ML20248D620

From kanterella
Revision as of 00:24, 2 February 2021 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
NPDES Noncompliance Notification:On 890921,sulfuric Acid Manually Added to Circulating Water Sys at Excessive Rate. Caused by Plant Acid Addition Sys That Normally Performs Function Being Out of Svc for Maint & Lack of Procedure
ML20248D620
Person / Time
Site: Perry  FirstEnergy icon.png
Issue date: 09/26/1989
From: Kaplan A
CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING CO.
To: Gomes E
OHIO, STATE OF
References
FRN-58FR58804 AE81-1-022, PY-CEI-OEPA-008, NUDOCS 8910040337
Download: ML20248D620 (2)


Text

= , . - - - - - - - - - -

'i O ' 476

.I e

['

l ~THE CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING COMPANY P.O. sox 97 5 PERRY, OHIO 44061 5 TELEPHONE (216) 2!$3737 5 ADoRESS-10 CENTER ROAD

!' FRoM CLEVELAND- 241 1650 Serving The Best Location in the Nation Al Kaplan PERRY NUCLEAR POWER PLANT vet entsoeur NUCLEAR GROUP September 26, 1989 PY-CEI/0 EPA-0087 L Mr. Ermelindo Gomes Environmental Engineer Division of Water Pollution Control Ohio EPA, Northeast District Office 2110 East Aurora Road Twinsburg, Ohio .44087 Re:. 9/21/89 Sulfuric Acid Incident at the Perry Nuclear Power Plant

Dear Mr. Gomes:

This letter provides a follow up to the telephone notification made to the EPA on September 21, 1989, concerning an incident at the Perry Nuclear Power Plant (OEPA Incident Report No. 09433722). The incident occurred when sulfuric acid was manually added to the plant's Circulating Water System (Cooling Tower) at

~

an excessive rate. The acid was added directly from a tank truck to the cooling tower basin. The plant Acid Addition System which normally performs this function was out of service for maintenance.

The direct addition of acid is normally controlled at a flow rate of one (1) gallon per minute (gpm). As a result of this incident three thousand (3000) I ge11ons of 93.4 percent sulfuric acid were added to the basin in approximately a half hour' period (flow rate 1100 gpm). It is also estimated that most of the sulfuric acid was discharged through the Service Water System to Lake Erie (via Circulating Water System blowdown). The quantity released exceeded the l Reportable Quantity (RQ) listed in 40 CFR Part 302 of one thousand (1000)

pounds. It should be noted that this release is considered an " excursion" of an unintentional and temporary nature, pursuant to 40 CFR Part 401.17(a)(2),

and should not be considered a violation of the regulations.

Incident investigation determined that the sulfuric acid was added to the cooling tower basin by plant operators roughly between 6:30 and 7:00 A.M. on 9/21/89. From a continuous pH recorder, it was determined that the pH of the pinnt discharge water at Outfall No. 3IB00016004 fell below the NPDES Permit (OEPA Permit No. 31B00016*CD) limit of 6 S.U. for approximately forty-five (45) minutes, between 7:45 and 8:30 A.M. that morning, reaching a minimum of 2.4 S.U. for about fifteen (15) minutes of that duration. Prior to its release, the sulfuric acid was diluted by water from the Circulating Water, Service Water, and Emergency Service Water Systems. The flow rate of the outfall during the releese was approximately fifty thousand (50,000) gallons  %[y per minute (gpm). The excessive acid addition was later identified by other plant personnel and reported to the control room supervisor at 10:42 A.M..

8910040337 890926 PDR ADDCK 05000440 S PNU ,

' L a w. o .

l Mr. E. Comes September 26, 1989 PY-CEI/0 EPA-0087 L A comprehensive survey of the Lake Erie shoreline was conducted on 9/22/89 at the plant site, and at nearby beaches. No adverse visible effects were observed. In addition, the U.S. Coast Guard, which was assisting a pleasure craft near the plant'a discharge'atructure, reported no abnormal observations in the area, after being contacted.

The cause of this incident was the lack of a procedure that clearly specified organizational interfaces and detailed operating instructions to ensure the activity was performed correctly. In addition, plant personnel performing this activity were not familiar with the flow rate limitations and abnormal system lineup.

As a result of this incident, maintenance on the plants permanently installed Acid Addition System was accelerated, and the system was returned to service.

This ensures a proper flow rate of acid. In addition, applicable plant procedures will be reviewed and revised to ensure proper organizational interfaces and limitations are clearly specified for the manual addition of sulfuric acid to the Circulating Water System. Also, appropriate plant personnel will be counseled on the circumstances surrounding this incident, including the need to ensure that personnel are not aesigned to perform activities without adequate training and procedural direction.

Please contact me if you have any questions.

)

Very truly ours, ,

Al Kaplan '

Vice President Nuclear Group l

AK:nj c cc: Document Control Desk, USNRC Lake County Emergency Planning Committee Attention: Mr. R. Retzler P.O. Box 480 Mentor, Ohio 44061 l

j l