ML20237A368

From kanterella
Revision as of 20:29, 25 January 2021 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Insp Repts 50-413/87-36 & 50-414/87-36 on 871026- 1125.Criteria for Categorization of licensee-identified Violations Met So Apparent Violation Not Cited
ML20237A368
Person / Time
Site: Catawba  Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 12/10/1987
From: Brownlee V
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To: Tucker H
DUKE POWER CO.
Shared Package
ML20237A370 List:
References
NUDOCS 8712140428
Download: ML20237A368 (2)


See also: IR 05000413/1987036

Text

_

,

'

f CW(

01937 '

DEC l

l

Docket Nos. 50-413, 50-414 j

License Nos. NPF-35, NPF-52 l

Duke Power Company

ATTN: Mr. H. B. Tucker, Vice President

Nuclear Production Department

422 South Church Street l

Charlotte, NC 2824%

Gentlemen:

SUBJECT: NRC INSPECTION REPORT NOS. 50-413/87-36 AND 50-414/87-36

This refers to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) inspection conducted by

P. K. Van Doorn and M. S. Lesser on October 26 - November 25, 1987. The

inspection included a review of activities authorized for your Catawba

facility. At the conclusion of the inspection, the findings were discussed

with those members of your staff identified in the enclosed inspection report.

Areas examined during the inspection are identified in the report. Within

these areas, the inspection consisted of selective examinations of procedures

and representative records, interviews with personnel, and observation of

activities in progress.

The inspection findings indicate that certain activities appeared to violate

NRC requirements. However, because all of the criteria for categorization of

licensee-identified violations were met, the violation is not being cited.

The details pertaining to the licensee-identified violation are described in

the enclosed Inspection Report.

Your attention is invited to unresolved items identified in the inspection

report. These matters will be pursued during future inspections.

In accordance with Section 2.790 of the NRC'S " Rules of Practice," Part 2, '

Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, a copy of this letter and its enclosure

will be placed in the NRC'S Public Document Room.

Should you have at.y questions concerning this letter, please contact us.

'

Sincerely,

ORIGINAL SIWD my

VIRGIL L izwn;jg

Virgil L. Brownlee, Chief

l

Reactur Projects Branch 3

Division of Reactor Projects

Enclosure: (See page 2)

8712140429 97;ggo

PDR ADOCK 05000413

G PDR 1

1 5

2""i

_ _ _ - - _ _ - - - - - --- - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - . - - - - - - .- --- - - --

- - - - _ _ . - _ . - _ _ . - ,

.

. ,.

Duke Power Company 2 DEC 101987

Enclosure:

NRC Inspection Report

cc w/ enc 1:

J. W. Hampton, Station Manager

Senior Resident Inspector - McGuire

bec w/ encl:

.K.-N. Jabbour, NRR

NRC' Resident Inspector.

DRS Technical Assistant

Document Control Desk

State of South Carolina

RII. R i

rNIk DRBonser:er T Peebles

i

j

12/2'/87 12/f/87

!

t

l

_ _ _ _ _ - - - - _ _ . . - - - - - - - _ - - - - - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - - - -- - - - - - - -