Comments on Proposed Rev 3 to Reg Guide 1.9, Selection, Design,Qualification,Testing & Reliability of Diesel Generator Units Used as Onsite Electric Power Sys at Nuclear Power Plants. Reg Guide Does Not Provide FlexibilityML20236B464 |
Person / Time |
---|
Site: |
Millstone, Haddam Neck, 05000000 |
---|
Issue date: |
03/08/1989 |
---|
From: |
Mroczka E CONNECTICUT YANKEE ATOMIC POWER CO., NORTHEAST NUCLEAR ENERGY CO., NORTHEAST UTILITIES |
---|
To: |
Meyer D NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION & RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (ARM) |
---|
References |
---|
FRN-53FR45831, FRN-57FR14514, REF-GTECI-B-56, REF-GTECI-EL, RTR-REGGD-01.009, RTR-REGGD-1.009, TASK-B-56, TASK-OR 53FR45831-00008, 53FR45831-8, AE06-1-007, AE6-1-7, B13113, NUDOCS 8903210102 |
Download: ML20236B464 (8) |
|
|
---|
Category:LEGAL TRANSCRIPTS & ORDERS & PLEADINGS
MONTHYEARML20217N5481999-10-28028 October 1999 Memorandum & Order (Intervention Petition).* Petitioners May File Amend to Their Petition with Contentions by No Later than 991117.With Certificate of Svc.Served on 991028 ML20217N4821999-10-26026 October 1999 NRC Staff Response to Petition to Intervene Filed by Connecticut Coalition Against Millstone & Long Island Coalition Against Millstone.* Licensing Board Should Deny Petition.With Certificate of Svc ML20217H9511999-10-21021 October 1999 Memorandum & Order.* Proceeding Re Nepco 990315 Application Seeking Commission Approval of Indirect License Transfers Consolidated,Petitioners Granted Standing & Two Issues Admitted.With Certificate of Svc.Served on 991021 ML20217N2561999-10-21021 October 1999 Transcript of Affirmation Session on 990121 in Rockville, Maryland Re Memorandum & Order Responding to Petitions to Intervene Filed by co-owners of Seabrook Station Unit 1 & Millstone Station Unit Three.Pp 1-3 ML20217N6651999-10-21021 October 1999 Northeast Nuclear Energy Co Answer to Request for Hearing & Petition to Intervine.* Petition Should Be Denied,For Listed Reasons.With Certificate of Svc ML20217E9031999-10-19019 October 1999 Establishment of Atomic Safety & Licensing Board.* Board Being Established to Preside Over Northeast Nuclear Energy Co,For Hearing Submitted by Listed Groups.With Certificate of Svc ML20217F0431999-10-14014 October 1999 Declaration of DA Lochbaum,Nuclear Safety Engineer,Union of Concerned Scientists,Concerning Technical Issues & Safety Matters Involved in Millstone Nuclear Power Station,Unit 3 License Amend for Sf Storage.* with Certificate of Svc ML20217G9631999-10-14014 October 1999 Exemption from Requirements of 10CFR50,App E,Section IV.F.2.c Re Conduct of full-participation Exercise in Sept 1999 B17891, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Use of Requirements Cited in 10CFR50.55a Concerning ASME References with Respect to Edition & Addenda of ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code1999-10-0606 October 1999 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Use of Requirements Cited in 10CFR50.55a Concerning ASME References with Respect to Edition & Addenda of ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code ML20217F0231999-10-0606 October 1999 Petition to Intervene.* Petitioners Request to Be Permitted to Intervene in Listed Proceedings B17889, Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 72 Re Reporting Requirements for Nuclear Power Reactors.Util Supports NEI Comments on Subj Rules1999-09-23023 September 1999 Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 72 Re Reporting Requirements for Nuclear Power Reactors.Util Supports NEI Comments on Subj Rules ML20211P5541999-09-13013 September 1999 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Consideration of Potassium Iodide in Emergency Planning ML20216F3801999-09-12012 September 1999 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Consideration of Potassium Iodide in Emergency Plans.Urges That Emergency Planning Regulation Be Amended to Require Availability of Potassium Iodide for Public in Event of Nuclear Accidents ML20216F3821999-09-12012 September 1999 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Consideration of Potassium Iodide in Emergency Plans.Urges That Emergency Planning Regulation Be Amended to Require Availability of Potassium Iodide for Public in Event of Nuclear Accidents ML20216F3901999-09-12012 September 1999 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Consideration of Potassium Iodide in Emergency Plans.Urges That Emergency Planning Regulation Be Amended to Require Availability of Potassium Iodide for Public in Event of Nuclear Accident ML20216F4461999-09-12012 September 1999 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Consideration of Potassium Iodide in Emergency Plans.Urges That Emergency Planning Regulation Be Amended to Require Availability of Potassium Iodide for Public in Event of Nuclear Accident ML20216F5891999-09-12012 September 1999 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Consideration of Potassium Iodide in Emergency Plans ML20216F5921999-09-12012 September 1999 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Consideration