IR 05000382/2009004
| ML103300029 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Waterford  |
| Issue date: | 11/24/2010 |
| From: | Clark J A NRC/RGN-IV/DRP/RPB-E |
| To: | Kowalewski J A Entergy Operations |
| References | |
| IR-09-004 | |
| Download: ML103300029 (7) | |
Text
November 24, 2010
Joseph Kowalewski, Vice President, Operations Entergy Operations, Inc. Waterford Steam Electric Station, Unit 3 17265 River Road Killona, LA 70057-0751
SUBJECT: WATERFORD STEAM ELECTRIC STATION, UNIT 3 - NRC INTEGRATED INSPECTION REPORT 05000382/2009004 ERRATA
Dear Mr. Kowalewski:
It was found that two inspection activities were not correctly documented in NRC Inspection Report 05000382/2009004, dated November 18, 2009. The inspection activities in question were in Section 4OA1, "Performance Indicator Reviews," specifically, Mitigating Systems Performance Index - Heat Removal System and Residual Heat Removal System. These items were omitted and inadvertently replaced with the documentation for Safety System Functional Failures and Mitigating Systems Performance Index - Emergency ac Power System, which were previously documented in NRC Inspection Report 05000382/2009003, dated August 3, 2009. As a result of this correction, please replace pages 16 through 18 of NRC Inspection Report 05000382/2009004, with the enclosed pages.
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter, and its enclosure, will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records component of NRC's document system (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).
Sincerely,/RA/ By Ray V. Azua Acting for/
Jeffrey A. Clark, P.E
. Chief, Project Branch E Division of Reactor Projects
Entergy Operations, Inc. - 2 -
Docket: 50-382 License: NPF-38
Enclosure:
NRC Inspection Report 05000382/2009004 ERRATA Pages 16 through 18 cc w/
Enclosure:
John T. Herron Senior Vice President Entergy Nuclear Operations P. O. Box 31995 Jackson, MS 39286-1995 Jeff Forbes Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer Entergy Operations, Inc. P. O. Box 31995 Jackson, MS 39286-1995
Thomas Palmisano Vice President, Operations Support Entergy Services, Inc. P. O. Box 31995 Jackson, MS 39286-1995 Senior Manager, Nuclear Safety and Licensing Entergy Services, Inc.
P. O. Box 31995 Jackson, MS 39286-1995 Bob Murillo, Acting Director Nuclear Safety Assurance Entergy Operations, Inc. 17265 River Road Killona, LA 70057-0751 Billy Steelman, Acting Manager Licensing and Regulatory Affairs Entergy Operations, Inc.
17265 River Road Killona, LA 70057-0751
Entergy Operations, Inc. - 3 -
Charles F. Arnone General Manager, Plant Operations Waterford 3 SES Entergy Operations, Inc. 17265 River Road Killona, LA 70057-0751 Joseph A. Aluise Associate General Counsel - Nuclear Entergy Services, Inc. 639 Loyola Avenue New Orleans, LA 70113 Director, Nuclear Safety & Licensing Entergy, Operations, Inc.
