ML20137G536
| ML20137G536 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Comanche Peak  |
| Issue date: | 11/21/1985 |
| From: | Landers D TELEDYNE ENGINEERING SERVICES |
| To: | Noonan V NRC - COMANCHE PEAK PROJECT (TECHNICAL REVIEW TEAM) |
| References | |
| 6410-20, NUDOCS 8601210075 | |
| Download: ML20137G536 (25) | |
Text
+
WTELEDYNE ENGNEERING SERVK' ES 130 SECOND AVENUE WALTH AM, M ASSACHUSETTS 02254 (6t A 890-3350 TWX1710) 324-7508 November 21, 1985 6410-20 Mr. Vince Noonan, Project Director Comanche Peak Project U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Division of Licensing Mail Stop P-234 Washington, D. C. 20555
Dear Mr. Noonan:
Attached are preliminary Trip Reports prepared by TES staff personnel.
Both reports are associated with cable tray activities being reviewed by the staff.
If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me.
Very truly yours, TELEDYNE ENGINEERING SERVICES M
Donald F. Landers Executive Vice President DFL/lh Attachments cc: L.Shao(USNRC)
C. Trammell (USNRC)
C. Poslusny (USRNC)
D. Jeng (USNRC) 6410 File (TES)
A eso221oors assies f ADOCK 05000445 PDR ENGINEERS AND METALLURGISTS
w
.c .
'. 'seTELEDYNE ENGINEERING SERVCES Trip Report No. 2172 Meeting with EBASCO November 8, 1985 The purpose of this meeting was to discuss questions about EBASCO pro-cedures which have been reviewed. The meeting started at 9:30. Victor Ferrarini, Romuald E. Lipinski, Paul Bezler and I were there representing the NRC. Rene 5. Ale <andru, Joe Padalino, Ray Sullivan, Frank Hettinger, and Cy Chiou were representing EBASCO.
As a result of our last meeting on October 25, 1985, volume 1 of the cable tray calculations have been delivered to Harry Harrison, who has de-1ivered them to Dave Jeng. The volume 1 calculations include standard cal-culations and studies but does not include the 1.25 MRM study. This will follow shortly. Also sent with volume 1 were three examples of red-line drawing and the associated as-built calculations. Minutes of the October 25 meeting have been sent to Larry Shoa.
No final decisicr. has been made yet to make EBASCO designer of record for cable trays or conduit. EBASCO's responsibilities for the CTCS effort were clarified. EBASCO was responsible for the Unit 2 cable tray walkdown using TUCG0 procedures but not Unit 1. They were not responsible for the walkdowns of the conduit systems. EBASCO is responsible for design verification of cable tray supports in Units 1 and 2, except for the safe-guard buildin;, and for the conduit supports in Unit 2 but not Unit 1.
IMPELL is now responsible for the design verification of the 1502 supports in the safeguard building in Unit 1.
The following procedurcs were received from EBASCO and discussed.
Questions generated prior to this meeting was based on the previous revi-sion.
- 1. GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR CABLE TRAY HANGER ANALYSIS FOR COMANCHE PEAK STEAM ELECTRICAL STATION NO. 2 REV 1
- 2. SAG-CP3, REV 3, SEISMIC DESIGN CRITERIA FOR CABLE TRAY HANGERS FOR COMANCHE PEAK STEAM ELECTRICAL STATION N0. 2
- 3. SAG-CP2, REV 3, DESIGN AND ANALYSIS PROCEDURE OF SEISMIC CATEGORY I ELECTRICAL CONDUIT SYSTEM The following items were discussed.
- 1. GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR CABLE TRAY HANGER ANALYSIS FOR COMANCHE PEAK STEAM ELECTRICAL STATION NO. 2, REV 1
- f
.J .
Trip Report No. 2172 WTri FrVNE November 8, 1985 ENGINEERING SERVICES Page 2
- 1) Page 24 Attachment B2: Longitudinal horizontal seismic load is equal to Pdl x ghl x MRM. But Pdi = tray weight down for vertical load. This is not the same load that should be used for longitudinal loads.
EBASCO response: This was correct in revision 1.
- 2) Page 10 Section III.D.2: The wording does not agree with the picture. Wording talks about attachment welded to em-bedded plate or baseplate and title and picture refers to two bolted connection.
EBASCO response: This will be clarified in the next revi-sion.
- 3) Pages 23-25: What is the basis of these formulas for the loads applied to the cable tray hangers?
EBASCO response: Justification is in the volume 1 calcula-tions.
- 4) How is the longitudinal load imposed on transverse supports located just around an elbow being considered?
EBASCO response: Tests will be conducted to show that this load is negligible.
- 2. SAG-CP3, REV 3, SEISMIC DESIGN CRITERIA FOR CABLE TRAY HANGERS FOR COMANCHE PEAK STEAM ELECTRICAL STATION NO. 2
- 1) Page 2 Section III.1: Span lengths given are confusing.
Allowable tolerance and maximum tray span length give a longer possible length than in item c.
