ML15173A273: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| issue date = 06/30/2015 | | issue date = 06/30/2015 | ||
| title = Summary of June 4, 2015, Category 1 Public Meeting with Energy Northwest to Discussion Columbia Generating Station Seismic Hazard Reevaluation Associated with Implementation of Japan Lessons-Learned Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.1, | | title = Summary of June 4, 2015, Category 1 Public Meeting with Energy Northwest to Discussion Columbia Generating Station Seismic Hazard Reevaluation Associated with Implementation of Japan Lessons-Learned Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.1, | ||
| author name = Vega F | | author name = Vega F | ||
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/JLD | | author affiliation = NRC/NRR/JLD | ||
| addressee name = | | addressee name = | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| docket = 05000397 | | docket = 05000397 | ||
| license number = | | license number = | ||
| contact person = Vega F | | contact person = Vega F, NRR/JLD, 415-1617 | ||
| document type = Meeting Summary, Memoranda | | document type = Meeting Summary, Memoranda | ||
| page count = 6 | | page count = 6 | ||
| project = | |||
| stage = Meeting | |||
}} | }} | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:LICENSEE: | {{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 June 30, 2015 LICENSEE: Energy Northwest FACILITY: Columbia Generating Station | ||
FACILITY: | |||
==SUBJECT:== | ==SUBJECT:== | ||
==SUMMARY== | ==SUMMARY== | ||
OF JUNE 4, 2015, CATEGORY 1 PUBLIC MEETING WITH ENERGY NORTHWEST TO DISCUSS THE SEISMIC HAZARD REEVALUATION ASSOCIATED WITH IMPLEMENTATION OF JAPAN LESSONS-LEARNED NEAR-TERM TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION 2.1, SEISMIC FOR COLUMBIA GENERATING STATION On June 4, 2015 1 , the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff held a Category 1 public meeting with Energy Northwest (EN, the licensee) at NRC Headquarters, One White Flint North, 11545 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland. | OF JUNE 4, 2015, CATEGORY 1 PUBLIC MEETING WITH ENERGY NORTHWEST TO DISCUSS THE SEISMIC HAZARD REEVALUATION ASSOCIATED WITH IMPLEMENTATION OF JAPAN LESSONS-LEARNED NEAR-TERM TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION 2.1, SEISMIC FOR COLUMBIA GENERATING STATION On June 4, 2015 1 , the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff held a Category 1 public meeting with Energy Northwest (EN, the licensee) at NRC Headquarters, One White Flint North, 11545 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland. The purpose of this meeting was to discuss the Seismic Hazard Reevaluation 2 associated with the implementation of Near-Term Task Force (NTTF) Recommendation 2.1: Seismic of the March 12, 2012, NRC request for information issued pursuant to Title 10 to the Code of Federal Regulations Part 50, Section 50.54(f) | ||
The purpose of this meeting was to discuss the Seismic Hazard Reevaluation 2 associated with the implementation of Near-Term Task Force (NTTF) Recommendation 2.1: Seismic of the March 12, 2012, NRC request for information issued pursuant to Title 10 to the Code of Federal Regulations Part 50, Section 50.54(f) (hereafter referred to as the 50.54(f) letter)3 for Columbia Generating Station (Columbia). | (hereafter referred to as the 50.54(f) letter) 3 for Columbia Generating Station (Columbia). | ||
During the meeting, the NRC staff provided an overview of NTTF Recommendation 2.1 "Seismic" including specifics of the review process as it relates to the Western United States (WUS) sites 4. Additionally, EN representatives provided an overview of Columbia's seismic hazard reevaluation which included specific discussions of several focus areas identified by the staff and conveyed to EN before the public meeting 5. The NRC staff and EN representatives' discussions included the following meeting highlights: | During the meeting, the NRC staff provided an overview of NTTF Recommendation 2.1 "Seismic" including specifics of the review process as it relates to the Western United States (WUS) sites 4 . Additionally, EN representatives provided an overview of Columbia's seismic hazard reevaluation which included specific discussions of several focus areas identified by the staff and conveyed to EN before the public meeting 5 . | ||
The NRC staff and EN representatives' discussions included the following meeting highlights: | |||
* The NRC staff presented an overview of NTTF Recommendation 2.1 "Seismic" review process which included specifics on how the process would be applied to the review of the WUS submittals. | * The NRC staff presented an overview of NTTF Recommendation 2.1 "Seismic" review process which included specifics on how the process would be applied to the review of the WUS submittals. | ||
