ML20023D213
| ML20023D213 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | LaSalle, 05000000 |
| Issue date: | 08/25/1982 |
| From: | C.F. BRAUN & CO. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20023A480 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-82-366 NUDOCS 8305190387 | |
| Download: ML20023D213 (34) | |
Text
-
Attach nnt 3 ,
. . 1 t . I s.
t l
t t
COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY LASALLE COUNTY STATION l
CHICAGO, ILLINOIS I
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL PROJECT 63,56-N i
l .
('
C F BRAUN & CO ALHAMBRA, CALIFORNIA I
AUGUST 25, 1982 . t l
f i
l D' 8305190387 830311 PDR FOIA PRENDER82-366 PDR c r mRACN & co
_ . - - - _ _ - - . - . - - - - - . . . - ~ . . _ . . . - _ . . _ , - . - . - . . , . - _ - - . - . ..._ .
I, .
Attnehunt 3
. I t
r-
. l l
CONTENTS 1
l SCOPE OF WORK
( i WORK PLAN l l
ORGANIZATION l
RESUMES l
EXPERIENCE i
Y.*
Commonwealth Edison company, Project 6356-N, August 25, 1982 \ l C F BRAUN es CO l
,. . 1-1 s
- Attachment 3 SCOPE OF WORK 1
The scope of work for this project is to perform an independent review
- r. of the safety-related, and seismic supported non-safety related HVAC systems at the Commonwealth' Edison Company (CECO)'LaSalle Nuclear Plant. 's The review will include all seven LaSalle unit one safety-related HVAC systems listed below.
- Control Room NVAC System (System Identification Code VC)
- Auxiliary Electric Equipment Room HVAC System (VE) f - Diesel-Generator Room Ventilation System (VD)
- CSCS Equipment Area Cooling System (VY)
- Switch Gear Rooms Ventilation Systems (VX), except for the recirculation duct in the Auxiliary Building HVAC Equipment
- Room.
< - Portions of the Reactor Building Ventilation System (VR) -
The following parts of the reactor building ventilation system are safety-related. -
- Supply air duct between and including the secondary-
, containment isolation dampers and the duct penetration -
of the secondary containment boundary.
- Exhuast air duct between and including secondary containment isolation dampers, and the. duct penetration
. of the secondary containment boundary.
- Exhaust air duct between and including secondary _
containment isolation dampers, and the duct penetration of th'e tecondary containment _ boundary. .
- Those portions of the Standby Gas Treatment System SGTS (VG) installed by the Zack Co.
- The review will also include the supports for all three non-safety related but seismically supported systems listed below:
- Primary Containment Ventilation System (VP) .
- Primary Containment Purge System (VQ) 1
~
- Reactor Building Ventilating System (VR) k l
j Commonwealth Edison Company, Project 6356-N, August 25, 1982 1 C F BRAUN da CO
( .
- ' 1 l
1-2 '
- db At90chment 3 '
) SCOPE OF WORK Continued ,
The primary objective o'f this independent' review is to provide verification that the HVAC installation by the Zack Co is in
' '( , accordance with the sargent and Lundy design. The scope of work will include, but not be limited to, a review of -
Material installed Field and shop welding on supports and ductwork Operab,ility of associated mechanical equipment !
Significant design changes
(.s Field testing by Zack Co up to, and including, any construction testing performed by Zack Co or their subcontractors.
1 I
During this review Braun will be responsible for identifying any additional testing or changes necessary to assure that the EVAC systems fulfill their safety function. Braun will also review the i I
adequacy and results of additional tests as performed by others.
All observations made durin"g the review shall be documented and submitted to a Braun site review team composed of senior technical
- personnel with broad experience in technical management. This review team will determine if the observation is accurate and has .
the potential for a safety concern. If the team determines that l
the observation is accurate, but is not a safety concern, it shall
. be submitted to CECO for disposition.
l If the obse'rvation is considered a potential safety concern, it shall be. submitted to a second level internal review' committee. ~
The .
internal review committee, located Jbt the home office, will review the finding expeditiously and if the finding is not a safety concern, they shall . indicate -in , writing why not and return the finding for appropriate disposition. If it is determined'to be a safety concern, they shall indicate in writing why and return the finding to the Braun project manager. He will notify CECO of this safety related
. finding.
( -
A final report documenting this review shall be sent to CECO which -
will, in turn, concurrently distribute the reports, unedited, to .
the NRC staff, S&L, and internally within CECO. Prior review or editorial control of the written report by any of these parties will
~
not be made.
i
(' .
Commonwealth Edison Company, Project 6356-N, August 25, 1982 i C F B R A L*N & CO
_ ___ _ _ ____ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - - - . _~, -
~
- 1-3 J Attachoent 3 l l
/ SCOPE OF WORK Continued All inspection, review activities, quality assurance, project
's procedures, to be performed by C F Braun & Co during this independent review of the BVAC systems will be conducted in accordande with f N written, approved procedures. These procedures will contain all the necessary forms to document the Braun activities with regard to this review. Those procedures will include but not necessarily be limited to the following Braun activities: ,
a) Document control b) Quality control Inspection c) Interface between the Braun Site and the
(, Braun Office Internal Review Committee i d) Quality Control Inspection e) Training and Qualification of Inspectors to the Requirements of ANSI-N 45.2.6 - 1978 (Regulatory Guide 1.58) f) Quality Assurance Audits
~
g) Qualification of Quality Assurance Program Audit
. Personnel to the Requirements of ANSI-N 45.2.23 - 1978 h) Processing of Observations / Findings Report
- l During the review it is understood that CECO will make available all documents -requested by Braun that are needed to perform this review.
As part of this work Braun will. provide for CECO approval the Braun Quality Assurance Manual and QA Topical Report, and Braun's Security Screening Procedure. We will also have all personnel involved in this review e'xecute the required CECO forms that show freedom of substantial interest in CECO or Eack Co.
It is our, intent to provide adequate support of this review effort so that the report of our findings will be submitted by Braun to
(, CECO and the NRC simultaneously. The target date for this submittal is September 15, 1982 or subsequent date as directed by CECO.
i i
i ,
i /i
\- ,
! 2t Commonwealth Edison Company, Project 6356-N, August 25, 1982 i l
CF BRAUN & CO
I - ,' . .
2-1 Attachmsnt 3 WORK PLAN ,"
- This section of the proposal describes the work plan for Braun's independent review of the EVAC installation of the Zack Co at CECO
(' LaSalle Nuclear plant. Braun sent a team of knowledgeable individuals I i
- (Vice President of Power, Manager of Nuclear Projects, and Review Team
)
Project Manager) to Chicago in order to describe the Braun organization, '
present their experience and qualifications and highlight their availability. This was accomplished for the benefit of CECO and SsL l as well as in a separate meeting with the NRC Region III office.
In order to accomplish the review task, Braun will form a project team at the LaSalle site consisting of project manager, NVAC technical i advisor, QA engineer, welding / material engineer, QC supervisor, and i other personnel to work under the supervision of these individuals.
(~ Certain key people will be sent to LaSalle in order to develop QA instructions, detail work procedures and other activities which are required prior to commencement of productive work.
