gesep se create yerchaee a fa.ag eedera sysum wasadh to health and safay of raideata la ne k is. but we did met find at necessary to term certereras soas shewsag that the materiate e.rrounding me,e comm.eeitees." These put a finger se them. The Justice
.ase by Zact to the three etaitees were LaSau are mediand. s, area su in the case of Deeartment=&utakesareof tha." R E $ 1G 68 E D - Murray t *38 eessahie far e se en avetear p4 ants. e and c6ste,. til for the Caiaten The mest step la the severup. Howard }
. Amt acclear plant. said, was en offeet to correct altered er Weidenbaum. Chelrman of the .
What they feuad.two of the leur said. caete "I am coenmitted to espesing the fell saissing documents by send 6ag letters to Pftlidenf*$ Council of Economi e mth wee that many docusaeats were misseng essent of thes fiance eatd these awclear wartees venders esties these de certify AdVIS4fS. ha$ ftsigned gad that thousands mere had beta plants are entirely rechthed and that snaterials they suppleed 66 Zack Dagt II.
- ragan
the othereseret altered. yped. whited.eut falseised by other Zack er certefoed as safe by trustworthy, were suitable for safetygrade nuclear
. plant systems.
was ssapierees before the QA decumentat** independent third parties." he said. emam == cmted te dus with the Sherity afw the QA documentaties Some veaders never easwered. One
-Consumer Pro 6 tem. sectica was se,med, newud wu which did mid Zak had met we,ed Pr ice -
lasse Shortly after the persea instaued as its superviser. He said that safety.$rade components in W first W6 prehiems to consemer,s reported through$$te the ' at best,the activities of has group were a Place. - indeX
.es. paperwert shu Medi.ad Pro,cet ouasiiy . 4aerance v",em ,eate,ing ei.ffle" to keep theofNRC
- la a letter dated.ofSept. 21.1961. . Base Period fire, Department (MPQAOn.the entece leer. herrehie essent Steen S.ppe re divisies the U.S. Steel Uj, gact , dacementaties breakdowa. Ae Corp gag this nely se Zack: "These 290 1967 e 100 Atact person
*'8are demanecddocumentaties by Zack en Apret:9. team was the wor st, he said the falsified orders were met called in ta ser The effaceas teasoa was a departemental decemcaes may represent a criminal salesperrsee as
- Safety R ees ted.*
** ep *cerg Mr*Te " t-* the icy.c cts ce,erus hy lack. Therefere..they were handled la e '
Saude th*/* n'obseeneng".alsified 'deconfeats se e SeeraselProteture Dae asc'rua ihreag'h *285,e -
' .- - - -1 were Zack's
- ea carrect tered en searefresas ser attempting in f deral agency, auch as the NAC.4a.a#JAZ .(verefesaties and testing) sseve paperwerk
' tbs pre.blems. At Brast ene of them. Se vietatma et federellse. Nekher the NRC program Please advise es what es d'ed nor any other law enforcement er meant by the term *Salety Related' a.J g{P-3 eh lv father mi 10 chddrea who es new out of resetatery agency has concluded that what ehlegateam if any does this empted ehem **erh. seed be es ceasedermg ideng svet such testatecas were cesamitted by en the supplief.**
48amn Zack. Zech. The letter ladecated U.S. Steel rupply ra M**3 The four are Albert T. (Terryl se 1988. a similar case levolving Zack had seat Zack 26 erders of masoness - Newsed. Sharon Merette. Mark Cieseni
- 0ut 4:ad Charles Grant. All live in the was nearly sent to the U.S. Department between DecemberISOS and Maylif t.
pp Checree area and were lessered in a F s j un2..ly_Pa.o.m"E_r?
-.e, -e..c. e Ch .
Consume.rs reanecking. =n-
*ad me cesassaved tearent. A prehcer as the eu natem saed mere
~~ 'I 265a y,3c',er ,c:: pet =ay .m be was pocked o' l
tae dias
'::rmas; 20Ck COCUmeDfOfIOD JASONDJFMAMJ insi sol,ceo.ot. a war =
im ! e ts ByPAULRAU y as appropriate action to Maelve thesn." the l l
~e raw FLO Thatcher *- C- m Deny News staff writer P.w-C.-Mt-a -- S- n--
statemeat teacs.dn. Its own envuesgatma of document Systematic Auessment of Licenece
-4 A r". Sou<<.dCPI UP . 4,- iu-, Consumerin price $.
I ged deficiencies at the Zact Co. bas se fa, Performance (SALP) reiport gave gas 0line Costs, increased in PLO shown that Il percent of purchase orders Censumers the highest mort for Lating . lune. the 90Vernment $43d made by Zack for sestereals used la the *agsmssive action" to mein past today. MW,96* U. Midland nuclear plant are in propw proeless sat Zeck's work at the , ~ ca ih-very scon ,*r C~m - en.enes.tesa m i= 4ug. ef t.
.an wia deiaa-
- - - -- - ~ ~~ -
yen. caamm 88.8a f*r eai4 ===ce n Six killed in ovd LONDON fAPI . Preme Minester andof thatththe check ack pwell contanee ents4 orders are all (QAl deficeracies eastalling se Zack's and heuteag watalatlag wert ai' an y lane Collis, ion - Stargaret Thatcher has guied out sa g,,,,e,,,Z,4,,,,,e,,rcha se j j .h4: etr8y general electeen, saying he' ,, condetiemeag (HVAC) systems at MERCER ISLAND. Wash. (AP) = Plant spetesman Normaa Saari said Midland pleet. the Two smau planes coateded with e " loud, ave Cea nertsteve geyernment needs at least 3 h metause clash"over this estand saturb.
,- g ,m-e,,,, ,,, , ;",,*a mm- - Consumers metefeed eguim,y the U S. Nuclear Commesseen
..e m ._. a.; faa of use ,,Since
,e,t. Ceasethea.e,. the N.RC,said ,en the SAL.P killing sia people a,s they og ,ess ve .oien a ~,,eewe, an. mau ing .6,es ,ove... crashe.d ne
.e .. . .
.e-rar e a _ _ a_ a : e - - - - - -- ~ .
a e ngsn. . e mg t ..c h . . l. .g y out ..I the e M.a n.sgs'ng rne.are h progra m> s h.st ic.a.) A m e r e r.s n Institute of Chemical la bui. story to commerrui realsty. into new .and inmtvatsve areas m the Engineers m June l%2. l The Midland Daily News -
- F. ired Zack employees charge =
n-plant quality control ' coverup'
'CU i* Continued from page 1 50:53(c) report with the NRC. my family is unforgivable." he said. Ile us what
# said Thursday he stillis out of work, and
"' inconsistenews made the matersal IN LATE l981. How ard said. he and his now has no medical insurance for
' certifications suspect and, by tea m began to be harassed and himscif or his family.
"'f*"i h implicatson. the material suspect."
intimidated by Zack management Howard.of Massachusctts. said he is a
! Zack wrote that its personnelinvolved because they refused to cover up the retired teacher with 25 years experience
'.I"*
h in the alterations "are loyal empicyces document problems, and while their actions are not condoned. as a principal, assistant principal. He sak' he had a meeting in February special education teacher and science d it is understood that it was done with the with David Calkins, who was then head teacher. He also owns a real estate far b r thought that it was helping the Calkaack's GI 2 QA department. and told consulting firm which one of his company." Zack said it reprimanded the ns the document problem still was daughters is now running. or an# employees by demoting them and not under control. He said he took the job with Zack at puttmg cratscal letters in their personnel Another meeting followed on March 8 Calkins* urging because he wanted to files. with Christine Zack DeZutcl. the change careers,
h " But Howard claims that, to the best of president of Zack Corn Howard said orP his knowledge, none of the persons Mrs. DcZutel assured him Zack would EVER SINCE GAP began an gg,o,; in responsible for altering the documents not interfere with the work of his investigation of the Midland nuclear ya g,CY wus ever demoted. department. plant this spring. Consumers has On April 13. Howard said. Hank claimed that G AP's probe is not needed
.r t h e, ON NOV.3.1381.a meeting was held at Leonard of Consu m ers' MPQAD because the in. house MPQAD system ad!and. thc Midland nuclear plant to discuss the promised him protection And and the NRC offer workers all the Pd'Ol* Zack QA situation as described in an confidentiality it Howard's team would avenues they need to resolve their
** October report from Zack. Attending report the document deficiencies complaints about construction
. Road were officials for Consumers. Bechtel. through the MPQAD investigatory problems. I scarch MPQAD and Zadk QA. According to the system. Howard said he-did so on April But Howard said in his affidavit. " . j minutes of the meeting. Zack was asked 15. my personal experience dictates that tsive* to claborate on the positions taken by the Leortarrf then flew from Midland to action would be personally disasterous 8'O cther two utilitics to which Zack had Chicago and conducted a two-day for any other employee who wishes to reacrted its document problems. investigation. Howard said Leonard notify MPQAD of serious problems.
p'*eess
'
- 0I Three utilities - including Consumers pledged that the integrity of the QN "It has been a sobering education to
- received Zack reports on the QA program would be maintained, but that realize that the information I brought s are Commonwealthbreakdown. Of the three. mstead, his team again began receiving forward in good faith because I was ng the Edison. owner of the oral assaults from Zack management. concerned about the safety of my fellow I
LaSalle nuclear plant. determined the Howard said that on April 29. he was Americans in Michigan and Illinois has PI"5 problems should be reported to the NRC. fired along with the rest of his team. Ms. led to incredible financial hardship for
.'3
- Ih' 4th' 350Clinton Illinois nuclear Power Co. which owns theaMorello. Cicioni and Grant. my family.
plant, did not send "We were obviously canned because .
"What is everi more sobering is to with $0:55(c) report on the problems to the we knew too much. We were retaliated accept that the Nuclear Regulatory i ,n eeds NRC. against. Their excuse was a Commission has received alt of the said. According to minutes from J the departmental reorganization, which information concerning Zack, including Midland meeting,it was agreed that "in means~ they Just , hired four evidence, and has failed to act on it."
l "' 'I virtually all cases. rnaterial is replacements. That's enactly what they Howard concluded.
'h""*
acceptable or will be deemed did." Howard said. The NRC says it received a!!egations sed, to accept a ble. There is not toecial material Irc said the dismissals were a risk about Zack's document situation on May
""?8 00* involvea Ynd the major issue is- Zuk took. "They had-done it in the past '3. bot did' nothing about the chargw -
l' certification and/or proof. In worst and were successful. They thought we because other investigations were more D2w cases, additional testing may be would just walk away. We are not ones to important. arca required." Consumen did not file a mess around with like that without just When GAP official Billic Garde cause,." Howard said. pointed out the significance of the Howard said he is contemplating suing information the NRC already had 8 Poly-pliers
,and D reSS""UP ~
Zack. "I don't know what a good lawyer received from the former Zack would ask for in damages, but I will employees, the NRC began an show no mercy. What they did to me and investigation of Zack on Thursday. l ig. playgrounds m ist Midland man is found and The week of July 26 has been irms. designated as " dress-up week" by the
= B?iEBE'E5 ! innocentin arson case il t3 like. The daily themes are: Monday, in de 1890's Day: Tuesday. Western Day:
Widnesday. Backway Day: Thursday. I us 13 Punk Rock Day: and Friday. Leader. A Midland man was declared innocent ci is Look.A.Like Day. by reason of insanity on a charge of On Monday. the playgrounds will take
>u rn 2 1 is a trip to Stratford Woods for a hot dog arson toto Midlan<f according Court records.
a residence i9 Midland County Circuit County. (Q y ff$ icIs" cook-out from 11 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. Garth R. Jacnbson. 36. I410 Maryland.
- s. Children are to bring a sack lunch
, iness including a hot dog bun and something to was ordered to enter treatment in a local years in Jackson State Prison 140 days l 4,,. drink; the city well.orovidc one. hot doe hospital . ._dyringafter beingeri. a non.iurv declared
- e.. u. innxent credit for time .s.er.ved, i . e....n. ...
i.n co.nn.ection
a .
, . .' e
- Moretto. Mai si Ousons was nearly wns Lee the U.S. Dep4 ment bet w .cn Decernh. r 1%0 and May IHl. #' 3" ira ns. Ai! ' lat e *m thr l nd were featured in . Tha Hiditnd D2ily Nmea - 7 j , ,
FsM Consumers rec /2"/82aecmng q the Chec.sgn area, in to
~
6aght. A producer at the W:::".: Zack documentation "*mm Source. Dept. of Labor By PAUL R AU appropriate action to resolve them." the
- 1. p. , Daily News staff writer statement concluded. , CPI UP - ConSurner I l l , Consumers Power Co. said today that S. sari noted the the NRC's April 20 Spurred by a big [Ur its owa investigation of document Systematic Assessment of Licensee 4g deficiencscs at the Zack Co. has so far Performance (S A LP) report gave gasoline Costs, increas shown that 81 percent of purchase orders Consumers the highest mark for taking June, the governrnen9 Oa made by Zack for materials used in the " aggressive action" to resolve past today. Story, page 12.
Midland nuc! car plant are in prcper problems with Zack's work at the
*'a'n'$ume s said it ee,an its in heese "In*3 f="rt ii 'ae"ac ,,ned s,m MI M ,in SOOn. investigation in late August of last year. Gnem WM M WW amane
- 3) - Prime Minister and that the check wat e 'ntinue until all (Q A) deficacncies in Zack's work in l llISbn of the Zack purchase orders are installsng heating. ventstating and air MERCER ISLAND. Wash.
her has ruled out an documented properly. conditioning (HVAC) systems at the Two small planes collided with Plant spokesman Norman Saari said Mand plant. metallic clash" over this estand n nt need at less Consumers notified the U.S. Nuclear in office-to implement Since then, the NRC said in the SALP killmg six peopic as they crashe Regulatory Conmission last fall of 2,e report. Consumers' aggressive action in freeway and sc.attering debris cies' thtr full year of sound disarray in documentation at Zack s controlling Zack's quality programs has out two ncighborhoods.authoriti inuin victor nt Chicago headquaders. He wassnot sure resulted in " marked improvement in the No one on the g'round was injus
# date, but said me notificadon iopef Ily a dram t c - control of the HVAC installations." John Schwartz, a deputy fire the U.S. economy of ['#PLC ber 1981- SAARI HAD no comment on other Seattle, " aid 2ble is take app Pr,iate s the dead aboard th.
Saari also confirmed that Consumers aspects of the allegations made by the 172 Skyha wk !! were believed ts
'n ech 12ligislators- did not file a 5055(e) upon wie me four persons fired by Zack in late April. two men, two women and a child E.0sh i poha! system.RC on the document problems' He said he did not know why they wcre Another man died in the sceor !
although one other utility - fired. - which crashed in the yard of w3 won a e, year Co m m o n w e alth Edison Co. - "It is Consumers Power policy that we about three-quarters of a mils (
. c n er ne son at determ med that the same Zack will not comment on personnel matters The men was pulled alive f
{rj[ men mes re next LaSalledocument proble.m nuclear plant in was reportabic at the related to people not in the employ of wreckage but pronounced c Illinois. 8 Consumers declined comment on why Consumers Power." he said. arrivalist Overtake Hospitalin 1 ation sha wi call n Zack official David Calkins, who hired Identitics were being witheid t elt s tuation was not uponabic all of 1983' ahead of a the four persons to manage Zack's QA notification of relatives. cf strikes that could der 5055(e) of ec Code of Mrsl documentation section, did not return a The National Transportatio: R 'gu 81I ".8- Daily News telephone call. i irity among voters Saari said the utility.s report to the Board was investigating the call g, ;g
;"i!"2h0 is'fa'dg U""r"'^ ~r$ "EM n'A Zack employee '
reached by telephonenc"la'nn"%'A'2.""" (MPQAD) and was in the form of a Hank Leonard. Consumers' section Management Cornetin Action Repon. head for HVAC work within MPQAD. tWO arreS}ed 4nservuive P:ll. published Party witJul{ which details a utiuty's eHons m nsoln was in a meeting this morning and vita, a 19.-point lead' a pr blem. unavailable for com ment. Saari said. MELVINDALE (AP) - Ti l y'ositiin 3 Labor Part The four former Zack employees claim faced arraignment today in the CONSUMERS ISSUED N foHowing they were fired about two weeks after of a 41. year-old Melvind.aic polic . ahead Cf the centris c rporatestatementtoday: oci;l DImocratic and they reported the documentation fo!!owing a service station he l ,. " Consumers . Power Co. has received
, ,several mquiries regarding recent problems to MPQAD and Leonard,sho suburban Detroit,authoritics sa allegations concerning the job records reportedly offered thericonfidentiality. '
The woun,ded offices. Riol. ass Saari confirmed that Leonard did offer was in critical condition ca l . g required to be kept by the Zack Co. fo the use of MPQAD to help the four morning at Oakwood Host work being performed at Midland. has been previously reported, the enta,As re persons resolve the document problems.
Dearborn,
hospital spokesman One of the four. Albert T. Howard, the Waha said. S Claimed Zack auality assurace program has been fo,mer supervisor or the Zack QA under miensive review and revision for documentation Green was ;aken to surgery section. said he would minutes after the shooting late 'l R. EI Silvador ( AP) - several years with regard to Zack s advise other workers not to report afternoon with a gunshot wour thts vi !:tions continue regords. ' A C'orrective Action Report issued proble..ms to MPQAD because the results abdomen and a hand injury. II
. pita contentions by the ,,, personally disasterous" for him. . the intensive care unit after 3%
ction th:t the situagon Aug. 28.1981. by the Consumers Power Saari said. "I don't know who Mr. surgery, in which a portion the Human Rights Quality Assurance Department has been Howard is, but I think his comments are officer's bowel and two finge SalvIdor says. fully invertigated . and thoroughly inappropriate. The facts carry out that removed, Waha said, t watchdog group said documented. MPQAD has been doirg an exce!!ent The incident began when t alv dorins were killed "To date. the documentation on some job ~- robbed a Melvindale g.as station r2 months of this year. 81 percent of 900 Zack Co. purchase He added "What we are committed to with about $100. Melvindale po uring th3 same period orders has been reviewed and found to be doing is to ensure the safety of the HVAC Kasper Ohannasian said. c mmission member acceptable. The Investigation is Green, who was alone in a pa Jd Thursday that "the continuing on the remamder of the systems through an appropriate 4th r 20 or two bodies documentaticn and will continue until all QA construction overview,program, an appropriate an appropriate andhe testing after unaware stoppedofthe thegetaway robbery,vii obi:m is that seriousacceptable. records have been verified as program and an appropriate a routine traffic check. Oh.inna n rights c:ntinue." pnoperational program." The men, whose names were s cr Derne R. Hinton "We believe this . is. an excellent Saari said Zack is continuing its work were arrested a short time elk th t human rights example of the effectiveness of the on- as a subcontractor at the Midland plant adjoining Dearborn based on alv: dor t.re "improv. site quality assurance program to and that it is at full force with about 17h tions, according to Dearbor
, discover discrepancies and take Detective Sgt. James 5 erb.
workers. -
- r t
NHU Dro Dinc ."or ~rauc
~
m
> q,b >
1 lu <e aian: cecorc s
'Whistleblowers' question qualitycontrol V i BY DAVE SEDGwsCat see=s Statt we ser false information, incomplete infor. ceiving as'surances that Zack would mauon and forging ofleformation." improve its record-keeping. sald Strasma said Taursday. Hank Leonard. Consumers Powers' i
_j-l-l - ' A succentrador at Consumers ' The News has entained copies of tiuality assurance chief for hesting Power Ca.'s Midland Nuclear Plant documents which Indicate that Zack and wentuation construction at the project may have budt safety relat. repeatedly failed te keep track of plant. " m ni equipment with substandard ma. the quahty of its raw materials in taenard said he told an NRC te irrs&ls, and the Nuclear Regulatory tMI. The ventMating equipment is spector Of Zack's record-keeptag .] t'ammissen is envestigating the 6mportant because it must supply protdems. NRC offletals said they serm int pousble traud. 1u clean att to the control room la an couldnotimmediatelycon(trm that, The target of the probe is Zack emergency. The NRC launched ita probe after ( l s'n. a Chicago firm which bunds The NRC requires E.ck te keep four former Zack employees heating, ventilation and air cond6. accurate records of the materials charged that the company hasa'l tening equipment for three Mid. used in that ductwork to prove that selved record 4eeping problems. l \ .
~. A l mestern nuclear plants. It meets standards for nuclear The workers. assigned to the re-j "We have indicahons of possible construction. 4 ' ,\.
- coffs efflee at Zack's Chicago head- 11 t forgtry of documents." said Jan Consumers Power was aware last qucters, were dismissed Apru 30. *
/1 < ~*
harasma. a spokesman far the year that a Zack official had Lam- That was two weeks after one com. ' hitC's Chacago office. pered withine records. The NRC wants to determine The utd ty decided P.ot to make an the records. Stained le Consumers Power 8 bout ' I
* 'M
~ b *'
W O
nether Zack is gelty of " fraud efficial repori ts the NRC after re- i Zack would not discuss the dis- ll : m k h g e missals when The News asked .' k lllw g;g
" y about them. The workers suspect y'
] lI & '
3 C, Qf they were fired for talking to Con-3 i
%rI aumers Power. .%
' Q 3 tu Before the workers were fired.
they copied uporu and ietters trom
.jw[.17 3
]
Sa S 7 q 7ack to Censumers. Strasma sa6d the NRC was " gen. ,e-* bp p/ p D$
, , erally aware" of Zack's problems i; Best year. although it did not act r e 3 rlS a 3 T O.. * ..I O n
. Consumers Power effletals say 1 j s e
they are sorting through Zack's re. ?,', \ .*' j 87 Dave SEDGWICK ber. Howard became qualuy assur cords at the construction site and No.s Statt Wrne' ance supervi.et - b effect, the that any unsafe ductwork w!!! be (D
~* @ . . b ^
! CillCACO - A termer Zact Co. chief clert of Zact's documents de replacederretafected. { s. emplece has charge!that Censum partmentinChacago. The fues were badly disordered. entheeBrgations. Zack officials wound ast cornment .I
#*'. ~I ers Power Co. taded to protect him Howard se6d. Amethy Zack CusterR9F == !!!Inole frern retaliation after he blew the "The papers were all ever the Power & Light - hss slapped a
!h; .I
( unistle on shoddy record 4eeping place-clumps stuffed la a safe.en step work order en Esck. sekoc h is practices. 9 3%p ,3 desks and piles and piles la a con Involved in construct 6en at the pow. Albert T. Howard, a former ferencersom."Howardsaid, ochaottescher. was dismissed April Ms. Marelle confirmed Heword's plant site. et coatpany's Ctlaten. Il4 nuclear !; I 6 di i i i e
*f eath three other werttrl = or>fy 3*eguat. "When I get there. It was At the LA$alle plant la Ullaels.the P l tus weeks after he te'.4 uttilty ef!k just a big mess. The papers were NRC had ruled that Zack's record. '
f esals thi4 Zack could as4 4ttp tr6ck pGedlate a vault."shesaid. keeping problems were tee aninerle '
,ef thequalityofitsmaterials. Heward and Ms. Marelle att3 delay Coermenwealth Edisea's ep- ]
l Zack, which builds heatleg and theyhelped QualNy AssursaceMaa eraung license. The NRC has re- ) , land venidating Nuclear Plant equipment Project must ides.for Slewty, the %Iid ager Dav6d they saanaged Calkinsuld.stit through the opened Its probe of the to lo plant.Stravna , ? antL.aSalle Inside t i keep records to prove its material cale documents. and sent letters to The four whistleelewers - Albert meets fed:tal standards. supp16ers seeking missing test re 7. Howard, Sharoe I., Merelle. A shroud (fore 0round) protects a teacto' l licward tas4sts-he receive (tanks aarts, the feraser Zark evapicyeve Mark Clee.and Ct. artes Grsrt t!! . ... ' Midland Nuclear Plant, scheduttd te co is en guarances tsiat Llie uulity would said. , Co. are visible on the tar waN of the
- Leot their case to the NRC la ,
pretcet him. "I wouldn1 have done Zack engineers alas tested easte May. Commissnon is intestigsting Zaca's raco l itSeus otherwise." lloward told the of the materials themselves. If the la a phone interview with the by CurtLeece)
- suppliers could not flad their qual. News. Howard claimed the NRC i The utdaty has a pohey that pro ity.testresults, downplayed their complaints. se the ,
I terts uhastle blowers. said Consum- the cierts began te noticeirregu four decided to take theft case te , ers Pau er spokesman Norm 5aari, larttles la the fues as they put them the media. A Chicago televislea sta-
**lt as a clesrly stated potecy that leerder.theysaid. flee alred their story Thursday .
l an empleyce es Potected against Howard and the others said they otghtendtoday. . Y
=
j represat Isr mdeng an allegation. (Id not witness anyone la the act of This isn't Zack's first brush with w ** O 7 "P & i e are not comment 6ag on other istging er tampering with the NRC- er with whistle-blewers. pernonnet matters."said ssart. documents. la 1980, former quality. control in. " Q { l V la phone intervi6as with the Lut Howard said that after the spector Dean Dartey pub!!cly Nees. Htward Sharon Marelle and records team had reviewed seed charged that Zack failed to correct BY KAYE ROSS law to a lot more mone-l i thrles Grant I!! att discussed their stored C#uments they would re- laultyweldsenits ductwort. News Staff Writer have beene meetving fre maildre dismissal from Zack. Mart t:arn to the files and find that la.;er- Disuict Court t' anne another Zaet worter who mattenhadbeenadded.
