ML20236W715
| ML20236W715 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Callaway  |
| Issue date: | 11/03/1987 |
| From: | Halverson S UNION ELECTRIC CO. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20236W713 | List: |
| References | |
| APA-ZZ-00645, APA-ZZ-645, NUDOCS 8712080183 | |
| Download: ML20236W715 (21) | |
Text
~
A :, l
.C .;
- -** j .. .- . Enclosure'"A" to ULNRC 1686' m, '
-- - APA-ZZ-00645-
-Revision 1 November l3,.19871 -)
~l NUCLEAR FUNCTION- -
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE. l APA-ZZ-00645 -l J
' SIMULATOR CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT
'l RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT 84/A//A//J PREPARED'BY COTT ~ ALVeyESed DATE 'lI /3 /07" APPROVED BY 'DATE //b
//
87
/ \
GENT co , .
ISSUED- T DATE ISSUED Il-b-77 : NOV 091987.
ACCOUNTABLE HOLDER
_'V This. procedure contains the followings- ..,
Pages 1 .through 15' )
Attachments through ,
1 Tables through- 1 9 '
Figures through Appendices -through 1
Checkoff' Lists 1 through- 1: '
I I
i 87120B0183 871130 PDR ADOCK 05000483 p PDR-
., 1
... _ _.____._i__i.____._____
-..+
- '.'g*
j i
f-
~
LAPA-ZZ-00645:
, .Rev.: 1 *d Table of Contents.
Section Page Number-l '. 0 ' . Purpose an'd Scope '
.1' 2.0 ' Definitions. 1 3.0 Responsibilities 2' . l]
3.1- Superintendent, Training 2 0 3.2 Superintendent, Operations' 2-
~
3.3 Superintendent, Outages 3 3.4 Superintendent,; Administration Records 3 1 3.5 Senior Training Supervisor, Simulator. Support 3 d 3.6 Hardware Engineer 4 3.7 Softwaru Engineer. 4 l 3. 8- Simulator-Certification Review; Group. 4 l 4.0 General Requirements. .4 4.1 Simulator Capabilities. 5 3 4.2 Simulator Environment 71 ;
4.3 Extent of System Simulation 8 0 4.4 Simulator Training Capabilities- 8" 5.0 Performance Criteria '9 l 5.1 Initial Conditions. 9 5.2 . Steady State Operation 9 5.3 Transient Operation 10 g l 5.4 Simulator Operating Limits 11 l 5.5 Monitoring Capability 11 q
'l 6.0 Simulator Management 12 J 6.1 Simulator Data Base' .12' 6.2 Simulator Modification 13 6.3 Feedback' Methods :13 -
6.4 Simulator Performance' Testing 14 7.0 References 15 j 1
l 8.0 Records 15
- l. Checkoff List No. 1 - Callaway Plant: Simulator. ,
j Certification' Check' List 4-Pages l
a i
-i--
l- : = LL
. . 4 s '!
'; APA-ZZ-00645
, Rev. 1 1
~
SIMULATOR CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT' l 1
1.0 PURPOSE AND SCOPE The purpose of this procedure is to describe the simulator configuration, performance criteria, and management system used to es- ;
tablish and maintain a sufficient degree of completeness and accuracy of simulation of ;
the Callaway Plant. It is intended that, in I meeting the criteria of this procedure, the l simulator should-meet the certification requirements of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
2.0 DEFINITIONS Definitions described are unique to the Cal-laway Plant Simulator.and do not apply to .
the actual plant parameters or equipment.
2.1 Critical Parameter - Those parameters that require direct and continuous observation to operate the power plant under manual control or input to plant safety systems. Critical parameters used at the Callaway Plant Simu-l lator are selected from the control room l technical specification logs.
2.2 Functional Test - A test indicating that a piece of equipment will perform its normal function. An example of this test is: de-pressing the open button for a valve switch actually opens the valve; a valve opening leads to a change in flow, pressure and tem-perature; the valve opens in the appropriate time frame; and the indicating lights agree with the valve condition.
