ML062090561: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:F Jabes-bavis--Quality Assurance for aging management of NSR components Page.1..Page 1 I From: <erachp@comcast.net>
{{#Wiki_filter:FJabes-bavis--Quality Assurance for aging management of NSR components                                                 Page 1 I Page.1..
To: Duc Nguyen <dtnl @nrc.gov>, Wayne Pavinich <wapavinich@comcast.net>, Dan Hoang <DVH@nrc.gov>, Jim Davis <jad@nrc.gov>, Peter Wen <pxw@nrc.gov>, Bob Jackson<JacksonWR@msn.com>, Erach Patel <erachp@comcast.net>
From:               <erachp@comcast.net>
Date: 07/05/2006 1:22:08 PM  
To:                 Duc Nguyen <dtnl @nrc.gov>, Wayne Pavinich <wapavinich@comcast.net>, Dan Hoang     <DVH@nrc.gov>,   Jim Davis <jad@nrc.gov>, Peter Wen <pxw@nrc.gov>, Bob Jackson
              <JacksonWR@msn.com>, Erach Patel <erachp@comcast.net>
Date:               07/05/2006 1:22:08 PM


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Quality Assurance for aging management of NSR components Hi, In each of the AMR sections in the SRP, under AMR results for which further evaluation is recommended, we need to address how the applicant has applied their Corrective Action program to non-safety related components.
Quality Assurance for aging management of NSR components Hi, In each of the AMR sections in the SRP, under AMR results for which further evaluation is recommended, we need to address how the applicant has applied their Corrective Action program to non-safety related components. This is intended to address elements 7-9 in the AMPs.
This is intended to address elements 7-9 in the AMPs.These sections in the SRP are: 3.1.2.2.18, 3.2.2.2.10, 3.3.2.2.15, 3.4.2.2.10, 3.5.2.2.3, and 3.6.2.2.4.
These sections in the SRP are:
Jim Davis and I discussed this today, and here is how we will address it.In the Audit and review report, in the above listed sections, please make the following statement:
3.1.2.2.18, 3.2.2.2.10, 3.3.2.2.15, 3.4.2.2.10, 3.5.2.2.3, and 3.6.2.2.4.
3.1.2.2.15 (etc.) Quality Assurance for Aging Management of Non- Safety Related Components The applicant referenced LRA Section B.0.3. The project team's evaluation of Section B.0.3 is provided in Section 3.0.4 of this audit and review report.I will create a new Section 3.0.4 in the AMP part of the audit and review report. Jim Davis reviewed the PNPS Corrective Action program and will provide me the appropriate words to include in this section.If you have any questions, please call me or e-mail me.erach CC: Joe Zabel <JZabel@atlintl.com>, Mark Orr <MPOrr@atlintl.com>
Jim Davis and I discussed this today, and here is how we will address it.
I cAtemD\GWI00001.TMP Page 1 1 I c:\temD\GWIOOOO1 .TMP rage i ~Mail Envelope Properties (44ABF52F.AF6:
In the Audit and review report, in the above listed sections, please make the following statement:
4: 6902)
3.1.2.2.15 (etc.) Quality Assurance for Aging Management of Non-                       Safety Related Components The applicant referenced LRA Section B.0.3. The project team's evaluation of Section B.0.3 is provided in Section 3.0.4 of this audit and review report.
I will create a new Section 3.0.4 in the AMP part of the audit and review report. Jim Davis reviewed the PNPS Corrective Action program and will provide me the appropriate words to include in this section.
Ifyou have any questions, please call me or e-mail me.
erach CC:                 Joe Zabel <JZabel@atlintl.com>, Mark Orr <MPOrr@atlintl.com>
 
I cAtemD\GWI00001.TMP                                                                           rage i1 ~1 Page I c:\temD\GWIOOOO1 .TMP Mail Envelope Properties     (44ABF52F.AF6: 4: 6902)