The HVAC technical advisor will compare the S&L design documents to !
the Zack Co shop drawings.to verify that Zack has correctly !
interpreted the design documents. Zack's procedures for procurement j and processing of HVAC material will be reviewed by the QA and '
welding / material engineers to evaluate their conformance to appropriate S&L design documents and ANSI standards.
The welding / material engineer will also review the weld procedure qualifications and welder qualifications associated with the ductwork j fabrication practices. Any information or testing generated by CECO '
or Conam will be.used to assist in this evaluation. Zack's i ,
fabrication procedures will be compared to SMACNA standards'and ANSI 509 requirements, as appropriate, in addition to that required by the l design documents.
The HVAC technical advisor will' survey all of the installed duct systems as defined on page 1-1 of the SCOPE OF WORK. Based on this survey he will select portions of the system whose failure may jeopardize the. operation of safety-related equipment for detailed inspection. The portions selected will include concealed and insulated ductwork. If discrepancies are found in the selected portions, then additional portions of ductwork will be selected for further inspection. Braun is prepared to inspect 100 percent of the system
(_ if deemed necessary.
The leak rate and balancing test for the Control Room RVAC System (VC),
CSCS Equipment Area Cooling System (VY) and portions of the Reactor Building Ventilation System (VR) will be reviewed in detail to verify, system conformance to the design documents. Spot checks will be made l of the Auxiliary Electric Equipment Room EVAC System (VE), Diesel Generator Room Ventilation System (VD) and Switch Gear Rooms Ventilation Systems (vX) to ascertain that they have been tested to the ,
same quality as that of the systems reviewed in detail. In addition,
([ the RVAC technical advisor will survey the syst'e m operating tests performed by CECO to verify that the results confirm the adequacy of the balancing / leak rate tests.
Commonwealth Edison Company, Project 6356-N, August 25, 1982 ,
CF BRAUN 6 CO
. - - - . - - - . - - . - _ . - - . . - - . - . .. - _ -E
. 4.,
*~~ Attach 22nt 3 WORK PLAN Continued ,.
I A review of the EVAC refrigerant system, subcontracted by Zack, will also be accomplished. Preliminary information indidate's that there i
s rs 'I s.
have been no nonconformances generated against these systems.
' In addition to this step-by-step review of the sack installation, I Braun will review all CECO and sack NCRs and FCRs generated against
' the installed system. Each document will be categorized by type for example, weld problear material certification lackings location /
dimensional / interference discrepancy fabrication problemt etc. The
' frequency of occurrence and importance of each category will be l' assessed. Twenty percent of those types determined to be critical to' safety will be inspected in detail to verify that the specified If discrepancies are
. r disposition has been correctly implemented.
A found, then the remaining NCRs of this type will be reviewed.
The HVAC technical advisor will randomly select other parts ofThe the system to be inspected for similar types of nonconformances. ;
i inspections will result in a determination of whether or not similar types of nonconformances may have existed on these random sections .
but were not reported. ,
l Project instructions and quality assurance procedures will be written to provida direction and guidance in' accomplishing the work plan.
Appropriate forms will be provided to document the observations and findings made during the course of 'tihe work.
All available inspection reports will be reviewed to determine if the inspector's observations may lead to a potential finding. Such reports will be evaluated by a site review committee consisting of project manager, QA engineer, and HVAC technical advisor or material / ,
welding engineet, depending on the expertise required. The site review committee will determine if the observatten is accurate and has the pctential for a safety concern.
If the site review determines that the observation is accurate, but is not a safety concern, it will be properly documented and submitted ,
to CECO for appropriate disposition. Dispositioning may involve field-t correction, additional analysis, or both.
I If the finding is considered a potential safety concern, it will be forwarded to an Thisinternal review committee committee will be chaired within by Braun's Braun chief for their nuclear concurrence.
engineer and will include senior technical personnel in the appropriate field of expertise for the finding being avaluated.
If this committee determines that the finding is a safety concern, the project manager will immediately notify CECO. . CECO will Rroperly i document and disposition such finding (including taking proper action in accordance with the technical specifications), and notify the NRC.
h .
/
2r_ s-I Commonwealth Edison Company, Project 6356-N, August 25, 1982 C F BRAUN & CO l
__e-. . _ _ - - - - - - - - __ __ .__.-__-__.-w-,., _ , , _ ,. _.,.- , - - - , - - - - _ _ , ,
.e- - , . _ - - - , , ---------r-
3-1 Attachssnt 3 PROJECT ORGANIZATION This section of the proposa1Idescribes the organization and people
, (~ Braun will use for this project. First, we--describe our Project organization, including an organization chart. Then, we enclose resumes for the candidates for all positions on the chart.
We plan to use a task force approach, with home of'fice personnel being assigned to the project and located at the LaSalle County Station.
The internal review committee will be located in Alhambra. Other specialists may be added to the task force as required.
An organization chart for the project follows. Responsibilities for
. - the positions shown on the chart are defined below.
(
PROJECT MANAGER The Project Manager has the prime responsibility for execution of the project. He is responsible to CECO and to Braun management for the overall success of the project. His principal areas.of concern are the planning, scheduling, and performance of the work. He issues the project instructiong, procedures and schedules' for the execution of the work, and keeps them current. He is your
- principal contact on these matters, and reports on all elements of l
progress to you. The project manager has the organizational freedom to call on all resources of the company to support the project in areas required. He reports to the-Manager"of Nuclear Projects of the Power Division. ,
QUALITY ASSURANCE ENGINEFR .The Project Quality Assurance Engineer is responsible for all project QA activities. Those activities include the writing of all quality assurance procedure,s necessary to perform !
an independent review of the ten designated NVAC systems at CECO's LaSalle Nuclear Station. The PQAE will obtain the necessary approvals for these procedures. He will establish a document control system and provide for'the collection, maintenance and storage of all QA records generated.~during this Independent Review, in accordance with the Requirements of. ANSI-N 45.2.9.. The PQAE will review and sign-off on all observation / finding reports prior to'the'ir being'sent to the .
Management Review Committee in Alhambra. He'will assure himself that I all personnel participating in this review are qualified to perform I the task to which they have been assigned. He will assure that these
(' qualifications are properly documented in accordance with ANSI-N 45.2.6 and ANSI-N 45.2.23. The PQAE will than provide for the monitor,ing, surveillance and auditing of all activities, both Project and Inspection. All audits will be performed to pre-planned check list and will be distributed to both Braun's Management and Commonwealth Edison Management simultaneously. All audits will be performed in accordance with the C F Braun & Co's Nuclear Quality Assurance Manual and will be documented on the forms contained therein.
a-
.U i
l Commonwealth Edison Company, Project 6356-N, August 25, 1982 .
C F B R A L* N & CO l
i 32 '.
- Attachm nt 3 PROJECT ORGANIEATION Continund QOALITY CONTROL SUPERVISOR The Quality Control Supervisor will
- interface with the HVAC Engineer on matters relating to the p inspection, of'the WAC hangers and ducting.
All requests for duct'and hanger inspection made by the HVAC Engineer will be presented to the QC Supervisor who will assign the work to an inspector. The QC Supervisor will make contact with site construction 5 ' __ personnel making arrangements for scaffolding around the work area, )
removal of paint, insulation or other materials that may interfere j with the inspection. Additional items such as drawings, FCRs, NCRs, I or surface inspection materials will also be supplied by.the QC Supervisor when required to assist in the inspection.
