|
---|
Category:CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS
MONTHYEARML20217B3331999-10-0707 October 1999 Responds to 990825 Telephone Call Re Presense of Polychlorinated Biphenyl Wastes at Plant,Unit 1 ML20212F4481999-09-17017 September 1999 Forwards NRC Form 536 Containing Currently Proposed Site Specific Operator Licensing Exam Schedule & Estimates of Number of Applicants for Generic Fundamentals Exams Through Cy 2003 ML20212F7051999-09-14014 September 1999 Forwards Rev 19 to Ipn,Units 1 & 2 Physical Security Plan. Plan Withheld,Per 10CFR2.790(d) & 73.21 ML20211N0681999-09-0202 September 1999 Informs That Commission Requested Publication of Notice of Consideration of Issuance of Amend to Fol,Proposed NSHC Determination & Opportunity for Hearing. Amend Changes Senior Reactor License Requirement for Operations Manager ML20211H6291999-08-26026 August 1999 Forwards NPDES Discharge Monitoring Rept for July 1999 for Indian Point,Units 1,2 & 3. Rept of Noncompliance Is Attached for Noncompliance Which Occurred at Unit 3 ML20211E1531999-08-18018 August 1999 Forwards Semi Annual fitness-for-duty Program Performance Data for 990101-990630,IAW 10CFR26.71(d) ML20211H6051999-08-18018 August 1999 Forwards Rev 8 to Security Force Training & Qualification Plan, for Indian Point 3 Nuclear Power Plant.Rev Facilitates Transition of Duty Weapons Carried by Security Force Members from Revolvers to Semiautomatic Pistols ML20211A9241999-08-11011 August 1999 Informs That IPS Currently Estimates,That Approx Two Licensing Actions Will Be Submitted to NRC During Remainder of 1999 NRC Fiscal Yr & Approx Ten Will Be Submitted During 2000 NRC Fiscal Yr ML20210M7251999-07-26026 July 1999 Forwards Projection of Ability to Pay Retrospective Premium Adjustment for Period of Aug 1999 to 000731, Which Demonstrates That Ceny Will Have Sufficient Cash Flow &/Or Cash Reserve Available Throughout Period to Pay Premium ML20210G8911999-07-20020 July 1999 Forwards Application for Amend to License DPR-5 for Proposed New TS 3.2.1.i,revising Senior Reactor License Requirement for Operations Manager ML20209B6611999-06-29029 June 1999 Returns Recently Submitted Renewal Applications,Nrc Form 398,for Three Reactor Operators,As They Are Not Completed Properly.List of Docket Numbers & Block Numbers That Contain Incorrect Info & Block Numbers Not Completed.Without Encls ML20196A6371999-06-15015 June 1999 Forwards Rev 19 to Physical Security Plan.Rev Withheld,Per 10CFR2.790(d) & 73.21 ML20207D1861999-05-27027 May 1999 Informs That Effective 990328,NRC Office of NRR Underwent Reorganization.Mt Masnik Section Chief for Indian Point Station,Unit 1.JL Minns Remains Primary Contact for All Routine Licensing & Administrative Matters.Chart Encl ML20205R1981999-04-15015 April 1999 Requests That Dept of Environ Conservation Modify SPDES Permit for IPS IAW Proposed Rev Attached & Described as Listed ML20205R2961999-04-15015 April 1999 Forwards Copy of Proposed Change to Indian Point SPDES Permit NY0004472.Proposed Change Requests Permission to Add Permitted Outfall to Plant as Well as Change Character of Existing Outfall.Without Encl ML20196K8111999-03-31031 March 1999 Forwards Decommissioning Funding Status Rept for Indian Point,Units 1 & 2 Through 981231 ML20205F9711999-03-25025 March 1999 Informs That Under Separate Cover,Licensee Transmitted to Ofc of Nuclear Regulatory Research Annual Rept of Results of Individual Monitoring at Indian Point,Units 1 & 2,for CY98 ML20204F7931999-03-17017 March 1999 Forwards Table Outlining Nuclear Property Insurance Which Has Been Placed on Behalf of Consolidated Edison Co of Ny, Inc.Insurance Covers Indian Point,Units 1 & 2 ML20204J9971999-03-0909 March 1999 Forwards Insp Rept 50-003/98-19 on 981130-990222.No Violations Noted ML20203B9001999-02-0808 February 1999 First Partial Response to FOIA Request for Documents. Forwards Documents Listed in App a Already Available in PDR, Documents in App B Released in Entirety & Documents in App C Being Withheld in Part (Ref Exemption 6) ML20202J6171999-02-0505 February 1999 Forwards Transcript from 990120 Public Meeting Held in Peekskill,Ny Re Decommissioning ML20199H3731999-01-11011 January 1999 Informs That T Schmeiser,Con Ed Plant Manager for Plant Is Retiring,Effective 990111.AA Blind Will Assume Duties & Responsibilities of Plant Manager Until Replacement Named ML20198E9561998-12-21021 December 1998 Forwards Order Prohibiting Involvement in NRC Licensed Activities Re Deliberate Misconduct in Violation of Regulation When False Info Was Provided to Two NRC Licensees ML20198C2371998-12-15015 December 1998 Ltr Contract:Task Order 237, Review & Evaluation of Indian Point 3 Nuclear Power Plant Application for Conversion to Improved TS, Under Contract NRC-03-95-026 ML20198C4911998-12-11011 December 1998 Forwards Rev 18 to Physical Security Plan,Reflecting Organizational Changes & Incorporating Administrative Corrections & Clarifications.Encl Withheld ML20198C3251998-12-11011 December 1998 Responds to ,Responding to NRC Ltr Re Concerns Raised About Potential Chilling Effect from Temp Denial of Site Access to Employee Raising Safety Issues to Util Senior Mgt ML20155H2901998-11-0303 November 1998 Responds to to Lj Callan Expressing Concern About Continued Operation of Indian Point Nuclear Generating Station.Explanation Why NRC Do Not Think Revoking OLs for Indian Point Units 2 & 3 Justified,Provided ML20155F9181998-10-28028 October 1998 Forwards Changes to SPDES Permit,Removing Requirement to Monitor Svc Boiler Blowdown for Phosphates,Eliminate Redundant Sampling of Oil or Grease Entering Flow Tributary to Floor Drains,Per Ts,App B,Section 3.2 ML20155D2791998-10-23023 October 1998 Forwards Corrected Pages for Indian Point Annual Radiological Environ Operating Rept for 1997 ML20154Q1761998-10-21021 October 1998 Second Final Response to FOIA Request for Documents. Documents Listed in App C Being Withheld in Part (Ref FOIA Exemption 7) ML20154L8031998-10-16016 October 1998 Ack Receipt