* The NRC staff provided the overall schedules for Recommendation 2.1 seismic hazard and risk evaluation activities. | * The NRC staff provided the overall schedules for Recommendation 2.1 seismic hazard and risk evaluation activities. The staff stated that Columbia, by letter dated May 13, 20156 , was placed into the highest priority grcup (Group 1) for the reevaluated seismic hazard review. | ||
The staff stated that Columbia, by letter dated May 13, | 1 The meeting notice is available via the Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) under Accession No. ML15155A759. * . | ||
* . 2 Columbia*s Seismic Hazard Reevaluation is available via ADAMS under Accession No. | 2 Columbia*s Seismic Hazard Reevaluation is available via ADAMS under Accession No. ML15078A243. | ||
3 The 50.54(f) letter and Enclosure 1 are available under ADAMS Accession Nos. | 3 The 50.54(f) letter and Enclosure 1 are available under ADAMS Accession Nos. ML12053A340 and ML12056A047, respectively. | ||
4 The NRC's slide presentation is available via ADAMS under Accession No. | 4 The NRC's slide presentation is available via ADAMS under Accession No. ML15155A748. | ||
5 The licensee's slide presentation is available via ADAMS under Accession No | 5 The licensee's slide presentation is available via ADAMS under Accession No ML151548396. | ||
6 The screening and prioritization results for the WUS sites can be found via ADAMS under Accession No. | 6 The screening and prioritization results for the WUS sites can be found via ADAMS under Accession No. ML151138344 | ||
* The licensee provided an overview of its seismic hazard reevaluation. | * The licensee provided an overview of its seismic hazard reevaluation. Specifically, EN responded to a series of focus areas that the staff had identified and conveyed to EN before the meeting 7 . These discussions helped the staff better understand EN's approaches and added clarity to assist in the staff's review. | ||
Specifically, EN responded to a series of focus areas that the staff had identified and conveyed to EN before the meeting 7. These discussions helped the staff better understand EN's approaches and added clarity to assist in the staff's review. | |||
* The licensee provided an overview of the FLEX strategy implemented for Columbia. | * The licensee provided an overview of the FLEX strategy implemented for Columbia. | ||
The licensee also provided a summary of its seismic interim evaluation which included risk information based on the current Seismic Probabilistic Risk Assessment (SPRA) performed for the site. In addition, the licensee stated that it is currently developing the Expedited Seismic Evaluation Process which is due by January 2016. | The licensee also provided a summary of its seismic interim evaluation which included risk information based on the current Seismic Probabilistic Risk Assessment (SPRA) performed for the site. In addition, the licensee stated that it is currently developing the Expedited Seismic Evaluation Process which is due by January 2016. | ||
* The licensee stated that it is moving forward with the SPRA, in accordance with the Screening, Prioritization, and Implementation Details. The SPRAs for Group 1 plants are due by June 2017. | * The licensee stated that it is moving forward with the SPRA, in accordance with the Screening, Prioritization, and Implementation Details. The SPRAs for Group 1 plants are due by June 2017. | ||
* In addition to the questions asked during the meeting, the staff indicated that it expects to issue requests for additional information by the end of summer I early fall 2015. No regulatory decisions or commitments were made during the meeting. The public was invited to observe the meeting and was given an opportunity to communicate with the NRC during the public meeting before adjourning. | * In addition to the questions asked during the meeting, the staff indicated that it expects to issue requests for additional information by the end of summer I early fall 2015. | ||
The NRC staff received several public comments, some were addressed during the meeting and others, given the technical complexity, the staff requested they be sent by email to support a response. | No regulatory decisions or commitments were made during the meeting. The public was invited to observe the meeting and was given an opportunity to communicate with the NRC during the public meeting before adjourning. The NRC staff received several public comments, some were addressed during the meeting and others, given the technical complexity, the staff requested they be sent by email to support a response. The staff acknowledged and appreciated these comments and they will be considered as part of the ongoing NTTF Recommendation 2.1: | ||