(~ The inspection reports will be returned to the QC Supervisor for his f review. He will complete additional forms if reportable findings j are determined during inspection and distribute thems forms to the l HVAC Engineer and Project Manager for review. ,
i The QC Supervisor will assist in duct and hanger inspection when a required and we.rk with the Braun Material / Welding Engineer to resolve questions regarding weld quality and material identification.
HVAC TECHNICAL ADVISOR The HVAC Technical' Advisor will determine which HVAC system or part of an HVAC system will be inspected. He I will work with the QC Supervisor to_ assign the Quality Control l inspection assignments for the HVAC ductwork and ductwork supports.
The NCR and FCR will be reviewed to determine if the ductwork,'as 4 called out in the NCR or FCR should be inspected.
The HVAC Technical Advisor is responsible for verifying that the HVAC ,
systems have been installed in accordsnee with the design drawings and that the systems fulfill their safety functions. He provides guidance to the QC Supervisor and materials / welding advisor as to the extent and nature of their reviews. The advisor will survey the installed HVAC systems and select those portions requiring detail inspections.
t He is also responsible for. reviewing the applicable tests performed by the HVAC contractor plus a survey of the associated HVAC preoperational tests performed by CECO. Another aram of his review will be the .
{ installation of the refrigerant system. He will also assist in a review of any applicable nonconformances and field change requests .
as wel1~as participating in the site review committee in his area of expertise. l r
M .
I Commonwealth Edison Company, Project 6356'N, August 25, 1982 CF sRAL*N & CO l l
l l
PROJECT ORGANIZATION Continued Attachment 3
. WELDING AND MATERIAL SPECIALIST The, Welding and Material Specialist is responsible for the review of all welding procedures which were used by the contractor. He will review all welder qualifications of
(. the contractors' personnel who performed that welding. He will assist in the evaluation and determination of the integrity of the welding which has been completed by the contractor. Should any material sampling (chemicals) or weld tensiles be required he would assist {
in the sampling and test evaluations as necessary. l l
This Welding and Material Specialist will be utilized extensively 1 as a consultant whenever any problem involving Metallurgy arises. !
Additionally, he will be utilized in the review of nonconformances and field change requests involving welding of duct hanger support {
and duct joints.
1 I
I 1
r i
l .
l
(. .
i 1 o
. ~
M -
Commonwealth 2dison Company, Project 6356-N, Augu:.t 25, 1982 l C F BRAUN as CO
--.---_-e____. ----A.___ _~ __ - -.- , - - - - -
g, p ^
) ']
PROJECT ORGANIZATION i
CECO C F BRAUN PROJECT MANAGER .
PROJECT MANAGER B R SHELTON A J KEMPIAK .
CHAIRMAN INTERNAL
, REVIEW COMMITTEE R N MOORE f
I .
. F M PATTERSON L F KARNS p_______-
I !
a I y Q A ENGINEER ' O C SUPERVISOR HVAC TECHNICAL WELDING S MATERIAL 0 AD VISOR SPECIALIST $
J S FIEDLER R W PHILLIPS J R MOORE A HONARDOOST 3 o "
W F REYNOLDS K S RAJU 8
L P ROZBORSKI E
I l
w
, COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY, PROJECT 6356-N, AUGUST 25,1982 i n
0 __ -
~
. 4-1 RESUMES Attachment 3 KEY PERSONNEL
'. The following are the key personnel we propose for this project. Their resumes are inc16ded on succeeding pages.
NAME PROJECT POSITION PAGE
^
A J Kempisk Project Manager 4_2 i
J S Fiedler Quality Assurance Engineer 4-3 R W Phillips Quality Control Supervisor 4-4 J R Moore HVAC Technical Advisor 4-5 A Honardoost Welding and Material Specialist 4-6 W F Reynolds Senior Inspector 47 L P'Roxborski Sanier Inspector 4-8 .
~
K S Raju RVAC Engineer _ 4_9 R N Moore Chairman Internal Review Committee 4 1o F M Patterson Internal Review Committee Member 4 11 :
L F Karns Internal Review Committee Member 4 12 l i
i l
s
[ 1-
- ~~
t Commonwealth Edison Company, Project'6356-N, August 25, 1982 !
CF BRAUN & CO
J' -
~~
.- 4-2
. Attachesnt 3
- PROJECT EEGINEER A J KEMPIAK Andy Kampiak has ever 17 years experience in power '
- - and related fields, including the past 15 with Braun. His primary areas of expertise include mechanical systems and EVAC engineering.
Bis current assignment is as Engineering Manager for the 1220 MWe TVA power' plant project. Bare he directs four pro' ject engineers i responsible for building design coordination, customer interface, supplier review, and coordination with field forces. Prior to this, he served as Project Engineer for field coordination activities, involving monthly meetings with owner and field engineering staff. j Andy was leader of a group of.up to 15 engineers and designers
~
i i responsible for mechanical system and the HVAC design and layout I activities on the TVA project. Systems designed included waste processing, service, cooling, and heated water, and chilled water systems. He was responsible for the design of all chilled water systems on the TVA project, and wrote procurement specifications for major chiller packages. Other systems he designed and specified equipment for include gas filtration and fire protection.
Within Braun's building mechanical group, he was responsible for !
various typas of EVAC and utilities systems. As group leader on l the Lawrence Livermore project, he' prepared P&I flow diagrams, design and procurament specifications, EVAC and piping drawings, and preoperational test specifications for all utility systems.
He was also responsible for EVAC system design and checkout on several Rocky Flats Weapons Facility projects. He designed complex ductwork systems, sized fans and other equipment, and worked as a l field engineer on a plant expansion program. [
t on the USAF Satellite Test Center and Power Plant project, he.was responsible.for all HVAC design. This included the design of l i
supply and exhaust air systems for gas turbine units and heat
~
recovery boilers, luut the design of the. air-conditioning system for the plant, including chillers, EVAC units, and associated j equipment.
( Mr Kampiak has a BSME degree' from the University of Illinois, and l is a registered professional mechanical engineer in California.
l
~
i
. i
. . l l r i ..
l Commonwealth Odison Company, Project 6355-::, August 25, 1?S2 :l
. C F s P A L* N & CO
4-3
- Attachment 3 QUALITY ASSURANCE ENGINEER . .
' J S FIEDLER Jim has over 30 years experience in nuclear 's engineering and construction, the past 12 years as the Project Quality throughout Assurance Engineer the United States.on various nuclear power plants They include the Duane Arnold facility at Palo, Iowa, a 550 KW BWR unit for Iowa Electric. Light and Power Company, the Greenwood Energy Center consisting of one fossil plant (800 MW) and a four-unit nuclear plant, PWR units (1250 MW each) for the Detroit Edison Company, the St Lucie nuclear unit 1, an 8 u MW PWR for Florida Power and Light, the Waterferd III nuclear unit, a 900 MW PWK for Louisiana Power and Light.
- Sir.:e joining Braun in 1977 he has been assigned as the Project Quality Assurance Engineer on the Baily nuclear project, a 600 MW BWR unit for Northern Indiana Public Service Company and is currentlySTRIDE GE/TVA assigned as the Project Quality Assurance Engineer on the projects.
