ML20023D191
| ML20023D191 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | LaSalle, 05000000 |
| Issue date: | 10/21/1982 |
| From: | SARGENT & LUNDY, INC. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20023A480 | List:
|
| References | |
| FOIA-82-366 PI-LS-42, NUDOCS 8305190357 | |
| Download: ML20023D191 (9) | |
Text
<
,c SARGENT&LUNDY INSTRUCTION PI LS-42 i
PROJECT INSTRUCTION
'g***,g*ff REV. 0 l
Client COMMONWEALTH _ EDISON COMPANY LASALLE COUNTY STATION' Project No1 4266/4267-00 Project J
l REVIEW OF QC DOCUMENTATION FOR LASALLE COUNTY STATION-UNITS 1 AND 2 l
@ Safety-Related i O Non-Sarety-Relatee Reviewed by:
Approved by:
l Rev.
Date Sr. Elect.
Sr. SIruct.
QA Project Project Engr.
Project Engr.
Coordinator Manager n
fkhk_Wb. $ YA 0$M Y
J 0
10-21-92 W
I i
i l
l i
l i
2 1
For informan an Only o
i 8
5 2
l P5ge 1 of6 8305190357 830311 u
-~y-v-w v-3-,
,7 e4 em--m--
.,,-m
.-------------1--
I SARGENT?4LUNDY INSTRUCTION PI LS-42 iWOJr.CT
- m. L'wC'rION
. REY.
0 e
1.0 Purpose l
The purpose of this document is to assign responsibility, direction and authority for the review of QC documentation as referenced in Sargent & Lundy (S&L) Quality Assurance Manual Procedure GQ-3.09.
l 2.0 pefinitions None.
c ll 3.0 Procedures (Onsite, Offsite) i 3.1 Offsite Procedures i
S&L QC Form 1037 (copy attached) is used to distribute
{
procedures received from offsite contractors.. For external distribution, the appropriate Commonwealth Edison f
distribution list shall be employed.
The appropriate l
contractor shall be included.
Internal distribution is i
the responsibility of the Quality Control C.oordinator (OCC).
I The QC-1037 Form is a two-part form.
The first page
{
includes the specification number, special transmittal J
letter identification, etc.
This page should be retained by the reviewer and the second page, which is.the actual comments or acceptance page, shall.be returned in the prescribed time stated on the form to the' Qual'ity Control' Coordinator identified on the second'page.
The responsibility for resolving pertinent comments is the. respo'nsibility *of the Qua'lity Control' Coordinator.
The Quality Control Coordinator has the authority to override trivial, non-pertinent comments from the reviewer (s).
After all
}[
comments have beencollected, or that the time allocated j
for the review (which is stated on the form) has run out, the Quality Control Coordinator shall respond to the q
contractor in writing with copies to the personnel identified in the CECO distribution list and the appropriate S&L personnel.
All procedures shall be stamped with the 3],,
appropriate Status 1, 2,
3 or 4 stamp.
t The above outline amplifies the requirements of the CECO u
a OA program.
2 For Information Only l
2 of 6
\\
Page
l'ROJECT l SARGENT&LUNDY INSTRUCTION PI LS-42 C.
, INSTRUCTION E
REV.
0
'N
\\.2 Onsite Procedures 3
The methodology for tracking the onsite contractor procedures emanates from the Commonwealth Edison Company Quality Assurance group in conformance with the CECO QA program.
The procedures as received from CECO QA are processed via the QC Form 1037.
The Quality Control Coordinator has the responsibility of distributing onsite l
contractors procedures within the S&L organization as well as the responsibility for resolving comments raised by the CECO Project Engineering and/o,r SNED and the S&L commentors.
After all comments have been received, a 1
i letter is generated by the Quality Control Coordinator to the CECO site QA Superintendent advising him of the comments or acceptance.
I 3.3 Offsite Delinquent Suppliers The Quality Control Coordinator has the authority and I
responsibility for ensuring _that all contractor procedures I
applicable to each contract, safety or non-safety related,
.have been received, reviewed and ultimately accepted.
