|
---|
Category:CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS
MONTHYEARML20217B3331999-10-0707 October 1999 Responds to 990825 Telephone Call Re Presense of Polychlorinated Biphenyl Wastes at Plant,Unit 1 ML20212F4481999-09-17017 September 1999 Forwards NRC Form 536 Containing Currently Proposed Site Specific Operator Licensing Exam Schedule & Estimates of Number of Applicants for Generic Fundamentals Exams Through Cy 2003 ML20212F7051999-09-14014 September 1999 Forwards Rev 19 to Ipn,Units 1 & 2 Physical Security Plan. Plan Withheld,Per 10CFR2.790(d) & 73.21 ML20211N0681999-09-0202 September 1999 Informs That Commission Requested Publication of Notice of Consideration of Issuance of Amend to Fol,Proposed NSHC Determination & Opportunity for Hearing. Amend Changes Senior Reactor License Requirement for Operations Manager ML20211H6291999-08-26026 August 1999 Forwards NPDES Discharge Monitoring Rept for July 1999 for Indian Point,Units 1,2 & 3. Rept of Noncompliance Is Attached for Noncompliance Which Occurred at Unit 3 ML20211E1531999-08-18018 August 1999 Forwards Semi Annual fitness-for-duty Program Performance Data for 990101-990630,IAW 10CFR26.71(d) ML20211H6051999-08-18018 August 1999 Forwards Rev 8 to Security Force Training & Qualification Plan, for Indian Point 3 Nuclear Power Plant.Rev Facilitates Transition of Duty Weapons Carried by Security Force Members from Revolvers to Semiautomatic Pistols ML20211A9241999-08-11011 August 1999 Informs That IPS Currently Estimates,That Approx Two Licensing Actions Will Be Submitted to NRC During Remainder of 1999 NRC Fiscal Yr & Approx Ten Will Be Submitted During 2000 NRC Fiscal Yr ML20210M7251999-07-26026 July 1999 Forwards Projection of Ability to Pay Retrospective Premium Adjustment for Period of Aug 1999 to 000731, Which Demonstrates That Ceny Will Have Sufficient Cash Flow &/Or Cash Reserve Available Throughout Period to Pay Premium ML20210G8911999-07-20020 July 1999 Forwards Application for Amend to License DPR-5 for Proposed New TS 3.2.1.i,revising Senior Reactor License Requirement for Operations Manager ML20209B6611999-06-29029 June 1999 Returns Recently Submitted Renewal Applications,Nrc Form 398,for Three Reactor Operators,As They Are Not Completed Properly.List of Docket Numbers & Block Numbers That Contain Incorrect Info & Block Numbers Not Completed.Without Encls ML20196A6371999-06-15015 June 1999 Forwards Rev 19 to Physical Security Plan.Rev Withheld,Per 10CFR2.790(d) & 73.21 ML20207D1861999-05-27027 May 1999 Informs That Effective 990328,NRC Office of NRR Underwent Reorganization.Mt Masnik Section Chief for Indian Point Station,Unit 1.JL Minns Remains Primary Contact for All Routine Licensing & Administrative Matters.Chart Encl ML20205R1981999-04-15015 April 1999 Requests That Dept of Environ Conservation Modify SPDES Permit for IPS IAW Proposed Rev Attached & Described as Listed ML20205R2961999-04-15015 April 1999 Forwards Copy of Proposed Change to Indian Point SPDES Permit NY0004472.Proposed Change Requests Permission to Add Permitted Outfall to Plant as Well as Change Character of Existing Outfall.Without Encl ML20196K8111999-03-31031 March 1999 Forwards Decommissioning Funding Status Rept for Indian Point,Units 1 & 2 Through 981231 ML20205F9711999-03-25025 March 1999 Informs That Under Separate Cover,Licensee Transmitted to Ofc of Nuclear Regulatory Research Annual Rept of Results of Individual Monitoring at Indian Point,Units 1 & 2,for CY98 ML20204F7931999-03-17017 March 1999 Forwards Table Outlining Nuclear Property Insurance Which Has Been Placed on Behalf of Consolidated Edison Co of Ny, Inc.Insurance Covers Indian Point,Units 1 & 2 ML20204J9971999-03-0909 March 1999 Forwards Insp Rept 50-003/98-19 on 981130-990222.No Violations Noted ML20203B9001999-02-0808 February 1999 First Partial Response to FOIA Request for Documents. Forwards Documents Listed in App a Already Available in PDR, Documents in App B Released in Entirety & Documents in App C Being Withheld in Part (Ref Exemption 6) ML20202J6171999-02-0505 February 1999 Forwards Transcript from 990120 Public Meeting Held in Peekskill,Ny Re Decommissioning ML20199H3731999-01-11011 January 1999 Informs That T Schmeiser,Con Ed Plant Manager for Plant Is Retiring,Effective 990111.AA Blind Will Assume Duties & Responsibilities of Plant Manager Until Replacement Named ML20198E9561998-12-21021 December 1998 Forwards Order Prohibiting Involvement in NRC Licensed Activities Re Deliberate Misconduct in Violation of Regulation When False Info Was Provided to Two NRC Licensees ML20198C2371998-12-15015 December 1998 Ltr Contract:Task Order 237, Review & Evaluation of Indian Point 3 Nuclear Power Plant Application for Conversion to Improved TS, Under Contract NRC-03-95-026 ML20198C4911998-12-11011 December 1998 Forwards Rev 18 to Physical Security Plan,Reflecting Organizational Changes & Incorporating Administrative Corrections & Clarifications.Encl Withheld ML20198C3251998-12-11011 December 1998 Responds to ,Responding to NRC Ltr Re Concerns Raised About Potential Chilling Effect from Temp Denial of Site Access to Employee Raising Safety Issues to Util Senior Mgt ML20155H2901998-11-0303 November 1998 Responds to to Lj Callan Expressing Concern About Continued Operation of Indian Point Nuclear Generating Station.Explanation Why NRC Do Not Think Revoking OLs for Indian Point Units 2 & 3 Justified,Provided ML20155F9181998-10-28028 October 1998 Forwards Changes to SPDES Permit,Removing Requirement to Monitor Svc Boiler Blowdown for Phosphates,Eliminate Redundant Sampling of Oil or Grease Entering Flow Tributary to Floor Drains,Per Ts,App B,Section 3.2 ML20155D2791998-10-23023 October 1998 Forwards Corrected Pages for Indian Point Annual Radiological Environ Operating Rept for 1997 ML20154Q1761998-10-21021 October 1998 Second Final Response to FOIA Request for Documents. Documents Listed in App C Being Withheld in Part (Ref FOIA Exemption 7) ML20154L8031998-10-16016 October 1998 Ack Receipt of & Payment in Amount of $55,000 in Electronic Funds for Civil Penalty Proposed by NRC in .Corrective Actions Will Be Examined During Future Insp ML20155H3021998-09-24024 September 1998 Urges NRC to Revoke Operating Licenses for Indian Point