of Potassium Iodide in Emergency Plans ML20212A1171999-09-12012 September 1999 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Use of Potassium Iodide for Emergencies at Npps.Urges That EP Regulation Be Amended to Require Availability of Potassium Iodide for Public in Event of Nuclear Accidents ML20212A1511999-09-12012 September 1999 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Consideration of Potassium Iodide in Eps.Urges That EP Regulation Be Amended to Require Availability of Postassium Iodide for Public in Event of Nuclear Accidents ML20212A1381999-09-12012 September 1999 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Use of Potassium Iodide for Emergencies at Npps.Urges That EP Regulation Be Amended to Require Availability of Potassium Iodide for Public in Event of Nuclear Accident ML20212A1601999-09-12012 September 1999 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Consideration of Potassium Iodide in Eps.Urges That EP Regulation Be Amended to Require Availability of Potassium Iodide for Public in Event of Nuclear Accident ML20212B9581999-09-12012 September 1999 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Consideration of Potassium Iodide in Emergency Plans.Urges That Emergency Planning Regulation Be Amended to Require Availability of Potassium Iodide for Public in Event of Nuclear Accidents ML20212B9761999-09-12012 September 1999 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Consideration of Potassium Iodide in Emergency Plans.Urges That Emergency Planning Regulation Be Amended to Require Availability of Potassium Iodide for Public in Event of Nuclear Accidents ML20212G2341999-09-12012 September 1999 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Consideration of Potassium Iodide in Emergency Plans ML20212G2371999-09-12012 September 1999 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Consideration of Potassium Iodide in Emergency Plans ML20212G9711999-09-12012 September 1999 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Consideration of Ki in Emergency Plans ML20207H9131999-09-12012 September 1999 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Consideration of Potassium Iodide in Eps.Urges That EP Regulation Be Amended to Require Availability of Potassium Iodide for Public in Event of Nuclear Accident ML20212A1711999-09-11011 September 1999 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Use of Potassium Iodide for Emergencies at Npps.Requests That Potassium Iodide Be Made Available in State of Connecticut ML20212A1781999-09-10010 September 1999 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Use of Potassium Iodide for Emergencies at Npps.Urges That Potassium Iodide Be Made Available in Connecticut for at Leas Min of Protection ML20210S5641999-08-13013 August 1999 Motion of Connecticut Light & Power Co,Western Massachusetts Electric Co & North Atlantic Energy Corp to Strike Unauthorized Response of Nepco.* Unauthorized Response Fails to Comply with Commission Policy.With Certificate of Svc ML20210P6271999-08-10010 August 1999 Response of New England Power Company.* Nu Allegations Unsupported by Any Facts & No Genuine Issues of Matl Facts in Dispute.Commission Should Approve Application Without Hearing ML20210S9671999-08-0606 August 1999 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Stockpiling of Ki.Pros & Cons of Stockpiling or Predistribution of Ki to Households Difficult to Assess & There Will Be two-year-trial Period in Connecticut to Address Practical Issues Involved ML20210H8311999-08-0303 August 1999 Reply of Connecticut Light & Power Co,Western Massachusetts Electric Co & North Atlantic Energy Corp to Response of New England Power Co to Requests for Hearing.* Petitioners Request Hearing on Stated Issues.With Certificate of Svc ML20210E3011999-07-27027 July 1999 Response of New England Power Co to Requests for Hearing. Intervenors Have Presented No Justification for Oral Hearing in This Proceeding.Commission Should Reject Intervenors Request for Oral Hearing & Approve Application ML20210A0311999-07-20020 July 1999 Motion of Clp & Wmec for Leave to Intervene & Petition for Hearing.* Requests Permission to Intervene in Proceeding & That Hearing Be Granted on Issues Presented.With Certificate of Svc & Notices of Appearances ML20195H1911999-06-15015 June 1999 Application of Montaup Electric Co & New England Power Co for Transfer of Licenses & Ownership Interests.Requests That Commission Consent to Two Indirect Transfers of Control & Direct Transfer CY-99-076, Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR1,2,4,7,9,15,16,76 & 110 Re Initiative to Implement New Document Mgt Sys That Would Permit Electronic Storage,Retrieval & on-line Ordering of Publicly Available NRC Official Records1999-05-20020 May 1999 Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR1,2,4,7,9,15,16,76 & 110 Re Initiative to Implement New Document Mgt Sys That Would Permit Electronic Storage,Retrieval & on-line Ordering of Publicly Available NRC Official Records ML20206U9341999-04-14014 April 1999 Petition Pursuant to 10CFR2.206 for Suspension of Operating License at Millstone