Prior to specializing in quality assurance, Jim was a design and operations engineer at the University of California's Lawrence Radiation Laboratories at Berkeley, California and was the site representative for the Universities' Research Association during construction Batavia, of the Fer=i-National Accelerator Laboratory at Illinois.
Before his university association he spent eight years as a design engineer Pittsburgh,with Westinghouse Electric Company, Bettis Facility in Pennsylvania US Navy nuclear program., during the early development of the Mr.Fiedler has a BA from Waynesburg College, and a BSME from the !'
University.cf. West Virginia. He is a r'gistered e professional engineer in Pennsylvania. I 4 e 1
e- l O
Commonwealth Edison Company, Project 6356-M, August 25, 1982 I i
C F a R A L* N k CO
= 2 - ---_. - -- _ . --_.--_-~ - - --
4-4 Attachment 3
'29ALITY ' ONTROL C SUPERVI5OR R W PHILLIPS Bob has 20 years experience in Source Quality Control, eight years with Braan. His latest assignments with Braun include
.. Source Inspection Coordinator on four projects. Be was in charge of implementing,the Positive Material Identification Program, currently in use. This included the operation of the analysis equipment required in the PMI program. .
Bob's other duties have involved conducting training and certification of personnel in liquid penetrant, magnetic particle, radiographic and ultrasonic examination as a certified NDE Level III Examiner. Also inspection of pressure vessels, heat exchangers, piping, furnace equipment, pumps,' storage tanks and structurals.
- Prior to working at Braun, while at Richardson X-Ray Company, Bob
.. directed operation of a commercial nondestructive inspection laboratory. While at Boeing, Bob performed plant surveys and supplier audits in NDE and electrodeposited plating facilities.
He conducted inspec6 ion on components for aerospace use. At Richardson X-Ray Company, he was the quality control manager for
- a. nondestructive inspection facility. At Ferro-Spec Laboratories, he managed a commercial nondestructive inspection laboratory. And, at Aerojet General he also performed source inspection and wrote manufacturing procedures in quality engineering.
Mr Phillips attended Mt San Antonio College. heisamemberof the American Society of Nondestructive Testing.
~-
t s .
g
(.
Commonwealth E31 son Company, Project 6356-N, August 25, 1982 t s CF B R A L*N & CO l .
\
~
s-y
~
-Attechernt 3
., MECHANICAL ENGINEER .
J R MOORE Jack has 31 years experience in the mechanical g
- engineering field, the past 14 at Braun. He is presently a principa2 t; engineer in the Mechanical Engineering Department. His primary .
N, areas of expertise are in EVAC, fire protection, and plumbing and ,
piping systems.
He is presently the leader of the HVAC group on the TVA STRIDE project. In this role he is responsible for all group functions, including heating and cooling calculations, design and specification of equipment, ductwork arrangement and sizing, and determination of environmental conditions in normal operation and accident conditions.
( .,
t* His'other nuclear projects include field and home office assign =ents on the Rocky Flats Part V Expansion and Plutonium Re'covery projects. Here he designed sophisticated three-zona EVAC systems for use in areas where protection of operating personnel from very hazardous plutonium substances was vital. He also was active in the fire protection area on these projects. Finally, he prepared design criteria, specifications, and estimates for the General Electric LMFBR project.
Jack's other assignments at Braun have' included US Air Force facilities, a tetraethyl lead plant, an x-ray telescope, and a form latex plant. .
Prior to joining Braun, he was with Ralph M Parsons, where he worked
, primarily on Minuteman missile projects in the environmental and EVAC areas. With J B Pomeroy and Co, he designed air conditiening systems, plumbing, process piping, and fire protection, for a Polaris missil'a manufacturing facility and Vandenburg AFB. His other experience-includes industrial drying systems and liquid carbon dioxide fire protection systems.
Mr Moore' holds a BSME degre'e'from Chicago Technical College.
I
<~
s
.s l
l i
Com=onwealth Edison Company, Project 6356-3, August 25, 1552
. CF sRACN & CO l _ _ _ _ . _ _ .
W , . . . -
4-6 Attechmsnt 3 METALLURGICAL ENGINEER, A HONARDOOST Abbas Bonardoost has over'15 years experience, primarily in the power field. He selects critical metallic and 5 nonmetallic materials used for equipment in Braun-engineered
( process plants. Reviews job specifications for agreer.ent of all materials selection and fabrication with Braun standards, customer '
standards, and the various applicable codes. Provides materials and welding consultation on various assigned projects. Provides technical assistance on metallurgical matters to Sales, Engineering, Power, Construction, and others. Performs complex metallurgical research assignments on projects relating to fabrication, mechanical properties, or corrosion of metals and alloys. He has been with Braun for one year.
~'. Prior to joining Braun, Abbas served as a Senior Quality Engineer
. with Gilbert Commonwealth. Here his primary duties involved preparation of welding and non-destructive testing procedures for both in-hcuse and subcontractor applications on a number of power projects. In this role he worked.with various members of the project team on problem areas which arose in equipment fabrication shops, field construction, and during plant operation.
Included in his assignments was an audit of welding procedures in the HVAC and piping systems in a nuclear power plant.
Abbas also worked with Burns & Roe as a Senior Metallurgical Engineer. Here he worked closely-with subcontractors on welding and heat treatment procedures in compliance with ASME, ASTM, ANSI, AWS, and NRC requirements. He was a site engineer on the WPPSS No 2 project,. resolving problems in corrosion, failure analysis, and welding of piping and HVAC systems. This assignment included review of field procedures and performand qua'lification of welders.
l As a Corrosion Engineer at Ebasco Services, he was responsible for all phases of corrosion prevention on nuclear and fossil power plants, refineries, and chemical and petrochemical facilities.
This work included the development of laboratory testing programs for protective coatings, and the design and supervision of cathodic protection' systems.
Prior to joining Ebasco Services, Abbas was corrosion and inspection
< engineer with the National Iranian Oil Company and a materials
~
- 6. engineer with M R Grace.
Mr Honardoost received his BSchE from the University of Delaware, and his MS in Metallurgy from the E,tevens Institute of Technology.
He has been accredited as a corrosion specialist by the NACE, and is an AWS Certified Welding Inspector.
l .
( Commonwealth Edison Company, Project 6356-N, August 25, 1982 i C F B R A L* N & CO
-. . ~ - _ .. . .. - - -
l . - - 4_7 Attachment 3
.. QA/QC COORDINATOR W F REYNOLDS Bill has over 30 years experience in management planning, estimating, design, procurement writing, procedure and N specification, quality assurance, quality control field erection, 1 and startup of new and expansion facilities embracing all fields of chemical plants, nuclear generating stations, conventional generating stations, and allied industrial compl. exes. 3-Quality Assurance Manager of a multi-billion dollar Saudi Arabian
. Project including development of the " Pioneer" Camp, establishing jobsite perimeters, initial development of a quality program for the management services contractors and establishment of bid l
analysis procedures in accordance with acceptable Saudi Arabian government criteria.
%- Corporate Quality Assurance Audit Team Leader for various Middle East projects. Development of audit checklists, preparation / notification to all responsible parties of audit dates and subjects, pre and post audit conferences culminating with the issuance of formal audit reports.