Nuclear Generating Station,Units 2 & 3 & Not Renew OL for Unit 1 ML20154A1391998-09-22022 September 1998 Informs That Effective 980724,AA Blind Assumed Position of Vice President,Nuclear Power & Ja Baumstark Assumed Position of Vice President,Nuclear Power Engineering,Effective 980813 ML20153F0661998-09-18018 September 1998 Provides Response to Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-286/98-05 & Proposed Imposition of Civil Penalty Dtd 980819.Corrective Actions:Existing Drawings for Spare Switchgear Cubicles Have Been Revised ML20151W4871998-09-10010 September 1998 Informs That as Part of NRC Probabilistic Risk Assessment Implementation Plan,Commission Assigned Two Senior Reactor Analysts (Sras) to Each Regional Ofc.T Shedlosky & J Trapp Has Been Assigned as SRAs for Region I ML20151W9511998-09-10010 September 1998 Informs That as Part of NRC PRA Implementation Plan, Commission Has Assigned Two Senior Reactor Analysts (Sras) to Regional Ofc.T Shedlosky & J Trapp Has Been Assigned SRAs Duties for Region I ML20155F4391998-08-26026 August 1998 Forwards Demand for Info,Being Issued to Enable NRC to Fully Understand Recipient Views on Facts & Circumstances Surrounding Allegedly False Info Provided to Two NRC-licensed Activities ML20238F5151998-08-26026 August 1998 First Partial Response to FOIA Request for Documents. Documents Listed in App a Being Released in Entirety. Documents Listed in App B Being Withheld in Part (Ref FOIA Exemption 6) IR 05000286/19980051998-08-19019 August 1998 Discusses Insp Rept 50-286/98-05 on 980528-0612 & Forwards NOV & Proposed Imposition of Civil Penalty in Amount of $55,000.Most Significant Violation Involved Failure, Following Design Mod in Oct 1997 ML20237B1001998-08-0505 August 1998 Responds to NRC Re Violations Noted in Insp Repts 50-247/97-13,50-247/97-15,50-247/98-02 & Investigation Rept 1-97-038,respectively.Corrective Actions:Acted Promptly to Assure Conforming to Testing Requirements ML20236X8511998-07-31031 July 1998 Forwards Rept Re Projection of Ability to Pay Retrospective Premium Adjustment for Period 980801-990731,per 10CFR140.21 ML20236V4211998-07-13013 July 1998 Forwards SER Approving Topical Repts WCAP-14333P & WCAP-14334NP (Proprietary & non-propiretary, PRA of RPS & ESFAS Test Times & Completion Times ML20236Q1431998-07-0808 July 1998 Responds to Administrative Ltr 98-03 Re Operating Reactor Licensing Action Estimates IR 05000247/19970131998-07-0606 July 1998 Discusses Insp Repts 50-247/97-13,50-247/97-15 & 50-247/98-02 & Forwards Notice of Violation & Proposed Imposition of Civil Penalty in Amount of $110,000 ML20238F5231998-06-29029 June 1998 FOIA Request for Documents Re NRC Office of Investigation Rept 1-97-038,meeting Minutes of Summary of Enforcement Conference on 980506 & Meeting Minutes or Summary of 980520 Predecisional Enforcement Conference ML20154Q1831998-06-29029 June 1998 FOIA Request for Documents Re NRC OI Rept 1-97-038,meeting Minutes of Summary of Enforcement Conference on 980506 & Meeting Minutes or Summary of 980520 Predecisional Enforcement Conference ML20236J9871998-06-24024 June 1998 First Final Response to FOIA Request for Documents.Documents Listed in App a Already Available in Pdr.Documents Listed in App B Being Released in Entirety ML20248F2891998-05-26026 May 1998 Ltr Contract:Task Order 8, Indian Point 2,A/E Follow-up Insp, Under Contract NRC-03-98-021 ML20248L9861998-05-21021 May 1998 Forwards Rev 7 to Security Force Training & Qualification Plan.Review to Verify Receipt of Revised Plan & Sign & Return Receipt Ack Form Provided ML20247M6951998-05-20020 May 1998 Forwards RAI Re GL 96-06, Assurance of Equipment Operability & Containment Integrity During Design-Basis Accident Conditions, for Plant,Unit 2 1999-09-02
[Table view] Category:INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE
MONTHYEARML20212F4481999-09-17017 September 1999 Forwards NRC Form 536 Containing Currently Proposed Site Specific Operator Licensing Exam Schedule & Estimates of Number of Applicants for Generic Fundamentals Exams Through Cy 2003 ML20212F7051999-09-14014 September 1999 Forwards Rev 19 to Ipn,Units 1 & 2 Physical Security Plan. Plan Withheld,Per 10CFR2.790(d) & 73.21 ML20211H6051999-08-18018 August 1999 Forwards Rev 8 to Security Force Training & Qualification Plan, for Indian Point 3 Nuclear Power Plant.Rev Facilitates Transition of Duty Weapons Carried by Security Force Members from Revolvers to Semiautomatic Pistols ML20211E1531999-08-18018 August 1999 Forwards Semi Annual fitness-for-duty Program Performance Data for 990101-990630,IAW 10CFR26.71(d) ML20211A9241999-08-11011 August 1999 Informs That IPS Currently Estimates,That Approx Two Licensing Actions Will Be Submitted to NRC During Remainder of 1999 NRC Fiscal Yr & Approx Ten Will Be Submitted During 2000 NRC Fiscal Yr ML20210M7251999-07-26026 July 1999 Forwards Projection of Ability to Pay Retrospective Premium Adjustment for Period of Aug 1999 to 000731, Which Demonstrates That Ceny Will Have Sufficient Cash Flow &/Or Cash Reserve Available Throughout Period to Pay Premium ML20210G8911999-07-20020 July 1999 Forwards Application for Amend to License DPR-5 for Proposed New TS 3.2.1.i,revising Senior Reactor License Requirement for Operations Manager ML20196A6371999-06-15015 June 1999 Forwards Rev 19 to Physical Security Plan.Rev Withheld,Per 10CFR2.790(d) & 73.21 ML20205R2961999-04-15015 April 1999 Forwards Copy of Proposed Change to Indian Point SPDES Permit NY0004472.Proposed Change Requests Permission to Add Permitted Outfall to Plant as Well as Change Character of Existing Outfall.Without Encl ML20196K8111999-03-31031 March 1999 Forwards Decommissioning Funding Status Rept for Indian Point,Units 1 & 2 Through 981231 ML20205F9711999-03-25025 March 1999 Informs That Under Separate Cover,Licensee Transmitted to Ofc of Nuclear Regulatory Research Annual Rept of Results of Individual Monitoring at Indian Point,Units 1 & 2,for CY98 ML20204F7931999-03-17017 March 1999 Forwards Table Outlining Nuclear Property Insurance Which Has Been Placed on Behalf of Consolidated Edison Co of Ny, Inc.Insurance Covers Indian Point,Units 1 & 2 ML20199H3731999-01-11011 January 1999 Informs That T Schmeiser,Con Ed Plant Manager