of & Payment in Amount of $55,000 in Electronic Funds for Civil Penalty Proposed by NRC in .Corrective Actions Will Be Examined During Future Insp ML20155H3021998-09-24024 September 1998 Urges NRC to Revoke Operating Licenses for Indian Point Nuclear Generating Station,Units 2 & 3 & Not Renew OL for Unit 1 ML20154A1391998-09-22022 September 1998 Informs That Effective 980724,AA Blind Assumed Position of Vice President,Nuclear Power & Ja Baumstark Assumed Position of Vice President,Nuclear Power Engineering,Effective 980813 ML20153F0661998-09-18018 September 1998 Provides Response to Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-286/98-05 & Proposed Imposition of Civil Penalty Dtd 980819.Corrective Actions:Existing Drawings for Spare Switchgear Cubicles Have Been Revised ML20151W4871998-09-10010 September 1998 Informs That as Part of NRC Probabilistic Risk Assessment Implementation Plan,Commission Assigned Two Senior Reactor Analysts (Sras) to Each Regional Ofc.T Shedlosky & J Trapp Has Been Assigned as SRAs for Region I ML20151W9511998-09-10010 September 1998 Informs That as Part of NRC PRA Implementation Plan, Commission Has Assigned Two Senior Reactor Analysts (Sras) to Regional Ofc.T Shedlosky & J Trapp Has Been Assigned SRAs Duties for Region I ML20155F4391998-08-26026 August 1998 Forwards Demand for Info,Being Issued to Enable NRC to Fully Understand Recipient Views on Facts & Circumstances Surrounding Allegedly False Info Provided to Two NRC-licensed Activities ML20238F5151998-08-26026 August 1998 First Partial Response to FOIA Request for Documents. Documents Listed in App a Being Released in Entirety. Documents Listed in App B Being Withheld in Part (Ref FOIA Exemption 6) IR 05000286/19980051998-08-19019 August 1998 Discusses Insp Rept 50-286/98-05 on 980528-0612 & Forwards NOV & Proposed Imposition of Civil Penalty in Amount of $55,000.Most Significant Violation Involved Failure, Following Design Mod in Oct 1997 ML20237B1001998-08-0505 August 1998 Responds to NRC Re Violations Noted in Insp Repts 50-247/97-13,50-247/97-15,50-247/98-02 & Investigation Rept 1-97-038,respectively.Corrective Actions:Acted Promptly to Assure Conforming to Testing Requirements ML20236X8511998-07-31031 July 1998 Forwards Rept Re Projection of Ability to Pay Retrospective Premium Adjustment for Period 980801-990731,per 10CFR140.21 ML20236V4211998-07-13013 July 1998 Forwards SER Approving Topical Repts WCAP-14333P & WCAP-14334NP (Proprietary & non-propiretary, PRA of RPS & ESFAS Test Times & Completion Times ML20236Q1431998-07-0808 July 1998 Responds to Administrative Ltr 98-03 Re Operating Reactor Licensing Action Estimates IR 05000247/19970131998-07-0606 July 1998 Discusses Insp Repts 50-247/97-13,50-247/97-15 & 50-247/98-02 & Forwards Notice of Violation & Proposed Imposition of Civil Penalty in Amount of $110,000 ML20238F5231998-06-29029 June 1998 FOIA Request for Documents Re NRC Office of Investigation Rept 1-97-038,meeting Minutes of Summary of Enforcement Conference on 980506 & Meeting Minutes or Summary of 980520 Predecisional Enforcement Conference ML20154Q1831998-06-29029 June 1998 FOIA Request for Documents Re NRC OI Rept 1-97-038,meeting Minutes of Summary of Enforcement Conference on 980506 & Meeting Minutes or Summary of 980520 Predecisional Enforcement Conference ML20236J9871998-06-24024 June 1998 First Final Response to FOIA Request for Documents.Documents Listed in App a Already Available in Pdr.Documents Listed in App B Being Released in Entirety ML20248F2891998-05-26026 May 1998 Ltr Contract:Task Order 8, Indian Point 2,A/E Follow-up Insp, Under Contract NRC-03-98-021 ML20248L9861998-05-21021 May 1998 Forwards Rev 7 to Security Force Training & Qualification Plan.Review to Verify Receipt of Revised Plan & Sign & Return Receipt Ack Form Provided ML20247M6951998-05-20020 May 1998 Forwards RAI Re GL 96-06, Assurance of Equipment Operability & Containment Integrity During Design-Basis Accident Conditions, for Plant,Unit 2 1999-09-02
[Table view] Category:INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE
MONTHYEARML20212F4481999-09-17017 September 1999 Forwards NRC Form 536 Containing Currently Proposed Site Specific Operator Licensing Exam Schedule & Estimates of Number of Applicants for Generic Fundamentals Exams Through Cy 2003 ML20212F7051999-09-14014 September 1999 Forwards Rev 19 to Ipn,Units 1 & 2 Physical Security Plan. Plan Withheld,Per 10CFR2.790(d) & 73.21 ML20211H6051999-08-18018 August 1999 Forwards Rev 8 to Security Force Training & Qualification Plan, for Indian Point 3 Nuclear Power Plant.Rev Facilitates Transition of Duty Weapons Carried by Security Force Members from Revolvers to Semiautomatic Pistols ML20211E1531999-08-18018 August 1999 Forwards Semi Annual fitness-for-duty Program Performance Data for 990101-990630,IAW 10CFR26.71(d) ML20211A9241999-08-11011 August 1999 Informs That IPS Currently Estimates,That Approx Two Licensing Actions Will Be Submitted to NRC During Remainder of 1999 NRC Fiscal Yr & Approx Ten Will Be Submitted During 2000 NRC Fiscal Yr ML20210M7251999-07-26026 July 1999 Forwards Projection of Ability to Pay Retrospective Premium Adjustment for Period of Aug 1999 to 000731, Which Demonstrates That Ceny Will Have Sufficient Cash Flow &/Or Cash Reserve Available Throughout Period to Pay Premium ML20210G8911999-07-20020 July 1999 Forwards Application for Amend to License DPR-5 for Proposed New TS 3.2.1.i,revising Senior Reactor License Requirement for Operations Manager ML20196A6371999-06-15015 June 1999 Forwards Rev 19 to Physical Security Plan.Rev Withheld,Per 10CFR2.790(d) & 73.21 ML20205R2961999-04-15015 April 1999 Forwards Copy of Proposed Change to Indian Point SPDES Permit NY0004472.Proposed Change Requests Permission to Add Permitted Outfall to Plant as Well as Change Character of Existing Outfall.Without Encl ML20196K8111999-03-31031 March 1999 Forwards Decommissioning Funding Status Rept for Indian Point,Units 1 & 2 Through 981231 ML20205F9711999-03-25025 