.Zack had fired Datter aner he was caught smuggling Zac's docu. t.ANSING - 'she llDrary potreng The appeals panel up was desmessed.
forcomment. could not be reached Early this year, floward dis- mesta frere the Midland site, of Saginaw today can thank the brettes'victoryla the su MichiganCourtef A9 peals. Sles which may have After Zack hered him last Octe. Please see EMPLOYEE.Page A-2 Please see PRO 8E.Page A.3 Thursday, a thheiudge panel ramiflestionsstatewide, a ended a " War and Peace'*-length .The library system f legal battle by rullag t%at the Public Saginaw County Circuit g!{g
. e ny ygngg llll yQ - , Libtartes of Saginaw a re entitled by 14. If7s. seeting a tull The Saginaw News - 7/23/82 ,
; 1
- ins reawd sa.mpayer complatnte reportag, enfarcement and .... *s w..ua.p. e n v.veeen ten saws enre rana wies ressive taignuy become eligele for Medicare bene. smaller checks ss a result of the
~M D '" fits Et the t egmning ti the month SenaL3 b634, whtC2 requires the gov.
.
- Wgter cenpbyer contributions to the unemida; raans compensa. thevturn65 ernment to "round down" actual 1 tientund yhe Senate also ag eed to allow monthly beneftt amounts to the nest
- modslocateen of the controverstal " safe harbor" ts leasing private lasurance cornpan6es to be- lowerwhole dollar. J grswesion of last year's tas cut till that permits s,r@rofitsbie come the primary heanh care pro.
Hm7aneet lo sell thN umssed anvestment tan credits to profitable The Senate already is being sent - i firms to reduce thetr tat wability. v, der for the working elderly, with the second half of the legislation Medicare as a back up insurance needed to implement the $27.2 bil. plan. Ilon in. spending cuts mandated in Q e Pataents who receive home health the 19g3 budget resolution, which care for the first time would be Congrese approvedlast month. Contenued from page A 1 in the company's Chicago office, nquind te pay lw a pwton of their TM Senate Budget .Commluce Calktos sent a progress report to medscal servicu aner me twatkth Thursday apprend and sent to the After a probe, the NRC tined Con- the stuit es Oct. 23. At that point, visit. full serate an omntbus bill contain-FRID AY an wmcrs Power 538.000 for Zack's accordme to Calkins* report. he had The Senate also agreed to ing 512.2 billion ln wide-ranging MYU pnor quainy assurance program. rewtewed about Iw* thirds of thechanges en elective portion of Medi. spendtng cuts over the next thr" And en August 1981, Consumers documents. care coverage known as "part B," years 81 btition more than was at1 l'ower reorgansted its staff to I,ght. ' His analysis revcs*sd thet: wheeh reetpeents pay far through de- mandated in snose areas Dy the bud- **N THE CI en controls an construction worit.
- On some purchase orders Zack ductions in their monthly Social Se geteucine.
But documents show that Zack's failed to tell manufacturers that theCurtly Checks. Of the 512.2 bution la cuts made in AP quihty<ontrol problems persasted materials would be used for safety. The monthly premiums would be ' the bill 19 percent come from limit
- Off evsn titer the NRCime. related work in nuclear plants. set at 25 penent of program costa. ing costeng 6nenases in bene Federal regulations require a Zack had contacted those vendors The effect would be to raise the fit payments for federal retirees, FALL FAS
" paper trad"of documents to prove and saked them to provide proof curnnt monthly premium by about both multary and civulan, to e per-the ressabdity of materials used in they property tested their materi le cents to 512.30 best.ining 0-t.1, cent a yeart eliminating scheduled seclest plants. als. But not all manuf acturers could 1982. and more in the future years increases in muk price support lev.
For any matenal used lor safety- comply w6th the request. The report as program costs rise. els; and increasing Federal Hous-related construction, tr.spectors listed UJ.Steet as one ezample. The largest single change in the ing Association mortgage insurance must be atde to trace each metat
- A Zack official tampered with Medicare reduction package would premiumcollections. g stem haca to the furnace in which 44 some documents 30 they would indl com from a hospital cost contain- The House Veterans Affairs Com- g, wascreated.Thosedocumentsmust cate proper test results, even ment Plan that would timit the an- mittee, the only House committee prove the part as " traceable." and though the proof was missing. Infor aust increase in Medicare so far to have met its budget tar. g aina that it meets qualaty standards. mation was erased on some forms payments for three years untd a gets, approved a measure Thursday in Jzne 1941 Zack hired David and handwritten additions were major Medicare reimbursement re- that includes imposing a user fee -- 4,Pr Canins, a former wesunghouse em- made on others. Calkins indicated. form package can be developed. e.5 percent or an average of about eve piryee, to put into order documents
- Some reports lacked the properThat poruon la projected to save Ms3 addtd to the closang costs of a data to show materials had been LIBRARIES Continued fctm Page A.t air.ocumenta as se,,o.s ,,.m aO "eyn"te:"c::*l. EMPLOYEE tero programmauc nature " but assert. Continued from PaGe A.t Leonard said he discussed the ed that *. hey eM not udanger m ,
braries end lawlibrartes charges with Zack managemnt, ' N trhen disinct courts were institut. Melearplaata' sew. W MconM W ng pem wnhout mak.g W wmMow. b ed, the judges acquired the power to Among other things, Calklas with company President Christwe er'sidentity. SNIPP'S CONNECTICI set the tmount of fees, fines and promised M*at Zack would eftee its Zack DeZutet. Nothing came of the And Howard has admltted he cerJs-End theirsubsequent alleca. empicyees a training program on talk said Howard. So in March, he mentlened his allegations to tion documstauen. The company also approached a Consumers Power of. Calkins.
' The librarms in Saginaw filed eutt would hire mors workers to sort the incialto discuss Zack's problems. April 16, Mm. DeZutel issued a la 1976 claiming the judges had ments. Calkbs added that "the M. Many he made an ofHetal alle. Wstedag mm to the ofHce work-wt.atued away at .their share of the apensible ladividualtst" who falst gauon by Wne to Censumers Pow. ers, warning against any uncuthor*
E" ybNak men fled documents was identified and er's Hank Leonard April 15. taed use of documents. Two weeks Shop Dolly 10 9* Sun' g g nt 8'"*'*0* Laenard, a member of the power later, said Howard, he and his col.
" tests
- rather a" fines .t Offletals of the male centracter company's Midland Project Quality leagues were dismissed, with about Corner Boyg fittobewei Oy 1979. the costs represented for the Midland project - Bec%tel Assurance Department, visited tweheurs* notice.
thout O percent of the total as. Corp. met with Consumer $ Power Zack's Chicago office to investigate. % Miles West of l.675 Est Zack officials had no comment. p% g messed court patrons and fines had and Zack Nov. 3 to d4Ns4 Calkins* shruna u about Il percent of the Dndmas. Bzy YWCA hosts total. la 1979 the libraries received le a fonow-up leuer dated Dec4 hst s45.coc out of a totalof se:4'eso . a saNas official concluded that Cheerleader UrlitS
- Dunng a lengthy legal battie the Zack's led of test muNs for some Ilbranes fought for and won an "or. Registredoes for a three day pom unatedals pened httle hasard to the pas and cheerteading camp may be der of supertatending control" - auclearplant.
"I I*** 'A made at the Bay County YWCA.
throg$3 wh6Ch a Circual Court judge 8P' could heir the case and overru!e Pamtimmelsesure. It will be held from 8:3o a.m. to I noon Aug.1518 at 5405 El, Midland any teench. esetsions made by the lower Howard told the News he had Road. Bay City. Karen Blataltis, warned Zack management earty Crector of Mid American Pom Pe 7: ad pa6edice,-0.e c4a wae tbis year that itssreceribepl.:g het w;:t-tonduct the Wogrars. . =**
- tralsferred to 47th Circuit Judge was sheddy. Howard, a sermer There is open swimming after each Cizar J. Hoehn. He heard evidence schoolteacher stie joined the com. day'saession.Thefeels sif.
in a hench inal on Jan. 29.1900, and. pany in October. decided to take his issud an opmion in the labraries case te Consumers Power, fiver Apnl13. l90s. With the support of his three co. llecha mied that the libraries workers. Howard made an offletal nt iE HU g gesLU k , were rig: tit en arguing that they alleganon to Leonard. IAenard told should receive the bulk of all "etytt. The News he seede two trips to Arthur H. Beyer. 67 nkenmuth, l airactson** fancs assessed in traffic Zack's headquarter 4 and ordered an casc* Richard D. Wallace. 69 uditef tkrecords fic founst that the constitution al. Saginaw. _ tamed the setting of fees and costs According to Leonard, the aud4 James C. Kanary Sr 72, anly hath enough to directly com. tumd up ne MatWmaud. Saginaw. gernsate int the cost of each partacu. w.w e a ~ - , l The Srginaw News - 7/23/82
~
$f" a
.l f.Q j
6
~
ntrol - gp3
~
!ack would ping, said b ')s .Iff' rs Powsrs' for heating bs
* '^ ',
tion at the ,, , rp .. ; e , , - ~. Nis
.n NRC in-rd keeping
\ '
I'
, 5 said th27 L -
n i ifirm that. *
\ %. d, D !
)tobe after - ;
3' ' Tiployees T - - 4 }j p! f. I [ [. ny hasn't 1, , c .w.. .n. y , r blems. o f..
', $- I "
J ' ' g to the re- ' I ;t{ f i,*.;} l cago head-
-e 'g. p i April 30.
r one com-d <
..lf h ; #
swer about
,/ . / '.n! .
i .,
.... ,[j i g -
_ s ,
#g, ,
;s the dis. -
NE -
'd i'I "# -
ws asked $, k h 'N E.k ' rs suspect .w: b a ag to Con- M i r
~ D<;
Y M. ' p :. tiersf m [ .
- h, -
was " gen-t a,
')}
..;fp
%r probitms 7" A's, .
% a ,
d not cet . y i
' ' ^
!cials say I - i I g
- . i Zack's re- ;3 .41 e . . ;
.a Dg2k@' '
i site End f - k will be { pQ{cf g.y,;.% %; A }'i ;, i yt p.v,7 M . &.. h> commtat ;;g 47 , ai. .
- Illinois ifapped a 'h
-{.w-I E+ j p^',
/i,
. . ,g *g
.i l
![he pow ,
. nucsEar' ' }; '
~~" ;
. . , ( S y f (....- -
linois, the
's reccrd-
,7 it kfy,k i.
i i minor 13 b s
/4c4 ison's op.
I has re-usane Inside the nuclearplant The Saginaw News - 7/23/82 ha el o A shroud (foreground) protects a reactor structure from contamination at the $3.4 billion ; Grtnt III Midland Nuclear Plant, scheduled to go into service in 1983. Ventilation ducts built by Zack NRC in Co. are visible on the far wall of the containment building. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is investigating Zack's records on materials used in the pipes. (News Photo with the by Curt Leece) the NRC ts, so the i-sy; A3 3ea s juc c es ru e courts rom ci:y liararies
= xe3:cas,
>ntrol in- ;
~ ~~ ** * ~ ~ ~ * * ' '
La Sall- nuclear plant gets new safety By Barbara Shulgasser thought lloward's inforriation pertained only to the Midland
""d'## E"*" E'""' I" E"" 8"""'"* E'UI
Anti-stuclear activists won a small battle last week in the war to prevent the opening of Commonwealth Edison Co.*s I a dlan was not humMaMy inn'sdgated eHlier. MaraWo . Salle nuclear plant, one of three plants the utlhty is building '" " ' "' " ' P" " " '
. ;in the face of declining growth in power needs. *o three Edison offic:sts expect I.a Salle, located 60 miles southwest g[y g
",',d,said. P' "" " *"'"
of Chicago, to start producing power in September and say g, ,*rs]g se ned ea .
!ck*gsnce, )nc.
delays would cost about $600.000 a day-tosts that would be Cordell Williams, one ni the NRC investigators who met wrumoTore. o c. aooc t ' pamd on to onsumer whh lloward in May, at first said th48 Iloward did talk about iront Edit Other - y ,,,, I a Salle. When told Marabito said only. Midland was men- pc.go Pogo Pogo j postponed nivsrJing the ~32.5 billlori la Salle plant 'a fu!I donM. WHuanis redsed tils statenient and said Howaid operating license 80 allow further in- seemed principally concerned with Midland.
'" * * ' ' " ' ' " " ' ' " "' 9"* "' Y * " '**
CllICAGO. ILLIll0IS ,# vestigations into allegations first ralwd E four months ago. d"*"'""'"*"" ' **' W' "U E"E" *" * ""U I SUll-TIMES Calc #g "'
@ Critics prompted ti.e renewed inves- @ sman amn scat
[
- tigation by claiming that quality con- "The feds say you can have any [ quality ofl suaterial yor M0 LINING - 675,995 l trol used in thc heating. ventilation and
' want, but you better have the piece of paper in your file to SUllPAY - 710,633 e air-conditioning systems was faulty. prove that it's what you want." Toscas said. When faulty
- The NRC already had completed one paper work was discovered. Edison called all the suppHers to
*gJ e sp,lashead ; investigallon into r.Hegations by work- confirm the equipment was standard commercial grade. ,
. . gf)O S ( ers that thousands of holes drilled into Toscas said.
concrete weakened the structure that lie added that none of the systems in questlori directly a so said c nere i i e ct$nt 1is allects the safety of the plant-a notion the NRC disputes. d- . In case of emergency-surh as an earthquake-the heating, , n RC re it Ju D couttudtd unuladon and ak conduloning utust maintain haWaW these claims either were untrue or did "'E"*'"'"I""*" " " " " " I "I indiation. Marabito said. had loaded vmclear fucI and a o eat s$g a r vrf i The NRC win meet in Washington ihursday to reconsider testlug. After the fiist investigation, the NRC granted pessnis- the connpany's request sur a tull. power license. And mos. sion to go to 5 percent power. obscryers say a denial of the liccuse would bc.a surprise. The current invesugation will examine allegations by ~~ employees of the Zack Co.. of Cicero, who say workens falsified documentation on the quality el matuials used in heating, ventilating and air conditioning. The.informaHon was taken to the NRC last Elay by tormer Zack quahiy control employee Terry llowand, but no attion was taken until last week, when lloward spoke to WMAQ 1V
- news. Iloward was fired after he made his allegatiores Zath Co. declined to comment.
NRC spokesman Russ Maratuto said the NHt' at lu st
. a . -- - - --
M v. G
\
lilinois Press Ass:ciation (Prsss Ssevices ine1 1035 Outer Park D oe Sprmgfield. IL 62704 2171793 0070 KANKAKEE Journal 33,238 0
*1
. e V -
g
' The Daily Joernal, Kankalme, IIL, Enday, July 26, 1982 $
Public interest group urges probe 3 into new LaSalle nuke plant charges By Jennifer Small Journal WasNngton bureau [ ' Theclearing week Midwest office's repo~ allegations rt last at of construc- nuclear Midland, plants in Clinton, Ill, and office to discuss the potential problem. Mich. A spokseman for 2ack could not be WASHINGMN - A public laterest tion problems at the $2.5 billion The allegations include charges of reached for comment. group today urged the Nuclear LaSalle facilit failed to adequately missing records on quality assurance Jan Strasma, a spokesman for the Regulatory Commi= ion to inveWs address the pbnt's safety questions, programs and purchase orders to NRCs Midwest office, said last week charges of false documents pertaining the CAP letter said. falsification of these documents while an investigation would he launched on to the air handling systems at the Thomas Devine, GAP legal director corrections were being made. the allegations concerning Zack's LaSali.? nuclear power plant before it and a co-author of the letter, was more. Albert Howard and Sharon Marello, work. a s11 owed to go fully on line. blunt in describing that report to a who worked at Zack's Document Even if true, however, Strasma said news conference in Washington: In a latter te NRC Chairman Nunzio Control Room.from October,1981, to the charges were "not of sufficient
/ Palladino, the Government Account- coverup," "ne report was a whitewash - a April,1982, said they could not say safety sinniru-* to merit continueo he said.
f aDility Prcject also asked that the whether LaSalle would be unsafe with restriction of power level (at the ne news conference today focused faulty records on its air handling plant)." federal NRC Office of Inspector and on allegations made by former em- systems. ' Auditor investigate the performance of ployes of The Zack Co., of Cicero. Devine said the NRC is expected to But, they said they were dismissed decide soon whether to allow LaSalle, l thepection NRC's andMidwest Enforcement.Office of which did the heating, ventillating and from Zack because they " knew too which has been stalled at the te air conditioning work at LaSalle, and much" and went to the NRCs Midwest stage, to operate at full pow e
~
mummmmmme m - 1
4 NRC delays licensing of By Jennifer Small WASHINGTON - The Nuclear ion has pas ( LaSalle ant P), a Washington public'inlirest; ha auclear power plant pending an d al a " [f The charges include allegations that investigation into charges of improper improper and falsified documents NRC officials kno 1 d that documentation By,a 2-2 vote Tuesday, the.JW by eraa contractor, plant contractor tq Commonwealth Edi-commisaloners decided to statt until son Co., which owns the LaSalle plant. were supplied by The
' " Zack Co., a Aug. 5 before voting on. anhalter to they describd it as a problem issue a full power .4kenteU4o the AlbertGAP said%a~c Howard, a foriner' the complaints 2emselm. made b[ g,vog og documents rade controversial $2.5 billion, plant.
In so doing' the commesleners went employe, to the NRC's Midwest office,, j,,,, contend that the documents were not addressed in the NRC's July g,, a demonstration of disregard against the advice of Harold Doeton,19 report clearing LaSalle of separate g as y Com director ,e Nuclear of the NRC Reactor s Office of Regulation charges of faulty construction work. wh.i and al q tb s James Keppler, NRC's Midwest cluded, after talking with Howard, thatKeppler, however, said als staff con-administrator, The two recoenmended the commissioners immediately by Zack at a nuclear plant in Midland, properly'NRC sees the problem as his main concern was with work done "The tpprove a full power license, subject whether or not the components are to satisfactory resolution of the tcant concerns with LaSalle."Mich., and that be "did not have signif . right," said Bri investigation. of Illinois Friends of the Earth, an Keppler said questions concerning twice previously investigated prob-Since Commonweatlh Edison on the LaSalle plant issue. "The real the safety of materials in LaSallt's lems of Zack's heating, ventillating and air condition- documentation, Keppler said, "We had installation and issue here is the utter contempt Ang system could soon be clartfied b which Zack and Comed treat the rulcs additional interviews and a chemicalY no reason to keep the plant down any and regulation of the NRC." longer." apalysis of the materials involved. But Ms. Rorem, of Esses, said she The NRC then allowed LaSalle to was pleased with the NRC delay and sat y ur Ke r told hv'ej - g{e 6 en the commissionen. e . 3 ' But, he said, the heat and air system Howard, however, said he 'I gy - emphasised the problems at LaSalle , er way the wind blows to accommo , does not warrant the same kind of when be met with Keppler's staff, andda 2e ne concern as more critical systems, even left accompanying records. g e been found though one-third of its equipment Keppler said it was not until lie was with the quality-control records on' affects the plant's safety.
"There have been questions raised Interviewed by a Chicago TV station Zack's air-conditioning and ventilation-whether the material can meet its that he became aware of the full ex. work at Illinois Power Co.'s Clin ,
safety functions. These allegations tent of Howard's concerns, re ted in {lant,10.2 percent of which is o , seem to come in on a continuous ba* documents supplied by GA 2 the y a sup gofdb8 " NRC tim Eas ern sis," LaSalle Kebpler sala, suggesting that Since the TV interview last Thun. Power Coop, which serves Iroquois. treated like any licensed day, Keppler said he has sent and neighboring counties. punt which becomes subject to safety additions) inspectors to Zack, and charges. However, officials did say an ordered tests on the materials in the lit nois Press Association --- _ _c5 earthquake or tremor could shake heat and air handling system. (Press sernes h) Io35 0 uter Park Drive loose faulty ventilation and air-condi- Commonwealth Edison Vice Presi- sormat.eid. it 62704 ' tioning equipment. If that happened dent Cordell Reed told Small 217/7930070 . during a critical accident, they said, Newspapers there is "nothing new" in KANKAKEE radiation conceivably could get into the latest allegations against Zack, Journal the plant's control room and hamper
- which he said had all been reviewed. 33,238 0 Reed complained that each day of operaton' emergency.1 ability to respond to the , delay is costing the utility's electric Commissioner John Ahearne agreed customers about 3600,000 in higher fuel the NRC should not stop licensing pro costs associated with burning coal as g p g gkn ceedings because "a large amount of an alternative.
paperwork flows in at the last safety "We have great confidence in the - minute." of the plant," Reed said But before going ahead with Denton, however, said, "We have te i LaSalle, Ahearne said, "I find there imake sure Commonwealth Edison'4 l tre enough issues I would like answers to." At issue are a list of charges mailed Mcnday to the NRC from the Government Accountability Project,
\
\
/ . a Ventilation vitalto nuke safety & la a home, a well-functionnag air- mattweilife ardeath, under lovendgation at the Commba-
- enditioneris a matterof comfort. 'Ihe v ntilation system of a muetaar wealth Edloon f m.una County Nuclear In a nuclear power plant,it may be a power plant, such as the system now Station, is just one of several systems
- sonngt.eid. st 62704 that pated; tise operators from ex.
217/793 0070 po,gre to deadly air-borne radiation. STREATOR 'the heating, v an='h and air! Times Press canditioning units at i Ahne are, ac- " 11,904 0 cording to a " Reporter's Guide"
. pubbshed by Comed, an "engmond rovra', n.H. .IU L 2 41%2 **$Ty , .gg,,,, i,
'.'0;TEP ' S DEt:0CRAT , depth" cancept of poww plan design, which, accordmg to Comed, "is used
""~ v"3 . M,053 to build smaclear power plants with .
rediadant safety systems and barriers to prevent or arrest postulated ac-cidents up to and including those M rd( %. deemed ' incredible."'
'lhe ventilation systems, Comed
. ~~ . ,a ss stat.. -. ad.,ua,.
~~ ~ ~~ u- a- c~~e 1C Si e 31*e.VOU OR.9
/ contrat for the control room," wha the plant operators work.
Have you decideil whose side you are on in the current ^ 188 N"Ed docment fHed with
-j'j * %~,"'y deba'e t between the Public Utilities Commission.and the
'su blic Service Company of New Hampshire over the tunnon symem moscars rwioacdve ompletion of Seabrook II? contarrinadon and filters the er of As of today the state walts for the reaction from PSNH potentialcantami= ants
.) the PUC ruling late last week that Seabrook II would 'the control room system assume have to stop because the company will not be allowed to th'"
g %gtersg are raise any more money for construction. ,,i,,,,, ,,io ,se ,, ,,,i,,eggy ,g ,,,,, There are, rumblings of court proceedings, massive the don at dates. 'nie control room layoffs, significant blows to the Seacoast economy and system also assures that the centro
" huge increases in power costs" (Our emphasis added). room can be maintained as a backup Atleast these are the attitudes of supporters of PSNH. comeriacen dan accident.
- venn '*
l Those supporting PUC say similar things. . . millions of u om h wasted dollars being poured into Seabrook and the need puter storage room and the auxilary to protect ratepayers from a " huge increase in power electrical-~_ room.
