IR 05000298/1989021

Insp Rept 50-298/89-21 on 890626-30.No Violations or Deviations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Liquid, Gaseous & Solid Radwaste Sys

ML20247M176
Person / Time
Site:	Cooper
Issue date:	07/26/1989
From:	Baer R, Nicholas J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To:
Shared Package
ML20247M173	List: IR 05000298/1989021 ML20247M167
References
50-298-89-21, NUDOCS 8908010462
Download: ML20247M176 (16)

Text

{{#Wiki_filter:pppyy , gm j

          .
    ,
         * ^

_

       #

hys ' o >,,

         "

h yngY[[ x- 5>';

     '
,y-   3    ,, >

t, yj' ,. b%[

-
 ,
  ,

y n '

       ,
  '
 ,

n  : APPENDIX: wr , y fw,? @J g* J

  '
    '
     :U.S. NUCLEAR-REGULATORY-COMMISSION'

REGION IV-

"

4

 *

% -

  .NRCSInspecti6nReport:  50-298/89-21  Operating Licensei DPR-46 -
,

Docketip50-298; ,

         -
<
'f  x TLicensee': Nebraska Public; Power District (NPPD).

M P.0; Box 499

'

7, Y Columbus,-NebraskaL 68602-0 6 .

          ,
        ,

g : Facility 1Name: ' Cooper Nuclear: Station (CNS)

; 2 # LInspection' At:   CNSl Sit'e,.Brownville, Nebraska s  .
   .    '

SInspectihnConducted: .iJune'26-30,ii98 ,wp

~.4

    : # B.cNicholas, Senidr Radiation Specialist  Date M acilities Radiation Protection ~.Section-y
    .
     .
  : Approved: 9 '
  "'
    .I M datllI    "
        #F4/ M
,
*'    R. - E. -Baer, Chief,- Facilities Radiological: Date eg o'   * LProtection Section a   m
       ,
      ,
;m Inspection' Summary
     ',l
      <
      ,  ,
'j-
    ,
  -Inspection Conducted June 26-30', 1989 (Report 50-298/89-21)
       '
   '
          , <

a ' Areas'Insdected: Routine, uriannounced inspection of the licensee's liquid, g, gaseous,1and solid ~ radioactive Naste' systems; "

  .
   .
     .
     .

c Results: The NRC inspector' determined that the licensee was implementing the radioactive waste. effluent; program (RWEG in accordance with the Radiological

  . Effluent Technical Specifications (RETS) and Offsite Dose Assessment Manual!(ODAM). .The. licensee had performed 150 radioactive liquid batch 4   releases during 1988. The~ quantities of radionuclides released in the

/$ radioactive waste effluentszwere within the limits specified in.the RET Offsite?dosesfhad..beenLcalculated using methods described'and specified'in the ,

  ~0 DAM'and were'within. Technical Specification (TS) limits. The licensee had no unplanned radiologi. cal releases during.1988. The licensee had completed    ^l
  ;32 < radioactive material shipments by exclusive use vehicle to low level

' ' radwaste: burial sites and 7 spent fuel shipments.during 1988. The licentee had not-made any equipment or design changes in the radioactive waste mana[,ement

"  systems since April'1988. The licenseets ventilation systems had been tested in accordance with'TS requirements. Quality Assurance (QA) surveillance and    j j u[   h$k O

kO N [*

 '
 '

p  ! ilam -

c- 7

  -
   ,.

kk

 ,,
  .
,
   ,

.

'$ . *
 ..
 *

9 .;:

..  ,
    -

2-

,

audits. had:been performed as required and were technically comprehensive. The licensee had submitted changes ~to their Process Control Program (PCP) and ODAM

,

and had received NRC. approval for these changes. No Licensee Event Reports (LERS) had been written in 1988 involving radioactive effluent releas , activitie The' licensee.had submitted their Semiannual Effluent' Release Reports-for.1988 as per TS requirement Within.the ar,eas. inspected, no violations or deviations were identified. The licensee had-adequately addressed all previously identified NRC open items and NRC inspector observations in'the area of radioactive waste effluents. One new

.c .NRC inspector' observation for program improvement is discussed in paragraph q r

l l

         :
         !

l L L. _ _ _ m _ ._.m._ _ ._ .____________ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ . _ _ _ _ _ _

_ m o, L .