March 1999 Informs That Under Separate Cover,Licensee Transmitted to Ofc of Nuclear Regulatory Research Annual Rept of Results of Individual Monitoring at Indian Point,Units 1 & 2,for CY98 ML20204F7931999-03-17017 March 1999 Forwards Table Outlining Nuclear Property Insurance Which Has Been Placed on Behalf of Consolidated Edison Co of Ny, Inc.Insurance Covers Indian Point,Units 1 & 2 ML20199H3731999-01-11011 January 1999 Informs That T Schmeiser,Con Ed Plant Manager for Plant Is Retiring,Effective 990111.AA Blind Will Assume Duties & Responsibilities of Plant Manager Until Replacement Named ML20198C4911998-12-11011 December 1998 Forwards Rev 18 to Physical Security Plan,Reflecting Organizational Changes & Incorporating Administrative Corrections & Clarifications.Encl Withheld ML20155F9181998-10-28028 October 1998 Forwards Changes to SPDES Permit,Removing Requirement to Monitor Svc Boiler Blowdown for Phosphates,Eliminate Redundant Sampling of Oil or Grease Entering Flow Tributary to Floor Drains,Per Ts,App B,Section 3.2 ML20155D2791998-10-23023 October 1998 Forwards Corrected Pages for Indian Point Annual Radiological Environ Operating Rept for 1997 ML20155H3021998-09-24024 September 1998 Urges NRC to Revoke Operating Licenses for Indian Point Nuclear Generating Station,Units 2 & 3 & Not Renew OL for Unit 1 ML20154A1391998-09-22022 September 1998 Informs That Effective 980724,AA Blind Assumed Position of Vice President,Nuclear Power & Ja Baumstark Assumed Position of Vice President,Nuclear Power Engineering,Effective 980813 ML20153F0661998-09-18018 September 1998 Provides Response to Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-286/98-05 & Proposed Imposition of Civil Penalty Dtd 980819.Corrective Actions:Existing Drawings for Spare Switchgear Cubicles Have Been Revised ML20237B1001998-08-0505 August 1998 Responds to NRC Re Violations Noted in Insp Repts 50-247/97-13,50-247/97-15,50-247/98-02 & Investigation Rept 1-97-038,respectively.Corrective Actions:Acted Promptly to Assure Conforming to Testing Requirements ML20236X8511998-07-31031 July 1998 Forwards Rept Re Projection of Ability to Pay Retrospective Premium Adjustment for Period 980801-990731,per 10CFR140.21 ML20236Q1431998-07-0808 July 1998 Responds to Administrative Ltr 98-03 Re Operating Reactor Licensing Action Estimates ML20238F5231998-06-29029 June 1998 FOIA Request for Documents Re NRC Office of Investigation Rept 1-97-038,meeting Minutes of Summary of Enforcement Conference on 980506 & Meeting Minutes or Summary of 980520 Predecisional Enforcement Conference ML20154Q1831998-06-29029 June 1998 FOIA Request for Documents Re NRC OI Rept 1-97-038,meeting Minutes of Summary of Enforcement Conference on 980506 & Meeting Minutes or Summary of 980520 Predecisional Enforcement Conference ML20248L9861998-05-21021 May 1998 Forwards Rev 7 to Security Force Training & Qualification Plan.Review to Verify Receipt of Revised Plan & Sign & Return Receipt Ack Form Provided ML20217F8501998-03-20020 March 1998 Forwards Table Which Outlines Nuclear Property Insurance That Has Been Placed on Behalf of Util,Per 10CFR50.54(w)(3) ML20199L9531998-01-26026 January 1998 Forwards Addl Info on Rev 6 to Security Force Training & Qualification Plan,Per 980113 Telcon Request of G Smith.Encl Withheld ML20199F7541998-01-21021 January 1998 Forwards Rev 17 to Physical Security Plan,Per Requirements of 10CFR50.54(p).Rev 17 Contains Summary of Changes, Detailing Changes Incorporated.Encl Withheld ML20198N1151998-01-20020 January 1998 Submits Status of Response to NRC Request for Addl Info, for Licenses TR-3 & R-93.Request for Commitment to Complete Decommissioning Activities by 2007 Has Been Persued Up Through Nasa Mgt ML20202F8281997-11-26026 November 1997 Reports Mod to Indian Point SPDES Permit as Required in Ts. Copy of New York State Dept of Environ Conservation Ltr That Modifies Permit Is Encl ML20198P7901997-10-31031 October 1997 Forwards Rev 6 to Physical Security Plan,Per 10CFR50.4(b)(4) to Meet Requirements of 10CFR50.54(p).Rev 16 Contains Summary of Changes, Detailing Changes Incorporated. Encl Withheld ML20198P3181997-10-30030 October 1997 Forwards Corrected Pages to Annual Radiological Environ Operating Rept for 1996 ML20211H7771997-10-0202 October 1997 Forwards Responses to RAIs 650.1 Through 650.8 Re Generic Issues & Generic Communications on Valve Testing & Valve Qualification.Westinghouse Status for Subject Issues Will Be Confirm W Pending Rev to Ssar & WCAP-13559 ML20211B4241997-09-19019 September 1997 Requests Withdrawal of Revs 16 & 18 to Physical Security Plan.Rev 16 re-submitted Per Provisions of 10CFR50.54(p)(2) & Deals W/Specific Operational Criteria of New Sys.Plan Withheld ML20211A9411997-09-18018 September 1997 Responds to NRC Re Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-286/97-80.Corrective Actions:Revised Administrative Procedure AP-3 to Establish Responsibility for Engineering Review & Revised EOP ES-1.3 ML20149J2491997-07-16016 July 1997 Forwards Environ Ts/Nonroutine Event Rept for Units 1 & 2. Appropriate Ny State Agency Notified ML20148S5731997-06-26026 June 1997 Forwards Response to NRC Re Violations Noted in Insp Repts 50-247/96-80;96-07;96-08;97-03 & Imposition of Civil Penalties on 961027-970405.Corrective Actions:Unique Tag Numbers for Louvers Were Generated ML20148J1431997-06-0404 June 1997 Forwards Rev 15A to Ipn Units 1 & 2 Physical Security Plan, Per 10CFR50.54(p)(2).Plan Withheld ML20137M8371997-04-0101 April 1997 Provides Supplemental Response to RAI Re TS Change Request 96-01 on Conversion to Framatome Cogema Fuel.Tech Specs, Encl ML20137A8301997-03-13013 March 1997 Forwards Response to NRC Ltr Re Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-286/96-80 on 961213.Corrective Actions:Expert Panel Has Agreed to Include Turbine Bldg & Power Conversion Equipment Bldg in Scope of IP3 Maint Rule Program JPN-97-008, Forwards Comments on Draft NUREG-1560, IPE Program: Persprctives on Reactor Safety & Plant