EBASCO response: Allowable tolerance is for the cable tray hanger. Span length in item c to be used when as-built is not available should be 8'-G" for Unit 2 and 9'-0" for Unit
- 1. This will be changed in the next revision.
- 3. SAG-CP2, REV 3, DESIGN AND ANALYSIS PROCEDURE OF SEISMIC CATEGORY I ELECTRICAL CONDUIT SYSTEM
- 1) Page 2: What is meant by first paragraph?
EBASCO response: This section has been deleted in revision 3.
O. .
Trip R: port ib. 2172 "RTpt Frh'NE November 8, 1985 Page 3 ENGINEERING SERVICES
- 2) Page 5: Clamp allowables in Table 1 are for Unistrut clamps on Unistrut. Is is applicable to clamps used on structural s teel ? For clamps above 2" slip through test were linear threugh 800-900 pounds. Therefore the allowable used for 3" clamps will be in the non-linear range causing large deflec-tions. Is this acceptable and what effect does it have on the system frequency?
EBASCO response: When the test results are finalized from CC&L these allowables will be used and all calculations re-checked.
- 3) Page 6: What procedure will be used for baseplate verifica-tion?
EBASCO response: EBASCO in-house program EMBEDP2616 with ANSYS or STRUDL program as stated in Section 7.0.c of this procedure.
- 4) Pages 10-11: Justify DAF of 1.5,1.25, and 1.0.
EBASCO res ponse: There will be a calculation package to back this up.
- 5) Page 14 Table 3: The National Electric Code uses 40 percent maximum conduit fill weight for conduit weights. These weights are higher than the weights in Table 3. Justify this difference.
EBASCO response: They will track down the backup in forma-tion for the conduit weights.
- 6) Appendix 2 Page 8 Gibbs and Hill Specification No. 2323-SS-30 Design Criteria for Hilti Kwik and Super Kwik-Bolts:
What is the basis of the 4/3 factor in the interaction formula ?
EBASCO response: Discussion on this matter was deffered to a later date.
Also received at the close of the neeting but not discussed is pro-cedure TNE-AB-CS-1 REVISION 1, formally CP-EI-4.0-0-75, AS-BUILT PROCEDURE CABLE TRAY HANGER DESIGN ADEQUACY VERIFICATION.
? -
./j\ < ,
A'i / -< f_ ,
Eric A. Solla EAS/khc cc: JAF, DFL, WJC
W TrlIT-T(NE ENGINEERING SERVICES TRIP REPORT NO. 2175 -- ---
PROJECT 6410T VISIT OF R. R. B0ENTGEN AND E. A. SOLLA TO CORPORATE CONSULTING AND DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LTD.
APEX, NORTH CAROLINA TO OBSERVE CONDUIT CLAMP TESTING 12-14 NOVEMBER 1985 12 Nov 85 Air travel to Raleigh, N.C.; drive to Ramada Inn, Apex.
(Evening) 13 Nov 85 Orove approximately eight miles to CCL (Corporate Consulting and Development Company, Ltd.) meeting with NRC, CCL, Gibbs and Hill, Comanche Peak (TUGCo) and EAS personnel (see attached).
Briefing given by CCL and project people on testing: Three each of static load tests will be conducted in each of three directions on three sizes of conduit for Nelson studs, Hilti anchors and Unistrut bolts for various filler plate and bolt spacings. Based on a review of these load-deflection data, target load values will be selected for use in the cyclic tests in which three (different) simultaneous, independent orthogonal loads will be applied. (See attached flowchart.) Received revised test procedures for these tests (Rev. 3 dated November 8, 1985) and also for the nonsafety-related two-inch and smaller Train C conduit tests (Rev. 2 dated October 17, 1985) being conducted by CCL. TUGCo expressed the opinion that, based on the test outcomes, the program would probably be expanded to include intermediate sizes not presently covered.
Also witnessed static and cyclic tests (see attached list) for setup and procedures. The number of cyclic load applications represent three times the number of five OBE and one SSE events. For the Hilti concrete expansion anchors, a set of long-term (about one month) tests were being conducted to determine the amount of preload loss. In general, the tests appear to be well planned, efficiently conducted with good documentation and QA-type coverage. Specifically:
All instrumentation (load cells, displacement transducers) for the static and cyclic tests had current calibration labels; the procedures for the static and cyclic tests observed were well prescribed, documented and followed; cnd execution of required operations was confirmed by operator and test monitor initials (see attachments). Specific checks were made in areas of pos-sible test deficiencies (e.g., desired load (s) not being reached in cyclic tests due to excessive demands on stroke) to confirm proper operation.
Some unresolved concerns were noted by the NRC review team.
Specifically:
- 1. Unistrut P1000 channels are used in the testing whereas some P5000 channels are used in the plant. The P5000 type
Trip Rep;rt No. 2175 SPTri mVNE ENGINEERING SERVICES has longer side legs and therefore may be less stiff in supporting nuos against ultimate load application, pos-sibly leading to nonconservative results. This should be justified.