2.3 Local Operator Action (LOA) - Those actions required to be taken by an operator from outside the control room in support of ob-servable changes in main control board indications.
2.4 Malfunction - Failure or degradation in per-formance of plant equipment.
4 m________._
,s APA-ZZ-00645 Rev. 1 2.5 Non-Critical Parameter - Those parameters not requiring direct and continuous!observa-tion to operate the power plant under manual control or that do not input to plant safety l systems. These parameters are typically l relected from the control room technical l specification logs.
2.6 Simulator Data Base - The " simulator data base" may be predicted data, plant design.
data, or actual Callaway Plant performance data which should be used as the technical basis for simulator operation.
2.7 Simulator Information Manual - The Simulator l Information Manual describes the simulation l system and how to obtain and use information .
l concerning hardware, software and operation !
l of the simulator. !
2.8 Simulator Document File - The Simulator Document File is a file containing the Simu-l lator Data Base used to document adequate simulator performance. Included in this I file'are such items as procedures and logs I filed in alpha-numeric sequence.
]
3.0 RESPONSIBILITIES I 3.1 SUPERINTENDENT, TRAINING In addition to those responsibilities'as-signed in APA-ZZ-00021, Conduct of Operations-Training, the Superintendent, Training is~ responsible for implementation of this procedure and verifying that annual objectives and goals are established to l achieve and maintain simulator l certification.
3.2 SUPERINTENDENT, OPERATIONS In addition to those responsibilities as-signed in APA-ZZ-00010, Conduct of Operations-operations, the Superintendent, operations is responsible for a periodic review of simulator performance and fidelity as discussed in section 6.3.
l l
]
~
. h ,
y.. .
9*-
' ~ ~'
.q
.APA-ZZ-00645
~'
',' 1Rev. ' ll :
^~
l 3.3~ SUPERINTENDENT,20UTAGES:
- In addition to those responsibilitiesias-- ,
signed in'APA-ZZ-00022;: Conduct of- .
Operations-Outages,-the Superintendent,-Ou-tages isiresponsiblejfor. forwarding.all Modification' Packages.tosthe' Training I Department for.simulatortimpact! review.
j 9
3.4 SUPERINTENDENT, ADMINISTRATION RECORDS. y
'In addition.to those responsibilities as-- ,
signed in APA-ZZ-00081,3 Conduct'of-Operations Administration-~ Records, the .q Superintendent, Administration-Records is j responsible for forwarding' plant data.to;the 1 l simulatoregroup per?section 6.1.- He will -]
l also~be responsible for maintaining certifi-- U l cation records. 7j 3.5 SENIOR TRAINING' SUPERVISOR, SIMULATOR SUP-PORT )
The' Senior Training-Supervisor?(STS),1 Simu-
, lator Support is responsible.for review of. H all Modification Packagesifor simulator-im--
pact, update of the: simulator data base,-im-pl.ementing modifications, performing annual
~
. tests and submitting all.requiredireports.-
The STS, Simulator,Supportf is responsible for supervision 1and scheduling:of; simulator' related work activities.
i 1
i 1
I l.
1
-3 :
u ____'___._ _ _ i ________.___i _i____.i_ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
____._____.____L.______ ;
l
~ ~
- .. ; -l APA-ZZ-00645- l
. Rev.- 1 i q
.]
