|
---|
Category:LEGAL TRANSCRIPTS & ORDERS & PLEADINGS
MONTHYEARML20153G3141998-06-29029 June 1998 Transcript of 980629 Public Meeting Re Peach Bottom Unit 1, Decommissioning Status in Delta,Pa.Pp 1-65.Reporter Certificate Encl ML20249B9981998-06-22022 June 1998 Exemption from Requirements of 10CFR70.24 Re Criticality Accident Requirements. Exemption Authorized ML20247M8801998-05-19019 May 1998 Confirmatory Order Modifying Licenses Effective Immediately. PECO Energy Co Shall Complete Final Implementation of Thermo-Lag 330-1 Fire Barrier Corrective Actions at Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station,Units 2 & 3 ML20247L8591998-05-19019 May 1998 Confirmatory Order Modifying Licenses Effective Immediately Re Thermo-Lag 330-1 Fire Barrier Sys ML20216G0321998-03-0404 March 1998 Comment Re Draft RG DG-1071, Std Format & Content for Post- Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Rept. Recommends That Draft RG Be Revised to Accommodate Situations Similar to That Described for Unit 1 ML20203A1701998-01-30030 January 1998 Exemption from Requirements of 10CFR70.24 for Limerick Generating Station,Unit 1 ML20198J0931997-12-18018 December 1997 Order Approving Application Re Merger Between Atlantic Energy Inc,& Delmarva Power & Light Co ML20151L5181997-08-0505 August 1997 Order Prohibiting Involvement in NRC Licensed Activities (Effective Immediately) Re SL Nevin Deliberately Falsifying Records of RECW Sample Documentation on 960207 ML20151L3671997-08-0505 August 1997 Order Prohibiting Involvement in NRC Licensed Activities (Effective Immediately).Orders That SA Blacklock Prohibited from Engaging in Activities Licensed by NRC for 5 Yrs from Date of Order ML20203H6891997-06-0202 June 1997 Transcript of 970602 Enforcement Conference in King of Prussia,Pa ML20113C6631996-06-24024 June 1996 Comments on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Financial Assurance Requirements for Decommissioning Nuclear Power Reactors ML20115H7061996-06-0404 June 1996 Submits Addl Info to Support Petition for Rulemaking PRM-72-3 Re Amend to SAR ML20083N3971995-04-26026 April 1995 Comment Supporting Proposed GL, Pressure Locking & Thermal Binding of Safety-Related Power-Operated Gate Valves ML20081B3811995-03-0101 March 1995 Comment Supporting Proposed Suppl 5 to GL 88-20, IPEEE for Severe Accident Vulnerabilities ML20078P9331994-12-0707 December 1994 Exemption Granted from Requirements of 10CFR73.55 Re Returning of Picture Badges Upon Exit from Protected Area Such That Individuals Not Employed by Licensee May Take Picture Badges Offsite ML20071H0521994-07-0505 July 1994 Exemption from Application of 10CFR50,App J,Sections III.D.2(a) & III.D.3,extending Testing Intervals to Allow Testing to Be Performed During Unit 2 Cycle 10 Refueling Outage ML20058K7381993-12-0303 December 1993 Memorandum & Order CLI-93-25.* Commission Denies State of Nj Petition for Leave to Intervene & Request for Adjudicatory Hearing Filed on 931008.W/Certificate of Svc.Served on 931203 ML20059L3201993-11-24024 November 1993 Exemption from Training Requirements of 10CFR50.120 Re Establishment,Implementation & Maintenance of Training Program ML20059B0301993-10-22022 October 1993 NRC Staff Response to Commission Questions Posed W/Respect to State of New Jersey Petition for Leave to Intervene & Request for Hearing.* Denies Petition to Intervene & Request for Hearing.W/Certificate of Svc & Notice of Appearance ML20059B1111993-10-20020 October 1993 Philadelphia Electric Co Response to NRC 931014 Order.* State Failed to Demonstrate Entitlement to Hearing to Challenge Util Amend to Permit Util to Receive Shoreham Fuel ML20057G2141993-10-14014 October 1993 Order.* Requests for Simultaneous Responses,Not to Exceed 10 Pages to Be Filed by State,Peco & Lipa & Served on Other Specified Responders by 931020.NRC May File by 931022. W/Certificate of Svc.Served on 931014 ML20059A4581993-10-14014 October 1993 Order Requesting Answers to Two Questions Re State of Nj Request for Immediate Action by NRC or Alternatively, Petition for Leave to Intervene & Request for Hearing. Operations Plans for Marine Transportation Withheld ML20059B1291993-09-14014 September 1993 Affidavit of Jh Freeman.