for Plant Is Retiring,Effective 990111.AA Blind Will Assume Duties & Responsibilities of Plant Manager Until Replacement Named ML20198C4911998-12-11011 December 1998 Forwards Rev 18 to Physical Security Plan,Reflecting Organizational Changes & Incorporating Administrative Corrections & Clarifications.Encl Withheld ML20155F9181998-10-28028 October 1998 Forwards Changes to SPDES Permit,Removing Requirement to Monitor Svc Boiler Blowdown for Phosphates,Eliminate Redundant Sampling of Oil or Grease Entering Flow Tributary to Floor Drains,Per Ts,App B,Section 3.2 ML20155D2791998-10-23023 October 1998 Forwards Corrected Pages for Indian Point Annual Radiological Environ Operating Rept for 1997 ML20155H3021998-09-24024 September 1998 Urges NRC to Revoke Operating Licenses for Indian Point Nuclear Generating Station,Units 2 & 3 & Not Renew OL for Unit 1 ML20154A1391998-09-22022 September 1998 Informs That Effective 980724,AA Blind Assumed Position of Vice President,Nuclear Power & Ja Baumstark Assumed Position of Vice President,Nuclear Power Engineering,Effective 980813 ML20153F0661998-09-18018 September 1998 Provides Response to Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-286/98-05 & Proposed Imposition of Civil Penalty Dtd 980819.Corrective Actions:Existing Drawings for Spare Switchgear Cubicles Have Been Revised ML20237B1001998-08-0505 August 1998 Responds to NRC Re Violations Noted in Insp Repts 50-247/97-13,50-247/97-15,50-247/98-02 & Investigation Rept 1-97-038,respectively.Corrective Actions:Acted Promptly to Assure Conforming to Testing Requirements ML20236X8511998-07-31031 July 1998 Forwards Rept Re Projection of Ability to Pay Retrospective Premium Adjustment for Period 980801-990731,per 10CFR140.21 ML20236Q1431998-07-0808 July 1998 Responds to Administrative Ltr 98-03 Re Operating Reactor Licensing Action Estimates ML20238F5231998-06-29029 June 1998 FOIA Request for Documents Re NRC Office of Investigation Rept 1-97-038,meeting Minutes of Summary of Enforcement Conference on 980506 & Meeting Minutes or Summary of 980520 Predecisional Enforcement Conference ML20154Q1831998-06-29029 June 1998 FOIA Request for Documents Re NRC OI Rept 1-97-038,meeting Minutes of Summary of Enforcement Conference on 980506 & Meeting Minutes or Summary of 980520 Predecisional Enforcement Conference ML20248L9861998-05-21021 May 1998 Forwards Rev 7 to Security Force Training & Qualification Plan.Review to Verify Receipt of Revised Plan & Sign & Return Receipt Ack Form Provided ML20217F8501998-03-20020 March 1998 Forwards Table Which Outlines Nuclear Property Insurance That Has Been Placed on Behalf of Util,Per 10CFR50.54(w)(3) ML20199L9531998-01-26026 January 1998 Forwards Addl Info on Rev 6 to Security Force Training & Qualification Plan,Per 980113 Telcon Request of G Smith.Encl Withheld ML20199F7541998-01-21021 January 1998 Forwards Rev 17 to Physical Security Plan,Per Requirements of 10CFR50.54(p).Rev 17 Contains Summary of Changes, Detailing Changes Incorporated.Encl Withheld ML20198N1151998-01-20020 January 1998 Submits Status of Response to NRC Request for Addl Info, for Licenses TR-3 & R-93.Request for Commitment to Complete Decommissioning Activities by 2007 Has Been Persued Up Through Nasa Mgt ML20202F8281997-11-26026 November 1997 Reports Mod to Indian Point SPDES Permit as Required in Ts. Copy of New York State Dept of Environ Conservation Ltr That Modifies Permit Is Encl ML20198P7901997-10-31031 October 1997 Forwards Rev 6 to Physical Security Plan,Per 10CFR50.4(b)(4) to Meet Requirements of 10CFR50.54(p).Rev 16 Contains Summary of Changes, Detailing Changes Incorporated. Encl Withheld ML20198P3181997-10-30030 October 1997 Forwards Corrected Pages to Annual Radiological Environ Operating Rept for 1996 ML20211H7771997-10-0202 October 1997 Forwards Responses to RAIs 650.1 Through 650.8 Re Generic Issues & Generic Communications on Valve Testing & Valve Qualification.Westinghouse Status for Subject Issues Will Be Confirm W Pending Rev to Ssar & WCAP-13559 ML20211B4241997-09-19019 September 1997 Requests Withdrawal of Revs 16 & 18 to Physical Security Plan.Rev 16 re-submitted Per Provisions of 10CFR50.54(p)(2) & Deals W/Specific Operational Criteria of New Sys.Plan Withheld ML20211A9411997-09-18018 September 1997 Responds to NRC Re Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-286/97-80.Corrective Actions:Revised Administrative Procedure AP-3 to Establish Responsibility for Engineering Review & Revised EOP ES-1.3 ML20149J2491997-07-16016 July 1997 Forwards Environ Ts/Nonroutine Event Rept for Units 1 & 2. Appropriate Ny State Agency Notified ML20148S5731997-06-26026 June 1997 Forwards Response to NRC Re Violations Noted in Insp Repts 50-247/96-80;96-07;96-08;97-03 & Imposition of Civil Penalties on 961027-970405.Corrective Actions:Unique Tag Numbers for Louvers Were Generated ML20148J1431997-06-0404 June 1997 Forwards Rev 15A to Ipn Units 1 & 2 Physical Security Plan, Per 10CFR50.54(p)(2).Plan Withheld ML20137M8371997-04-0101 April 1997 Provides Supplemental Response to RAI Re TS Change Request 96-01 on Conversion to Framatome Cogema Fuel.Tech Specs, Encl ML20137A8301997-03-13013 March 1997 Forwards Response to NRC Ltr Re Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-286/96-80 on 961213.Corrective Actions:Expert Panel Has Agreed to Include Turbine Bldg & Power Conversion Equipment Bldg in Scope of IP3 Maint Rule Program JPN-97-008, Forwards Comments on Draft NUREG-1560, IPE Program: Persprctives on Reactor Safety & Plant Performance1997-03-0404 March 1997 Forwards Comments on Draft NUREG-1560, IPE Program: Persprctives on Reactor Safety & Plant Performance ML1004713451997-02-26026 February 1997 Forwards Proprietary & non-proprietary Versions of W Rept Entitled, Conditional Extension of Rod Misalignment TS for Indian Point 3. Authorization Ltr & Affidavit,Encl. Proprietary Encl Withheld Per 10CFR2.790 ML20135C7121997-02-21021 February 1997 Forwards Table That Outlines Nuclear Property Insurance on Behalf of Util Covering Units 1 & 2 ML1004713471997-02-18018 February 1997 Authorizes Utilization of Encl Affidavit by Util Re WCAP-14669,Rev 1, Conditional Extension of Rod Misalignment TS for Indian Point 3. Rept Should Be Withheld Per 