ML20137J744
| ML20137J744 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | McGuire, Mcguire  |
| Issue date: | 01/21/1986 |
| From: | Youngblood B Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Tucker H DUKE POWER CO. |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8601230178 | |
| Download: ML20137J744 (3) | |
Text
. -. - - _ _
4 Docket Nos.: 50-369 and 50-370 JAfl 21 1986 l
Mr. H. B. Tucker Nuclear Production Department Duke Power Company 422 South Church Street Charlotte, North Carolina 28242
Dear Mr. Tucker:
Subject:
Request for Additional Information Regarding Proposed RTD Bypass Manifold System Removal - McGuire Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2 The NRC staff is reviewing your request of October 29, 1985 for technical specification changes associated with removal of the RTD Bypass Manifold 1
System. We find that additional information, requested by the enclosure, i
is needed regarding radiological aspects of system removal and related radiological impacts on plant operations.
Your reply to the enclosure is requested within 60 days of the dr.te of this letter. Contact your Project Manager, Darl Hood, at (301) 492-8408 f f you have further questions.
Sincerely, ORIGIllAL SIGED BY:
B. J. Youngblood, Director PWR Project Directorate #4 Division of PWR Licensing-A, NRR l
Enclosure:
As stated l
l cc: See next page DHood JMinns NRCPOR" "
OELD FRosa LPDR ACRS (10)
NSIC EJordan PRC System JPartlow PWR#4 R/F BGrimes MDuncan RSerbu
/[]
)'/)f)[
BJYoungblood FBurrows DP)t.
P P
PWR-A PW@f4tDP4R-A P
J ka MD n
BJYoungblood
(
01/g/86 01//
/86 01/p/86 j!sR*"285ER8%3h9 P
JAN 2 3 gggg Mr. H. B. Tucker Duke Power Company McGuire Nuclear Station
- cc:
Mr. A. Carr Dr. John M. Barry Duke Power Company Department of Environmental Health P. O. Box 33189 Mecklenburg County 422 South Church Street 1200 Blythe Boulevard Charlotte, North Carolina 28242 Charlotte, North Carolina 28203 Mr. F. J. Twogood County Manager of Mecklenburg County Power Systems Division 720 East Fourth Street Westinghouse Electric Corp.
Charlotte, North Carolina 28202 P. O. Box 355 Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15230 Chairman, North Carolina Utilities Commission Mr. Robert Gill Dobbs Building Duke Power Company 430 North Salisbury Street Nuclear Production Department Raleigh, North Carolina 27602 P. O. Box 33189 Charlotte, North Carolina 28242 Mr. Dayne H. Brown, Chief Radiation Protection Branch J. Michael McGarry, III, Esq.
Division of Facility Services Bishop, Liberman, Cook, Purcell Department of Human Resources and Reynolds P.O. Box 12200 1200 Seventeenth Street, N.W.
Raleigh, North Carolina 27605 Washington, D. C.
20036 Senior Resident Inspector i
c/o U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Route 4, Box 529 Hunterville, North Carolina 28078 Regional Administrator, Region II U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
101 Marietta Street, N.W., Suite 2900 Atlanta, Georgia 30323 L. L. Williams l
Operating Plants Projects Regional Manager Westinghouse Electric Corporation - R&D 701 P. O. Box 2728 Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15230 l
\\
i l
a
JAN 211986 ENCLOSURE REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING l
RADIOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF RTD BYPASS MANIFOLD SYSTEM REMOVAL 1.
Describe the actual hardware changes and activities that will be made to j
accomplish RTD Bypass Manifold System removal.
Include those construction steps which result in occupational exposure to personnel or generate radioactive waste.
Identify differences, if any, in these changes and activities for the two McGuire units.
2.
Provide an estimate of the occupational radiation dose detennined for the overall RTD Bypass Manifold System removal project at McGuire 1 & 2.
This should include the following:
a) doses and manpower for major subtasks b) typical dose rates expected c) maximum dose rates expected, and locations.
3.
Provide a comparison of occupational dose estimated for task perfonnance i
i and dose to be avoided (e.g., reduced leakage and maintenance, ISI require-ments reduced, reduced numbers of shutdowns, reduced general area dose rates, fewer " hot spots" and crud traps) over plant life by removal of the RTD Bypass Manifold System.
4.
Identify measures to be taken to assure that doses to workers during task perfonnance will be ALARA. This should cover, for example, task planning, special training, use of mockups, area and system decontamination and airborne radioactivity, efforts to minimize number of workers, and applica-tion of experience from similar efforts in the industry.
5.
Identify the types and volumes of radioactive waste which are expected to be generated (e.g., piping, components, insulation), and discuss disposal plans for these wastes.
l 6.
associated with this task (e.g., special radiological problems which may be Identify and briefly discuss any very high dose rates, very high contamina-tion levels, high radioiodine levels, need for multiple dosimetry, brief stay times).
i l
l i
l l
i I
1
_