.oets" (Look f amiliar?). Robert Pollard, nuclear safety So, if you're just a regular, down-to-earth person engineer. at the .washingta, p.c..
bu nion ins ying to get by and understand things in this ever com- ,,,,ed I licated world we ve engineered, it won t be any comfort disons am as importam to audley
) you to know that there is no easy way to make a deci- eier:ricat equipment fusedoes as they lon. As you see, those supporting the PUC and those eretohumantile.
"If the temperature varios outside of I pporting Public Service Company both predict disas- ben
- r. Well, disaster of a type. The question in this pro and n debate is not whether the place will blow up in our tTemperatures to%pment degrees above its ces, but rather whether the economy of New Ham- limits win cause e maeun. to map, sire will blow up because of the costs of Seabrook. In } besaid.
er words, this current disaster all comes down to - I mey. l .n a way, we suppose this debate ought to be comfort- ' g, and perhaps a little humorous. At least in this argu- , int the Nukes and Anti-Nukes do agree on something: &j ry expect a disaster. ind the common thread in their predictions of disaster that it is going to come out of our pockets. So, what se is new?
}ll l
lilinois Press Association - (Press Swwees ine.) 1035 Outer Park Drive Sormgf rrad. IL 62704 2171793 0070 STREATOR Times Press 11,904 D JUL 2 3 L982 Ventilation at LaSalle# plant studied by XRC By Red Perlmutter . the NRC has "no tMcal basis for chased for au three plants lacked the Mmes-Press Writer asying the plant is ready for required testing laformation to prove operatissi." -" that the equipment was safe. Some L 'the Nuclear Reaulatory Commis. "No one went back and examinied material was purchased without any
-man utvestraationjata t5rzack Co., the the equipment, all they did was shufDe certification whatsoever. ,
contracsor mat built the heating, ven. . paper," said Pollard . "'Ihese errors and inconsistencies ilation and air conditioning system at ' And the paper they shuffled was made the material certifications
.he Commonwealth Edison LaSalle suspect, mA to the quality as- suspect and, by impi! cation, the County Nuclear Station, comes less aurancemanagerof the Zack Co. rnaterialsuspect,"Calkins wrote.
than three months after an NRC to- Records filed with the NRC by Zack Pollard said the materials were spectar said the company's records quality assurance saanager David - morethansuspect. werele compliance. Calkins on Oct. 26,1981, concerned the "'Das documanea do not say that the One day after an AprG 18 lespecdon 4p-JLM. _Waar** the NRC granted <=npany's sysNns at 14SaBe lamenitas' in tof ., , hep,,patehais areensafe," Pollard seM. as #di as "But there is ne verifienties that-tne ComFEErestricTed L. e a ._ tan and waan,e, ~ Mich, nuclear materials are safe. And in the absence testing at the laSalle plant, ard to load stations. 8-
~
~.af pesaf that (eemetruction) matarsals it with reehdettoetsett During that construction period, are sade, the NRC should not issue an But, accordlag to k fornaer NRC Calkms wrote, "there has been a l (,i ^*-_d license."
j greject manager, the plant should not breakdown of the quauty assurance 'lhe purchase orders not only were have rersived a license at that time, program reIated to (NRC rainmine information, C=1 kins wrote; har== Wescott did not check to see if requirements) on pure')ased material, some had also been a'tered after pur-he equipment purchased by Zack did equipment and services." chases had been made.
- m. fact hve up to NRC i=;-- -- ^=_ - Materials purchased for nuclear He said he found certifications on
--d the inspector relied on Zack plants have to be made and tested ac- purchase orders were altered by han-
= that the company admits cording to standards recoenized by the d-written or typed additions, and on akered and possibly*ctged. NRC. Each building material is or- some documents, numbers were Robert Pollard, nuclear safety dered by specific ladiestry cor. whited out. Gummed la5cis were for the Washington, D.C.- tifications placed on purchase orders that were Union of Concerned Scientists But, calklas wrote, several purchase sent back to suppliers, with the "cor-an NRC project manager from orders wem completed with discrepan- rect" certification information, he GB to 1F16, said today that because of cies and ruissing information concer- reported.
e laariarluate inspection ty Wescutt, ning certification. Materials pur- Continued on page 2 l
~
u ,
* 'i--
g g ,. ,, ) } h . . t. . ?!.Y
- h ') ,
INRC investigation
~ Cseeinsed from pagpe However, in a Sept. 21,1981 response,
- m orders wei, autherised by sig.
U.S. Steel officer supervisor Gerald . Peters wrote back that had Zack infor. l wkh "W h med them that the steel waotrbe ticity,,,Calkias wmte, ogy ,,it would lieve nsa the '
'!he reason behind the alterations. requiredtests onit.
Pollard said, may have been to protect **1hese orders were not called in to l the Zack Co. Zack officials seat letters our r' ;--- as ' safety related,' l to its snamulacturers requesting that Peters letter states. "'!herefore, they
- l. previous purchases be certified la ac- were handed in our normal procedure cordance to NRC.- ;---t --4 and not nm through our (verificaiton /
'Ihe prolplem, Pollard said, was that and testing) program. /
while some materials were bought and "Please advise us what is sneant by installed at plants in IW8, Zack of- the term " safety related" and what ' ficials were asidag the supplier to cor , obligation if any does this impose on tify INS materials to safety standards the supplier," Peters wrote.
===hn=hed years later for nuclear Comed & clear Communications plants. Mpari=He James Toscas said the NRC Some compames, such as U.S. Steel, 6d "a very thorough investigation of weresurpnsed by this request. ths imEana plant, checking not only rcAJ .In/d*gc$ce, Mnc.
la test, Zack officials wrote U.S. the paper work but also tiie equipment vacuisorou. o.c. eeer.s
, Steel requesting confirmation of orders itself." frone [da oth.r sent earlie that year. Zack stated ic Tooras said at most, the suspect Poo= Pese rose its letter tnat the confirmation orders mater'.fst would have been only 'to per-i were for the steel purchases were cent of what Zack constructed at the SANTA FE, N.M.
" safety rstated " 12Rane plani.
- NEW MEXICAN EVENING - 18,461 SUNDAY - 22,425 JUL 2 2 M .
- ~ Labs should be unaffected .
by fusion research delay l . ALBUQUERQUE (AP) - A 10 ment of Energy and the White House year delay on a government program Office of Science and Technology. say *; to develop nugitar, fugsto power they will continue to supply research-plants probably will not adversely af- ers with about $450 million a year
- feet fusion research at Sandla Na- about they same they currently ,
tional Laboratories, a laboratory of- receive. ficial says. But the officials no longer are in .
"There probably will be a lot of dis- terested in finishinC a demonstration '
appointed people, though," said fusion plant by the year 2000 and will Gerold Yonas, director of pulsed not step up the program because "the power sciences at thelab, government just doesn't have the . The delay on the $20 billion pro- money," said John Clarke, DOE's . gram probably would mainly affect fusion prcgram director, projects geared toward production of John Marcum, the science office's electric power, but Sandla's fu fon assistant director, said the need for . project is designed mainly for de- fusion power is not pressing. i fense purposer. he said. The world's oil and. natural gas ( , "Our inillat purpose is for defense, reserves willlast for at least another l
"C.
~~ '
, though our feeling is that we could 50 years, coal deposits will last for
- turn it towards the production of en- another 400 years and there are .
ergy in the long run," Yonas said, enough uranium reserves for several, He raid of ficials at the U.S. Depart- thousand years, he said. l %%
- 5 .
A /ab DRAFT .
- 1. Chose three safety-related valves M had worked on A. Two of four bolts on one connection loose
- 1. Checklist showed torqued to 50 f t. Ib. and QC inspected.
- 2. No maintenance.
- 11. Records Problems A. Copied pages, white out, missing QC signatures, unchanged data B. Out of Spec Data accepted by QC
,' Ill. Morrison calibrates for RCl and Zack - IV. Adequacy of CECO calib~ ration standard found outside specs. V. Loose bolt - motor to operator - Check all such bolts t. C. prior to going above ,0% 4 g ,._. Check all such bolts 0. C. prior to January 15, 1983 .wat , . ._m._ . I
. Based on engineering developed standards.
gtS y%M -
O rSM bOC A 1 bh UNOUALIFIED WELD PROBLEM System .. Failure Causes,Related Equipment Operator to " Unqualified Weld Cooling Cooling Failure
~
VX switchgear VG standby gas 1. System Live leads (fluid, treatment thermal) VE aux. elec. VC control room 2. System dead loads equip. rm. VY ump room VE aux. elec. 3. Seismic loads ' !
% equip. rm.
M VDA i sel gen. 4. Random rooms
. EVALUATION MATRIX System Failure Cause _. Remarks
- VG M5 N/A No unqualified welders VC 1&2 No problem - preop 3 No problem - fragility low, thermal lead time, air, low heat load '
4 Only a' small portion of duct is common - no welder problem in this area. VE. l' & 2 No problem,' pre-op 3 No problem, fragility low, same as for VC except Scott Air Pack 4' Same as VC
- VX 1&2 Pre-op l 3 Fragility, rooms are redundant
- 4 Fuel failure does not stop room cooling VY p ,N/A No unqualified welders [m Cid i VD / N/A No unqualified welders No ducts HPCI/ N/A No unqualified welders m -
4642N
-_-- ._ -- .__..____.-___--_---_M
3 g A }&7 Zack Company . ' Commoawealth Edison Quality Assurance Department Review of Government Accountability Project Submittal of 7/27/82 Commonwealth Edison was advised by the Nuc' lear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Staff on July'27,1982, of all allegations relating to improper handling of documentation by the Zack Compasy. These allegations were transmitted to NRC by the Government Accountability Proj ect (GAP) on July 26, 1982. The allegations deal specifically
- with certification documents for materials supplied by Zack in the ,
fabrication and installation of the heating, ventilating and air conditioning (HVAC) system at the LaSalle County Nuclear Station. This* memorandum deals with the review of the GAP submitted document package to determine if the Commonwealth Edison (CECO) Quality Assurance Department position regarding the acceptability of Zack documentation and the HVAC installation is. altered in any way as a result of the information included in the GAP submittal. CECO Q.A. Review of GAP Document Package The CECO Corporate Q. A. staff read and reviewed the entire GAP document package. In addition, the CECO Site Q.A. staff independently performed the same review. As a result of these reviews, it was determined that certain concerns highlighted in the GAP package, although not new to Q. A. , merit additional comments and, as such, are addressed in another section of this memorandum. In total, however, the Quality Assurance Department concluded the following 1:) Certain information internal to Zack, dealing with subjects such as wages, working hours, harassment, and Zack. audits was deemed to be new information by CECO , Q. A. ; however, this information does not directly impact on the quality of the duct system materials supplied by Zack for the LaSalle County Station. -The HVAC equipment and components were procured from o.ther vendors by CECO.
- 2) The 50.55(e) report made by CECO to the NRC prop.erly des ~c'ribed and adequately . addressed the-document problems for material supplied by Zack for the LaSalle County Station.
- 3) The information in the GAP document package does not negate the CECO Q. A. ' position regarding the acceptability of the duct system materials supplied and installed by Zack for LaSalle County Station.
Basis For CECO Q. A. Position - Disposition of Allegations A) ; Audits The CECO Q.A. Department performed extensive audits of Zack activities to assure conformance to specification and design requirements throughout the term of the Zack contract. 'At the i
i l
- LaSalle Site, Q.A. ggyformed 33 formal.Rudien during the nerio.d of 4 .
9/31/76 to 5/19/82. Attachment "A* lists the audits and number o~f deficient items identified by Commonwealth Edison which: were
=
corrected to ensure proper quality was provided. When it was found that deficiencies were sufficiently significant to have an adverse , impact on the HVAC installation, work at the site was stopped. Attachment _"B" lists the four occasions where it was necessary to stop work on the HVAC system installation at the LaSalle site until full corrective action was achie ved by Zack. In addition, during ~the ~ period June 1979 through June 1981 CECO instituted an independent IiisieEEi6ii of T00GT the W6ur weTdiWriTrhed %%C ~This' - inspTcitI5ii was performed by Conaii,~ an Independent te'sring' Agency. . Also, CECO _4A Jerformed four audits of the Zack corporate office, ~ ~~ l one in_1jl80 and._lsB1TridJCliE1952._, i . B) Surveillances ; ! Regularly scheduled surveillances were also performed of Zack's activities by CECO Q. A. During the_p eriod 11/19/76 to i 6/30/_8_2 305 surveillances were conducted ac3h'eTaS'a'11e[Sitie~ and 7
~~
at the Zicj d dii'6orite_.o gfce. W ii broad coverage, in additi6n to-
~
aualts, adds to the CECO confidence-level that proper quality has been achieved.
, C) 50.55(e) Investigation The documentation problems related to Zack in the CECO 50.55(e) report issued on 9/30/81 was a formalization of the concerns which were identifie d by CECO Q. A. as early as 8/25/80. Although the
- fully identified until magnitude September of the documentation 1981, problem CECO Q. A. had was not, documentation problems -
been identifying and obtaining resolution on a case by case basis since August 1980. This 50.55(e). report and. investigation further . demonstrates .that. the problems which CECO Q. A. had been working on were properly and fully reviewed and resolved. Moreover, the third party revie w by the NRC adds 'to the CECO confidence level that quality has been achieved. D) Information from Ron Perry On February 15, 1982 Mr. Ron Perry, an ex Commonwealth . Edison employee, working for Zack in their documentation group, called the CECO Manager of Qualiqy Assurance to give him a "first hand" report of concerns he observed. He felt that the major problems were in the areas of: lead auditors not qualified, material paperwork inadequate, purchases from unapproved vendors and the document vault not meeting ANSI N-45.2.9 requirements. The Manager Quality Assurance did not report Mr. Perry's call to Zack's management but, ~ as is appropriate and mandatory, investigated Mr. Perry's concerns by directing that a special audit of the Zack
- corporate activitia a be performed to determine if there were any other deficiencies that were not known as part of the 50.55(s) report CECO had previously filed
\ 1 w
\
+
.. y- .
4 . l I i s with NRC. TS February 18, 1982, a CECO Q. A. Supervisor and cognizant N Q.A. engineer from the LaSalle Site conducted an audit of the Zack '
< \s Corporate office to specifically evaluate the concerns reported by
' Mr. Perry. During the audit, .the lead auditor spoke to:Mr. Perry, showed him the audit checklist and the audit results and asked if he had any concerns other than those in the audit. He indicated that he had no additional concerns (See CECO Audit Re? ort #1-82-45) . He was invited to attend the audit exit maecing but he chose not to attend.
Two deficiencies were identified in the audit, one in the area of annual auditor evaluation and auditor qualification records,and one involving material traceability for a section of HVAC duct. Both items were resolved. The audit team concluded that no new serious concerns identifiedexisted and that the were adequately anddocument completely deficiencia covered in s previously(e) the 50.55 . On March 22, 1982, CECO Q.A. conducted another audit at Zacks corporate office to determine if the other Q, A. Program requirements were being implemented. Two deficiencias were identified, one in the area of control of revised documentation and
; the second in the area of, protection of quality assurance records.
As a result of the personal contact with Mr. Perry, CECO-QA . was aware of the details of his alligations prior to the submittal of the GAP document package. All of the concerns reported by Mr. Perry, who had first hand information, were examined by Edison auditors and were found to be either minor, being resolved or adequately .- disp ositioned. Furthermore, it was concluded from the Ceco i investigneon that, notwithstandinn the document defi,c_iencies._Mr. ~ i P~rn e_ 's alledations do not direct _1.y affect the qu'a11ty of ma_terla_l,s - supplied by Zack for 'LaSalle County StaAion. Commentscon' Specific Allegations Certain* concerns which were highlighted in the GAP submittal appear to merit further comment. Although^these concerns do not present new information for CECO Q. A. , exp.lanation as to the actions , taken by Edison regarding the concerns should help explain why Edison feels these concerns have been adequately addressed. a) Inadequate' Training l On October 9,1981, a aurveillance was performed by CECO ( Q. A. at Zack's corporate headquarters to review personnel
- qualifications for those individuals involved in document review, Mr/ Howard McGrane of the Midland Project Quality Assurance Department, who has 15 years of documentation experience, was in l
charge of the document group. In addition, three people on short term contract from Quan Tech were also working in the group. The qualifications of these individuals included resumes listing extensive experience and attendance sheets for informal training : sessions held at Zack. Two additional Zack employees were also being -
e l' t trained at that time. It was indicated that the two Zack individuals were brought in to eventually take over the documentation review once ' 2 the initial evaluation was completed. The work activity in the documentation group consisted of , matching material certification documents to purchase orders and ' assembling purchase order packets. In addition, the people were required to match certification data to established standards. For the most part, personnel with good clerical skills and a reasonable amount of on-the-job training should be able to perform the dutie s in the documentation group. The qualif.ications of the yeople in the 1 _ documentation group were viiwed To be 'suffiTie nffo'r the wTrk~ bis ~ing pertormeo. b) Purchases from Unapproved Vendors In Mr. Ron Perry's . statement to David Crow it is stated that "Mr. Perry compiled a list of P.O. 's reviewed by Delta Screw Co. while Delta was not on the list." Review of Exhibit 25 from the Government Accountability Project's information indicates that 38 hardware items involving ten purchase orders were let to Delta screw ! as follows: _ 12/22/81 34 entrias (8 Purchase Orders: #1589, 1590, 1591,
, 1592, 1593, 1594, 15,95, 1596) 1/06/82 1 entry (P.O. #1029) 2/01/82 3 entria s (P.O. #1717)
Total 33 entries (10 Purchase Orders)
.' Review ~ of Commonwealth $dison ' objective evidence gathered during Q.A. Audit 82-45 conducted on 2/18-19/82 indicates that Delta screw was suspended from.the Zack Approved Vendors List (AVL) on
~
10/20/81.' Further._th.e_q)Jegtive ~12/17/81 Zack document,gd, in a Memo-to-F4,e_ev_idence in.dicat_es_th'at on_c_onve r s l l {!I fhe posit _ ion M +==eanar atmp 14 ars 1.ika_. Delta _Snew are_ not ! required to anaalv =ararial certificationg for safety-relatid*, commercial eraYa Tararial. On 12/22781~eight of the ten piH~ chase
~
- k. oraers were issued. Review of the Zack records during this audit revealed no issuance of purchase orders after 10/20/8. and prior to 12/17/81. This was the period during which release of the purchase l orders would have been unacceptable per the Zack Q. A. Program as l Delta Screw was not deemed an approved vendor until the NRC position was'. received. Delta Screw was not officially placed back on the AVL unt'il 2/10/82 due to business related reasons.
l As attested by Mr. Perry, the Zack AVL was inaccurate but Zack appeared to be making a concerted effort to correct inaccuracie s at the time of the audit which has since been achieved. Judgement at the time of the audit was that Zack could purchase from Delta Screw on or after 12/17/82 upon receiving direction from'NRC and be in compliance with their Q. A. Program and 10CFR50, Appendix B.
. z _. . . . . . _ _ _ . . - - - . _ _ - _ . - - . . - . . -
~
- 5- -
\
Two specific clarifications of Terry Howard's affidavit ar6 in order at this point since on page 18 of his testimony he states . i that approximately 38 P.O. 's were issued when in f act Exhibit 25 indicates that 38.P.O. line entries were listed, but only' ten purchase orders were released. CECO Audit 82-45 revEswed the first eight of these ten documents and found them acceptable. Also, the audit referred to in Mr. Hovsrd's and Mr. Perry's affidavits as being conducted. on October 9,1981, was a surveillance strictly to evaulate the steps taken concerning Zack's notification of a poss1ble 10CER50.55(e) relating to documentation deficiencies. It was not an audit of the implementation of the Quality Assurance Program. c) LaSalle Documentation R'eview Completed - Based on Commonwealth Edison surveillances, it was determined that Zack's documentation review associated with the 50.55(e) report was being conducted in an orderly manner, using logs , , to document all purchase orders and associated certifications as the review was being performed. These logs showed all purchase orders used at the three nuclear sites 'plus those used to order stock material. The logs reflected the current status of each purchase order - that is, whether it was acceptable or not and the problems found. To further control this review effort, Zack placed in the I front of each purchase order packet a log sheet identifying the purchass orderproblems the specific number,found.the reviewer's conclusion (accept / reject). and ~ On October 9, 1981, the first interim report was submitted by Zack identifying the results of their review to date. Ceco Q.A.'s surveillance #81-661 dated 10-9-81 was conducted at the
- Zack Corporate office and the interim report was reviewed. During the surveillance both acceptable and rejectable purchase orders were reviewed using both the logs and interim. report to obtain the .
necessary purchase order information. The interim report' was found to be accurate - that is, it reflected the same information as provided within the logs. Only the problem purchase orders were identified within the surveillance, but many additional purchase orders were reviewed and found acceptable, as was the case for Zack's review. The surveillance was an attempt to acquire background on the types of deficiencies being identified by Zack. Many deficiencias were written for clerical errors where certificationsAlso, failed to identify the year for the applicable ASTM Standard. Zack was concerned about certifications failing to identify the term " ASTM" albhough A36 was provided on the certification. The A36 designation, per the ASME Code, also applies to ASTM specifications. Many of the problems identified under missing certification were actually I purchase orders written with requirements in excess of specification requirements for non-safety related/ commercial grade items. 7 2r. a s' ,
---_,._,-p__,, , _ _ . . _ , - _ , . , - - - ,
_ - - _ _ - - , _. __y ,_...-- _-_.___g - _ _ , _y__ _v_y-- . _ . .--
< i e*
Deficiencies for altered reports included cases of highlighted heat numbers, although an unaltered heat number was also , on.the certification. Finally, many cases were observed that identified certifications not per the S&L Specification. These i certifications were reviewed and found to cover better quality steel than was originally required by the Specification (that is, A36 , instead of A575 grade M-1020 commercial grade) . The use of higher ' grade materials would not create a safety deficiency. Based on this surveillance and Zack's many tracking j systems, CECO Q. A. felt that the spectrum of LaSalle purchase orders
- was being reviewed and properly dispositioned. Af ter Zack's review '
was finally completed, all problem purchase orders were transformed into Zack nonconformances and dispositioned. These were subsequently > reviewed to assure proper disposition, also on a documented CECO Surveillance # 82-225 dated 4-15-82. l d) Zack Document Control Non-existant Prior to Fall 1981 As part of Sharon L. 'Morello's affidavit contained in the GAP submittal, Ms. Morello states: . l " Prior to my arrival there had not been a formal Quality Assurance Documentation Control function. I J was told for years Zack had one person handling
. Quality Assurance, -but it did not have a documentation L
control department." Ms. Morello states, in part, that records at Zack were in disarray and that it took several weeks of effort before organization of .the documents could begin. She also saw no control of nuclear purchase orders beyond that imposed by Zack'for commercial orders.
