ML20207S593

From kanterella
Revision as of 22:09, 11 January 2021 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Informs That SER & NEPA-related Documents Have Not Been Produced Re Plant Spent Fuel Pool Expansion Request. Alternative Schedule for Filing Contentions Recommended Due to Unavailability of Documents Prior to 870330 Deadline
ML20207S593
Person / Time
Site: Vermont Yankee File:NorthStar Vermont Yankee icon.png
Issue date: 03/16/1987
From: Weiss E
HARMON & WEISS, NEW ENGLAND COALITION ON NUCLEAR POLLUTION
To: Bechhoefer C, Bright G, Carpenter J
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
References
CON-#187-2818 OLA, NUDOCS 8703200074
Download: ML20207S593 (2)


Text

- .

o 2 Ef/

00CKETED UshRC HARMON & WEISS aooi S STREET. N.w. , g p j ,17 SUITE 430 WASHINGTON, D.C. nocoo-nes GAIL p.4cGRCCVY HARMON yfEjC[ CE bb~# TCLEPHONC "Q.,2o,3 3,.3 30o ELLYN R. weiss 00CKETmG ). 5E DIANE CURRAN BRANCH DEAN R. TOUSLEY ANDREA C. FERSTER Ma rch 16,1987 1

Charles Bechhoefer, Ch airma n Glenn O. Bright Dr. James H. Ca rpen ter U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C . 20555

! RE:

M Vermont Yankee, Docket No. 5 0-271'( Amendment to Facility Operating License)

Cear Mr. Chairman and Members of the Board, I am writing to inform you that neither the Safety Evalua-r mion Report nor any NEPA - related documents have yet been pro-duced for the Vermont Yankee spent fuel pool expansion request.

I am informed by the Staf f that neither will be issued prior to P.he March 30, 1987, deadline for the filing of contentions.

While NECNP can file some contentions, they will necessarily be preliminary and are sure to be changed, if not supplanted, after the staf f's basic review documents are produced. Since this case is not currently in a posture to proceed to hearing, we ask that the Board consider whether it is an efficient use of the time and resources of all concerned to begin a process that will predictably lead to motions to amend, oppositions, replies, and numerous unnecessary and time-consuming procedural disputes. In addition, intervenors may even be called upon to meet the burden for " late-filed" contentions, which is both unfair and inap-propriate under these circumstances and would compel the Board to rule contention-by-contention as to whether the standards of 10 C . F. R . 2. 714 ( a ) were met, fh3200074 0 6 ADOCK o Ph

$ 63

1 . e 3

.g. e- s -

HARMON & WEISS .-

l I'

Charles Bechhoefer, Ch air man- ,

-s March 16, 1987 Page 2 NECNP suggests an alternative schedulti under which conten-tions would be due 21 days af ter receipt of the staff's review ,

documents. Either the undersigned or Diane Curran ar,e available to discuss this at your convenience.

very truly yours, -

l) , jY JgY f '~

L ll s Ellyn/ R. Weiss Harmon & Weiss =-

2001 S Street, N.W.

Suite 4 30 Washington, D. C. 20009 i Counsel for t.'ECNP

. f-cc: George Dean Ann Hodgdon John A. Ritscher, Es q . ,

Docketing & Service Daniel J. Mullett

'N t

e.

b  %. ~%

8 l

-. l

=4

,s,-._,-,.,,,-,.- - - - . , , . _

4