ML20248F325

Forwards Corrected Tables 4,5 & 6 to Testimony of Rl Goble, G Thompson & J Beyea Re Adequacy of Seabrook Plan for Commonwealth of Ma Communities Filed on 890221.Related Correspondence

ML20248F325
Person / Time
Site:	Seabrook
Issue date:	03/31/1989
From:	Traficonte J MASSACHUSETTS, COMMONWEALTH OF
To:	Smith I Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
References
CON-#289-8399 OL, NUDOCS 8904130022
Download: ML20248F325 (4)

Text

. b THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS G p DEPARTMENT OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

]

k j .

JOHN W. McCORMACK STATE OFFICE BUILdihbf k;f 3 e- ONE ASHBURTON PLACE. BOSTON 02108-1698

%, i

'89 APR -5 P1 :37 JAMES M, SHANNON ATTOANEY GENERAL k%f,Ddflg$gpNggg '

l March 31, 0 Y l $ g' '

Ivan Smith, Chairman Atomic Safety & Licensing Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commi.ssion ,

East West Towers Building 4350 East West. Highway Bethesda, MD 20814 RE: In The Matter of Public Service Company of New Hampshire , et al. (Seabrook Station, Units 1 and 2), Docket Nos 50-443-444-OL

Dear Administrative Judges:

Enclosed please find the corrected Table 4, Table 5, and Table 6 to Testimony of Dr. Gordon Thompson, Dr. Robert L.

Goble, and Dr. Jan Beyea on Behalf of the Attorney General For the Commonwealth of Massachusetts on Contentions Regarding the Adequacy of the SPMC, which was filed with this Court on February 21, 1989. Please replace the previously filed tables with the corrected tables provided.

Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Very truly yours,

{' l ohn Traficonte hief, Nuclear Safety Unit epartment of the Attorney General (617) 727-2200 JT/tm Enclosure cc: Seabrook Off-site Service List 1

8904130022 090331 )

PDR ADOCKOS00g3

'D 5 0 3

~e

~

.- TABLE 4

. .q '. RELATIVE EXPOSURE FOR EACH STRATEGY 50th PERCENTILE 90th PERCENTILE.

STRATEGY PERSON PERSON (A) Evacuation Strategies El. Unplanned Evacuation 1.0 1.22-E2. SPMC Evacuation 0.94 1.16 E3. Generic Evacuation 0 0.35 E4. Generic Evacuation 0.48 0.74 With Difficulties (B) Sheltering Strategies S1. - Ad Hoc Shelter 1.02 1.51-S2. Shelter Equivalent to 0.69 0.84 Wood Frame Buildings i Without Basements S3. Shelter Equivalent to 0.47 0.63 Wood Frame Buildings With Basements S4. Good Shelter 0.36 0.51 NOTES:

1. The entry for the 50th percentile person for the " Unplanned Evacuation" strategy is arbitrarily set at unity.

2. Here, " exposure" is physically equivalent to red marrow dose.

l

^'s us J TABLE 5 RELATIVE PROBABILITY OF EARLY DEATH FOR EACH STRATEGY-l 50th PERCENTILE 90th PERCENTILE I STRATEGY -PERSON PERSON (A) Evacuation Strategies El.-Unplanned Evacuation 1.0 4.9 l E2. SPMC Evacuation 0.85 2.6 E3. Generic Evacuation 0 0.0006-E4. Generic. Evacuation 0.005 0.32 With Difficulties (B) Sheltering Strategies S1. Ad Hoc Shelter 1.5 55 S2. Shelter Equivalent to 0.07 0.78 Wood Frame Buildings Without Basements S3'. Shelter Equivalent to- 0 0.03 Wood Frame Buildings With Basements S4. Good Shelter 0 0.006 NOTE:

The entry for the 50th percentile person for the " Unplanned Evacuation" strategy is arbitrarily set at unity, i

1 i

1 TABLE 6 i

RELATIVE PROBABILITY OF '

PRODROMAL VOMITING FOR EACH STRATEGY l 50th PERCENTILE 90th PERCENTILE STRATEGY PERSON PERSON (A) Evacuation Strategies El. Unplanned Evacuation 1.0 2.6 E2. SPMC Evacuation 0.77 2.2 E3. Generic Evacuation 0 0.02 E4. Generic Evacuation 0.07 0.3 With Difficulties (B) Sheltering Strategies S1. Ad Hoc Shelter 1.9 2.9 S2. Shelter Equivalent to 0.73 1.63 Wood Frame Buildings Without Basements S3. Shelter Equivalent to 0.22 0.60 Wood Frame Buildings With Basements S4. Good Shelter 0.11 0.36 NOTE:

The entry for the 50th percentile person for the " Unplanned Evacuation" strategy is arbitrarily set at unity.

l l _