Field Quality Control Supervisor for one of the largest management services contracts including interviewing, staffing and supervision
( of quality control (OC) angineers, laboratory technicians, Saudi national engineering students and-QC inspectors. Published a Field i Quality Control Manual for the industrial complex, assigned QC :
personnel to various phases of construction, testing, contracts, procurement, and implementation of all disciplines within the *
" Kingdom" of Saudi Arabia.
Instrumentation Superintendent during construction / start-up of a 1.7 MGPD diesel unit including field' design'of sensing and loading lines ,
along with providing written and verbal instructions to internationalj
. instrument crews. The jobsite was the Saudi Naval Base in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, and the assignment included start-up of package boilers, i
checking out system controls by use of the logic diagrams, and actual l
pressure testing of the tubing /multitube " bundles".
l Start-up Engineer for two 960 MW nuclear power plants (BWR Mark III),
including develcpment of safeguard systems, punchlists, and progress reports.
s.
Mr Reynolds is 56 years old, and holds a PE degree from Marietta College. He is also certified to ANSI 45.2.6.
?
,~
i w
./
~ . -
Commonwealth Edison Company, Project 6356-N, August 25, 1982 l C F mRAUN & CO
,-,m-- -- - r ypy-y ,-4 , , . _ . --,m--- - . . . , , . - - - --,,--
~
4-8 Attachment 3
,. SOURCE QUALITY CONTROL INSPECTOR L P ROZBORSKI Larry has 33 years engineering and shop experience, 7 years of source inspection with Braun. He has been assigned to inspection of compressors, turbines, pressure vessels, towers, heat'- ss exchangers, storage tanks, furnace equipment, and other petrochem process equipment.
Larry's other duties have involved design angineering, shop layout and supervision. He is certified as a Level 2, to SNT-TC-1A in radiography, magnetic particle liquid penetrant and ultrasonic examinations. He is familiar with API, ASME, and TEMA Codes. He is certified senior engineering technicaan by the Institute for the Certification of Engineering Technicians. I I
Prior to working at Braun, while at Bos-Hatten, Inc, Larry was I responsible for all inspection procedurs3 and OC for ASME shop certification. He wrote welding procedures and maintained qualifications of welders to ASME standards. He held positions of shop superintendent and manager of engineering.
Larry also worked for American Standard as metallurgical lab technician, senior draftsman where he was responsible for all radiography,. nondestructive examinations an.d welder qualifications. ,
And, for Worthington Corporation as a design draftsman.
. _Mr Roxborski attended Erie Community College, evening extension ,
courses and various seminars conducted by technical societies.
He is a registered Professional Engineer in Quality Engineering in California. He is a member of the American Society of Mechanical
. Engineers, the American Welding Society and the American Society for Nondestructive Testing. ,
. i l
t i
. l i !
l
{ l i - '
l t
l .
I Commonwealth Edison Company, Project 6356-N, August 25, 1982 i C F 3RAUN & c0
, y-r. -
4-9 55 ,. -
Att'achment 3 .
~
I .
SENIOR MECHANICAL ENGINEER - NVAC
, ~s y
_ K S RAJU K S Raju has over 22 years.expeiience in the power engineering field, both nuclear and fossil. His primary areas of interest have been in the design and. specification of gas turbines, waste heat steam-systems, and refrigeration systems. He has been with Braun since December 15, 1980, performing engineering design on various NVAC systems for TVA's Hartsville nuclear power station.
While at Burns and Roe, he was the lead mechanical engineer for a pair of gas turbine / waste heat boiler cogeneration units for the City of Santa Clara. The generators produce 8 MWe each, and the boilers each produce 40,000 pounds per hour of 150 psig steam.
-. The combusters are natural gas-fired, with fuel oil as backup. He
, sized and wrote specifications for the gas turbines, steam generators, deaerators, feedwater treatment equipment, pumps, gas compressors, and instrumentation. He did piping flexibility analysis, and wrote preoperational and start-up procedures. He
- also engineered the entire steam and condensate. distribution systa=
between the city and steam customer, a paper products plant.
~
In another project, he was the lead mechanical engineer on five 330 MWe combined cycle power plants for Jersey Central Power and l Light Company, the Gilbert Station Units 4 through 8. On this 8 assignment, he was responsible for engineering the power cycle I piping, cooling water systems, steam and compressed air system, water treatment systems, fire protection, and NVAC. He also wrote installation specifications, and provided engineering assitance during construction and start-up.
While with Ebasco Services Inc, as a senior mechanical engineer he performed a wide variety of functions on two nuclear, two :
coal-fired, and ten hydroelectric power plants. He was responsible for NVAC, refrigeration, steam, cooling water, and condensate systems, and took a lead role in scheduling and manpower planning
-for.these projects. . l 3
Mr Raju is 48 years old, and holds BS and MS degrees in Mechanical Engineering.from Michigan Technological University. He is a
, member of the ASME.
e l <
( -
l Commonwealth Edison Company, Project 6356-N, August 25, 1982 ;
I C F 3 R A L* N & CO
-s---, w -s- - - -- --e -y -- _ , , p . . _ , _ _ . . _ . ,
4-10 Attechmsnt 3 CHIEF NUCLEAR ENGINEER R N MOORE Roger Moore has' 29, years experisnee in the nuclear field, including 8 years with Braun. He is presently Braun's Chief Nuclear Engineer, and his expertise and experience are primarily in the areas of nuclear engineering, safety, and licensing. -
In his present assignment, he is responsible for all nuclear and environmental aspects of Braun's nuclear power work. On the TVA STRIDE project, he provides design reviews in areas of nuclear safety, health physics, and shielding. He is also responsible for i
coordination with and reporting to the NRC on all matters of nuclear 1 safety. l His other projects at Braun have included Braun SAP., in which he participated in the design effort, and led the work to produce the i PSAR and eventually secure the preliminary design approval from ;
NRC. He also prepares license and permit' applications to state and federal authorities on environmental and nuclear matters, responds to questions from regulatory agencies, and gives expert testimony at public hearings. :
Prior to joining Braun, Roger was Director of Nuclear Services at Gulf States Utilities. Here he directed the environmental and nuclear. efforts on two Louisiana power plants. He coordinated the work of a number of environmental-consultants, and published the first Environmental Report based upon the new NRC format.
He was Superintendent of Engineering, Nuclear Division, fo'r Todd Shipyards, where he led the sngineering of the retrofit of a modernized design into the nuclear portion of the NS SAVANNAH. He also designed environmental control equipment and did control rod drive analysis for the LOFT project. He was also Manager of Training for nuclear matters at Babcock & Wilcox, where he qualified nuclear ship crews and coordinated.various research programs.