- 2. Nuts of Superstrut manufacture may have been allowed to be used with Unistrut channels. The Superstrut capacity is less than those of the tested Unistrut nuts. The project must verify that Superstrut nuts have not been substituted or that they are included in the tests.
- 3. Drilling of the holes in concrete for the Hilti anchors was done using a guiding fixture for the test-specimen preparations, whereas site procedures allowed up to six-degrees-of-angularity error from perpendicular. A bending stress or yielding may thus be induced in field installa-tion. The drilling procedure for the testing should be justified, or the influence, if any, of nonperpendic-ularity should be determined by testing.
- 4. Testing of the strut channels has been performed on site, considering clamps as strong. Current testing assumes channels as strong (i.e., continuous supporting founda-tions). A combination of the lowest failure loads from these two test series may not conservatively represent the ultimate load capacity of the combination.
Upon questioning on the restraint of the concrete cone failure mode offered by the test fixture for Hilti static tests, the CCL personnel voluntarily modified the fixture. This concern is thus moot.
The report on the conduit support testing is due out of Gibbs and Hill on 22 November. TUGCo will then require an additional week or two for review.
14 Nov 85 Witnessed additional cyclic tests, including one deflection-limited f ailure to reach one set of (813) load cycles. The test was redone with a revised (lower) target load in the failed axial direction and passed with the full three times load-application cycles (2439). The factor on static ultimate was raised from three to four for the axial direction. EAS and VPF prepared procedures for cable tray support walkdowns. In PM, EAS to Washington, D.C., for schedule discussions; RRB to Boston.
R2B A R. R. Boentgen [/
E. A. Solla RRB:jej Attachments 1 - Trip Report File 1 - DFL 1 - Project 6410 File (WJC) 1 - JAF t
MEETING WITH CCL -
- NOVEMBER 13, 1985 Eric Solla TES/NRC Rudy Boeutgen TES/NRC Keith McPherson CCL Gary Hughes CCL Jeff Bond CCL Steve McBee TUGC0 Victor P. Ferrarini EAS/NRC-TRT Romuald E. Lipinski NRC/TRT me e
O @
6
i
- o m -
2 -
5 _8 Safety Related Conduit Supports Non Safety Related CJamp Test Program C onduiLSupports
- o. o 2 09 De ternii ne Perform Static hI
$ Ek Anchor 301t 1.oad lests I!elaxation fl' l" D
- Perfon.: Values 5 $9 Static g 33 o c_
Load TesLs
- a. o=
E bA Submit ; y y Results & %
- r-Deternine 5 4 Sti ffness P " n? ; ?;;2 =o *
- = c -
Detennine Perfonn G Eg Ta rget Cyclic G
- llo;at.le Load t ca:t Tes:s CCL TEST PROGRAMS
-OVERVIEW-Con fi ns Allouable Clan;p loads O O O 55' o
Docuren t Allowable Loads and Stiffness
m, 1,.-<
If' b "
h Corporate Consulting
%23L. & Development Company. Ltd.
,,,,,,,, f c, {
g gj //_///,9g W62 8800 CHECKEDBY 8 MA D ATE //~ / ~
PO. Box 12728
- Flesearch Triarigte Park, NC 27709 ~/
SCALE TEST M8- -
(p,.iti3-as) AILURE MODE UL-IMATE 10AD
~ 5- 5 -o4- E-ol HILTI FAILUR6i H 908 Ibs.
S-5-03-2-03 $$'YA$ $ 5%I?GN$ h 4GOG L.,
. STATIC, 5 o3-2-01 57dp FAnuRE i 8524 L, s-s x-o4 'A'"%
5 03 - E-0 2
'i'"Iff"%p STUD FArcuRE 370i 8 (o O 4 la.
ffs, 4Q 5 o* -Y-o A STUD FAIL UAE l h?' (,C)BO llas.
. . . 5- 5 ' 03- E 03 STUD FA1 LURE I f 8%$ ll3g, 3 ~ 3 *'/ O o? HuLTI FAIL uRe. .9978 _ Iln..
(li- 14 -sd S 04- 3-01 HILTI FAILURE I4306 I6, to TARG6T JOAD.5 m Ax1AL I sJEMcAL. I LATCPgt.
~
C-5-of or Passed (2439 c3ds) ISM d 4067// /797 =/-
'. C o I- o 2 PASSED (2A3c)cyb sh ISU) ADS]Il f7f7;'l~~
.C'1'C.LIC '
(iv+v) C-s- o3 -o i "Yll"?f" 'Y"' cloy
- 1sa
- 2i ai "-
(ien-is) c-s-o2-oia %::h"lf,1%Cbe 67e' 7ss' ziqi" fii-~ .u) c-s- o, .o a m w o u u < m a .s og -,s g.a ci.u a
. A 03 CLAMP BocT O//-2o) A 0(o3 /hs, .