* Discusses Transfer of Slightly Used Nuclear Fuel from Shoreham Nuclear Power Station to Limerick Generating Station.W/Certificate of Svc & Notice of Appearance ML20045D8121993-06-14014 June 1993 Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 54 Re FSAR Update Submittals. ML20126F2721992-12-21021 December 1992 Comment Endorsing Positions & Comments of NUMARC & BWROG Re Draft GL, Augmented Inservice Insp Requirments for Mark I & Mark II Steel Containments,Refueling Cavities & Associated Drainage Sys ML20062C6561990-10-22022 October 1990 Affidavit Requesting Withholding of Summary Rept on Evaluation of Recirculation Nozzle to Safe End Weld Indication & Proposed Disposition to Permit Unit 1 Cycle 4 Operation, from Public Disclosure,Per 10CFR2.790 ELV-01267, Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR71 Re Compatibility of Pu Air Transport Regulations W/Iaea Stds.Supports EEI-UWASTE/NUMARC Comments to Be Provided to NRC by 9002091990-02-0707 February 1990 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR71 Re Compatibility of Pu Air Transport Regulations W/Iaea Stds.Supports EEI-UWASTE/NUMARC Comments to Be Provided to NRC by 900209 ML20011E4861990-02-0707 February 1990 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR71 Re Compatibility of Pu Air Transport Regulations W/Iaea Stds.Supports EEI-UWASTE/NUMARC Comments to Be Provided to NRC by 900209 ML20248D2831989-09-28028 September 1989 Notice of Appearance.* Advises That Author Will Enter Appearance in Proceeding on Behalf of Nrc.W/Certificate of Svc ML20247Q2661989-09-26026 September 1989 Establishment of Aslb.* Board Will Comprise of Mb Margulies, Chairman & Oh Paris & Fj Shon,Members.W/Certificate of Svc. Served on 890926 B13367, Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR30,40,50,60,70,72 & 150 Re Preserving Free Flow of Info to Commission.Nrc Made Wise Choice to Not Impose Any Obligation on Private Parties to Include Affirmative Statement in Employment Agreements1989-09-20020 September 1989 Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR30,40,50,60,70,72 & 150 Re Preserving Free Flow of Info to Commission.Nrc Made Wise Choice to Not Impose Any Obligation on Private Parties to Include Affirmative Statement in Employment Agreements ML20248C8751989-09-13013 September 1989 Response to Order Modifying Licenses & Order to Show Cause Why Licenses Should Not Be Revoked.* Requests Hearing on Issues,Including Funds for Equipment.Supporting Info Encl ML20246J4521989-08-30030 August 1989 Memorandum & Order (Terminating Proceeding).* Terminates Proceeding Per Settlement Agreement Between Limerick Ecology Action,Inc & Licensee.W/Certificate of Svc.Served on 890831 ML20246F0121989-08-25025 August 1989 Memorandum & Order CLI-89-17.* Staff Authorizes Issuance of Full Power License to Licensee to Operate Unit 2 After Requisite Safety Findings Under 10CFR50.57 Completed. W/Certificate of Svc ML20246F1011989-08-25025 August 1989 Joint Motion for Termination of Proceedings.* Board Moved to Accept Encl Settlement Agreement,Dismiss Limerick Ecology Action,Inc (Lea) Contention W/Prejudice,Dismiss Lea as Party to Proceeding & Terminate Proceeding ML20246F1471989-08-25025 August 1989 Settlement Agreement.* Certificate of Svc Encl ML20246E8351989-08-24024 August 1989 Second Supplemental Response of Intervenor Limerick Ecology Action,Inc to Memorandum & Order of Commission & Memorandum & Order of 890807.* W/Certificate of Svc ML20246E3431989-08-22022 August 1989 Opposition of Intervenor Limerick Ecology Action,Inc to Motion by Licensee Philadelphia Electric Co to Set Schedule for Discovery & Hearing.* Requests That Schedule Be Replaced W/More Reasonable Schedule,As Proposed.W/Certificate of Svc ML20246C0271989-08-18018 August 1989 Notice of Appointment of Adjudicatory Employee.