ML062090328

Email: (PA) AMR Review of Section 3.3

ML062090328
Person / Time
Site:	Pilgrim
Issue date:	05/09/2006
From:	- No Known Affiliation
To:	Dan Hoang Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
%dam200612, TAC MC9669
Download: ML062090328 (3)

Text

1,James Davis - AMR review of section 3.3- Page 111 t

From: <erachp@comcast.net>

To: Dan Hoang <DVH@nrc.gov>

Date: Tue, May 9, 2006 11:18 AM

Subject:

AMR review of section 3.3 Dan, As I was reviewing section 3.3, Table 3.3.1, I came across some issues related to section 3.5. Hopefully you may have picked them up ifyou are done with your review. Otherwise, this may help.

1. Table 3.5.2.6, Bulk Commodities, component type fire hose reels, on page 3.5-74, credits fire protection program, and references table 3.5.1, line item 3.5.1-39. However, this line item only credits structures monitoring program and does not credit fire protection program.

I have also found issues where on Table 3.3.1, PNPS has stated that line item was not for Auxiliary system, butwas addressed in section 3.5. I have identified the following questions, that I plan to ask PNPS.

2. Table 3.3..1, item 3.3.1-61, for elastomer fire barrier penetration seals exposed to air - outdoor or air -

indoor uncontrolled. PNPS credits Fire Protection Program and states in the discussion column that this line item was not used in the auxiliary systems tables. Fire barrier seals are evaluated as structural components in Section 3.5. Cracking and the change in material properties of elastomer seals are managed by the Fire Protection Program.

However, in section 3.5, Table 3.5.2-6, Bulk Commodities, on pages 3.5-82, and 3.5-83, where line item 3.3.1-61 is referenced, PNPS credits the Fire Protection Program and the Structures Monitoring program.

However, line item 3.3.1-61 does not credit structures monitoring program. As a matter of fact, the Structures Monitoring Program is enhanced to add guidance for inspection of elastomer seals, etc. Please clarify if both programs are credited for managing aging effects for penetration seals as stated in Table 3.5.2-6, and if so, please supplement the LRA to include the Structures Monitoring program in Table 3.3.1, item 3.3.1-61.

Erach CC: Peter Wen <pxw@nrc.gov>, Jim Davis <jad@nrc.gov>

c:\temp\GW)0000I.TMP c:\tmp\G}OOO1 .TP -Page il Mail Envelope Properties (4460B2B9.397: 5: 54167)

Subject:

AMR review of section 3.3 Creation Date Tue, May 9, 2006 11:18 AM From: <erachp @comcast.net>

Created By: erachp @comcast.net Recipients nrc.gov OWGWPO02.HQGWDO01 DVH (Dan Hoang) nrc.gov TWGWPO02.HQGWDO01 PXW CC (Peter Wen) nrc.gov OWGWPO01.HQGWDO01 JAD CC (James Davis)

Post Office Route OWGWPO02.HQGWDO01 nrc.gov TWGWPO02.HQGWDO01 nrc.gov OWGWPO01.HQGWDOO1 nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 1795 Tuesday, May 9, 2006 11:18 AM TEXT.htm 2076 Mime.822 5380 Options Expiration Date: None Priority: Standard ReplyRequested: No Return Notification: None Concealed

Subject:

No Security: Standard Junk Mail Handling Evaluation Results Message is eligible for Junk Mail handling This message was not classified as Junk Mail

c:\temp\GW}O0001.TMP Page 2.1 Junk Mail settings when this message was delivered Junk Mail handling disabled by User Junk Mail handling disabled by Administrator Junk List is not enabled Junk Mail using personal address books is not enabled Block List is not enabled