FAnuras A- U- of CLAMP FAILDRE S')8 /. /$5, TM C. A 47- oz " 'C l. A M P, FAILURE I d 86 /las, D- M-en) A o3 C L AM'P FAILURE 4093 lb3, 4
v,, . -
STATIC TEST SAMPLE MDNITOR LOG Client: Texas Utilities Generating Company Test Sample Number: S-E-o+- E- o p CCL Project Number: 1903.07 Test Date: ll-rs-se Test Procedure Number: 1903.07 TASK DESCRIPTION TEST (STATIC TEST BED) TECH MDN
- 1) Assemble test sample per appropriate assembly drawing. /
Mark each part with the test sample number. Note any part discrepancies or changes on assembly dwg's. ,'
EAR _
/
- 2) Torque boltr to required value. Record the dimensions required on sheet 2 of assembly drawing. /
EAS .
/
- 3) Install appropriate load cell and record CCL number and calibration due date on this form. Record signal conditioner number and calibration date. /
EM6
/ j ,
- 4) Install LVDT(s) as follows as appropriate: ,/ ,
/ / ,
(a) Axial direction - one between conduit and clamp & j/ /
one between clamp and test plate
) Laterial direction - one between clamp and
/
test plate LVDT(s) should be parallel to load axis within -25*.
LVDT core should be as close as practical to center of LVDT after installation. .
EM ' ,/ :
- 5) Record dimensional location and CCL number of LVDT(s) j/ / ,
on sheet 2 of the assembly drawing.
EAp l//
- 6) Record LVDT CCL number (s) on this form along with / '/ '
calibration due date. Record LVDT signal conditioner CCL number (s) on this form along with calibration / -
due date.
fab
/
/ -
This form was:
Prepared By: Y ^ Date Approved By: Date J f
t
- Page 2 of 5 STATIC TEST SAMPLE MONITOR LOG Client: Texas Utilities Generating Company Test Sample Number: %-s-e4 g-of CCL Project Number: 1903.07 Test Date: ll-13 e Test Procedure Number: 1903.07 TASK DESCRIPTION TEST I (STATIC TEST BED) TECH MON
- 7) Assure that hydraulic system is off and that no significant load is applied to test sample.
Electrically zero the load cell signal conditioner /
within 13 counts. Adjust the span to give the reading /
.['
required for the load cell used. Readjust zero if necessary and recheck span.
- 8) Record the span reading for,the load cell below:
Indicated Span Reading #7700 Readjust zero if necessary within 83 counts. j EMS /
- 9) Assure that LVDT core is approximately centered in LVDT body. Electrically zero the signal conditioner / /
within 13 counts. Adjust the span to give the required reading for the LVDT used. Readjust zero if necessary and recheck span.
HMIb - /
- 10) Record the span reading for the LV0T /
LVDT CCL No. so75 Span Reading t1.443 LVDT CCL No. M/4 Span Reading su
/ EA6 .
/
- 11) Verify that test sample is assembled per appropriate drawing. Verify that bolts are properly torqued.
Verify that assembly drawing information is r~nlete.
EM3
- 12) Verify that instrumentation data is recorded and instrumentation is in calibration. Verify span readings for each instrument. 1
. E M ')
- 13) Test monitor approval to proceed with test. g This Form was:
Oate 9
c ,-
' Page 3 of 5 STATIC TEST SAMPLE MONITOR LOG Client: Texas Utilities Generating Company Test Sample Number: 5 c4- E-o; CCL Project Number: 1903.07 Test Date: ll-Is-ss- Test Procedure Number: 1903.07 TASK DESCRIPTION TEST (STATIC TEST BED) TECH MON
- 14) Record load cell and LVDT(s) post-test zero and span settings below:
Load Cell No. foo r, Zero t Oo3f Span 9 n 7 3s LVDT No. (1) fo 75 Zero -ooo3 Span ,.f.Sy3 LVDT No. (2) g/n Zero u/g Span N/g This form was:
Prepared ty:
7 # Date 9 C
,pp,_ d ,,. cam, oate_ p/a e
e
' Page 4 of 5
- STATIC TEST SAMPLE MDNITOR LOG Client: Texas Utilities Generating Company Test Sample Number: s-s-es/ g.of CCL Project Number: 1903.07 Test Date: ll-l3-es , Test Procedure Number: 1903.07 Instrument Log ACR0 System Module Channel Cal Number Number Description MFG Range CCL No. Due h
2 Load Cell No. 1
...................... uH.4.. . M h i 2 % ... J:L M G.
g g Load Cell Indicator o4y7Atou,e 20 K ,
cou =r
, og fA(O4 u p-E Y LVDT No. 1 SehdrWI
...... 2 . 0. . .I .#. .JD.TS. . . .
LVDT Indicator No. 1 FM S- p F#f7Assic covr
, p g, y ,,
"M "M LVDT No. 2
. . $f. . . .0f... ....hld.... .. .V})1. .