* Informs That D Nash Appointed as Commission Adjudicatory Employee to Advise Commission on Issues in Proceeding.W/Certificate of Svc.Served on 890818 ML20246C7141989-08-18018 August 1989 Order to Show Cause Why CPs CPEP-1 & CPEP-2 Should Not Be Revoked & Requiring Licensee to Notify Commission at Least 30 Days Before Taking Possession of Any Classified Equipment ML20246B7721989-08-17017 August 1989 Correction of Memorandum & Order of 890815.* Advises That Refs to 49CFR2.730(c) on Page 1 & 49CFR2.710 & 49CFR2.711 on Page 2 Should Be Corrected to Read as 10CFR2.730(c),2.710 & 2.711,respectively.W/Certificate of Svc.Served on 890818 ML20246D7411989-08-17017 August 1989 Transcript of 890817 Meeting in Rockville,Md Re Discussion of Full Power OL for Facility.Pp 1-58.Supporting Documentation Encl ML20246B7751989-08-16016 August 1989 Memorandum & Order.* Denies Rl Anthony 890623 Request for Hearing for Intervention in Remand Proceeding & for Stay of Low Power Authorization.W/Certificate of Svc.Served on 890816 ML20246B7571989-08-16016 August 1989 Order Responding to Limerick Ecology Action Motion for Reconsideration.* Denies Motion to Reconsider,Stay,Suspend or Revoke 890707 Order on Basis That Order Appropriate.W/ Certificate of Svc.Served on 890816.Re-served on 890818 ML20246B7931989-08-15015 August 1989 Memorandum & Order (Request for Expedited Answer).* Denies Licensee 890811 Request for Expedited Answer from NRC & Limerick Ecology Action on Basis That Request Lacks Good Cause.W/Certificate of Svc.Served on 890816 ML20245H8491989-08-14014 August 1989 Notice of Change of Address.* Advises of Council Change of Address for Svc of Documents ML20245H8061989-08-14014 August 1989 Supplemental Response of Intervenor Limerick Ecology Action, Inc to Memorandum & Order of Commission & to Memorandum & Order of 890807.* Requests Further Extension of Time in Which to Reply.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20245H5991989-08-11011 August 1989 Memorandum & Order (Terminating Proceeding).* Dismisses Graterford Inmates Contention Re Adequacy of Training for Drivers Responsible for Evacuating Graterford & Terminates Proceeding.Certificate of Svc Encl.Served on 890814 ML20245H7341989-08-10010 August 1989 Motion by Licensee Philadelphia Electric Co to Set Schedule for Discovery & Hearing & Request for Expedited Answer to This Motion.* Divergence in Positions of Respective Parties Emphasizes Need to Conclude Proceeding.W/Certificate of Svc ML20245F7341989-08-0909 August 1989 NRC Staff Response to Commission Memorandum & Order of 890807.* Advises That NRC Will Provide Comments on Limerick Ecology Action 890814 Filing Prior to Commission Meeting Scheduled for 890817.W/Certificate of Svc 1998-06-29
[Table view] Category:PUBLIC COMMENTS ON PROPOSED RULES & PETITIONS FOR
MONTHYEARML20216G0321998-03-0404 March 1998 Comment Re Draft RG DG-1071, Std Format & Content for Post- Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Rept. Recommends That Draft RG Be Revised to Accommodate Situations Similar to That Described for Unit 1 ML20113C6631996-06-24024 June 1996 Comments on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Financial Assurance Requirements for Decommissioning Nuclear Power Reactors ML20115H7061996-06-0404 June 1996 Submits Addl Info to Support Petition for Rulemaking PRM-72-3 Re Amend to SAR ML20083N3971995-04-26026 April 1995 Comment Supporting Proposed GL, Pressure Locking & Thermal Binding of Safety-Related Power-Operated Gate Valves ML20081B3811995-03-0101 March 1995 Comment Supporting Proposed Suppl 5 to GL 88-20, IPEEE for Severe Accident Vulnerabilities ML20045D8121993-06-14014 June 1993 Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 54 Re FSAR Update Submittals. ML20126F2721992-12-21021 December 1992 Comment Endorsing Positions & Comments of NUMARC & BWROG Re Draft GL, Augmented Inservice Insp