ML18031A440: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 05/12/1986
| issue date = 05/12/1986
| title = Responds to NRC 860416 Ltr Re Violations Noted in Insp Repts 50-259/86-08,50-260/86-08 & 50-296/86-08.Corrective Actions: Followup Program Established Requiring Weekly Check of Protective Covers on QA Program Storage Items
| title = Responds to NRC 860416 Ltr Re Violations Noted in Insp Repts 50-259/86-08,50-260/86-08 & 50-296/86-08.Corrective Actions: Followup Program Established Requiring Weekly Check of Protective Covers on QA Program Storage Items
| author name = SHELL R H
| author name = Shell R
| author affiliation = TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
| author affiliation = TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
| addressee name = GRACE J N
| addressee name = Grace J
| addressee affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
| addressee affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
| docket = 05000259, 05000260, 05000296
| docket = 05000259, 05000260, 05000296
Line 14: Line 14:
| page count = 4
| page count = 4
}}
}}
See also: [[followed by::IR 05000259/1986008]]


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY CHATTANOOGA.
{{#Wiki_filter:TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY CHATTANOOGA. TENNESSEE 37401 5N 157B Lookout Place May 12, 1986 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region   II ATTN: Dr. J. Nelson Grace, Regional Administrator 101 Marietta Street, NW, Suite     2900 Atlanta, Georgia 30323
TENNESSEE 37401 5N 157B Lookout Place May 12, 1986 U.S.Nuclear Regulatory
 
Commission
==Dear Dr. Grace:==
Region II ATTN: Dr.J.Nelson Grace, Regional Administrator
 
101 Marietta Street, NW, Suite 2900 Atlanta, Georgia 30323 Dear Dr.Grace: BROWNS FERRY NUCLEAR PLANT UNITS 1, 2,-NRC-OIE REGION II INSPECTION
BROWNS FERRY NUCLEAR PLANT     UNITS   1, 2,           NRC-OIE REGION   II INSPECTION REPORT   50-259/86-08, 50-260/86-08,       -296/86-08       RESPONSE TO VIOLATIONS Enclosed is our response to J. A. Olshinski's April 16, 1986 letter to S. A. White transmitting IE Inspection Report Nos. 50-259/86-08, 50-260/86-08, and 50-296/86-08 for our Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant which cited TVA with one Severity Level   V Violation.
REPORT 50-259/86-08, 50-260/86-08,-296/86-08
If   you have any questions,   please get in touch with R. E. Rogers at         FTS 858-2723.
RESPONSE TO VIOLATIONS
To   the best of my knowledge,   I declare the statements       contained herein are complete and true.
Enclosed is our response to J.A.Olshinski's
Very truly yours, TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY R. H. Shell Nuclear Engineer Enclosure cc: Mr. James Taylor, Director (Enclosure)
April 16, 1986 letter to S.A.White transmitting
Office of Inspection and Enforcement U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 8606020150 860512 PDR   ADOCK 05000259 8                 PDR An Equal Opportunity Employer 1 \
IE Inspection
MEO I
Report Nos.50-259/86-08, 50-260/86-08, and 50-296/86-08
 
for our Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant which cited TVA with one Severity Level V Violation.
~ ~
If you have any questions, please get in touch with R.E.Rogers at FTS 858-2723.To the best of my knowledge, I declare the statements
ENCLOSURE
contained herein are complete and true.Very truly yours, TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY Enclosure cc: Mr.James Taylor, Director (Enclosure)
 
Office of Inspection
===RESPONSE===
and Enforcement
NRC INSPECTION REPORT NOS.
U.S.Nuclear Regulatory
50-259/86>>08,   50-260/86-08,   AND 50-296/86-08 JOHN A. OLSHINSKI'S LETTER TO S. A. WHITE DATED APRIL 16, 1986 Item 1
Commission
'10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion XIII and the accepted Quality Assurance (QA)
Washington, D.C.20555 R.H.Shell Nuclear Engineer 8606020150
Program (TVA Topical Report TVA-TR75-1A), Section 17.2.13, require that items in the gA program be stored to prevent damage or deterioration. The QA program commits to Regulatory Guide 1.38, Revisi.on 2, which endorses ANSI N45.2.2-1972, Packaging, Shipping, Receiving, Storage, and Handling of Items for Nuclear Power Plants. Section 6.4.2(1) of this standard requires that items in storage have all covers, caps, or plugs or other protective closures intact.
860512 PDR ADOCK 05000259 8 PDR An Equal Opportunity
Contrary to the above, during a tour of the Engineering Change Notice (ECN) warehouse on March 5, 1986, the inspector identified that most stainless steel tubing (AMG 1384) and a solenoid valve (Contract Number 84PJ5-834065) were not protected as required. Further visual inspection also identified additional examples of items in storage that were not. protected as required.
Employer 1\MEO I  
This is   a Severity Level V violation   (Supplement, I).
~~  
: 1. Admission or Denial of the   Alle ed Violation TVA admits the violation.
ENCLOSURE RESPONSE NRC INSPECTION
: 2. Reasons   For the Violation A lack of attentiveness   to protective coverings for every item in storage.
REPORT NOS.50-259/86>>08, 50-260/86-08, AND 50-296/86-08
: 3. Corrective Ste   s Which Have Been Taken and     Results Achieved Employee meetings held at the Engineering Change Notice warehouse on March 13 and March 20, 1986 emphasized the mandatory requirement that.
JOHN A.OLSHINSKI'S
protective covers be maintained on components, including piping, fittings, and valves, in accordance with ANSI N45.2.2-1972.
LETTER TO S.A.WHITE DATED APRIL 16, 1986 Item 1'10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion XIII and the accepted Quality Assurance (QA)Program (TVA Topical Report TVA-TR75-1A), Section 17.2.13, require that items in the gA program be stored to prevent damage or deterioration.
A walkdown   of the entire warehouse has been completed and any deficiencies in protective coverings have been corrected. The central receiving office has been notified of the violation and will ensure that shipments are properly protected before being, placed in storage.
The QA program commits to Regulatory
: 4. Corrective Ste   s Which Will Be Taken   to Avoid Further Violations A followup program has been developed that will require a designated individual to check components on a weekly basis for protective covers which may have inadvertently become unsecured due to such factors as material handling or weather conditions.
Guide 1.38, Revisi.on 2, which endorses ANSI N45.2.2-1972, Packaging, Shipping, Receiving, Storage, and Handling of Items for Nuclear Power Plants.Section 6.4.2(1)of this standard requires that items in storage have all covers, caps, or plugs or other protective
: 5. Date When   Full Co   liance Will Be Achieved Full compliance   has been achieved
closures intact.Contrary to the above, during a tour of the Engineering
 
Change Notice (ECN)warehouse on March 5, 1986, the inspector identified
S}}
that most stainless steel tubing (AMG 1384)and a solenoid valve (Contract Number 84PJ5-834065)
were not protected as required.Further visual inspection
also identified
additional
examples of items in storage that were not.protected as required.This is a Severity Level V violation (Supplement, I).1.Admission or Denial of the Alle ed Violation TVA admits the violation.
2.Reasons For the Violation A lack of attentiveness
to protective
coverings for every item in storage.3.Corrective
Ste s Which Have Been Taken and Results Achieved Employee meetings held at the Engineering
Change Notice warehouse on March 13 and March 20, 1986 emphasized
the mandatory requirement
that.protective
covers be maintained
on components, including piping, fittings, and valves, in accordance
with ANSI N45.2.2-1972.
A walkdown of the entire warehouse has been completed and any deficiencies
in protective
coverings have been corrected.
The central receiving office has been notified of the violation and will ensure that shipments are properly protected before being, placed in storage.4.Corrective
Ste s Which Will Be Taken to Avoid Further Violations
A followup program has been developed that will require a designated
individual
to check components
on a weekly basis for protective
covers which may have inadvertently
become unsecured due to such factors as material handling or weather conditions.
5.Date When Full Co liance Will Be Achieved Full compliance
has been achieved  
S
}}

Latest revision as of 01:19, 22 October 2019

Responds to NRC 860416 Ltr Re Violations Noted in Insp Repts 50-259/86-08,50-260/86-08 & 50-296/86-08.Corrective Actions: Followup Program Established Requiring Weekly Check of Protective Covers on QA Program Storage Items
ML18031A440
Person / Time
Site: Browns Ferry  Tennessee Valley Authority icon.png
Issue date: 05/12/1986
From: Shell R
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
To: Grace J
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
References
NUDOCS 8606020150
Download: ML18031A440 (4)


Text

TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY CHATTANOOGA. TENNESSEE 37401 5N 157B Lookout Place May 12, 1986 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region II ATTN: Dr. J. Nelson Grace, Regional Administrator 101 Marietta Street, NW, Suite 2900 Atlanta, Georgia 30323

Dear Dr. Grace:

BROWNS FERRY NUCLEAR PLANT UNITS 1, 2, NRC-OIE REGION II INSPECTION REPORT 50-259/86-08, 50-260/86-08, -296/86-08 RESPONSE TO VIOLATIONS Enclosed is our response to J. A. Olshinski's April 16, 1986 letter to S. A. White transmitting IE Inspection Report Nos. 50-259/86-08, 50-260/86-08, and 50-296/86-08 for our Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant which cited TVA with one Severity Level V Violation.

If you have any questions, please get in touch with R. E. Rogers at FTS 858-2723.

To the best of my knowledge, I declare the statements contained herein are complete and true.

Very truly yours, TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY R. H. Shell Nuclear Engineer Enclosure cc: Mr. James Taylor, Director (Enclosure)

Office of Inspection and Enforcement U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 8606020150 860512 PDR ADOCK 05000259 8 PDR An Equal Opportunity Employer 1 \

MEO I

~ ~

ENCLOSURE

RESPONSE

NRC INSPECTION REPORT NOS.

50-259/86>>08, 50-260/86-08, AND 50-296/86-08 JOHN A. OLSHINSKI'S LETTER TO S. A. WHITE DATED APRIL 16, 1986 Item 1

'10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion XIII and the accepted Quality Assurance (QA)

Program (TVA Topical Report TVA-TR75-1A), Section 17.2.13, require that items in the gA program be stored to prevent damage or deterioration. The QA program commits to Regulatory Guide 1.38, Revisi.on 2, which endorses ANSI N45.2.2-1972, Packaging, Shipping, Receiving, Storage, and Handling of Items for Nuclear Power Plants. Section 6.4.2(1) of this standard requires that items in storage have all covers, caps, or plugs or other protective closures intact.

Contrary to the above, during a tour of the Engineering Change Notice (ECN) warehouse on March 5, 1986, the inspector identified that most stainless steel tubing (AMG 1384) and a solenoid valve (Contract Number 84PJ5-834065) were not protected as required. Further visual inspection also identified additional examples of items in storage that were not. protected as required.

This is a Severity Level V violation (Supplement, I).

1. Admission or Denial of the Alle ed Violation TVA admits the violation.
2. Reasons For the Violation A lack of attentiveness to protective coverings for every item in storage.
3. Corrective Ste s Which Have Been Taken and Results Achieved Employee meetings held at the Engineering Change Notice warehouse on March 13 and March 20, 1986 emphasized the mandatory requirement that.

protective covers be maintained on components, including piping, fittings, and valves, in accordance with ANSI N45.2.2-1972.

A walkdown of the entire warehouse has been completed and any deficiencies in protective coverings have been corrected. The central receiving office has been notified of the violation and will ensure that shipments are properly protected before being, placed in storage.

4. Corrective Ste s Which Will Be Taken to Avoid Further Violations A followup program has been developed that will require a designated individual to check components on a weekly basis for protective covers which may have inadvertently become unsecured due to such factors as material handling or weather conditions.
5. Date When Full Co liance Will Be Achieved Full compliance has been achieved

S