~
~
Review of' the Q. A. audits performed at the Zack Corporate
- j office, from 1980 through 1982 (4 audits total) indicates that of the l 66 questions contained in the checklists, 17 questions addressed the areas of procurement documents, and procurement and document '
control. Two deficiencias were identifie d as the result of these reviews. In addition, review of the objective evidence contained in ! these audits indicates that even though a well organized and ekpertly implemented program of document control did not exist, the ! Laplementation of quality related activitie s with respect to document control at the Zack corporate headquarters was sufficiently adequate to implement the Zack Q. A. Program requirements. It was evident that i Zack, during 1980 and 1981 was attempting to upgrade their program l with varying degrees of success. But the judgement made, based on the objective evidente at the time or auditing, was enat ene Zact Program, from the s_tandpoint of doen= ant control. was surrica nt'Yot t_he type of materials and assemblies suoolied to the LaSalle Project. i ____z _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ _ _ _ , . - . _ _ _ _ _ _
l - 7_ e) Walder Q'ualification Deficiencies
. The concerns with documentation and discrepancies in welder qualification records covered in'the GAP submittal had been
__ identified by Commonwealth Edison Co. and corrective actions which relate to the disposition of these deficiencias have been taken to ensure the HVAC system installation is acceptable. ,
As a result of the various discrepancies identified through inspections, surveillances,and audits in connection with the HVAC system, a complete independent recheck of the quality of the installation was performed. In addition to Commonwealth Edison Company Quality Assurance surveillance and' audit involvement with Zack Company, specific surveillance, and inspection tasks involving Zack construction were assigned to the Conam Independent Testing' Agency by LaSalle Site Quality Assurance. Conam performs inspection and testing under. the direction of Ceco QA at LaSalle. The intent of these inspections or re-inspections of the Zack work, as well as other contractors, is to independently assure that contractor field activities are properly performed in accordance with applicable procedures, standards and design reg ~uirements and that the final installation ~is acceptable. The basic approach is that each site contractor has a total entity in that each contract includes responsibility for installation, quality control inspection and quality assurance with quality control over - inspections and quality assurance checks, surveillances and audits being done by, or for, Commonwealth Edison Company. For most cases, an over - inspection of from 5 to 10% of the various contractor's activitie s requiring inspection is performed. Where problems are identified, corrective actions are required of a contractor and the re-inspection activitie s by Commonwealth Edison are increased to as much as a-complete re-insaection where the circumstances warrant. After it is confirmed th'at the contractor has. undertaken the necessary corrective steps' such as developing and implementing procedures, training and qualifying involved personnel and verifying the Quality Control inspection functions are perfo.rmed acceptably to the satisfaction of CECO Site Quality Assurance, then the re-inspection performed by the Independent Testing Agency is reduced in step fashion as the results of the re-inspection justify as was done with Conam following the two year period of 100% re-inspection of Zack. In the case of Zack, the quality control inspections for accepting Zack welding at the site betweeen June 1979 and June 1981 were performed by Conam no matter whether Zack was or was not released from our "stop work" order to perform its own Quality Control inspections under its contract. i.e. the installed hangers were inspected, and repaired as required and then reinspected by Conam. Also, duct work was required to be inspected by Conam prior to being released for installation in the building between April 1980 and May 1982. Deficiencia s identified through inspections were covered by contractor non-conformance reports (NCR) for each affected hanger and otherwise for each other i. J
,. , . , . - . - - - --,..,n- - - - , -- -,.--
i deficient case. All seismic and safety-related hangers were treated as suspect and were inspected. Zack Quality Control (QC) inspected i each hanger and after Zack QC's acceptance, Conam repeated the complete inspection for acceptability which included inspection of all welds of the hangers. Any deficient welds identified by Conam were reported to Zack, corrected by Zack, inspected by Zack QC and then inspected by Conam. Conam's 100% re-inspection included inspection of welds for placement and quality and for. location of the hang er. Also, configuration checks on a random basis were made. In this period, most of the control room HVAC system was fully inspected by Conam after being inspected by Zack. Finally, system walkdown inspections were initiated by Zack in early 1982 to check. final acceptability. - Thus, work that may involve missing documents or J discrepancies in welder qualification records, even though such deficiencies are not acceptable, was inspected and ensured' to be acceptable. As for other HVAC equipment supplied by Commonwealth Edison, it was receipt inspected by Commonwealth Edison and again inspected by Zack when issued to them for installation and then inspected after installation by Conam. Attachment C is included to detail, in a summary fashion, Conam coverage of the Zack on-site installation activities. Up on notificatica by the Zack Company on September 25, 1981 of the possible 10CFR50.55(e) report with respect to supplier material Quality Assurance certification,)(CECO surveillance and mo.nitoring were intensified and directedactivitie s by toward this specific concern at the Zack corporate headquarters. Between 9/25/81
-and 4/15/82 three surveillances and t'wo audits were performed by. CECO l Quali'ty Assurance'to assess the nature and scope of the problem.
l In February 1982, at the direction of the Commonwealth i Edison Quality Assurance Manager, a Special Audit was performed to investigate the conditions verbally reported to him by phone by Ron Perry, 'a Zack employee, as well as audit other aspects of the Zack Program. 2 In summary, Commonwealth Edison Company has maintained continuous and comprehensive involvement with the Zack work act'ivities and the implementation of its Quality Assurance Program to l ensure the work was being done correctly for the LaSalle Site. Special actions were taken to correct work deficiencie s, disposition - acceptably identified documentation deficienicies and ensure-the ~ heating, ventilating, and air condicioning (HVAC) system was pro ided-and installed as required. Furthermore, upon identification of problems at the Zack Coqporate Headquarters in late 1981, additional f
~,e,-- -.,.n n e -, v , na +v- --m---- , ,
c monitoring of Zack was performed to search for any other possible problems and to ensure corrective actions were complete'd. Finally, the use of Conam Quality Control Inspectors to augment the on-site Edison Quality Assurance inspection, surveillance and audit
. activities to independently inspect the HVAC installation including -
the associated equipment and components provided by others further assures that the HVAC system is installed as required by the design. f)' Seas, Inc. - Cannot meet standards An audit performed by Zack at the Seas Inc. plant on February 10 1982 stated that Seas "cannot verify any product furnished.", Ia order to fully understand the meaning of the Zack finding, the GAP documentat' ion was reviewed and was found to contain the following information. On February 6, 1981, Zack wrote identical letters to Seas Inc. , Key Crest Inc. , Thiele and Delta Screw Co. stating that the her nuts be supplied and certified to ASTM-A307 and as a result, these manufacturers supplied the her nuts with certification to ASTM-A307. Zack then discovered that the.her nuts should have been certified to ASTM A-563 and requested the manufacturers to supply the new certifications. One manufacturer replied on 2-13-81 and stated that the hex nuts are certified for use with grade ASTM A-307 steel bolts but the nuts are made to ASTM A-563. In a practical sense the original certification was correct but " technically" conformance to ASTM A-563 should also have been stated. A review of the LaSalle County Station purchase ~ order discrepancy log showed that all of the document problems with Seas were of this nature i.e. " incorrect standard referenced" or'"no standard referenced". In all cases, Zack prepared a non-conformance report. The product document verificaton problem was minor in significance. Conclusion Based on the above, CECO Q.A. concludes that the Zack documentation problems have been adequately investigated and addressed and the information included in the document package submitted by GAP does not change this position. It is our position that Edison is aware of the details of the allegations and has investigated them sufficiently to be assured that the materials pro'.vided by Zack for the LaSalle County Station are of proper quality and the LaSalle Unit #1 facilities are safe to operate. , 0386Q 3
., ~, - _ _ _ , - _ . _ , _ - . . _ _ . - - _ _ . - . . _ _ ,
Attachment A I: d Commonwealth Edison Company Q. A. Audits pnd Surveillances of the Zack Company / .
, Surve111ances
- Year Audits Performed Performed i 1976 1 1 1977 4 17 1978 5 35 1979 8 35 1980 9 82 1981 ~6 83 1982 (6 months) 4 57 l
5
,r'
s . . . Attachment B ,
. "Stop Work" Actions Imposed on Zack Company LaSalle-County Station Date Initiated Date Removed Program Deficiency 7/22/77 9/27/77 (all activitie s Welder Qualification, Q.C.
except Welding) training
. 10/11/77 (Welding) Program d'esign control, Q.C.
inspection & inspection documentation, and misc. program deficiencies. 6/25/79 7/25/79 (Partial) _. Unacceptable Q.C. inspection 8/06/79 at LaSalle 4/02/80 6/21/80 Unqualified Q.C. inspectors at
~
Fab Shop in Chicago. On-site hold point established for receipt inspection of HVAC , assemblies. 8/06/80 10/20/80 Design Control, ~Q.C. Inspections, and
" Safety-Related Welding -
l l : l
~-
Attachment C - ' ' CONAM INSPECTION AGENCY COVERAGE OF ZACK COMPANY INSTALLATION ACTIVITIES AT THE LASALLE SITE ACTIVITY DURATION General Inspection of Zack Field 2/24/78 - 6/24/79 Activities (17 reports on file) 100% Re-inspection of future 6/25/79 - 6/07/81 and past Zack " Safety-Related welding on-site. (Hangers) 50% re-inspection of Zack 6/08/81 - 6/21/81 on-site welding. _ 25% re-inspection of Zack 6/22/81 - 7/05/81 on-site welding 10% re-inspection of Zack 7/06/81 - Present on-site welding
~
100% . inspection of Zack. 4/02/80 - 5/10/82
~
ductwork~ entering the building . and being erected at LaSalle l 4 L , --
. .. a, .....:.ua. . .:. , ;. w y c:3 ~. ,
~ ~
- a a..:. w w m m
- J w. w .: ~ .-
~f ,
(, Nrdh5 i - p, b AJP-8 y COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY CHRONOLOGY ON RESOLUTION 4
,oF ZACK COMPAM 50.55(e) - DOCUMENTATION DEFICIENCIES fntroduction Throughout the July 26, 1982 Government Accountability Project (GAP) letter to Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)
Chairman Nunzio J. Palladino and the attached affidavits and exhibits, statements are made that Commonwealth Edison C time demands order to avoid to resolvedelays licensing material atdocumentation LaSalle County deficiencies Station. This. in chronology details CECO Project Construction Department's actions during the September 25, 1981 to April 15, 1982 time period that as they relate to the issue at hand. The record shows the Zack progress was monitored, ;ommunication with Zack Company was frequent, : and Zack Comoany waslloweds' qualitytocontrol procedures slip their wereof resolution followed, documentation deficiencies as the fuel load was delayed. Chronolony A September 25, 1981, Zack~ Company letter informed CECO of a possible reportable event under 10 CFR 50.55(e) on documentation inconsistencies. Zack had.not yet completed its investigation as to the extent and validity of the documentation inconsistencies. 1981; They anticipated being complete by October 31,
- CECO was not pleased with the discrepancy information but the completion date given did not appear to adversely affect the l
December 15, 1981 scheduled fuel load date. Zack was requested to inform Ceco on their progress. NRC Region III'was notified L of a potential 50.55(e) construction deficiency.on September 30, 1981. Reports froni Zack in October,'1981 indicated the progress on the documentation review as going well. On October 9, 1981 and October 23, 1981, Zack issued reports with findings of their review. These reports indicated categories of deficient items, quantities and corrective actions planned and taken to that time. An interim report on the 50.55(e) was submitted to NRC Region III based on the above Zack report on October 30, 1981. On November'2, 1981, CECO wrote to Zack Com l specific Zack nonconformance re which would require i
- Owner /A-E dispositioning (i.e., ports (NCRs)pany engineering basis) be submitted requesting that to CECO.
that were These not in Zack NCRswith accordance were S&L to specification detail material certifications and/or ASTM standards. Zack NCRs which did not require Owner /A-E disposi-tioning were not required to be submitted to CECO. The Zack NCRs were to be submitted no later than November 13, 1981. Zack Company was in agreement with our requests. On November 13, 1981, fifteen (15) Zack Company NCRs were submitted. These Zack NCRs were then categorized and put on l three (3) CECO NCRs (f556, #557 and #558). These were sent to CECO Project Engineering /Sargent & Lundy Engineers for disposition.
, L , , ,,,, ,, i ,
y _ _, ,,, ,
~
Based on these 3 NCRs, a final report was issued to the NRC Region III in early December 1981. The disposition' of all 3 CECO NCRs was completed on December 31, 1981. Howsver, another CECO NCR (#566) was opened on December 31, 1981 to address a remaining open item on one of the original 15 Zack Company NCRs. The disposition of this NCR was completed on February 18, 1982. In late January, 1982, based on CECO Quality Assurance Department audits and conversations with Zack, many additional . Zack NCRs were reported still open, plus a few purchase orders needed to be reviewed. At this point, the scheduled fuel load ; date was March 15, 1982. CECO requested that Zack expedite its review ano corrective action program. .Mr. Albert T. Howard, o Zack Quality Assurance Documentation Supervisor, issued a report on February 12, 1982 to CECO. Mr. Howard reported as of January 15, 1982, that a significant increase in the number of corrected purchase orders packages had been accomplished and a number of the remaining purchase orders indicated as still discrepant had only one or two items to be corrected. A copy of this~ report and attachments is included. (Note: This report is not ' referenced in the GAP letter and attachments.) Zack was informed that all NCRs still open on March 1 1982, should be submitted to CECO for engineering disposition. Zack was contacted frequently prior to March 1 to monitor progress and emphasize the importance of March 1 date. On March 1, 1982, Zack-submitted 69 open NCRs. In reviewing'these NCRs with Project Engineering /Sargent & Lundy Engineers was felt that many of the NCRs were of.such a nature that'Zack should be able to close them without Ceco imput. A review by Project Engineering /Sargent & ,Lundy Sngineers of the
' specifications ~, purchase orders and Zack Q.A. Program revealed that Zack was being overly conservative in classifying documen-tation deficiencies as nonconforming. Zack was advised of this finding on March 9, 1982, and all 69 nonconformances reports were returned. Over the next three weeks Zack continued its corrective action program in an effort to resolve the remaining 69 nonconformances. During this period, the CECO fuel load date continued to slip a week or two at a time.
4 On April 1, 1982, Zack returned 21 open NCRs. All 21 Zack
;NCRs were placed on a CECO NCR (#594) and sent to Project
- Engineering /Sargent & Lundy Engineers for disposition. On April L
7, 1982, CECO requested additional information on five (5) Zack NCRs. The information was available at Zack and would be sent immediately. ' On April 9, 1982, Zack had completed its review and supplied the necessary information. CECO then closed NCR #594. It was CECO's understanding that all Zack NCRs relating to document closed. deficiencies had been resolved and the matter was
, . . - - , - - - , . - -,,_,.--.,.-,,,n . + - - , . -
~ . - ~ ~ . u s. , e - m u . m .< m :. m . ..
3 .. Smnary - The Zack Company was continually progress towards resolving the 50.55(e) monitored. The goal of this monitoring was to provide direction and engineering support to the Zack disposi-tioning effort as well as address corrective action. At no time 1 l were on Zack unrealistic Company.target completion dates and undue. pressure put As the fuel load date slipped, Zack was . i allowed additional time to resolve the 50.55(e). Correspondence : i from Zack indicates they met
- CECO requests and correctly dispositioned the discovered material documentation I discrepancies. !
4638N k
'\
4600W.12TH PLACE
- CHICAGO,' .OEROllLI 60650
- 312/242 3434
. 4401 WESTERN
- FLINT MICHIGAN 4".506
- 313/73}2040
. -Q , . .
s s ~ the ZACK co. , CUSTOM METAL. FAB.RICATION February 12, 1982 , HVAC Contract 63-259,0
'Comunonwealth Edison Co.
LaSalle County Nuclear Station Rural itoute #1, Box 240 Marseilles, IL 61341 Attn Mr. Richard Cosaro Projcet t'.anager ,
. Ra'f The Zack Company letter dated October 23, 1981
Subject:
Potential 10CFR50.55(e) Material Deficiency Report . Gentlemen;
~
Attached is an updated (3anuary 15, 1982) report on the status of the material certifications identified in the above referenced letter. As indicated by the , report, a significant increase in the number of corrected purchase order packages has been accomplished and a n.unber of the remaining purchase orders indicated as still dise,repant have only one or two items to be corrected. Therefore, the number of actual material certifications acceptable is in excess of the percent - indicated in the report. - It is The Zack Compa,ny's opin' ion at this time that all problems still existing could be corrected with further vendor / subcontractor persuance and those items not resolved through this,same endeavor might be resolve'd with engineering disposition. , With thfs interim report The Zack Company'would liks to assure you of its con-tinued efforts in the above direction. S'nould you have any questions or, problems, please contact me. Most 5incerely, , s.O ert T. Howard Quality Assurance Documentation Supervisor . ATH/dm ,
. FOUNDED TO SOLVE THE UNIQUE METAL FABRICATION NEEDS OF INDUSTRY* *
- DEDICATED TO CLEANING AND CUSTOMlZING ' THE AIR OF THE WORLD .
-e-. . .
a . ( .
,P;13 2 .
e *
- te Mrs. C. Dazutel
- Masrs. J.C. Dezutel .
L.J. Bur,kg, Site Project Mgr. . T. Quaka, QA CECO ,
* ' B. Wood, QA CECO * *
- J.
Dearbeck,
CECO
- rai
- C.L. Eichstaedt, Jr. . :
D.E. Calkins . . D. Malt.ahn . M.L. skates C. Baumgardner Q.A. Chicago , g.A. Tan 11s ad le
-~ . id.
. .g
- e
~~
. le '
. .i.-
I l
- tt 4.
4 e
. O 6
\ .
- e g
=
e s.e+ m se .y* T * *
- M Wo te=*e .M m*- . * * . 4 a .
**e- P e 9 -
f
.4200 W.12TH CHICAGO ., *ERO)I 60650
- D2/242 3434
. [
4401 WESTERN
- FLINTMICHIGArid8506
- 313/736 2043 . .
, s. ' - - - -
the' ER@X. co. , CUSTOM METAL FABRICATION l l 9 January 15,198'2 ADDENDUM REPORT TO LaSALLE POWER STATION SHOWING CORRECTED P.O./CMTR PKGS. FROM FIRST TO SECOND REPORT l . - Prepared for: Bruce Wood .Q.A. Engineer, Commo'nwealth Edison l .
- l. Prepared by: Terry Howard, Q.A. Engineer- Document Control Ronald A. Perry, Q.A. Enginee'r
~
. FOUNDED TO SOLVE THE UNIQUE METAL FABRICATON NEEDS OF INDUSTRY * -
- DEDICATED TO CLEANING AND CUSTOMlZlNG THE AIR OF THE WO8LD *
. . . 1
( 0RRECTIVE
. ACTION
! Ist, REPORT - DISCREPANC. LISTING
' ~ ..
h'*P.O.# None
! 1127 None -
None None . 1046 f
; None ;' -
952 None C of C not on file ' CofC-locatedo'ndincluded 582 ' None 4016 None
' None 4077 ' None None 41b4 None - c None .
4165 None , C of C only . C of C to correct Stondord - advise
- 13207 consulting S&L engineering revision tentatively ppin.
Vendor supplied A.S.T.M. 913 No A.S.T.M. - None
-. None .
565 . None 4036 None . A.S.T.M. A307 occeptoble for nuts
'.S.T.M. A307'for. nuts
~ ,
4424 A
' Non'e -
470 None. , No.C&rtsi Reference to Zack NCR L-14712/28/81 474-No A.S.T.M. Vendor re's'olution . 605 - .
~ Vendor' resolution 636 No A.S.T.M. .
No A.S.T.M. Vendar resolution ! 637 - No A.S.T.M. kendorresolution
'645 658 'o N A.S.T.M. Vendor resolution .
None . 666! None' . No golv.'rgference G90designationonibvoice . 790* ' None . . 793 , None - 813 .No A.S.T.M. ' None 4014 None None 4044 None
~
.' None 4092 Non.e ,
(.ARECTIVEACTION 1,sf REPORT - DISCREPANC, LISTING -
, . . ~
P.O.# . None 4044 None ' None ,
- 4092 None Reviewed P.O. and found accep' table 4108 reflects no ' -
~
P.O.irement requ . None 4143 , None , None 4337 None - Material on hold (partial) 4455 None Vendor resolution 9441 No A.S.T.M.' None 9447 None . Mtl. certs - material on hold wi-12346 No Material certs NCR L-157 Zack Co. engineers to review ~
~
563 No CMTR/C of C _ See NCR L-159 Certs not availat 583 No Certs N N N N N 584
' No certs
' S&L spec. revision to accept A3f 773 A36.8cterial not '
/ acceptable at LaSalle l S&L spec. revision to accept A3 775 A36 not for LaSalle Spec. change Oct. 7,1981 MTL.A240 not acceptabl e ~ 676 at LaSalle - Addendum to Sal spec. render's.t f 801 Mtl not acceptable to .- acceptable -[ note NCR L-164) l
- S & L. spec. '
[as above] , 807 , [some as above] [as abovel 826 [same as above) \ [some as abovel, [as above] & vendor resolut1or 1094 , Vendor resolution . 1102 [some'as'above'l , [same) , 4470' [some as above] l
~ Engineering resolution being 587 CMTRtoAISp1035 e
I
All 'of the' following were listed on the first report submitted by the .
. Zack Company on October 23, 19.82. However, u)on cursory examination one will find that these some listed P.O. num>ers were without itsmized descrepancies. I would like to submit those with the generalized ex .
. planation of" Vendor correction" to be added to the foregoing as accept-able P.O./CMTR Pkgs. - -
~m.
~
P . O . #' - ! 4021 , 552 '
.- Sg .
52ti . 526 535 13207 739 - -
.641 -
643 ' 743 . 914 .
~
938 ' 940 . 947 - 1029 . 1274 ' S
. e t
l
- t. .
G G 8
.O O
e e O . 4 g
. 4600 W.12TH PLACE'o CHICAGO (
4401 *WESTERN
- ERO)ILL 60650 e D2/242+3434 e FLINT MICHIGAN'42506
- 313/736 2043 -
( . the m M@D0 co..' , CUSTOM METAL kABRICATION 7' ~ ,. . . February 10," 1982 EQAD-234
~
- hTTENTION: Tom Quaka '
Q.A. Superintendent / . LaSalle County Station - REFERENCE' QAL i5361 dated 1/29/82
SUBJECT:
Corrective action on open Pos
. i. -
Attached is an updated status report on purchase orders listed as open on QAL #5361 dated 1/29/82. Those identified as still discrepant have corrective action in progress as noted. Yours Truly, The Zack Cc=pany - * , o bN . Ronald A. Perry -
~ '
Q.A. Engineer . RAP /dm'
- cc: Q.A. files ,
l . l .
~
i . j
- FOUNDED TO SOLVE THE UNIOUE METAL FABRICATION NEEDS OF INDUSTRY * .
- DEDICATED TO CLEAN'I NG AND CUSTOMIZING THE AIR OF THE WORLD '* - .
. o * = -
l , , _ l ATTACHMENT I . . DISCREPANCY LISTING CORRECTIVE ACTION . C508 Wrong standard referenced on C of C . Reference EQAD-203 letter to vendor dated 2/1/82. No response received as of 2/10/82 C572 No Cert.s . Engineering disposition required - C586 No certs , Specification sheet received (acceptable) C914 Alteration On re-reveiw - no alteration of Zack PO#
~
(acceptable) C947'. Alteration
. On re-review - Heatt identical on cert and cover letter (acceptable)
C4$05 Wrong standard referenced on C of C -Reference ZQAD-181 letter to vendor dated 1/28/82. No response received as of 2/10/82 Y a . t I
- 9 "g e
O . N . l . .
,e5
*O e
O . e- . g
- e.,, ., g
~
EOO W.12TH PLACE p CHICAGO te"".ERO)ILt.60650-* 312/242 3434
, 4401 WESTERN e FLINT MICHIGAN J506
- 313/716 2040
( N .
' ~
thel M @ iX ')r c o.
~
CUSTOM METAL FABRICATION February 10,"1982
, 2QAD-235 A2TENTI H: Tom Quaka Q.A. Superintendent
- LaSalle County Station ,
REFERESCE: QAL #5376 dated 2/3/82 * .
%ttached.is an updated status report of purchase orders that were identified on QAL #5376 nd rsquiring resolution. The Zack Chicago Document Control Center has reviewed these P.O.c with the r.tti.ched (attachment II) comment (s) .
? _ Yours Truly, Th3 Zack Company ggf - t Tcr . Howard, Documentation Supervisor . Ronald A. Perry, Q.A. Engineer TH/AAP/dm ces Q.A. files - a. 4 mO . - . S ( . l
.. ~
l FOUNDED TO SOLVE THE UNIOUE METAL FABRICATION NEEDS OF INDUSTRY
- l
- DEDICATE.D TO CLEANING AND CUSTOM! ZING THE AIR OF THE WOR,LD t -
1 - ,
4 ATIACHMfNT II ". DISCREPANCY LISTING , CORRECTIVE
- AdTION C9504 No Certs Vendor supplied C of C C9509 No Certs Engineering dispositioh required 0
l -. \ - l l . e e O l . 1 e
- f .
P
- S
- e .
- O *
. b N - , .
a g - - -
,/
e .
. O O
, 1
. i l
IEFINITIOtS CF SLMWW LISTItC
- 1. Packages Ardewed 'Inis iten lists the total nurtzr of packages that were reviewed for this repcet only. It[ includes the
,nunbar of purchase orders that the site have. It does not h:mrver, include those purchase orders generated after. Ncwurnbar 10, 1981.
- 2. Packages correct and :---? *1= 'Diis includes the tc+al number of P.O./ .
Otms that the Doceant 'mara deara correct /wyWe
- through January 15, 1982.
- 3. Discrepant Packages - Includes the total nunber of P.O./CMrRs not acceptable
~
for the reascns listed in nu2ers four (4) through nine (9).
- 4. No 1'mterial Certs 'Ihis Mtx5es those packages that have no certification 3
data, i.e., certified test matarial/ certificate of cen-formance (cappliance).
- 5. No ;frfs/c'.am test data 'Ihis nunber indicates the total of packages that are missing part or all of OfIR data.