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Creation Date From: Created By: Quality Assurance for aging management of NSR components 07/05/2006 1:21:24 PM<erachp @comcast.net>
Quality Assurance for aging management of NSR components Creation Date          07/05/2006 1:21:24 PM From:                  <erachp @comcast.net>
erachp~@comcast.net Recipients nrc.gov TWGWPO01.HQGWDO01 DTNI (Duc Nguyen)nrc.gov OWGWPOO2.HQGWDOO1 DVH (Dan Hoang)nrc.gov OWGWPO03.HQGWDO01 JAD (James Davis)nrc.gov TWGWPOO4.HQGWDOO1 PXW (Peter Wen)atlintl.com MPOrr CC (Mark Off)JZabel CC (Joe Zabel)msn.com JacksonWR (Bob Jackson)comcast.net wapavinich (Wayne Pavinich)Post Office TWGWPOO1.HQGWDOO1 OWGWPOO2.HQGWDOO1 OWGWPOO3.HQGWDOO1 TWGWPO04.HQGWDO01 Route nrc.gov nrc.gov nrc.gov nrc.gov atlinti.com msn.com comcast.net I Ote D\GW)00001.TMP Paae 2 1 I cAtem rAG WIOOOO1 .TMP Paae 211 *.............~  
erachp~@comcast.net Created By:
,.~. ...~--------------~.  
Recipients nrc.gov TWGWPO01.HQGWDO01 DTNI (Duc Nguyen) nrc.gov OWGWPOO2.HQGWDOO1 DVH (Dan Hoang) nrc.gov OWGWPO03.HQGWDO01 JAD (James Davis) nrc.gov TWGWPOO4.HQGWDOO1 PXW (Peter Wen) atlintl.com MPOrr CC (Mark Off)
-p Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 1105 07/05/2006 1:21:24 PM TEXT.htm 1577 Mime.822 4433 Options Expiration Date: None Priority:
JZabel CC (Joe Zabel) msn.com JacksonWR (Bob Jackson) comcast.net wapavinich (Wayne Pavinich)
Standard ReplyRequested:
Post Office                                                           Route TWGWPOO1.HQGWDOO1                                                   nrc.gov OWGWPOO2.HQGWDOO1                                                   nrc.gov OWGWPOO3.HQGWDOO1                                                   nrc.gov TWGWPO04.HQGWDO01                                                    nrc.gov atlinti.com msn.com comcast.net
No Return Notification:
 
None Concealed  
I Ote   D\GW)00001.TMP                                                                               Paae 2 1 I cAtem rAG WIOOOO1 .TMP
              *.............~                                   ,.~.           ... ~--------------~. Paae 211
                                                                                                      -
p Files                             Size               Date & Time MESSAGE                         1105               07/05/2006 1:21:24 PM TEXT.htm                         1577 Mime.822                       4433 Options Expiration Date:               None Priority:                       Standard ReplyRequested:                 No Return Notification:           None Concealed  


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
No Security:
No Security:                       Standard Junk Mail Handling Evaluation Results Message is eligible for Junk Mail handling This message was not classified as Junk Mail Junk Mail settings when this message was delivered Junk Mail handling disabled by User Junk Mail handling disabled by Administrator Junk List is not enabled Junk Mail using personal address books is not enabled Block List is not enabled}}
Standard Junk Mail Handling Evaluation Results Message is eligible for Junk Mail handling This message was not classified as Junk Mail Junk Mail settings when this message was delivered Junk Mail handling disabled by User Junk Mail handling disabled by Administrator Junk List is not enabled Junk Mail using personal address books is not enabled Block List is not enabled}}

Revision as of 15:47, 23 November 2019

2006/07/05-Email: (PA) Quality Asurance for Aging Management of NSR Components
ML062090561
Person / Time
Site: Pilgrim
Issue date: 07/05/2006
From: Patel E
- No Known Affiliation
To: Jennifer Davis, Dan Hoang, Jackson B, Dang Nguyen, Patel E, Pavinich W, Wen P
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
%dam200612, TAC MC9669
Download: ML062090561 (3)


Text

FJabes-bavis--Quality Assurance for aging management of NSR components Page 1 I Page.1..