The staff acknowledged and appreciated these comments and they will be considered as part of the ongoing NTTF Recommendation 2.1: Seismic reviews. Below is a summary of such comments. | Seismic reviews. Below is a summary of such comments. No meeting feedback forms were received. | ||
No meeting feedback forms were received. | |||
Mr. Charles K. Johnson (Oregon and Washington Physicians for Social Responsibility) expressed his concerns related to several United States Geological Survey (USGS) seismic studies that, according to him, were not included by the licensee when assessing the seismic hazard for the Columbia site. Mr. Johnson also mentioned several potential issues related to the plant's daily operation that should be considered as part of the upcoming risk evaluations. | Mr. Charles K. Johnson (Oregon and Washington Physicians for Social Responsibility) expressed his concerns related to several United States Geological Survey (USGS) seismic studies that, according to him, were not included by the licensee when assessing the seismic hazard for the Columbia site. Mr. Johnson also mentioned several potential issues related to the plant's daily operation that should be considered as part of the upcoming risk evaluations. | ||
Mr. Johnson encouraged EN and the staff to consider this information when making the determination that the plant is safe to operate. The staff notes that Columbia continues to operate safely including consideration of the new seismic hazard information. | Mr. Johnson encouraged EN and the staff to consider this information when making the determination that the plant is safe to operate. The staff notes that Columbia continues to operate safely including consideration of the new seismic hazard information. Regarding the USGS seismic studies, the Senior Seismic Hazard Analysis Committee (SSHAC) process requires that a range of technical information be considered. NRC staff is continuing to assess the fidelity of Columbia's SSHAC process. | ||
Regarding the USGS seismic studies, the Senior Seismic Hazard Analysis Committee (SSHAC) process requires that a range of technical information be considered. | 7 The NRC technical focus Areas for support of public meeting on June 4, 2015, can be found via ADAMS under Accession No. ML15142A395. | ||
NRC staff is continuing to assess the fidelity of Columbia's SSHAC process. 7 The NRC technical focus Areas for support of public meeting on June 4, 2015, can be found via ADAMS under Accession No. ML15142A395. Please direct any inquiries to me at 301-415-1617 or by e-mail at Frankie.Vega@nrc.gov. | |||
Docket No. 50-397 | Please direct any inquiries to me at 301-415-1617 or by e-mail at Frankie.Vega@nrc.gov. | ||
Sincerely, Frt~roject Hazards Management Branch Manager Japan Lessons-Learned Division Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-397 | |||
==Enclosure:== | ==Enclosure:== | ||
List of Attendees cc w/encl: Distribution via Listserv | List of Attendees cc w/encl: Distribution via Listserv | ||
List of Attendees U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Public Meeting with Energy Northwest to discuss the seismic hazard reevaluation associated with implementation of Japan Lessons-Learned Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.1. | |||
Seismic for Columbia Generating Station June 4. 2015 Name Organization Andrea Kock NRC/NRO Lisa Walsh NRC/NRO Clifford Munson NRC/NRO Diane Jackson NRC/NRO Scott Stoval NRC/RES Jon Ake NRC/RES Nicholas DiFrancesco NRC/NRR Mohamed Shams NRC/NRR Vladimir Graizer NRC/NRO Frankie Vega NRC/NRR Gerry Stirewalt NRC/NRO Thomas Weaver NRC/RES Kamal Manely NRC/NRR Alice Stieve NRC/NRO Dogan Seber NRC/NRO Stephanie Devlin-Gill NRC/NRO Balwant Singal NRC/NRR Brittan Hill NRC/NRO (continues to next page) | |||
Abbreviations: | |||
NEI - Nuclear Energy Institute PNNL - Pacific Northwest National Laboratory NRO - Office of New Reactors NRR - Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation RES - Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research CNWRA - Center for Nuclear Waste Regulatory Analyses DNFSB - Defense Nuclear Facilities Security Board Enclosure | |||