In accordance with specification requirements all procedures are to be submitted to Sargent & Lundy within.
six weeks after award of contract.
The S&L Quality Control Coordinator in conjunction with both CECO and S&L l
Engineering will ascertain what procedures shall be sub-l mitted.
If the contactor does not submit the required i
procedures, the Quality Control Coordinator shall contact
~
him by letter.
If no response is given by the contractor i
i
.in a timely fashion, the S&L Quality Control Coordinator
'will again contact the contractor by -letter.
This letter.
shall contain the sentence "By copy'of this letter we are requestihg that CECO expedite th.is matter".
l
., 1 l
.t k
~
3.4 A list of all procedures shall be maintained by the S&L Quality Control Division (QCD) and distributed periodically 2
to CECO per the appropriate distribution list for its review and use.
The responsibility and authority for d
developmen.t and distribution of this procedure list lies
,!J with the S&L Quality Control Coordinator.
- 5. ?
w For Information only I
3 of 0 l
Page l
l
LS-42 PROJECT SARGENTMUNDY INSTRUCTION P,f-INSTIGJCTION L. '
REV.
0 4.0 Quality Cohtrol Documentation Lists 4.1 The responsibility and authority for development and imple-mentation of the Quality Control Documentation Lists lies directly with the S&L Quality Control Coordinator.
4.2 The Quality Control Documentation List is a two-part list (see sample attached).
The first part deals with the Technical Administrative Requirements, Quality Assurance Program, Quality Control Procedures, Inspection Point Program, Seismic Reports, Environmental Qualification Reports, Stress Reports, Instruction Manuals, etc.
The second portion of the list deals with the Quality require-ments for each equipment number.
4.3 The documents used to develop each list are:
The Sargent &
Lundy Specification, the CECO Purchase Order, the S&L Standards and the appropriate state and federal codes, i
- l l
4.4 A Quality Control Documentation List shall be developed I
for each offsite safety and non-safety related specifica-tion and.. CECO non-specification purchase orders.
The l
)
development and implementation of onsite Quality Control f
Documentation Lists are the responsibility of the
(
Commonwealth Edison Company Quality Assurance group.
' 4. 5 Each. completed Quality Control Documentation List shall j
be' sent to CECO Project Engideering and/or SNED for review i
and acceptance.
Copies of the Quality Control Documenta-i tion List shall be sent to the LaSalle County Construction
,,l Superintendent, CECO' Site-QA, CECO Operating QA, CECO
'4 Expediting and S&L internal distribution.
1 E '. 4. 6 Certain sections under the_ Technical Administrative Require-
- [
ments are governed and-controlled by Sargent & Lundy 1
Project Instruction PI-LS-34.
.I 5.0 Quality Control Documentation Review W
C 5.1 All safety related and non-safety related Quality Centrol p
documentation shall be submitted to the S&L Quality Control Division.
(This.*does not apply to onsite contractor c;,j Quality Control documentation.)
l l
For Information only Page 4 of 6
l i
PROJECT SARGENT&l.IlNDY reusesse.
INSTI,3CTION REV. 0 c
.c.oo l
5.2 The responsibility for ascertaining the corre.ctness-and completeness of all O'a)ity Control documentation is the u
ultimate responsiblity of the S&L QC.
The physical review of Quality Control documentation is the responsibility of the Quality control Division Technical
" Assistants (TA).
The generic S&L QCD procedure for the review of contractor test and inspection documentation i
is covered in the S&L QCD procedures manual procedure g
OCP-8.4.
5.3 After the Quality Control documentation package has been reviewed and accepted by the Technical Assistant, the total package is stamped with the Status 1 stamp, a modified document list (or index) is included to assist the client as to what documentation is included, a page count is made and included in the transmittal letter and attachments to the CECO site Quality Assurance group for their review and use.
5.4 If certain aspects of a documentation package are unacceptable, the contractor is notified in writing and thb documentation package is put on hold until resolution of the unacceptance.
If the contractor does not respond in a timely fashion then the client (CECO) is requested to I
expedite the~ resolution of the problem.