Requirments for Mark I & Mark II Steel Containments,Refueling Cavities & Associated Drainage Sys ELV-01267, Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR71 Re Compatibility of Pu Air Transport Regulations W/Iaea Stds.Supports EEI-UWASTE/NUMARC Comments to Be Provided to NRC by 9002091990-02-0707 February 1990 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR71 Re Compatibility of Pu Air Transport Regulations W/Iaea Stds.Supports EEI-UWASTE/NUMARC Comments to Be Provided to NRC by 900209 ML20011E4861990-02-0707 February 1990 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR71 Re Compatibility of Pu Air Transport Regulations W/Iaea Stds.Supports EEI-UWASTE/NUMARC Comments to Be Provided to NRC by 900209 B13367, Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR30,40,50,60,70,72 & 150 Re Preserving Free Flow of Info to Commission.Nrc Made Wise Choice to Not Impose Any Obligation on Private Parties to Include Affirmative Statement in Employment Agreements1989-09-20020 September 1989 Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR30,40,50,60,70,72 & 150 Re Preserving Free Flow of Info to Commission.Nrc Made Wise Choice to Not Impose Any Obligation on Private Parties to Include Affirmative Statement in Employment Agreements ML20245G0721989-08-0303 August 1989 Comment on Draft Reg Guide, Assuring Availability of Funds for Decommissioning Nuclear Reactors. Recommends That NRC Recommendation on Trust Agreement Wording Be Deleted or NRC Should Grandfather Existing Trusts Such as for Plants ML20248B6201989-08-0202 August 1989 Comments on Draft Reg Guide, Assuring Availability of Funds for Decommissioning Nuclear Reactors. NRC Should Permit Use of Potential Tax Refund as Source of Decommissioning Funds ELV-00674, Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50,72 & 170 Re Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel in NRC-Approved Storage Casks at Nuclear Power Reactor Sites. 10CFR72.6(c) Should Be Revised to Provide for Storage W/O ISFSI Requirement1989-07-0707 July 1989 Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50,72 & 170 Re Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel in NRC-Approved Storage Casks at Nuclear Power Reactor Sites. 10CFR72.6(c) Should Be Revised to Provide for Storage W/O ISFSI Requirement ELV-00679, Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Acceptance of Products Purchased for Use in Nuclear Power Plant Structures,Sys & Components. Agrees W/Numarc Comments Provided to NRC on 8906261989-07-0505 July 1989 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Acceptance of Products Purchased for Use in Nuclear Power Plant Structures,Sys & Components. Agrees W/Numarc Comments Provided to NRC on 890626 ML20246K4801989-07-0505 July 1989 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Acceptance of Products Purchased for Use in Nuclear Power Plant Structures,Sys & Components ML20246D8811989-06-30030 June 1989 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Acceptance of Products Purchased for Use in Nuclear Power Plant Structures,Sys & Components ML20245D2481989-06-16016 June 1989 Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR50,72 & 170 Re Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel in NRC-Approved Storage Casks at Nuclear Power Reactor Sites. NRC Must Consider Provision in Rule to Permit Indiscriminate Storage of Spent Fuel at Reactors ML20246Q2971989-05-15015 May 1989 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants ML20245J0191989-04-14014 April 1989 Comment Re Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants ML20244B3241989-04-10010 April 1989 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants ML20247A2971989-04-0404 April 1989 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants B13113, Comments on Proposed Rev 3 to Reg Guide 1.9, Selection, Design,Qualification,Testing & Reliability of Diesel Generator Units Used as Onsite Electric Power Sys at Nuclear Power Plants. Reg