- 6. tyg standard referenced 'Ihis ' includes the nacer of packages sharei the standard referenced in the certification is contra _y to -
the contract specificaticrVprocurement docmed.
- 7. No standard referenced 'Ihis includes the nuser of ykes in 1,:hich there
, was no standard referenced in the procurement and docu-rnent/ material certificatien.
- 8. Esterial does not meet Spec. 'Ihis in.:lufas those P.O. packages that material does not meet the standard sF41' icd.
1
- 9. ; Clerical errors 'Ihis group incitz5es, a variety of discrepancies (minor) that are clerical in nature; i.e., no AS'Dt, no ASWyr., No ASWyr. designa~ tion, ty;ographical errers, etc.
l 8 I 9
~ . - . - , - - - - . _ ,_,---s- _m, - .g _ -.
. c . y
~
, . s. .
. . RESLU5/SLMW T REVIDT (MFm IM:RM)
-I. Increase in !b. of correct ykgs. ,
3rd to 4th (Report) Increase A. Hidland 145 374 229 B. IaSalle 109 237 128 C. Clintcn 159 268 109 II. Lx:rease of percent (t) of emplete pkgs. A. Hidland 26 68.0 B.Tah11* 37 58.52 C. Clinten 42 67.34 III. No. of discrepancies Yequiring engineering dispositicm. A. Midlard 23 B. Tah11e 14
, C: Clinten 14 IV. No,of, discrepincia.s requiring possible engineering disposition. .
I A. Midlan.d
- 42 l-B. Tan 11e 27 .
' C. Clinton . 23
, V. No. of dis =repancies r='4N@ path sessible and definite engineering disposi* h .
,, Percent (%)
A. Midland 65 11.71 , B. Tah11e - 41 10.21 37 10.26 s C. Clint.en . S i I
- ef.
l , c. le
. IA SALT.E STATICN CNLY ,
- 1. Pedtages reviewed. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 05 .
- 2. Pekata= correct ard acceptable. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 237 4
- 3. ni ae = pant packages. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 168 .
- 4. No noterial certs. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 S. No phys / chem test data. . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 .
- 6. Wrong standard referenced.................... 19
. 7. No standard referenced....................... 10 S. Material does rot mee*fspec. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,3 ,
- 9. Clerical errors. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67
- 10. IAstad by site - not located. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 t
m l I
- 1 1
1
)
*\
\
J
~
l
/ .,
l
. t t
~
s s IA SALIE DISCREPAhT - (OPEN) . . E 451 668 4205 9417 '17103 452 683 42i6 . 9419 454 696 4268 9420 455 . 704 4270 9421~ Total: 103
~
,465 714 4285 9422 .
472 722 4286 9427 508 736 4289 9429 519 764 4294 9442 520 798 4312 9444 522 804 4340 9450 542 852 __ 5759 9455 1 549 893 5776 9501 566 SD9 - 6813 9505 - 567 954 9242 9506' 572. 9762 956 9244 597 1329 9251 9636 599" . G3111 - 9401 10784
. 602 4004 9402 11237 603 4023 9403 11271' ,
616 4048
- 9411 11544 617 4052 9412 , '12206
~627 4080 9413 122,85 630 4081 9414 13246 - -
639 4105 9415 13912 3 651 4137 9416 16429 ,
- 652 4157
. p e
6 .
4
' AIL STITS - DISCREPA P (WEN) .
_Cf
- 456 762 . 1255 7M Qu4 ..
[ 464 797 4055 468 802 9247 586 803 11503 601 806 12281 604 820 12303 606 821 '12304 609 822 12434 611 B23 13238 632 827 13255 633 830 13268 642 839 13293 644 ~151 , 662 855 'Ibtal: 65 663 888 - 665 912 ,
. 684 917
~
. 701 955 .
711 987
. 7N' 1048 .'
724 . 1070
. . 738 1076 -
~ ^'
'742 1589 .
746 1133 . 752 1195 -
~
1238 k e , m e l t e e
. + r PAGE 1 OP *
...- t/. SALIE 15 i - . ... ::a .
- ITEN DESCRIPTION-REQ'D. DOC. DISCREPANCY '. COMMENTS / PROPOSED RESOLUTION Colls 8215 - 216 - 217 - -
.. ,1 218 - 219 Of!R ib ASDVyear designation Zack to obtain revised OtrRs -
i s Q>ils 8220.- 221 - 222 - '\-
. 223 - $24 OUR N2 A9DVyear designation Zack to obtain zievised OfrRs } *
,dj,
. . Q)ils Of!R No certs . ,
'ack Z to obtain OCRs . .
l Osils 8229 - 230 - , , .. A 231 - 232 OtrR Mi AS'IM year - Zack to obtain revised OttRs Goils #233 - 234 - '
. . . 235 - 236 OUR Nb AS'hi year Zack'to obtain rehised CMERs
.: Missing g*g. .
Zack will attengt to locate , l Structural nuts C of C interial does not inact 'Dvy,inee' ring dispositioh required bolts - spx:. . . . l 1 i l . . I e e w s
4.y. . gg . . PAGE, OP 15 6 1:o . ITEM DESCRIPTION REQ'D. DOC. DISCREPANCY COMMENTS / PROPOSED RESOLUTIdN .
,1> Angles DCR No galvanizing cert Zack to obtain galvanizirq cert * *
~
- i
..i Angle OGR hb galvanizing cert Zack to obtain galvanizing cert Ilex nuts *
.ic washers C of C Wrong standard referenced - P'ossible engineering disposition required
- screws 3 (No Zack P.O.)
.&> - "J" bolts and washers C of C 16 certs Zack to obtain certs -
66 Bolts C of C - Wrong ptandard referenced Possible engineering disposition required Washers ~ *
*/ Elcen welded be$a C of C Material does not meet PossibleengineerihuJ diagnaition required attactrnents spec.
- Pipe couplings OfrR 10 certs Zack to obtain OERs .
t
, ' * *
- Se
- s e
D 5 9 0 S
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ - _ ___-_- _ _ -_ - ___-___-_ ________-___ __ _ - - __~ _ - . .
. , i
*Iet 5 mm ( PAGE O!' 15 j _
3 I*. .. tio . ' ITEM DESCRIPTION REQ'Q. DOC. DISCREPANCY . COMMENTS / PROPOSED RESOLUTION *
.w? Iles; bead screw C of C 2 AS1M year Eack will Ettempt to locata P.O. ~
(No.Zack P.O.)
. 's .
.o Miising pkg. zack will attempt to locate i ,' . ;
(Possible enginaarimy disposition required) , j
/ Coils $252 - 253 - 254 -
- ish . 255 - 256 OGR _. No AS'D4/ year designation _. Zack to obtain revised OER*
. ~ . ..
Coils 8248 r 249 - ,
.' u3 250 - 251 OHR % AS1N/ year designation ,
zack to obtain revised O GR t .
.t Structural har stock OCR m ASit4/ year designation zack 'to obtain revised OCR
, \ l i - , \ .
~
.17 . S bar stock OCR 2 AS1H year Sack to obtain revised OUR
- i -
Angle OfrR Ib ASTM / year &signation 24ck to obtain havised O GR. , t
, <v*4e e .
g . 4 e f
'l 1 .
I 4
. o h,1: . IA SALIE * .s *
. PAGE 4 OF 15
. t n . !!a . ITEM DESCRIPTION REQ'D. DOC. DISCREPANCY .
- COMMENTS / PROPOSED RES')LUTIO'N ,
.l . .! Sheets," OCR Fo ASTM year Zack to obtain revised OCR , ,
. s
- a. .u . Angles OGR . No ASTM Zack to obtain revised OGR ,
.h IAngles OCR Ib AS1Wycar daignation Zack to obtain revised OCR *
..I SS Sheet OGR .tb AS1H yr.
- Zack to obtain correct OGR' .
i.- Angles, Bars OCR Tb yyr, designation Zack to obtain correct OGR
. . a. Angles, channel C of C Different count cm gal- Zack will attenyt to obtain corrected cart (galvanizing) v.mizing certs .
, Flats OfrR ib Itysicals, t 102,*103, 104 , Ehginocring dispositicn required' ,
.I .
A T
. t o .
. i 1:
. s . .:. . IA sg2m ,, PAGE 5 OP 15 t* . (s . I:o . ITEM DESCRIPTION REQ'D. DOC. DISCRi:PANCY COMMEE*S/ PROPOSED RESOLUTION .
~ ^* '
~ Ooils 1405 - 506 - 507 . . s . ,.. 408 - 409 , OGR m AS'IM/yr. designation Zack Q). will obtain corrected OGR
?
. IJ4 Angle rings OGR 2 certs - 3x3xl/4 * . Pcssible engineering disposition regdred
,: 3 Angle rings OGR m certs ,
- Zack will attospt to arrydre,01fR ,
.Possible cngineering disposition required
" ~
m certs - 722 - 722 .
/.* J Angle rings OCR '
722 722-4 Possible engineering. disposition required A4 Bars'ard ang1cs OGR . standard referen d - Emgitseering disposition rmpired '
/ ... Sheets *
- OGR 2 certs Engineering Alegmition regnized -
Wrong standard reforcnced .
. ,Sg ure w iled tubing OCR Wrong standard" referenced Engineering disposition regdred .
. s
. l .
. . t
* . ?
. . l
/
l '/
/
+
i
* ~
JO . . IA 3Aug . PAGE 6 OF 15
- r . o . !!u. ITEM DESCRIPTIOlt REQ'D. DOC.. , DISCREPANCY COMMElfTS/ PROPOSED RESOLUTION ,
4 . .
, ~ "
a.'s.: SS Mt6ets OtrR Wrorq type references Digineering. Alernaitien regaired . . T .309-2B s I
. s1 Jlngle rings OtrR 2 certis Zack to attmyt Waanitica of OEIR
- r. Angle rings OtrR m As1Wyr. .
- zack to attempt =Pii=ition;of correeded OtrR i
i wl
- Angle rings OttR' ' m AS1H
- Iack to <**mia corrected OEIR j . .
5 t 4
.t
*,4. Angle rings OttR . 2 AS1 W yr.
Eack to obtain corrected OEIR e
~
-u I .. s Angle rings OtrR m. of itans hivanizud does Ibssible j inn disposit.len respi(red .
not etch no. of mterial itans .. t [ *:1 Angle rings Of!R m ASW/yr. - Eack to obtain corrected OttR
- l l i .
- i .
i . l -
. . e i .
1 .
* /
1 I e I i . . .
. - _ . ._ , _ _ _ _ . . . - - ~ _ - _ __.
_ _ __ -.m_. - _ _ _ _ . - _ _ _ __ _ . _ _ _ _
, o
~
~
4 s. .I. . 3A SMIE .. . PAGE 7 OP 15
. u
..u. No. ITEM DESCRIPTION REQ'D. DOC. DISCREPANCY C0000ENTS/ PROPOSED RESOLUTICII "*
l .:.u 3 Hex cap screws and C of C Wrong standard referenced I!hgineering dispositiera repaired - mahars' , for washers a *s Inck mshers C of C Wrong standard referenced Possible engineering dispn=ltion regaired - ,i
.e. 6.s . Tak screws C of C Ib standard referenced ."Zack to obtain revised C of C .
i f . (Possible engineering dispnmition regaired) o ..! Pop itivets C of C lb standard referenced '* Zack to obtain revised C of C ~
~
- (Poesihte ---i- ing dispmition repaired)
. ' . .o Hex head cap screws C of C . Wrong standard referenced Possible engineering dispnmition regaired ,
j . mu t i . .I TcIk screws - C of C Ho standard referenced Zack to obtain' revised C of C -
.'- (tossihic engineering dispositica regaired) .
- .' Studs -
. - Nuts C of C Wrong standard refe'enced r Possible magineering diarnaition ru'esired i i Washers . I
., , .w....
. : I e
1 i I S l i
t a .
~
.JUi. a IA SAGE *
~
- PAGE 8 OP 15 I a 1.o. Ib. ' ITEM DESCRIPTIDN REQ'D. DOC. DISCREPANCY -
COMMENTS / PROPOSED RESOLUTION . 4 .__
' Hex Head bolts 41's? Itex head rmts C of C Wrong standard referenced Possible engineering disposition' req-ired . !
l Hex Imid wt*ers . i .
- :re, Huck ' pins C of C Cert not signed
- Zadc to obtain revised C of C . -
Huck, collars , f Hex head cap screws . i i. to ' Hex head nuts C of C Wrong standard referencmd , Ibmsible engineering dispnmition @
- Hex head teeshers j
4tus Carbon are sticks OtrR % certs 2ack to obtain OtrR , I r.: /o par 4ertraft dampers Material certs not reviewod Zack to reviewcarts On - ( ,
~
Hex head cap screws 4 s*, Hex head cap nuts C of C Wrong standard referenced W!-ing diurnaitbn nrydred (A164) . . .
..s Air Manitors C of C certsnotr'uvidwed tack to review certs
- e
.i
. . ac . gp -
e 4 4 1 4 9
.- -- .. ~ . - - .- . . - . .-- . _ . . . . ..._. . ..
*. la SALIE .,
PAGE g CF 35 r . r. rks. ITEM DESCRIPTION REQ'D. DOC. DISCREPANCY . COMMENTS / PROPOSED RESOLUTION . i
* /
2 Hex head cap screws .. . .
'b.
- Hex nuts C of C Wrong standard referenced Engineering disposition required
'dI Pup rivets C of C Wrong standard referenmd PnamiMa engineering Afegmition Maimt 4ae Missing pkg. ,
, Zack ,will attempt to 1ccata, . ,
5 1 i , .I ps PopIrivets
- C of C- .
, Possible engineering diagnadtien zogaired. -
O)ils 07 9 - . No certs for 22 & 24
. r. .e 10 - 13 OCR gagh mtl. Ee d to obtain carts l ,
l / /.. 0511 123 - OffR 14) certs for 22 & 24 . Eack to'chtslin carts . 1
. 9.ge =ti. .
1
.n Q211 36 OER No AS1?Vyear disposition Eack to obtain revised OER i.
t - i }
- r
, . ee a.
g .
- t 6
8 i
?
i. o P I
t I
, l t e, 9' i n .
r . O e - E , G
- _
A P N O , R I T t r E U e O L c R R R R . d O g C C n C e S n .O O o O t c-E i e R t d d d d . r t e e e e r D n s s s s o E e v i R i i 'i v c v v v - S l a e C .er e e r n s. , O g r O , r i P a ,. O n .n n a i n i n t . R i i i a i a = b P t a .t a t *
=
t .
- o ,
/ b S bo b o
b o 4 c o d . l l T o o o i
' N o o t
o t t t t w E t k M k k k k k c M k c c . c c a c e a = a a a
- O a 2 Z Z Z E '
~ C 2, ?
n n n . n n o c o o i o i i i i t t t t t a a a a t n a r n n g n g g g g r i i i e .is i s s s . s e s c e e e e d d d d Y g d C n r r r r r a N i a a a a e A i z e e c e y y y y P n y V V V E a v V s V D R l D t r D DI D S S C ag S o S S A A S A c A, A . I o ) 2 D m N m m m N N. I C . O - D . R R , R R . D R R .R G G G c n G - U
'Q O O O O O O O E
R ' 7 7 4 4 N . 2 1 O -
- - - 1 I -
T 6 68 68 80 60 P 4 00 22 12 . 45 11 I 2 11 11 11 R - - - - - - C - S 5 57 57 79 59 E .
, .4 00 22 , 11 44 11 D 2 A,
11 8 11 11 3 9 9 M s s s s s E e s e l s l l l T l g l i
/l/g i i i i o > o a I n b n C E
1 A ( A O- . Q d. d 8 E . ~ I
+
. 1 -
- f. ,
- t. .
-, a.
-x 9 :
N 'i, '. .
.i . .
IA SAI.IE , . PAGE gg OF 15 1 .... If ITEM DESCRIPTION REQ'D. DOC. DISCREPANCY COMMENTS / PROPOSED RESOLWION
- Ill: (bils 1148 - 151 - 152 CMIR le ASDt/yr, designation . Zack will obtain corrected OGR . ,
- Ooils f156 - 157 - *
.Is 158 - 159 OGR Ib ASDg/yr. designation Zack will obtain corrected'OGR Cbils I174 - 175 - 176 -
- se & 177 - 178 OGR Ib ASDt/yr, designation , Zack will obtain corrected QGR .
3 Cbils #129 - 120 -
- eII, ' 164 - 163 OCR 2 ASD4/yr. ,
Zack will obtain corrected OGR (bils 1151 - 132 - - *
. I t f. 155 - 182 OGR . Ib AS'IM yr. Zack will obtala porrected OGR i
Cbils 1101 - 102 - - - -
.ie t *103 104 OCR ,
2 ASD4/yr designation Zack will obtain corrected OGR * (bils f166 - 170 -
. 171 - 172 OGR N3 ASDI year
- Zack to obtain revised OCR
.e *
, ve t. ,
s
/
/
e e 4
- * , 9
.A. :: IA SAIIE . PAGE 12 OF 15
~
l.O. 11.2 . ITEM DESCRIPTION REQ'D. DOC. DISCREPANCY i COMMENTS / PROPOSED RESOLUTION ,
~.
02114 0167 - 168 -
.s I_'o I . . 169 - 173 ,
OER No ASIM year Zack to obt*In revised OER -
*s i.: l m ils f183 - 184 - 185 OER ibASIMyear Zack to obtain revised OUR
, : 2.* Fans C of C . It) C of C .
Zack to obtain C of.C l .
. art Angles
- OER ~
- 14) AS1 W year designation Eack to obtain revised O ERs
- O m nels _
*....*s Sheets OER -
NojAS1W year designation Eack to obtain Jovised OERs W I? Angles OER No ASTM year Zack to obtain revised Osts . - mils #210 - 211 - 212 - - M:i. 213 - 214 OER No AS1Wyoar des'ignation tack to obtain revised OUR , 4
.s ?
e
,. 0
/
e #
/
e
... la SALE PAGE. 13 OF 15 ;
t . .s. : a. ITEM DESCRIPTION REQ'D. DOC. DISCREPANCY . COMMENTS /PitOPOSED RESOLUTION
...e Angles- OUR . (A575 mtl.) - IE0 AS2Wyear ' '
Zack to obtalii revised OER ' designation i a Angles OER 2 AS2Wyear Zack to obtain revised OBR , , Grilles
- Registers Miterial.- Of1R M certs Zack to obtain carts
.. i i
- a Diffuners (Seimmic analysis)
- Balancisur Dagers
- Fire W es
~ , '..... Material Ib Zack P.O.
Zack will attempt to obtain F.O. Gravity desper OffR
- Air 2 nitors c of c .
cert.s not reviewed * . Zack toreview carts Sta.nles's Steel coil OtrR Ib AS1H year Zack to'obtain revised OGR ', *
,(No Zack P.O.) (Zadt will attempt to locats P.O.) .
Missing
- Zack will attapt to flint '
I I e e
- ...s.. r
. w o
1 1
~
i
....;*. IASAE.IE .
PAGE 14 CP g3 s... N:a . ITEM DESCRIPTION REQ'D. DOC. DISCREPANCY COMMENTS / PROPOSED RESOLUTION - 6 . 2041 , Angles OtrR Ib ASIWyr. Zack will obtain corrected CMIR a -
~^
. e e . .
I t 2Y/ Bolts, E , Washers OCR Wrong standard referenced Ehgineering disposition required
, ~
k (washers) .
.h e sait Missing Zack will attempt to find '
t 6:.11 Angles
- OCR ,Ib certs . Zack will attspti to obtain Of!R Possible engineering disposition .
+ .;u., Screws, washers, rivets C of C . Wrong standard reference Zack will attempt to obtain OUR' on t shers Possible engine & ring all=[wwition -
2x2(1/2) wire mesh C of C M) standard referenced Zack will' attempt to cidain O!TR . * .
\'
.s...
Missing
. Zack will attempt to 1ccate s 3 $
\i /. -
. t
,.n.. ,
s
. g' 4
e
' 9 s
* ( . .* .
O gJ 5 1 P . O . 5
- 1 .
E . , G A P N - O *. I T , U , L O e e e t e t t t a . S a a a c c E c c c R
- l o I c l o .
3 . D , o o o o E t t t t S t t O t t p . . P p u p. p m
. m . .
O R t a t e t
- m. t e s P . t t t t .,
/ a . a a a . -
S l l l l T l l l l i N i . i i w E w w w M k k k M c c +' c O a a a C E E - E 3 6 3 7
. 6 3
Y . 7 C r N o A f. P E R t s. C r S e4 I = c- 6 l
"D b3 77 f
C O D D R
'Q R .
E O . R - N . O, I
'T P -
I . R . C S sg E n D, i
. g g g r M n n. n #
t i s i s i s - l e T s s s g I i i n . E I M M Mtl . A I A S
- AI
. - 2; -
a
- _ e . i . /
3 3.. . _ . e
. . r' t.L . I n SrrES PACE 1 CF 10
.... 11:2 ITEM DESCRIPTION REQ'D.' DOC. DISCREPANCY ,
CONMENTS/ PROPOSED RESOLUTION
- a. tu '. Angles and bars OGR Heat I altered .3ack to obtain corrected O UR i
Blanket P.O. . l i ts . .8839 - 839-0 N/A Blanket P.O. Zack to correct the confusion of blanket P.O._ j , Ooils $449 - 450 - 451 tb physical testqs Zack to attempt to obtain phystr a1. test data
- r. . I 452 - 461 OGR .No AS1M yr. and corrected CWA i
No"AS1M . w, Angles, Bars, Sheets OCR Tubing 6x6x1/4 Zack to obtain correct OCR
- i i Sheets OCR *"
Certsl Zack tc attempt to obtain OCR j - .
- Ooils #462 - 463 - 482. -
- 499 - 500 - 501. - .
Ha rhysical tests
>te 502 'OGR (OK IaSalle) Eack to attempt to obtain physical test
- data
.. / .
J / I No AS1 W yr. designation Zack to attempt to obtain physical test data ' Tubing - AS1M A500 - Grade Of1R 16 physicals 1" sTAire x 1/8 and galvanizing certs on anterial -
/ n j
* / i
.} . . I , 1 1 1 ' i e 1 . i ; l 4 i j e
. . s ,, r
. , , . , , asg -
PAGE 2 OF 10
. .... !!a . IT'EM DESCRIPTION REQ'D. DOC. DISCREPANCY . COMMENTS /PROPOSEDRESOLh10t( ,
Angles ) No material certs . Zack to attanpt to obtain Ofm on mat;arial
~
- a. A Tubing ) Galvanizing Ofm . (Galvanizing order certs only) .
Angle Rings ) A .
.e Sheets Ofm M) AS1M yr. Zack to obtain' corrected Ofm ,.
s
,' .a Sheets ofm tb physical tests. Zack to obtain. physical tests and -awb4 tb AS1M yr. Ofm
~ '
No physical tests i Zack to obtain physical tests and corrected -
., Sh ts Of. M) ASm yr. .
Ofm Wrong staniard referenced
. Ib physical 069350
. Sheets, Otm No ASIM yr. Ehgineering dishition required Coils *f445 d'446 - . -
't 447 - 448 .Ofm N2 AS1H yr. Zack to obtala corrected OCR "dails8393-394- Ib AS1H yr. *
- 395 - 396 Ofm No physical test Zack to obtain physical test OGR ,
l! k e I
l
.: .h : AIL SIE S -
PAGE 3 CP 10
- .as. !!a . ITEM DE$0RIPTION REQ'D., DOC. DISCREPANCY COMMENTS /PROPOSEDRESOLtfTION, Cbils 8372 373 - 374 tb physicals for .
72 . 375 - 376 OGR 8372, 373, 37% Zack to obtain physical tests Ikiat IJ74278 , Cbils e385 - 386 - 716 387 - 388 Of!R m t hysical toits Zack to obtain physical tests
~
. / ..: Angle rings Of1R -
m certs for 2x2x3/16 tack to attaupt to obtain OffR for"2x2x3/16 angles stock - 762 Angle rings OCR 2 AS1W yr. Zack to obtain corrected OGR *' No physicals on 20 and 22 ga.
/ As Sheets OGR sheets (m for IaSalle) Zack to obtain Ihysical tests ,
- v m physical tests -
ist (bils 1426 - 427 - 428 OffR (M for IaSalle). Eack to obtain yhysical tests - Discrc[unt cotuth cn q
. . - Angles OGR galvanizing Eack to obtain ' corrected OGR .. j.
. l:.
. . w . t. .