 - +
.. *
.'    -3--
. i'    DETAILS Persons Contacted NPPD
 * R. Horn, Division Manager, Nuclear Operations
'  * L. Beilke, Radiological Support Supervisor   i 13. D. Bray, Auxiliary Equipment Supervisor   ,
 *L. E. Bray, Regulatory Compliance Specialist   l K. L. Fike, Chemist '
 *J. R. Flaherty,' Plant Engineering Supervisor
 *R. L.'Gibson, Audit and Procurement QA Supervisor
 *S. J. Jobe, Acting Training Manager
 *R. J. Mcdonald,' Chemistry Superviso *J. M. Meacham~. Senior Manager of.0perations
  ,

L. A. Parks, Technical Systems Administrator 1 J. L. Peaslee, Surveillance Coordinator

 *C. Hc Putnam, Jr. , -Senior QA Specialist
 *J.LV. Sayer, Radiological' Manager
 *D. C. Shrader, Assistant to Operations Supervisor  ,

G. R.. Smith, Licensing Supervisor

      !

D. L. Snyder, Chemistry / Health Physics Training Instructor J. R. Warren, Senior Chemistry and Health Physics Specialist NRC-

 * R. Bennett, Senior Resident Inspector
 *G. A. Pick, Resident Inspector    ,

l

 * Denotes those present during the exit interview on June 30, 198 ' NRC Inspector Observation The following is an observation the NRC inspector discussed with the licensee during the exit interview on June 30, 1989. This observation is not a violation, deviation, unresolved item, or open item. This
 . observation was identified for licensee consideration for program P  improvement, but the observation has no specific regulatory requirement.

( The licensee stated that the observation would be evaluate l Monitoring Ventilation System Operating Hours - The licensee had not I developed a procedure for tracking ventilation system operating hours l l (see paragraph 6). i L l Organization and Management Controls (84750) The NRC inspector reviewed the licensee's organization, staffing, and staff functional assignments related to the liquid, gaseous, and solid radioactive waste programs to determine agreement with commitments in _-

   --

74 7, g77c 3;7 m' ,

 '

y '

   
    '

w 4 , [ 't N? .

   '
  .
    [ [

s m cl[. '

@   <
>

g

:)[-

1 m SectiontXIII?ofcthe Updated Safety Analysis Report (USAR) and compliance-Lwith the requirements in Section 6.1 of;the T ~ o :The.NRC 1'nspector verified that the organizational structures of'the CN ' ~ radwaste operations section and chemistry / radiochemistry section-(C/RS)

  : responsible' for: the' RWEP and solidification of radioactive' waste were as
  .

s , defined in theLUSAR and.T The CNS staff' assignments, management control-procedures,7and positionfdescriptions were reviewed for the assignment of' g'  ? responsibilities for the' management and' implementation of the CNS RWEP and

  . solid' radioactive waste programs. The organizational structure and
 '

- 7 " st'affing of the. radwaste. operations section and.C/RS for managing and

  : implementing:the.RWEP.and radwaste solidification program appeared to be
-

Tsufficient..to meet'the requirements 1for the routine performance of the liquid, gaseous,;and-solid radwaste activities. The-NRC inspector.- verified that.the administrative control responsibilities specified in the CNS procedures were.being implemented. . Selected procedures listed in-Attachment 1.to this' report were reviewe LThe!NRC' inspector reviewed.the staffing'of the radwaste operations section

*

Tand'the C/RS and determined that both sections were. fully staffed. Since the' previous.NRC RWEP inspection in April 1988, the. licensee's C/RS had experi.enced the replacement- of two chemistry technicians. This represents an approximate'25 percent turnover of C/RS technician' staff

    ~

No violations or deviations were identifie '4.- ' Training and Qualifications -(84750) The NRC' inspector reviewed.the licensee's' training and qualification program for C/RS personnel responsible for conducting the RWEP to ietermine agreement with commitments in Section XIII of the USAR and-comp 1iance with the' requirements in Section 6.1.4 of the T 'The NRC inspector reviewed the qualifications of the present C/RS staff and selected nonlicensed station operators responsible for the implementation of the RWEP and radwaste solidification programs and , Lverified that'they met the required qualifications specified in the USAR 1 and TS. It was determined that the licensee had an adequately qualified 1 staf The NRC. inspector reviewed individual staff training records for selected-C/RS personnel who perform RWEP activities. The NRC inspector verified that a'11 C/RS technicians responsible for RWEP activities had completed-the' required training .on the RETS and radwaste systems to perform liquid and. gaseous effluent release No violations or deviations were identifie ] I _ _ __ --

.
., .. .