Nuclear Power Station.Petitioners Request That NRC Conduct Hearing on Issues Raised in Submitted Petitions ML20205R8381999-04-14014 April 1999 Transcript of 990414 Public Briefing on Remaining Issues Re Proposed Restart of Millstone Unit 2.Pp 1-180 ML20204G7671999-03-23023 March 1999 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50.54(a) Re Direct Final Rule,Changes to QA Programs ML20205F9581999-03-16016 March 1999 Exemption from Requirements of 10CFR50,App R,Section Iii.J, to Extent That Requires Emergency Lighting with 8-hour Battery Supply for Access & Egress Routes to Safe Shutdown Equipment.Request Granted,Per 10CFR50.12(a)(2)(ii) ML20207K6391999-03-0101 March 1999 Transcript of 990301 Public Hearing in Riverhead Town Hall, Riverhead,Ny Re Proposed Restart of Millstone Unit 2 Commercial Nuclear Reactor.Pp 1-136.Supporting Documentation Encl ML20204B6631999-02-22022 February 1999 Comment on Recommended Improvements to Oversight Process for Nuclear Power Reactors.Forwards 5th Edition of Nuclear Lemons Assessment of America Worst Commerical Nuclear Power Plants ML20205D7761999-02-0909 February 1999 Transcript of 990209 Millstone Unit 1 Decommissioning Public Meeting in Waterford,Ct.Pp 1-89.Supporting Documentation Encl ML20199K2511999-01-19019 January 1999 Transcript of 990119 Meeting on Status of Third Party Oversight of Millstone Station Employee Concerns Program & Safety Conscious Work Environ in Rockville,Maryland.Pp 1-159.With Supporting Documentation ML20204F2261999-01-11011 January 1999 Transcript of Verbatim Proceedings on 990111 in Waterford, CT in Matter of Northeast Utils,Millstone Units 2 & 3 ML20195J4791998-11-19019 November 1998 Exemption from Certain Requirements of 10CFR50.54(w) & 10CFR140.11 Re Reduction in Amount of Insurance Required for Facility ML20195E2361998-11-16016 November 1998 Director'S Decision 98-12,granting Petitioner Request to Investigate Licensee Proposal to Air Cool SFP & Denying Request to Suspend Operating License of Plant ML20155J8631998-11-12012 November 1998 Memorandum & Order (Ruling on Contentions).* Contentions of Citizens Regulatory Commission Are Outside Scope of Instant Amend Proceeding for Listed Reasons.Petitioner Contentions Must Be Rejected.With Certificate of Svc.Served on 981112 1999-09-23
[Table view] Category:PUBLIC COMMENTS ON PROPOSED RULES & PETITIONS FOR
MONTHYEARB17891, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Use of Requirements Cited in 10CFR50.55a Concerning ASME References with Respect to Edition & Addenda of ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code1999-10-0606 October 1999 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Use of Requirements Cited in 10CFR50.55a Concerning ASME References with Respect to Edition & Addenda of ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code B17889, Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 72 Re Reporting Requirements for Nuclear Power Reactors.Util Supports NEI Comments on Subj Rules1999-09-23023 September 1999 Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 72 Re Reporting Requirements for Nuclear Power Reactors.Util Supports NEI Comments on Subj Rules ML20211P5541999-09-13013 September 1999 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Consideration of Potassium Iodide in Emergency Planning ML20207H9131999-09-12012 September 1999 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Consideration of Potassium Iodide in Eps.Urges That EP Regulation Be Amended to Require Availability of Potassium Iodide for Public in Event of Nuclear Accident ML20212G9711999-09-12012 September 1999 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Consideration of Ki in Emergency Plans ML20212G2371999-09-12012 September 1999 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Consideration of Potassium Iodide in Emergency Plans ML20212G2341999-09-12012 September 1999 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Consideration of Potassium Iodide in Emergency Plans ML20212B9761999-09-12012 September 1999 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Consideration of Potassium Iodide in Emergency Plans.Urges That Emergency Planning Regulation Be Amended to Require Availability of Potassium Iodide for Public in Event of Nuclear Accidents ML20212B9581999-09-12012 September 1999 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Consideration of Potassium Iodide in Emergency Plans.Urges That Emergency Planning Regulation Be Amended to Require Availability of Potassium Iodide for Public in Event of Nuclear Accidents ML20212A1601999-09-12012 September 1999 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Consideration of Potassium Iodide in Eps.Urges That EP Regulation Be Amended to Require Availability of Potassium Iodide for Public in Event of Nuclear Accident ML20212A1381999-09-12012 September 1999 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Use of Potassium Iodide for Emergencies at Npps.Urges That EP Regulation Be Amended to Require Availability of Potassium Iodide for Public in Event of Nuclear Accident ML20212A1511999-09-12012 September 1999 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Consideration