10CFR2.790(b)(4) ML20134N6481996-12-24024 December 1996 Provides Further Details Re Corporate Reorganization of Consolidated Edison Co of Ny for Indian Point Units 1 & 2 ML20132C8071996-12-12012 December 1996 Forwards Check for $100 for Payment of NRC Invoice 7I0053 for Indemnity Fee on License DPR-5 for One Year Period 961204-971203.W/o Check ML20129D9611996-10-11011 October 1996 Forwards Controlled Copy of Plant Physical Security Plan,Rev 18,re Access Control Upgrade Which Adopts Biometric Hand Geometry.W/O Encl ML20117P6151996-09-11011 September 1996 Forwards Rev 9 to Security Training & Qualification Plan.W/O Encl ML20117E3891996-08-21021 August 1996 Forwards Four Copies of IP3 Security Contingency Plan,Rev 4. W/O Encl JPN-96-035, Informs NRC That Boraflex Not Used as Neutron Absorber in Either Util or Plant Spent Fuel Pool Storage Racks,Per GL 96-041996-08-0606 August 1996 Informs NRC That Boraflex Not Used as Neutron Absorber in Either Util or Plant Spent Fuel Pool Storage Racks,Per GL 96-04 1999-09-17
[Table view] Category:PUBLIC ENTITY/CITIZEN/ORGANIZATION/MEDIA TO NRC
MONTHYEARML20238B2771987-08-20020 August 1987 FOIA Request for Available Declassified Info Re Plant Ufo Sightings on 840614 & 0724 ML20206F3441986-06-0606 June 1986 FOIA Request for All Repts,Logs,Statements,Documents & Photographic Matl Re Ufo Seen Hovering Over Plant by Police Officers on 840724 & Repts of Other Ufo Incidents Near Plant from Jan 1983 - May 1986 ML20151Y7011986-01-30030 January 1986 Requests 3-month Extension of Deadline for Public Response Re Util Amend Requests for Facilities to Permit Safe Storage Status of Unit 1 Until Unit 2 OL Expires & to Extend OL for Unit 2 Until 2013 ML20154A7391985-12-23023 December 1985 FOIA Request for Documents Re Unusual Events,Possible Security Threats & Violations of Airspace of Site on or About 840724.Press Releases Encl ML20198M9631985-06-17017 June 1985 Forwards Allegations of Safety Violations of Nuclear Regulatory Law or Westinghouse QA Requirements.Investigation Requested.Related Info Encl ML20133M2751985-05-24024 May 1985 FOIA Request for Info Re Requests by NRC or Other Agency to Have Green Beret Personnel or Any Military or Nonmilitary Personnel Penetrate & or Evaluate Physical Protection Plans of Facilities ML20134D5881985-05-0808 May 1985 FOIA Request for Documents Re NRC Proposed Decommissioning Rule & Implementation of Rule to Decommissioned Reactors ML20106B1001984-09-19019 September 1984 Requests Independent Insp & Appraisal of Methods Used & Assumptions Made About Condition Re Flaw or Crack in Weld of Pressure Vessel.Related Info Encl ML20092J7281984-06-25025 June 1984 Expresses Opposition to Util 840409 Request for Exemption from Regulation Requiring Annual full-scale Emergency Preparedness Exercise.Objections Listed ML20091R9121984-06-14014 June 1984 Requests Staff Rept Re Licensee Request for Exemption from Annual full-scale Emergency Exercise Requirement.Commission Should Note No Assurance or Commitment Made That Participants Will Be Prepared for Nov Exercise ML20091E4091984-05-31031 May 1984 Expresses Position That Util Should Not Be Granted Extension of Time to Conduct full-scale Emergency Preparedness Exercise Until at Least 841130.Request Does Not Meet Public Interest Std of 10CFR50.12(a) ML20080D3001984-02-0606 February 1984 Responds to ASLB Recommendations Re Emergency Planning for Facility & County.Facility Should Be Closed Due to Inadequacy of Emergency Measures in Event of Major Radiation Release ML20086L3151984-02-0303 February 1984 Charges Commission W/Failure to Fulfill Responsibility of Assuring Public Safety in Event of Emergency Evacuation. Shelters Useless,Disabled,Forgotten & Plan Sadly Deficient ML20086S5941983-10-20020 October 1983 FOIA Request for SECY-78-569,UCID-19310, Review of PASNY Sys Interaction Study & Records of NRC Staff & Consultant Review of PASNY Sys Interaction Study on Indian Point Unit 3 ML20076E1431983-08-14014 August 1983 Discusses Problems W/Recent Evacuation Training & Emergency Plan Workability ML20076J0941983-06-10010 June 1983 Responds to P Amico Rept Re Recommendations for Addl Testimony on Pra.Reopening Record on PRA Would Unduly Prolong Proceeding ML20071P8831983-06-0606 June 1983 Comments on Governors Plan Prepared by Ny State Disaster Commission.Evacuation of Wheelchair & Bedridden Patients & Shelter for 1,200 Mentally Retarded Patients Overlooked ML20071P3241983-06-0303 June 1983 Expresses Views on Plant Emergency Preparedness in Light of Newly Submitted State of Ny Interim Plan.Conceptual Problems & Inaccuracies Identified in Plan for Implementing Compensating Measures for Rockland County ML20071P8641983-06-0202 June 1983 Opposes Facility Shutdown ML20077J5621983-05-26026 May 1983 FOIA Request for Preliminary Safety Analyses of Indian Point & Shoreham Plants ML20076F2131983-05-24024 May 1983 Requests Extension of 830609 Deadline for Planners to Provide Adequate Emergency Evacuation.Util Acting in Good Faith in Expressing Concern for Quality of Life of Community Residents ML20071G9731983-05-23023 May 1983 Supports Continued Plant Operations.Plants Should Not Be Held Hostage to Evacuation Process ML20071L5121983-05-20020 May 1983 Package of Two Citizens Ltrs Supporting Continued Facility Operation ML20076F2041983-05-20020 May 1983 Supports Continued Operation of Facility.Impact of Shutdown Would Be Devastating ML20071L4891983-05-19019 May 1983 Supports Shutdown of Facilities on 830609 ML20071H1791983-05-19019 May 1983 Supports Closing Down of Facility ML20071H1271983-05-16016 May 1983 Supports Continued Facility Operation ML20023D5591983-05-16016 May 1983 Requests Time to Speak on 830526.State of Ny Claims Unsubstantiated.Nrc Should Adopt Policy of Communicating W/Public ML20071G9241983-05-16016 May 1983 Opines That Decision Re Continued Plant Operation Must Weigh Health Effects of Replacement by Coal Burning Plants ML20076D0071983-05-15015 May 1983 Advises That Day of Reckoning Re Evacuation Plan Issue Coming on 830609.Interim Compensating Actions by FEMA Cannot Compensate for Unchangeable Factors of Problem Roads & Population Density ML20074A7361983-05-10010 May 1983 Forwards I Levi Affidavit Clarifying 830211 Testimony on Suggested Method of Making Sensible