Guide Does Not Provide Flexibility1989-03-0808 March 1989 Comments on Proposed Rev 3 to Reg Guide 1.9, Selection, Design,Qualification,Testing & Reliability of Diesel Generator Units Used as Onsite Electric Power Sys at Nuclear Power Plants. Reg Guide Does Not Provide Flexibility ML20246N9471989-03-0808 March 1989 Comment on Proposed Rev 3 to Reg Guide 1.9 Re Selection Design,Qualification,Testing & Reliability of Diesel Generator Units Used as Onsite Electric Power Sys at Nuclear Power Plants JPN-89-008, Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants1989-02-27027 February 1989 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants B13136, Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants.Proposed Rule on Maint Will Not Improve Maint in Plants Nor Improve Safety or Reliability of Plants.Proposed Rule Much Too Vague1989-02-27027 February 1989 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants.Proposed Rule on Maint Will Not Improve Maint in Plants Nor Improve Safety or Reliability of Plants.Proposed Rule Much Too Vague ML20235T3581989-02-27027 February 1989 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants.Util Endorses Comments Filed by NUMARC & Nuclear Util Backfitting & Reform Group.Rule Fails to Provide Basis for Determining Effective Maint Program ML20235V8541989-02-27027 February 1989 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants. Util Committed to Goal of Achieving Improved Reliability & Safety Through Better Maint ML20235T1861989-02-24024 February 1989 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants, Extension of NRC Authority to BOP Portion of Plant & Misapplication of Adequate Protection Std of Backfit Rule ML20235T7391989-02-23023 February 1989 Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 55 Re Educ & Experience Requirements for Senior Reactor Operators & Supervisors at Nuclear Power Plants ML20235N8531989-02-14014 February 1989 Comment Supporting Chapter 1 Re Policy Statement on Exemptions Below Regulatory Concern.Policy Development for Criteria for Release of Radioactive Matl Needed for Development of Consistent Waste Mgt Practices ML20235L5921989-02-0606 February 1989 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule on Chapter 1 Re Proposed Policy Statement Exemptions from Regulatory Control.Extreme Care Will Be Needed in Establishing State Role Both in Developing Rule & in Subsequent Implementation ML20206M5321988-11-21021 November 1988 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re fitness-for-duty Program ML20195H0331988-11-21021 November 1988 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Fitness for Duty Program Which Includes Random Drug Testing.Util Strongly Favors 180- Day Period for Implementation of Rule & 360-day Implementation Period for Random Drug Testing JPN-88-063, Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Fitness for Duty Program.Util Has Constitutional Concerns Re Proposed Random Testing Which Should Be Fully Addressed Prior to Rule Being Promulgated.Endorses NUMARC & EEI Comments1988-11-18018 November 1988 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Fitness for Duty Program.Util Has Constitutional Concerns Re Proposed Random Testing Which Should Be Fully Addressed Prior to Rule Being Promulgated.Endorses NUMARC & EEI Comments ML20195H0111988-11-18018 November 1988 Comment Supporting NUMARC Comments on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re NRC Fitness for Duty Program Which Includes Random Drug Testing ML20205Q2061988-10-28028 October 1988 Comment Opposing Petition for Rulemaking PRM 50-52 Re Exemption of Financial Qualifications of Applicants from Review of OL Applications.Petition Presents No Compelling Reason to Amend Current Rules ML20205Q1501988-10-28028 October 1988 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re NUREG-1317, Regulatory Options for Nuclear Plant License Renewal. Safety Sys Functional Insps & Configuration Mgt Programs