Mr Moore has a BA in chemistry .from'the University of' Colorado, and a business management certificate from UCLA. He is a registered nuclear engine,er in California.
r
(..-
Commonwealth Edison Company, Project 6356-3, August 25, 1982 ;
C F B R A L* N & Co
.~
l l
4 -*
4-11 Attachment 3
< SYSTEMS SECTION HEAD MECHANICAL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT -
,,' , F M PATTERSON Pat has 30 years of engineering experience, all at I Braun. He is leader of the Systems Section of the Power Division l which is composed of the following groups - Mechanical, NVAC and Instrument & Controls. He is responsible for all engineering in the section which includes the complete design of nuclear and fossil power plant systems. This involves preparation of P&I flow diagrams, logic diagrams, hydraulic and thermal calculations, systems, e
equipment and pre-op sp'cifications, and equipment evaluation and selection. Involved is- the complete design including mechanical
, equipment room layouts, NVAC ductwork drawings, and fabrication f
/ specifications. Mr Patterson in responsible for administering the 4 three groups in his Section and providing technical guidance and -
I review of the work.
-Pat's other duties have involved the analysis of heat transfer and i fluid flow problems of all types. Also process design of such i apparatus as heat exchangers, condensers and feedwater heaters.
Mr Patterson has been in the Power Division since 1973. During this '
time he was responsible for mechanical and HVAC systems in the ,
Reactor Island for TVA's Hartsville and Phipps Bend Nuclear Power '
. stations. He also directed the activities on several other power projects. -
Before his assignment to the Power Division, Pat was a Principal l Engineer in the Engineering Division. Prior to that he was leader of.
the HVAC Group at Eraun.
Mr Patterson has a BSME from the University of California at Berkeley and MSME and Engineer in ME degrees from the University of Southern
~
California. He is a member of the IEEE Working Group for Unique Identification'of. Power Plant Systems and Components. He -is a
- registered professional mechanical engineer in California.
i i
! - j I
4
( '
l i -
l Commonwealth Edison Company, Project 6356-N, August 25, 1982 ,
l l c r a na r.x & co
4-12
.. PROJECT QUALITY CONTROL MANAGER .
L F KARNS Lee Karns has 39 years of experience including 31 years (
~
, with Braun.
'- Be is currently head of'the Site Quality Control Section of the l I
Quality Engineering Department. In this capacity, he is responsible for coordination of field jobsite inspection activities at various jobsites throughout the world. He maintains He liaison with jobsite is responsible for inspectors and home office engineering.
preparing Construction Inspection Plans for construction projects, review of drawings and-specifications, and establishment of inspection procedures and checklists to be used at the jobsite.
He coordinates with customer representatives in the preparation , '
- of the site inspection requirements. He is responsible for the field piping pressure test programs and the preparation of the i piping test diagrams that are used at the jobsites. ;
I I
For 18 years he was Chief Field Inspector. He was responsible for all jobsite construction inspection and quality control activities for field projects ranging to $150 million throughout the world.
He was responsible for all site inspection activities for projects in The Netherlands, Trinidad, Australia, and the Philippines. He participated in source inspection activities in Europe and other foreign countries during his overseas assignments. He is familiar '
with foreign codes and foreign work methods. At the jobsite, he '
was responsible for soil inspection, concrete control, concrete inspection, welding inspection including procedure and performance ;
qualificat' ion, Code pressure vessel fabrication and assembly ;
i inspection, inspection of piping fabrication and ersetion, piping '
system pressure testing, site metallurgy, inspection of complex i
materials handling systems, and boiler and furnace inspection. He '
l is particularly qualified in the various techniquesAt of the rite, nondestructive examination and code requirements.
he has be.en responsible for supervising a team of. inspection ,
I personnel that numbers up to 20 people.-
Prior to joining Braun, he was a source inspector for 8 years.in various metal manufacturing facilities se'rving'the petroleum
~
industry. He also supervised shop forces in the manufacture of f.
pressure vessels and the fabrication of structural steel.
Mr Karns is 61 years of age. He' received his education in l Mechanical Engineering at Purdue and Newark College of Engineering. i l
l l
t s -.
Commonwealth Edison Company, Project 6356-N, August 25,'1982 ,I C F B R A L* N & CO
5-1 Attachment 3 EXPERIENCE .
TVA STRIDE Braun has been involved in the design of HVAC systems for a 1220 MWe BWR for GE/TVA. The systems have been completely
, "N designed, procurement specifications written, and ductwork drawings
- issued. The majority of the NVAC equipment has been purchased and Braun has provided the review of supplier draw'.ngs and the resolution of supplier nonconformances and problems. j Some of the NVAC systems designed by Braun include. control room system, )
j standby gas treatment, diesel generator ventilation and other systems '
i similar to those installed at the Lasalle plant.
During the course of our efforts we have sent the HVAC engineer to the i construction site to assist in interpreting the design drawings. Sema
_- of the problems discusred with construction personnel include methods g
- of supporting and attaching ductwork materials used in fabrication of ductwork and the fabrication procedures.
ROCKY FLATS WEAPONS FACILITY Braun was involved in two major projects for this AEC nuclear weapons facility located near Denver, Colorado.
From 1967 to 1970, Braun designed the HVAC systems for a plutonium fabrication / machining operations office / cafeteria completer beryllium fabrication facility and the modification and/or extension of the t ,
I
- EVAC systems for over 50 of the e'xisting buildings at Rocky Flats.
The first project involved the design of HVAC system to control and !
i confine the spread of contamination. The systems controlled the l
pressure and air leakage between. areas of high potential for i contamination and those of low potential. Process supply and exhaust systems were designed to maintain an ambient temperature of 70' F and a moisture content of 0.6 grains. The room conditioning systems were of similar design with space conditions of 70' F and 6 grains, an extremely dry condition. The systems were fabricated from carbon steel, galvanized and stainless steel materials.
The second project consists of the design of NVAC systems fo'r a plutonium recovery and waste treatment facility and was accomplished from 1970 to 1981. The proces'es s within this' facility consisted of-wet chemical operations.
l In addition to the systems described above, Braun also designed a 1 large nitrogen recirculating system for a plutonium storage vault,
'- process scrubber exhausts and water spray and removal systems to
! collect firewater water sprayed on HEPA exhaust filters to prevent criticality conditions. _,
l During this 14 year period, Braun retained a full crew of construction l engineers and inspectors to oversee the contractors' operations. In sodition, Braun wrote detail system operating procedures, part'icipated in field startup tests and evaluated test results.
l '
i e ,
The majority of the systems are in operation at this time.
l '
~/
Commonwealth Edison Company, Project 6356-N, Augu t 25, 1982 ?
l C F BRAUN & CO
- p. . . - - .
. 5-2 EXPERIENCE Continued Attachment 3 LLL This was a plutonium research laboratory for the LLL in northern California. Many of the systems are similar to those
- ' designed for RF but the criteria was based upon the AEC " Minimum g
criteria for Plutonium handling facility." Braun assisted in the development of this criteria, which required more stringent design based upon safety and seismic concerns addressed in the document.
Braun also reviewed the supplier drawings for this project.
SUNNYVALE ADP and POWER HOUSE These facilities hous~ed the ADP equipment for the US satellite tracking program. The cooling load for this facility varied greatly due to irregular need for satellite s tracking. Braun designed a unique variable air volume system
\~
utilizing diverting dampers to satisfy this highly variable load.
The power house consisted of 11 turbine generators with wa'ste heat ;
boilers and steam absorption refrigerant un'its which were ventilated with axial fans.