of Potassium Iodide in Eps.Urges That EP Regulation Be Amended to Require Availability of Postassium Iodide for Public in Event of Nuclear Accidents ML20212A1171999-09-12012 September 1999 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Use of Potassium Iodide for Emergencies at Npps.Urges That EP Regulation Be Amended to Require Availability of Potassium Iodide for Public in Event of Nuclear Accidents ML20216F5921999-09-12012 September 1999 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Consideration of Potassium Iodide in Emergency Plans ML20216F5891999-09-12012 September 1999 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Consideration of Potassium Iodide in Emergency Plans ML20216F4461999-09-12012 September 1999 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Consideration of Potassium Iodide in Emergency Plans.Urges That Emergency Planning Regulation Be Amended to Require Availability of Potassium Iodide for Public in Event of Nuclear Accident ML20216F3901999-09-12012 September 1999 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Consideration of Potassium Iodide in Emergency Plans.Urges That Emergency Planning Regulation Be Amended to Require Availability of Potassium Iodide for Public in Event of Nuclear Accident ML20216F3821999-09-12012 September 1999 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Consideration of Potassium Iodide in Emergency Plans.Urges That Emergency Planning Regulation Be Amended to Require Availability of Potassium Iodide for Public in Event of Nuclear Accidents ML20216F3801999-09-12012 September 1999 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Consideration of Potassium Iodide in Emergency Plans.Urges That Emergency Planning Regulation Be Amended to Require Availability of Potassium Iodide for Public in Event of Nuclear Accidents ML20212A1711999-09-11011 September 1999 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Use of Potassium Iodide for Emergencies at Npps.Requests That Potassium Iodide Be Made Available in State of Connecticut ML20212A1781999-09-10010 September 1999 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Use of Potassium Iodide for Emergencies at Npps.Urges That Potassium Iodide Be Made Available in Connecticut for at Leas Min of Protection ML20210S9671999-08-0606 August 1999 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Stockpiling of Ki.Pros & Cons of Stockpiling or Predistribution of Ki to Households Difficult to Assess & There Will Be two-year-trial Period in Connecticut to Address Practical Issues Involved CY-99-076, Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR1,2,4,7,9,15,16,76 & 110 Re Initiative to Implement New Document Mgt Sys That Would Permit Electronic Storage,Retrieval & on-line Ordering of Publicly Available NRC Official Records1999-05-20020 May 1999 Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR1,2,4,7,9,15,16,76 & 110 Re Initiative to Implement New Document Mgt Sys That Would Permit Electronic Storage,Retrieval & on-line Ordering of Publicly Available NRC Official Records ML20204G7671999-03-23023 March 1999 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50.54(a) Re Direct Final Rule,Changes to QA Programs ML20204B6631999-02-22022 February 1999 Comment on Recommended Improvements to Oversight Process for Nuclear Power Reactors.Forwards 5th Edition of Nuclear Lemons Assessment of America Worst Commerical Nuclear Power Plants ML17265A8071998-10-0606 October 1998 Comment on Integrated Review of Assessment Process for Commercial Npps.Util Endorses Comments Being Provided by NEI on Behalf of Nuclear Industry B17475, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Reporting Requirements for Nuclear Power Reactors.Util Agrees with Extending non-emergency Prompt Notifications to Eight Hours, Which Would Help to Eliminate Unnecessary Repts1998-09-29029 September 1998 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Reporting Requirements for Nuclear Power Reactors.Util Agrees with Extending non-emergency Prompt Notifications to Eight Hours, Which Would Help to Eliminate Unnecessary Repts CY-98-139, Comment on Draft NUREG-1625, Proposed Standard TSs for Permanently Defueled Westinghouse Plants1998-09-0101 September 1998 Comment on Draft NUREG-1625, Proposed Standard TSs for Permanently Defueled Westinghouse Plants ML20216B5661998-03-31031 March 1998 Comment Supporting NRC Draft RG DG-1071, Std Format & Content for Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Rept ML20199A1631997-10-28028 October 1997 Forwards Final Page of Exhibit 2,P Gunter Ltr to Commission on Behalf of Nirs Re Prs 10CFR2,50 & 51 Involving Immediate Recission of Current Decommissioning Rules,Conducting Site Specific Health Study & EA &/Or EIS ML20199A1351997-10-24024 October 1997 Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR2,50 & 51 Re Immediate Rescission of Current Decommissioning Rules & Provision for Hearing on Decommissioning Plan for Plant.W/Nirs & Affidavits of M Resnikoff,S Mangiagli & R Bassilakis B16526, Comment on Proposed Suppl to NRC Bulletin 96-001 Re Control Rod Insertion