Name Organization Farhang Ostadan Bechtel David Swank Energy Northwest Mike Kennedy Energy Northwest Greg Lisle Energy Northwest Andrew Mauer NEI Lisa Williams Energy Northwest John Stamatakos CNWRA Bob Youngs AMEC Kevin Coppersmith Emily Gibson DNFSB Miriam Juckett CNWRA Attendees Via Webinar or Telephone Name Organization Name Organization Angel Moreno NRC David Heeszel NRC Ryan Coppersmith Coppersmith consulting Richard Rogalski Energy-Northwest Kathryn Hanson AMEC Steve Sheahan Energy-Northwest John Richards EPRI G. George Abatt Bechtel Carola Di Alessandro Geopentech Charles Johnson Oregonpsr Russell Green VT John Davie Bechtel Susan Hoch Andrea Maioli Westignhouse Timothy Adams Vecsa Robert Bryce PNNL Velentina Montaldo Falero AMEC Albert Kottke Bechtel Don Gregoire Energy-Northwest Robert Meyer | |||
ML15173A273 *concurrence via e-mail OFFICE NRR/JLD/JHMB/PM NRR/JLD/LA NRO/DSEA/RGS/BC NAME FVega Slent DJackson DATE 06/23/15 06/23/15 06/26/15 OFFICE NRR/JLD/JHMB/BC NRR/JLD/JHMB/PM NAME MShams FVega DATE 06/30/15 06/30/15}} | |||
Latest revision as of 11:57, 5 February 2020
| ML15173A273 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Columbia  |
| Issue date: | 06/30/2015 |
| From: | Frankie Vega Japan Lessons-Learned Division |
| To: | Energy Northwest |
| Vega F, NRR/JLD, 415-1617 | |
| References | |
| Download: ML15173A273 (6) | |
Text
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 June 30, 2015 LICENSEE: Energy Northwest FACILITY: Columbia Generating Station
SUBJECT:
SUMMARY
OF JUNE 4, 2015, CATEGORY 1 PUBLIC MEETING WITH ENERGY NORTHWEST TO DISCUSS THE SEISMIC HAZARD REEVALUATION ASSOCIATED WITH IMPLEMENTATION OF JAPAN LESSONS-LEARNED NEAR-TERM TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION 2.1, SEISMIC FOR COLUMBIA GENERATING STATION On June 4, 2015 1 , the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff held a Category 1 public meeting with Energy Northwest (EN, the licensee) at NRC Headquarters, One White Flint North, 11545 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland. The purpose of this meeting was to discuss the Seismic Hazard Reevaluation 2 associated with the implementation of Near-Term Task Force (NTTF) Recommendation 2.1: Seismic of the March 12, 2012, NRC request for information issued pursuant to Title 10 to the Code of Federal Regulations Part 50, Section 50.54(f)
(hereafter referred to as the 50.54(f) letter) 3 for Columbia Generating Station (Columbia).
During the meeting, the NRC staff provided an overview of NTTF Recommendation 2.1 "Seismic" including specifics of the review process as it relates to the Western United States (WUS) sites 4 . Additionally, EN representatives provided an overview of Columbia's seismic hazard reevaluation which included specific discussions of several focus areas identified by the staff and conveyed to EN before the public meeting 5 .
The NRC staff and EN representatives' discussions included the following meeting highlights:
- The NRC staff presented an overview of NTTF Recommendation 2.1 "Seismic" review process which included specifics on how the process would be applied to the review of the WUS submittals.
- The NRC staff provided the overall schedules for Recommendation 2.1 seismic hazard and risk evaluation activities. The staff stated that Columbia, by letter dated May 13, 20156 , was placed into the highest priority grcup (Group 1) for the reevaluated seismic hazard review.
1 The meeting notice is available via the Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) under Accession No. ML15155A759. * .
2 Columbia*s Seismic Hazard Reevaluation is available via ADAMS under Accession No. ML15078A243.
3 The 50.54(f) letter and Enclosure 1 are available under ADAMS Accession Nos. ML12053A340 and ML12056A047, respectively.
4 The NRC's slide presentation is available via ADAMS under Accession No. ML15155A748.
5 The licensee's slide presentation is available via ADAMS under Accession No ML151548396.
6 The screening and prioritization results for the WUS sites can be found via ADAMS under Accession No. ML151138344
- The licensee provided an overview of its seismic hazard reevaluation. Specifically, EN responded to a series of focus areas that the staff had identified and conveyed to EN before the meeting 7 . These discussions helped the staff better understand EN's approaches and added clarity to assist in the staff's review.
- The licensee provided an overview of the FLEX strategy implemented for Columbia.
The licensee also provided a summary of its seismic interim evaluation which included risk information based on the current Seismic Probabilistic Risk Assessment (SPRA) performed for the site. In addition, the licensee stated that it is currently developing the Expedited Seismic Evaluation Process which is due by January 2016.
- The licensee stated that it is moving forward with the SPRA, in accordance with the Screening, Prioritization, and Implementation Details. The SPRAs for Group 1 plants are due by June 2017.