From: <erachp@comcast.net>

To: Duc Nguyen <dtnl @nrc.gov>, Wayne Pavinich <wapavinich@comcast.net>, Dan Hoang <DVH@nrc.gov>, Jim Davis <jad@nrc.gov>, Peter Wen <pxw@nrc.gov>, Bob Jackson

<JacksonWR@msn.com>, Erach Patel <erachp@comcast.net>

Date: 07/05/2006 1:22:08 PM

Subject:

Quality Assurance for aging management of NSR components Hi, In each of the AMR sections in the SRP, under AMR results for which further evaluation is recommended, we need to address how the applicant has applied their Corrective Action program to non-safety related components. This is intended to address elements 7-9 in the AMPs.

These sections in the SRP are:

3.1.2.2.18, 3.2.2.2.10, 3.3.2.2.15, 3.4.2.2.10, 3.5.2.2.3, and 3.6.2.2.4.

Jim Davis and I discussed this today, and here is how we will address it.

In the Audit and review report, in the above listed sections, please make the following statement:

3.1.2.2.15 (etc.) Quality Assurance for Aging Management of Non- Safety Related Components The applicant referenced LRA Section B.0.3. The project team's evaluation of Section B.0.3 is provided in Section 3.0.4 of this audit and review report.

I will create a new Section 3.0.4 in the AMP part of the audit and review report. Jim Davis reviewed the PNPS Corrective Action program and will provide me the appropriate words to include in this section.

Ifyou have any questions, please call me or e-mail me.

erach CC: Joe Zabel <JZabel@atlintl.com>, Mark Orr <MPOrr@atlintl.com>

I cAtemD\GWI00001.TMP rage i1 ~1 Page I c:\temD\GWIOOOO1 .TMP Mail Envelope Properties (44ABF52F.AF6: 4: 6902)

Subject:

Quality Assurance for aging management of NSR components Creation Date 07/05/2006 1:21:24 PM From: <erachp @comcast.net>

erachp~@comcast.net Created By:

Recipients nrc.gov TWGWPO01.HQGWDO01 DTNI (Duc Nguyen) nrc.gov OWGWPOO2.HQGWDOO1 DVH (Dan Hoang) nrc.gov OWGWPO03.HQGWDO01 JAD (James Davis) nrc.gov TWGWPOO4.HQGWDOO1 PXW (Peter Wen) atlintl.com MPOrr CC (Mark Off)

JZabel CC (Joe Zabel) msn.com JacksonWR (Bob Jackson) comcast.net wapavinich (Wayne Pavinich)

Post Office Route TWGWPOO1.HQGWDOO1 nrc.gov OWGWPOO2.HQGWDOO1 nrc.gov OWGWPOO3.HQGWDOO1 nrc.gov TWGWPO04.HQGWDO01 nrc.gov atlinti.com msn.com comcast.net

I Ote D\GW)00001.TMP Paae 2 1 I cAtem rAG WIOOOO1 .TMP

  • .............~ ,.~. ... ~--------------~. Paae 211

-

p Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 1105 07/05/2006 1:21:24 PM TEXT.htm 1577 Mime.822 4433 Options Expiration Date: None Priority: Standard ReplyRequested: No Return Notification: None Concealed

Subject:

No Security: Standard Junk Mail Handling Evaluation Results Message is eligible for Junk Mail handling This message was not classified as Junk Mail Junk Mail settings when this message was delivered Junk Mail handling disabled by User Junk Mail handling disabled by Administrator Junk List is not enabled Junk Mail using personal address books is not enabled Block List is not enabled