Probability Judgments Described in Section 5 ML20023B4211983-05-0202 May 1983 Proposes Alternative Views to Questions Posed in Sj Chilk 830426 Ltr to FEMA Re Emergency Planning & Evacuation ML20073G5391983-04-11011 April 1983 Forwards Intervenor Testimony on 830309 Radiological Emergency Response Plan Exercise ML20069D5091983-03-14014 March 1983 Requests ASLB Direct Pj Amico,Independent Consultant to Aslb,To File Complete Resume.Amico Raises Questions of Independence Which Must Be Resolved ML20071E4551983-03-0707 March 1983 Opposes Schedule for Hearing Evacuation Planning Testimony of Six Intervenors in 5 Days ML20083Q3821983-02-21021 February 1983 Urges Reconsideration of Decision Not to Hold Any Limited Appearance Hearings in Ny City During Wk of 830301-01.People Should Be Heard ML20065B8881983-02-18018 February 1983 Provides List of Intended Witnesses for 830301 Hearing ML20077K4531983-01-0606 January 1983 Forwards Ny Pirg 821207 Critical Analysis of Training Program Presented to Rockland County Health Dept on 821123 by State of Ny,Ofc of Disaster Preparedness ML20028C7701982-12-28028 December 1982 Requests Conference Call to Resolve Time Limit Dispute Re Depositions Prior to Delivery of Thompson & Sholly Testimony ML20070K4761982-12-27027 December 1982 Ack Receipt of Summary of Steam Generator Owners Group 820729 Meeting.Request Being Filed for Delay in Delivering Testimony on Question 2.2.1 in Order to Obtain Previously Inaccessible Info ML20070H3311982-12-16016 December 1982 Forwards Inadvertently Sent to J Hendrie. Attendance at 830110 Evidentiary Hearing Requested ML20070H3381982-12-13013 December 1982 Ack Receipt of 821210 Invitation to Attend Evidentiary Hearing in White Plains,Ny.Attendance Certain Unless Accident Postpones Hearing ML20028A5121982-11-18018 November 1982 Advises That Ny County Democratic Committee Passed Encl Resolution on 821118 Favoring Permanent Closing of Plants ML20028A4711982-11-15015 November 1982 Forwards Review of Radiological Emergency Preparedness Plans for Facilities,To Give Commission Accurate & Thorough Understanding of State of Emergency Preparedness in Communities Around Plant ML20027D5161982-10-29029 October 1982 Updates Rockland County Info Re Sirens,Emergency Equipment, Population Estimates,Finances & Procedures.Info Should Have Been Forwarded to NRC by Fema.County Resolution 320 Encl ML20065M7291982-10-18018 October 1982 Requests Destruction of West Branch Conservation Assoc 821011 Reply to 821001 Memorandum & Order & Substitution of Encl Version ML20023A7871982-10-15015 October 1982 Advises That Serious Deficiencies in Emergency Preparedness Will Not Be Corrected Since State of Ny & FEMA Not Addressing Concerns of Local Officials by Involvement in Current Changes ML20071M5171982-09-24024 September 1982 Forwards Petition w/17,000 Signatures Calling for Immediate Plant Shutdown.W/O Entire Petition ML20027B5771982-09-20020 September 1982 Package of Two Ltrs Requesting That Issue of Evacuating Population within 10 Miles of Facility Be Considered in Decision ML20069D6151982-09-20020 September 1982 Package of Three Ltrs Demanding Closing of Plant Due to Unsafe Conditions & Potential Hazards 1987-08-20
[Table view] |
Text
'
1, N
- E BRANCH COi3ERVATION ASSOCIATION ? " 'r r,
, &, 443 BUENA VISTKROAD
~
. NEW CITY N Y 10956
% June.g,u.83 19
/ , d, : g Commissioner Nunzio Palladino, Chairman Commissioner Victor Gilinsky Commissioner John F. Ahearne Docket No. 50-247-SP Commissioner Thomas M. Roberts 50-286-SP Commissioner James K. Asselstine Dear Commissioner We lost one of our County Legislators last week and yes-terday the County Attorney passed away. It is very possible that Mr. Herbert Reisman has not had time to review the
" Governor's Plan" which is the compensating plan dated May 27, 1983 put forth by the New York State Disaster Prepared-ness-Commission. Therefore, I am submitting some of a cri-4 tique several of us have put together.
At the time we cross examined Mr. Donald Davidoff, in charge of New York State Radiological preparedness under the Com-mission with such responsibilities, he was evasive and we found he had many holes in his testimony. Especially as regards quantification. No one has ever been able to say how many
- buses would be needed to fulfill the Rockland plan sent us by the utilities, nor the number of volunteers who would be needed in a best or worst case.
Mr. Davidoff did-not know what type of plan the Helen Hayes #
-hospital had to move its wheelchair and bedridden patients, it i a rehabilitation hospital for New York State. Nor could he explain what measures would be taken for the 1200 patients in the Letchworth Developmental Center (mentally retarded).
L We-had interveiws with the people in charge there and Mr.
Norman Szymanski stated.there could be no sheltering in the i basements due to their condition. However, he refused to testify at-the ASLB hearings without a subpoena because he is a State employee. The same goes for Dr. John Lindsay, the head of Helen Hayes hospital.
We decided not to press'these two fine gentlemen who are doing
! such good work. We are sorry now that we did not albeit we i so stated before the court. We don't enjoy forcing our good citizens. Had we then realized how important their testi-many might be we should have made other efforts to get it.
There is no plan for fast removal of their patients. We urge you t o find out just what is the plan by speaking to them, not to the proponents of this new plan.
Y TR 11344: 15-11345: 16, 11415: 17h1416:6 8306080200 830606 m PDR ADOCK 05000247 O PDR L
~
- f. ,_
Mr.Szymanski'splannecessitatesmovinghil3291entsa f great distance and it would be most difficult.
If you. read the mission statements in the new State plan you l will note that thos,e listed under Section II rely heavily on j the Division of State Police, subsections A, B, C,D, E, G, H, ;
J and M. Surely some explanation of how the officers would :
be transported, how many helicopters are available, how many l they seat, etc. should be in somebody's work papers. If not, l then we need to know how it can be assumed that there are !
methods of getting enough State police to help. There are not many stationed in Rockland County and Mr. Phil Schmer !