Performance1997-03-0404 March 1997 Forwards Comments on Draft NUREG-1560, IPE Program: Persprctives on Reactor Safety & Plant Performance ML1004713451997-02-26026 February 1997 Forwards Proprietary & non-proprietary Versions of W Rept Entitled, Conditional Extension of Rod Misalignment TS for Indian Point 3. Authorization Ltr & Affidavit,Encl. Proprietary Encl Withheld Per 10CFR2.790 ML20135C7121997-02-21021 February 1997 Forwards Table That Outlines Nuclear Property Insurance on Behalf of Util Covering Units 1 & 2 ML1004713471997-02-18018 February 1997 Authorizes Utilization of Encl Affidavit by Util Re WCAP-14669,Rev 1, Conditional Extension of Rod Misalignment TS for Indian Point 3. Rept Should Be Withheld Per 10CFR2.790(b)(4) ML20134N6481996-12-24024 December 1996 Provides Further Details Re Corporate Reorganization of Consolidated Edison Co of Ny for Indian Point Units 1 & 2 ML20132C8071996-12-12012 December 1996 Forwards Check for $100 for Payment of NRC Invoice 7I0053 for Indemnity Fee on License DPR-5 for One Year Period 961204-971203.W/o Check ML20129D9611996-10-11011 October 1996 Forwards Controlled Copy of Plant Physical Security Plan,Rev 18,re Access Control Upgrade Which Adopts Biometric Hand Geometry.W/O Encl ML20117P6151996-09-11011 September 1996 Forwards Rev 9 to Security Training & Qualification Plan.W/O Encl ML20117E3891996-08-21021 August 1996 Forwards Four Copies of IP3 Security Contingency Plan,Rev 4. W/O Encl JPN-96-035, Informs NRC That Boraflex Not Used as Neutron Absorber in Either Util or Plant Spent Fuel Pool Storage Racks,Per GL 96-041996-08-0606 August 1996 Informs NRC That Boraflex Not Used as Neutron Absorber in Either Util or Plant Spent Fuel Pool Storage Racks,Per GL 96-04 1999-09-17
[Table view] Category:PUBLIC ENTITY/CITIZEN/ORGANIZATION/MEDIA TO NRC
MONTHYEARML20238B2771987-08-20020 August 1987 FOIA Request for Available Declassified Info Re Plant Ufo Sightings on 840614 & 0724 ML20206F3441986-06-0606 June 1986 FOIA Request for All Repts,Logs,Statements,Documents & Photographic Matl Re Ufo Seen Hovering Over Plant by Police Officers on 840724 & Repts of Other Ufo Incidents Near Plant from Jan 1983 - May 1986 ML20151Y7011986-01-30030 January 1986 Requests 3-month Extension of Deadline for Public Response Re Util Amend Requests for Facilities to Permit Safe Storage Status of Unit 1 Until Unit 2 OL Expires & to Extend OL for Unit 2 Until 2013 ML20154A7391985-12-23023 December 1985 FOIA Request for Documents Re Unusual Events,Possible Security Threats & Violations of Airspace of Site on or About 840724.Press Releases Encl ML20198M9631985-06-17017 June 1985 Forwards Allegations of Safety Violations of Nuclear Regulatory Law or Westinghouse QA Requirements.Investigation Requested.Related Info Encl ML20133M2751985-05-24024 May 1985 FOIA Request for Info Re Requests by NRC or Other Agency to Have Green Beret Personnel or Any Military or Nonmilitary Personnel Penetrate & or Evaluate Physical Protection Plans of Facilities ML20134D5881985-05-0808 May 1985 FOIA Request for Documents Re NRC Proposed Decommissioning Rule & Implementation of Rule to Decommissioned Reactors ML20106B1001984-09-19019 September 1984 Requests Independent Insp & Appraisal of Methods Used & Assumptions Made About Condition Re Flaw or Crack in Weld of Pressure Vessel.Related Info Encl ML20092J7281984-06-25025 June 1984 Expresses Opposition to Util 840409 Request for Exemption from Regulation Requiring Annual full-scale Emergency Preparedness Exercise.Objections Listed ML20091R9121984-06-14014 June 1984 Requests Staff Rept Re Licensee Request for Exemption from Annual full-scale Emergency Exercise Requirement.Commission Should Note No Assurance or Commitment Made That Participants Will Be Prepared for Nov Exercise ML20091E4091984-05-31031 May 1984 Expresses Position That Util Should Not Be Granted Extension of Time to Conduct full-scale Emergency Preparedness Exercise Until at Least 841130.Request Does Not Meet Public Interest Std of 10CFR50.12(a) ML20080D3001984-02-0606 February 1984 Responds to ASLB Recommendations Re Emergency Planning for Facility & County.Facility Should Be Closed Due to Inadequacy of Emergency Measures in Event of Major Radiation Release ML20086L3151984-02-0303 February 1984 Charges Commission W/Failure to Fulfill Responsibility of Assuring Public Safety in Event of Emergency Evacuation. Shelters Useless,Disabled,Forgotten & Plan Sadly Deficient ML20086S5941983-10-20020 October 1983 FOIA Request for SECY-78-569,UCID-19310, Review of PASNY Sys Interaction Study & Records of NRC Staff & Consultant Review of PASNY Sys Interaction Study on Indian Point Unit 3 ML20076E1431983-08-14014 August 1983 Discusses Problems W/Recent Evacuation Training & Emergency Plan Workability ML20076J0941983-06-10010 June 1983 Responds to P Amico Rept Re Recommendations for Addl Testimony on Pra.Reopening Record on PRA Would Unduly Prolong Proceeding ML20071P8831983-06-0606 June 1983 Comments on Governors Plan Prepared by Ny State Disaster Commission.Evacuation of Wheelchair & Bedridden Patients & Shelter for 1,200 Mentally Retarded Patients Overlooked ML20071P3241983-06-0303 June 1983 Expresses Views on Plant Emergency Preparedness in Light of Newly Submitted State of Ny Interim Plan.Conceptual Problems & Inaccuracies Identified in Plan for Implementing Compensating Measures for Rockland County ML20071P8641983-06-0202 June 1983 Opposes Facility Shutdown ML20077J5621983-05-26026 May 1983 FOIA Request for Preliminary Safety Analyses of Indian Point & Shoreham Plants ML20076F2131983-05-24024 May 1983 Requests Extension of 830609 Deadline for Planners to Provide Adequate Emergency Evacuation.Util Acting in Good Faith in Expressing Concern for Quality of Life of Community Residents ML20071G9731983-05-23023 May 1983 Supports Continued Plant Operations.Plants Should Not Be Held Hostage to Evacuation Process ML20071L5121983-05-20020 May 1983 Package of Two Citizens Ltrs Supporting Continued Facility Operation ML20076F2041983-05-20020 