440 Hamilton Avenue White Plains, NY 10601 Chairman Louisiana Public Service Commission P. O. Box 91154 Baton Rouge, LA 70821-9154 Parish President Council St. Charles Parish P. O. Box 302 Hahnville, LA 70057 St. Charles Parish Dept. of Emergency Preparedness Emergency Operations Center P.O. Box 302 Hahnville, LA 70057 Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality, Radiological Emergency Planning and Response Division P. O. Box 4312 Baton Rouge, LA 70821-4312 Chief, Technological Hazards Branch FEMA Region VI 800 North Loop 288 Federal Regional Center Denton, TX 76209 Entergy Operations, Inc. - 4 -
Electronic distribution by RIV: Regional Administrator (Elmo.Collins@nrc.gov) Acting Deputy Regional Administrator (Brian.Holian@nrc.gov)
DRP Director (Kriss.Kennedy@nrc.gov) Acting DRP Deputy Director (Troy.Pruett@nrc.gov) Acting DRS Director (Tony.Vegel@nrc.gov) DRS Deputy Director (Vacant) Senior Resident Inspector (Marlone.Davis@nrc.gov)
Resident Inspector (Dean.Overland@nrc.gov) Branch Chief, DRP/E (Jeff.Clark@nrc.gov) Senior Project Engineer, DRP/E (Ray.Azua@nrc.gov) Project Engineer, DRP/E (William.Schaup@nrc.gov) Project Engineer, DRP/E (Jim.Melfi@nrc.gov) Project Engineer, DRP/E (Chris.Smith@nrc.gov) WAT Site Secretary (Linda.Dufrene@nrc.gov )
Project Manager (Kaly.Kalyanam@nrc.gov) Public Affairs Officer (Victor.Dricks@nrc.gov) Public Affairs Officer (Lara.Uselding@nrc.gov) Branch Chief, DRS/TSB (Michael.Hay@nrc.gov) RITS Coordinator (Marisa.Herrera@nrc.gov)
Regional Counsel (Karla.Fuller@nrc.gov) Congressional Affairs Officer (Jenny.Weil@nrc.gov) OEMAIL.Resource@nrc.gov Regional State Liaison Officer (Bill.Maier@nrc.gov) NSIR/DPR/EP (Eric.Schrader@nrc.gov)
ROPreports.Resource@nrc.gov DRS/TSB STA (Dale.Powers@nrc.gov) OEDO RIV Coordinator (Geoffrey.Miller@nrc.gov)
R:\_REACTORS\_WAT\2009\WAT 2009004 ERRATA RPT.docx ML103300029 ADAMS: No Yes SUNSI Review Complete Reviewer Initials: RVA Publicly Available Non-Sensitive Non-publicly Available Sensitive RIV:SRI:DRP/E RI:DRP/E SPE:DRP/E C:DRP/E MFDavis DHOverland RVAzua JAClark /RA - E/ /RA-T-RAzua/ /RA/ /RA-RAzua for/ 11/23/2010 11/24/2010 11/24/2010 11/24/2010 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY T=Telephone E=E-mail F=Fax ERRATA - 16 - * Exposures of individuals from selected work groups
- Records detailing the historical trends and current status of tracked plant source terms and contingency plans for expected changes in the source term due to changes in plant fuel performance issues or changes in plant primary chemistry
- Declared pregnant workers during the current assessment period, monitoring controls, and the exposure results
- Self-assessments, audits, and special reports related to the ALARA program since the last inspection
- Resolution through the corrective action process of problems identified through post-job reviews and post-outage ALARA report critiques The inspector completed 11 of the required 15 samples and 5 of the optional samples as defined in IP 71121.02-05.
4. OTHER ACTIVITIES 4OA1 Performance Indicator Verification (71151) .1 Data Submission Issue a. Inspection Scope The inspectors performed a review of the data submitted by the licensee for the second quarter of 2009 performance indicators for any obvious inconsistencies prior to its public release in accordance with Inspection Manual Chapter 0608, "Performance Indicator Program." This review was performed as part of the inspectors' normal plant status activities and, as such, did not constitute a separate inspection sample. b. Findings No findings of significance were identified. .2 Mitigating Systems Performance Index - Heat Removal System (MS08)
a. Inspection Scope The inspectors sampled licensee submittals for the mitigating systems performance index - heat removal system performance indicator for the period from the second quarter of 2008 through the second quarter of 2009. To determine the accuracy of the performance indicator data reported during those periods, the inspectors used definitions and guidance contained in NEI Document 99-02, "Regulatory Assessment Performance Indicator Guideline," Revision 5, and NUREG-1022, "Event Reporting Guidelines 10CFR 50.72 and 50.73," definitions and guidance were used. The inspectors reviewed the licensee's operator narrative logs, issue reports, event reports, mitigating systems performance index derivation reports, and NRC integrated inspection reports for the ERRATA - 17 - period beginning the second quarter of 2008 through the second quarter of 2009 to validate the accuracy of the submittals. The inspectors reviewed the mitigating systems performance index component risk coefficient to determine if it had changed by more than 25 percent in value since the previous inspection, and if so, that the change was in accordance with applicable NEI guidance. The inspectors also reviewed the licensee's issue report database to determine if any problems had been identified with the performance indicator data collected or transmitted for this indicator and none were identified. Specific documents reviewed are described in the attachment to this report.
