RBG-23811, Forwards Description of Change to Initial Test Program Re Test Condition 4 Concerning Natural Circulation & Summary of Safety Evaluation,Per License NPF-47,Section 2.C(12)

From kanterella
Revision as of 13:20, 1 December 2021 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Description of Change to Initial Test Program Re Test Condition 4 Concerning Natural Circulation & Summary of Safety Evaluation,Per License NPF-47,Section 2.C(12)
ML20211E716
Person / Time
Site: River Bend Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 06/03/1986
From: Booker J
GULF STATES UTILITIES CO.
To: Martin R
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
References
RBG-23811, NUDOCS 8606160224
Download: ML20211E716 (2)


Text

. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _

e A

e GULF STATES UTILITIES COMPANY POSTOFFICE BOX 2961 . EEAUMoNT, TEXAS 77704 AREA CODE 409 832-663*

June 3, 1986 RBG- 23811 File Nos. G9.5, G9.25.1.5 Ifr. Robert D. Martin, Regional Administrator S. I'.2 clear Regulatory Commission .

]3 611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 1000 j 1

Arlington, TX 76011 l gg . g g

Dear Mr. Martin:

d River Bend Station - Unit 1 Docket No. 50-458 Attached for your information is a report containing a brief description of a change to the River Bend Station (RBS) initial test program (Test Condition 4 - Natural Circulation) and a summary of the safety evaluation for the change. This report is provided with regard to the RBS Facility Operating License NPF-47, Section 2.C(12).

Sincerely,

. E. W J. E. Booker Manager-Engineering, Nuclear Fuels & Licensing River Bend Nuclear Group JEB/ ERG /DAS/je cc: Director of Inspection & Enforcement U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 k

P

[

/7 f ,\

was ii,

r ATTACHMENT Summary Description of Change (Test Condition 4 - Natural Circulation)

Regulatory Guide 1.68 (Revision 2, August 1978), Appendix A, paragraph 5.0 requires that appropriate consideration be given to testing at the extremes of all possible operating modes for facility systems if the facility is intended to be operated in these modes. Test Condition 4 defines the region of the power / flow map at natural circulation near the 100% load line.

Testing of core performance and control system response was planned to be performed in this region; however, all testing in Test Condition 4 has been deleted.

Discussion Operation at natural circulation conditions is not an intended mode of operation for a BWR. Natural circulation conditions can only be reached as the result of an abnormal operational transient (two recirculation pump trip). Current Plant Technical Specifications only allow a very limited amount of time for operation at natural circulation (typically with no reactor coolant system recirculation loops in operation, the operator must immediately initiate measures to place the unit in at least the startup mode within 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> and in hot shutdown mode within the next 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br />). In addition, Service Information Letter 380 (SIL-380, Revision 1 "BWR Core Thermal Hydraulic Stability",

from General Electric Company dated February 10, 1984) recommends that with no reactor coolant system recirculation loops in operation the operator should immediately initiate an orderly reduction of thermal power to less than or equal to the 80% load line. Therefore, operation near the 100% load line at natural circulation is not an expected operating condition and testing of core performance and control systems is not required. Extensive special testing at natural circulation has previously been performed at several BWRs covering a wide range of plant and core ,

, designs. These tests have thoroughly characterized the performance of the BWR at natural circulation conditions.

Conclusion Testing of plant ystems is performed over a wide range of operating conditions representing the extremes of expected operating modes intended for the plant. These tests meet the objectives of Regulatory Guide 1.68, Appendix A, paragraph 5.0.

The proposed test change does not adversely affect any safety system or safe operation of the plant and therefore does not involve an unreviewed safety question. Test Condition 4 testing can therefore be deleted from the Power Ascension Test Program.