0 l
, . . 9
.so: . AtL SITES . PAGE 4 OF 10 1.o. I!.) . ITEM DESCRIPT'IDN REQ'D. DOC. DISCREPANCY COMMENTS / PROPOSED RESOLUTION .
n bing. (tiubing A500 mtl.) Zack to obtain corrected Ocas ,'
.:.. 2 Bars OCR
- tb ASDVycar designation
- Digineering ' disposition required '(Clinton, IaSalle) '
Material Joes not meet Clintco, %-
.. Angles IaSalle specs. (mterial certi- .
Tubing OER . fled to A500 1974 - Midland Dvyineering disposition required ,. spec. 1977) ,.
~
Coils 1359 - 360 - 361 No physical tests \ .
,. ,... 362 - 363 OcR (OK Ia Salle) Zack to obtain OGR physical' tests te physical tests .
it i Bars, Aigles OER lten 5 (1/2x10" bar) , Zack to obtain OUR for, physical tests No ASUVyr. designation
- She.L Sheets - 14 ga. .
i./ Bar Ang19 s 2x2x1/4 2ack to attempt to acquire proper OUR Angles Of!R tb gitysicals - 14 ga. shcots 4 Sheets - i 14 ep.. OuR tb ASDVyr. designation Zack to obtain corrected O GR ** 16 sp. , i . * . tb physical tests * ', j Shoots OGR (OK - IASalle) 2atk to obtain I fiysical test results , , i -. s .
- - r t .
3 , b
, _ . . . .- . --- - - ~~ - - - - . .
} .
.;*... i.t1 SITES , PAGE $ OP 10 -
P..i. th , . ITEM DESCRIPTIfta REQ'D. DCO. DISCREPANCY , COMMENTS / PROPOSED RESOLUTION
~
' (bils $271 - 272 - 273 - m physical *:ests . . .
~
j_ <> 274 - 275 - 276 - chm (OK - Iasalle) Zack to obtain 5t iystnal test results 277 , Coils 8280 - 281 - 282 - Ho physical tdsts *
.1 283 - 284 - 285 - OttR (OK - IaSalle) Eack to obtain physical test results
. 286 - 287 - 304 i .Chils $351 - 352 - 353 - No AS*IWyear designation , ,
354 OftR M2I tysicals Zack to obtain , corrected OtrRs Chils 8315 316 - m AS1M year - i, : : 317 - 318 OUR m Itysical tests Eack to obtain corrected Omts , Ooils f338 - 339 - ,. ,
. i: 340 - 341 Of!R 2 ASIWyear designation Zack to obtain revised OUR "
(blis 0355 - 356 - - .
- s. I 357 - 358 OGR m AS1M year Zack to obtain revised OttR
- 8 . g o'
.. Shcets OftR to corts _
2.3ck to obtaint Oft 1ts .,
~
.I
.,.s,.
i - e I
9
- ; . - ,o
- f. t . . AIL SITES .. PAGE 6 OF 10 '
I . n . I'.7. ITEM DESCRIPTION REQ'D. DOC. DISCREPANCY COMMENTS / PROPOSED RESOLUTION , d coils 9237 - 238 - No AS1M year Zack, to obtain resiised Omts .
...: 239 - 240 OGR Ib Ihysical tests -
Zack'to obtain physical test results -
/
No ghysical tests t
.. . Sheet OGR (OK - facille) Zack to obtain physial test results ,
s .
.. Duct Sealer C of C No certs -
Eack to obtain C of C Coils'0267 - 268 - ins 269 - 270 OGR No AS1H year ,. , Zack to obtain revised Omts
- 0)ils 8307 - 308 - ,
. . . 309 - 310 OGR NoASKyeardesignation Zack to obtain revisart Omts
'Doils $495 .496 - . .
.! s 497 - 498 OGR N) AS1M yr. Zack to obtain corrected OGR **
e . .. , g S g 6 Shcets ' OnR to AS1M yr. Zack to obtain corrected OGR l - O I i . . e 5 1' O
s .. d gggs- . PAGE 7 OF 10 t .... ::.. . ITEM DESCRIPTION REQ'D~. DOC. DISCREPANCY COMMENTS / PROPOSED RESOLUTION' ,
~
- l .. l u Bar ,, OtrR tb r.C. certs Zack to obtain OtrR for 1048-1 1048-1'3x8 Bar m prysicals ,
n.ru Sheets. OCR tt) AS'IM yr. Eack to attempt to obtain gihysical test data . !
. . .=
,. l..... Sheets OGR No chanical data- Zack to attempt,to obtain physical test data f
Iw; Square tubig . OGR- Ib certs -,1095-5 Zack will attempt to obtain Ottms - *
~
' No ical tests Sheets - 12,ga. OCR 2ack to attsupt._to obtain gihysical data #
.i.. (OK hlle) ,
. . Na physical data on coil 8576
- . . -Q>ils $575 - 576 otrR (OK Jah11c) 24 tic to attempt to obtain gitysical daE
=9 e ,
3 O +
~
I
~~-
- = , . s.
j *. i . 2 - . i i I 1 - 9 4 e
e *
.s . .. .
AIL SITES. .. PAGE. 8 CF 10
- 1 '
s.(s. No. ITEM DESCRIPTION REQ'D. DOC. DISCREPANCY COMMENTS /PkOPOSED RESOLUTION ,
. .s e i T e lsup . 011R m AS1Wyr. Eack to obtain corrected OcR .- .
r
- s .
v Hex bolts 2 AS1H yr. , Eack will attmpt to obtain corrected OUR '
. . . Hex nuts OGR m reference to zinc spec. Possible engineering diepnmition required ,.
(bils 8257 - 258 - 259 , m t hysical test data
.s 260 - 261 - 262 - Of1R m AS1 W yr, designation Epck will attempt to obtain gitysical te[t ORR
- 263 - 264 - 278 -
- 279 j s . .o s Pop rivets OCR m certs
- Eack will attmpt to obtain OER -
t
. Ibssible 9 4- _ing dispbsition required 4
i: .. Malleable claup, 3/8" OCR m certs , Eack will attempt to obtain OWR l Pnamihim engineering disposition required 1
. .. Wrcng plat standard, Eack will attempt to obtain correct ORR
./.I Hex nuts and bolts OER referenmd - C of C only Ibssible anat---ine dispamitica required **
7 . l . ,'/ Wrong plating standard refe-~ fack will attempt to othain correct OGR
. Itxt (threaded) Ons renced - C of C only ,
Possible enginesti ng disposition required
, i !
/
I ' d
\.
.'.. In, Snys ..
PAGE' 3 OF 10
.e. r. ITEM DESCRIPTION REQ'D. DOC. DISCREPANCY COf9 TENTS / PROPOSED RESOLUTIOtt
. Eack will attempt to otdain correct OGR
- s. ws hts **
OGR m plating standard referenced Possible engineering dispnmitics required e/s:1 Batt hinge OGR No certs Zack will attempt to obtain OGR - e- Vent Glas .(12") C of C - 34) certs . zack will attempt to obtain OER e
,r e
. 1 : :. Tek Screws C of C No standard referenced Eadt to obtain corrected C of C ..
a: . 'Dek screws C of C .. Ma stan,dard referenced . Zack to obtain corrected C of C .
= .
Hex nuts and bolts OGR 34) plating standard referenced possible engineering dispasitica requir 1, Colls $347 - 348 - No physical tests ,
. 349 - 350 OfIR (OK Ia Salle) , . 1v* to attempt to obtain ptysical test data t
. g f
a
.P i hg U
- R -
~~ .
- g. .
4 E ...
~
g .
. .B .
B e . I g
. ; e, R -
i t l *g g 9 2
# p
# 4 O
W 3 E - W t 3 - g A u .a . 5 a
- ~
a 8 S M -
- 9 a u .
8 a-o E s A M
- K .
U
- M f
- a 1 1- .
" -l 3 .
$ $ '~ ,,
-f '
; :C: , .
i* ; 0 .
- i . -
g . n
g:~ . .
^
l_ASAll'F COUNTY .
~
HVAC SYSTEMS e DEFINITIONS . e HVAC SYSTEMS . e AREAS SERVED / FUNCTION e ZACK COMPANY SCOPE e SYSTEM DIAGRAMS _
~
e MATERIAL REQUIREMENTS e MATERIAL PROPERTIES e MATERIAL FURNISHED
-e DISPOSITION OF CEC 0 NCR'S #556, 557, 558,.566 & 594 i
p
- z. -
__,m.. - ,_
.,,.y ,,,. .,4.__, ~,. -w _~ _ , . ,_ ,. - -
~~ - ^
J . . .__. . . . . . . ., .1.f. c. . . :. T.1.1.__. ._ _:_1.1. ... . . . T DEFINITIONS A. Nuclear Safety-Related Function , Any function necessary to assure: [
- 1. The integrity of the reactor coolant pressure boundary or primary coolant boundary,
- 2. Tne capability to shutdown the reactor and maintain it in a safe shutdown condition, or
- 3. The capability to prevent or mitigate the consequences of conditions of design which could result in potential off-site exposures that are a significant fract' ion of Title 10, Code of Feoeral Regulations, Part 100, " Reactor Site Criteria."
- 8. Safety-Related HVAC Systems (Engineered Safety Feature Systems)
Those heating, ventilating, air conditioning, or air cleaning systems wnich provide necessary support to enable nuclear safety-related functions to be performed. Specific objectives are to:
- 1. Provide suitable environment foY plant personnel so they may perform required nuclear safety-related functions.
~
- 2. Provide a suitable environment for nuclear safety-re1ated plant.
equipment so it may perform required nuclear s'afety functions.
- 3. Control, limit, or prevent the release or transfer of airborne radiological contaminants and intake of nazardous chemicals that could affect nuc1' ear. safety functions.
C. Non-Saf'ety Related-Seismic
- Tnose HVAC Systems or portions of HVAC or air cleaning systems which, although not requirred to function, are required to retain their structural integrity (i.e. remain in place during and after an SSE) so as not to prevent the operation of other nuclear safety related systems.
D. Non-Safety-Related - (Non-Seismic) HVAC Systems - Tn,ose systems or portions of HVAC or air cleaning systems whose operation or structural integrity is not required to support nuclear ~ safety-related f unctions. E. Commercial Grade Quality Mercnant or common grade materials, components, or appu'rtenances that are customarily used in industrial and commercial HVAC applications and which are readily available, catalog-type ("off-the-shelf") items. No special manufacturing processes are required, over and above, the normal industry practice, to enhance the items' cnaracteristics.
F. Special Quality , . N Material, components, or appurtenances that are special~ order,~ custom ~ made as required when end use, method of fabrication or, subsequent ~- processing treatment requires quality characteristics not availble in' merchant or commercial grade quality (e.g., high strength, low alloy,
~
quencher or special Killed steel $). #' s
/
i
/
1849L*
------..-_9 _ _
. LASALL3 COUiiTY .
HVAC SYSTEMS SAFETY d LATED /tEISiIIC - % Control Room HVAC (VC) ".
'e Auxiliary Electric Equipment Room HVAC (VE)
Diesel Generator Facilities Ventilation (VD)
Switchgear Heat Removal Ventilation (VX)
'(ECCS) Equipment Area
, Emergency Cooling (' Core VY) Cooling System
- Standby Gas Treatment System (S3TS)' (VG)
Limited Fortions of Reactor Building Ventilation and Frimary Containcent Purge NCN-SAFETY RELATED/SEIS!."IC
- Primary Containment (Drywell') Ventilation (VP)
- Primary Containment Purge, Fortions (VQ)
Reactor Building Ventilation System (VR) NCLSAFETY RELATEDA*0N-SEISI.iIC
Auxiliary Building Office HVAC (VA) -
River and Lake Screen House V,entilation (VH)
- Kachine Shop Ventilation (VJ)
- Auxiliary Building Laboratory HVAC (VL)
Off-Gas Building HVAC (VO) . Service Building HVAC (VS) y Turbine Building Ventilation (VT) 5 Radwaste Ventilation (V4)
'\
Pawe 1 i IASALLE COUNTY ; HVAC SYSTdlJ.S. /%
^
Safety.Helated HVAC Systems -- Areas Served - Function .
- 1. Control Room HVAC p/
A Train and B Train . Unit 1 & 2 Control Room Provide Habitable zone / for Main' Security Center radiological and haz, chemical l Storage Room protect, ion. - L Provide temperature control for - personnel comfort and equipment. operation. Maintain positive pressure. l 2. Auxiliary Electric Eauipment Roon HVAC A Train and B Train Unit.1 Auxiliary EE Room Provide' habitable zone for
~ Unit '2 Auxiliary EE Room
. radiological and haz chemical Computer Room .
protecti'n for remote plant Computer Storage j shutdown.
. Provide' temperature control for . personnel comfort and equipment
!. operation. Maintain positive pressure. 3 Diesel Generator Facilities .
- Ventilation -
Unit 1 Diesel Gen. Room Vent Unit 1 Diesel Gen. & Provide temperature control for
. Diesel Oil Rooms D-G , MFCS switchgear and Pamps Standby, Diesel Gen. Room Vent Standby Diesel Gen. & rooms when equipment pperates.
Diesel Oil Rooms Unit i HPCS D-G Room Vent Unit 1 HFCS Diesel Gen. & Provide ventilation of diesel oil Diesel Oil Rooms and day tank rooms. L . Unit 1 HPCS SdGR/ Pump Rm Vent ' Unit 1. HFCS S.JGR & Pump Rms. Unit 2 Diesel Gen. Room Vent Unit 2 Diesel. Gen. &
~
Diesel Oil Rooms . Unit 2 HPCS D-G Room Vent Unit 2 HFCS Diesel Gen. & ' Diesel Oil Roons . Unit 2 HPCS SdGR/ Pump Rm Vent Unit 2 HFCS SilGR & Pump Rms ! F 1 e I
LASALLE COUNTY HVAC SYSTEI.'S Page 2 . Safety Related HVAC Systems Areas Served EMBE112B -
- 4. Swi tch ear Hea.t[ Removal
- Unit 1 Reactor Frotection System Unit 1 Reactor Protection Sys. Provide ventilation for 1.G Set Room Vent 14G Set Rm & 48V Battery Room temperature control for-a Cable Spreading Room equipment operability -
Unit 1 Ess Swgr Div I Vent Unit 1 Ess .Div I Swgr Room & 125 V Battery Room Provide ventilation l'or Unit 1 Esa Swgr Div II Vent Unit 1 Eos Div II Swgr Room & battery rooms. 125v Battery Room ' Unit 2 Rx Protection System Unit 2 Rx Frotection System ' i,G Set Room Vent EG Set Rm & 40V Battery Room *
& Cable Spreading Room -
Unit 2 Ess Swgr Div I Vent Unit 2 Ess Div I Swgr & 125V Battery Room
- Unit 2 Ess Swgr Div II Vent Unit 2 Ess Div II Swgr & 125V Eattery Room -
5 ECCS Eauipment Area Cooline Unit 1 RHR Fump 1A Cubicle Provide Temperature control Cooler Unit 1 RHR Pump 1p Cubicle Unit 1 HFCS Fump Cubicle Cooler for ECCS pump operability.. Unit i HPCS Pump Cubicle Unit 1 RHR Pump 1B and 1C Unit 1 RHR 1B & 10 Pump Cubicle Cubicle Cooler L Unit 1 LICS & ROIC Pumps Unit 1 LPCS & RCIC Pump Cubicle . . Cubicle Cooler. Unit 1 RHR Sw Pump A & B Unit 1 RHR Sw Pump A & B Cubicle Cubicle Cooler Unit 1 RHd Sw Pump C & D Unit 1 RHR Sw Pump C & D Cubicle Cubicle Cooler Unit 2 '.Sa'me as Above. Unit 2 - Same as Above. , ,
- 6. Standby Gas Treatment Unit 1 L 2 SGTS Trains Unit 1 Reactor Building Maintain negative pressure Unit 1 Drywell & Suppression in reactor building and drywell. "
Pool Chamber Unit 2 Reactor Building Remove radioactive iodine from Uni't 2 Drywell & Suppression post accident reactor building t Fool Chamber offluent. . ' 9 0
. . . , 1-LASALLE COUNTY HVAC SYS's'M.iS f are 'l Safety Related HVAC Systems Arcan Served Function .
7 Reactor BuildiBd' vent Unit 1 & 2 Reactor Building Unit 1 Reactor Building Isolate supply and exhaust Supply and Exhaust Isolation Unit 2 Reactor Building ducts for Reactor Building . Vent System post accident.
- 8. Primary Containment Purae .
Unit 1 & 2 Containment Unit 1 & 2 Primary and
- Isolate Primary and Secondary Isolation Secondary Containment containment supply and exhaust pipes post accident.
G O e
,QO 6 9
9 e 4
l ShETYRELATED AC SYSTEM AND EQUIP)lfNT CHECKLIST LASAL__ N CLEAR GENERATING STATION Items Identified On Safety Related HVAC Systems SCOPE OF HVAC WORK System Acronym VC VD VE VG VX VY , s Furnished By Zack. Installed By Zack X X X
- X X Ductwork I X X - X X S'upports X X X -
X X Welding Refrigerant Piping X - X - - - Purchased By Zack. Installed By Zack
~
X X X
- X 'X Fasteners X X X
- X X Sealants S$L X X X X X X Flexible Connections X X X -
X X Access Doors X X - - - Refrigerant Specialtier - Fire Dampers X .X X - X X. X X - - X - Gravity Shutt'ers X X X - X ,X Balancing Dampers , X X X' - X X Grilles, Registers and Dif fusers ' X X X X X Airflow Measuring Stations , X - X - X - Silencers ,
- X - - X -
. Filters- ,
- y Purchased By CECO, Installed By Zack X - X - - X eIt Exchange Coils and Cabinets X- X X -
mcspheric Clean-Up Filter Units X
-6Vaneaxial Fans
# X X X -
X f' ) Centrifugal Fans X X - - X Xi g - i Cooled Condensing Units X - X - - g X. X X - X X,
@ Isolation Dampers X -- -
Check Dampers I
- Limited Scope i.e. Less 5 Feet Of Ductwork. '
! t
i .
~ . . . . . . - - .
jL
.i 4 k g . .. ..
3 .. . _. .
. . _ _ . _ . . . e b 2.
. .j ._,.. , ! . . .
C w 3. _ g , a. d,t, 2. J 2
- u b
.g k
$$y 0 ) h. 4 D g , l s 8
_ _ - e gQy . . . . 7 > b j i( ,# 8 aj- : ' '
~ 55% .
l aj
,. EEg Nw.. l'. _.. ..
-_;_,... g yIhlgJ 4;g : , . ._ ; .. _
;_. g _. p'W .p- _ ..[, . .
- f. q
,. t---- - .; g y-- .
p-- _ g _. . . . . ., g. .
~ . . . . _ . - -
9 EEI ysy e, 2 B y..._.- 2g
.m y . _.
.i - .. _-
.- .y
. . . . .,V . . .
i .... 7O
. 7) i
. _. . / I
.q . ..
i
.n
,g . . (PNo- -
)Z , -
m <. L..u4
. G,, }.
. f ..ge. Q
-o .. . o ..
- c. 2 f . -
k.. ; ! c. : j c.
-S "4 ,.
- 3. g. . - _ ..
_! .,i . .- . .. Q . G. . . . .j . _ i_y p ..
! .: . .. _. . . . . _ . i. -
.g .. . . . ' .. ... . 1. .
...i...-. __ 7. . ..g g , .
g . g___.
.k. p _.
i i t.'.'". c - JE . . _ . = w f .C.', . V ..
- d. 6
__.+....._... .g g .. _4 ,._ .... g @. ..
.s WMs w n: p. .
3
. . . . _ ,. -- __. .. =
M i6 I e , d
- k. .. .
.7 , = .. ....
{ e
.h a 2 ",,,4, . .. _ _ _ . .. ... . . . _ .
= . _ . @g : e c
,, .. . . - . . _ .1 . . .
- . - D . . --
9 .%5* ' % d6 { f ***
.* i -
i]4 sT- \e 2! - Y "J' -I -, . 3
. . , _ . . . ,, 4. g 7 . .a # i. - .. - . _ - . .
g .Eh5 -. . $c.t .g . o,. . .. .' i L_
. ... c g
.1 c . _
.( n g- ..
.,......e,.2 i : !
,r -t v
- m. . . . _ _ . .
_...q . w< w3 I
' . '. ; ; e-r., )w
. i !DA t
..( . . . . . . _ . . . . . _i . tt ..
" +- t _.
1 e (0 . .. .. . _1 . T. qi .
-L
_ 7 .'" 4% e' *.? _ . _ . . _,._,s . ..... . . .
,~ sa A
. . . . ,. t , . .-..
- 3. g k, s4 Q ___, _ l.1 4 ,. ..
. ~; , ' ,
,e i . _ _ . . _ _ _
.5 I i
--8 I gQ lb J
9 l.,
.. _..._._.p..
. . . N i., k. t .o
. _ .. .g NNNK si 1 .ba$. 9.4. .N. ..
i 'i U__ -. i_. _.._~4 . a& g ...$1T...NN .. .4L .. _
- i . .a k/W :
. _a . . .i. .
7 , 4 ... .g 6 .. * * - + e i
.. g, . . .
1 6 ib _ . m ._. .. _ . . _ .. . .. g . _. l .-. ~ . _... -..- ... 5- .,. 4 3
.* u -
_~u
.g
.y w, . -
U_ - 1
% % b e% k 6 % .% % & % % % ' % . %% %- .
I l l < l I
l a ' J' l kN j
~
1g.!, 3 ;!,lp lb i.i : ... *.J 11 id g'y* []
, 3 g
' $ii I!l jal filles ~
p:,
"klf ;fIj ' .. i.-
- - i g1 r ;( u" h *
. II I", !
$! 3 }1 i.ih: .
aJ lt i I i
. .I! ,.
it 7 _33
- - p.
i =t;..i: i . . d l 15 ff 4 M is j 3i e - h!j jfl! ! N ! l!Il* lii. @
' W n
9 $ ". eS % l i e\ I
- b. ] 5 g 5$d M4 i.
., j,
,1 j a h I!
s
';i Pl! s loi q int 9 -
is y1 ;;j!(I!' M.i . el
~
.fi' -
[ ; - lj{, i -
!! "gW5.$, DEJ J
. n.q:
im ' i ==4 <..
~
si b "t i 19 - N . l ' t i ,, .tr : (d.] j ur sa' 1 [ } i s{. .
!i
- j si
'i ' ,," ili Ih= ! ,
-l:
m .! I
' l- 8 n . , . , . , - a -
1 i 6 Y,.,.? _ . . .
~
l
~.
l . .
! . t . s s
, . s - 1
- 0 !! y
@ !N' tll. -
%. ..I.:.
l, .
.. q E5835l 'i.;
i* i! t,!! .- d - d}Tkid-M a$ 3 p!gri7g I w.w a .: i!v!!l'h; g llg' ll 8! ! I n i !!
. wn. cf.y 1,ii
- d..a,li *II*
*
- h*! '
~^
Ik 3 r\lf H 8 b w- H l
- h,:: .h!! ~
II lh i s N
- i. . % 4,l l ;1 I,3 y: Lg .
- gi r~3 6 9
i n %- l Lr g4 e r lh j[ '* ;' da - i 4 iI >! 3 jl+ , y 1! 1. .. iji+ o !!! 4 _. =. l.. l !!;: -G ., . i, i..!Y,J,,g;my
.f , r % .)y, a,+,;%lb ff .!N I*
S '
' r'.E ,[- U
. ; a-
- =) !.!!,
i, r . h I !.a g.,t_dL5 , [ '-QP.I- _. l u E flidal,s;, -
,a i fd IIi1 : .M.il,
- . . - _ . ., s ._: ;i , .
I!~! 00 ' l I
' uh.
'?. !!
j -
; erm -i.
Pgi!!I L- '
- Il' "l!!g{ !*
l . , . l "g 11 i e t. . .
'I ,
, i. , .
. , . , . .g .
I 1
\ '
I C ) l
^ '
L g . i ,.4 . ! . . . y r- :
;l.!'s,i I i1 .
5 i
!i !i : ~J1 8 ~!.: : 5 glijila1l.!;!!![
j,' 0 filif lj 1!. ' i
~ '
(s lh m ,., .t g9. .g, , g< o ~i m! ! W, !!! .:h;dl, iit' w lill -.i
--. n! ;
p j' i ,
~
, -l 33 g/ gi i [d! ' f
!!,i illlj!j!(:iktgirM l11
[m ai dddit , M :!