Problems1997-06-18018 June 1997 Comment on Proposed Suppl to NRC Bulletin 96-001 Re Control Rod Insertion Problems ML20134P0681996-11-14014 November 1996 Comment on Draft RG DG-1051, Monitoring Effectiveness of Maint at Npp ML20134H0741996-11-0404 November 1996 Comments on Stakeholder Input for DSI-11, Strategic Assessment Issue Paper Response for Operating Reactor Program Oversight ML20059F7761994-01-0303 January 1994 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR73 Re Proposal to Amend Its Physical Protection Regulations for Operating Nuclear Power Reactors by Modifying Design Basis Threat for Radiological Sabotage B14644, Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR30,40,50,60,70 & 72 Re Whistleblower Protection for Nuclear Power Plant Employees.Supports Rules1993-10-14014 October 1993 Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR30,40,50,60,70 & 72 Re Whistleblower Protection for Nuclear Power Plant Employees.Supports Rules ML20056G4121993-08-31031 August 1993 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR2 Re Review of 2.206 Process B14346, Comment Supporting Draft RG DG-1020, Monitoring Effectiveness of Maint at Nuclear Power Plants1993-01-15015 January 1993 Comment Supporting Draft RG DG-1020, Monitoring Effectiveness of Maint at Nuclear Power Plants HL-2928, Comments on Review of Reactor Licensee Reporting Requirements.Util Agrees W/Numarc Comments1992-09-29029 September 1992 Comments on Review of Reactor Licensee Reporting Requirements.Util Agrees W/Numarc Comments ML20091Q8661992-01-31031 January 1992 Comment Opposing Draft NUREG-1022,Rev 1, Event Reporting Sys,10CFR50.72 & 50.73,Clarification of NRC Sys & Guidelines for Reporting B13722, Comments Supporting Proposed Rule Re SECY-90-347, Regulatory Impact Survey Rept1991-01-29029 January 1991 Comments Supporting Proposed Rule Re SECY-90-347, Regulatory Impact Survey Rept ML20059P0631990-10-15015 October 1990 Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR2,50 & 54 Re Nuclear Power Plant License Renewal.Endorses Comments Submitted by NUMARC B13567, Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR55 Re Operators Licenses Mod for fitness-for-duty.Endorses NUMARC Position That Rule Challenges Licensed Operators Trustworthiness W/O Justification & Would Affect Morale of Licensed Operators1990-07-0202 July 1990 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR55 Re Operators Licenses Mod for fitness-for-duty.Endorses NUMARC Position That Rule Challenges Licensed Operators Trustworthiness W/O Justification & Would Affect Morale of Licensed Operators B13572, Comment Opposing Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-55 Re Periodicity of Submissions of FSAR Revs1990-07-0202 July 1990 Comment Opposing Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-55 Re Periodicity of Submissions of FSAR Revs ML20011E4861990-02-0707 February 1990 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR71 Re Compatibility of Pu Air Transport Regulations W/Iaea Stds.Supports EEI-UWASTE/NUMARC Comments to Be Provided to NRC by 900209 B13367, Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR30,40,50,60,70,72 & 150 Re Preserving Free Flow of Info to Commission.Nrc Made Wise Choice to Not Impose Any Obligation on Private Parties to Include Affirmative Statement in Employment Agreements1989-09-20020 September 1989 Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR30,40,50,60,70,72 & 150 Re Preserving Free Flow of Info to Commission.Nrc Made Wise Choice to Not Impose Any Obligation on Private Parties to Include Affirmative Statement in Employment Agreements ML20245G0721989-08-0303 August 1989 Comment on Draft Reg Guide, Assuring Availability of Funds for Decommissioning Nuclear Reactors. Recommends That NRC Recommendation on Trust Agreement Wording Be Deleted or NRC Should Grandfather Existing Trusts Such as for Plants ML20248B6201989-08-0202 August 1989 Comments on Draft Reg Guide, Assuring Availability of Funds for Decommissioning Nuclear Reactors. NRC Should Permit Use of Potential Tax Refund as Source of Decommissioning Funds ELV-00674, Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50,72 & 170 Re Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel in NRC-Approved Storage Casks at Nuclear Power Reactor Sites. 10CFR72.6(c) Should Be Revised to Provide for Storage W/O ISFSI Requirement1989-07-0707 July 1989 Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50,72 & 170 Re Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel in NRC-Approved Storage Casks at Nuclear Power Reactor Sites. 10CFR72.6(c) Should Be Revised to Provide for Storage W/O ISFSI Requirement ELV-00679, Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Acceptance of Products Purchased for Use in Nuclear Power Plant Structures,Sys & Components. Agrees W/Numarc Comments Provided to NRC on 8906261989-07-0505 July 1989 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Acceptance of Products Purchased for Use in Nuclear Power Plant Structures,Sys & Components. Agrees W/Numarc Comments Provided to NRC on 890626 1999-09-23
[Table view] |
Text
. -
I k '
r '
'., a
. ;. i g.$p)W 4= lM :
'l.