,p 4 LVDT Indicator No. 2 p y
~~~ ~-~-
Load Cell Shunt Resistor folk _ $*
- lob 9 See ICJL
... ... . ....... . . ............. ./.'2. . . .. . .. ... ....... .. ...
vp v4 ACR0 P.S.
.f. .f.,. . . . % se/v /4 ,
.gg. . .
dce... .+3.g. ..
pg.p. 3 l =hn' ?
Prepared By: O /> B Date: // /3 .fr Approved Cy: /N Date: ll- #3 83 i This fonn was:
Prepared By: ,__,[ -
f Da te ,_f _ _7 _J [
Approved By: _ Date k,_ 'f 0
/_ :
e
' Page 5 of 5 STATIC TEST SAMPLE MONITOR LOG Client: Texas Utilities Generating Company Test Sample Number: S - C-o4- 2-of CCL Project Number: 1903.07 Test Date: ll-#3 - s e Test Procedure Number: 1903.07 TASK DESCRIPTION TEST (DATA ACQUISITION ROOM) TECH MON
^
- 15) Verify that data file has correct name for the sample being tested. @O h
- 16) Modify Labtech setup menus as required for the sample //
being tested. CPE
- 17) If any transducer and/or signal conditioner has been changed since the previous test, enter details on Master Test Monitor Log. Scale factors should be Opf) -
recalculated for any channels that have been changed.
If " Calibrate" program is used enter S/N.
- 18) Verify that Labtech scale factors are appropriate for the transducers being used. Verify that test sample cps J is properly identified in the Labtech display menu.
- 19) Place identification card adjacent to test sample and
@6 photograph over all setup.
- 20) Test monitor approval to proceed and conduct test to failure per CCL Test Procedure 1903.07 g g (latest revision).
- 21) Place identification card adjacent to test sample and g photograph failure mode as required.
- 22) Verify that photographs and post test instrument l
readings have been taken. ceS p.
- 23) Log test samle as being completed on Master Test Og Monitor Log. yb3
! This Fonn was:
_ _ _ . - _ _ _ _ __ Ap #
l,'- .
l
- Page 1 of 5 TEST MONITOR LOG ,
. " TRAIN C CONDUIT SUPPORTS" l
l Client: Texas Utilities Generating Company Test Sample Number: A _n-o7 CCL Project Number: 1903.11 Test Date- "//-12*GJ~
" ~ " Dest Procedure Number: 1903.03-01, Rev. 2 1, 1 J t TASK DESCRIPTION I l TEST (STATIC TEST BED)
TECH I MON 1 1
- 1) Assemble test sample per appropriate sketch in test procedure 1903.03-01. Rev. 2. Mark the. assembly with I
the test sample number. Note any part discrepancies orl I
or changes on the sketch.
/l I
I g F K. l l
- 2) Torque all bolts to required values. I l 1
'O l
- 3) Install appropriate load cell and record CCL number and calibration due date on this form. Record signal I conditioner number and calibration date.
e:. c p:. i f I ,
- 4) Install LVDT(s) as appropriate to detemine deflection I f I
resulting from applied load. I NOTE: l LVDT(s) should be parallel to load axis within =tS*.
LVDT core should be as close as practical to center of I; I
/J I
LVDT af ter installation.
l l
gex VI
\
- 5) Record dimensional location and CCL number of LVDT(s) on the test item sketch. /l L
I
- 6) Record LVDT CCL number (s) on this fom along with calibration due date. Record LVDT signal conditioner I
CCL number (s) on this form along with calibration due date.
u, A Da te s___ go.is .pN"'
Fom Prepared By: '
Fom Approved Dy: ( I?b Date: A 4 9 /. I
/
I
t . . .
Page 2 of 5 l
TEST MONITOR LOG
" TRAIN C CONDUIT SUPPORTS" Texas Utilities Generating Company Client:
Test Sample Number: A- 33-o 5 CCL Project Number: 1903.11 l Test Date: n- nl:es'##'iest ll m Procedure Number: 1903.03-01, Rev. 2 I
I I I TASK DESCRIPTION l TEST l (STATIC TEST BED) l TECH l MON l l I l
- 7) Assure that hydraulic system is off and that no significant load is applied to test sample. ~ V I l Electrically zero the load cell signal conditioner l I l within 13 counts. Adjust the span to give the reading l l l required for the load cell used. Readjust zero if I l
necessary and recheck span. l I
- 8) Record the span reading for the load cell below: l l l l l Indicated Span Reading a 6,S oy l l Readjust zero if necessary within 23 counts. I i l &nx. V / l
- 9) Assure that LVDT core is approximately centered in if l LVDT body. Electrically zero the signal conditioner within 13 counts. Adjust the span to give the '
i
! required reading for the LVDT used. Readjust zero if l necessary and recheck span.
l
- 10) Record the span reading for the LVDT(s) cfc //
l LVDT CCL No. / o "7 [ Span Reading + /.St/3 I I
I LVDT CCL No. u,/u Span Reading N// l 1 i l l /l
- 11) Verify that test sample is assembled per the /(( h 1
! appropriate sketch. Verify that bolts are properly I torqued. .
i I
Form Prepared Dy: N ,
bb Date: i o t s . es'""
Form Approved By: % Da te: /O- 49./J "
e l ;
- Page 3 of 5 TEST MONITOR LOG
" TRAIN C CONDUIT SUPPORT" .