.i 3.6 HARDWARE ENGINEER j
.1 The Hardware Engineer is-responsible for I coordinating work requests required to sup- l port the simulator, ordering the proper ]
hardware items,. verification of proper'in- '
stallation of parts received, and other
duties as assigned'by the STS, Simulator
. Support. Documentation of all hardware items through verification of operability is ,
1 included as hardware support. j l 3.7 SOFTWARE ENGINEER The Software Engineer is responsible for in- i stallation of all software modifications I made to the simulator, coordination of-out-
, l side software assistance, verification of l
l . operability and other duties'as assigned by l the STS, Simulator Support. Responsibili- l ties should ensure all software modifica- i tions are completed and documented properly. j l 3.8 SIMULATOR CERTIFICATION REVIEW = GROUP l The Simulator Certification Review ~ Group-l (SCRG)-is responsible for the annual review, )
l evaluation and acceptance of the Callaway .)
l l Plant Simulator Annual Report. The SCRG j l consists of members from engineering, opera- 1 l tions, licensed operator training, and the-l simulator group. 1 l 4.0 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS The Callaway Plant simulator is used pri- ,
marily as a training device to provide ini- I tial and requalification. training for plant i operators. The sin.ulator may also be used 3 as an examination tool. The simulation of the control room equipment, plant systems, l and plant operations shall be as' described in the following paragraphs. The extent of l simulation shall be such that the operator is required to take the same action on the simulator to conduct an evolution as on the Callaway Plant using plant procedures. The '
( l extent of simulation shall permit control of simulated transients to a steady state condition.
"* s.
, t . . .
'. JAPA-ZZ-Ob645
- , 'Rev. '1'
. 4'.1 SIMULATOR CAPABILITIES' The response of;theesimulator result'ing.from s
operator" action, no operatorfaction,:im-proper. operator. action,fautomaticiplant con-.
trois and inherent operating characteristics.
l- shall be: realistic to the'extentithat, z
within.the limitsSof-the performance l . criteria of section15.0, theLoperator~shall not observe a difference between:the' response of the simulator control / room in-strumentationiand the Callaway Plant.
~!
4.1.1 Normal-Plant' Evolutions j 1
l l The simulator shall be capable of simulating 1 continuously, and'in real time,' plant. opera-- !
'tions of the Callaway Plan'.t The' simulator l shall calculate plant system parameters cor .
responding to particular operating.condi- ]g tions, display these parameters on the ap- [
propriate instrumentation; and'providey proper alarm or~ protective.systemLaction, or both. The' minimum'~ evolutions'that the simu -
l lator shall1be ' capable 'ofnperforming, using only operator action; normal-tofthe;Callawayc
~
Plant, are-ias follows:
4.1.1.1. Plant startup -LRefueling to hot standby' l The starting conditions shall be: refueling conditions of temperature and pressure... o Filling and venting are not: required condi-tions-to be simulated.
4.1.1.2 Nuclear,startup from hotistandby to rated power.
1 4.1.1.3 Turbine startup'and generator synchronization. R 1
4.1.1.4 Reactor trip followed by recovery'to rated l power. '
J i
4.1.1.5 Operations at hot standby. .-
l'4.1.1.6 Load' changes.
1 4.1.1.7 Demonstrate natural circulation 1 capability.
-l 4.1.1.8 l
Plant shutdown from' rated Lpower.to cold-shutdown conditions. ]
o '
i l
\ 'N L .
f .
1
n ,
_,y .
- ? '- l
'. iAPA-ZZ-00645-
.- Rev; 1 m l 4.1.1.9' Core performance' testing.
4.1.1.10 Applicable operatorLeonducted:surveill'ance testing on; safety-related equipment or systems.
4.1.'2 Plant Malfunctions'
~
l The simulator shall be capable-of'aimulat - s l- ing,-in realltime,' abnormal and emergency;.
conditions resulting:from malfunctions demonstration',cinherent~plantLreponse-and functioning of. automatic ~ plant' controls.
Each type of accident: analyzed:inithh Cal-laway Plant Final Safety Analysis Report,.
that results in' observable indications on control room instrumentation, should'be'-
simulated.