NORTHEAST UTIlJTIES a.nor.i ouie.. . s.io.n sir i. s.riin. conn.ciicut L h ""
. , . J ,,,,
03)
March 8,-1989 Docket Nos. 50-213 50-245 50-336 sc 10-4R 813113 Re: Draft Regulatory Guide 1.9 RS 802-5 Mr. D. L. Meyer, Chief Regulatory Publications Branch f N k Office of Administration and } l j / k/ l Resources Management I i
U.S. Nuclehr Regulatory Commission '
Washington, DC 20555 '
Dear Mr. Meyer:
i Haddam Neck Plant ,
Millstone Nuclear Power Station, Unit Nos. 1, 2, and 3 ~'
Comments on Proposed Revision 3 to Reaulatory Guide 1.9 On November 14, 1988,U) the Nuclear Regulatory Commission published for '
public comment Revision 3 to Regulatory Guide (RG) 1.9, " Selection, Design, Qualification, Testing, and Reliability of Diesel Generator Units Used as Onsite Electric Power Systems at Nuclear Power Plants." Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company (CYAPC0) and Northeast Nuclear Energy Company (NNE hereby respectively submit the following comments. On January 18,1989,g the comment period was extended to March 14, 1989.
Backaround i
Proposed Revision 3 to RG 1.9 has been prepared for the resolution of Generic )
Safety Issue B-56, " Diesel Generator Reliability." The NRC Staff has previ- {
ously addressed diesel generator design, reliability, and operational aspects )
by using IEEE Std 387-1984, Revision 2 of RG 1.9, RG 1.108 (which is being l withdrawn), and Generic Letter 84-15. The purpose of this Revision 3 to RG 1.9 is to integrate into a single regulatory guide the guidance previously dispersed in these multiple documents.
l (1) 53 Federal Register 45831, November 14, 1988.
(2) 54 Federal Register 2009, January 18, 1989.
8903210102 890308 ,
PDR REGGD 01.009 C PNU
_ _ _ _ _ _ - . - - _ _ _ _ _ - - - - - - - - - - . - . o
i '-
8 Mr. D. L. Heyer !
B13113f? age 2 March 8, 1989 i
General Comments First, NNECO and CYAPC0 recommend that the proposed Revision 3 to RG 1.9 be .
revised to incorporate additional flexibility to take into consideration the age of the emergency diesel generator (EDG) and the manufacturer's recommenda- j tions. Operations, instructions, and maintenance manuals provided with EDGs )
from the manufacturer should be the source documents for establishing preven- '
tative maintenance schedules and surveillance requirements. All EDGs have'not been built to the same specifications and criteria and therefore should not be arbitrarily subjected to the same testing requirem:.nts. This section should include instead a reference to the recently published standard, ASME/ ANSI OM-16, Inservice Testina and Maintenance of Diesel Drives in Nuclear Power Plants. This standard provides requirements for in-service testing and j
maintenance of diesel drives that are utilized in nuclear power plants. These -
diesel drives perform a specific function in shutting down a reactor or in ;
mitigating the consequences of .an accident. This standard covers the period j beginning with the diesel drive start-up and continuing through the life of i the plant. Test intervals, te::t methods, data requirements, and criteria for '
evaluation of the test results are provided.