Support Renewal Basis as Opposed to Relicensing Process ML20205Q6661988-10-27027 October 1988 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re NUREG-1317, Regulatory Options for Nuclear Plant License Renewal. Endorses NUMARC Nuplex Working Group Comments,Including Use of Licensing Basis at Facility When Renewal Application Submitted ML20205P9691988-10-26026 October 1988 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re NUREG-1317, Regulatory Options for Nuclear License Renewal. Supports Contents of NUREG-1317 & Endorses NUMARC Comments on Rulemaking & Position Paper by NUMARC Nuplex Working Group ML20195E6501988-10-24024 October 1988 Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM 50-52 Re NRC Reinstatement of Financial Qualifications of Util as Consideration in Operating Licensing Hearings for Electric Utils ML20205L7931988-10-20020 October 1988 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR20 Re Onsite Incineration of Radwaste Oil ML20205L2791988-10-20020 October 1988 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR150 Re Reasserting NRC Authority for Approving Onsite Low Level Waste Disposal in Agreement States ML20205N9841988-10-0606 October 1988 Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-52 Re Necessity for Financial Stability of Utils Involved in Nuclear Power ML20205A7691988-10-0606 October 1988 Comment on Petition for Rulemaking PRM 50-52 Re Potential Shutdown of Facility.Petition Should Receive Fair Hearing & Admit Use of Poor Judgment in Issuing Final Rule on 840812 ML20155E8931988-10-0303 October 1988 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50.54(w)(5)(i) Re Amending Implementation Schedule for Stabilization & Decontamination Priority & Trusteeship Provisions of Property Insurance Regulations.Nrc Initiated Exemptions Expected Before 881004 ML20154R6491988-09-25025 September 1988 Requests Extension of Comment Period on Proposed Rule 10CFR52 Re Reactor Licensing ML20155A6591988-09-0303 September 1988 Comment Supporting Petition to Rescind Paragraphs (X)(Y) of Section 10CFR50.54 Re Cases of Hazardous Practices Including Util Authorizing Senior Operator to Turn Off Safety Sys in Emergency Before Sys Has Finished Job ML20154S3381988-09-0202 September 1988 Comment on NUREG-1217 & NUREG-1218 Re Proposed Resolution of USI 1-47, Safety Implications of Control Sys ML20153F9681988-08-17017 August 1988 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Licensee Flexibility During Natl Crisis.Deferral of Issuance of Final Rule Until Proper Implementation Guidance Formulated Encouraged ML20151L9621988-07-26026 July 1988 Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR170 & 171 Re Revs of Fee Schedules.Requests That Commissioners Reexamine NRC Current Budgetary Processes in Order to Provide Greater Assurance of Reasonable Correlation Between Svcs & Costs 1998-03-04
[Table view] |
Text
-_
k g
- DOCKET NU!ABERgd P'ROPOSED RULE-G3 fR 4928E
-PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY
- Q, -...
F 1
2301 MARKET STREET 89 AFR -7. P4 :12 P.O. BOX 8699 j
PHILADELPHIA Ac PA.19101
,.y l
Dij(.gi,
"r (2 m s m 221 April'4F1989 "
- c. A. uenssu., an.
li l
, Cx2cuTavs vics pass sosNT. NUCLE AR The BonorablelLando_W.~Zech, Jr.
Chairman
,k U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission M
Washington,~D.C.
20555
" ' 4.
Dear. Chairman Zech:
In. view of-the continued.high. level of interest in the proposedtrulemaking for nuclear plant maintenance, I feel it is appropriate.to emphasize our. commitment to improved maintenance andTto pass.along to you some of.our recent initiatives and our
'long-term maintenance-improvement strategy.
-We'have' reorganized our station maintenance. forces to
. reduce the layers of management between the first-line-worker and.
- the! site vice president"from 7 to 4.
We feel this will give us
.significantly improved management control and improved communications with respect'to maintenance field activities.