4.1.2.1 Where operator. actions-are a function'offthe~
degree of severity of the: malfunction (e'.g.
loss of condenser 1 vacuum,sdegraded feedwater l flow,L etc.)'.the simulator'shall have ad-justable rates for the malfunction'of such ai range to represent the plant. malfunction l conditions. The remainder shall consistcof?
a variety of;malfunctionsfassociated.with.
the electrical,fauxiliary,~ engineered 1 safety--
features systems, steamJsystems.,-reactor coolant system, .and: instrumentation'and con-trol system. LThe malfunctions listed in l referenced 7.4 shall-be included. LThe simu-.
lator computer system: includes a list'of'all available' malfunctions.
l 4.1.2.2 The response of the simulator shall be~'com-pared to actual plant response-orfbest:esti-mate plant response of section 5.0.
4.1.2.3 Where applicable to the. malfunction,;the-l simulator shall provide to1theJoperator~ thel capability of;taking. action:to;recoverLthe-plant, ' and/or mitigate 1 the consaciuences c of l the malfunction; The4 simulation shallLbe capable'of continuingluntil.such time:that m' stable, controllable, and. safe condition is attained which'can be' continued toscold shutdown conditions.
. __ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ - - ._ _=_
_ n
APA-ZZ-00645 Rev. 1 1
4.2 SIMULATOR ENVIRONMENT 4.2.1 The control panels and consoles that are l simulated shall be designed to duplicate the size, shape, color, and configuration of the Callaway Plant. Face-front hardware-(i.e hardware located on the simulated control room panels to which the operator would have l normal access) shall replicate that in the ;
Callaway Plant control room. There may be minor dimensional deviation in the location l of components and instrumentation, provided l these deviations do not impact on actions to be taken by the operator. Plant information ,
l shall be displayed to the operator in the 1 same form that is available in the Callaway Plant; i.e., meters, recorders, CRT, etc. )
Controls, meters, alarms, recorders, swit- l ches, annunciators, controllers, plant com- I puter interface hardware, and abnormal oper-ations described in section 4.1.1 and 4.1.2 l shall be furnished in the simulator. These l panels shall be functional to the extent that control manipulations performed during normal, abnormal, and emergency evolutions are reflected in the simulator response, q 4.2.2 As much of the control room environment as )
l 1s reasonable and practical shall be simu- j lated (i.e. control rod step counter noise, l flooring, and lighting). Communication sys-tems that a control room operator would use to communicate with an equipment operator or l a support activity shall be operational to the extent that the simulator training supervisor, when performing these remote ac-l tivf. ti es , shall be able to communicate over the appropriate communication system.
4.2.3 operator aids, which are postings of ex-cerpts from approved procedures, manuals, or other plant documents must be controlled per the requirements of APA-ZZ-00105, operator Aids.
Jo ./
g APA-ZZ-00645L 'I
', Rev. -1: ,
H J
- a 4.3' EXTENT OF SYSTEM SIMULATION--
~
.4.3.1 The inclusion of systems of theLCallaway .
l Plant and the degree'of: simulation shall be' to the extent.necessary to perform lthe Cal-
-laway Plant evolutions described 11n 4.1.1 and.the malfunctions described in.4.1.2. It- )
l shall.be possible to perform these control' )
manipulations and observe plant response:as .]
- 1. 'i n the Callaway Plant. This shall-include .)
system' interactions.with other systems simu- 1 l- lated and shall. provide total system inte- .)
grated response. l 4.3.2 Those systems.that are remotely operated or that provide some. input.to'the main ~simula- g tion'model and are necessary_to: perform Cal :
laway Plant" evolutions indicated or observed 1 l l tin the main ~ control. room?shall be: simulated..
l l The student shall' be able' to interface' with-
-the remote activity in the same' manner _as in
~
the Callaway Plant. The simulatoriinstruc- 1 tor should perform remote activities using R l
Local; Operator Actions.
l 4.4 SIMULATOR TRAINING CAPABILITIES-J 1
l 4.4.1 The simulator shall. possess-a minimum capa--- 1 bility of 20 initialization conditions, in- J cluding a variety _of plant operating condi- > l l tions, fission product poison concentra-l tions, and various times in core life. 'A
-}
list of initialization conditions'istavaila- j ble on the simulator computer? system.