If all else I
fails, the QCC shall notify CECO's PE or SNED Engineering i
. Manager and requests that either the errant contractor
[
be required to have a meeting at CECO or S&L, or'that representative (s) of S&L go to the errant contractor to j
resolve the unacceptable condition.-
'l Jl6.0 Review of Radiographic Film El The review and processing of radiographic film and
.'g 6.1 associated documents follows the parameters of S&L
.Il Quality Control Procedure QCP-8.4.1 with the exception
- j that the QC Form 1004 is not used.
x
.h 6.2 The reader sheets and associated documents are appropriately stamped and a letter transmitting these documents and their disposition shallibe sent to the CECO site QA g;:i Superintendent.
The contractor shall be notified of the disposition.
for Information On17
{
Page 5 of
~
LS-42 i
eno.ncr SARGENTELUNDY INSTRUCTION PI-I M 3d'.CT10N m
REV. 0 e
~.
6.3 There are several contracts whereby the contractor has requested that all radiographs be retained by him.
After review by qualified S&L reviewers, the radiographic film shall be returned to the Contractor for archival storage.
A letter giving the disposition of these radio-graphic films shall be sent to CECO site QA Superintendent.
7.0 Documents and Documentation Control L 7.1 The procedure for document control is covered in S&L
[
Quality Control Procedures Manual Procedure QCP-7.1.
I l,' 8.0 Forms t
l t 8.1 QC Form 1037.
f I
- 9. 0 '
References S&L Quality Control P'ocedures Manual-Procedure QCP-7.1.
r o.1 f
S&L Quality Control Procedures Manual-Procedure QCP-8.4.
I i 9.2 L
[9.3 S&L Quality Control Procedures Manual-Procedure QCP-8.4.1.
9.4 S&L Quality Assurance Manual-Procedure GQ-3.09.
~!
! 9.5 FI-LS-34, " Control of Contracto.rs Technical Data D.ocu-l ments".
g,
- Jl9.6 S&L-3024-Project Scope of Work.
Ci 9.7 S&L QC Documentation Lists (Bingo Sheets).
1
9.9 CECO Purchase Orders.
L 8 9.10 S&L Specifications.
~
fi Codes and Standards.
.[9.11 l10.0 3
Flow Chart For Information Only
'l None.
Page g of 0 4
f
~
SARGENT & LUNDY
' L?dL" "
- Date Project No.
sN Page 1
of s
Commonwealth Edison Company M aSalle County Station - Units 1 & 2 x
/
S&L Specification No.
I l
Safety Related [
]
Non-Saiety Related i
[
Reference:
t l
~
Attached for your comm info.ation e copies of the following vendor documents (see ge Please return the second ge of t letter, marked at the bottom to indicate the es ts of our revie We will appreciate receiving your comments wit 'n n day of the dat of this transmittal.
If no comments are r iv within the prescribed tim,e limit, we e
n will assume you have n. coma nts and will proceed accozidingly
/
Your y,tr 1 g'
I l
l
/
J by l
E.
. Kurtz Supervisor, Proje t Section Quality Contro
'D' vision Enclosures Comments transmitted to S&L on Distribution:
For Information Only
\\
PI-LS-42 Rev. 0 QC Form 1037
~
CARGENTE2LUNDY EN GIN EE RS CHICAGO Date Project No.
~'
Reference:
'N Specification No.
Page of Pages REV[
COMMENTS j
VENDOR DOCUMENT
/
N /
./
N /
c
\\
/
N-x s
N s
l
\\ \\..
b s
~
KN N.
x
\\T N
(N
\\
\\ /N
\\
l r
X N
/
n\\
~
/
/
s Sargent & i, undy Engineers i
Attention:
E.
R.
Kurtz - 10C04 Gentlemen:
We acknowledge receipt of the above listed documents and have taken the action indicated below:
We have comments as marked (in block marked " Comments" or separate _
letter).
Items commented'upon are indicated by a check mark.
l We have no comments on these documents.