Secondly, the draft RG 1.9 appears to direct nuclear plants to dedicate a f great deal of additional resources to the review and evaluation of EDG perfor- i mance. CYAPC0 and NNECO already dedicate a significant amount of resources to EDG monitoring and evaluation due to RG 1.08, Generic Letter 84-15, Institute of Nuclear Power Operation and Electric Power Research Institute documents and the Nuclear Plant Reliability Data System. Existing EDG monitoring programs have successfully demonstrated reliability goalsperfgan'9 In addition, CYAPC0 and NNEC0 use probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) as a means of determining the impact of the EDG failure on plant risk. The EDG failure .
rates in the PRA models are updated as necessary to reflect current assessed reliability. Should the EDG reliability performance substantially change, this would subsequently be reflected in the PRA, and brought to management attention. .
r l While CYAPC0 and NNECO agree that the EDGs are vitally important to the safe operation of nuclear power plants, the draft RG 1.9 does not provide utilities with the flexibility needed to integrate advantageous features of this program l into existing EDG reliability programs.
Specific comments on RG 1.9 are attached for your consideration.
(3) Institute of Nuclear Power Operation Nuclear Power Plant Performance Indicators 1988 Mid-Year Report published the following EDG unavailability data for July 1987 through June 1988 for each unit:
Haddam Neck Plant, 0.002; Millstone Unit No.1, 0.002; Millstone Unit No. 2., 0.000. Please note that adequate data was not available on Millstone Unit No. 3 to calculate EDG unavailability data.
i l
Mr.'D. L'. Meyer B13113/Page 3 March 8, 1989 We trust that these comments will be useful in the finalization of Revision 3 l to RG 1.9.
< Very truly yours, CONNECTICUT YANKEE ATDMIC POWER COMPANY NORTHEAST NUCLEAR ENERGY COMPANY E. 'U./Mroczka //
Senior Vice President cc: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory temmission, Do:umeret Control Desk W. T. Russell, Region I Administrator M. L. Boyle, NRC Project Manager, Millstone Unit No. I G. S. Vissing, NRC Project Manager, Millstone Unit No. 2 D. H. Jaffe, NRC Project Manager, Hillstone Unit No. 3
, A. B. Waag, NRC Project Manager, Haddam Neck Plant l W. J. Raymond, Senior Resident Inspector, Millstone Unit Nos.1, 2, and 3 J. T. Shedlosky, Senior Resident Inspector, Haddam Neck Plant A. W. Serkiz, Regulatory Publications Branch, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Office of Administration and Resources Management A. Marion Nuclear Management and Resources Council 1776 Eye Street, NW Suite 300 Washington, DC 2006-2496
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ' - - ^ '- ^ ^ ~ ~ ^ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
i s
.i' , , .
Docket Nos. 50-213 50-245 t .
50-336 I' 50-423 B13113 l
Attachment Specific Comments on RG 1.9 a
b E
March 1989 w; _
1 I
Mr. D. L. Meyer l Attachment /B13113/Page1 March 8, 1989 Introduction. Paraaraoh 7 The words " degrade with age" are not meaningful unless they are related to
. potential failure effects.
CYAPC0 and NNECO recommend the following change: "Unless the diesel genera-tors are properly maintained, age-related changes 'may progress to the point where a required operating function may be threatened."
Discussion. Paraaraoh 5 The wording suggests that the generator differential current trip may result from an overspeed condition. This is not the case, as the differential protection serves to detect electrical failures within the zone protected during all starting and running conditions of the diesel.
Discussion. Paraaraoh 6 Provided that the reliability goa'l of the diesel can be maintained at the target level, it should not be necessary to limit the number of automatic trips provided under an " accident" scenario. Spurious or unwanted trips during surveillance testing will result in a decrease in reliability which may still, hcwever, remain above the target level. The advantages of adequate protective devices in limiting equipment damage and allowing a more ready return to service could more than offset potential interference with the successful functioning of the unit. The target reliability goal is demon-strated by surveillance testing when all of the protective trips are in service.
Reaulatory Position. Section 10.2.1.1 This section needs to be clarified. The first sentence states that the diesel i should start from standby and attain required voltage ano frequency within
" acceptable time limits." The second sentence states that the diesel be slow l started and reach rated voltage and frequency on a "prespecified schedule" l selected to minimize stress and wear. Are the " acceptable time limits" and "prespecified schedule" one in the same? Acceptable time limits may be interpreted as the time requirements for the diesel to attain rated voltage and frequency to accept safety-related loads during an accident to satisfy the safety anelysis. Acceptable time limits for a slow start should be a manufac-turers' recommendation. There should be differentiation between a slow start and a fast start.
In addition, this section should allow for EDGs that cannot be slow started.