l 4.4.2 It shall be possible to conveniently insert-and terminate the~ plant malfunctions speci-
[ fied in 4.1.2. The simulator shall be capa-I ble of simulating simultaneously orlsequen-'
! tial' malfunctions, or both, if'these mal-l functions can be expected to occur:by design or operational experience. The introduction ]
l of a malfunction shall not alert the. opera- l tor to the impending malfunction in,any man-' 1 ner other than would occur in'the Callaway: I Plant.
~l l
l' l
u
l' APA-ZZ-00645 Rev. 1 1
.j I
1 l 4.4.3- The simulator.shall have the capability to l l freeze simulation. In addition, considera- j l tion should-be given to. incorporation of run i in. fast time, run-in slow time, back track,
. y and write snapshots.
y l 4.4.4 The capability shall be provided-for the i simulator instructor'to act'in the capacity of equipment operator or other operators remote from the control room :(i.e. change-the operating condition of valves, breakers, or other devices).
5.0 PERFORMANCE CRITERIA !
4 l The Callaway Plant timulator shall present. l to an operator quantitative values of plant parameters within the tolerance specified below for those conditions that the simula-tor is designed to simulate.
5.1 INITIAL-CONDITIONS Initial conditions on the simulator must be compared.to plant data to' validate'the.
starting point for steady state and tran-sient-operation. ' Differences of. greater than 10% of meter scale should be. evaluated.
for potential impact:on desired training.
5.2 STEADY STATE OPERATIONS-L l The simulator accuracies shall be related to.
l rated full power values and interim power l levels for which valid reference plant;in .
l formation is available. The parameters displayed on the control-panels may have'the instrument' error added to the computed values. Testing will be performed as.
described in section 6.4.
l 5.2.1 The simulator instrument error shall.be no greater than that of the comparable. meter, I transducer and related instrument' system of.
the Callaway Plant.
.g.
APA-ZZ-00645
', Rev. 1
.~
l 5.2.2 Principal mass and energy balances shall be satisfied. Examples are found in' reference l 7.4. The aimulator computed values for l l steady state full power operation shall not I change (drift) by more than 12% over a 60 minute period.
5.2.3 The simulator computed values of critical parameters, designated by the STS, Simulator l Support, shall agree within 12% of the Cal- ;
laway Plant parameters. Critical parameters will be selected, for each steady state 1 operation, from the control room technical i l specification logs.
1 5.2.4 The calculated values of noncritical ;
parameters pertinent to plant operation, that are included on the simulator control l room panels, shall agree with the Callaway Plant within 110% or will not detract from training.
5.3 TRANSIENT OPERATION l 5.3.1 Tests shall be conducted to prove the capa-bility of the simulator to perform correctly during thoae evolutions identified in 4.1.1 and 4.1.2. Acceptance criteria for these l tests shall, where applicable,.be within the i limits of the plant test procedure accept- l ance criteria. Observable changes in the-I parameters shall correspond in direction to I those expected and shall not violate the l laws of nature. The simulator shall not i fail to cause an alarm or trip, and conver-l sely, the simulator shall not alarm or trip if the Calle.way Plant would not alarm or trip.
5.3.2 Malfunctions and transients not tested in I accordance with 5.3.1 shall be tested and compared to best estimate analysis or other i available information and shall require that l the cbservable change in the parameters cor -
l respond in direction to those expected from l a best estimate _for the simulated transient -
l and do not violate the physical laws of l nature.