^
Client: Texas Utilities Generating Company Test Sample Number: 4-33-o3 CCL Project Number: 1903.11 Il~/3 - has c c/C- Test Procedure Number: 1903.03-01, Rev. 2 Test Date: ;l lL6s l
TASK DESCRIPTION TEST I (STATIC TEST BED) l TECH MON I
'l l l I
l C. GK. I I 12) Verify that instrumentation data is recorded and instrumentation is in calibration. Verify span ' '
l I readings for each instrument. i I l
- 13) Test monitor approval to proceed with test. g I
cdX._I '
I
- 14) Record load cell and LVDT(s) post-test zero and span I
[Fh !
1
-settings below: 1 ,
l Load Cell No. r)oJ4 Zero Joe:>f SSpan /-6#3t/ l l 1
l 1
LVDT No. (1) / o ? (Zero J - o of"/ Span /_ /.WS I l l !
LVDT No. (2) u/s Zero A/h Span A,/a l l I
l l ,
e Form Prepared By: m ,} Q 4 Date go.79 g --
Form Approved By:
~
Date:fa 4f ]
(/
1 l
Page 4 of 5 !
TEST MONITOR LOG
" TRAIN C CONDUIT SUPPORTS" Client: Texas Utilities Generating Company Test Sample Number: A-3'5-o3 CCL Project Number: 1903.11 13 Test Date: aTl_%-85 Test Procedure Number: 1903.03 01, Rev. 2 Instrument Log 1 l l
ACR0 System l I l I I l I I I Modulei Channell l l l l Cal . Cal l l Numberl Number l Description MFG l Range l CCL No. I Due l Factor l l l l l l l l l l
o_iog f2ca.s2.s l 7 / Load Cell No. 1 le b g kQ34 ll'M-g61 m/, !
, __....., _______. __________ __________l ____._,_____._l____. ___l...__l l y- / Load Cell Indicator I ,,,
- ~' I j or,9 [
f ,,
( I LVDT No. 1 bere.b' 0- I / 07.5, P:.,ugkWcoreos-I !
S-~ i V/n 1 ....... ..__/___.l__...__.____._-___.__ ____._l--_____ .....____ _____
- ' ' I
$- l 9
I LVDTIndicatorNo.IIDg,d"~"f l l co-- /06 [1 "W l
\ l i t i l l
l
...___..l.._g l
I LVDT No. 2 N// ,
h/#
- //
.__._____l_
AM' I
4 I g l LVDT Indicator No. 21 gjg l y/g ph l g/f d l
l 1 i l l l Load Cell Shunt ! .
^
I M I I
N/A I Resistor j gf ry I
N/A ACR0 CPU 1 ACR0 N/A 3016 I N/A N/A N/A 1___....l ____..__, __..__._____..____ ... ___... _______1 _________,_-___l ________.
I N/A N/A l ACR0 P.S. ACR0 1 N/A 3014 l N/A 1 N/A
___... 1 ..._____i ____...______________, ....__, ____ ..I _________1
- " I W___l'_.....__, 1
- 1 S-~
+4 L ACR0 911 A/D ACR0
.....___l_____.____..__...__._I . . _ _ . . I .8.*.#2.! ..___.___I _W ._
304 I N/A
/,'
1 y/j 1 N/A y4 y4 ACR0 911 A/D ACR0 4
Form Prepared By: 7bh Date: i o.19-5 5' Form Approved By: dh Date: re-z.G. 7 f
Page 5 of 5 TEST MONITOR LOG *
" TRAIN C CONDUIT SUPPORTS" Client: Texas Utilities Generating Company Test Sample Number: 4- F5 - o 5 CCL Project Number: 1903.11 ch9 13 Test Date: ll-k-gg- Test Procedure Number: 1903.03-01, Rev. 2 I l l l
TASK DESCRIPTION I TEST l (DATA ACQUISITION ROOM) TECH MON l 1
L l 15) Verify that data file has correct name for the sample 1 CN I
being tested.
l
$ 1
- 16) Modify Labtech setup menus as required for the sample behg tested. ICPO I l I /l
- 17) If any transducer and/or signal conditioner has been l l changed since the previous test, enter details on f j
1 Master Test Monitor Log. Scale factors should be opi3 r I recalculated for any channels that have been changed. 'l I If " Calibrate" program is used enter S/N.