For instance, Millstone No.1 EDG cannot be slow started due to the design of the speed and voltage control systems. During each test start, the engine is o
et Mr. D. L. Meyer Attachment /813113/Page 2 March 8, 1989 l brought up to full speed and voltage at tne same rate as during an emergency l
demand start.
l Reaulatory Position. Section 10.2.1.2 i
This monthly load test should depend on manufacturers' recommendations. Not all manufacturers recommend full load tests; at Millstone Unit No. 2 the manufacturer recommends a 75 percent load test to minimize stress.
The basis for establishing a " prescribed schedule" for diesel generator loading and unloading is reasonable. However, the section should elaborate more on the definition of a " prescribed schedule." This should also be in accordance with manufacturers' recommendations.
Reaulatory Position. Section 10.2.2 The cr'.,eria for accelerated testing should not be based solely and uncondi-tionally on test failure statistics. If test failures can be attributed to isolated failures of components of the diesel system, increasing the test frequency will reduce the reliability of the diesel from additional unneces-sary starts rather than improving confidence. This section should be worded to provide flexibility in specifying acceleded testing when good engineering judgment determines it to be prudent.
Reaulatory Position. Section 10.2.3,.1 It is understood that manual prelubrication in accordance with manufacturers recommendations is allowed so as to prevent unnecessary stress to the bearings from a dr ter 84-15.g'ptart. This was described in NNECO's response to Generic Let-Reaulatory Position Section 10.2.3.2 Loading the generator to its continuous rating in less than its design acci-dent sequence time every 6 months is unnecessary and causes excessive stress on the generator, and is inconsistent with ensuring maximum generator avail-ability.
(1) '
W. G. Counsil letter to D. G. Eisenhut, "Information Requested by Generic Letter 84-15," dated February 4, 1985.
,r .
a s Mr. D. L. Meyer--
Attachment /B13113/Page3 March 8, 1989 Reaulatory 30sition. Section 10.2.4 CYAPC0 a'nd NNEC0 question the need to perform a simulated loss of off-site 3 power test (Section 10.2.4.1) separate from an autostart (SIAS) signal test (Section.10.2.4.2)sincethetwoareperformedtogether(Section10.2.4.3).
Reaulatory _ Position. Section 10.2.4.2 This section should state that it is only applicable if the diesel gets an i autostart signal during' an SIAS. This is not the case at Millstone Unit No. 2.
Reaulatory Position. Section 10.2.4.3 This section should provide flexibility to remove some emergency loads during the test by placing breakers in test position; for example, to prevent the possible undesirable starting of emergency injection pumps during shutdeun conditions.
Reaulatorv iosition Section 10.2.4.6 This test should 'only be part of preoperational testing, not every refueling.
This test stresses the engine 9 necessarily and excessively for limited informational gain.
Reaulatory Position. Section 10.2.4.9 The method to demonstrate that all diesel generator trips are bypassed (except
'or engine.overspeed and generator differential) should not create the poten-tial for the actual condition that causes a bypassed trip (i.e., do . not intentionally cause a low lube oil pressure or a high temperature condition).
A statement of caution should be included in this section.
Reaulatorv Position. Section 10.2.4.11
. This test is also excessive and unnecessary for limited informational gain.
Reaulatory Position. Section 11 This section regarding environmental qualification is of little value if the diesels are located in mild environments such as those at Millstone Unit Nos. 1, 2, and 3 and the Haddam Neck Plant.
Reaulatory Position. Section 16 l The logging and reporting criteria is greater than what NNECO and CYAFC0 l consider adequate. Millstone and Haddam Neck use the Preventative Maintenance i
- l. :
V 1 L
l - -
, s l Mr. D. L. Meyer j Attachment /B13113/Page 4 l March 8, 1989 Management System and Plant incident Reports for documentation, failure analysis, and corrective actions. Extensive changes to existing procedures would be required to include those additional items the Regulatory Guide recommends.
! Reaulatory Position. SectioD_18 The entire section is wordy and provides too much detail regarding a diesel generator reliability program. The section goes beyond what is necessary for the Regulatory Guide. Reference to ASME 0&M Standard No.16 would provide a good example of what a reliability and maintenance program could contain.
Each individual utility should be allowed flexibility to establish its own diesel generator reliability program based on less specific guidelines. This section contains a good foundation that along with general guidelines, will allow the utility to establish a program specific to its diesels' needs. The requirements of the program should take into consideration the age of the plant, the design basis, und the applicable codes and standards for which the diesels were installed. This section must have enough flexibility to allow plants to add the most necessary, advantageous, and cost effective features from this proposed program to their existing EDG reliability programs. An extensive analytical program is not needed as long as the utility can maintain a reliability which exceeds that required for the applicable station blackout position.
_ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - _ - _ _ _- _ _ __ ___ - - _ _-- - _ - _ __- -