- stated he would expect help from them also, so that if two counties were involved there could be an even larger require- .
ment for personnel from the State Police including Orange.
Similarly we note the Office of Mental Health, subsections
. of II, G, H, K and N we question. During both the 1982 and i 1983 drills Rockland Psychiatric Hospital, under the direc-tion of Chief Grante of the Security Department was supposed to exercise the decontamination of people and buses. West Branch had observers at both drills and the effort was not
.even minimal. This year the pool wasn't even set up. We wonder how many personnel they could muster.E The State RERG should be asked to spell out their conclusions that personnel can be mustered.
We left with you a chart from the telephone book showing the map and the exchanges by zone designation which can give you an idea where some of the personnel whose phone numbers are listed may have to travel from. Other first three digit numbers do not appear ~on the chart so must be further away. ,
We.wont reiterate our arguments against the choice of shel-tering. Our providers state that people will % elf evacuate."*
We find the brochure page 20 odius. Since it is an annual booklet we know the claim to have saved 20 million barrels of oil is twice the figure it should be, with #3 unit down 14 months. As well as the claim of 20 years of service. #3 went on line in 1976, #2 in 1973, #1 fitfully before them and down for years. We don't like the propaganda.+
Section III, H. 6 does not provide for any traffic control on route 9W north of route 210. It would be very important to provide road blocks on 9W at each feeder road to provent people from going northward toward the plants. Has the State added up the number of traffic control points where at least one officer is needed? Will he have on him a radio that he can use to communicate to the substation should he need assistance?
s
- TR 11355:: 16-11359: 1. t TR 11332:20-11335: 24
~
~
Regrettably this letter continues - j Pages III-22 and 23 show an incorrect 1980 population, l j
short by 17%. Too bad we have to be ever vigilant but it is not our fault if the State persists in quoting through !
this substitute plan the Parsons, Brinkerhoff errors. The l State is aware that the population in Rockland County as per the 1980-census is 109,000 in the EPZ, not 92,993. We cannot i
understand why it persists in using the lower, 1970 figure. i 17% is not an inconsequential amcunt. Rockland County's ;
l L
draft plan uses the figure of 108,000 in the EPZ. j Of the,four counties surrounding Indian Point Rockland has '
two-special geographical problems unique to it. Its EPZ is 2/5ths its total population and about half its geographic ,
area. Westchester's EPZ has but 1/7 of its total popuhtion and far more resources outside the EPZ from which to draw. .
More publicly owned buses, more personnel not involved in ,
transporting their families and therefore more possible out- t side-the-EPZ assistance. Additionally, Rockland is,in effect, an island with the Hudson River to the east and mountains surrounding it on all other compass points, resulting in i a far more difficult road network for evacuation purposes.
The dependence on the use of helicopters is generally safe but there are times of the year when the weather grounds them.
It seems too risky to depend for monitoring teams on their helicopter travel from Brookhaven,as per page I-4 Page II-1, section II,A. " Initially an executive of Helen
- Hayes Hospital will assume this responsibility..." Our EOC has not been visited by such person and it should be estab-lished that such an important function is preempted, if it I
will be, by a person familliar with the operation of the Rockland County E00.
Attached newspaper clipping answers the quantification problem tyically. Plan asks for four telephone operators from Rockland Psychiatric and they advise they don't even l have four, let alone are able to lend four.
The TR references inserted in this letter refer to the ASLB hearing transcripts.
Other conflicts can be foudn by comparing the transcript of the Citizens Advisory Committee meeting of May 16 which Mr.
Reisman submitted to you on May 26.
Sincerely, Z. S. Fleisher xc: H. Reisman, E. Thorsen Secretary
--, -3 _
THE JOURNAL-NEWS, SUNDAY, JUNE, 5,1983 INDIAN: POINT C Continued from Al facilities cited an apparent Catch-22. ,
"We're right in the middle," said' Norman Szymanski, associate director at Letchworth. "Who's going to be here in the way of-staff to care for these t hworth has enough ehibes on' hand to trans2 port rpproximately half.of its 1,600 severely disabled patients, he said. An evacuation would be extremely difficult, Szymanski added, since one-fifth of the total are bedridden or restricted to wheelchairs. His facili-ty will cooperate with Rockland as it develops new
! plans, he said, but it is obligated to participate in the l tnterim state plan, as well as protect its staff and patients.
Terrie Goldstein, public relatioris director at Rock-land Psychiatric Center, knew little about Cuomo's
- plan. "They're still working on it in Albany. This
- hasn't been presented to us...It's just a plan, not a formal document." - ~
Under the plan, four of the. centets telephone cperators would be dispatched to Pomona..Yet Ms. >
! Goldstein said, "I am not sure that this is feasible. We T
( do.not have four telephone operators on (any) one
- shift."' , ; . ,
l And Val Brown, community liaison ariministrator' tt Eden Hayes, said, "You guys get (information) up there faster than we get it down here." She said all she knew for certain was that the hospital's chief ,
executive officer, Dr. Robert Lindsay, would fill in for '-
the chairman of' the state Disaster Preparedness
{
Commission until he arrived from Albany. Under Cuomo's plan, Dr. Lindsay would " assign missions and tasks, direct courses of action which control the'
- d. . SC rings one up' , ,
operation whatever the emergency, inform the public, T 38 y A ri c gl1 Ig% glllh and provide . resource continuity for .the response. G wa y wI E Gw IwV
.effortwithin Rockl.and m..
County." .
.- ,.~ 4 n. .'
NEW YORK (AP) - Except for some areas of Nassau, Suffolk, Westchester and Rockland counties, New York Telephone Co. service in the downstate area so far this year has been generally satisfactory,
< the Public Service Commission says.
Commission chairman Paul L. Gioia said Monday
. that 22 of the 44 central offices in Nassau County averaged more than 6.2 trouble reports per 100 telephones and called this "an unsatisfactory level."
. He added that only five troubles per 100 telephones were reported there in the first quarter of 1982.
As for Suffolk County, Giota said 10 of the 38 central offices had unsatisfactory levels of trouble, D compared with three in the first quarter of last year.
. In Westchester and Rockland counties, the chair-
]* inan said,13 central offices out of 56 showed unsatis-p factory levels of trouble reports in one or more
, months during 1983's first quarter. He added:
g " Staff reviews indicated that laxity.in central office maintenance routines had ::ontributed to the Q unsatsifactory level of trouble reports."
..m .. . _ . . - .
?
t . -% L 11244
/
1 Q. I want to discuss the subject. Do you 2 feel that we are, in Rockland, or even in 2 Westchester, in substantial compliance with each 4 of the planning standards with respect to those 5 that . apply to the disabled?
6 A.(Witness Davidoff) Yes.
7 Q. Have you read the testimony of, is it 8 Mr. Kaminsky7 9 A.(Witness Davido f f) I am not familiar 10 with -- I know who he is by organizational role in 11 the county. I am not familiar with his testimony.