May 1983 Supports Continued Operation of Facility.Impact of Shutdown Would Be Devastating ML20071L4891983-05-19019 May 1983 Supports Shutdown of Facilities on 830609 ML20071H1791983-05-19019 May 1983 Supports Closing Down of Facility ML20071H1271983-05-16016 May 1983 Supports Continued Facility Operation ML20023D5591983-05-16016 May 1983 Requests Time to Speak on 830526.State of Ny Claims Unsubstantiated.Nrc Should Adopt Policy of Communicating W/Public ML20071G9241983-05-16016 May 1983 Opines That Decision Re Continued Plant Operation Must Weigh Health Effects of Replacement by Coal Burning Plants ML20076D0071983-05-15015 May 1983 Advises That Day of Reckoning Re Evacuation Plan Issue Coming on 830609.Interim Compensating Actions by FEMA Cannot Compensate for Unchangeable Factors of Problem Roads & Population Density ML20074A7361983-05-10010 May 1983 Forwards I Levi Affidavit Clarifying 830211 Testimony on Suggested Method of Making Sensible Probability Judgments Described in Section 5 ML20023B4211983-05-0202 May 1983 Proposes Alternative Views to Questions Posed in Sj Chilk 830426 Ltr to FEMA Re Emergency Planning & Evacuation ML20073G5391983-04-11011 April 1983 Forwards Intervenor Testimony on 830309 Radiological Emergency Response Plan Exercise ML20069D5091983-03-14014 March 1983 Requests ASLB Direct Pj Amico,Independent Consultant to Aslb,To File Complete Resume.Amico Raises Questions of Independence Which Must Be Resolved ML20071E4551983-03-0707 March 1983 Opposes Schedule for Hearing Evacuation Planning Testimony of Six Intervenors in 5 Days ML20083Q3821983-02-21021 February 1983 Urges Reconsideration of Decision Not to Hold Any Limited Appearance Hearings in Ny City During Wk of 830301-01.People Should Be Heard ML20065B8881983-02-18018 February 1983 Provides List of Intended Witnesses for 830301 Hearing ML20077K4531983-01-0606 January 1983 Forwards Ny Pirg 821207 Critical Analysis of Training Program Presented to Rockland County Health Dept on 821123 by State of Ny,Ofc of Disaster Preparedness ML20028C7701982-12-28028 December 1982 Requests Conference Call to Resolve Time Limit Dispute Re Depositions Prior to Delivery of Thompson & Sholly Testimony ML20070K4761982-12-27027 December 1982 Ack Receipt of Summary of Steam Generator Owners Group 820729 Meeting.Request Being Filed for Delay in Delivering Testimony on Question 2.2.1 in Order to Obtain Previously Inaccessible Info ML20070H3311982-12-16016 December 1982 Forwards Inadvertently Sent to J Hendrie. Attendance at 830110 Evidentiary Hearing Requested ML20070H3381982-12-13013 December 1982 Ack Receipt of 821210 Invitation to Attend Evidentiary Hearing in White Plains,Ny.Attendance Certain Unless Accident Postpones Hearing ML20028A5121982-11-18018 November 1982 Advises That Ny County Democratic Committee Passed Encl Resolution on 821118 Favoring Permanent Closing of Plants ML20028A4711982-11-15015 November 1982 Forwards Review of Radiological Emergency Preparedness Plans for Facilities,To Give Commission Accurate & Thorough Understanding of State of Emergency Preparedness in Communities Around Plant ML20027D5161982-10-29029 October 1982 Updates Rockland County Info Re Sirens,Emergency Equipment, Population Estimates,Finances & Procedures.Info Should Have Been Forwarded to NRC by Fema.County Resolution 320 Encl ML20065M7291982-10-18018 October 1982 Requests Destruction of West Branch Conservation Assoc 821011 Reply to 821001 Memorandum & Order & Substitution of Encl Version ML20023A7871982-10-15015 October 1982 Advises That Serious Deficiencies in Emergency Preparedness Will Not Be Corrected Since State of Ny & FEMA Not Addressing Concerns of Local Officials by Involvement in Current Changes ML20071M5171982-09-24024 September 1982 Forwards Petition w/17,000 Signatures Calling for Immediate Plant Shutdown.W/O Entire Petition ML20027B5771982-09-20020 September 1982 Package of Two Ltrs Requesting That Issue of Evacuating Population within 10 Miles of Facility Be Considered in Decision ML20069D6151982-09-20020 September 1982 Package of Three Ltrs Demanding Closing of Plant Due to Unsafe Conditions & Potential Hazards 1987-08-20
[Table view] |
Text
,, fI- g2M
WEST BRANCH CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION -
43 BUENA VISTA ROAD NEW CITY N Y 10956 Masl36Ph 9s3 F2 20 Commissioner Nunzio Palladine, Chairman Commissioner Victor Gilinsky Commissioner John F. Ahearne Commissioner Thomas M. Roberts Commissioner James K. Asselstine
Dear Commissioner:
We submit the attached paper for the May 20 date and hope you would allow some of us a few minutes on May 26.
I am a member of the Rockland County Citizens Advisory Committee For A New Evacuation Plan and also participated in the ASLB hearings with as good an attendance record as any.
We did not participate in those hearings without a great deal of personal devotion and organization funds. It is a serious commitment.
We are troubled that you will not have any adversarial testimony before you. The New York State people are making claims and promises that we believe to be bloated. We were unable to bring to the hearings two important witnesses because they have State jobs. One is the administrator of ,
Letchworth Village and the other is the administrator of Helen Hayes Hospital. These two institutions do not have the
- preparation claimed for them and you should have an oppor-
'tunity to be told how many witnesses were unable to, or un-willing to travel,to White Plains from Rockland County and where the holes remain in the record.
We would hope that by now the NRC would adopt a policy of communicating with the public.
Sincerely yours, Z S. Fleisher Secretary 8305200605 830516 PDR ADOCK 05000247 0 PDR g
NRC PUTS LICENSEE'S RESPONSIBILITY ONTO THE LOCAL PEOPLE The licensees! Emergency Response Plan was rejected by the personnel in Rockland County who were responsible for its implementation. The NRC is now saying that Rockland must come up with a plan before Rockland is ready, by June 9.