   -5 ' Liquid Radioactive Wastes (84750)
'The NRC inspector reviewed the licensee's liquid radioactive waste effluent program including: liquid waste system installation and operation, liquid waste sampling, liquid waste process and effluent monitors, procedures for liquid. waste effluent systems, and reactor water '

quality to determine g reement with commitments in Sections VII-12, IX-2, I and IX-6 of the USAR and compliance.with the requirements in Sections.3/4.2, 3/4.21, 6.3, 6.7, and 6.8 of the TS and the ODA The NRC. inspector reviewed the licensee's implementation of the RETS and ODAM to ensure agreement with analysis. sensitivities, reporting limits, analytical results, sampling requirements, surveillance tests, RWEP operating procedures,-offsite dose results from liquid effluents, and functional checks and calibrations of equipmer.L associated with the radioactive liquid waste processing system. Selected documents and records listed in Attachment 1 to this report were reviewe The NRC i'nspector reviewed current approved revisions of CNS procedures

. governing the. release of-liquid radioactive waste. These liquid effluent release procedures provide for the following: sampling of radioactive waste; chemical and radionuclides analyses prior to release; calculation of effluent release rates,' effluent radiation monitor setpoints, projected offsite rv %nuclide concentrations, and offsite doses prior to release; recording efflutnt dilution parameters during releases; and verifying discharge flow rates and effluent volume discharged. Selected documents and records listed in Attachment I to this report were reviewe The NRC inspector reviewed a representative number of liquid release permits for the period January 1988 through May 1989. It was determined
.that the processing, sampling, and analysis of liquid radioactive waste effluent and the approval'and performance of liquid radioactive waste discharges were conducted in accordance with CNS procedures. Quantities of radioactive nuclides released in the liquid effluents were within the limits specified in the RETS. Offsite doses had been calculated according to the ODAM and were within the TS limits. The NRC inspector verified that'the offsite dose calculations performed biweekly by the " Effects" computer program were identical to dose calculations performed using ODAM methodologie The NRC inspector reviewed source checks, channel functional tests, ,

calibrations, and alarm / trip setpoint procedures and records for i

      ~

radioactive waste liquid effluent monitors and verified that the frequency of channel functional tests and calibrations met TS requirements. The NRC inspector verified that the licensee had performed the monitor calibrations using radioactive standards in the same media and configuration as the actual liquid samples being measured in the liquid j effluent streams. The radioactive standards used were traceable to the { , National Institute of Standards and Technology and were of various l activity levels to cover the entire range of each monitor. The monitor I i .

. .. ..
'
   -6-calibrations and setpoint determina+'ons were verified to have been performed according to approved precedures and the ODA l The NRC ' inspector reviewed selected procedures and reactor water chemistry records for the period January 1988 through May 1989. The records reviewed indicated that all required sampling and analyses were performed at the. frequencies required by the TS and the analytical results did not indicate excessive radioactivity which would influence the radioactivity discharged in the liquid radioactive waste effluent The NRC inspector determined that no design changes had been made to the liquid radwaste systems since the previous NRC inspection conducted in April 198 No violations or deviations were identifie . Gaseous Radioactive Wastes (84750)

The NRC inspector reviewed the licensee's gaseous radioactive waste effluent program including: gaseous waste system installation and operation, gaseous waste sampling, gaseous process and effluent monitors, procedures for gaseous waste effluent systems, and air cleaning systems to determine agreement with commitments in Sections VII-12,'IX-4, and IX-5 of

 'the USAR and compliance with the requirements in Sections 3/4.2, 3/4.7, 3/4.12, 3/4.21, 6.3, 6.7, and 6.8 of the TS and ODA The NRC inspector reviewed the licensee's implementation of the RETS and ODAM to_ ensure agreement with analysis sensitivities, reporting limits, analytical results, sampling requirements, su*veillance tests, RWEP operating procedures, offsite dose results from gaseous effluents, and functional checks and calibrations of equipment associated with the radioactive gaseous waste processing system. Selected documents and records listed in Attachment I to this report were reviewe The NRC inspector reviewed current approved revisions of CNS procedures governing the release of gaseous radioactive waste. These gaseous effluent release procedures provide for: the sampling of gaseous radioactive waste, calculation of offsite radionuclides concentrations and doses, calculations and verification of gaseous effluent radiation monitor setpoints, and verification of discharge flow rates and effluent volume discharged. Selected documents and records listed in Attachment I to this report were reviewe {

The NRC inspector reviewed selected analyses of samples taken from the elevated release point, reactor building ventilation, augmented radwaste building ventilation, and turbine building ventilation continuous release paths for the period January 1988 through May 1989. It was determined i that the continuous gaseous waste releases were being performed according l to procedure and the quantities of gaseous radioactive nuclides released l were within the limits specified in the RETS. Offsite doses had been I calculated according to the ODAM, updated biweekly, and were within the TS _ __ _

W"'

 ' W 1 y    l
      ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~~ ~ ~

iQ };; ., j:  : , ,lel

  ~

Jyl % w , -

     '

4_

      -
,         1
.

limits. iTheNRC) inspector' reviewed'dailyreadingstaken'fromthenoble

. x   gas monitor and recorded on the appropriate' data form and' determined that r   the'TS' requirement was being met. The NRC inspector: reviewed selected-F,,  .
  . operations! daily. surveillance log sheets.for the. period January 1988-through Mayz l989 and verified continuous monitoring of the: hydrogen:

concentration in the augmented offgas treatment system downstream of th : recombiners'; The;NRC inspector determined that no design changes had been' i made.to the' gaseous radwaste management. system since the previous NRC ,

  -inspection.in April 198 '
        '
  '

m 4 The NRC . inspector reviewed source' checks, channel functional tests,

<  ,

calibrations, and alarm.setpoint. procedures:and records for gaseous radioactive waste. effluent monitors and. verified that the frequency'of the- .i various checks-and calibrations met TS requirement The NRC inspector verified that the licensee.had performed initial monitor calibrations 4

  .using gaseous radioactive-standards in the same configuration as the
        '
'
.

actual gaseous samples being measured in the gaseous effluent stream TheLroutine monitor' calibrations were being performed using radioactive standards traceable'to.the National Institute of Standards and Technology-Land.were of various~ activity levels to cover the entire range of each monitor. The: monitor calibrations'and setpoint determinations were

  . verified to have been performed according to approved procedures and the 00AM;
  :The NRC' inspector reviewed the licensee's procedures, surveillance tests, and-selected records and test results for maintenance and testing of air
  . cleaning' systems'which.contain high efficiency particulate air (HEPA)

filters and activated charcoal adsorbers. The NRC inspector verified that the: licensee's procedures and surveillance tests provided for the required '! periodic functional checking of ventilation system components, evaluation of HEPA'and activated: charcoal adsorbers, and replacement and in place filter testing of the filter systems. The NRC inspector reviewed records and test results for the period January 1988 through May 1989 for the main control. room emergency ventilation and the standby gas treatment air cleaning. systems. The in place filter testing and activated charcoal laboratory tests had been performed in accordance with approved procedures

     .

by a-contract laboratory and all test results were verified to be within TS limits. The.NRC, inspector noted that the TS requirement of testing the various ventilation systems activated charcoal adsorber material after-every 720 hours of operation was being tracked by the licensee's surveillance coordinator. However, the tracking'of ventilation system operating hours between sampling and laboratory testing of the activated

'
  . charcoal adsorber material was being performed informally using data collected'from the ventilation equipment operation surveillance test The licensee had not developed a procedure or surveillance test to monitor and control the various ventilation systems' operation hours so as not to  ;
,

exceed the 720-hour operation criteria between testings of the activated charcoal adsorber material as specified by TS. This observation was discussed with the licensee during the inspection and at the exit interview on June 30, 1989. The licensee agreed to evaluate the NRC inspector's concern and take the necessary action to establish a procedure

        !
 -  _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - _ _ - _ _ _ _ - - .-

= r -- -

 ^
;;. .
 . : . . .

6: . l to formally monitor the operating' hours of the various ventilation systems requiring TS testin No violations or deviations were identifie . ' Solid Radioactive Wastes (84750) The NRC inspector reviewed the licensee's solid radioactive waste program to determine agreement with commitments in Section,IX-3 of the USAR and compliance with the requirements in Sections 3/4.21.E, 6.6, and 6.8 of the T The NRC inspector reviewed the licensee's implementation of the radwaste solidification. program as described by the licensee's PCP and approved operating procedures. The NRC inspector reviewed the' licensee's PCP which' had received NRC approval in a letter dated March 20, 1989. Selected procedures. listed in Attachment I to thisLreport were reviewe . i The NRC inspector reviewed the records of saepling'and testing of radwaste stream samples prior to solidification and the drum inspections of solidified radioactive waste for free standing wuter prior to capping and

  , sealing the drum The NRC inspector verified tha; the TS requirements were being me The NRC inspector reviewed the certificate of calibration on the chilled mirror hygrometer performed by a contractor on May 1,1989, on the licensee's spent resin dewatering system. The NuPac spent resin dewatering system is now installed permanently in the plant and in full operation. The NRC inspector reviewed the licensee's system description which will be included in 1990 revision to the USAR and found it to be sati sf actor The NRC inspector determined that a contract laboratory was being used by the licensee for characterization analyses of radioactive waste stream The licensee had submitted the 1989 samples of waste streams for analysis to meet the requirements of 10 CFR Part 61.56. The NRC inspector reviewed the results of these waste stream sample analyses and found the results sati sf actor The NRC inspector determined that no design changes had been made to the radioactive waste solidification and dewatering systems and equipment since the previous NRC inspection in January 198 No violations or deviations were identifie . QA Audit Program (84750)

The NRC inspector reviewed the licensee's QA audit and surveillance programs for the RWEP to determine agreement with commitments in i Section XIII of the USAR and compliance with the requirements in i Section 6.2 of the TS.

,

.- .--m____m_ _ _ - _ _ . _ - _ -

_ ,-

'.; s 4 .
# 0 t t
'
    -9 The NRC inspector reviewed the QA surveillance and audit plans and checklists, selected QA department proceduresi audit and surveillance schedules for 1988 and 1989, and the qualifications and training.of the QA
 . auditors performing the surveillance and audits of RWEP and solid radwaste packaging and handling. Selected QA surveillance and audit reports concerning QA activities performed during 1988 and through May 1989 in the areas of radwaste processing were reviewed for scope to

_ ensure thoroughness of program evaluation and timely followup of identified findings. The NRC inspector found the audit ' plans, checklists, and surveillance improved since the previous. review in April 1988. The

     .

licensee's QA au'dit checklists for inspection of the RETS and ODAM were expanded and. contained more detail analysis. The NRC inspector noted that the QA auditors had attended specific + raining in the station radwaste management systems and RWEP procedures. QA audits reviewed are listed in Attachment 1 to this repor The NRC inspector determined that the licensee was using a contractor laboratory to perform the "Fe analysis on the radioactive liquid effluent quarterly composite samples as required by TS and the characterization analyses,of radioactive waste streams which are dewatered or solidified

 - for burial. The licensee was also using a contractor to perform in place filter testing and laboratory charcoal adsorber analyses on the station ventilation systems as required by TS. The licensee had performed QA audits on both of these contractors and had placed them on the CNS approved supplier lis The NRC inspector reviewed the audits performed by the licensee on the two contractors and found the audits to be adequat No violations or deviations were identifie . Licensee Event Reports (84750)

The NRC inspector determined that the licensee had not written any LERs since the previous NRC inspection of the radioactive waste effluents program in April 1988 that involved radioactive effluent release activitie No violations or deviations were identifie . Reports of Radioactive Waste Effluents (84750) The NRC inspector reviewed the licensee's reports concerning radioactive waste systems and effluent releases for compliance with the requirements of 10 CFR Part 50.36(a)(2) and Section 6.5.1.F of the T The NRC inspector reviewed the semiannual effluent release reports for the periods January I through June 30, 1988, and July 1 through December 31, 1988. These reports were wr'tten in the format described in NRC Regulatory Guide 1.21 and contained the information required by TS.

During the period January 1 through December 31, 1988, the licensee had l performed 150 liquid batch releases and had completed 32 radioactive

       !

Y --__2_._._.__ - _-_

        -

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ , l';

'

e

 .  .
 ,
  '
  *

e .'.

 '
     -10-i i

material' shipments by exclusive use. vehicle to burial sites in Washington

   .and Nevada. 'The licensee had also performed 7- spent fuel shipments' during 1988. _.The licensee had no unplanned radiological releases to the environment during 1988. The licensee included in the July 1 through-December 31, 1988, semiannual report the detailed changes to the ODAM and PCP'as per TS' requirement No violations or deviations were identifie .' Exit Interview (30703)

The NRC inspector met with the NRC resident inspectors and the licensee representatives denoted in paragraph 1 at the conclusion of the inspection on June 30, 1989. The NRC inspector summarized the scope and findings of the inspection and discussed.the NRC inspector's observation. The-licensee representatives stated at.the exit interview that they would evaluate the NRC inspector's observation and concern and take necessary action to implement program improvement. The licensee did not identify as proprietary any of'the materials provided to or reviewed by the inspector during the inspectio I

. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . __

_ '

 ,

_ __ - _ _ _ _

     ,
,
  '
    ',

fx

     '
  '    '

q . u,y -

  ,
    ,
      ,
): '. s    i
     >fATTNCHMENT1
,

COOPER NUCLEAR STATION v ,

      ,
' NRC Inspection Report 50-298/89 521'

Documents' Reviewe '

       ~.  ,
     ,-    .

Title Revision Date

     '
( ,
 , Administrative Procedures   '

O.2, Station Organization' arid Responsibilit . 7 06/08/89 e 0.17, Selection and Traini'ng of Station Personnel 9 01/27/89 0.26', -Surveillance

   - Program   3 12/08/88
 : System Operating Procedures'
 ,
         ..

_

'

2.2.62. Radioactive Waste System - Gaseo'us 16 10/06/88 2.2.73, Standby Gas' Treatment System 20 06/01/89 ~.Radwaste Procedure .5.1.'1, Radwaste Low Conductivity Liquid 8 06/21/89

   . Condensate Backwasir Tank Fluid Transfer   ,

2.5.1.2, Radwaste Low Conductivity. Liquid Waste 14 04/27/89

   . Condensate Phase Separator Fluid Transfer 2.5.1.3, Radwaste Low Conductivity Liquid Waste  10 04/27/89 Spent Resin Tank Fluid Transfer 2.5.1."4,~Radwaste; Low Conductivity Liquid Waste  8 01/21/88 Collector Processing 2.5.1.5, Radwaste. Low Conductivity Liquid Waste  9 01/21/88 Surge Tank Processing 2.5~.1.6, Radwaste Low Conductivity Liquid Waste  19 05/17/88 Sample' Tank Fluid Transfer 2.5.1.7, RWCU Phase Separator Tank Transfer  12 04/27/89 2.5.2.1, Radwaste High Conductivity Liquid Waste  9 04/27/89
-

and. Waste Sludge Tank Fluid Transfer 12.5.2.2, Radwaste High Conductivity Liquid We.ste 9 01/21/88 Flcor Orain Processing x _ _ _ __ ._

,
, . g ~ ~ --   -

t

' '  o i ;
  '
 '

- 1  ; [.[ ,

,'
,
 ,
     .-2-
:' 
-
'

iA 2.5.2.3, Radwaste High Conductivity Liquid Wast ~

      .31 04/06/89
 ,
 , ,   -Floor Drain. Sample Tank Fluid Transfer

. . I 2.5.2.4, Chemical Waste Tank Transfer 6- 09/11/87 2.5.4.1, Solid Wet Wasta Packaging, Storage, and 14 06/26/86-a Transfer System 2.5.4.2, Solid Wet Waste Drum Filling 5 -10/29/84 2.5.4.3, Radwaste Drum Mixer Operation 6 09/25/86 I 2.5.4.4, NUPAC Dewatering System 0 04/27/89 Surveillance Procedures 6.2.4.1, Daily Surveillance Log (Technical 61 04/14/88 Specifications) I' 6.2.6.1,'Off Gas System Auto Isolation Functional 15 06/01/89 Test 6.2.6.2, Augmented Off. Gas Hydrogen Monitors 3 09/15/88 Calibration 6.2.6.4,' Off Gas Flow' Monitor Calibration - 9 07/21/88 6.2.6.7, Steam Jet Air Ejector Flow Monitor 4 09/15/88-Calibration 6.2.6.8,-Augmented Off Gas Hydrogen Monitors 3 12/23/87 Functional Tes .3.7.2, Off Gas Radiation Monitor Source Check 24 02/03/89 Test-6.3.7.2.1, Off Gas Radiation ' Monitor Functional Test 0 12/29/88 l 6.3.7.2.2, Off Gas Raciation Monitor Caliteration and 0 12/29/88 Functional Test 6.3.7.2.3, Off Gas-Radiation Monitor Linearity Test 0 05/09/89

,    and Efficiency Determination 6.3.7.3, Liquid Radwaste Effluent Flow Monitor 2 02/20/89 e-    Calibration    ,

6.3.7.4, SW Radiation Monitor Instrument Channel 16 12/08/88 Test I , !

        !

i

..A.h..___.iA _ . _ . . . _  _ _ _

h (p ' ,

  '
     ,
       '
"g , .
*
, ', , @ '
;e
      '

o -3-E

  "6.3.7.4.1, SW Radiation Monitor Instrument ~  0~ 12/08/88
#- ,    Calibration Test 6.3.7.~4.2, SW Radiation Monitor Known Source  0- 12/08/88
   ' Calibration 6.3.7.5, Reactor Building Ventilation Radiation 13 -01/19/89
   ' Source' Chec .3.7.5.1,' Reactor Building Ventilation Radiation- 0 11/17/88 Moni tor ' Calibration and' Functieaal Test / Source Check 6.3.7.6, Liquid Radwaste Effluent. Flow Monitor 1- 05/10/88 Functional Test
,

6.3.7.7, Liquid Radwaste. Effluent System. Functional 17 03/16/89 Test 6.3.7.7.1,. Liquid Radwaste Effluent System . 0 03/16/89 Calibration Test 6.3.7.7.2, Liquid Radwaste Monitor Known Source- 0 03/16/89 Calibration 6.3.7.8,'ERP Radiation' Monitor (Kaman) Known Source' 24 03/12/87 Calibration Check / Functional Test 6.3.17-.1, Control Room Ventilation 13 03/05/87 6.3.17.3, Control Room Emergency Fan Filter Train 6 01/23/86'

   . Differential Pressure Test 6.3.17.4, Control Room Emergency Fan HEPA Filter 9 08/11/88 Leak Test 6.3.17.5, Control Room Emergency Fan Charcoal Leak, 10 08/04/88 Charcoal Sampling, and Fan Capacity Testing 6.3.19.1, SGT Operability Test /Off-Gas Flow Monitor 19 03/03/88 Functional Test 6.3;19.'2, SGT. Filter Differential Pressure, Heater 12 10/06/88 Output, and Fan Motor Running Current Test 6.3.19.3.1, SGT Train A HEPA Filter Leak and Housing 0 03/03/88

' Door Seal Leak Test 6.3.19.3.2,-SGT Train B HEPA Filter Leak and Housing 0 03/03/88 Door Seal Leak Test _ - - _ - - _ _ - . - - .

g - . 7; .

    , , . , .. ,

f" Q

-     -

ff.

ww ;; $ "'( y Lg - *

<

We .

,

6.3.19.4, SGT Charcoal Filter Leak and Fan Capacity

  .

14 09/17/87 i . Test 6.3.19.5,'SGT Charcobl Filter. Carbon Analysis - 9 05/01/86 Methyl Iodide

     '
,

6.4.6.1),ReactorBuilding'AirSamplingSystem 27 03/12/87 (Kaman) Functional-Test and:Known Source Calibration Check

  .6.4.6.3, Control Room Air Sampling System Functional 28. 04/26/89 and Logic Tests 6.4'6.3.1,
  . Control. Room Air Sampling ~ System Known 0 03/09/89
   ' Source Calibration-
 '

s <

6.4 3.3.2, Control Room Air, Sampling System 1 04/29/89 Calibration and Functional Test 6.4.6.4,. Turbine' Building' Air Sampling System' < 28 03/12/87 <

  (Kaman) Functional Test and Known Source'

i Calibration Check

    ,

6.4.6.5, Radwaste Building Air Sampling. System 19 03/12/87-

  (Kaman) Functional Test and Known Source Calibration Check   ,

6.4.6.9, Turbine Building Air Sampling System .4 04/07/88 Electronic Calibration Test

  ;6.4.6.10, EPR Radiation Monitor System (Kaman)  5 09/15/88
  ~ Electronic Calibration Test c  6.4.6.11, Radwaste Building Air Sampling' System  3 03/10/88 (Kaman) Electronic Calibration Test 6.4.6.12, Reactor Building Air Sampling System  4 03/10/88 (Kaman) Electronic Calibration Test 6.4.6.13, Turbine Guilding Ventilation Flow Monitor 2 05/12/B8 Calibration Test 6.4.6.14, Reactor Building Ventilation Flow Monitor 4 04/13/89 Calibration Test 6.4.6.15, Radwaste Building Ventilation Flow Monitor 2 03/02/89 Calibration Test 6.4.6.16,. Steam Jet Air Ejector Flow Monitor  2 08/26/88 Functional Test
-

I r '

 ' -

E.__ _

nyppsy<m y>m..~r . y:g,, r- m g

       ,
        +

m

        - ~  -7 , .
           . ,
            -

3: 7 n

                   ,
                   .
                    - - uq a   ' > w . .     +   ,s :n .
          "

L'

                =
                 < x '  . y ' 'i
     '   "<
        *

hW  :[ d * &[Qwb..Mik[; b @.s(%ddM* &"B -

,
 ..
 .
    -  - 3a %. ,
             ..
              ~ ' ,
               .
         ' ' ' '
                  '*

i k ' '

          ,e
: ;            -5,        , I
' s , @pi g ;_   '   ' '

Q, " , .;

    .'.
        ,
       ~

r < :,i

 .

v1 .I l h h'.,@'hh

$     b #. Ij(
           '

a Ug [;ij:. , .- l

   ,
    ,g     ,

(ypy , c; ; , , ,

               !;  <

i q <

    . 6[4.6.17f Reactor,BuildinD Ventilation l Flow Monitor        2'  02/01/88  -
, f@ N :    *

M ' ~ Functional;Te,st ' wv' , y, < _ y '

               ,
                  ,
                   ,

g M< ' -(6f4 6[18,?Ridwasti;Buildihg VhntilationcFlow Monitors '3 T 02/01/88 j'

                    -

,4 v , ,

       ! Functional   Testi  t,  ,

P '

                   ,

w-

  ,
  -
   ,

o

    .

i m -

             .n
     . m      ,, .  ,

h' ;0.4f6119, TurbineJBuildirg. Ventilation Flow Monitor J3' 02/01/PB; ' g ,

       :FunctionaloTest       ,
     < .  .
        . . e ,
            '
 .
  '

1 ; Chemistry Procedures , , 3;5 ' ' ij .

   ,    f h     ~8;2.1,' Chemistry.Analys"isean'd Instrument Calibration }15'  ~

03/07/89.

c y ,< , i Schedule ' ( ^~g1

 '

p,. c

  ,w   .[..  .
       . , + .F    '
             '
- '

1- l8.4LRoutineSamplihgPhocedureabd. Liquid / Gas. . ,V ,4 j ' 10/01/87 N(2# e'= Sample-Points -3 ? P

             ~

F C

      '

Vi d ' .

        .
        . W . ' '

f % L, L8.6.2, ERP,and' Vent' Monitor On,librations s

               '
               '14  02/08/88 g   #

qb'- 8.8.1.14,. Radiochemical Analysis'. Iodines

       .

9- 11/13/86 x

.

s '

   <

3 /8.8.1.17,lRadiochemi.calNobleGsSampling lo 08/27/87 g ~W "

  .

8.8.1.25, Radiochemical Strontium and Yttrium 12/19/88-Q' 8 y '

     ,
       ', Analysis / ;O  ,

hm '

        '
         .  .. . .
                .

(F ,,

    ,

8.8.1.31, Radiochemn:al' Analysis of' Tritium 2' 04/22/88 M* ' L8.8.4, Off Gas Grab Samples 4 Isotopic Analysi /29/87- r 'J J

          '
   >
    - 8.8.5,-Determination of-Off-Gas Flo4 Rat ,3  'ul/15/87-
  -
,
   .;
  , ' ' " ,'8.8;7," iAnalysis:  Liquid Waste Discharge Preparation and'       'll-  11/09/88 u
 '
  .

8.8.8, Particulate, Iodine, and N$ble Gas. Sample ' 10 04/15/87

     ' Collection ~for Effluent' Monitors
    '

? 'l '

'

- i8.8211,' Liquid-Radioactive Waste Discharge 1?' 04/28/89

 ' '

!,*-

      . Authorization-W   <
  '  ' '

8.11.1,. Effects Program 2 10/21/88

-  ;
  >
                    .i
"

N  ; ' Chemistry Data Forms Li . - -

  -

8.2.12.0.1, 8.4.1.1.1,"8.4.5.1.6-C, 8.4.5.3.4-A, 8.4.5.3.4-B, 8.4.5.3.5-B,

,

8.4;7.2.2, 8.4.8.2.2, 8.4 11.1.2-A, 8.4.11.2.2-A, 8.4.11.3.2-A, 8.4.11.9.2, .

' *.  ,   > S.4.12.1.2-A,'.8.4.12.2;5-A, 8.4.12.2.5-8, 8.4.12.2.5-C, 8.4.12.3.2-A,
:  <<.  , 8.5.513.5,'8.5.8.2.5, 8.5.11.10-A, 8.5.12. .
 . ,
 'yt #
 -y:
 .
 ,, y ' -

qi , _ _ _ _ _ - __---.--__.-___.__-____-_--Q

p:m ,

       - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
,p  ; *
  ;.
,
 . l, , ' _ O . -

'

:     . . "[

pc

,
  ' Quality Assurance (QA) Audits a

QA Audit Report 88-17, QAP-900 --' Chemistry, performed August 23 through

  : October 26, 1988 QA Audit Report 88-12, QAP-1200 - Radioactive Waste Treatment.r.nd Disposal, >

performed July;through August 31, 1588-QA Vendor Audit, Supplirr Reapproval - TMA/Noreal Corporation, dated - e

        *
  ' February 7, 1989
'
  ~ QA Vendor Audit, Supplier Reapproval - NCS Corporat' ion,-dated Uecember 5, 1986 Cooper Nuclear' Station Semiannual Effluent Release Reports January 1 th"ounh June 30, 1988 July 1 thrcagh December 31, 1988 I

. hf c-t i d __________ _ _ _ _ . _ _ . _ _ _ }}