OFFICES FACILITY, HOSPITALS, ETC Up to five years ago Braun had a ,
subsidiary, Kilpatrick & Co, which performed NVAC mechanical contractors and sheetmetal fabrication and erection for large commercial complexes in the Los Angeles area. The facilities were -
located on the Braun campus in Alhambra and were readily available to
, the design engineers. They were consulted in past matters detailing with sheetmetal fabrication and installation.
In addition, all A/E serv. ices for the Braun facilities at Alhambra
, and Murray Hill are accomplished with in-house personnel. Over the I past years Braun has designed and constructed four, seven to nine I story, office buildings in addition to other new and modification l work. - '
! Braun acts as their own construction managers for each of these facilities. .
PHARMACEUTICAL AND FOOD PROCESSING FACILITIES Braun has designed systems to satisfy FDA requirements for the ventilation of pharmaceutical and food processing facilities. These systems utilize
, galvanized and stainless ductwork, appropriately caulked and sealed, to confine these potential hazard materials.
~
i r-i ..
Commonwealth Edison Company, Project 6356-N, August 25, 1982 l!
C F B R A L* N & Co
o
~
ATTACHMENT 4 RESULTS OF SAMPLE ANALYSIS ASTM
- System Tensile Strength. KSI S:mple Material Removed System Weight % Calculated ASTM Number Type From Component l C S P Mn l Min. Min.
1 A36 VE Hanger 0.19 0.035 0.008 0.68 -
38 2 A527 VC Duct 0.07 0.027 0.005 0.38 N/A. N/A 3 A36 VC Hanger 0.15 0.038 0.006 0.69 65 58 4 A575 VC Stiffner 0.18 0.030 0.009 0.49 N/A N/A 5 A36 VE Hanger 0.23 0.038 0.012 0.68 -
58 6 A36 VE Hanger 0.21 0.026 0.006- 0.68 -
58 7 A527 VE Duct 0.07 0.031 0.006 0.35 N/A' N/A 8 A575 VE Stiffner 0.16 0.036 0.018 0.56 N/A N/A 9 A36 VC Hanger 0.18 0.029 0.006 _0.75 69 58 10 A36 VC Hanger 0.21 0.032 0.001 0.86 -
58 0.033 11 A36 VC Hanger 0.20 0.041 0.027 0.58 -
58 i 12 A527 VX Duct 0.06 0.019 0.005 0.41 N/A N/A 0.018 :
l'3 A36 VX Hanger 4 18 0.035 0.012 0.62 -
58 ,
! 14 A36 VX Hanger 0.16 0.036 0.006- 0.68 65 58 15 A36 VX Hanger 0.18 0.035 0.008 0.54 - 58 15 A36 VE Hanger 0.19 0.046 0.023 0.73 65 58 l 17 A36 VI Hanger 0.19 0.032 0.005 0.61 - 58 l
18 A575 VI companion 0.22 0.051 0.017 0.58 N/A N/A Flange 0.052 -
19 A575 VD Hanger 0.20 0.025 0.007 0.50 N/A N/A Call ASTM A575 Samples are specified to be Grade M1020, except sample 41 which was M1015.
s
\
. .x . -
ATTACHENT 4 RESULTS OF SAMPLI ANALYSIS .
N -.
- System x \ Tensile Streneth. EST Simple Material Renoved System ' _
Weight % Calculated ASIM Number Type Trom Corponent l C S P Mn l Min. Min.
20 A527 VD Duct 0.05 0.025 0.008 0.35 N/A .N/A 0.024 21 A575 VD Companion 0.23 0.026 0.005 0.52 N/A N/A Flange 22 A36 VD Hanger 0.19 0.038 0.008 0.60 - 58 23 A3'6 VD Hanger 0.19 0.036 0.009 0.68 6% 58 24 A575 VD Stiffner 0.20 0.026 0.008 0.61 hi s. N/A 0.19 25 A36 VY Hanger 0.20 0.042 0.009 0.64 - 58 26 A575 VY Stiffner 0.23 _0.031 0.008 0.61 N/A N/r.
27 A36 VY Hanger 0.17 0.037 0.007 0.54 .
- 38 0.18 28 A575 VY Stiffuer 0.21 0.029 0.008 0.58 N/A N /.*
29 A36 VY Hanger 0.15 0.048 0.035 0.72 - 58 0.035 30 A36 'VY Hanger 0.21 0.030 0.009 0.72 - 58 31 A527 VD Duct 0.08 0.02 0.006 0.42 N/A N/A 32 A527 VD Duct 0.'05 0.02 0.009 'O.30 N/A N/A 33 A527 VD Duct 0.06 0.02 0.006 0.43 N/A N/A 34 A527 VY Duct G.J6 0.03 0.007 0.28 N/A N/A l
35 A527 VY Duct 0.06 0.02 0.007 0.28 N/A N/A 36 A36 VY Hanger 0.17 0.04 0.006 0.71 66 58 0.18 l
l l
Call ASTM A575 Samples are specified to be Grade M1020, except sample 41 which was M1015.
l l '
l
~
ATTACHMENT 4 RESULTS OF SA$PLE ANALYSIS ASTM
- System Tensile Strenath. KSI Sample Material Removed System .
Weight % Calculated ASTM Number Type From Component I C S P Hn l Min. Min.
37 A527 VX Duct 0.08 0.03 0.008 0.32 N/A N/A 38 A307 VX Bolt -
0.03 0.011 0.69 145 60 39 A563 VX Nut 0.05 -
0.009 0.39 97** 68**
40 A575 VX Hanger 0.21 0.03 0.013 0.65 N/A N/A 0.62 41 A575 VX Stiffner 0.16 0.03 0.010 0.42 N/A N/A ,
42 A575 'IC Hanger 0.19 0.04 0.018 0.44 N/A N/A 43 A575 VC Stiffner 0.19 0.04 0.012 0.32 N/A N/A
~
44 A575 VC Companion 0.13 0.03 0.016 0.45 N/A N/A Flange 0.12 45 A527 VC Duct 0.04 0.05 0.009 0.32 N/A N/A 0.04 46 A527 VC ~ Companion 0.14 0.04 0.016 0.42 N/A N/A Flange 0.03
~
47- A527 VE Duct 0.09 0.02 0.006 0.40 N/A N/A 48 A527 VC Duct 0.07 0.03~ .0.011 0.33 -
N/A N/I 49 A575 VC Companion 0.14 0.03 0.017 0.45' N/A N/A Flange 50 A575 VC Companion 0.13 0.03 0.017 0.46 N/A N/A Flange ,
51 A307 VX Bolt -
0.02 0.021 - 77 60 52 A563 VX Nut 0.08 0.03 0.016 0.37 88** 68**
Call ASTM A575 samples are specified to be Grade M1020, except sample 41 which was M1015.
C* Proof load stress.
N
\
^_-- -
ATTACHMENT 4 RESULTS OF SAMPLE ANALYSIS
\ ASTM
- System Tensile Strength, KSI Simple Material Removed System k'eight 2 Calculated ASIN Number Type From Component lC S P MN l Min. Min. ,
53 A307 VX Bolt - 0.02 0.014 - 102 60 54 A563 VX Nut 0.09 0.02 0.009 0.50 87** 68**
55 A307 VR Bolt -
0.02 0.031 - 86 60 56 A563 VR Nut 0.11 0.01 0.026 0.34 107** 68**
h.