It took the licensees years to develop a poor plan.
Now, instead of shutting down the plants for the safety of the people, #3 having been down for 14 months, the NRC is pressing Rockla,nd to be ready by June 9 It is the licensees who have not provided equipment and training and who substan-tiallydidnothjnguntilthegunwasplacedattheirheads.
Rockland's Citizens Advisory Committee has been meet-ing regularly. The departments that would be involved in any plan have surveyed their needs. We can't make a plan over-night, nor will we offer one that isn't implementable, like that offered to us in 1981. The pressure being put on Rock-
~: 'kandwithoffersofNationalGuardorWestPointcadetassis-tance are bending the evacuation regulations of the NRC.
- Now that the regulations can't be met in May, 1983, we are hearing that as long as there is planning it shows good intentions and that is reason to permit the plants to be open (or rather one to reopen.) There is an old addage about
- the roa'd to Hell being paved with good intentions and the very point is that right now there is no plan.
Two 120 day periods have come and gone while the NRC
- 1-r- ~-, g -
is doing nothing to protect the safety of the people surrounding Indian Point. The NRC is derelict.
In referring to risk analysis the licensees are sending up a smoke screen. The regulations of the NRC under 10 CFR 50:47 state that there shall be an-implementable evacuation plan. There isn't one by the NRC's own standards and in an area where today no such station would be built due to the density of the surrounding population.
By comparison Rockland has more of its population within the 10 mile EPZ than the other three counties. It is 2/5ths of the total in Rockland whereas no other has more -
than 1/7th. [
ROCKLAND COUNTY IS UNIQUE The EPZ in Rockland County is geographically about one half the County. Some boundaries of Rockland are no more than 15 miles from Indian Point whereas Westchester's
' extends to 25 miles and Orange to 45 miles. Rockland has
.i .f fewer resources Uoutside its EPZ in proportion to the need for as,sitance than any of the other counties, and perhaps than of any county in the United States. The resources in Westchester outside the EPZ are far larger in proportion and are far better supplied with County owned trasportation, emergency personnel and equipment.
By choice Rockland County does not have a County Executive. The head of the government is the Chairman of the County fegislature, with most power vested in the full
. - _ _ - _ _ - - .. - - _a.
body, not in the Chairman. He, and the legislators are all part-time officials. Changes to provide a County Executive have been voted down by the citizens some nine times. A county-vide police force has been rejected by the voters. There is no county department of public works. There are very few buses owned by the county. Neither the County nor the local hospitals own ambulances. By comparison with Westchester it can be said Rockland has far less resources to provide trans-portation and road maintenance to an endangered EPZ in a time of crisis.
All the firemen in Rockland are volunteers and are not available during their working hours if they work outside the county. Rockland has a large group of New York City fire-men and polico living in it. The same is true of the ambulance corps with the exception of a few commercial ambulance vehicles.
Above are some of the reasons why Rockland has more
} fifficulty preparing an implementable evacuation plan. Addi-tionally, Rockla,nd's geography makes it almost the same as an island, with the Hudson on the east and mountains surrounding it on the other compass points.
SCHOOL GO-HOME-EARLY PLAN IS AN EVASION OF RESPONSIBILITY There is no saying there will be timo to notify pa-rents or their surrogates in the event of a nuclear accident.
There's no saying there will be enough telephone lines on which .
to notify parents as many schools have only two or three out-side lines.
__ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ __-_m-- -
Supposedly responsible officials such as Mr. Donald Davido'ff the the New York State Radiological Emergency Response Group have compared snow day cancellations of school to one of a radiological emergency. The scale is not the same as a broken boiler or a snow storm, nor is the need as pressing for quick action.
The New York State compensating plan for Rockland County had zero plan for school children, at the time of the March 9 drill. In fact, a school in Rockland that had been closed for two years was reported to have been evacuated by noon ! The State's plan is a patchwork of nothing. It is playing roulette with peoples' lives.
The Go-Rome-Early suggestion is an evasion of respon-sibility; a subterfuge in order to get around a problem that so far has no good solution.
THERE ARE NO SATISFACTORY PLANS TO MOVE THE DISABLED
, Rockland County has a large population of institu-
'kionalized persons needing special care. As an example, the Helen Hayes Hospital For Rehabilitation, which has a fine record *for helping the handicapped to become useful, has no more plans than that of a regular fire drill. There are no shelters sufficient to care for the number of stretcher and wheelchair patients.
- . "Lthe c worth Village with some 1,300 patients would have to depend on buses coming from afar and has no base-ment shelters dry enough, or ventilated enough to use.
_ 4_
e , , - -.
.c , _ .m ..
8 SECTION 504 IS VIOLATED BY THE LICENSEES' PLAN Equal protection is not available to the handicapped in Helen Hayes Hospital, Letchworth Village, Camp Jawonio and several schools within Rockland's EPZ. The plan offered in 1981 practised triage by failing to care for the handicapped.
Rockland's Health Complex houses many invalids who need special care. There.are nursing homes with no facilities to unload all their patients at once.
SHELTERING IS NOT A FEASIBLE CHOICE The lic,ensees (Coned and PASNY) answered an NRC Staff interrogatory in the ASLB hearings just held stating "The shelteringshie}dingfactorsarebasedupontheassumptionthat persons with access to basements (90 percent of the popula-tion) would take shelter in them." Laws have been passed by Towns in Rockland requiring homes to be built 3 feet above the water table resulting in " raised ranches" which are built on slabs and which have no basements. No surveys were made
' ~
[ "byeitherNewYorkState, the licensees or FEMA to show that r,
there were basements in Rockland County for sheltering. Yet the alternative to evacuation by sheltering is offered.
Many of the schools are new and built with glass walls including the corridors. They offer no shelters.
FALSE COMPARISONS OF ROCKLAND PERSONNEL
"' In the questions attached to Mr. Chilk's letter to Richard Krimm of FEMA of April 26 several comparisons are -
.g _ q . . . . -__ , _ , , . , _,___n , _ , _ , -
,n._,
are made to events that are not comparable.
The recent fire in Mt. Ivy during the evening in no way compares to a nuclear emergency. Only 100 persons in a downwind trailer park were told to move. They caused no traffic congestion going a mere two miles to two local fire houses for a few hours. No sirens were used, no congestion on the phone lines. The night time hour assured that many volunteers were available and that most families were together that moved. An event involving 1/1,000th of the possible EPZ population hardly compares and should not be offered. It reduces the credibility of the NR0 because the local citiz(ns understand how different it is from a large more threatening emergency.
A chlorine barge that someway was damaged as it moved on the Hudson River would be swapped by all of us for a radiological emergency, gladly.