12 Q. Have you spoken to Mrs. Northrop in e
13 nockland County, social services?
14 A.(Witness Davidoff) No.
15 Q. Have you spoken'to !!a l e n Hayes 16 Hospital, in Rockland County?
17 A.(Witness Davidof f) Yes.
18 Q. What is their plan for moving the 19 disablad?
20 A.(Witness Davidof f) I am advised by the 21 chief administrator of Helen Hayes Hospital, Dr.
22 Lindsay, that his~ staff has been fully trained in 23 relation to this plan, that he has adequate means 24 at his disposal to move patients when and if that 25 becomes necessary, and that if he needs additional TAYLOE ASSOCIATES
11345- ,
1 resources he will contact nis direct liaison
.l .
2 person who is. located under our state compensating 3 measures at thc Rockland Coun y e m. o r g e n c y centar.
4 Q. Has he any letters of agreement with 5 any busses?
i 6 A.(Witness Davidoff) I have no knowledge ,
7 of that.
8 Q. Is that the plan for Uclen Hayes 9 Hospital that you just described?
10 A.(Witness Davidof f) I paraparased it s
11 very briefly, but yes.
12 Q. How could they. move 200 wheel chair .
(] 13 patients, when we do not have that many wheel 14 chair busses? Have.you made any check of that?
15 A.(Witness Davidoff) No. I believe Dr.
16 Lindsay.
17 Q. So do I. ,
18 Page 13, please. Your next to last 19 sentence says, "After thorough review the 20 transportation --
i 21 A.(Witness Davidoff) Page 13?
22 Q. I am sorry. Page 9. I did say page 13, 23 didn't I?
24 A.(Witness Davido f f) Yes. I have located r*- g 25 the sentence.
Tex 6vu AdaccAArsd
\ .
' 112;; *
' ,g .
55 9 # .
1 Q. The'y are not looking for radiological 2 plans ---
<l 2
hf A. (Witness Davidoff) They are not at my D,. 3;_
5E?. 4 request.
fI. 5 Q. There are documents between you and
. 6 they?
(_ 7 A. (Witness Davidoff) Yes.
NE .
. 8 Q. You don't know what the status of hf 9 their survey and their endeavor is at this point?
l N.
SL 10 MR. CZAJA: It misstates the witness' Y:
14 11 testimony. He just testified as to what his EY y 12 understanding of their efforts were. I object.
E g:, 13 MR. KAPLAN: I don't believe that's D .
{ 14 the case. Then if it is, the witness will say the
[ 15 same thing.
i-I 16 JUDGE GLEASON: Was is the case?
r 17 THE WITNESS: (Witness Davido f f) What g 18 I intended to say that every hospital, nursing 19 home and health-related facility within the 13 20 mile Emergency Planning Zone had been contacted 21 sometime between March of l'982 and March of 198.3, 22 alerting them to their existing responsibilities 23 and calling those responsibilities to their -
24 attention and asking for a response from the 25 facilities. s
)
__m _ _ _ _ .
Y%/1@M [#%KF#
kh N NM -
-J
'5 ,j
. m.w g
ii L*
y 1 Q. . .p =
Do you know what responses have come y
ri 2 in? "
M
.n 3 A. (Witness Davidoff) No. 9U-
- f3 4 Q. Therefore, obviously you don't kn'w o f4
.'Q 5
whether the responses are adequate? t, 6 A.
(Witness Davidoff) That's correct. Mg n;
7 Q.- Let me ask you a question about a 8 different subject.
j iih You are familiar with the t e rm .g"9 9 ing e s't i o n pathway, I assume? .
[ !
y ;=
10 .IjR'i A. (Witness Davido f f) Yes.
11 Q. That's the 50 mile zone? -
12 A.
(Witness Davido f f) Generally speaking, 13 50 miles. '. -
i 14 % }
Q. New York City is within that 50 mile !
15 zone, can we agree to it? in gt r 16 A. ;'t. , O.
(Witness Davido f f) I think at least .ijy t
17 parts of it are. ' i. Ir E.
.d. .M
, r lo Q. A'1most all. ' li ti 19 Mr. Czech, do you know who L e o n a rd
' s.[i e E
?;
i Mk in 20 Solan is? (5r r.
if /;)
21- A. h.,sn (Witness Czech) Yes. j!; ;E 22 Q. WIFl Dr. Davidoff, I assume you know him? 'l 14 p.t
- 5 33 A.
(Witness Davidoff) Yes. ':l!
O ~
34 4 'i
. i Q. I guess you are both doctors? 1 25 i }]} ..
A. ;
(Witness Davidoff) Just two misters. 4
[.
____ _ -- - - - ____________ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -----------A-----
T ,
11355 1 County, and I want to know if he has read their l testimony. j 2
3 He said only one. And therefore I i l
4 vant to ask if he would accept that the other 5 three also do not agree with his statement.
6 JUDGE GLEASON: Well, I don't know 7 how he can accept that without reading their 8 testimony.
l 9 MS. F L E I S il E R : Well, before the 10 Public Service Commission we have a zinger that i 11 gets around those problems.
l l 12 JUDGE CLEASON:- Well, we don't have 1 - c=:-
s - 13 very many zingers here.
l 14 Q. Would you turn to page 147
( 15 A.(Witness David o f f) Tha t's where 'I am.
i 16 Q. Oh, I am sorry. Page 16?
l 17 A. (Witness Dav idof f) Yes.
18 Q. The very last line on 16, which then 19 dose on to 17, says, 'The State of New York has l 20 not made a specific study of the sheltering 21 capacity of the EP3."
l 22 Who would you expect to make such a l
23 study in order to determine whether or not
, 24 sheltering would be adequate for the public in the 4-l 25 EP27 a' A I L O E As5VGIATES
~
11355-1- A.(Witness Davidoff) I wouldn't expect e .
2 anyone to wake a survey, as such.
3 C. isn't this a terribly i=portant thing, 4 whether or not to shelter?
5 A.(Witness Davidoff) The kind of building 6 is a factor in sheltering decisions, yes.
7 Q. Why, then, would you assume that
- 8 there are enough dwellings, without making a study 9 of it?
10 A.(Witness Davidof f) I'd like to defer 11 further questions about sheltering to Mr. Czech.
I 12 Is that all right with you?
I
'h 13 Q.- sure 14 A. (Witness Czech) I think'tne key to 15 this question is what are we talking about in
- 16 terms of shelters. I gather from your question 17 that you are talking about a hardened facility l
18 similar to the Civil Defense type of shelters that I .
19 would provide protection --
20 Q. I am sorry, sir, no. In parlance, l 21 generally, I believe in this room, when we have 22 been talking about it, une sheltering has meant l
l 23 going into the basement of a priva te home or into l
24 the center hall of an institution, or crowding
! *t u 25 away from tne windows.