./
- p Call ASTM ~A575 Samples are specified to be Grade M1020, except sample 41 which was M1015.
C* Proof load stress.
~
. ~
CARGENT OLUNDY EN GIN E E R 5 cmeAco -
' Attachment 5 NRC REGION TII
'OUESTIONS ON HVAC SYSTEMS Question 1: The NRC tested 4 bolts which were 3/8 inch A307 Grade A. The ASTM hardness requirement is between 121 and 241 Brinell. One of the 4 bolts tested had a hardness of 287 Brinell. The chemical analysis was OK. The NRC's lab could not conduct elongation or tensile tests on a 3/8 inch bolt. What does the 287 Brinell hardness mean?
S&L Response: With increasing hardness yield and fracture strength increases and ductility decreases. Increased hard-ness is advantageous from a strength point of view.
Increased hardness also decreases ductility of the bolt materi'al. However, as'no impact loads are ,
expected on HVAC ductwork, this decreased ductility does not affect the safety of the bolts.
~
Hence, increased hardness is beneficial. ,
Atta*ched is a list of stresses on the bolts ,
obtained by conservative analysis of typical HVAC ductwork containing components (dampers, registers, grills , .etc. ) .
. "g e
me--,-- ,o - -- .- , . - - , , , -. , , - , . - - - -
7- . .
- w e . .
. SARGENTQLUNDY Att2 chm:nt 5 EN GIN E E RS CHICAGO , ,
Summary of findings for A307 bolts used in llVAC Duct. Compani33s.
N flange analysis. , -x Note: 1) The analysis was conservatively based on highest duct and duct component weights y -
x
- 2) Analysis was based on 3/8 inch bolts.
- 3) Yield stress for A307 is minimum 36000 psi.
Building - Reactor 1 and 2 Service Level: Emergency Duct Size Calculated Stress Duct Size Calculated (W X H inches) (ksi) (W X H inches) Stress (ksi) 10 X 6 8.0 30 X 14 7.54'4 10 X 6 10.0 30 X 20 8.323'-
~
12 X 8 9.6 32 X 20 4.633 12 X 10 10.7 36 X~30 9.92 12 X 12 9.6 40 X 20 9.102 14 X 10 10.6 __ 40 X 36 7.995 16 X 16 10.33 4 2 X 18 7.831 18 X 8 9.76 42 X 36 5.95 18 X 12 9.35 48 X 16 9.76 18 X 14 8.94 48 X 32 5.002-18 X 18 9.92 60 X 40 2.624
_2: 4 X 24. 10.05 72 X 60 5.084 24 X 18 8.98 96 X 40 6.44 24 X 20 7.18 26 x 12 8.16 26 X 14 9.184 26 X 20 9.963 9.512
+
28 X 14 28 X 20 9.061 d
1 '
L -
~ /
l 1
L
CARGENTO LUNDY AttachmInt 5 E N GIN E E R S
- CHICAGO Building - Auxi'liary " N Service Level: Emvergency Duct Size Calculated Stress (W X H inches) (ksi) 10 X 6 10.414 18 X 8 10.91 -
20 X 6 6.81 12 X 16 10.54 12 X 20 10.91 12 X 30 10.62 14 X 40 6.57 18 X 44 9.31 20 X 16 8.57 12 X 36 9.594 36 X 18 8.41 26 X 20 10.62 24 X 54 8.57 48 X 36 8.82 30 X 28 ~
. 7.75 30 X 38 9.23 22 X 18 7.71 28 X 70 9.512 72 X 72 5.54 40 9.8 70 9.23 e
S e
h e
O
_g , . / . .
CARGENT & LUNDY -
' . . ENGINEERS Attachment 5 .
CHIC AGO Building '- C btiainment Service' Level: Energency p- Duct Size Calculated Stress (W X H inches) (ksi) 12 X 24 8.16-32 X 10 8.1-30 X 32 , 8.364 l -
18 p 9.27 I
=
- 4 9
G e
G O
I l =
e-
e KoggR (da lM1(
%N 3,1 Galv a l'aed DecesorkI
. j g' Wisw2e MQg; Xatu!al Coating hb Specification lesissation_.
Neterialfrpt !! e_
i Xster!41 A3N W M 015 lbauseand1fthter W A526 G90
$ hest Galvestaed Stevi 14 + s and bsn ter 2 A315, ,
. . . Itiff taeng CtrhaScael, 2-1/2" x 21!!" x 1/f sad saller "
Ctsie M4620_ M All)
Y*ilar. gen W Ictdipped i ASt?! O lepoorts Calvaised 3* x 3' x 1/4" an! latter
.J.,i6lts All _._
MM _. M A153, .
Galenstred Stest ASTM A152 Cla:ia D, n ~. v -
CalvsstedSteel All _
Uvets Camrdal E...
Sheetf,ttai GdvaiW Steel 111 LSW 1543 Coating fiE'.Ii ._ R .
Screse y ma u.. we **ts ...' - - - - - - - -
s,.n.a T.6 > s 4......
,,,,6 ,a m .,,,4 litt ua -
i.
Y.? ,.r., & g.
3.1 Stainless 6 tee m etect u EM.M&.lw Coeting c- m. -
listerial '-" "
m liar - . :-. Specifiestisi Desigutim Materisi listerial fype l
l k,1gotcq'#ih., emi b
i telled kaasled and 78T T.,
('
All AS3 A161 fickledwith Si.ut SStype316 cold reduc- . . . .
i l
1 ties h s M*N 15M A575, Stiftecers, Carboo Real, 2-1/2" a 2 2" t 1/6" and smaller ,
- Crste X-1020 M A12) gngersand k; dipped .
Cala:izd P x P s 1/4" ed latter MG .
.. $.mrts I
N: '
ialts, Livets
$! Type 316 All 15 3 A1 0 M 'J -
, and51uellsseos -
krdare esposed sg.g~ , '
l toalntrem ASW1107 M A13), 4~ .g~ - x All other bolts GalvaitedSteel All All other tivets Galvanized Stael All' W A152 __ ClassD. , . . ,
MGd, ihV
' ASB A!44 Consertial All Mher acttvs GaltAlzed $tsel. A(1 ,
Cutier
! I '. 7 pf,;4.,.,pya y F e "r
.m,
' !V Z;dO
=
a f4g iMc l i.y .
cywe syssi, He afeys is a l,it .4 asettemi SP8c'Dc'b'ar vret h't Asi.t.f Ikitie af 144 La f.#t #$est. ! yw Au// A.vg a,f peif,e: d..
Iyv.-*,,
- t tac..tadma. .
i 503). $
i -
. . - . e.
b $ * '. y Y y s
- g *
( Y?fh. *'. ,-
'M ^'.', 'd. $b~, ',. _,
..c
. . .,.{ ..s , . . 3 .Y '
0 '* ,
- 4 .' . ' . a gg g
. T-l .
- I. .s.
. . k , .Y. '*5. y $. .( (*,..'
8
.se , ,
~~ h.- .:{: -
,e '= ~
R."g..~.........,..
.' *N
'A % J- . s; ,
- g ,, ....
.* -'-- .
- y;% t~
.',f..*.
- . . - . h
. _ _ . _ . _ __