^
NRC AND FEMA ATTEMPT TO PUT THE BURDEN ON ROCKLAND CITIZENS 1 [
~
The tone of the FEMA and NRC communications tend to place some blame on the Rockland citizens involved in making a new plan. There are no shortcomings in the Rockland people.
The volunteers may be equalled but not surpassed. The people of Rockland gladly place their safety in the hands of the ,
firemen, police and ambulance corps of Rockland County.
Any shortcomings are due to the. lack of a useful plan concoted by the licensees who are the ones that
wasted years dragging their feet and offered a poor quality plan. It is not stubborn anti-nukes, as Commissioner Dyson suggested, that have held back development of a plan. It is the attempt of the licensees and the rest of the " establish-ment" such as FEMA and the NRC that have tried to force on Rockland County an unworkable plan threatening the safety of all citizens. The persons who would have to effect the useless plan objected to it. The NRC errs and loses credibility by implying that Rockland personnel are anything but the best. ,
The Chiefs of Police in Rockland County's EPZ have testified that they have insufficient personnel to attend the intersections ndeding traffic control. If they even have barriers, there are no trucks to cart them to intersections in a mass effort.
It is not Rockland who offered a brochure which failed
. to invite sufficient response from the impaired by the paltry
?
~7 number of cards returned. It is.not Rockland personnel who failed to post public notices, who didn't account for the possibility of thousands of persons in the parks with no remaining buses to move them out.
The failures of the licensees' plan are too numer-ous to list here.
- FEMA'FKTLED TO IDENTI?Y DEFICIENCIES REVEALED TO THEM Repeatedly Rockland has pointed to deficiencies which '
FEMA has omitted. The most important deficiency is the-road 7-e
.,--y- -, v+ - , _ _y, , . _ - .
- p. ,gy_.__ ,- ,-_,.-_.-ven -
.-.r.,,. , , .-,. ..., , , , , - ,
networ,k. The location and small number of tow trucks to be ready to remove road blocks, the failure of the brochure to effect its purpose in several ways; the lack of shelters, the lack of training, the turn-over problem in preparing elected officials for emergency response, and many more.
The combined establishment personnel turned out a new brochure, and FEMA has not objected, which, on page 20, sug-gested that the licensees' nuclear station saved the use of 20 million barrels of oil when in truth last year, with IP #3 down fourteen months, only 10 million could have been saved, if indeed, that figure is correct. Sined the brochure f
is supposed to 6e printed annually, one would expect the s
" Facts about Indian Point" to be just that. What it is in-stead is advertising for the licensees and is no part of an evacuation brochure which FEMA should'so note.
A glaring deficiency is in communications. The tele-
- 7 . phone system is not capable.of handling the pressure that
~ ~
would be applied.. Other radio contact in many levels is completely missing. Radio contact in Rockland is primitive and would hinder an evacuation during a nuclear emergency.
THE NRC IS NOT ENFORCING ITS OWN RULES AND REGULATIONS The most glaring fault, far exceeding the lack on the part of any other entity, is that of the NRC's failure
' t'o come to grips with the present issue. Equating the density of the population with superesafety supposedly existing at Indian Point is the most incredible fantasy l
l .
of many being passed around.
There is no plan in Rockland right now. There have been several delays offered and they have not produced a plan of this'date. The rules and regulations intent is to protect the safety of the people in the 10 mile EPZ. The deviations and legal obfuscations are maneuvers to avoid taking the bull by the horns which is what the NRC appears to fail to do.
The fact that Rockland County is investigating the feasibility of making an evacuation plan does not mean it has one. All the S_ tate's compensatory plans do not fulfill NUREG 0654 nor 10 CFR 50:47 and Appendix E. Rockland might go en trying to make g plan for months or years. What is there about the present thaU allows the rules and regs to be bent?
Indian Point #3 has been down for fourteen months and no dire effects have been felt that anyone has heard. Coned has ample capacity to permit #2 to be up and ,down during this
, time without brown-outs or calls for less consumption. The a
~7 economic consequences may be debatable but surely we cre not expecting the NRC to protect some investors as against the lives df 280,000 persons living within 10 miles of the station.
It is the fault of the licensees that a no good plan was pro-vided at great cost to their rate payers. They should bear the onus, not the people of Rockland.
- ~'It is TMI, Salem 1 and unresolved A-17 issues that suggest a more responsible response on the part of the NRC.
The people of Rockland will be' happy when such signs appear.
Dialogue with responsible citizens on the CAC and interve-nors in.the ASLB case and the NRC Commissioners is needed.
_9_
l . - c.
Bj.$ ,. . ,-.
~
k;.
s, E .--. --.,. g i.S z M "M' y .c.7, y ,s'.y,y%,9 j.M i
T .y man f5 E g
h s:
m,ggwarm ggg g g @g dg g ,
s : <
p z' u
_.Y R . C
~
=
m /w p- ,a ,,,{ -
F0yR,fSECTIONS,52 PAGES:
- ,1 @ g- -
y
",e
..s..,
L1 -
a;;e-i-[1
, ,+.
. l.
T .r ' .' ;-
'ai S'
~
W Rs,\-l3drk..q Disaster
@ W.. k- u. cIrill was disaster dp 9.3.
. r..
e 1:
ca-v -
- f. ~ r . I. .,
By CHAPIN WRIGHT see we Last Oct.13, the Salem nuclear generating statioi
. ?.,
?;.,
y.
Y j
$ ff;
- g. . pr.s
~ceb. .;* -in. Lower Alloways Creek was the scene of a full-2.g M N - scale, simulated disaster -
7.; < ; E MM.;- -
A mock " general emergency" was declared -
,$ C E the most serious of the four " emergency action
.n -
> levels" that can result from an accident at a x.
3, c
I'
.- nuclear power plant.
But according to a soon-tobe re-D ? leased " Post Exercise Assessment" by w
b the Federal Emergency Management
(
) N,$
g- -
Agency (FEMM, that emergency exer.
cise was far from perfect. "'/ . -
" .. + g A real general emergency would w
, ?.% - - have meant the evacuation of many of 6_, E the 16,000 New Jersey residents who e" live within 10 miles of the Salem f
o facility - which recently got the go-g ahead from the NRC to restart its .
number one reactor after two circult- N 79 . g gs; g
breaker malfunctions in late February forced the unit to be shut down.
Hundreds of state, county and local t.owEn AttowAYS CREEK 8' ~f -
emergency personnel took part in the on .ue l
f"'~-
a daylong drill which was designed to *y"
' test a disaster response plan kno vn as e '
j -. the " Artificial Island Plan." .
- Star indicates Solem plant. -
C UNDER THE WATCHFUL gue of several observers from FEMA, various Among the major problems cited in
,.ggg g;4g emergency teams acted out communi.