*- j , ;,: -J- -
i t. j, liinlii11, l;]. si [iUN
.. . si ! 11 31 ;ji u , ii;i -
;p,ii-i, y' g _
II. . he a1 , i - 1111!
!d d d
[ 7 l
!i., i.
twL_L , .. ll[jj L , , i i
- r, W ;
gn l .p r25' %,.!
;-ila 1 .
(j !,11 g- as i m I;ijji i 11 5 % $ g'N E
's,' l, .
il i. i i 1 t
--- i L._."
I g, . - 3,l, i! I g .
- '-+'
"i (i$ e:(aj)@I+'l*;i *),. l 1 =,I il{ill!
i ii
**i!!'
- n.
O'l @ EN!,l '2 8 155l ! l, il..Lg . 8!!g;~lL Uf
% gill-
- p. ,..
g - i 3E l *$ 11 i I I I .,g gg! g@ @r 11,l e&Q i las gl. su @,, a - l NLJ 1 lil! '""!j pT h!. - l t, ! i.i, ! I i i __, , . . . . .. . . . . __ i a
e - * . -
! 4 . i . .
. , i Ig) -g8 Sf l.."
I- !9 fiii -' i;h%
- W !b $- -
)# C',$
m,.g y
*T
,_jg3 ,,
est .j ! .m
--- - ,- -2_
t.jf - N
' I'g.!)) ina
- 8 ' ! ?'dT ra n . . * . - - - -
"' i is, (gresci,G j jiglp id! r-!n@d 1 r pl.-
- J. r 1 .t Iil
' . i ij, in Gea;. .ii -li! i i C Ni!!dj[j!@jji H!O 1
- ,dr! M2r' ' '
ip@ r. i . ! _ %w; . . .
].!l E !t 's l y
e ; ..= :.: .=. sil- : <1 ,., D i -
- C v n !i f.) a ,
- l ;1 q y
%+
q .: .. . 3
-t b; W_9 w; e u
- r. -a d % **
%*A
-- e w .
% c. % .
i T I,gl!.:.
' : 1';m rn GLA rd" .U.Ar +N *'L -
e. u. a m , ei i , W.i, h.
.'l i., : ,
1., r.i.;.l w .m
. p g., t 1 1, gp.
,e ,3, :3. -
,gI;5 @ N -- p w!! = '-, i,,i l
-- 16- ;ir, !
e l l Ir li t l pI- @ri Mi gp "qi 5-i r - - i.. i i
!$ L- 'pL-$1l,%
375- ( : ,M(pr --a , 3: 5 [-ll Lg
- f ,1 -
s i- .u - , .
.rjgt , ;Ua ,, g a ...
g i. l jH i ;e.P !!! .i i
! gh:i 3 iit'! # .
._ A ! a - 1 is ' I'j .i 11 Is ,. r
'c 588
- n.G.-
d l'+c 8 z %.r
- I
-W ,.
78 ,
- I jt ps
.]. . . . - s.:
.I E1 i! % ~ T- 5 ly 's t 5* -
h,.p!!!! h- P'-li .-) i: I O. au -
, a
. g] ..,il. ,. s 38 S u j
1;
~
.f- 6r F1 tii s E- .li :
II! n .,' ..- 3 i jI $ 9G.ed[.!;dCmLDl Oc4D,f I i!! [hL ii.it gi tu 1=
.s m
. _ 3 .
m" E 4;1
@ j O P @7(.;,.a-r.m"/e*-,3:T@
. 1 r
- g. ,n.n i
- p. q.-g 'g; a - r. - 2y.;'vrp NW 3n y.- e_a u,
N I
- 7 gs e+
3 W
- yf f.. f 9
a .. ? a..'.7. ""*,"." J O74 m 3 W i e..
.imI
'P f i 7mm it - -
i , .
.f _ . . , .
f
1 C..-. -.> . s. , , , , , , . , , , . S i l!,;ii
'@ r,h 8 ici;y
.- I, p 3
. j. :g i!: . _
e j;l ir , 1 p$. il ~p' N 9 il ;_ 'iN A-I j;a, .!!!!!
~ '
! q'
~
,.- !il!yA } lit .'
!il;hl?@
a
. m s ...
'!!!!I! Ip E5 lliU hi l' ,lii . . $.i.i ..
("
' b. - - .
L @,c e n W, , j
. . Iljjh ie
. di,Y q r - -
s 's se , , , . 5 _ si I -
'h!!! S i[
1:ls e !!j.a lil e 1
, oi .
.t ,!!,
. L Ill!'
i j{ O ll O ' Ehfil@l* gi _ ,i !!i !!! lilii . J!!Q
.. I!ib! I 'i
- 3' llp- I !$ij
~
lb ,
~
,j,j',
" ef(dhAllkhihil[II'!l .
i
!!!j3 & l!$ G- !b 6- hi iini nie @d:! 4 6wir1 i 1 eimi!9 (ird>! -
!!h l .-.
, ,. lii lik lik _
, 11 !
; n n- g g g W .
I 1 i. _ p . . g = l ' t i *0 Z. -
~
r I I
\
.c , ~
i . LaSalle County Nuclear Station M'aterial Requirements for HVAC Ductwork Systems _
~x Tne LaSalle County HVAC Work Specification J-2590 requires that th'e HVAC ducts be made of galvanized sheet metal conforming to the requirements of ASTM A-527 for up to 16 gauge thickness and ASTM A-526 for 14 gauge and over. Tne companion flange angles and stiffening angles are specified as ASTM A-36 (ASTM A-575 for angles less than 2-1/2" x 2-1/2" x 1/4").
Hanger supports are specified as ASTM A-36. The specification further states the required thickness and angle iron stiffening and flange joints to De used for botn seismic (safety-related and non-safety-related) and non-seimsic (non-safety-related) applications. Tne physical design drawings indicate tne size of hanger angles. The material used for tnis application is no different from that used in any industrial or commercial application. Euclear power plant galvanized ducts, angles and hangers.do not have any additional requirements placed on the manufacturing of this material. The galvanized ducts, angles and hanger steel must simply conform to the specified ASTM standard. . It is also important to point out that~tnere are no national codes which specifically govern tne design, fabrication, or installation of HVAC systems such as tnere are f or power plant piping, which is cove' red by ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Codes. In fact, the only national standard wnien covers duct systems is ANSI N509 " Nuclear Power Plant Air Cleaning Units and Components" whicn states ' requirements f or air cleaning ducts only. . This. standard, written initially in 1976 and extensively revised in 1980, states that galvanized sneet material for air cleaning ducts shall conform to ASTM A-527/A-526. No specific material documentation is required. Tne federal regulation.which addresses the requirements fo'r documen'tation is 10CFR50, Appendix B. Section VII, Control of Purchased ~ Material, Equipment, and Services. It states i. hat " documentary.eyiden.ce that oaterial and equpment conform to the procurement requirements shall be - available at tne nuclear power plant site prior to installation br use of sucn material,and equipment. Tnis documentary evidence shall be sufficient to identify the specific requirements, such as codes, standards, or specifications met by the purchased material and equipment." Since tnere are no nationa1 codes or standards which specify the documentation required, the documentation requirements are the responsibility of tne Purchaser (and his A-E) to define. As a minimum, evidence which indicates the material conforms to the specified material is all tnat is required. For this application which uses standardized, l commercial-grade material, a certificate of conformance would be l acceptable. 1 1
., A ' m A._ , .. . _ _ _ _ ., l
.~ ~. . ... .. -
. 7 _. : .. . i .
LaSalle County HVAC. Wor'k Specification J-2590 however included standardized QA srticles (prepared-mainly for ASME B&PV code systems). These require tne following: 'x s ; x . Two (2) copies of all appropriate documentation,.as hereinafter sp'ecified, or as required by applicable code, standard,,and criteria s h'al l be-sussTtt ed . . . A list of the minimum required documentation with references where they are define'd is as follows:
- a. Certified Material Test Report, which shall include the actual results of all chemical analyses.and mechanical tests required by the material specifications and actual results of a.ll other tests required by material specification. [ ,
- b. Welding Material Test' Report.
- c. Radiographic Certification.
- d. Repair Weld Certification. ,
- e. Eddy Current Test Report.
- f. Hydrostatic Testing and/or Pneumatic Testing Report.
- g. Leak Test Report.
l
- h. Heat Treatment'(Time and Temperature Charts).
- 1. Material Identification and Marking (Traceability).
- j. Filler Metal Traceability on Pressure Retaining Welds.
- x. Welder Qualification Report.
- 1. Nondestructi.ve Testing Personnel Qualification. Report.
1
- m. Code Data Report, including nameplate date and rubbing.
I After award, a meeting was held with Tne Zack-Company, Commonwealth Edison Company and Sargent & Lundy to clarify the QA requirements. Item a above was clarified to only apply to duct sheets, angles and supports. Typical welding rod material' certificates were also requested for noncode weld rod, which is in accordance with AWS 5.01. For the remainder of the work, certificates of conformance were required. Nonconformancesconcerningthegalvanizedsheetsteelandangleironwere submitted by The Zack Company to Commonwealth Edison Company in late 1981 and early 1982. Tnese nonconformances were for documentation deficiencies (i.e., documentation which did not meet specification l requirements) and not material deficiencies. These nonconformances were l evaluated to determine if there wascsufficient documentation available to l verify if specified materials or materials equivalent to or exceeding specified materials were provided. i l l .
. .-. .. -......- .. . ......-. . ------ -.- -.... = = = - . - . . . . - . . . . . . . . . .
Other documents sucn a's steel company invoices and Zack purchase orders 1 chich indicate.fgr example ASTM A-527 or lock forming quality (LFQ) i I galvanized steel', provide adequate assurance that the specified materials'were provided. Since these materials are identical to those l aaterials routinely used in industrial and commercial appligations, and tne steel manufacturers have been producing tnis material to a nationally recognized standard for many, many years, tne history of this standardized product indicates a satisf actory performance and quality. In addition, these materials have low carbon content, less than 0.3% by tneASTMspecificationsanditiswellknownthatjowcarbonsteelmetal exnioits yield stresses of a minimum of 35,000 psi . The seismic safety-related duct system assumes an allowable stress of 18,000 psi maximum witn many ducts seeing less tnan that. Thus, considerable margin exists in the system design witn the normal production quality ASTM aaterial. A comparison of the commercially av&ilable materials that could'possibly be used for ducts, stiffeners and angles confirms that the eajority of the materials have yield stresses in excess of 30,000 psi. Tne worse possible case (ASTM A663, Standard Specification for Merchant Quality Hot-Rolled Carbon Steel Bars subject to Mechanical Property Requireme.nts) exhibits a minimum yield of 22,500 psi. This is still anove tne 18,000 psi design value. Thus, even if the worse possible steel was used, the yield stress would not be exceeded. (Refer to the attacned discussion on " Material Specification and Mechanical Properties for Galvanized Sneet Steel and Stiffener, Hanger, and Support Steel" for additional information). It snould also be pointed out tnat none of tne nonconformances submitted involve tne. sheet metal clauae or angle size and ; n i c k na c t _ Za k J u s ... .. t . g..urication t' ckets and auct construcuion details indicate
~
- tna sneet metal gauge. Tnis is checked during snop inspection.
All of tnese factors'were. involved in our review of the materia _1 documentation nonconformances to the specification requirements and l allowed us to accept the alternate documentary ev.idence. IASTM A-527 is referred to as lock forming quality (LFQ) in its title. ASTM A-526 is referred to as commercial quality (CQ). These terms are i acceptable alternates for tne ASTM designation. i l 2 T .B. Jefferson, Metals and How to Weld Them, (The Welding Encyclopedia), Second Edition, i I 1 l
- ,m
. . . n .-. . -.
-_:-~.-.--.--.-.. . ;
l Material Specification and Mechanical Properties
~'
for Galvanized Sheet Steel. and Stiffener Hanger,-and Support Steel ', We have reviewed the properties of the available materials for sheet steel, stiffeners, hangers, and supports and compared them to properties of the material specif,1ed in Specification J-2590, JVAC Work. The onclosed table. Material Specification and Mechanical Properties, lists the possible sheet and angle materials and corresponding mechanical properties. Tne minimum yield strength for all tabulated sheet steel caterials is 34,000 psi and for angle materials is 22,500 psi. The seismic analysis of the ductwork and support systems utilized a design yield strength of 18,000 psi. Therefore, materials routinely purchased by The Zack Company would satisfy the design requirements of Specification J-2590. Stiffener, hanger, and support angles used by The Zack Company have typically been purchased from Northwestern Steel and Wire Company. Angles of a size 3" x 3" x 1/4" and larger are normally produced to ASTM Specification A36 which has a minimum yield strength of 36,000 psi. Angles 2-1/2" x 2-1/2" x 1/4" and smaller are normally produced to ASTM A36 or ASTM 575. ASTM 575 does not require physical property tests as ' part of its specification. However. based upon our discussions with Northwestern, their typical Mechanical properties for the grade of steel specified (M1020), the lowest grade available (M1008), and two intermediate grades (M1010 and M1015) range from 34 ksi to 37.2 ksi minimum yield strength as shown on the attached tabulation. Another possible substitution to the above materials is ASTM A663, Standard Spe.cification.for Merchant Quali.ty Hot-Rolled Carbon Steel Bars subject to.Mechanica1 Property Requirements although this is not a normal product for ductwork. Grades 45, 50, and 55 represent the worse possible
. cases.with a minimum yield strength of 22,500 psi, and as stated above, l exceed our design minimums.
Galvanized sheet steel used by The Zack Company has typically been purchased from Inland Steel Company and other similar reputable companies. Galvanized sheet steel, unless specifically identified l otherwise, is normally produced to ASTM Specifications A526 or A527. These specifications do not require physical property , tests as part of their specifications. However, Inland Steel Company periodically obtains nachanical property data on these materials as part of their quality control program. The mechanical properties listed in the attached table are representative of the values obtained from this testing program. Other possible types of galvanized sheet steel are also shown on the attached tabulation. These represent the minimum mechanical properties available for sheet steel, and as stated above, exceed our design einimums.
One otner alternative to purchasing galvanized sheet steel. manufactured to ASTM A526/527.would be to purchase uncoated sheet steel from the steel mill and then nave it galvanized elsewhere. Procurement in tnis manner would not change tne cnaracteristics of the sneet steel as the uncoated-caterial would have'been produced at ASTM A366, Standard Sp6cification for Steel, Carbon, Cold-Rolled Sheet, Commercial Quality or: ASTM A569, Standard Specification for Steel, Carbon (0.15 Maximum, Percent), Hot-Rolled Sheet and Strip, Commercial Quality. -These specifications have tne same chemical composition as~ materials produced to ASTM A526 or , A527 and therefore, are equivalent. Other forms of galvanized sheet, e.g., "Paintgrip", "Electrogalvanized", are different coating variations to tne same case metals and carry the same ASTM designation for the base metal. Since the specified materials are very common to the HVAC industry, material substitution is not very probanie. However, this should eliminate any concern witn respect to the hypothetical question of what is the worse that could happen *if the wrong material was furnished.
~
h 9 f h
/
j
, 1 -
4
. , e
- l
, Paga 1 of 2 MATERIAL SPEctFTCATTDN APM MECHANTCAL PROPERTIES
- FOR GALVANTTED SHEET STREL AMD STIFFENER HANCER, AND SUPPORT STIEL 4
.* MSCNANICAL PROPERTIES MATERIAL SIZE IIAL N UM MmmuM SPECIFICATION SPECIFICATION TITLE
- YZELD TENSILE g
STRENGTH STRENGTH PSI PSI
~
. , Sheet 16 Gauge - ASTM 527 (1) Standard Specification for 38,000 (4) 52,000 (4)
Lighter Steel sheet, Zine Coated (Galvanized) Ly the Hot-Dip Process, Lock-Fcemino Quality 14 Gauge - ASTM 526 (1) Standard specification for 40,000 (4) 53,060 (4)
'{ Heavier Steel Sheet, "ine Coated (Galvanized) by the Hot-Dip Process, Commerical Quality A3TM A446 Standard Specification for 33,000 (2) 45,000 (2)
Grade A Steel Sheet, Zine Coated (Galvanized) by the Hot-Dip Process, Structural (Physical) Quality Grade B 37,000 (2) 52,000 (2) Grade C 40,000 (2) 55,000 (2) Grade D i 50,000 (2) 65,000 (2) Grade E 80,000 (2) 82,000 (2)
, Grade F 50,000 (2) 70,000 (2)
ASTM A742 Standard Specification for' 33,000 (2) 45,000 (2) __ Steel sheet, Zine Coated (Galvanized) by the Hot-Dip Process, Polymeric Pre-Coated For Sewer and Drainage Pioe ASTM A444 Standard Specification for 33,000 (2 )' 45,000 (2)
, j A Steel Sheet, Zine Coated 4 02 n (Galvanized) by the Hot-Dip
, Qyyg Proc 2ss for Culverts and g, a Underdrains n ASTM A528 Standard Specifz.ation for 34,000 (5) 52,000 (5) j,5
( , jg 4-Sheet Steel, Eine Coated (Galvanized) by the Hot-Dip Process, Drawino Quality
'M U *
(gt V ASTR'A642 Standard Specification for Sheet Steel, Zine Coated 34,000 (5) 52,000 (5) r" (Galvanized) by the Hot-Dip
- Process, trawine Quality,
/d' 4jp Special Killed gj AETN A361 Standard Specification for 38,000 (6) 52,000 (6) s Steel Sheet, Zine Coated
-g (Galverized) by the not-Dip ,
i Process for Roofine and Sidine ASTM 525 ( , Standard Specification for Steel Sheet, Zine Coated 38,000 (7), 52,000 (7) t ' (Galvanized) by the Hot-Dip Process, General Requirements 4 7 () Refers to note numbers. ee - < m oo < w m . -m-o m o o p - = -
1 - Page 2 af 2
- MATERIAL SPECTFTCATT*W AND TECHANICAL PROPERTTES (cInt.)
*FOR GALVANIZED SHEET STEEL AND STTFFENER HANCER, AND SUPPCPT STEEL' MECMANICAL PROPERTIES MATERIAL SIEE SPSC I ION E STRENGTN STRENGTHS
' PSI PSI '
. ,~
Stiffeners, 3*x3*xl/4" and ASTP A36 (1) Standard Specification for 36,000 (2) 58,000 (2 ) Hangers, Larger and Sopports Structural Steel 2* "x2-h"xh* ASIM 575 TtandardSdeificAtionfor 37,200 (3) 57,500 (3) and smaller Grade Merchant Cuality M t-Rolled (Formed Angle) M-1020 (1) c*- ;; ! Bars Grade , M ~34,000 (3) 52,000 (3) M-1008
- Grade - "
35,700 (3) 54,500 (3)
. s .
- M-1010 Grade 36,100 (3) 55,000 (3)
M-1015 ASTM A661 Standard Specification for 22,500 (2) 45,000 (2) Grade 45 Merchant Quality Hot-Rolled - Garbon Stect Bars f.ubject to -- Mechanical Property Grade 50 25,000 (2) 50,000 (2)
, Grade 55- 27,500 (2) 55,000 (2)
Grade 60 30,000 (2) 60,000 (2) Grade 65 32,500 (2) 65,000 (2) Grade 70 35,000 (2) 70,000 (2) Grade 75 37,500 (2) 75,000 (2) Grade 80 40,000 (2) 80,000 (2 ) () Refers to note numbers. e 4
- Noteen
- 1. Materials specified in J-2590.
- 2. Properties from appropriate ATT!! specification.
- 3. Properties obtained as minimum produced value from Northwestern Steel and Fire company.
4. Properties obtained as routine periodic testing for quality control from Inland Steel Company.
. 5. Material has a chemical compositior that to similar to ASTM A575. Grade 1008.
- 6. Material not chemically controlled, data estimated by Inland Steel Company.
- 7. Material has a chemical composition that is similar to ASTM $27.
= ,
MATESIAL SPECfrfCATT*H A D MECMANICAT PROPERTIES
*FOR FASTENERS USED IN HVAC SYCTEMC FASTE!:ER MATERIAL SIECIFICATION MINIMUM TENSILE MATERIAL SPECIFICATION TITLE C(RetENTS STR DCTH. PSI
. + , J.
9 .
. , , 3: ASTM A307 (1) Standard Specification for Carbon 60.000 (2) -
Steel Externally Threaded Standard Fastenere
~
. ASTM A325 Standard Specification for High- 120.000 (2)
~
, Strenath Solte for Structural 5 Steel Jointe
't. ')
ASDt A354 Stenderd Specification for 125.000 (2) .
. Quenched and Tempered Alloy Steel Sales. Stude and other Eaternally Threaded Fasteners , . ASVt A449 Standard Specification for 120.000 (2)
Quenched and Tepered Steel Bolte and studs ASDI A490 Standard Specification for 150.000 (2) Quenched and Tempered A11ov Steel Bolte f or structura t Steel Joints ANSI 518.2.1 American National Standard 60.000 (3) Refers to ASTM A307 Square end Hex Bolts and Screws Inc1k Series s :. m
- A 4 A[ ASTM A563 Standard Specification for Carbon .nd Alloy Steel Nute 52.000 (2) Proof Strese. PSI .
ASTM A194 Standard Specirleation for 120.000 (2) Proof Stress. PSI g) Carbon and Alloy Steet Nuts S k for Bolte for Mith-Pressure and Muh-Temperature Service *
- ANSI B15.2.2 American National Standard 52.000 (3) Refere to ASTM A563 g $ Seuare and Hex Nuts P
- gS Rivetet AST:1 A132 (1) Standard Specification for Discontinued
- Wrought-Iron Rivete and Rivet Rounds
** MIL-R-24243 Military Specification. , Mielmus Tensile 3/16" diameter rivets General Specification for ' land-475 lbe (2)
Rivate. Blind; Non-Structural Retained Mandrei Screws: ASTM AS48 Standard Specification for Y g Steel Wire. Carbon. Cold-
.-h*
/ *'
Ileading Quality, for Tabbing or Sheetseral Screws
, We eher e r- ASTM F436 Standard Specification for 38-45 ERC (2) (MRC) Bardnese Rockwell C
, Hardened Steel Washere ANSI 527.1
,. (ANSI 318.21.1) American National Standard 4$-51 BRC (2) Redesignated as ANSI C18.21.1 teck Washers 1972 A351 E27.2 American Standard Plain Washer 23-35 lRC (3) Redesignated as ANSI B18.22.1
- 4.
, (ANSI B18.22.1)
- 1965 (R1975) Refer to ASTM l A325 t Studs: ASDt A193 Standard Specification for 75.000 (2) Clase 1 Alloy Steel and Stainlese 110.000 (2) Class 2 Steel Boltina Naterlate for High *emperature Service ASTM A354 Standard Specification for 125.000 (2) -
Quenched and Tempered Alloy Steel Bolts. 3ruo= and other D r. rna t iv Threaded Eweenere.. A0TM A441 Standard Sper.ification for 70.000 (2) 3/4" diameter and under rfr5-strenth Low Alloy irructuras m ng.anese W.n.edium $ teel Notest
\
- 1. M.ateriale specified in J-2590.
- 2. Properttee trom evbject m.ateri.nl av ecification, \g
- 3. Properties f rom ref erenced AS*1 opsetitution.
/- .
x .
\
s
\s '
HVAC MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT FURNISHED BY THE ZACK COMPANY FOR THE LASALLE CCUNTY NUCLEAR CENERATING STATION Material / Equipment Categories e Fasteners
- Miscellaneous Steel Products
- Sealants and Gaskets ,
- Ductwork, Stiffeners, Hangers
- Weld Rod Filler Material
.
- Ductwork Accessories
*. Coatings / Paints -
- Refrigeration Equipment
. Purchased Equipment.
e General Notes 4 Page 1 of 15 6 g-, _ _ ,
f , *$ .
~
Nc HVAC MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT FURNISHED sW M. i *, BY Tile ZACK COMPANY FOR Tile ' ' LAS LE COUNTY NUCLEAR CENERATING STATION W Page 7 of 15 Safety-Related , (SR) or Non- Quality , Material / Specified Furnishbd Safety-Related Comunercial (C) Equipment Materials / Materials / (NSR) ' Or Documents Available Designation Equipment Equipment (See Note 1) Special (S) (Ohlective Evidence) FM.TENE'IS o Bolts ASTM A307 ASTM A307~
~
SR C Field Test Data gM ANSI B18.2.1 N d"
]y a o Nuts None specified ASTM A194, A563 SR C Field Test Data ASW A307 re-ferences ASTM ANSI B18.2.2 L A563 1-o Iluck Fasteners None specified MIL-P-24369B SR C Reliable Supplier-o Rivets ASTM A152 IFI-110, 114 SR C See Note 7 .