For Information Only 1
Yours very truly, CC Form 1037A Signature i
PI-LS-42, Rev. O Date i
=...
==.
=a.--.--.
.r g
[
PI-LS-42 I
(
Rev. 0 SAFE'IT RELATED LaSalle County Station - Units 1/2 Issued for Use April 17.197R Quality Control Documentation' List Revised August 11, 1979 (ERK)
X - Required Sargent & Lundy Specification J-2552-01 Revised June 12. 1980__ _(ERK) 0 - Not Required Commonwealth Edison Company P.O. 216253 Revised August 12 l_980 (ERK)
~
A - Received Reviewed and Electrical Penetrations
[~ Revised October 14, 1981 (JWT) t Sent tu the Site Cont ation' 3
TECilNICAL ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS E iipment Number 1
2 3
4 5
6 7_ 8 9
10 11 12 B3 -S301 A
A A
A A
A 0
A S-1 E-1 SR/DR-1 A
S&L(, CECO B1 S102 A
A A
A A
A 0
A S-1 E-l SP/ Dl:-)
-A Al" iE A
A A
A A
A 0
A S-1 E-1 SR/DR-1 A
X Quality Assurance Program
,A 37E A
A A
A A
A 0
A S-1 E-1 SR/DR-1.
A I"38 E f
A A
A A
A 0
A S-l' E-1 SR/DR-1 A
X Quality Control Procedures A
[A_j Al"
/
A A
A A
A 0
A S-1 E-1 SR/DR-1 A
'~
396E \\
/ A A
A A
A A
0 A
S-1 E-1 SR/DR-1 A
X Inspection Point,, Program A 1 A_j IV97E V
A A
A A
A A
0 A
S-1 E-1 S R/ DR-1 A
IN')HE -/\\
A A
A A
A A
0 A
S-1 E-1_ SR/ Dit-1 A
X Scismic Reports A
IX99Ef A
A A
A A
0 A
S-1 E-1 SR/DR-1 A
IN94R L#T A
A A
0 A
S-1 E-1 SR/DR-1 A
(_X_j Stress Reports
(_A_j (_A_j IN95E 7
A E T $
A 0
A S-1 E-1 Sn/DE-1 A
C51-S101 T
A A
A 4 A
0 A
S-1 E-1 SR/HR-1 A
X Environmental Qualifications Q
c51-S 302 A
A A
A g 0
A S-1 E-1 SR/DR-1 A
A A
A S-1 E-1 SM/DR-1 A
C51-S303 A p X
IEEE-344 eg A
'C51-S 304 A
A A
A O_
A_ S-1 E-1 SR/DR-1 A
CII-S301
'A A
A A
0 A
S-1 E-1 SR/DR-1 A
$ l A l(Conax p
A 4p
_A S-1 E-1 SR/DR-1 A
X Instruction Manuals Cll-S302 A
A_ p g
Q 11)
Cll-S303 A g A-A A
A 0
A gl E-1 SR/DR-1 A
Cll-S304 A'
A A
A A
A 0 g S-1 E-1 SR/DR-1 A
s DICTIONARY T-1 A
A A
A A -&8 A
S-1 E-1 A
T-2 A
A A
A A
A 0
A S-1 E-1 A
N A
1.
ASME Code Data. Report (N-2) g IINXXE
_t,f_1_g,A_ A_ J L 4 l
2.
Certified Material Test Reports Is
\\
3.
Production Test Reports g
8.
Items To Be Retained at Conax:
10.
arg t & Lundy "E" Letter 4.
Table of Katerials p.
A.
Wclder Certificates b tributing Environmental
+
5.
NDE Test Results, lielium Leak & PMunatic B.
NDE Qualifications Qualifications Testing C.
Shop Travelers 11.
Sargent & Lundy "SR/DR" Letter.
6.
Certificate of Conformance D.
Name Plate Drawing Distributing Stress / Design 7.
Discrepancy Reports (if applicable) 9.
Sargent & Lundy "S" Letter Reports Distributing Seismic Ecports 12.
Instruction Manuals t
.