I 118) Verify that Labtech scale factors are appropriate for l l the transducers being used. Verify that test sample is properly identified in the Labtech display menu.
i CPS I l
g u l
i 19) Place identification card adjacent to test sample and l l l photograph over all setup. I CPO l
- 20) Test monitor approval to proceed and conduct test to 1 I I Iff-failure per CCL Test Procedure 1903.03-01, Rev. 2. CM/3 1 I
- 21) Place identification card adjacent to test sample and photograph failure mode as required. CPU i
I
- 22) Verify that photographs and post test instrument 1 readings have been taken. 0 93 I h1 i u i l
- 23) Log test sample as being completed on Master Test l l Monitor Log. %h l Form Prepared By: % R4 Ad Date: m qq.es -
Form Approved By:
Date: h 24-f f
+
TRAIN C CONDUIT SUPPORT TESTS CCL PROJECT NUMBER: 1903.11
~
CLIENT: TUGC0 TEST SAMPLE NUMBER: A-53 o]
TEST DATE: ". '
a s n -,- ,1 3 ,- 8 f TEST TIME: / c 3 '?
TESTED BY: Wg h TEST MONITOR: (F4 TEST SAMPLE ASSEMBLED PER SKETCH (Y/N)? __Ya5 DIMENSIONS WITHIN 11/4-INCH (Y/N)? Y.pj y2-I3 yj" FITTINGS: ATTACHMENT HARDWARE:
TORQUE (FOOT-POUNDS): SD TEST SAMPLE: ATTACHMENT HARDWARE: 7/115 (/wo Vv 2 >0 "),g4+-
TORQUE (FOOT-POUNDS): 6 fo2" l15 )
IF HILTI, EMBEDMENT (IN.): 4/n ccL yo] o '7- S 3 -8 I-c~c l- 1099 9.te-86 TEST f/XT7MG
/2 ~ , y. BILL OF MATERIALS
% 2' g-'-________ ' .l 1 - P1115 pipe clamp 16" - P1000 UNISTRUT
~ P' 1 1/2-inch conduit, cut to length (tl")
APR/EC 7\
L p,,,5 J CAD For assembly notes see Figure 7 ccw+7&m?#r4Ai NG. 33 na T
L !
g0 -
a d
l
Page 1 of 5 CYCLIC TEST SAMPLE MONITOR LOG .
Client: lexas Utilities Generating Company Test Sample Number: C - 5'- o / -C.7 CCL Project Number: 1903.07 Test Date: //-/P-6( Test Procedure Number: 1903.07 l I I l l TASK DESCRIPTION l l TEST I l (STATIC TEST BED) l TECH I MON l l l l l l 1) Record instrumentation numbers and calibration due l l dates for all instruments on the attached form. l[6 l .I
- 2) Prior to assembling the test sample, electrically zero l I
\
L 1
the load cell signal conditioners within 23 counts.
Adjust the span to give the reading required for each IMl
}- \l Nl load cell. Readjust zero if necessary and recheck I () i N system. l I
- 3) Record the signal conditioner span readings for l l l each load cell prior to sample assembly. l l l I I I Axis Load Cell Span I i 't l 1.D. Number Reading l l l lM l
l X (axial) 7036 wn l i l l Y-(lateral) 7037 330G l l Z (vertical) t/ag s3 gap l l l I ,1 l
Record the oscillator frequencies for each channel: 1 I
X axis 9.O Hz Y axis jo, o Hz l Z axis //, o Hz l l
l bl I I I i
- 4) Chart recorder setup: l l l 3 L a. Note on strip chart the following: l l l I 1
- project number '
- test date -
h1 1
- sample number v l I
- test engineer - l l
- strip chart speed for test - l l l I l l
.- Page 2 of 5-CYCLIC TEST SAMPLE MONITOR LOG Client: Texas Utilities Generating Company Test Sample Number: d - S- o /- 0 2. CCL Project Number: 1903.07 Test Date: ////g/65 Test Procedure Number: 1903.07
/ /
i I l I TASK DESCRIPTION l TEST l (STATIC TEST BED) l TECH l MON l D I I l 1
l l i
I I l
- 4) CONTINUED I b. Set zero for each channel # l Verify and/or adjust channel span values p)i l
l C. - l
- d. Record brief trace of each channel span setting I h I
- e. Note beside each trace the corresponding span valuel p l l l 7. Note on each trace the corresponding axis I.D.// l l l l q. Note on each trace the range setting during .j- 1 I I calibration and any range changes during the test l l l l l l l l 5) Adjust the oscilloscope trace zero and span for a l l l convenient scale to allow setting load magnitudes. l l l Record range settings below: I I X axis (axial) 5Y V/DIV goo 1bs/DIY I I Y axis (lateral) 5 V/DIY 500 lbs/DIV l l l Z axis (vertical) S V/DIY / goo lbs/DIY l -
~}* b 2 & hrs, _ of Ecmn l l I I i 1
- 6) Assemble test sample per appropriate assembly drawing. I I i
- 1. Mark each part with test sample number. Note any l I discrepancies or changes on assembly drawings. I y l I k N
' \l I 7) Torque bolts to required value. Record the dimensions l i I required on Sheet 2 of the assembly drawing. After l l
torquing bolts, connect loading fixtures to the sample. y 790 JnAD \ .l
- 8) Place identification card adjacent to test sample and '
g photograph overall setup.