. -f the hignly entical report are:
e inadequate placement of radiation i
~ ~
rie of d on tr t o s n a field monitoring equipment.
i - .,- s - - County and neighboring Cumberland e Inadequate training of Salem l . Y..ymmeI# County. . County emergency personnel in the.
'~ The FEMA report details a number l T' .
use of dossimeters to determine con-of'"significant deficiencies" in the uu'
' ' ' 'demonstration,.
tam d ,.
including lack of ade- rn ove the size and opera-quate personnel, under tramed per- tion of the Salem County Emergency onnel, and a general sense of hianagement Office.
e Failure to demonstrate the opera -
~# -
4 "There are still some problems at tion of Congregate Care Centers- the Z this point" said Roger Garelik, com- first stop in the event of a full h 5
[ munity planner tor FEMNs region Il (Continued on Page A8, Col.1)
CW.24 W -- Ez2 0 . office in New York.
M 5
Salein's nuclear emergency plan failec . during which "significant deficien-5 % From A1 l
.acuation, t the e tion logistics in the f d -
o Prohlims' with the layout of the
- two cases do,n't compare - 288,000 ge . ;.
2 yB; People live within a 10$ mile radius of e .
contamination center. the lodian Point pirnt, whileithe y %
j o . 12r;
- h.,;.q pf o Failurs t3 demon. strate evacuation region surrounding the Salem plant'is s y p". $g "
Si i ro e e 15 0 bs rved m and in an nt te very !.
Cumberland County and in the city v --- - .different types of animals," said.' "kIN"i#-
^
p*- M' ,+- -
~
h3 Sal:m,-
g'b'p
. FEh's Gard ' ' *- .
-Overall response wasn't fully dem- -
- 3. % .n .
$+(, &'. *^
r-istrated," Garelik said. "It caused us . When FEMA completes its analysis me problems." .; -
- 1. 'of the Salem emergency plan it will be ~ ,, s 7 - .
r.
- h.7 t.
^ g .., -
~
w jk
.-
- submitted to the NRC, which will IIE SAID THAT the intent of the evaluate it and the drill report.
17g
,.gs
$ d? ppR ~
5
, @h ~w.
port is to get. state and county .. .. > t. :.. . . . ~
': H 't M
- tuorities t3 take corrective actions. .. ."BOTH HAVE TO be acceptable" . . 4. . .i .4 ef
)w will they do that will be judged Garelik said. "It's up to the NRC as to
.[ 7b %
My 1
h g
is falliswhen ercise scheduled. another emergency what course A The discretion of action is theirs" - . ; ;, to3,,'
take,if any. . l. .. 6 3, g y). p. - -
~p. tge.(hh".1('f(T hk W 'rr.rM $
~
Some stat 2 officials, however, have State'e" merge'nc' y " officials, wh15e s. C un issua with some of the criticistps. . somewhat critical of the FEMA report) nled by FEMA in the report. L. pre confident.that they can make the E '
4' 4'*/ 'S yM 'n#v hhn Tatum. acting chief .of the proper adjustments in time for this 'il "Y' 'DE'%. ' ..'i V WW '
'I ~
~~ <
nratiInal Planning Bureau of the year's test. , .
tw Jus 2y Office of Emergency s Si- - "
anagem;nt, called the state's emer- ' "'lliere's no question that every drill ,~ t .-
, , .--e ncy plan for nuclear accidents "one ~ is to make operations better," said Jon 4 Mdh, W ~E g. 'tfrH tha most detailed types of protec. Christiansen, pfincipal planner in the n plans I've ever seen."
ky %fYD
. Py, y [;
M $ *
' k@g.(y
Radiation Emergency Response Team. 2J' i W'4M
'The state has demonstrated that it "Some things Seed improvement at - - *'
- a protect the public against disas. Salem. , , ;
." ha said. "I don't think we agree Whatever is la that report,I will sit A Salem nuclear plant employee poses with one of, tF th, FEMA on the major deficien- down with other people and say "How faulty circuit breakers at the plant lost month.
The " Artificial Island Plan".- so -
med because the Salem nuclear Christiansen was quick to point out ,
int sits en a man-made island in the that despite FEMA's concerns,"I don't tt.ere were problems with the exer- ONE AREA THAT needs atten lawara River - was developed by think theofpublic was inproblems jeopardy.,th -g;3,, is the attitude of the various to te, ccunty and local authorities One the biggest wi teers who take part;in the dr
-ty in 1980. last October's exercise, Christiansen "There may have been confusion'" Christiansensaid, adding that"it w the; St.:le Office of Emergency said, was that it was held during the lot of circumstances that piled he said.
nagement,which is part of the New day when many volunteers were sey Division of State Police,is the unable to participate. The point is, now to correct the w tich led to the failure of var ergency personnel to a ar d agincy in such matters and acts He said that; FEMA failed to take deficiencies as soon as possible, parti emThe upshot of the last Sa m ccnjuncti:n with er6ergency man. that factor into account in its report. culary in light of the Indian Point that there needs to be greater par l rmint offices in Salem and Cumber , The federal agency is now considering decision, he said.
patian by local respondents and I.
- .d Ccunties. . whether to conduct this year's d, rill "The NRC is heralding to us that elected officials," he said. "We nee during the evening hours. they consider off-site aspects as impor impress upon people that they nee
- N THE WAKE cf the 1979 acci-nt at Three Mile Island, the Nuclear tant as onsite aspects" he said. *The improve their skills.
gulatory Commission and FEMA "TO,, CRITICIZE local ~P' ple is state should be concerned but not "It's OK to make a mistake in a d a, as hg as ymn conut it after" irred changes in all emergency ay t y' d nt respond a e' dismayed."
ponse plans to achieve a more .
quate nd rdized approach, Tatum ex. ggor than 800 emergency workers
~
the Salem plan is still being evaluat- from Salem and Cumberland Counties were scheduled t( take part in the t,y FEMA to determine its feasibili-
' and could receive approval in. .. drill, he said.
Tral' months. Christiansen also said that many of
- tate and federal officials do not the 20 or so FEMA observers at the .
- icipata that the Salem emergency drill may not have been totally famil-
, apsedness plan will run into the tar with the local preparedness plan.
l na difficulties that the lndian Point, "We did have some disagreements Y., plan did. with FEMA in the way they observed
'arlier this week the NRC threat- the exercise," he said. "It may have ad to shut down the two nuclear been that the FEMA observers were a mer plants on the Hudson River by little uninformed with the procedures le 9 unless there were " compelling down there."
i sons to , keep them in operation." But Christiansen admitted that l
l
.