These activities constitute completion of one (1) mitigating systems performance index heat removal system sample as defined in Inspection Procedure 71151-05. b. Findings No findings of significance were identified. .3 Mitigating Systems Performance Index - Residual Heat Removal System (MS09)
a. Inspection Scope The inspectors sampled licensee submittals for the mitigating systems performance index - residual heat removal system performance indicator for the period from the second quarter of 2008 through the second quarter of 2009. To determine the accuracy of the performance indicator data reported during those periods, performance indicator definitions and guidance contained in NEI Document 99-02, "Regulatory Assessment Performance Indicator Guideline," Revision 5, and NUREG-1022, "Event Reporting Guidelines 10 CFR 50.72 and 50.73," definitions and guidance were used. The inspectors reviewed the licensee's operator narrative logs, issue reports, mitigating systems performance index derivation reports, event reports, and NRC integrated inspection reports for the period beginning the second quarter of 2008 through the second quarter of 2009 to validate the accuracy of the submittals. The inspectors reviewed the mitigating systems performance index component risk coefficient to determine if it had changed by more than 25 percent in value since the previous inspection, and if so, that the change was in accordance with applicable NEI guidance. The inspectors also reviewed the licensee's issue report database to determine if any problems had been identified with the performance indicator data collected or transmitted for this indicator and none were identified. Specific documents reviewed are described in the attachment to this report.
These activities constitute completion of one (1) mitigating systems performance index residual heat removal system sample as defined in Inspection Procedure 71151-05. b. Findings No findings of significance were identified. .4 Mitigating Systems Performance Index - Cooling Water Systems (MS10)
a. Inspection Scope The inspectors sampled licensee submittals for the Mitigating Systems Performance Index - Cooling Water Systems performance for the period from the second quarter of ERRATA - 18 - 2008 through the second quarter of 2009
. To determine the accuracy of the performance indicator data reported during those periods, performance indicator definitions and guidance contained in NEI Document 99-02, "Regulatory Assessment Performance Indicator Guideline," Revision 5, was used. The inspectors reviewed the licensee's operator narrative logs, issue reports, mitigating systems performance index derivation reports, event reports and NRC integrated inspection reports for the period beginning the second quarter of 2008 through the second quarter of 2009 to validate the accuracy of the submittals. The inspectors reviewed the mitigating systems performance index component risk coefficient to determine if it had changed by more than 25 percent in value since the previous inspection, and if so, that the change was in accordance with applicable NEI guidance. The inspectors also reviewed the licensee's issue report database to determine if any problems had been identified with the performance indicator data collected or transmitted for this indicator and none were identified. Specific documents reviewed are described in the attachment to this report. These activities constitute completion of one (1) mitigating systems performance index cooling water system sample as defined in Inspection Procedure 71151-05. b. Findings No findings of significance were identified. .16 Occupational Exposure Control Effectiveness (OR01)
a. Inspection Scope The inspector sampled licensee submittals for the Occupational Radiological Occurrences performance indicator for the first quarter of 2009 through the third quarter of 2009. To determine the accuracy of the performance indicator data reported during those periods, performance indicator definitions and guidance contained in NEI Document 99-02, "Regulatory Assessment Performance Indicator Guideline," Revision 5, were used. The inspector reviewed the licensee's assessment of the performance indicator for occupational radiation safety to determine if indicator related data was adequately assessed and reported. To assess the adequacy of the licensee's performance indicator data collection and analyses, the inspector discussed with radiation protection staff, the scope and breadth of its data review, and the results of those reviews. The inspector independently reviewed electronic dosimetry dose rate and accumulated dose alarm and dose reports and the dose assignments for any intakes that occurred during the time period reviewed to determine if there were potentially unrecognized occurrences. The inspector also conducted walkdowns of numerous locked high and very high radiation area entrances to determine the adequacy of the controls in place for these areas.
These activities constitute completion of the occupational radiological occurrences sample as defined in Inspection Procedure 71151-05.
b. Findings No findings of significance were identified.