! MIL-R'-24243 . - o Screws ASTM AS48 ANSI B16.6.4 SR C See Note 8
~
IFI-ll3 o Plain Washers None specified ASTM F436 . SR C See Note 9 ANSI B27.2' . 4 - - o Concrete Expan- Phillips " Red Phillips." Red SR b Reliable Supplier sion Anchors Head" et al. Ilead", IIILTI ' o Structural Bolts ASTM A325 ASTM A325, A354, ' SR S Visual Inspection A449,'A490
o
\
E NVAC MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT FURNISliED
,,,,,,' BY Tile ZACK COMPANY FOR Tile' -
- LASALLE COUKfY NUCLEAR CENERATING STATION Page 3 of 15 -
3 Safety-Related
- l; (SR) or Non- Quality , ,
j Material / Specified Furnished Safety-Related Commercial (C) . Equipment Materials / Materials / (NSR) Or . Documents Available Designation Equipment Equipment (See Note 1) Special (S) (Objective Evidence) o Captive Screw None specified ASTM A307 NSR C Not applicable Assemblies o Lock Washers None specified ANSI B27.1' SR C See Note 9 o Beveled Washers None specified hNSIB27.4 SR C See Note 9 . o Lock Nuts None specified IFI-100, 101, SR C See Note 10 107 o Studs None specified ASTM A193,~A354 I SR C Visual Inspection A449 o Drive Nails None specified CSA NSR C Not Applicable FF-S-325 '
#3.2.5.2 '
e
\i a
O e o
4 4 HVAC MATERIALS AND EQdIPMF.NT FURNISHED .
* ~
, , , , , , , BY THE ZACK COMPANY FOR THE - - -
LASALLE' COUNTY NUCLEAR'CENERATING STATION < Page 4 of 15 , Safety-Related [ (SR) or Non. Quality
- Material / Specified Furnished Safety-Related Commercial (C)
. Equipment Materisis/ Materials / (NSR) Or Documents Available Designation Equipment I Equipment (See Note 1) Special (S) (Objective Evidence) MISCELLANEOUS STEEL PRODUCTS
- e Tie Rods , 1/2"$ Calvanized Republic Elecre- SR C Reliable Supplier Tubing unite E.H.T.
WW-C-563-A o Band Steel None specified ASTM A36 SR C Field Test Data o Bar Stock None specified ASTM.A36 SR g C Field Test Data o Shims ASTM A36 - ASTM A36 SR C Reliable Supplier o Cusset Plates ASTM A36 ASTM A36 SR C Field Test Data o Expansion ASTM A36 ASTM A36 SR C Field Test Data Anchor Plates o llanger Clip ASTM A526' ASTM A526 SR C Reliable Supplier Strips e Threaded Rod None specified ASTM A307, A193 NSR C Not Applicable o Wire Cloth ;ione specified RRW-360A NSR C Not Applicable e Channel None specified ASTM A36 SR C Field Test Data e Tube Steci None specified ASTM A500. A501 SR C Field Test Data
. t
I INAC MATERIALS AND EQUIP)fENT FilRNISilED
, ,, ,, , , , BY TIIE ZACK COMPANY FOR Tile , ,
LASALLE COUNTY NUCLEAR CENERATING ST/.TTON N Page 5 of 15 Safety-Related Quality , * (SR) or Non- ~ Mate ial/ Specified Furnished Safety ,Related Commercial (C) Equipment Materials / Materials / (NSR) Or Documents Available . Designation Equipment Equipment (See Note 1)- Special (S) (Objective Evidence) , o Structural Beams ASnf A-36 ASTM A36 St C Field Test Data Used as Auxi-liary Steel n
\ .
\
/
.er *
/
/ /
/
a 0
- l-il .
m a
r i. HVAC MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT FURNISHED
. , , , , , . .RY THE ZACK COMPANY FOR THE - '
l LASALLE COUNTY NUCLEAR CENERATINC STATION I Page 6 of 15 Safety-Related (SR) or Non- Quality
- Material / Specified Furnished Sa fe ty-Rela t.ed Conunercial (C)
Equipment Materials / Materials / (NSR) Or Documents Available Designation Equipment Equipraent (See Note 1) Special (S) (Objective Evidence) SEALANTS AND ' CASKETS , e Duct Sealant CE SCS #1200 CE SCS #1200 SR C Reliable Supplier t DOW #732 RTV DOW #732-BL11 et al. JM "DUXSEAL" / i e Extert'al Sealant !!one specified Har'dcast FT-20 SR C ReliableSupp1ker. . Standard Tape (DT) ; e Gaskcca Weatherban #1202 Weatherban #1202T SR C Reliable Supplier
~
b St
1 IIVAC' MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT FURNISHED / l , n , , , , ~BY THE ZACK COMPANY FOR THE , . LASALLE COUNTY NUCLEAR CENERATING STATION / Pag' 7 of 1 Safety-Related i ' * (SR) or Non- -Quality- ,
~
Material / Specified Furnished Safety-Related Comunercial (C) Equipment Materials / Materials / (NSR) Or Documents Available Designation Equipment Equipment (See Note 1) Special (S) (Objective Evidence) DUCTk'ORK STIFFEN- - ERS IIANGERS __. t , o Calvanized Duct- ASTM A526. A527 ASTM A526, A527 SR C Field Test Data work o Stainless Steel Type 316 Type'316 NSR ' C Not Applicable , Ductwork o Stiffeners ASTM A575 ASTM A36 SR C Field Test Data Grade M1020 ASTM A575 Grade 1020-Grade 1015 Crad.e 1010 O o 11 angers ASIN A36 ASTM A36 SR C Field Test Data - e 49 4 e e O 1
- 6 e
O
~
IIVAC MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT FURNISHED BY Tile ZACK COMPANY FOR THE , .. LASALLE COUNTY NIICLEAR CENERATING STATION Pane 8 of 15 Safety-Related (SR) or Non- Quality
- Material / Specified Furnished Safety-Related Comunercial (C)
Equipment Materials / Materials / (NSR) Or Documents Available i Designation Equipment Equ'ipment (See Nqre 1) Special (S) (Objective Evidence) WELD ROD FILLER
- MATERIAL '
o Welding Ductwork, Per Welding AWS E60-11 SR S Field Test Data
- Stiffeners, Procedures AWS E70-18 See Note 11 Supports AWS E70S o Ductwork Brazing Per Weldin8 RCU-SiA -SR 8 Field Test Data Procedures See Note 11 o Copper Pipe and
- AWS 5.8 AWS 5.8. SR S Reliable Supplier Fittings bag-1 bag-1 l i
e 4
\, ,
W O 1
HVAC NATERIALS AND EQdIPMENT FIIRNISHED
. , , , , , , BY THE ZACK COMPANY FOR THE <
- LASALLE COUNTY NUCLEAR CENERATING STATION Page 9 of 15 ,
' Safety-Related * . (SR) or Non- Quality, , Material / Specified Furnished Sa fe ty-Related Commercial (C) Equipment Materials / Materials / (NSR) Or Documents Available Designation Equipment Equipment (See Note 1) Special (S) (Objective Evidence) DUCTWORK , ACCESSORTES o Vancs ASTM A526, A527 ASTM A526, A527 SR C Reliable Supplier o Flexible Con- Ventglas, et al. Ventglas SR C Reliable Supplier nection (<50 HP, 2500 FPM) o Flexible Con- Goodyear Goodyear SR l C Reliable Supplier
; nection (>50 HP, E-59241-0348 E-59241-0348 1
2500 FPM) o Factory Insula- Wiremold 57K, Porter NSR C Not Applicable - ted Ducts et al. j o Flexible Metal Flexaust Co. Flexaust Co. NSR C- Not Applicable Ducts Bendway, et al. Bendway o Access Doors Air Balance Air Balance, SR C See Note 12 et al. Zack o Insulation Certain-Teed Certain-Teed NSR C Not Applicable Read ' Read
,l
I :i I 4
.\ i HVAC MATERIALS AND EQllIPMENT FilRNISilED BY THE ZACK COMPANY FOR Ti!E , . -
LASALLE COIINTY NUCLEAR CENF. RATING STATION , t Page 10 of 15 Safety-Related (SR) or Non- Quality ~ Material / Specified Furnished Safety-Related Conunercial (C) . Equipment Materials / Materials / (NSR) Or Documents Available Designation Equipment Equipment (See Note 1) Special (S) (Objective Evidence) - COATINGS / PAINTS o Calvanized Calvano'x 'Calvanox, .NSR C Not Applicable
. Touch-up Type I by Subox ZRC I
e 9 8 g 99 % 0
.O s
- HVAC MATERIALS AND EQUIPffENT FilRNTSIIED g , , , , BY'THE ZACK COMPANY FOR Tile , .
LASALLE COUNTY NUCLEAR CENERATTNC STATION Pate 11 of 15 Safety-Related (SR) or Non- Quality
- Material / Specified Furnished Safety-Related Conumercial (C)
~
Equipment Mar-rials / -Haterials/ (NSR) Or Documents Available Designation Equi went Equipment (See Note 1) Special (S) (Objective Evidence) REFRICERATION EQUIP!!ENT o Piping ASTM B8'8 ASTM B88 SR C See Note 13 Type K liard Type K .llard . o Specialties llenry, llenry, SR C Reliable Supplier Superior * ' Superior, et al. o Fittings ANSI B16.22 SR C See Note 13 o Expansion Valves ALCG, Sporlan Sporlan SR C Reliable Supplier o Liquid Solenoids ALCO, Sporlan Spor,lan SR C Reliable Supplier
~
o llot Cas Bypass ALCO Flo-Con SR C Reliable Supplier Valves o Insulation Armstrong, Armstrong. NSR C Not Applicable et al. , o Refrigerant, R22 R22 SR C See Note,,14, t e o e S u l 1 -
HVACMATERIALSANDEdUIPMENTFURNISHED y , , , , , BY IllE ZACK COMPANY FOR Tile - ' LASALLE COUNTY NUCLEAR CENERATING STATION' Pane 12 of 15 Safety-Related (SR) or Non- Quality ', , Material / Specified Furnished Safety-Related Commercial (C) ' Equipment Materials / . Materials / (NSR) Or Documents Available Designation Equipment Equipment (See Note 1) Special (S) (Objective Evidence) PURCilASED - EQUIPMENT o Fire Dampers , Advanced Air, Advanced Air, 154 SR Reliable Supplier et al. Ru s'r.in C 207 NSR e Gravity Shutters Performance American 23 SR Reliable Supplier . C Specification Warming 138 NSR e Balancing Performance American. 53 Sp Dampers Specification Warming C Reliable Supplier 347 NSR e Crilles, Regis- Titus, et al. Titus 252 SR ters, Diffusers 1347 NSR C Reliable Supplier
- e Airflow Hea- Air Monitor, Air Monitor 50 SR suring Stations et al. 168 NSR C Reliable Supplier e Silencers IAC, et al. IAC 23 SR C .
Reliable Suppiter 52 NSR l' l e Terminal Control Titus, et al. Titus 7D NSR C Not Applicable l Units e Dust Collector AAF AAF 1 NSR C Not Applicable - e Filters Farr, et al. Farr 11 SR 28 NSR C Reliable Suppiter i L. . 4,- 1
- \;
~
HVAC MATERIALS AND EQUIP)fENT FURNISHED
; , , , , , BY Tile ZACK COMPANY FOR Tile < '
\ LASALLE COUNTY NUCLEAR CENERATINC STATICN Paec 13 of 15 ,
. Safety-Related (SR) or Non- Quality
- Material / Specified Furnished Safety-Related Commercial (C)
Equipment Materials / Materials / (NSR) Or Locuments Available Designation Equipment Equipment (See Note 1) Special (S) (Objective Evidence)
- 'o' llumid if ica tion Armstrong Armstrong 1 NSR C Not Applicable Steam Generator o llumidifiers Armstrong Armstrong 20 NSR C Not Applicable
. o Miscellaneous Greenheck, et al. Greenheck, et al. 43 NSR C Not Applicable .
Fans o Electric lleating Bransh Bransh 2 NSR C Not Applicable Coils I o Packaged Air Trane, et al. Trane 6 NSR C Not Applicable
- Conditioning .
Units o Air llandling Carrier Carrier 1 NSR C Not Applicable Unit o Condensing Unit Carrier Carrier 3 NSR C Not Applicable . o Water-Cooled Carrier Carrier. I NSR C Not Applicable Condensing U. nits .. - o D-X Cooling Coils Carrier Carrier 2 NSR C Not Applicable f
- l .
. /- .
HVAC MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT WRNISHED
~
s 8Y THE ZACK COMPANY FOR THE s
\ LASALLE COUNTY NUCLEAR CENERATING STATION [-
General Notes
- 1. Under safety classification, listing of an item as SR or NSR represents use in safety-related or non-safety-related HVAC systems. For purchased -
equipment, numerical representations are quantities of equipment in their respective safety category.
- 2. Where materials were provided by Zack, even though they were not specified, they. represent normal commercial practice of providing all necessary hardware required for successful execution of the project. For those miscellaneous materials, not covered in the specification, Zack Company I did submit correspondence covering these materials for review.
- 3. Reliable Supplier - Manuf acturer has been produc'ing this standard item for many years. Operational history of this standard item indicates that its significant characteristics perforn estisfactorily.
- 4. Field Test Data.- Actual physical . data has been verified by in situ material testing.
5.. Visual Inspection - Materials can be readily identified by visual observation of a known physical characteristic. -
- 6. "Not Applicable - Items were used in non-safety-related HVAC systems and
~
therefore objective evidence is not required.
- 7. . Rivets .in safety-related sys.tems were used in .the attachment of the hanger
~
support clips.- The use of rivets for the application was . bared on test results utilizing commercially available rivets (" Pop Rivets"). The strength of the rivet is a function of the rivet diameter. Therefore, it is sufficient to perform a visual inspection to determine rivet diameter.
- 8. Screws in safety-related systems were used in the attachment of grilles, registers and diffuers (GRD) to the HVAC ductwork system. These CRD's are the end points of the HVAC systes and are provided to introduce air into a space to obtain a desired indoor environment. The individual i spaces are provided with a number of GRD's. The screws that were used are
; commercial grade sheet metal screws. No further objective evidence is
! warranted.
Page 14 of 15
.-- y -
i 4
, EVAC MATERIA 1.5 AND EQUIPMENT FURNISHED
. i BY THE ZACK COMPANY FOR THE !
LASALI.E COUNTY NUCLEAR CENERATING STATION General Notes I
- 9. Washers used in safety-related NVAC systems can be categorized as plain, bevel and lock type. Plain washers are used primarily to minimize j embedding and to aid in torquing the nut / bolt assembly. Bevel washers
! are normally provided with concrete expansion anchors and are used to i aid in torquing the expansion anchor assembly. Locn washers are used to provide greater bolt tension por unit of applied torque or to provide protection against looseness resulting from vibration. The ; washers that were used are commercial grade devices with no special a requirements dictated by their application. No further objective " evidence is warranted. . . 10. Lock nuts in safety-related systems were used in lieu of a bolt and lock washer connection. These lock nuc~s are commercial grade devices j with no special seguirements dictated by their application. No further
~~
objective evidence is warranted. . ,
, 11. Welding rods are used in the attachment of stiffener angles to the
.ductwork, the assembly of the supporting system or the longitudinal welding of 16 gauge and heavier ductwork. They were controlled by a
- weld rod quality control procedure. The welding applications were i
oontrolled by specific welding quality control procedures. Assurance has been maintained that the proper welding rod was used for the
, , appropriate fabrication: assembly. No further. objective evidence is warranted. -
12., Access doors have been provided in safety-related ductwork to aid in maintenance and inspection of duct mounted accessories such as dampers ! and airflow measuring stations. These devices are mounted in the ductwork system and are provided with latching mechanisms to maintain l closure. These devices have been procured from reliable suppliers or have been fabricated by Zack. They are constructed of the same materials as the ductwork for which they were installed. The use of these doors poses r.o safety concern. No further objective evidence , l l is warranted. 13.? Refrigerant piping and fittings have been subject to precsure tests in t excess of system design pressures during construction testing of system.
' No further objective evidence is warranted.
I r
- 14. Refrigersnt used within the safety-related air conditioning systems was confirmed by resulting temperature conditions identified during pre-operational testing of the respective system. The use of other refrigerants would have resulted in temperature extremes outside of - '
i the actual tested values. No further objective evidence is warranted. Page 15 of 15
, . . , .-. , e .,.,.._,,,.g M.,.... ._ .--
~
_ ,y r - L e The 10CRF50.55e submitted by The .Zack Company (Zack) was dispositioned - ; as follows: -
- 1) ThoseZackNCR's.whichappearedtobealbetob}er6 solved by Zack were returned to Zack for further review. .f -
- 2) Those which Zack could not resolve were included in .
Commonwealth Edison Company (CECO) NCR's 556, 557, 558, 566 and 594 and were submitted to CECO Engineering and subsequently to our consulting eng'ineer (S&L) for their recommended corrective action. The Zack NCR's can be categorized as follows:
- Material specifications for angles, shapes, plates and fasteners are diffeant than those identified in the project specification.
- Documentation provided for angles, shapes, sheets, coils and welding rod filter material is incomplete.
- Materials provided were used in non-safety related applications.-
!
- Miscellaneous discrepancies.
t In the course of reviewing these NCR's the following was considered prior to final disposition: ( 1
- Material specifications that differed from those identified in the project specificat' ion were re-I
' viewed to establish the chemical and/or mechanical property variances. (
- Documentation Ehat' Gas deemed incomplete was reviewed to determine if sufficient information was provided
.. - . ._ y
i
^
- s .
.t Pega 2-
,f** ,.
to establish the material specification. This was done by reviewing other evidence, such as
. purchase orders and documentation, provided by
~
Zack. , ,
- Materials were reviewed to determine their api.lica- ,
bility to safety-related systems by identifing ' materialuniqueto[non-safety-related sys.tems, Zack provided documentation and discussions with construction engineers. - once all technical information relating to the NCR has been reviewed,the resolved NCR is dispositioned in accordance with established procedures. ,, l t . . . l I 9 m.m e .=-en= es.ee e , m
s . . .
}
. 1 A /10 l
. . SPECIFIC GAP ALLEGATIONS MADE REGARDING N N THE ZACK COMPANY x
- 1. Absence of any fonnal Quality Assurance Documentation Program
- 2. Inadequate qualificat' ions of personnel perfonning significant roles
- 3. Missing documentation and discrepancies in welder qualifications records
- 4. Inadequate training for QA personnel
- 5. Missing . records due to in&dequate' document control i
- 6. Absence of required quality verification on documents that could be retrieved
- 7. Lack of proper, identification through complianch with' material tracea-bility requirements
- 8. Improper alteration of QA records through stickers containing signatures of questionable authenticity
- 9. Improper alteration of QA records through whiting-out previous information in order to create the appearance of compliance with legal requirements
- 10. Improper reques'ts by Zack management for vendors to supply unavail-able infonnation or to inaccurately upgrade quality documentation
- 11. Failure to distinguish between consnercial and nuclear purchases on Purchase Orders
- 12. Unqualified vendors on the AVL
- 53. Failure to ' remove unqu'alified vendors 'from thE AVL
- 14. Management awareness of QA breakdown ,
- 15. Harassment, attempted intimidation and retaliation against QA staff Bad fa'ith progress reports to the utilities
~
16.
- 17. Failure to adequately discipline those responsible for records falsification
- 18. Surrender to unrealistic utility de'adlines
- 19. Utility knowledge of the QA breakdown
- 20. Utility complicity with the ongoing breakdown
- 21. Utility complicity with retaliation
- 22. Inaccurate public denlais by. utilities of the Zack deficiencies 9
A Iz/ 7M .- .dp,As
& v8 J 0wm..b.i
.~
/$har ,
Ocav 72?< u?u sy A .s N g u, & A . ~ da 6%,;;f,
/ /rrz.e,azX'ti k .A.au -n
. nod. w.uahi & Je. [jh b. d e. g
& ~ a .-
YAya xls f..eaw Ac . chipcfY~T
<.a : /
.m a du.4 6 ,a & J , girce b!
mw - J . g d -7 x 2 w . a 0 . s > L E Y< e /c
. A c..au s 4 V cJ A- w d xc</ +al Z h n . / c y.e _.d Aj ,, n euccl / 6 8.
AJ.Aets,u;,wJ cdaG AX/w >&su.
/2 h 2: &w,a%.c . 74,Tpc paau o w odan,o D 6. X B<aaseS up et zi 6,,.,,
/ , A O.<nua~ C4n.D} 6u,, 4f rc 4 //.D
/Ap<D.a& A x./aE n a A y. /6 fJa ,W:6. Janu a ,ce >u s <-r4de /
o} cads /dar.,n. f.d' cLD su 2h<[:s.>fh<w. Aw A.a e /cu~ aM x;m sf;cdc - a Za s A o.dna c.a.;ce oa J . Ad /un.cAA&X7:uffJMc;p diA
/ 66dNd c/w ztswJAdc4u a.d
/
7kle+dJA n..oun. ;
? $u
. lhp 'e 84eE-l802%
l
. e AJ G .p' //s .. .. _.
) anu& w/?cef.c< w k.a).)-xc6 m,Sn ,&J e4.oc6?sJ sd.s aw '
6, .s%. 6 6 s a x c- a _ T w/ - g s kan G. X >Guu w dso k .>&d2 n .,A nnu 96,x.) <aasdt> J.Au<.u ,c u->: > 2,,au,,5./L J Ata o /k<0 Z.a~26 e.h ;<2'c ,,- Aes-.O ni 2%/.x7 .cgo' pu/- .X1d-e. cf. 2
.cus <c .
2 Q Yex 0 :am.o l ,6ft- <e'2L-aaf~'
- 0. -)2' V)<awtu.wefr .rtw . c a +k ZTAe m M .,c *, e b ?<><.s n.,ZU., Ar '
.<. ll4t)
.a. k a A z d m . s ; db. x s A y u a w
.mwdc dalb sx .? Wf" 6bc.
,.cJu<0.Aa-cM' <.> ,cee
/ca. da+1 J u. -
;&fl ,
p.w6c.,,6c. el-0.'a . fy* ,CCw .a $ay:e0 YP&zZEk.0 ' dSp < 2 f M c. A z y c. .. up? s.<vt 4&.o >a <Ga ra01 es.u ufs< f a U ic.4zr_c e6>cc cw je.X'h. O l'. ZAD f/ . fALc.t% L 4< t C .? 6ttvu a. nun >ca .2% .,Cl<_ &lL. c? . a. e 0 . J >- > da D T 7?? n A u< u c.C sic [ V & /0 8. J a.kaJ.,%c eum <./-f x4-suum . ,x d - k o 8/a:c w A ~_ Cr{t. w,a.ad<2 , n oud %Ce. - pa a .n2.npre .xsA. st.zcan & _.-h s w -z2 ao~
/ u f<
.- -D ,,
4 ~
. cit <,. y%~u f
Yg An WY Au A 9/ z s ..a y +: p - 2 y A ,: d; s.
- sa . u , ,
a ~. os.
~
.xe-42.~Los, c.eu.
a 4 &<.k J o . p/ spa. ; . 69 Aa,n4.s ,a ,..o _ ua l w A w's u - v) .da,o JL.a mi=- sw ca.&aD .;zn/
.wbuf0 & ccLl .65]at.< -c ks. ..ZWu M.>Az& aLttt% gy g w, M u~
;cth. M A ~ w d. '
V I W.zb&- x v fL . : Aim
>a.uAh QaG> > h -a A A > ,o d e xzu A exc= & M c . % 6 - >. A x..:. m
.;%.dyLcuafM+ n an'< .W
- a au. w u y - m e,
; w d s g dz A zs n . s,.4 AwuAAg n s VJQ h<kcs y , a x1w.. d- fa~
ouAs a.nu H A p a % a.d 4 ALn A cd.>Aat /%J. A.w- Asaop,J~D i dF.c %AD.Auc .
- A ..azTn, M-ww ~O. I CAc - -t; / xt t A6c. e .
Q$at, a ?D a.1/
# m' ,e-DoddJ 4 p~f<)/+u x
~ At a6,
~
y .
.%d-ciw,_/ja
~~ '
j e. w ,2h.u/4
. .}}