J
- 9) Verify that test sample is assembled per appropriate I
~
I drawing. Verify that bolts are properly torqued. l F///j , l Verify that assembly drawing information is complete. l l (
l I l-
- s. .
TEST MONITOR LOG
" TRAIN C CONDUIT SUPPORT" Client: Texas Utilitics Generating Company Test Sample Number: C O/- 0 2 CCL Project Number: 1903.07 Test Date: //-/3 - 65 Test Procedure Number: 1903.07 I
TASK DESCRIPTION TEST l (STATIC TEST BED) l TECH MON l 1 ,
I l l 1 1 I
- 10) Verify that instrumentation data is recorded and l l l 1 instrumentation is in calibration. Verify span !
1 readings for each instrument. lb I l .Lll l L e.u v> u so no. eso m .eca. I I i
- 11) Test monitor approval to proceed and conduct test to I failure per CCL Test Procedure 1903.07 (latest i I
l revision) i
- 12) Place cyclic controller in timed mode for 1 second I bursts. Run each axis separately in 1 second bursts tol I XI 1 , adjust load amplitudes. Record amplitude settings I ( l l below. l l Target Load Control Setting i f l
1
/W / X axis (axial) j5c6 lbs /00 l
I I
/ Y axis (lateral) m ,7 lbs // O l Z axis (vertical) gog7 lbs /50 l l l l
Adjust displacement trip set pcints to appropriate i l I l levels: '
I ls i lateral and vertical axial 0.50v
-to h I I
1 l
N
- 13) Place cyclic controller in cycleAcount mode. Set cyclel counter to Sf37 cycles and staf t test. N,1 l s' I
- 14) Record total number of cycles cotpleted: l g g cycies completed.
l Xl O
r i
Page 4 of 5.
TEST MONITOR LOG
" TRAIN C CONDUIT SUPPORT" ,
i Client: Texas Utilities Generating Company Test Sample Number: 6-5-O/- OA CCL Project Number: 1903.07 l l-Test Date: //-/a -B5 Test Procedure Number: 1903.07 l' l:
I l l l
I TASK DESCRIPTION l TEST l '.
TECH l MON L (STATIC TEST BED) i l I I I I L l i i x\ l '
LOD S L15) Photograph sample after completion of testing. Note x below failure mode if any. I I i l i
l I
'N .
Nb l
k~ I I t 1
- 16) Disassemble test sample and record post test load cell l l l zeros and spans. I I ;
l Post Test l is 1 l Axis Load Cell l l l .
l l
I.D. Number Zero Span l (I s l .
I X axis 703 Y - 0000 32'7'1 1 i 1 axis %93 7 +00/9 332 5 l l Z axis was -gopy 450+
1 i I i l 17) Verify that photographs and post test instrument , l l dik readings have been taken.
eJJ n >M 50 1 1 [lA l 4 l l
&) .Mo 6) , BC2- 1 l l hl i
l 18) Log test sample as being completed on Master Test '7
/A Monitor Log.
I l
r Page 5 of 5.
CYCLIC TEST SAMPLE MONITOR LOG Client: Texas Utilities Generating Company Test Sample Number: 6 O/ - O 2. CCL Project Number: 1903.07 Test Date: ////J/88 Test Procedure Number: 1903.07 Instrument Log I I I I I I l l l l l Cal l I
l Description 1 MFG l Range ' CCL No. l Due l I
i I I I I l I I I pl I X AXIS l Load Cell No. 1 fggcg//l joo l 7038 l l (Axia1) l - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - -- l - ------------l - - --- - l /t7 8 Load Cell Indicator ggoo I jg37 _g,g g l
- - - -- - - - - - -- - -- --- - ---B80Wl$0 Y AXIS Load Cell No. 2 l/ jo-5-6 (Lateral) 1 l - - -- ---- - - -- - - - l /g 3 7
I I
l Load Cell Indicator l l 300 DI jgg 3 gf I I fl 2 AXIS Load Cell No. 3 l f l 70c23 7.2086lI (Vertical) 1
l/E80FIof0" -------- -------ll---------- 1--------l Load Cell Indicator l . 600 l I 10 0 to-2z-gll[
\ aDA)$M!Ci PJ \ I i '
papR l Strip Chart Recorder follLD gidl51 302l 1 W l l l I us6 i Frequency Counter l
/.E7/04/
l--------,
o 608/
,-----..!._-_-------l--------I y' t - 6 i
Oscilloscope l
-'/g~
l y///ous'l $pp $ I
g --- l - -- -- -. . l - - - -- - - - - - - l g . p- SQ (Input) Digital Voltmeter l jc;7 d g l /A # # I G g p ft f 1395-66 (Feedback) Digital Voltmeter g y g yA g/p/Slggg 3.gg.gf Prepared By: [$ # Date: /4 3/-ff~
Approved By: / __ Date: /O-3d d i V i
l I
l