One of the key' strategies of the Nuclear Group's commitment to excellence is'a 3 to 5 year detailed plan for maintenance improvement..This plan has been divided into 9 key clements which we feel are the; root cause solutions to existing maintenance deficiencies.
o'-
We are defining the role of our centralized maintenance forces and maintenance contractors such that during non-outage periods, we will have a work force that contains essentially no contractors, 90%
station maintenance personnel, and 10% central maintenance personnel.
During outage periods, we will use all available central maintenance resources with specialty technical services provided by vendors.
We anticipate using no contractors for supplemental maintenance purposes.
o We have initiated a task force to streamline the i
permit and blocking system such that a minimum number of' safety tags are applied while at the same time the level of safety is maintained or improved.
We will Ilf O also. develop a visual method to provide an overview of what is safety blocked on a system-by-system basis.
}
8905230105 890404
?
PDR PR 50 53FR47822.
PDR f
n
'e t
?ThDLBonarEblo L3ndo W'.
Etch,'Jr.
. April--4, 1989 r
c Page 2 b
' ~.
o:
We.are developing a~ simplified and more effective if
. maintenance work flow control system.
This improved work-process system will'have minimal and. efficient-Linterface. stages to improve coordination between all the groups involved.with field maintenance activities.
A portion of this task is devoted to the development of, acceptance of and training in the new system by all involved. personnel.
o.
We are developing an~ organized and efficient warehousing.systemLof qualified components and parts which have ?xan evaluated to be prudent to stock.
We s
- are also de m toping the dynamic capability to obtain items which are no longer stocked or are no longer available from the original manufacturer.
o We;will continually increase and improve the job
. planning activity until work package planning is an Y
' integral part of the maintenance function.
We will schedule andrintegrate work packages and generate a resource loaded schedule for all groups.
This will allow maintenance to be performed int a well-planned, predictable, and timely manner.
o We are developing work standard and productivity tools to be used for the planning of maintenance activities
- and the prediction of work content and' manpower I
' requirements.
o One of our-major thrusts is the development of the genaral mechanic concept.. We feel that a general V
mechanic can~ perform approximately 80% of the maintenance tasks normally.found at a nuclear plant.
By.using a composite-type crew, we can eliminate numerous interfaces between specific trades.
We also expect to develop maintenance radiation workers with less. dependence on specialized health ~ physics h
technicians for normal maintenance functions.
By doing this, we will clearly improve efficiency, enhance the team concept, and develop a stronger sense of ownership on the part of maintenance personnel.
o We are moving forcefully towards a reliability based preventive maintenance program.
Such a program will include equipment history, NPRDS input, corrective maintenance feedback, vendor recommendations, probabilistic risks assessment guidelines, industry
,3 experience, and predictive maintenance techniques.
We have already implemented the use of predictive maintenance techniques with respect to vibration analysis and the balancing of rotating equipment.
_=
u e
[
,[,
April"4, 1989
- Th3:Bonorcblo Lando'W. 1:ch, Jr.
- 7.
Page'3
- o We will continue the development of qualified' crafts-fand supervisors using the Institute of Nuclear Power L perations accredited training programs.
In addition, O
we-will, select maintenance first-line supervision based.on their qualifications for supervision and not just their seniority and craft skill qualifications.
We will, train these men in supervisory techniques before they are assigned to line foreman positions.
For each of the 9 strategy elements listed above, we have appointed a task force.
Implementation of the task force output.will.be a line function.
I have provided this brief outline of'our maintenance otrategy to highlight the point that a strong maintenance program is clearly in our own best 1nterest.
As recent events have
~
clearly proven, the health and safety of the general public and the financial well.being of the Philadelphia Electric Company are clearly inter-related.
We have undertaken this effort despite recent NRC maintenance program" inspections at both Limerick and Peach Bottom which have concluded that the Philadelphia Electric Company is implementing an effective maintenance program.
If I can provide any more information relative to our maintenance strategy,-please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely, T
o 4
cc:. K. M. Carr, Commissioner, USNRC J. R. Curtis, Commissioner, USNRC
'T. M. Roberts, Commissioner, USNRC L
LK. Rogers, Commissioner, USNRC Byron Lee, Jr., NUMARC lr l
_. _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ -