IR 05000298/1989030

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Insp Rept 50-298/89-30 on 890807-11.Violation Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Qa Program Re Document Control
ML20246F832
Person / Time
Site: Cooper Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 08/24/1989
From: Barnes I, Stewart R
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To:
Shared Package
ML20246F820 List:
References
50-298-89-30, NUDOCS 8908310146
Download: ML20246F832 (7)


Text

p' >

n

.

.

c p.

,

a

,

'

'

'

w

-

,

! ; Q' V i-

'

-

,

,

M '

a" APPENDIX

'

-

y

,

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY. COMMISSION

'

,

.

REGION.IV-

,,

,

y v

'

,

J.h

NRC. Inspection. Report
i 50-298/89-30 Operating. License: DPR-46

,

Cg

.,

.

,a.

.

Docket: !50-298

.r

~

,

'

t.

Fx

.

'

,

.

.

,

.

p..

Licensee: Nebraska.Public Power' District

'

..

'

^

,P.O. Box 499

.

M-Columbus, NE -68601

,

'FacilityName: Cooper Nuclear Station (CNS)'

^

l

T..

.

,

.

,

.

..

p

. Inspection.At: Cooper Nuclear Station Brownville,' Nebraska

- f

..

^

A Inspection Conducted:~ August 7 11.-1989

',

'

,

.s

-

~

,,.

. Inspector: -

m

.

M

N_

"

. St~ey" art, Relictor Inspector, Materials Date R. nd(QuaQity.ProgramsSection,Divisionof

, Reactor, Safety.

=

,

/

,

_

C IW Approved:

-

I.

aqnes, hief. Marterials and Quality

..

Date.

rograms Section, Division of Reactor Safety-Inspection Summary Inspection Conducted August 7-11, 1989 (Report 50-298/89-30)

~AreaDInspectedi' Routine, unannounced inspection of the licensee's quality assurance program relating to document control.

. R'esults:. Within the area inspected ons violation was identified but was not

.i cited. The licensee's control of drawings and procedures met commitments and-no-significant problems were identified. The administration of Technical Specification changes and the Final Safety Analysis Report were not

. inspected.

,

8908310146 890825 ADOCK0500gg, PDR Q

'

-

_

_ _ _____________ ___ _ __ i 1

-

_

- _ -

_

. __

- _ _ - -

-

-__

'

.. -

..

Mt og :(..

.,.

m-2.

'

'

DETAILS 1.

Persons Contacted NPPD'

  • G. R. Horn, Division Manager of Nuclear Operations-u
  • G. E. Smith, Quality Assurance (0A): Manager J. M. Meacham, Senior Manager of Technical, Support
  • E. M. Mace, Engineering Manager.

.

,

  • L.~ E. Bray,: Regulatory Compliance Specialist -
  • H. T. Hitch, Plant Services Manager C. R. Moeller, Technical Staff Supervisor J. R. Flaherty, Supervisor, Plant Engineering G. Hanson, Engineering Specialist H. D. Hitzel, Control Room Supervisor
  • L. Dunn, Records Specialist iR. Ulmer, Engineering Programs J. Peaslee, Surveillance Coordinator R. L. Gibson, Audit and Procurement QA Supervisor-NRC
  • I. Barnes, Chief,' Materials and Quality Programs section, Division of Reactor Safety
  • G. A. Pick, Resident Inspector

.

The NRC inspectors also interviewed other licensee personnel during the course of the-inspection.

  • Denotes those persons who attended the exit interview on August 11, 1969.

2.

Document Control Program (39702)

The objectives of this inspection were to ascertain whether the licensee is_ implementing a quality assurance program' relating to document control that is in:conformance with Technical Specifications, regulatory requirements, commitments in the Final Safety Analysis Report, and

'

applicable industry guides and standards, a.

Procedure Review During the inspection, the inspector reviewed the following procedures pertaining to document control:

Plant Services Procedure 1.10. " Document Control," Revision 4,

dated June 28, 1989 CNS Engineering Procedure 3.8, " Drawing Control Procedure,"

Revision 3, dated April 13, 1989

'

s j'i _

g{

,

x

~~

~

~

-

~

~ ~~

.

,

, 3r,

,

.

m

)

};

'

-;

,

hyQ je'

.,,.

,

..

'

'

'

l

,

^'

~'

J-3.

,

,

. b.

. yi 5 -

e

'

CNS Procedure 0.4, " Preparation, Review, and Approval of'

'

Procedures," Revision'14, dated May 3.-1989

'

'

=*-'

CNS Procedure 0.24. " Generating and Dispositioning Ven' dor Manual J

. Change Requests," Revision 3, dated May 12,.1988-

,

>

~'

..

.o

.

y CNS Procedure 0.25. " Vendor Manual. Change Order Revision.and n

. Approval," Revision 4,;cated May 11, 1988

'

I

'

Plant Services Procedure 1.9, " Control and Retention of

-

Records'," Revision 12 dated February 23, 1989

.

m

..

-

y

~

/

CNS Technical Specifications, Section 6.0-

e c

.

,

During the review, the inspectcr observed that-the,11censee's

. commitments included the applicable document control sections-of:.

*

, ANSI /ANS-3.2-1982, " Administrations Centrols and Quality

,

".

Assurance for the Operational Phase of Nuclear, Power Plants."',

.

ANSI N45.2.9-1974, " Requirements for Collection, Storage,.

  • -

Maintenance of Quality Assurance' Records for Nuclear Power?

.

Plants."

'

'

10 CFR 50; Appendix B,, Criterion VI.

  • s

. o

,

.bJ Drawing Control

'

CNS Engt'neering Procedure 3 8, " Drawing Control Procedure,"

,

prescribes the control and distribution'of approved drawings at the'.

-

CNS._

The licensee's primary drawing control = system depends on microfilm

'. aperture cards updated by the engineering division in the General

. Office. The drating change system' depends on~ drawings marked with

~

various colors to denote' additions and deletions to the drawing.

These marked-up drawings are attached to a Design Change Notice (DCN)

.which records the drawing and revision being changed and the

'

engineering approval. The aperture: card and all' official ~hard copies of the drawing are annotated to reference the DCN number. Hard copy stick type files of drawings are located in the. site engineering work

,

areaiin the control room, in the instrumentation and control shop, u

in the Emergency Operations Facility (EOF), and in the training section area. :The electrical maintenance shop also has copies of

.

. electrical elementary drawings.

The drawing distribution function is performed by the records s

administration section at the-General Offices. Distribution is K

3_..

'

determined by the CNS (site) Engineering Department and controlled by an assigned engineering specialist. During this review, the inspector randomly selected six DCNs from the engineering

'

,

. _ - - _ _ -. _ _ _. -. - - -. - - - _ _ _ - _

__

--

-_

,

.

.

ca ' -

>

-

'

,

,

-

,

-

-

<

,

k.gL

.

?

'

+

r f

'-

>

~~

,

'

_4 b

'

'

>

specialist's master log sheets (which reflect the latest drawing'

changes distributed to drawing. custodians).-

,

LThe inspectorLreviewed the stick files cf.each custodian.. including

',

the. control room,' electrical maintenance hop and the engineering.

' department. All selected DCNs were the latestfdrawing revisions and'

K

-

m appeared to be controlled as prescribed by CNS Procedure 3.8.

[.

'

During.the initial review of DCNs by the inspector, DCN 88-186 (Retrieval No. 454006806) was selected from the master files.' The

' drawing change appeared to;be a minor correction; however, the L

inspector observed that the DCN was missing the identity of the.

-originatoriand the necessary approvals as required by CNS. Engineering.

Procedure 3.7, " Drawing Change Notices." Although this' appeared tot

-

be'atviolation'of 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion V, it appeared to

be'an isolated case.and did not appear to be a safety significant

'

issue. :The subject was discussed during the exit interview, but a:

l i

l-Notice of Violation was not' issued because the criteria of L

Section V.A of the NRC's Enforcement Policy were not met.

.c.

Procedure Control The primary document prescribing the' requirements of 10 CFR 50,

,

Lc Appendix B, Criterion VI, is Plant Services Procedure 1.10,." Document Control," and includes the management controls to assure that procedures and revisions are distributed to the proper locations.

CNS Procedure 0.4, " Preparation, Review, and Approval of Procedures" prescribes the orderly development of procedures including changes, that have a potential impact on design,. Technical Specif1 cations or operations.' In addition, the requisites for final approvals are delineated..

I The focal point for the ' procedure control is the ensite CNS Administrative Support Group and Records Center. This group q

,

utilizes a computerized procedure tracking program.

During the inspection, the. inspector select'ed eight approved procedure change notices identified as having been distributed to the control room, plant engineering, and.the-cognizant surveillance

,]

coordinator. The inspector visited each of the respective procedure

>

custodians and verified that the most recent changes were y;

. contained in the applicable manuals.

d.

Technical Specifications and Final Safety Analysis Report

,

'

~

' Document administrative controls (including changes) for Technical!

Specifications and the Final Safety Analysis Report are essentially

the' responsibility of the General Offices in Columbus, Nebraska.

e

.Therefore, no inspection was conducted in this area.

- - - ___ _ _.---_-_- _-_-__

- _ _ _

,_,..

'

ow

..

.

-

.

a

'7'

-

.

,

' *$ \\; * * *

- -5-

i:

- 3..

Findings Within the scope of this inspection, administrative controls and implementing w

procedures provided an adeouate mechanism for issuing and distributing.

documents important to safety and are in conformance with regulatory requirements..

.

No violations or deviations were identified.

. 4.

Exit Interview An exit interview was cor: ducted.on August 11. 1988, with those personnel denoted in paragraph 1.

The< inspection scope and findings were summarized. No:information was presented to the.NRC inspector that was

- identified by the licensee as proprietary..

'

.,

>

,

1

.,

".

^

-.

1'

l

<

U n

n.._

- _. _ - _ _ _

.m_.-.___ a

i i

'

i.

essicsonMme U.S.NUCLEA3 REGULATORY COMMISSION PamCeAt msPtCtoa maaw est est s,wmaze n,rers.

s C M'

.U ?~

. INSPECTOR'S REPORT g,,,,,

Office of Inspection and Enforcement gggf 845PICT0a6 TRAN$a CN tiCIN5f t VIN 00A 00CKET h0 Septsion LICEN5g atPont Ntzt eN5Pic oaf t yyp NO (Sv PRODUCTitt3 e,tsi 88 0.

SIC MO.

VA.

~

'

Y' d' c

< 'l.

0) R'

8 9 3 O A

b

/

,

M - MODWV g

C O - DELift

'

R - REPLACE l

D T

14

10 Pts /40 0s aesvesTeGAf osurmsPECTON eNSPECTON etaponMED ev ORGAseEAfl0N 00DE OF REGION /MO CONDUCT.

]C1Mtp

[

'.

i F 0en TO

'>'1 - htG"asuAt ospect STAFF p

MO.

DAv VA.

MO DAY vm 2 - Rt510fNT ess5PECTOR REGIDk DfVISeDN BRAteCM Ol8 Ol7 6l9 h

/l / gl%

3 - PteFORMANCE APPRAIS AL TEAM h

[

N N

N St

33

. 34 m-AEGe0NAL ActeDN TVPt OF ACTIVITY CONOUCTED IChace one non amye IChose one ten eneve X

02 - SAFf77

_

08 - MGMT. Vt%87

_

10 - PLANT $1C.

14 - WOulRY

_

t - esmC 90AM get OS - sNCIDtNT 07 - EPECIAL 11 - assytNT.vtR.

15 - mvtSTIGAte0N

'

2 - CEGIOesAL OFFICI LETTen D8 - 5470actWEedT OB-vtNDOR 12 - SMiPutNTitxPORT DE - MGMT. audit 00 - MAT. ACCT.

13-sMponT N

37 3 INFE LIQ @ty'gATg, F'NDmG5 TOTAL NuM'sta ENFORCEMENT CONFERfhCE RtPORT CONT Am 2 790 LETTER o# REPORT TRAN$ MITT AL DATE

,

OF vCLAT40se& AND MELD sedFORMATION A

B C

D DEVIAtCNS

.

asmC FORW est atPOATSINT 1 - CLEAR On atG TOMOFOR LETTem issutD ACTION

-

2 - VIOLATION 3 - Ofv6AT8DN A

B C

D A

B C

D A

S; C D

M0 DAY vn-M0 Day va.

1 - vt$

1 - vis l

N Fi M in nal l

4 - vt0LATION 4 0tVIATON p,g e, f

,

,

t>J s

43 A4 49 to

MODutt IN80*MATON MOOut,macaMATiON MODULE REO Followup g"Q McDutt NUMetR sNSP l

,$,C MODULI NUMetR INSP Og y M00utt af 0 f 0LLowuP gg g t

E_-...

r!_. n! E s

  • !

3o

~

,s i l-

.-!._5_ nI_E: s

_ i, n !-

-

as

.-

-

-

S

_

_

-

.! !si f

!E l ! is E

E i

!!!

E

, i l i s E

!

.

.

_

.

.

e.

.

.

!

E,! l

!a I!!!I _ M i

i e

f i ol7,o,$l a

oicil liii.

iIiiI ei e i i

i i i i a

.

i i

i i i

i li,1 i

3-.

i i

,

i I

y p ucs

'

i.

,,

,,

i liil liil e

c i i i n i

gyt r i,

,,

i

-

liil liil a

=

i n i i i

_

,,

,,

i (.W 3,711eitlG osic /ic,6 e IiiI.

IiiI IiiI

^

,

i

,

i i i i i

I,il 1.,1 ag'

i i

,,

i

,,

,,

i IiiI Ii,I c

c

' g,ggcc i.

..

,

ii i,

,

I,,1 I,il

=

o

,,

,,

,

i,

,,

,

liil liil^

liil.

lii l

^

i,

,,

i i

i is i n i

.

i i

liil ei i i i liil a

-

ii

, i i

1,,1 l..I c

c

..

,,

,

,,

,,

,

I,il 1,,1

=

o

,,

i,

,

,,

,,

,

iiiI*

l.il.

liii ii i.

,

i i

i i i i i Iii1

'

.

i i

I,il li,1 a

-

,,

i,

e

,,

,,

,

liiI liil c

c i,

,,

i ii

,,

,

e conCit StoutNr.E is I

vet Ateos De t.t cA tsoe.

g g g g g l g g l g g g g lg l

o D

g mm

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_.

.

.m 1.

_

_

___

_

-___. - _ -

-

.__

__

_

= * oat moovte=vusca

,p

--

I Ec onama A soc erno rgemisecea :

g3,g,7p 4 gj.{gf-mon u wo.cr ano w

,,

,,,

j
-

vogig,.

a,..

,g;,,

%,

INSPECTOR'S REPORT c.c c c e 2. 9 1

& 9 3 o 4.

c-oc

,

e

-.t.

.

o (Continuation)

Office Of inspection and Enforcement jy

__ e o[

o

<

,

....

WOJTON om og viatOs g nose asp e M c8esmesom W esen e F N 8888 N we hW. a w se neseeas'y se meese &enn smos a y one,oge,g eseg y y,0h

, f d A (LAY f

h M

b j

f

-

-

o

,

W$k rh phff YZ / W G ullLh?/ M d kV 4hMX

$

G V

U

.

,,

,

.

<> smcke 3D

" DAs Clu>w 49h o '

.

/t O

'

'

l V

/

s

.

s

-

&k Q.

O A(_Y-Y &f b

$

bb kJh ( 8

)

.

'*

12 il

-

is

1

18

30 ft

23

G e

N

\\

66h r1

$3

-

.

K 9'

D D

D

--

,

i el g,

.

,

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION l

~