__ O
.l APA-ZZ-00645
.Rev. 1-
.5.3.3 Parameters to'be monitored during transient operation'will be selected from the paramet-ers available on the_ Safety Parameter-Display System.
l 5.4 SIMULATOR OPERATING LIMITS l The simulator instructor-will'be' alerted-l when parameters may'be approaching values l indicative of events beyond the implemented:-
l model or known plant behavior _by amber or.
l red parameter values.or. messages incthe mes-l sage _ area on'the Safety Parameter Display l System. ,
l 5.5 MONITORING CAPABILITY.
l Parameters may be monitored on-the CRTf l screen,.-trend recorders,1 brush recorder or:
l line printer. -Through transfer.of data to-l other available computerfsystems,: parameter l data may also be graphed or. plotted.
_ - _ = - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ - _ _ .
APA-ZZ-00645 Rev. 1
~
6.0 SIMULATOR MANAGEMENT l A simulator monthly schedule is used to help coordinate training and maintenance needs of ,
the simulator. Annual objectives and goals o are set to ensure changes made to the Cal- i laway Plant are incorporated into the l simulator. Simulator modifications shall be l made within twelve months of the plant change. Priorities are assigned per TDP-ZZ-00013, Callaway Simulator Modifica -
tions, and are used to guide work on items needing immediate attention.
6.1 SIMULATOR DATA BASE The Callaway Plant Simuletor was constructed based on available data of February, 1980.
The simulator data should be updated within l each 12 month period following certification l of the Callaway Plant Simulator.
l 6.1.1 Actual Callaway Plant performance data shall be used as the technical basis for the ;
l simulator. Data shall be obtained from '
Operations Surveillance Procedures, Plant Curve Book, Daily' Operations Logs, and spe-cific observed plant parameters. Completed Engineering Technical Test procedures, cal-culations, and predictions should be used to provide data not otherwise available.
6.1.2 The Superintendent, Administration-Records, upon request, must forward a copy of all ap-proved Callaway Plant test data to the Training Department. This includes hot functional test results and Engineering Technical Test results that are needed to establish the simulator data base.
6.1.3 A periodic request will be made for plant logs at various power levels to support the simulator data base.
a
o*. .
APA-ZZ-00645 Rev. 1
~
6.2 SIMULATOR MODIFICATION The simulator environment, controls, meters, alarms, recorders, switches, annunciators, controllers, and other components should be reviewed at least annually with the Callaway l Plant control room. Required modifications l will be initiated per TDP-ZZ-00013, Callaway l Simulator Modifications.
I 6.2.1 A modification made to the Callaway Plant is documented using a Modification Package.
The Modification Package is forwarded for Simulator Group review in accordance with TDP-ZZ-00009, Course Deficiencies. The STS, Simulntor Support should review a Modifica-tion Package for simulator impact within 10 l days of receipt and assi,gn a Simulator In-l- l formation Formal Tracking (SIFT) number, if i
applicable.
1 I
6.3 FEEDBACK METHODS Feedback from Training Supervisors, Superin-tendent, Operations, Shift Supervisors, Operating Supervisors, Reactor Operators and other trainees will be evaluated and appro-priate modifications made to the simulator.
Modification Requests, CA-#588, or Training Field Reports are used as the mechanism for feedback. Training Field. Reports are described in TDP-ZZ-00009, Course
- Deficiencies. This feedback includes iden-tified problems with the simulator and recommended additional simulator capabilities. Modifications and simulator fidelity should be reviewed by the Training and Operations Departments at the Manager's Training Conference as described in I TDP-ZZ-00005, Instructional System Design, l'
l l- _
l l
4
, + .
g APA-ZZ-00645
', Rev. 1
~
6.4 SIMULATOR PERFORMANCE TESTING Simulator performance tests'are used to verify satisfactory simulation of the Cal-laway Plant. The simulator group conducts the necessary research to prepare the simu-lator test, performs the test, and compares the simulator response with the simulator data base, within the requirements of-the performance criteria described in l section 5.0. These performance tests are l used to certify the Callaway Plant-l simulator. Tests are documented using the l Simulator Information Formal Tracking (SIFT) l testing sheets and descriptions.
i l 6.4.1 The Callaway Plant Simulator Certification l Checkoff List will be used to indicate com-l pletion of performance testing. Items l reviewed on the checkoff list include:
l a. Environmental Evaluation l b. Real Time Verification l c. Initial Conditions Validation l d. Steady State Tests l e. Normal Operations l l f. Transients 1
l g. Instructor Incerface l l 6.4.2 A simulator certification review group l l (SCRG) consisting of personnel from en-l l gineering, operations, licensed operator l training, and the simulator group will I review and evaluate the performance of the l l Callaway Plant Simulator.
l 6.4.3 A document indicating completion of the per-l formance tests shall be assembled in an An-l nual Report and forwarded to the NRC for i review. This report will also include the j
l status of modifications made to the l simulator. Any uncorrected performance i tests shall be included. The status of l these items shall be specifically identified' l l in the next report.
i l
APA-ZZ-00645 i
.- R;v. 1 l l
i
7.0 REFERENCES
7.1 10CFR55
Operators' Licenses 7.2 Reg Guide 1.149-1987: Nuclear Power Plant ;
Simulator for Use in operator Training i l 7.3 NUREG 1258, March 1987, Evaluation Procedure I for Simulation Facilities Certified under l 10CFR55 l 7.4 ANSI /ANS 3.5-1985: American Nuclear Stan-dard for Nuclear Power Plant Simulators for Use in_ Operator Training l 7.5 TDP-ZZ-00005, Instructional System Design 7.6 TDP-ZZ-00009, Course Deficiencies 1
7.7 TDP-ZZ-00012, Simulator Operation and Main-l tenance 7.8 TDP-ZZ-00013, Callaway Simulator Modifica- e tions 7.9 APA-ZZ-00105, Operator Aids 1
8.0 RECORDS l 8.1 QA RECORDS l 8.1.1 Callaway Plant Simulator Annual Report l (T170.28) l 8.1.2 Simulator Information Formal Tracking (SIFT) l testing form and attached descriptions l (T170.30)
APA-%Z-00645 Rev. 1 Checkoff List No. 1 i Page 1 of 4 l
Person (s) l Completing Checkoff Initials l CALLAWAY PLANT SIMULATOR List (Print) l l CERTIFICATION I
l CHECK LIST I
I I
l Date/ Time Started l
, l Date/ Time Completed l
l ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION 1.0 Obtained latest revision copy of Callaway Plant Control Room floor plan. Floor plan is availtble l I
for inspection.
1.1 Obtained drawing of Callaway Plant Simulator con-trol room floor plan. Floor plan is available for {
inspection.
1.2 Compared differences between the Callaway Plant control room floor plan and the Callaway Plant -
Simulator control room floor plan. A list of differences is attached. ;
1.3 Compared lighting in the plant and simulator con-trol rooms. Differences are indicated on the at-i tached list. j 1.4 Communications systems available in the plant and
, simulator control rooms have been compared. Diff-
]
l erences are indicated on the attached list.
1.5 Furnishings in the plant and the simulator have :
been reviewed. A list of differences is attached.
1.6 Pictures of the Callaway Plant Main Control Boards I l have been taken. The pictures are available for inspection.
1.7 Pictures of the Callaway Plant Simulator Main Con-trol Boards have been taken. The pictures are available for inspection.
1.8 The control panels have been verified to be cor-rect as compared to the plant engraving list. The engraving list is available for inspection.
1.9 The simulator will support the plant computer keyboard functionc identified on the attached list.
APA-ZZ-00645 Rev. 1 Checkoff. List No. 1 Page 2 of 4
~
Callaway Plant Simulator -
Certification Checkoff List (Continued) 1.10 The simulator will support the plant computer l displays identified on the attached list.
