ML19211A104: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:}}
{{#Wiki_filter:. ,, .
September 26 Pa. Covernor Thornburgh and the NRC Commisioners                                        I/
(:en t l emen :
The following clipping is from an article in the New York Times, September 23:
Governor Thornburgh        Six weeks later. nn Aug. 9. Ihe commis-has strongly pmtested the utslity's plan to sion forhade restarting nf Unit One pend-start up the twin of the damaged reactor
* ing extensive pubhe heanngs on m f. ether which was shut down for repairs at the the desir.n of the Three Mile Islar.d reac-tirneof theaccident.                        tors made then subject to unusual prob.'
                              ' As Governor.
* Mr.Thornburgh wrote tems. The hearings are expected to take the Nuclear Regulatory Commission in atleast a y, car ar42 ha,1f.
June. "I have a deeply felt responsibility                -                        --
for both the physical and psychological secunty of the citizens of this common-wealth. Therefore. I am advising you of my strong oppnsition to any plans to reac-tavate Unit One until a number of very serious issues ha /e been resolved."
1          Other (B&W) reactors in nuclear power plants of similar vintage and design are operating all over the country, with appropriate technical fixes learned from TMI-2. Why do we have to wait for 1 1/2 years of public hearings to I
restart TMI-1? You know that TMI-1 can be operated as safely as the other ones - why not shut all the rest down for the " psychological security of the citizens" of their states?
What about the " psychological security" of the consumers of electricity from Met Ed, who will see their electric heating bills $50-S100/ month higher this January and February. They can thank you, Governor, for contributing to the year and a half schedule.
This business of going through a year and a half of public hearings looks very political anyway - there is political hay to be made - votes to be obtained -
by not allowing TMI-! to restart. I think that consumers are realizing what is happening and I hope end believe the votes for this political behavior will turn out to be negative.
5 And to the NRC commisioners I would ask, "Where.is your backbone?" You have no more reason to keep TMI-1 shut down than any other similar plant. And a year and a half of hearings is criminal.
Sincerelv,.
Gerald J. Kissel (3541 Stoner Ave.
Reading, pa. 19606) 1594            146 7912170                  gM}}

Latest revision as of 04:59, 2 February 2020

Expresses Concerns Over TMI Restart
ML19211A104
Person / Time
Site: Three Mile Island Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 09/29/1979
From: Kissel G
AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED
To: Thornburgh R
NRC COMMISSION (OCM), PENNSYLVANIA, COMMONWEALTH OF
Shared Package
ML19211A080 List:
References
790926, NUDOCS 7912170036
Download: ML19211A104 (1)


Text

. ,, .

September 26 Pa. Covernor Thornburgh and the NRC Commisioners I/

(:en t l emen :

The following clipping is from an article in the New York Times, September 23:

Governor Thornburgh Six weeks later. nn Aug. 9. Ihe commis-has strongly pmtested the utslity's plan to sion forhade restarting nf Unit One pend-start up the twin of the damaged reactor

  • ing extensive pubhe heanngs on m f. ether which was shut down for repairs at the the desir.n of the Three Mile Islar.d reac-tirneof theaccident. tors made then subject to unusual prob.'

' As Governor.

  • Mr.Thornburgh wrote tems. The hearings are expected to take the Nuclear Regulatory Commission in atleast a y, car ar42 ha,1f.

June. "I have a deeply felt responsibility - --

for both the physical and psychological secunty of the citizens of this common-wealth. Therefore. I am advising you of my strong oppnsition to any plans to reac-tavate Unit One until a number of very serious issues ha /e been resolved."

1 Other (B&W) reactors in nuclear power plants of similar vintage and design are operating all over the country, with appropriate technical fixes learned from TMI-2. Why do we have to wait for 1 1/2 years of public hearings to I

restart TMI-1? You know that TMI-1 can be operated as safely as the other ones - why not shut all the rest down for the " psychological security of the citizens" of their states?

What about the " psychological security" of the consumers of electricity from Met Ed, who will see their electric heating bills $50-S100/ month higher this January and February. They can thank you, Governor, for contributing to the year and a half schedule.

This business of going through a year and a half of public hearings looks very political anyway - there is political hay to be made - votes to be obtained -

by not allowing TMI-! to restart. I think that consumers are realizing what is happening and I hope end believe the votes for this political behavior will turn out to be negative.

5 And to the NRC commisioners I would ask, "Where.is your backbone?" You have no more reason to keep TMI-1 shut down than any other similar plant. And a year and a half of hearings is criminal.

Sincerelv,.

Gerald J. Kissel (3541 Stoner Ave.

Reading, pa. 19606) 1594 146 7912170 gM