- j. TAYLOE ASSOCIATES
11357 1 A.(Nitness Czech) It still sounds like a 2 civil defense shelter.
3 The type of shelter we are talking 4 about will protect the people from the elements, 5 but also will minimize the air exchange. It's true 6 that if you go into the basement, if you have one, 7 or into the central part, that whatever radiation 8 would be external to the house, that it would 9 provide additional protection.
10 But the main part in the radiological 11 cmergency of this type is to minimi=c the air 12 exchange. The people in the.EPt have a dwelling to
{] 13 live in, and typically in the northeast, because
/
14 of the climate, we do have homes that are air 15 tight, so there is some protection just because 16 it's too expensive to heat unless you have an air 17 tight residence or dwelling.
18 Q. There are two exhibits, one I would
[
19 ask if you are familiar with because it comes from 20 a' ASHRA book, and that is a pretty standard thing, 21 where they state a change of air in the home tal es 22 place one and a half changes every hour or more.
23 Are you taking that into consideration in your 24 answer about the air tightness of the house?
L s 25 MR. FEINBERG: Your Honor, I believe TAILOE A5dOCIATt3
l 11353-1 the witness should be shone the book.
2 MS. FLEISHER: I will ask another 3 question.
4 Q. Do you know the ACHRA standard which 5 describe-how often an air change takes place in a 6 typical frame house?
7 A. No. I am not familiar with that. I am a familiar with a couple of discussions with the 9 environmental protection industry about shelters, 10 and that is one that talks about air excnanges and 11 types of considerations one would have te consider 12 whether shelters or evacuation might be the
(]; 13 protective action o f choice.
14 Q. Sir, you were the one who said 15 something about the air change or tightness of the 16 house. Right?
17 A.(Witness Czech) Correct.
~
18 Q. I would expect, then, that you know 19 what type of air change to expect when you 20 recommend shelter.
21 -
And also may I ask you do you know 22 what type of house is generally the type that 23 exist in Rockland County and ~4estchester?
24 A.(Witness C=ech) I don't have specific T_' s 25 information as to the types, just in general for 11359 1 two enw+wooe+ ena tha voz a nmro + e TAXLOU AbovGiATh6
6/ *
- 11332 I 1 Q. Will you turn to -- do you have a r
2 booklet with you?
3 A.(Witndss Davidoff) Pardon? t 4 Q. Do you have a booklet with you?
5 A.(Witness Davidoff) 7 think we do not.
6 Q. Right now I am talking about the 7 later one, which has now been called UCS. It would i 8 be WBCA number 1, and there is another one this 9 is a UCS NYPIRG number. It was evidently 10 introduced sometime.
11 A. (Witness Davidof f) Excuse me. Th'e 12 one that was handed to us is numbered 4.
- ( ) 13 Q. Yes. But it has been introduced into 14 the record as~UCS NYPIRG 14. Well, tha t's my 15 number on mine.
16 A. (Witness Davidof f) All right.
l 17 Q. I don't think it's that important. I
'18 am asking you to turn to page 20?
l l 19 A.(Witness Davido f f) Yes.
20 Q. Has Indian Point number 3 been shut ;
i 21 for almost a year now? 1 l
i
,, 22 A.(Witness Davidoff) I don't know. ;
I I
23 Q. When it says in the second paragraph,
[
24 "By using nuclear energy," and so forth. in l
u' u l
25 considering that one of the two plants is down, i
11333-1 you said you don't.know, I have to get around that V' .
L "" somehow. Will you take it, subject to check, that 2.
3 Indian Point h'a s not been on line, and therefore --
4 number 3, and that number 2, indeed, has been on 5 line some parts of 1982 and 1983?
6 JUDGE PARIS: Ms. Fleisher, we are 7 l o.s t . What page are you on?
8 MS. FLEISHER: 20.
9 JUDGE GLEASON: Chank you, Ms.
10 Fleisher-.
11 Q. Mr. Davidoff, will you take it
~12 subject to check that Indian Point is closed now?
f 13 A.(Witness Davidoff) I will check. It's
! 14 none of my business.
15 Q. Isn't it your business to be accurate i
I 16 in the literature that is put out?
17 A.(Witness Davidoff) Yes.
l 18 Q. All right.
19 Isn't it your business to know, i
l 20 t'herefore, that if half the amount of oil you l
21 proposed to save is not being saved, that you 22 should so state?
23 A.(Witness Davidof f) Absolutely.
24 Q. Well, it says in this booklet, and I
' s 25 am asking you to address it, the 20 million TAYLOE ASSOCIATES
O 11334 1 barrels of oil'being saved each year.
/", .
2 Now, I want to ask you, if one out of l
3 two of these f'airly equally sized stations is not t' t
4 operating, are you saving 20 million barrels?
-5 A.(Witness Davidoff) It could very well i
6 be. I know that the public information staff who i
'7 was part of our' group checked this entire document, 8 advised me that the document is accurate. If not, 9 we would not have signed off on it.
10 Q. Are-you stating, then, that 20
! 11 million barrels is an accurate number?
12 A. To the best of our knowledge, it is.
1
-() 13 Q. Now I ask you another question, then.
14 Will-you answer why this information is in this i-
- 15 booklet at all?
16 A.(Witness David o f f) It is optional, in 17 my judgment. We did not object to its inclusion.
t 18 Q. Does it help people to evacuate from 19 their homes?
20 A.(Witness Davidoff) No.
21 Q. Would one hope to make a booklet as l 22 short and concise as possible, and concentrate i
23 only on helping people?
24 MR. FEINBERG: Objection. The booklet l %~ y 25 is designed to do more than help people evacuate.
l TAYLOE ASSOCIATES
11335-1 Q. Emergency Planning and You.
j' S
~ ~
2 JUDGE GLEASON: Let the witness 3 respond.
4 A. (Witness Davidof f) Conciseness, in 5 and of itself, is not necessarily a virtue.
6 Q. Thank you. It is right now, though, 7 'in our answers.
8 On the back of it it says Four County 9 Nuclear Safety Committee. May I ask you why it 10 doesn't say Three County Nuclear Safety Committee?
11 A.(Witness Davidoff) To the best of my 12 knowledge, the safety committee, which was a loose
( 13 confederation of the four counties, still exists.
L 14 Q. Haven't you read some of the
- 15. resolutions that.have been entered into this case 16 as evidence by Mr. Thorsen from the Rockland 17 County Legislature, particularly, I believe, it's 18 number 320, May 15, but I may not be correct, in l
l 19 which it states that Rockland County is not a part, 20 shall not be a part, of that?
21 A.(Witness Davidoff) I did not know that.
, 22' Q. How many of these booklets have been l
j 23 printed?
L , 24 A.(Witness David o f f) I do not know.
A 4 25 Q. Have they been distributed all TAYLOE ASSOCIATES