1.11 The simulator will support plant computer trending 1 capabilities identified on the attached list.
1.12 The simulator will support the plant computer 1 alarm displays identified on the attached list.
1.13 Special features available on the Callaway Plant l Simulator are indicated on the attached list.
I REAL TIME VERIFICATION 2.1 The simulator time matches real time during normal !
and transient operations.
INITIAL CONDITIONS 3.1 For each initial condition to be certified techni-cal specification logs have been taken and are available for both the plant and the simulator.
STEADY STATE TESTS 4.1 20% Power Drift Tests have been completed. 20% !
Power Heat Balance Tests have been completed.
both tests are available for inspection.
_ 4.2 50% Power Drift Tests have been. completed. 50%
Power Heat Balance Tests have been completed.
Both tests are available for inspection.
4.3 80% Power Drift Tests have been completed. 80%
Power Heat Balance Tests have been' completed.
Both tests are available for inspection.
4.4 100% Power Drift Tests have been completed. 100%
Power Heat Balance Tests have been completed.
Both tests are available for-inspection. j l
3;., jf" 1
APA-ZZ-00645-
- -Rev. '1, _
Checkoff List'No. 1~ 4
~Page 3 of 4 l
Callaway Plant Simulator certification Checkoff List g
-(Continued)
~
l NORMAL OPERATIONAL l 5.1 ' Applicable operator conducted' surveillance'proca . .!
'dures on safety-related equipment or: systems were '
performed _on the simulator. Problems-identified.
.via' feedback from instructors andistudents are; 1 either corrected or-' indicated on(the: attached. ;
list. I J
5.2 Normal plant operations are performed during the 'l control board certification course. Problems- ,
-]
identified via feedback from instructors and stu - -l dents are'aither corrected or: indicated on'the~at- '
I
.tached list. I l
J
'l TRANSIENTS 6.1 Transients listed in: Appendix;B.of . 1 ANSI /ANS-3.5-1985 have been graphed on the j
simulator. The' tests have bean: reviewed:by the j SCRG. Problems identified have.either been cor- i rected or are identified onithe attached' list. 'l e
1 INSTRUCTOR INTERFACE 7.1 All MALFUNCTIONS listedLin ANSI /ANS-3-.5-1985 have -
been tested. The tests have been: reviewed by the i SCRG. Problems identified have either-been cor- .;
rected or are identified on the attached list. [
a
'7 . 2 Random selection testing has been conducted t'o:
validate the-operability of1 LOCAL OPERATOR l ACTIONS. The tests have been reviewedLby the
- {
SCRG. -Problems identified have-sither been cor- i rected or are. identified on~the attached;11st.. l 7.3 Random selection testing has been conductedito validate the operability offPLANT. PARAMETERS._.The'-
tests have been reviewed by the~ SCRG. 1 Problems identified hava either been corrected or are iden :
tified on the attached list.
}~ l
- 7. 4-Random selection testing has been conducted to validate the operabilityLof:the.BISTABLES. The-tests have been reviewed'by-the SCRG. Problems.
identified have either been corrected or are iden-tified on the attached >1ist.
_2_-_ -
g
. ? .,;
.6 .
Le "
7 APA-ZZ-00645
., Rev. 1 L~ l Checkoff List No.-1 Page 4'of-4 3
- Callaway. Plant Simulator-
-Certification' Checkoff List.
-(Continued).
l 7.5 An automatic testingfsequence.has;been' conducted:
to validate the:operabilityfof'the: ANNUNCIATORS.
-The tests'have beenl reviewed'byLthe SCRG.; . Pro-blems identified have either.been-corrected,or are *
-identified on-the' attached list.
.7. 6 - Random selection testing has been conducted'to.
! . validate:the;operabilitysof. COMPONENT OVERRIDE' .
The~ tests have been-l. reviewed by;the'SCRG., Pro-
-blems. identified'have either'been, corrected'orLare identified =on1.the attached-list.
~
1
)
l
. .l
< ~ ')
H l
L 1
1 ,..
_._.m._i._._._____