- In addition to the questions asked during the meeting, the staff indicated that it expects to issue requests for additional information by the end of summer I early fall 2015.
No regulatory decisions or commitments were made during the meeting. The public was invited to observe the meeting and was given an opportunity to communicate with the NRC during the public meeting before adjourning. The NRC staff received several public comments, some were addressed during the meeting and others, given the technical complexity, the staff requested they be sent by email to support a response. The staff acknowledged and appreciated these comments and they will be considered as part of the ongoing NTTF Recommendation 2.1:
Seismic reviews. Below is a summary of such comments. No meeting feedback forms were received.
Mr. Charles K. Johnson (Oregon and Washington Physicians for Social Responsibility) expressed his concerns related to several United States Geological Survey (USGS) seismic studies that, according to him, were not included by the licensee when assessing the seismic hazard for the Columbia site. Mr. Johnson also mentioned several potential issues related to the plant's daily operation that should be considered as part of the upcoming risk evaluations.
Mr. Johnson encouraged EN and the staff to consider this information when making the determination that the plant is safe to operate. The staff notes that Columbia continues to operate safely including consideration of the new seismic hazard information. Regarding the USGS seismic studies, the Senior Seismic Hazard Analysis Committee (SSHAC) process requires that a range of technical information be considered. NRC staff is continuing to assess the fidelity of Columbia's SSHAC process.
7 The NRC technical focus Areas for support of public meeting on June 4, 2015, can be found via ADAMS under Accession No. ML15142A395.
Please direct any inquiries to me at 301-415-1617 or by e-mail at Frankie.Vega@nrc.gov.
Sincerely, Frt~roject Hazards Management Branch Manager Japan Lessons-Learned Division Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-397
Enclosure:
List of Attendees cc w/encl: Distribution via Listserv
List of Attendees U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Public Meeting with Energy Northwest to discuss the seismic hazard reevaluation associated with implementation of Japan Lessons-Learned Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.1.
Seismic for Columbia Generating Station June 4. 2015 Name Organization Andrea Kock NRC/NRO Lisa Walsh NRC/NRO Clifford Munson NRC/NRO Diane Jackson NRC/NRO Scott Stoval NRC/RES Jon Ake NRC/RES Nicholas DiFrancesco NRC/NRR Mohamed Shams NRC/NRR Vladimir Graizer NRC/NRO Frankie Vega NRC/NRR Gerry Stirewalt NRC/NRO Thomas Weaver NRC/RES Kamal Manely NRC/NRR Alice Stieve NRC/NRO Dogan Seber NRC/NRO Stephanie Devlin-Gill NRC/NRO Balwant Singal NRC/NRR Brittan Hill NRC/NRO (continues to next page)
Abbreviations:
NEI - Nuclear Energy Institute PNNL - Pacific Northwest National Laboratory NRO - Office of New Reactors NRR - Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation RES - Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research CNWRA - Center for Nuclear Waste Regulatory Analyses DNFSB - Defense Nuclear Facilities Security Board Enclosure
Name Organization Farhang Ostadan Bechtel David Swank Energy Northwest Mike Kennedy Energy Northwest Greg Lisle Energy Northwest Andrew Mauer NEI Lisa Williams Energy Northwest John Stamatakos CNWRA Bob Youngs AMEC Kevin Coppersmith Emily Gibson DNFSB Miriam Juckett CNWRA Attendees Via Webinar or Telephone Name Organization Name Organization Angel Moreno NRC David Heeszel NRC Ryan Coppersmith Coppersmith consulting Richard Rogalski Energy-Northwest Kathryn Hanson AMEC Steve Sheahan Energy-Northwest John Richards EPRI G. George Abatt Bechtel Carola Di Alessandro Geopentech Charles Johnson Oregonpsr Russell Green VT John Davie Bechtel Susan Hoch Andrea Maioli Westignhouse Timothy Adams Vecsa Robert Bryce PNNL Velentina Montaldo Falero AMEC Albert Kottke Bechtel Don Gregoire Energy-Northwest Robert Meyer
ML15173A273 *concurrence via e-mail OFFICE NRR/JLD/JHMB/PM NRR/JLD/LA NRO/DSEA/RGS/BC NAME FVega Slent DJackson DATE 06/23/15 06/23/15 06/26/15 OFFICE NRR/JLD/JHMB/BC NRR/JLD/JHMB/PM NAME MShams FVega DATE 06/30/15 06/30/15